Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1998 Sep;75(3):1415–1423. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)74060-3

Electropermeabilization of mammalian cells to macromolecules: control by pulse duration.

M P Rols 1, J Teissié 1
PMCID: PMC1299816  PMID: 9726943

Abstract

Membrane electropermeabilization to small molecules depends on several physical parameters (pulse intensity, number, and duration). In agreement with a previous study quantifying this phenomenon in terms of flow (Rols and Teissié, Biophys. J. 58:1089-1098, 1990), we report here that electric field intensity is the deciding parameter inducing membrane permeabilization and controls the extent of the cell surface where the transfer can take place. An increase in the number of pulses enhances the rate of permeabilization. The pulse duration parameter is shown to be crucial for the penetration of macromolecules into Chinese hamster ovary cells under conditions where cell viability is preserved. Cumulative effects are observed when repeated pulses are applied. At a constant number of pulses/pulse duration product, transfer of molecules is strongly affected by the time between pulses. The resealing process appears to be first-order with a decay time linearly related to the pulse duration. Transfer of macromolecules to the cytoplasm can take place only if they are present during the pulse. No direct transfer is observed with a postpulse addition. The mechanism of transfer of macromolecules into cells by electric field treatment is much more complex than the simple diffusion of small molecules through the electropermeabilized plasma membrane.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (128.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chu G., Hayakawa H., Berg P. Electroporation for the efficient transfection of mammalian cells with DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Feb 11;15(3):1311–1326. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.3.1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Crowley J. M. Electrical breakdown of bimolecular lipid membranes as an electromechanical instability. Biophys J. 1973 Jul;13(7):711–724. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(73)86017-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Escande-Géraud M. L., Rols M. P., Dupont M. A., Gas N., Teissié J. Reversible plasma membrane ultrastructural changes correlated with electropermeabilization in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988 Apr 7;939(2):247–259. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(88)90068-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gabriel B., Teissié J. Direct observation in the millisecond time range of fluorescent molecule asymmetrical interaction with the electropermeabilized cell membrane. Biophys J. 1997 Nov;73(5):2630–2637. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78292-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gross D., Loew L. M., Webb W. W. Optical imaging of cell membrane potential changes induced by applied electric fields. Biophys J. 1986 Aug;50(2):339–348. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83467-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hibino M., Itoh H., Kinosita K., Jr Time courses of cell electroporation as revealed by submicrosecond imaging of transmembrane potential. Biophys J. 1993 Jun;64(6):1789–1800. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81550-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hibino M., Shigemori M., Itoh H., Nagayama K., Kinosita K., Jr Membrane conductance of an electroporated cell analyzed by submicrosecond imaging of transmembrane potential. Biophys J. 1991 Jan;59(1):209–220. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82212-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hristova N. I., Tsoneva I., Neumann E. Sphingosine-mediated electroporative DNA transfer through lipid bilayers. FEBS Lett. 1997 Sep 22;415(1):81–86. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)01097-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kinosita K., Jr, Ashikawa I., Saita N., Yoshimura H., Itoh H., Nagayama K., Ikegami A. Electroporation of cell membrane visualized under a pulsed-laser fluorescence microscope. Biophys J. 1988 Jun;53(6):1015–1019. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83181-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kinosita K., Jr, Tsong T. Y. Formation and resealing of pores of controlled sizes in human erythrocyte membrane. Nature. 1977 Aug 4;268(5619):438–441. doi: 10.1038/268438a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kubiniec R. T., Liang H., Hui S. W. Effects of pulse length and pulse strength on transfection by electroporation. Biotechniques. 1990 Jan;8(1):16–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kubiniec R. T., Liang H., Hui S. W. Effects of pulse length and pulse strength on transfection by electroporation. Biotechniques. 1990 Jan;8(1):16–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Liang H., Purucker W. J., Stenger D. A., Kubiniec R. T., Hui S. W. Uptake of fluorescence-labeled dextrans by 10T 1/2 fibroblasts following permeation by rectangular and exponential-decay electric field pulses. Biotechniques. 1988 Jun;6(6):550-2, 554, 556-8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lopez A., Rols M. P., Teissie J. 31P NMR analysis of membrane phospholipid organization in viable, reversibly electropermeabilized Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biochemistry. 1988 Feb 23;27(4):1222–1228. doi: 10.1021/bi00404a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Marszalek P., Liu D. S., Tsong T. Y. Schwan equation and transmembrane potential induced by alternating electric field. Biophys J. 1990 Oct;58(4):1053–1058. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82447-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mir L. M., Orlowski S., Belehradek J., Jr, Paoletti C. Electrochemotherapy potentiation of antitumour effect of bleomycin by local electric pulses. Eur J Cancer. 1991;27(1):68–72. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90064-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Morgan W. F., Day J. P. The introduction of proteins into mammalian cells by electroporation. Methods Mol Biol. 1995;48:63–71. doi: 10.1385/0-89603-304-X:63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Neumann E., Kakorin S., Tsoneva I., Nikolova B., Tomov T. Calcium-mediated DNA adsorption to yeast cells and kinetics of cell transformation by electroporation. Biophys J. 1996 Aug;71(2):868–877. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79288-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Neumann E., Schaefer-Ridder M., Wang Y., Hofschneider P. H. Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J. 1982;1(7):841–845. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01257.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Prausnitz M. R., Bose V. G., Langer R., Weaver J. C. Electroporation of mammalian skin: a mechanism to enhance transdermal drug delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Nov 15;90(22):10504–10508. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Prausnitz M. R., Lau B. S., Milano C. D., Conner S., Langer R., Weaver J. C. A quantitative study of electroporation showing a plateau in net molecular transport. Biophys J. 1993 Jul;65(1):414–422. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81081-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Prausnitz M. R., Milano C. D., Gimm J. A., Langer R., Weaver J. C. Quantitative study of molecular transport due to electroporation: uptake of bovine serum albumin by erythrocyte ghosts. Biophys J. 1994 May;66(5):1522–1530. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80943-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rols M. P., Coulet D., Teissié J. Highly efficient transfection of mammalian cells by electric field pulses. Application to large volumes of cell culture by using a flow system. Eur J Biochem. 1992 May 15;206(1):115–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb16908.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rols M. P., Delteil C., Serin G., Teissié J. Temperature effects on electrotransfection of mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Feb 11;22(3):540–540. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.3.540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rols M. P., Femenia P., Teissie J. Long-lived macropinocytosis takes place in electropermeabilized mammalian cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995 Mar 8;208(1):26–35. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rols M. P., Teissie J. Ionic-strength modulation of electrically induced permeabilization and associated fusion of mammalian cells. Eur J Biochem. 1989 Jan 15;179(1):109–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1989.tb14527.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rols M. P., Teissié J. Electropermeabilization of mammalian cells. Quantitative analysis of the phenomenon. Biophys J. 1990 Nov;58(5):1089–1098. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82451-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rols M. P., Teissié J. Modulation of electrically induced permeabilization and fusion of Chinese hamster ovary cells by osmotic pressure. Biochemistry. 1990 May 15;29(19):4561–4567. doi: 10.1021/bi00471a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rosemberg Y., Korenstein R. Electroporation of the photosynthetic membrane: A study by intrinsic and external optical probes. Biophys J. 1990 Oct;58(4):823–832. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82428-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rosemberg Y., Rotenberg M., Korenstein R. Electroporation of the photosynthetic membrane: structural changes in protein and lipid-protein domains. Biophys J. 1994 Sep;67(3):1060–1066. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80571-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Saulis G. Pore disappearance in a cell after electroporation: theoretical simulation and comparison with experiments. Biophys J. 1997 Sep;73(3):1299–1309. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78163-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schwister K., Deuticke B. Formation and properties of aqueous leaks induced in human erythrocytes by electrical breakdown. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1985 Jun 27;816(2):332–348. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(85)90501-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sowers A. E., Lieber M. R. Electropore diameters, lifetimes, numbers, and locations in individual erythrocyte ghosts. FEBS Lett. 1986 Sep 15;205(2):179–184. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(86)80893-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Stenger D. A., Hui S. W. Kinetics of ultrastructural changes during electrically induced fusion of human erythrocytes. J Membr Biol. 1986;93(1):43–53. doi: 10.1007/BF01871017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sugar I. P., Förster W., Neumann E. Model of cell electrofusion. Membrane electroporation, pore coalescence and percolation. Biophys Chem. 1987 May 9;26(2-3):321–335. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(87)80033-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sukharev S. I., Klenchin V. A., Serov S. M., Chernomordik L. V., Chizmadzhev YuA Electroporation and electrophoretic DNA transfer into cells. The effect of DNA interaction with electropores. Biophys J. 1992 Nov;63(5):1320–1327. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81709-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sung W., Park P. J. Dynamics of pore growth in membranes and membrane stability. Biophys J. 1997 Oct;73(4):1797–1804. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78210-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Teissie J., Rols M. P. Manipulation of cell cytoskeleton affects the lifetime of cell membrane electropermeabilization. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994 May 31;720:98–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb30438.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Teissie J., Tsong T. Y. Electric field induced transient pores in phospholipid bilayer vesicles. Biochemistry. 1981 Mar 17;20(6):1548–1554. doi: 10.1021/bi00509a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Teissie J., Tsong T. Y. Evidence of voltage-induced channel opening in Na/K ATPase of human erythrocyte membrane. J Membr Biol. 1980 Jul 15;55(2):133–140. doi: 10.1007/BF01871155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Teissié J., Rols M. P. An experimental evaluation of the critical potential difference inducing cell membrane electropermeabilization. Biophys J. 1993 Jul;65(1):409–413. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81052-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Titomirov A. V., Sukharev S., Kistanova E. In vivo electroporation and stable transformation of skin cells of newborn mice by plasmid DNA. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991 Jan 17;1088(1):131–134. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(91)90162-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tsong T. Y. Electroporation of cell membranes. Biophys J. 1991 Aug;60(2):297–306. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82054-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wilson A. K., Horwitz J., De Lanerolle P. Evaluation of the electroinjection method for introducing proteins into living cells. Am J Physiol. 1991 Feb;260(2 Pt 1):C355–C363. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1991.260.2.C355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wolf H., Rols M. P., Boldt E., Neumann E., Teissié J. Control by pulse parameters of electric field-mediated gene transfer in mammalian cells. Biophys J. 1994 Feb;66(2 Pt 1):524–531. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(94)80805-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Xie T. D., Tsong T. Y. Study of mechanisms of electric field-induced DNA transfection. III. Electric parameters and other conditions for effective transfection. Biophys J. 1992 Jul;63(1):28–34. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81580-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zimmermann U., Riemann F., Pilwat G. Enzyme loading of electrically homogeneous human red blood cell ghosts prepared by dielelctric breakdown. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Jun 17;436(2):460–474. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90208-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES