Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1999 Mar;76(3):1166–1178. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77281-4

Free energy landscapes of encounter complexes in protein-protein association.

C J Camacho 1, Z Weng 1, S Vajda 1, C DeLisi 1
PMCID: PMC1300098  PMID: 10049302

Abstract

We report the computer generation of a high-density map of the thermodynamic properties of the diffusion-accessible encounter conformations of four receptor-ligand protein pairs, and use it to study the electrostatic and desolvation components of the free energy of association. Encounter complex conformations are generated by sampling the translational/rotational space of the ligand around the receptor, both at 5-A and zero surface-to-surface separations. We find that partial desolvation is always an important effect, and it becomes dominant for complexes in which one of the reactants is neutral or weakly charged. The interaction provides a slowly varying attractive force over a small but significant region of the molecular surface. In complexes with no strong charge complementarity this region surrounds the binding site, and the orientation of the ligand in the encounter conformation with the lowest desolvation free energy is similar to the one observed in the fully formed complex. Complexes with strong opposite charges exhibit two types of behavior. In the first group, represented by barnase/barstar, electrostatics exerts strong orientational steering toward the binding site, and desolvation provides some added adhesion within the local region of low electrostatic energy. In the second group, represented by the complex of kallikrein and pancreatic trypsin inhibitor, the overall stability results from the rather nonspecific electrostatic attraction, whereas the affinity toward the binding region is determined by desolvation interactions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (497.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berg O. G., von Hippel P. H. Diffusion-controlled macromolecular interactions. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1985;14:131–160. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.14.060185.001023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Camacho C. J., Thirumalai D. Kinetics and thermodynamics of folding in model proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jul 1;90(13):6369–6372. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.13.6369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Camacho CJ. Entropic Barriers, Frustration, and Order: Basic Ingredients in Protein Folding. Phys Rev Lett. 1996 Sep 9;77(11):2324–2327. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DeLisi C. The biophysics of ligand-receptor interactions. Q Rev Biophys. 1980 May;13(2):201–230. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500001657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dill K. A. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry. 1990 Aug 7;29(31):7133–7155. doi: 10.1021/bi00483a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gabdoulline R. R., Wade R. C. Simulation of the diffusional association of barnase and barstar. Biophys J. 1997 May;72(5):1917–1929. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78838-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goodsell D. S., Olson A. J. Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing. Proteins. 1990;8(3):195–202. doi: 10.1002/prot.340080302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hendsch Z. S., Tidor B. Do salt bridges stabilize proteins? A continuum electrostatic analysis. Protein Sci. 1994 Feb;3(2):211–226. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560030206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Honig B., Nicholls A. Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science. 1995 May 26;268(5214):1144–1149. doi: 10.1126/science.7761829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Horton N., Lewis M. Calculation of the free energy of association for protein complexes. Protein Sci. 1992 Jan;1(1):169–181. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560010117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Israelachvili J., Wennerström H. Role of hydration and water structure in biological and colloidal interactions. Nature. 1996 Jan 18;379(6562):219–225. doi: 10.1038/379219a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jackson R. M., Sternberg M. J. A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: application to the docking problem. J Mol Biol. 1995 Jul 7;250(2):258–275. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Janin J. Elusive affinities. Proteins. 1995 Jan;21(1):30–39. doi: 10.1002/prot.340210105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Janin J. The kinetics of protein-protein recognition. Proteins. 1997 Jun;28(2):153–161. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(199706)28:2<153::aid-prot4>3.0.co;2-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee B., Richards F. M. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol. 1971 Feb 14;55(3):379–400. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Levitt M., Park B. H. Water: now you see it, now you don't. Structure. 1993 Dec 15;1(4):223–226. doi: 10.1016/0969-2126(93)90011-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nauchitel V., Villaverde M. C., Sussman F. Solvent accessibility as a predictive tool for the free energy of inhibitor binding to the HIV-1 protease. Protein Sci. 1995 Jul;4(7):1356–1364. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Northrup S. H., Erickson H. P. Kinetics of protein-protein association explained by Brownian dynamics computer simulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Apr 15;89(8):3338–3342. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.8.3338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Novotny J., Bruccoleri R. E., Saul F. A. On the attribution of binding energy in antigen-antibody complexes McPC 603, D1.3, and HyHEL-5. Biochemistry. 1989 May 30;28(11):4735–4749. doi: 10.1021/bi00437a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rosenfeld R., Vajda S., DeLisi C. Flexible docking and design. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1995;24:677–700. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.24.060195.003333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. SCHELLMAN J. A. The stability of hydrogen-bonded peptide structures in aqueous solution. C R Trav Lab Carlsberg Chim. 1955;29(14-15):230–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schreiber G., Fersht A. R. Rapid, electrostatically assisted association of proteins. Nat Struct Biol. 1996 May;3(5):427–431. doi: 10.1038/nsb0596-427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sharp K. A., Honig B. Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules: theory and applications. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1990;19:301–332. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.19.060190.001505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sharp K., Fine R., Honig B. Computer simulations of the diffusion of a substrate to an active site of an enzyme. Science. 1987 Jun 12;236(4807):1460–1463. doi: 10.1126/science.3589666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shoichet B. K., Kuntz I. D. Protein docking and complementarity. J Mol Biol. 1991 Sep 5;221(1):327–346. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)80222-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sommer J., Jonah C., Fukuda R., Bersohn R. Production and subsequent second-order decomposition of protein disulfide anions lengthy collisions between proteins. J Mol Biol. 1982 Aug 25;159(4):721–744. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90110-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stone S. R., Dennis S., Hofsteenge J. Quantitative evaluation of the contribution of ionic interactions to the formation of the thrombin-hirudin complex. Biochemistry. 1989 Aug 22;28(17):6857–6863. doi: 10.1021/bi00443a012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vajda S., Weng Z., Rosenfeld R., DeLisi C. Effect of conformational flexibility and solvation on receptor-ligand binding free energies. Biochemistry. 1994 Nov 29;33(47):13977–13988. doi: 10.1021/bi00251a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wallis R., Moore G. R., James R., Kleanthous C. Protein-protein interactions in colicin E9 DNase-immunity protein complexes. 1. Diffusion-controlled association and femtomolar binding for the cognate complex. Biochemistry. 1995 Oct 24;34(42):13743–13750. doi: 10.1021/bi00042a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Weng Z., Delisi C., Vajda S. Empirical free energy calculation: comparison to calorimetric data. Protein Sci. 1997 Sep;6(9):1976–1984. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wodak S. J., Janin J. Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction. J Mol Biol. 1978 Sep 15;124(2):323–342. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90302-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang C., Cornette J. L., Delisi C. Consistency in structural energetics of protein folding and peptide recognition. Protein Sci. 1997 May;6(5):1057–1064. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang C., Vasmatzis G., Cornette J. L., DeLisi C. Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. J Mol Biol. 1997 Apr 4;267(3):707–726. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. von Hippel P. H., Berg O. G. Facilitated target location in biological systems. J Biol Chem. 1989 Jan 15;264(2):675–678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. von Hippel P. H., Berg O. G. On the specificity of DNA-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Mar;83(6):1608–1612. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.6.1608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES