Skip to main content
Epidemiologia logoLink to Epidemiologia
. 2026 Mar 2;7(2):34. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia7020034

Comorbidities and Concomitant Medications in Middle-Aged Japanese People According to the Charlson Comorbidity Index and Age: Results of the NDB-K7Ps-Study-3

Airi Sekine 1, Kei Nakajima 1,2,*
Editor: Alberto Arnedo-Pena
PMCID: PMC13010749  PMID: 41873983

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), which focuses on 19 comorbid diseases and conditions, has been widely used as a valid predictor of mortality. This study aimed to comprehensively examine the prevalence of nearly all comorbidities and concomitant medications according to CCI classification (CCI = 0 and CCI ≥ 4) and age group (aged 40–44 and 70–74 years) in middle-aged Japanese adults. Methods: The present study included 9,182,226 individuals who underwent health checkups from April 2018 to March 2019. A total of 15,916 cases of diagnosed diseases and conditions, including communicable diseases; diseases of the eye, ear, skin, and musculoskeletal system; and psychiatric disorders, were investigated alongside 16,886 prescribed medications. Results: The prevalence of allergic rhinitis was ranked among the leading comorbidities in all age groups and CCI categories. Individuals with a CCI ≥ 4 in the 40–44 age group showed a higher prevalence of cardiometabolic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia compared with individuals with a CCI = 0 in the 70–74 age group. Furthermore, individuals with a CCI ≥ 4 in the 40–44 age group also had a higher prevalence of communicable diseases, gastrointestinal symptoms, iron deficiency anemia, and psychiatric disorders compared with individuals with a CCI = 0 in the 70–74 age group. The ranking for prescribed medications was essentially the same between age groups, but was found to differ between CCI categories. Conclusions: This study identified overlooked comorbidities and concomitant medications that are not accounted for in the 19 conditions included in the CCI, which may be important prognostic factors in determining mortality. Although patients with more comorbidities were found to be more frequently diagnosed with cardiometabolic diseases regardless of their age, the presence of pharmacotherapy may be dependent on age.

Keywords: national database, diagnosis, prescribed medication, health checkups, Charlson Comorbidity Index

1. Introduction

The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), developed by Charlson et al. in 1987, is widely used to determine the survival rate in patients with multiple comorbidities based on 19 diseases and conditions [1,2]. The CCI has been considered a confounding factor in outcome studies for predicting patient prognoses when adjusting for potential disease severity [3,4].

Because the CCI was specifically designed to quantify comorbidity burden in relation to mortality risk, rather than to capture the overall prevalence of all comorbidities, previous CCI-based studies have been limited to the few specific diseases included in the CCI. Therefore, little is known about the comprehensive prevalence of diagnosed diseases and prescribed medications that are not included among the criteria of the CCI, such as dyslipidemia, communicable diseases, eye and ear diseases, dermatological and musculoskeletal diseases, and psychiatric disorders. Particularly, psychiatric disorders and allergic diseases have been reported to be associated with additional increased mortality and adverse health outcomes in population-based studies [5,6,7]. Comprehensively investigating the relationship between the CCI and comorbidities that are not among the 19 comorbidities in the CCI may provide valuable and novel insights for disease prevention and health promotion in future epidemiological research (Figure S1).

The risk of cardiometabolic diseases, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome increases markedly from middle age (40 years and older) [8], and the onset of these conditions during this period has major implications for long-term morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Middle-aged adults therefore represent a critical population for prevention and early lifestyle intervention. In Japan, all health insurers are required to provide health checkups for individuals aged 40–74 years and promote healthy lifestyle changes. The data from these checkups, along with nationwide health insurance claims, are integrated in the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups (NDB). This database also contains comprehensive information on diagnosed diseases and prescribed medications, and covers nearly the entire Japanese population, making it a valuable resource for large-scale epidemiological studies.

Previous studies have developed algorithms to determine the CCI using claims databases such as the NDB, primarily relying on the International Classification of Diseases (9th and 10th Revisions (ICD-9 and ICD-10) codes) [9,10,11,12]. However, the original CCI was designed for medical chart data and includes criteria that are not discernable from ICD-10 codes; for example, included individuals with diet-controlled diabetes are excluded from the CCI criteria, which may lead to overestimation of comorbidity scores.

This study aimed to comprehensively examine the prevalence of diagnosed diseases and prescribed medications according to CCI classification and age group among Japanese adults aged 40–74 years, with a particular focus on age-related differences within CCI categories.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design

This study was a cross-sectional and sub-study of the National Database Study in the Kanto 7 Prefectures (Tokyo, Kanagawa, Saitama, Chiba, Ibaraki, Gunma, and Tochigi; NDB-K7Ps Study), which aimed to investigate the clinical factors that are primarily associated with cardiometabolic diseases. The database comprises data on disease diagnoses, prescribed medications, and annual health checkup information for Japanese people aged 40–74 years [13]. The details of the NDB-K7Ps Study’s concept and design are provided in [14].

2.2. Data Source and Study Population

The present study included data on 10,183,619 individuals of both sexes who were living in any of the above seven prefectures of Kanto and who underwent specific health checkups from April 2018 to March 2019, which are mandatory for people aged 40–74 years in Japan [15]. The participation rate in the annual health checkup in the Kanto 7 Prefectures from April 2018 to March 2019 was 58.3% [16].

It was important to exclude individuals with implausibly low or implausibly high serum parameters, while minimizing the removal of clinically meaningful extreme values; therefore, we excluded data for individuals whose measurements were below the 0.01st percentile or above the 99.9th percentile for body mass index, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, or γ-glutamyl transferase (Table S1). This method for measuring the biochemical parameters was described in a previously published protocol [17]. After these data were excluded, data for a total of 9,182,226 individuals were analyzed in this study.

2.3. Hospitalization and Demographic Data

Demographic data were obtained from the health checkup data in the NDB. Individuals with severe conditions or disabilities requiring hospitalization or residence in a nursing home were unlikely to be included in this study because the NDB health checkup data cover individuals who are able to undergo health checkups at their workplace or through their local government.

2.4. Disease Diagnosis and Prescribed Medications

Japan’s disease codes are used for insurance claims in Japan [18] and they correspond to disease classifications which are more detailed than ICD-10 codes [19,20]. In this study, we identified 15,916 diseases using Japan’s disease codes, corresponding to categories from A to N in the ICD-10; namely, all diagnosed diseases and conditions except for maternal and neonatal diseases, poisoning, and accidental injury. In Japan, the diagnostic term “hyperlipidemia” was officially renamed to “dyslipidemia” in 2007; however, the previous term was still widely used in insurance claims data in 2018 [21]. In the present study, we retained the original diagnostic terms as recorded in the database to accurately reflect real-world clinical practice. Similarly, we identified 16,886 prescribed medications using Japan’s medication codes for insurance claims in Japan, excluding herbal medicine and diagnostic reagents. These codes correspond to a detailed classification of medications, namely the dosage, form, and method of administration (powder, tablet, capsules, injection, tape, or patch), trade name, whether it is an original or generic product, and the pharmaceutical company that manufactures the drug. For example, Acetaminophen (original product) is separately coded as “620002023” and “620000033” for doses of 200 and 300 mg, respectively, in Japan’s medication codes. Information about therapeutic category was collected from the package insert or the search system of the Prescription Medications in Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency [20]. The disease and medication codes on insurance claims are rigorously checked by medical clerks in each hospital, clinic, and dispensing pharmacy. We defined individuals with each diagnosis and medication as those who were diagnosed or prescribed medication at least once from April 2018 to March 2019 in order to comprehensively include both acute and chronic conditions.

2.5. Charlson Comorbidity Index

The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), originally developed and validated by Charlson et al. [1], was calculated using a previously validated algorithm based on ICD-10 codes [9,22], with minor adaptations for the Japanese NDB. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is calculated as the simple sum of the weighted index (1, 2, 3, or 6 points) of 19 comorbidities according to their potential influence on mortality; the CCI includes diabetes with/without diabetic complications, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, mild and severe liver disease, hemiplegia, renal disease, leukemia, lymphoma, metastatic tumor, and AIDS [1]. In this study, we determined the CCI using both diagnosed diseases and conditions as well as prescribed medication from the Japanese database, the NDB. Detailed definitions of the 19 comorbidities based on the ICD-10 codes were selected by Quan and Ono [9,22], and other criteria (identified using Japan’s medication codes) are shown in Table S2. We defined individuals with “diabetes without chronic complications” as those diagnosed with at least 1 of 30 disease codes for diabetes without chronic complications and who were prescribed at least 1 of 487 oral hypoglycemic agents or 61 insulin preparations without insulin for intravenous injection (vial formulation). Therefore, individuals with diabetes who were not receiving pharmacotherapy (e.g., early and diet-controlled diabetes) were not included in the CCI. Individuals who had “diabetes with chronic complications” were defined as those with diabetic retinopathy, neuropathy, or nephropathy, or who were hospitalized with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome (HHS). In this study, individuals with diabetes who were prescribed at least 1 of 23 medications for diabetic retinopathy were included in the group with diabetic retinopathy. We defined individuals with DKA or HHS as those who were diagnosed with DKA, HHS, or diabetic coma. We also defined hospitalized individuals with DKA or HHS as those who were prescribed an insulin preparation for intravenous injection. “Mild liver disease” refers to diagnoses of chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis without portal hypertension. “Moderate liver disease” includes diagnoses of chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis with portal hypertension, and “severe liver disease” includes diagnoses of variceal bleeding. Metastatic tumor includes diagnoses of end-stage cancer and unknown primary cancer. Several definitions in the CCI, such as hospitalization, detailed symptoms with electrocardiogram change, New York Heart Association functional classification, and serum creatinine are unavailable in this database; these are described in Table S2. For example, several common chronic conditions such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and hyperuricemia or gout are not included in the CCI criteria. To disclose the difference most clearly in the prevalence of diagnosed diseases and prescribed medications between individuals with no comorbidities and those with a high burden of comorbidities, we categorized the study individuals into CCI = 0 and CCI ≥ 4. This approach was chosen to avoid heterogeneity, as the severity of diseases varies widely among individuals with moderate comorbidities (CCI = 1–3). Previous studies have defined CCI ≥ 4 as high comorbidity and have reported its association with mortality [23]. In contrast, CCI = 0 represents an appropriate reference group without major comorbidity. In this study, age-adjusted CCI was used, which is a highly important predictor of long-term mortality [1,24].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The prevalence of all diagnosed diseases and prescribed medications is expressed as n (%) and was rank ordered. The clinical characteristics of the included individuals are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range). To protect participant privacy, age data in the NDB are provided in 5-year categories; therefore, individual-level age data were unavailable in the NDB. To evaluate subject age as a numeric value, we transformed age groups into substitute ages corresponding to the median for each age group (42, 47, 52, 57, 62, 67, and 72 years, respectively). Statistical significance of difference between CCI = 0 and CCI ≥ 4 was compared using analysis of co-variance adjusting for S-age. To disclose the difference most clearly in the prevalence of diagnosed diseases and prescribed medications between younger and older adults, we categorized the study individuals into 40–44 and 70–74 years, representing the youngest and oldest available age groups in the database [25]. In this study, age-adjusted CCI was calculated as the simple sum of the weighted index as supplementary information to aid interpretation (aged 40–44: 1 or 70–74: 4 points; therefore, CCI ≥ 4 aged 40–44: age-adjusted CCI ≥ 5, CCI ≥ 4 aged 70–74: age-adjusted CCI ≥ 8), which is a highly important predictor of long-term mortality [1,24]. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed using Student’s t-test and the χ2 test, respectively. Logistic regression models were used to examine the prevalence of each disease, comparing the group with a CCI ≥ 4 and aged 40–44 years to the group with a CCI = 0 and aged 70–74 years. The results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The models were adjusted for potential confounders: sex, BMI, SBP, DBP, triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), pharmacotherapy for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, smoking status, habitual exercise (≥30 min per session, >2 times/week vs. less frequent), and habitual alcohol consumption and frequency. The χ2 test, to determine the prevalence of prescribed medications, was conducted using EZR version 1.68 (Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan), which is a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) [25]. Other statistical analyses were conducted using SAS-Enterprise Guide (SAS-EG 7.1) in SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. When differences in the proportion of patients who were diagnosed selected diseases among four groups (age and CCI categories) were evaluated by the χ2 test, values of p < 0.007 were considered to represent statistical significance on the basis of the Bonferroni test.

2.7. Ethics Approval of Research

The study protocol was approved by Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) in December 2020, and we received digitally recorded anonymous data in July 2022 (No. 2320). This study was carried out in accordance with the guidelines set out in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Ethics Committee of Japan Women’s University (No. 513; 11 May 2022). The details of the data processing that was conducted to link the health checkup data with the datasets, comprising diagnosed diseases and prescribed medications, were provided in the previous study [26]. Informed consent was not required because of the anonymous data of the MHLW as part of its nationwide program involving the provision of medical data to third parties [27]. On its website, The MHLW publicly announces the provision of the NDB data to researchers for secondary analyses [28]. In addition, our institution posts information regarding the use of these data on its website, including the purpose of use and responsible investigators [29]. The public can request details of the research results, and such requests are addressed individually. This process is in accordance with the “opt-out” provisions of the Japanese Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Biological Research Involving Human Subjects.

3. Results

Table 1 shows the 30 most-diagnosed diseases and conditions among all included individuals. Table S3 shows the 100 most-diagnosed diseases and conditions, or, specifically, those with over 1% prevalence. Allergic rhinitis was the most prevalent among all individuals, followed by hypertension, acute bronchitis, allergic conjunctivitis and astigmatism. In Table 2, the 30 most frequently prescribed medications are organized according to their therapeutic category, nonproprietary name, whether they are original or generic products, and their dosage. Table S4 shows the 50 most frequently prescribed medications in detail. Loxoprofen Sodium Hydrate (60 mg, generic) was the most frequently prescribed among all individuals, followed by Rebamipide (100 mg, generic), L-Carbocisteine (500 mg, generic), Tranexamic Acid (250 mg, generic) and Acetaminophen (200 mg, original). The therapeutic categories of medication ranking within the top 20 were antipyretics and analgesics, anti-inflammatory drugs, antitussives and allergic agents, expectorants, and common cold drugs. The most frequently prescribed medication for cardiometabolic disease was Rosuvastatin Calcium (2.5 mg, generic), a hyperlipidemic agent. The most frequently prescribed antidiabetic agents and antihypertensives were Metformin Hydrochloride (250 mg, original; n = 81,290; 0.80%) and azilsartan (20 mg, original; n = 68,157; 0.67%), respectively, which were among the top 50 most frequently prescribed medications (Table S4).

Table 1.

Prevalence of 30 most-diagnosed diseases in all included individuals.

Order Names of Diagnoses Corresponding
ICD-10 Code
N %
1 Allergic rhinitis J304 3,065,920 30.1
2 Hypertension I10 2,273,580 22.3
3 Acute bronchitis J209 1,720,087 16.9
4 Allergic conjunctivitis H101 1,663,753 16.3
5 Astigmatism H522 1,660,681 16.3
6 Acute upper respiratory infection J069 1,379,966 13.6
7 Chronic gastritis K295 1,308,946 12.9
8 Hyperlipidemia E785 1,105,219 10.9
9 Asthmatic bronchitis J459 1,022,058 10.0
10 Low back pain M5456 1,013,491 10.0
11 Pure hypercholesterolemia E780 994,931 9.77
12 Reflux esophagitis K210 962,915 9.46
13 Gastritis K297 959,187 9.42
14 Unspecified diabetes mellitus E14 932,525 9.16
15 Acute laryngopharyngitis J060 906,869 8.91
16 Sleep disorders G470 868,176 8.53
17 Eczema L309 790,078 7.76
18 Constipation K590 775,587 7.62
19 Acute pharyngitis J029 672,645 6.61
20 Dyslipidemia E785 670,287 6.58
21 Gastric ulcer K259 662,972 6.51
22 Pharyngitis J029 613,103 6.02
23 Hyperuricemia E790 610,144 5.99
24 Acute sinusitis J019 597,165 5.86
25 Dry eye syndrome H041 585,108 5.75
26 Cataract H269 579,856 5.69
27 Gonarthrosis M171 558,320 5.48
28 Disorder of peripheral nervous system G629 512,869 5.04
29 Hypermetropic astigmatism H522 509,477 5.00
30 Acute gastritis K291 480,256 4.72

ICD-10: International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. The 30 most-diagnosed diseases among all included individuals.

Table 2.

Prevalence of 30 most-prescribed medications in all included individuals.

Order Therapeutic Category Drug Name N % Number of Generic Drugs
1 Antipyretics and analgesics, anti-inflammatory agents Loxoprofen Sodium Hydrate 60 mg generic 1,625,762 16.0 18
2 Peptic ulcer agents Rebamipide 100 mg generic 1,565,015 15.4 28
3 Expectorants L-Carbocisteine 500 mg generic 1,242,743 12.2 5
4 Hemostatics Tranexamic Acid 250 mg generic 832,427 8.17 3
5 Antipyretics and analgesics, anti-inflammatory agents Acetaminophen 200 mg original 826,003 8.11 —
6 Acting mainly on Gram-positive bacteria and mycoplasma Clarithromycin 200 mg generic 629,535 6.18 14
7 Other allergic agents Fexofenadine Hydrochloride 60 mg generic 592,773 5.82 31
8 Antitussives Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide Hydrate 15 mg generic 577,288 5.67 2
9 Common cold drugs Salicylamide/Acetaminophen/Anhydrous Caffeine/Promethazine Methylenedisalicylate original 564,114 5.54 3
10 Other allergic agents Montelukast Sodium 10 mg generic 543,802 5.34 39
11 Acting mainly on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria Cefcapene Pivoxil Hydrochloride Hydrate 100 mg generic 521,540 5.12 5
12 Expectorants L-Carbocisteine 250 mg generic 488,884 4.80 5
13 Ophthalmic agents Olopatadine Hydrochloride Solution 0.1% original 453,098 4.45 —
14 Antipyretics and analgesics, anti-inflammatory agents Loxoprofen Sodium Hydrate 60 mg original 438,888 4.31 —
15 Other allergic agents Bilastine 20 mg original 419,665 4.12 —
16 Antitussives Dihydrocodeine Phosphate/dL-Methylephedrine Hydrochloride/
Chlorpheniramine Maleate original
393,262 3.86 —
17 Other allergic agents Levocetirizine Hydrochloride 5 mg original 383,144 3.76 —
18 Other digestive organ agents Dequalinium Chloride Troches 0.25 mg generic 362,891 3.56 —
19 Antitussives and expectorants Tipepidine Hibenzate 20 mg original 345,287 3.39 —
20 Antipyretics and analgesics, anti-inflammatory agents Acetaminophen 300 mg original 343,955 3.38 —
21 Antipyretics and analgesics, anti-inflammatory agents Celecoxib 100 mg original 339,625 3.34 —
22 Hyperlipidemia agents Rosuvastatin Calcium 2.5 mg generic 323,649 3.18 40
23 Antitussives Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide Hydrate 15 mg original 318,049 3.12 —
24 Otic and nasal agents Fluticasone Furoate 27.5 µg metered Nasal Spray original 310,090 3.04 —
25 Antipyretics and analgesics, anti-inflammatory agents Acetaminophen 500 mg original 304,612 2.99 —
26 Other allergic agents Bepotastine Besilate 10 mg generic 303,605 2.98 13
27 Expectorants L-Carbocisteine 500 mg original 301,392 2.96 —
28 Anticoagulants Heparinoid cream/lotion/spray/gel 0.3% generic 277,929 2.73 26
29 Antidiarrheals, intestinal regulators Clostridium butyricum original 272,769 2.68 —
30 Peptic ulcer agents Esomeprazole Magnesium Hydrate 20 mg original 252,680 2.48 —

The 30 most-prescribed medications are described according to their therapeutic category, nonproprietary name, whether they are original or generic products, and their dosage. Therapeutic category is decided according to the package insert or the Prescription Medications in Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency’s search system [20].

Table 3 shows the clinical characteristics of individuals according to their CCI category. The proportions of the study population with CCI = 0 and CCI ≥ 4 were 62.9% and 3.42% of all individuals, respectively. Individuals with a CCI ≥ 4 were found to be older, with higher body mass index, SBP, DBP, TG, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, γ-glutamyl transferase, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and lower LDL-C levels in comparison with individuals with a CCI = 0 (all p < 0.0001). In all individuals, the most prevalent condition among the 19 CCI comorbidities was chronic pulmonary disease, followed by mild liver disease and peptic ulcer disease. In the CCI ≥ 4 group, the most prevalent disease among CCI comorbidities was mild liver disease, followed by chronic pulmonary disease and peptic ulcer disease. The most prevalent chronic pulmonary disease was asthmatic bronchitis both in all the included individuals (n = 919,088; 65.3% of individuals with chronic pulmonary disease) and in the individuals in the CCI ≥4 group (n = 86,782; 60.6% of individuals with chronic pulmonary disease). Similarly, the most prevalent peptic ulcer disease was gastric ulcer, both in all included individuals (n = 598,864; 82.1% of individuals with peptic ulcer disease) and in the individuals in the CCI ≥ 4 group (n = 118,679; 84.0% of individuals with peptic ulcer disease). The most prevalent mild liver disease among all included individuals was liver dysfunction (n = 357,731; 41.6% of individuals with mild liver disease), and the most prevalent mild liver disease in the CCI ≥ 4 group was fatty liver (n = 62,757; 42.9% of individuals with mild liver disease), followed by liver dysfunction (n = 58,466; 39.9% of individuals with mild liver disease). Among other diagnosed diseases, the proportions of hypertension and dyslipidemia were higher among the individuals in the CCI ≥ 4 group than those in the CCI = 0 group (all p < 0.0001).

Table 3.

Clinical characteristics of individuals according to CCI category.

All CCI = 0 CCI ≥ 4
N (%) 9,182,226 5,775,406 (62.9) 314,252 (3.42)
Men (n, %) 5,012,643 (54.6) 3,220,387 (55.8) 186,839 (59.5)
Women (n, %) 4,169,583 (45.4) 2,555,019 (44.2) 127,413 (40.5)
S-age (years old) 53.3 ± 10.0 51.6 ± 9.4 61.3 ± 8.7
BMI (kg/m2) 23.3 ± 3.7 23.0 ± 3.6 24.3 ± 4.3
SBP (mmHg) 123.5 ± 17.4 122.6 ± 17.5 127.8 ± 16.9
DBP (mmHg) 75.9 ± 11.9 75.8 ± 12.1 76.0 ± 11.2
TG (IQ)(mg/dL) 91 (64–135) 87 (61–130) 104 (73–152)
HDL-C (mg/dL) 64.4 ± 17.3 65.0 ± 17.3 60.6 ± 17.3
LDL-C (mg/dL) 124.8 ± 31.3 126.4 ± 31.3 114.3 ± 31.2
AST (U/L) 23.5 ± 10.6 22.8 ± 9.2 26.1 ± 13.9
ALT (U/L) 23.5 ± 16.8 22.5 ± 15.3 25.6 ± 19.1
γ-GTP (U/L) 39.2 ± 46.5 37.0 ± 42.2 45.3 ± 57.1
HbA1c (%) 5.6 ± 0.6 5.5 ± 0.5 6.1 ± 1.0
CCI 0.68 ± 1.2 0.0 4.97 ± 1.35
Current smokers, n (%) 2,039,421 (22.2) 1,417,283 (24.5) 47,105 (15.0)
Regular exercise, n (%) *1 2,418,722 (26.3) 2,094,536 (36.3) 97,079 (30.9)
Regular drinking, n (%) *2 5,000,474 (54.5) 3,245,055 (56.2) 144,759 (46.1)
Diagnosed disease concerning CCI, n (%)
Myocardial infarction 58,223 (0.63) — *3 24,653 (7.84)
Congestive heart failure 306,096 (3.33) — *3 96,306 (30.7)
Peripheral vascular disease 365,887 (3.98) — *3 90,018 (28.7)
Dementia 17,146 (0.19) — *3 4789 (1.52)
Cerebrovascular disease 432,804 (4.71) — *3 102,466 (32.6)
Chronic pulmonary disease 1,407,149 (15.3) — *3 143,261 (45.6)
Rheumatic disease 133,504 (1.45) — *3 29,384 (9.35)
Peptic ulcer disease 729,083 (7.94) — *3 141,332 (45.0)
Hemiplegia/paraplegia 15,775 (0.17) — *3 8865 (2.82)
Renal disease 81,098 (0.88) — *3 44,215 (14.1)
AIDS 793 (0.01) — *3 793 (0.25)
Mild liver disease 859,478 (9.36) — *3 146,447 (46.6)
Moderate or severe liver disease 7227 (0.08) — *3 5457 (1.74)
Diabetes without chronic complication 325,131 (3.54) — *3 53,467 (17.0)
Diabetes with chronic complication 222,362 (2.42) — *3 86,165 (27.4)
Tumor/lymphoma/leukemia 368,337 (4.01) — *3 111,033 (35.3)
Metastatic tumor 34,480 (0.38) — *3 34,480 (11.1)
Other diagnosed disease, n (%)
Hypertension 2,160,064 (23.5) 738,737 (12.8) 209,935 (66.8)
Dyslipidemia 2,136,030 (23.3) 658,745 (11.4) 209,149 (66.6)
Hyperuricemia or Gout 672,985 (7.33) 216,817 (3.75) 76,534 (24.4)

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range; IQ) for TG, or n (%). Statistical significance of difference between CCI = 0 and CCI ≥ 4 was compared using analysis of co-variance adjusting for S-age. Analysis of co-variance for categorical variables was conducted after conversion to continuous variables. Significant differences were observed in all continuous and categorical variables between CCI categories (all p < 0.0001). Note: *1—regular exercise defined as ≥30 min at least twice a week; *2—regular drinking defined as drinking every day or drinking occasionally; *3—no individuals in this category. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; GTP, γ-glutamyl transferase; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; S-age, substituted age; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TG, triglycerides.

Table 4 and Table 5 present the 30 most frequently diagnosed diseases and conditions, stratified by CCI category (0 or ≥4) and age group (40–44 or 70–74 years). Supplementary Tables S5–S8 provide extended rankings, including the 100 most frequently diagnosed diseases and conditions and those with a prevalence greater than 1%. Accordingly, key findings are summarized in Table 4 and Table 5, whereas detailed results are shown in Supplementary Tables S5–S8. In individuals with CCI = 0 and age 40–44 (Table 4), the three leading diseases were allergic rhinitis, acute bronchitis and astigmatism. Among cardiometabolic diseases, hypertension was ranked 22nd in the group with CCI = 0, aged 40–44. In individuals with CCI = 0, aged 70–74 (Table 4), the three most-diagnosed diseases were hypertension, allergic rhinitis and cataract. Among cardiometabolic diseases, hyperlipidemia was the 8th leading comorbidity and unspecified diabetes mellitus was ranked 22nd. In individuals with CCI ≥ 4, aged 40–44 (Table 5), the most prevalent diseases were allergic rhinitis, followed by hypertension, asthmatic bronchitis and unspecified diabetes mellitus. In individuals with CCI ≥ 4, aged 70–74 (Table 5), the most prevalent diseases were hypertension, followed by unspecified diabetes mellitus, allergic rhinitis and hyperlipidemia. Among both CCI groups, individuals aged 40–44 years had a higher prevalence of allergic rhinitis, asthmatic bronchitis, acute bronchitis, and acute upper respiratory infection than individuals aged 70–74 years (all p < 0.05 using Student’s t-test; Table 4 and Table 5). Moreover, individuals aged 70–74 years had a higher prevalence of hypertension, cataract, allergic conjunctivitis, hypermetropic astigmatism, astigmatism, chronic gastritis, hyperlipidemia, unspecified diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia than individuals aged 40–44 years (all p < 0.05 using Student’s t-test; Table 4 and Table 5). However, in groups with CCI ≥ 4, there were no significant differences between individuals aged 40–44 and those aged 70–74 years in the prevalence of allergic conjunctivitis or fatty liver.

Table 4.

Prevalence of diagnosed diseases in included individuals with CCI = 0.

Order Age 40–44 Age 70–74
Names of Diagnoses N % Names of Diagnoses N % p vs.
Age 40–44
1 Allergic rhinitis 272,164 23.4 Hypertension 150,073 32.7 <0.0001
2 Acute bronchitis 164,332 14.2 Allergic rhinitis 99,031 21.6 <0.0001
3 Astigmatism 162,935 14.0 Cataract 72,065 15.7 <0.0001
4 Allergic conjunctivitis 146,848 12.6 Allergic conjunctivitis 68,161 14.9 <0.0001
5 Acute upper respiratory infection 140,756 12.1 Astigmatism 64,738 14.1 0.03
6 Acute laryngopharyngitis 106,299 9.15 Hypermetropic astigmatism 60,468 13.2 <0.0001
7 Acute sinusitis 77,377 6.66 Chronic gastritis 59,937 13.1 <0.0001
8 Acute pharyngitis 73,295 6.31 Hyperlipidemia 59,789 13.0 <0.0001
9 Gastritis 66,416 5.72 Hypercholesterolemia 59,655 13.0 <0.0001
10 Chronic gastritis 61,911 5.33 Osteoporosis 53,528 11.7 <0.0001
11 Influenza A 60,075 5.17 Acute bronchitis 52,818 11.5 <0.0001
12 Eczema 59,120 5.09 Sleep disorders 50,311 11.0 <0.0001
13 Acute gastritis 51,454 4.43 Gonarthrosis 49,365 10.8 <0.0001
14 Pharyngitis 50,970 4.39 Low back pain 48,351 10.5 <0.0001
15 Low back pain 48,970 4.22 Acute upper respiratory infection 43,928 9.58 <0.0001
16 Reflux esophagitis 38,610 3.33 Gastritis 40,727 8.88 <0.0001
17 Sleep disorders 36,507 3.14 Reflux esophagitis 40,289 8.79 <0.0001
18 Atopic dermatitis 36,239 3.12 Constipation 38,816 8.47 <0.0001
19 Asteatosis 33,717 2.90 Dry eye syndrome 38,222 8.34 <0.0001
20 Asteatosis eczema 33,384 2.88 Eczema 36,761 8.02 <0.0001
21 Dry eye syndrome 33,104 2.85 Dyslipidemia 33,061 7.21 <0.0001
22 Hypertension 33,087 2.85 Unspecified diabetes mellitus 32,706 7.13 <0.0001
23 Conjunctivitis 32,106 2.77 Conjunctivitis 29,533 6.44 <0.0001
24 Common cold 30,733 2.65 Presbyopia 27,741 6.05 <0.0001
25 Leiomyoma of uterus 30,723 2.65 Glaucoma 25,718 5.61 <0.0001
26 Iron deficiency anemia 29,392 2.53 Lumbar spondylosis deformans 24,741 5.40 <0.0001
27 Constipation 28,894 2.49 Acute laryngopharyngitis 24,457 5.33 <0.0001
28 Influenza, virus not identified 28,531 2.46 Lumbar spinal stenosis 23,778 5.19 <0.0001
29 Diarrhea 28,295 2.44 Hyperplasia of prostate 23,515 5.13 <0.0001
30 Chronic sinusitis 27,659 2.38 Disorder of peripheral nervous system 23,267 5.07 <0.0001

The 30 most-diagnosed diseases and conditions in all included individuals are described. p values between age categories were calculated by using Student’s t-test. Student’s t-test was conducted after conversion to continuous variables. ICD-10: International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision.

Table 5.

Prevalence of diagnosed diseases in the individuals with CCI ≥ 4 (age-adjusted CCI ≥ 5 and CCI ≥ 8 in aged 40–44 and 70–74).

Order Age 40–44 Age 70–74
Names of Diagnoses N % Names of Diagnoses N % p vs. Age 40–44
1 Allergic rhinitis 5471 52.5 Hypertension 75,155 72.2 <0.0001
2 Hypertension 4155 39.9 Unspecified diabetes mellitus 50,906 48.9 <0.0001
3 Asthmatic bronchitis 3598 34.5 Allergic rhinitis 45,100 43.3 <0.0001
4 Unspecified diabetes mellitus 3564 34.2 Hyperlipidemia 42,306 40.6 <0.0001
5 Gastric ulcer 3557 34.2 Gastric ulcer 41,390 39.8 <0.0001
6 Acute bronchitis 3271 31.4 Chronic gastritis 38,749 37.2 <0.0001
7 Astigmatism 3064 29.4 Constipation 38,507 37.0 <0.0001
8 Chronic gastritis 2917 28.0 Hypercholesterolemia 35,818 34.4 <0.0001
9 Low back pain 2864 27.5 Low back pain 32,468 31.2 <0.0001
10 Constipation 2718 26.1 Reflux esophagitis 32,060 30.8 <0.0001
11 Acute upper respiratory infection 2682 25.8 Sleep disorders 31,490 30.2 <0.0001
12 Hyperlipidemia 2631 25.3 Cataract 27,519 26.4 <0.0001
13 Allergic conjunctivitis 2592 24.9 Asthmatic bronchitis 26,650 25.6 <0.0001
14 Sleep disorders 2416 23.2 Astigmatism 26,590 25.5 <0.0001
15 Reflux esophagitis 2285 21.9 Type 2 diabetes mellitus 25,688 24.7 <0.0001
16 Hyperuricemia 2247 21.6 Allergic conjunctivitis 25,030 24.0 n.s
17 Liver dysfunction 2142 20.6 Angina pectoris 24,427 23.5 <0.0001
18 Iron deficiency anemia 2111 20.3 Acute bronchitis 24,399 23.4 <0.0001
19 Hypercholesterolemia 2080 20.0 Osteoporosis 24,310 23.3 <0.0001
20 Type 2 diabetes mellitus 2027 19.5 Intractable reflux esophagitis with maintenance therapy 23,889 22.9 <0.0001
21 Fatty liver 1944 18.7 Hypermetropic astigmatism 23,229 22.3 <0.0001
22 Gastritis 1767 17.0 Dyslipidemia 21,834 21.0 <0.0001
23 Eczema 1766 17.0 Hyperuricemia 21,227 20.4 <0.0001
24 Acute laryngopharyngitis 1733 16.6 Hyperplasia of prostate 19,876 19.1 <0.0001
25 Dyslipidemia 1679 16.1 Gonarthrosis 19,659 18.9 <0.0001
26 Pharyngitis 1564 15.0 Gastritis 19,308 18.5 <0.0001
27 Intractable reflux esophagitis with maintenance therapy 1546 14.8 Fatty liver 19,300 18.5 n.s
28 Bronchitis 1524 14.6 Eczema 18,664 17.9 <0.0001
29 Acute pharyngitis 1293 12.4 Disorder of peripheral nervous system 18,571 17.8 <0.0001
30 Asteatosis 1226 11.8 Acute upper respiratory infection 18,374 17.6 <0.0001

The 30 most-diagnosed diseases and conditions in the included individuals with CCI ≥ 4 (age-adjusted CCI ≥ 5 and CCI ≥ 8 in individuals aged 40–44 and 70–74) are described. p values between age categories were calculated by using Student’s t-test. Student’s t-test was conducted after conversion to continuous variables. ICD-10: International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision.

Among both age groups, individuals in the CCI ≥ 4 group had a higher prevalence of all diseases than those in the CCI = 0 group (all p < 0.001 using Student’s t-test). Moreover, individuals with CCI ≥ 4 who were in the early 40s age group had a higher prevalence of nearly all diseases in comparison with individuals in the CCI = 0 group who were in their early 70s; this was with the exception of age-related diseases such as cataract, hypermetropic astigmatism, osteoporosis, gonarthrosis, and lumbar spondylosis deformans.

Notably, logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the CCI ≥ 4 and age 40–44 group had a higher prevalence of many diseases compared with the CCI = 0 and age 70–74 group (Table S22). Elevated risks were particularly pronounced for cardiometabolic diseases, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. In addition, increased odds were observed for gastrointestinal conditions (e.g., gastritis and constipation), psychiatric disorders (e.g., depressive episodes), and other conditions such as iron deficiency anemia and hypothyroidism. Table 6 shows the prevalence of diagnosed diseases stratified by CCI category (0 or ≥4) and age group (40–44 or 70–74 years). All differences between the CCI categories and the age groups were statistically significant using χ2 tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Individuals in the CCI ≥4, aged 40–44 group had a higher prevalence of all diseases compared with those in the CCI = 0, aged 70–74 group (all adjusted p < 0.007).

Table 6.

The prevalence of diagnosed diseases between CCI category (0 or ≥4) and age group (40–44 or 70–74 years).

CCI = 0 CCI ≥ 4
Diagnosed Diseases Age 40–44
n = 1,161,138
Age 70–74
n = 458,479
Age 40–44
n = 10,417
Age 70–74
n = 104,115
Type 2 diabetes mellitus 2389 (0.21) 7182 (1.57) 2027 (19.5) 25,688 (24.7)
Hypertension 33,087 (2.85) 150,073 (32.7) 4156 (39.9) 75,156 (72.2)
Hyperlipidemia 17,031 (1.47) 59,789 (13.0) 2631 (25.3) 42,307 (40.6)
Iron deficiency anemia 29,392 (2.53) 5678 (1.24) 2113 (20.3) 14,385 (13.8)
Hypothyroidism 4937 (0.43) 3992 (0.87) 769 (7.38) 5779 (5.55)
Intractable reflux esophagitis 6193 (0.53) 15,361 (3.35) 1547 (14.9) 23,890 (23.0)
Gastritis 66,416 (5.72) 40,727 (8.88) 1767 (17.0) 19,308 (18.5)
Constipation 28,894 (2.49) 38,816 (8.47) 2718 (26.1) 38,508 (37.0)
Diarrhea 28,295 (2.44) 7809 (1.70) 1151 (11.1) 6928 (6.65)
Depressive episodes 22,103 (1.90) 7318 (1.60) 870 (8.35) 5660 (5.44)
Sleep disorders 36,507 (3.14) 50,311 (11.1) 2416 (23.2) 31,490 (30.3)
Anxiety neurosis 11,596 (1.00) 11,815 (2.58) 684 (6.57) 8418 (8.09)

The prevalence of diagnosed diseases was expressed as n (% each group). All differences between age and CCI categories were significant (all p values < 0.007; according to χ2 test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons).

Table 7 and Table 8 show the 30 most frequently prescribed medications, stratified by CCI category (0 or ≥4) and age group (40–44 or 70–74 years). Supplementary Tables S9–S12 provide detailed information on the 50 most frequently prescribed medications. Accordingly, key findings are summarized in Table 7 and Table 8, while extended rankings are presented in Supplementary Tables S9–S12. The three most frequently prescribed medications among included individuals aged 40–44 years were Loxoprofen Sodium Hydrate (60 mg, generic), Rebamipide (100 mg, generic), and L-Carbocisteine (500 mg, generic), in the CCI = 0 and CCI ≥ 4 groups. Similarly, the three most frequently prescribed medications among included individuals aged 70–74 years were Rebamipide (100 mg, generic), Loxoprofen Sodium Hydrate (60 mg, generic), and L-Carbocisteine (500 mg, generic), in both the CCI = 0 and CCI ≥ 4 groups. The most frequently prescribed medication for cardiometabolic disease was Rosuvastatin Calcium (2.5 mg generic); hyperlipidemic agents ranked among the 10 most frequently prescribed medications for included individuals aged 70–74 years in both the CCI = 0 and CCI ≥ 4 groups. Vitamin D (eldecalcitol; 0.75 µg, original) ranked among the 30 most frequently prescribed medications among the included individuals aged 70–74 years in both the CCI = 0 and CCI ≥ 4 groups. Vitamin B12 (mecobalamin; 500 µg, original) was ranked among the 30 most frequently prescribed medications among the individuals in both the 40–44 and 70–74 age groups with CCI ≥ 4, and only among individuals who were aged 70–74 in the CCI = 0 group. Among both CCI groups, individuals aged 40–44 years had a higher prevalence of being prescribed Loxoprofen Sodium Hydrate, Tranexamic Acid, L-Carbocisteine, Acetaminophen, Fexofenadine Hydrochloride, Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide Hydrate, and Cefcapene Pivoxil Hydrochloride Hydrate than individuals aged 70–74 years (all p < 0.05 using Student’s t-test; Table 7 and Table 8). Moreover, individuals aged 70–74 years had a higher prevalence of being prescribed Rebamipide, Rosuvastatin Calcium, and Loxoprofen Sodium Hydrate Tape/Patch than individuals aged 40–44 years (all p < 0.05 using Student’s t-test; Table 7 and Table 8). However, in the CCI ≥ 4 groups, there were no significant differences between individuals aged 40–44 and 70–74 years in the prevalence of Metformin Hydrochloride prescription.

Table 7.

Prevalence of prescribed medications in the individuals with CCI = 0.

Order Age 40–44 Age 70–74
Drug Name N % Drug Name N % p vs.
Age 40–44
1 Loxoprofen Sodium Hydrate 60 mg generic 167,937 14.5 Rebamipide 100 mg generic 57,911 12.6 <0.0001
2 Rebamipide 100 mg generic 136,023 11.7 Loxoprofen Sodium Hydrate 60 mg generic 50,465 11.0 <0.0001
3 L-Carbocisteine 500 mg generic 129,329 11.1 L-Carbocisteine 500 mg generic 29,856 6.51 <0.0001
4 Tranexamic Acid 250 mg generic 94,081 8.10 Loxoprofen Sodium Hydrate Tape/Patch 100 mg generic 29,591 6.45 <0.0001
5 Acetaminophen 200 mg original 93,904 8.09 Acetaminophen 200 mg original 22,217 4.85 <0.0001
6 Clarithromycin 200 mg generic 58,155 5.01 Celecoxib 100 mg original 21,269 4.64 <0.0001
7 Fexofenadine Hydrochloride 60 mg generic 57,177 4.92 Tranexamic Acid 250 mg generic 20,558 4.48 <0.0001
8 Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide Hydrate generic 53,938 4.65 Salicylamide/Acetaminophen/Anhydrous Caffeine/Promethazine Methylenedisalicylate original 18,862 4.11 n.s
9 Cefcapene Pivoxil Hydrochloride Hydrate 100 mg generic 53,901 4.64 Cefcapene Pivoxil Hydrochloride Hydrate 100 mg generic 18,316 3.99 <0.0001
10 Salicylamide/Acetaminophen/Anhydrous Caffeine/Promethazine Methylenedisalicylate original 48,128 4.14 Rosuvastatin Calcium 2.5 mg generic 18,241 3.98 <0.0001
11 L-Carbocisteine 250 mg generic 48,103 4.14 Fexofenadine Hydrochloride 60 mg generic 17,850 3.89 <0.0001
12 Bilastine 20 mg original 45,106 3.88 Olopatadine Hydrochloride Solution 0.1% original 17,764 3.87 <0.0001
13 Cefditoren Pivoxil 100 mg generic 44,726 3.85 Eldecalcitol 0.75 µg original 16,437 3.59 <0.0001
14 Olopatadine Hydrochloride Solution 0.1% original 40,048 3.45 Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide Hydrate 15 mg generic 15,710 3.43 <0.0001
15 Levocetirizine Hydrochloride 5 mg original 39,337 3.39 L-Carbocisteine 250 mg generic 14,573 3.18 <0.0001
16 Loxoprofen Sodium Hydrate 60 mg original 38,658 3.33 Loxoprofen Sodium Hydrate 60 mg original 14,506 3.16 <0.0001
17 Acetaminophen 300 mg original 36,784 3.17 Diquafosol Sodium Solution 3% original 12,164 2.65 <0.0001
18 Acetaminophen 500 mg original 35,377 3.05 Ketoprofen Tapes 40 mg original 11,865 2.59 <0.0001
19 Fluticasone Furoate 27.5 µg metered Nasal Spray original 34,322 2.96 Mecobalamin 500 µg original 11,560 2.52 <0.0001
20 Tipepidine Hibenzate 20 mg original 33,988 2.93 Heparinoid cream/lotion/spray/gel 0.3% generic 11,426 2.49 <0.0001
21 Dequalinium Chloride Troches 0.25 mg generic 33,605 2.89 Bilastine 20 mg original 11,089 2.42 <0.0001
22 Montelukast Sodium 10 mg generic 33,553 2.89 Dequalinium Chloride 0.25 mg generic 10,812 2.36 <0.0001
23 Bepotastine Besilate 10 mg generic 32,419 2.79 Betamethasone Valerate/Gentamicin Sulfate Ointment 0.12% original 10,607 2.31 <0.0001
24 Dihydrocodeine Phosphate/dL-Methylephedrine Hydrochloride/
Chlorpheniramine Maleate original
32,400 2.79 Levocetirizine Hydrochloride 5 mg original 10,479 2.29 <0.0001
25 Baloxavir Marboxil 20 mg original 32,280 2.78 Loxoprofen Sodium Hydrate Tapes 100 mg original 10,412 2.27 <0.0001
26 Clostridium butyricum original 28,308 2.44 Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide Hydrate 15 mg original 9813 2.14 <0.05
27 Tranexamic Acid 500 mg generic 28,023 2.41 Rebamipide 100 mg original 9491 2.07 <0.0001
28 L-Carbocisteine 500 mg original 26,753 2.30 Acetaminophen 300 mg original 9362 2.04 <0.0001
29 Garenoxacin Mesilate Hydrate 200 mg original 26,159 2.25 Tipepidine Hibenzate 20 mg original 9247 2.02 <0.0001
30 Antibiotics-Resistant Lactic Acid Bacteriae original 25,988 2.24 Heparinoid Ointment 0.3% original 8859 1.93 <0.0001

The 30 most-prescribed medications are described according to their therapeutic category, nonproprietary names, whether they are original or generic products, and their dosage. p values between age categories were calculated by using the χ2 test.

Table 8.

Prevalence of prescribed medications in the individuals with CCI ≥ 4 (age-adjusted CCI ≥ 5 and CCI ≥ 8 in individuals aged 40–44 and 70–74).

Order Age 40–44 Age 70–74
Drug Name N % Drug Name N % p vs. Age 40–44
1 Loxoprofen Sodium Hydrate 60 mg generic 3059 29.4 Rebamipide 100 mg generic 22,923 22.0 <0.0001
2 Rebamipide 100 mg generic 2784 26.7 Loxoprofen Sodium Hydrate 60 mg generic 19,471 18.7 <0.0001
3 L-Carbocisteine 500 mg generic 2549 24.5 L-Carbocisteine 500 mg generic 15,925 15.3 <0.0001
4 Acetaminophen 200 mg original 1785 17.1 Aspirin 100 mg original 13,401 12.9 <0.0001
5 Tranexamic Acid 250 mg generic 1679 16.1 Acetaminophen 200 mg original 10,970 10.5 <0.0001
6 Montelukast Sodium 10 mg generic 1450 13.9 Rosuvastatin Calcium 2.5 mg generic 9777 9.39 <0.0001
7 Clarithromycin generic 1310 12.6 Esomeprazole Magnesium Hydrate 20 mg original 9270 8.90 <0.0001
8 Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide Hydrate 15 mg generic 1192 11.4 Salicylamide/Acetaminophen/Anhydrous Caffeine/Promethazine Methylenedisalicylate original 9007 8.65 <0.0001
9 Salicylamide/Acetaminophen/Anhydrous Caffeine/Promethazine Methylenedisalicylate original 1173 11.26 Tranexamic Acid 250 mg generic 8505 8.17 <0.0001
10 Cefcapene Pivoxil Hydrochloride Hydrate 100 mg generic 1002 9.62 Celecoxib 100 mg original 8319 7.99 <0.0001
11 L-Carbocisteine 250 mg generic 943 9.05 Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide Hydrate 15 mg generic 7964 7.65 <0.0001
12 Loxoprofen Sodium Hydrate 60 mg original 923 8.86 Cefcapene Pivoxil Hydrochloride Hydrate 100 mg generic 7599 7.30 <0.0001
13 Dihydrocodeine Phosphate/dL-Methylephedrine Hydrochloride/
Chlorpheniramine Maleate original
909 8.73 L-Carbocisteine 250 mg generic 7390 7.10 <0.0001
14 Acetaminophen 500 mg original 888 8.53 Montelukast Sodium 10 mg generic 7208 6.92 <0.0001
15 Bilastine 20 mg original 819 7.86 Mecobalamin 500 µg original 6927 6.65 <0.0001
16 Acetaminophen 300 mg original 798 7.66 Magnesium Oxide 330 mg generic 6579 6.32 <0.0001
17 Dequalinium Chloride Troches 0.25 mg generic 775 7.44 Loxoprofen Sodium Hydrate 60 mg original 6391 6.14 <0.0001
18 Clostridium butyricum original 772 7.41 Olopatadine Hydrochloride Solution 0.1% original 6260 6.01 <0.05
19 Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide Hydrate 15 mg original 770 7.39 Ketoprofen Tapes 40 mg original 6241 5.99 <0.0001
20 Esomeprazole Magnesium Hydrate 20 mg original 770 7.39 Heparinoid cream/lotion/spray/gel 0.3% generic 6130 5.89 n.s
21 Levocetirizine Hydrochloride 5 mg original 769 7.38 Eldecalcitol 0.75 µg original 5546 5.33 <0.0001
22 L-Carbocisteine 500 mg original 753 7.23 Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide Hydrate 15 mg original 5530 5.31 <0.0001
23 Fluticasone Furoate 27.5 µg metered Nasal Spray original 748 7.18 Sitagliptin Phosphate Hydrate 50 mg original 5426 5.21 <0.0001
24 Olopatadine Hydrochloride Solution 0.1% original 704 6.76 Dequalinium Chloride Troches 0.25 mg generic 5393 5.18 <0.0001
25 Tipepidine Hibenzate 20 mg original 690 6.63 Vonoprazan Fumarate 10 mg original 5375 5.16 <0.0001
26 Heparinoid Cream/Lotion/Spray/Gel 0.3% generic 662 6.36 Febuxostat 10 mg original 5188 4.98 <0.001
27 Rosuvastatin Calcium 2.5 mg generic 635 6.10 Loxoprofen Sodium Hydrate Tapes 100 mg original 5094 4.89 <0.0001
28 Prednisolone 5 mg original 633 6.08 Acetaminophen 300 mg original 5086 4.89 <0.0001
29 Garenoxacin Mesilate Hydrate 200 mg original 628 6.03 L-Carbocisteine 500 mg original 4962 4.77 <0.0001
30 Febuxostat 10 mg original 597 5.73 Metformin Hydrochloride 250 mg original 4853 4.66 n.s

The 30 most-prescribed medications are described according to their therapeutic categories, nonproprietary names, whether they are original or generic products, and their dosage. p values between age categories were calculated by using the χ2 test.

Therapeutic categories were allocated according to the package insert or the Prescription Medications in Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency’s search system [20].

4. Discussion

In this study, we examined the prevalence of nearly all comorbidities and concomitant medications according to CCI scores and age groups among middle-aged Japanese individuals using a real-world administrative database. Within the same CCI categories, individuals aged 40–44 years were found to more frequently have allergic rhinitis and communicable diseases such as upper respiratory infections. In contrast, those aged 70–74 years more often had cardiometabolic and other chronic conditions (Table 4 and Table 5). However, logistic regression analysis further demonstrated that young individuals with more comorbidities had a higher prevalence of several conditions, including communicable diseases, musculoskeletal disorders, gastrointestinal symptoms, iron deficiency anemia, and psychiatric disorders, compared with older individuals with no comorbidities (Table S22). These results suggest that certain conditions may be associated with mortality risk, regardless of age. Particularly, iron deficiency anemia showed one of the strongest associations. Considering that iron deficiency anemia has been associated with increased mortality across multiple causes [30], this finding highlights a clinically meaningful comorbidity that may be overlooked when focusing on conventional CCI-defined conditions. These findings suggested that the CCI may reflect aging processes, particularly those increasing the prevalence of cardiometabolic diseases in younger individuals. Notably, there was a discrepancy between diagnosed diseases and prescribed medications in individuals aged 40–44 years with a CCI ≥ 4. For example, three antidiabetic agents—Sitagliptin Phosphate Hydrate, Linagliptin, and Metformin Hydrochloride—were among the 50 most frequently prescribed medications in older individuals with high comorbidities. However, these medications were not among the top 50 medications prescribed to younger individuals. Although the individuals with more comorbidities were more frequently diagnosed with cardiometabolic diseases regardless of age, whether or not they receive pharmacotherapy for their cardiometabolic diseases may be dependent on their age.

The predominance of anti-inflammatory and gastric medications across all groups is consistent with the high prevalence of related diagnosed conditions, such as allergic rhinitis and gastritis, observed in this study (Table 4 and Table 5). In addition, these medications are commonly prescribed in general internal medicine settings and can be initiated by non-specialists, which likely contributes to their high frequency across age and CCI categories [20]. Additionally, eldecalcitol (vitamin D) was ranked among the five most-prescribed medications only among women aged 70–74 years, which corresponds to a high prevalence of osteoporosis in this age group (Tables S16 and S20). Mecobalamin (vitamin B12), which is prescribed for peripheral neuropathy, neuralgia, and numbness, was ranked among the 30 most-prescribed medications (Table 6 and Table 7). This result was observed not only in older individuals but also in younger individuals with more comorbidities. This finding suggests that treatment with mecobalamin may be associated with greater disease severity and mortality.

This study identified several conditions (such as hypertension, iron deficiency anemia, hypothyroidism, and psychiatric disorders) that were found to be associated with potential mortality risk but which are not included in the CCI. These conditions are, however, accounted for in the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index [6] and the Chronic Disease Score [7,30,31,32], both of which reference a broader range of diseases than the CCI. Although these indices differ in design and purpose, and neither consistently outperforms the CCI in predicting mortality and disease severity [33,34,35,36], their inclusion of these conditions points to certain limitations of the CCI. In particular, sleep disorders, which were the most frequent psychiatric disorders in this study, are not recorded in any of these indices despite evidence linking them to increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality [37,38,39]. These findings suggest that incorporating selected non-CCI conditions into comorbidity assessments may improve their ability to reflect disease severity and mortality risk; this warrants further investigation.

In this study, individuals with high comorbidities had a high prevalence of common communicable diseases, such as acute bronchitis and upper respiratory infection. Because these diseases can induce pneumonia, which is the leading cause of death, the relationship between mortality and common communicable diseases cannot be ignored. In hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia, the CCI is a better predictor of in-hospital mortality than pneumonia-specific indices [36]. Additionally, allergic rhinitis has been associated with chronic systemic inflammatory activity and an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality, suggesting that it may reflect an underlying vulnerability relevant to mortality risk rather than a direct lethal condition [5]. Furthermore, prediction of mortality risk should consider the effect of COVID-19. To date, several risk factors have been identified as having a potential impact on the severity and mortality of COVID-19, including older age, male sex, and underlying comorbidities [40]. In particular, independent risk factors associated with mortality owing to COVID-19 include a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, hypercholesterolemia, and type 2 diabetes [40,41]. A study in South Korea researched the effect of comorbidities on the infection rate and severity of COVID-19, in which CCI was used as a factor in propensity score matching [42].

Dyslipidemia is the most common cardiometabolic risk factor, followed by hypertension [38]. These results suggested that dyslipidemia and hypertension may be associated with mortality risk. However, these are not included neither in the CCI, nor in other comorbidity indices. Additionally, individuals with greater comorbidity had lower LDL-C levels than individuals with no comorbidities in this study (Table 3). The supplemental analyses showed that individuals diagnosed with dyslipidemia who were prescribed medication for dyslipidemia had lower LDL-C levels than those who were not prescribed medication for dyslipidemia. This suggested that statin therapy is highly effective for lowering LDL-C levels (Table S21). In contrast, individuals diagnosed with hypertension had higher SBP and DBP levels than those who were not diagnosed with hypertension, regardless of whether or not they were receiving pharmacotherapy. Additionally, individuals diagnosed with diabetes who were prescribed antidiabetic medication had higher HbA1c levels than those who were not prescribed antidiabetic medication (Table S21). These results suggest that diet and exercise therapy are essential for improving hypertension and diabetes control, in addition to pharmacotherapy. To more precisely predict mortality rates, several complex factors such as major biochemical parameters and medication use should be considered.

The NDB dataset obtained for this study did not include Kampo medicines, so we were unable to directly assess their contribution to the overall medication burden. However, according to the publicly available 5th NDB Open Data Japan in 2018 [43], the proportion of Kampo medicines prescribed (calculated as the total quantity per prescription multiplied by the number of prescription days) accounted for 7.2% of all prescriptions across all age and sex groups. This suggests that the exclusion of Kampo medicines is unlikely to have substantially affected the results of the present study, although their use is relatively more common among older adults.

In this study, we determined CCI using both diagnosed diseases and prescribed medications from the Japanese NDB. Most previous studies have developed algorithms to determine CCI based only on disease diagnosis codes, using administrative claims databases [9,10,22]. However, the original CCI includes criteria that are not distinguishable using the ICD-10, such as pharmacotherapy. The CCI is a comorbidity index that is the most widely used for estimating mortality rate in patients with multiple comorbidities, and it was originally intended for use in longitudinal studies. Several studies have assessed the validity of the CCI as a predictor of mortality in certain individuals, such as those with acute myocardial infarction [44], coronary artery disease [45], ischemic stroke [46], hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis [47], postoperative esophageal cancer [48], acute coronary syndrome [49], and frailty in elderly surgical patients [50]. Additionally, the CCI has been used in outcome studies to predict patient prognosis, including readmission in heart failure [4] and postoperative complications after gynecological cancer surgery [3,51,52]. However, a previous study using in-hospital discharge data suggested that five CCI comorbidities (myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, peptic ulcer disease, and diabetes without chronic complications) were not associated with in-hospital mortality [53]. Understandably, patients survive longer today than they did when the original CCI was developed, owing to advances and improvements in treatments and medical technologies. In fact, various modified CCIs have been developed, which are reweighted indices of comorbidities [2,53]. In the near future, efforts are underway to develop more comprehensive and validated predictors for actual mortality using the most recent Japanese NDB. In the efforts, the disclosed predictors besides the CCI comorbidities should be considered, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, pharmacotherapy including Kampo medicines, and biochemical parameters.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, some medications, including Kampo (herbal) medicines, as well as several CCI components were unavailable in the NDB, such as hospitalization details, New York Heart Association functional class, dialysis, and post-kidney transplant status, which may have led to incomplete assessments of comorbidity severity beyond diagnostic codes (Table S2). Second, some disease labels in the NDB were ambiguous, such as “liver dysfunction” and “diabetes mellitus,” and specialist confirmation was not feasible. This may have led to misclassification in claims-based diagnoses, thereby precluding sensitivity analyses based on validated diagnoses. However, to partially address this issue, we conducted sensitivity analyses by examining the internal consistency of diagnosed chronic metabolic diseases (hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia) between 2016 and 2018 (Table S23). All three diseases showed high sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV (≥0.8), and the kappa coefficients were all above 0.7, indicating acceptable diagnostic stability within the NDB. Third, mortality and other longitudinal outcome data were not available, which prevented direct validation of the CCI against actual outcomes. Consequently, we were also unable to assess the predictive performance of the CCI for mortality or to estimate the specific weights of individual conditions in this population. These issues should be addressed in further studies using linked outcome data. In addition, although this algorithm was based on validated definitions from Charlson, Quan, and Ono [1,6,17], we could not conduct an external validation of the adapted CCI algorithm against independent datasets. Fourth, diagnoses and prescribed medications were identified from a single claim, which may have overestimated prevalence. However, previous validation studies in Japan indicated that definitions using both diagnostic codes and prescription information showed high PPVs, even when derived from single-claim diagnoses [54,55,56]. Further sensitivity analyses using stricter definitions (e.g., ≥2 claims) or linkage with electronic medical record datasets would strengthen future research. Nevertheless, this coding algorithm for defining the CCI was more detailed than conventional methods based solely on ICD-10 codes, and previous studies have demonstrated its good predictive performance (c-statistic ≥ 0.70) for mortality [57]. Fifth, information on income level and hospital type was not available in the dataset, and residual confounding by such factors cannot be excluded. Additionally, surveillance bias, namely individuals with higher CCI are likely to have more frequent healthcare contact leading to increased diagnostic and prescribing opportunity, may have influenced the observed disease prevalence and medication use. Moreover, because the study population consisted of individuals who underwent specific health checkups and did not include welfare recipients, selection bias related to socioeconomic or occupational factors cannot be excluded. Addressing these limitations in future research will strengthen the reliability of the CCI in Japan and enhance its application in epidemiological studies, clinical practice, and health policy development. Sixth, individual-level ages were not available in the NDB, and only 5-year categories were provided. We therefore transformed these into substitute ages for analysis. Accordingly, age-adjusted CCI was calculated based on these categories, which may not fully reflect individual age differences. Finally, because this study is an exploratory survey of thousands of diseases and medications, formal corrections for multiple testing were not applied. These results should be interpreted cautiously and require confirmation in future hypothesis-driven studies that implement appropriate multiplicity control.

5. Conclusions

This study identified comorbidities and concomitant medications that are over-looked in conventional indices for predicting mortality, particularly allergic rhinitis and common communicable conditions such as acute bronchitis and upper respiratory infections. These results highlight potential opportunities to refine comorbidity indices by incorporating additional conditions that may influence prognoses. Furthermore, this analysis of a real-world Japanese administrative database demonstrated age- and CCI-specific patterns of comorbidities and pharmacotherapy, suggesting that the CCI may reflect aging processes while also supporting practitioners in identifying young individuals with multiple comorbidities who can be considered high risk. These findings are valuable for epidemiological studies using real-world databases and may inform health policy by providing novel insights into comorbidity, pharmacotherapy, clinical parameters, and underlying mechanisms concerning mortality. Moreover, these findings warrant further investigation to improve risk stratification and guide the development of more comprehensive comorbidity scoring systems in Japan.

Abbreviations

ALT alanine aminotransferase
AST aspartate aminotransferase
BMI body mass index
CCI Charlson Comorbidity Index
DBP diastolic blood pressure
DKA diabetic ketoacidosis
GTP γ-glutamyl transferase
HbA1c glycated hemoglobin
HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
HHS hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome
ICD-10 International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision
LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
MHLW Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
NDB The Japan National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups
S-age substituted age
SBP systolic blood pressure
TG triglycerides

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/epidemiologia7020034/s1, Figure S1: Conceptual model of the study; Table S1: Percentile values of clinical parameters from the NDB in the seven prefectures of the Kanto region; Table S2: Definitions of Charlson Comorbidity Index; Table S3: Prevalence of diagnosed diseases in all included individuals; Table S4: Prevalence of prescribed medications in all included individuals; Table S5: Prevalence of diagnosed diseases in the CCI = 0, 40–44 age group; Table S6: Prevalence of diagnosed diseases in the CCI = 0, 70–74 age group; Table S7: Prevalence of diagnosed diseases in the CCI ≥ 4, 40–44 age group; Table S8: Prevalence of diagnosed diseases in the CCI ≥ 4, 70–74 age group; Table S9: Prevalence of prescribed medications in the CCI = 0, 40–44 age group; Table S10: Prevalence of prescribed medications in the CCI = 0, 70–74 age group; Table S11: Prevalence of prescribed medications in the CCI ≥ 4, 40–44 age group; Table S12: Prevalence of prescribed medications in the CCI ≥ 4, 70–74 age group; Table S13: Prevalence of diagnosed diseases among men aged 40–44 years; Table S14: Prevalence of diagnosed diseases among men aged 70–74 years; Table S15: Prevalence of diagnosed diseases among women aged 40–44 years; Table S16: Prevalence of diagnosed diseases among women aged 70–74 years; Table S17: Prevalence of prescribed medications among men aged 40–44 years; Table S18: Prevalence of prescribed medications among men aged 70–74 years; Table S19: Prevalence of prescribed medications among women aged 40–44 years; Table S20: Prevalence of prescribed medications among women aged 70–74 years; Table S21: Proportion of individuals diagnosed among those prescribed specific medications; Table S22: Associations of CCI ≥ 4 in age 40–44 group with diagnosed diseases compared with CCI = 0 in age 70–74 group; Table S23: Consistency of diagnosed diseases between 2016 and 2018 (sensitivity, specificity, and kappa coefficient).

Author Contributions

A.S. and K.N. contributed to the overall study design. A.S. and K.N. contributed to the interpretation of the initial results and discussion of the literature. A.S. and K.N. prepared the data and software. A.S. prepared the first draft of the manuscript, and both authors read, edited, and approved the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Ethics Committee of Japan Women’s University (No. 513; 11 May 2022) and the MHLW of Japan (No. 2320; 29 September 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was not required because of the use of anonymous data from the MHLW of Japan, as part of its nationwide program involving the provision of medical data to third parties. The study protocol is available online (https://www.jwu.ac.jp/unv/education-research/NationalDatabase.html; accessed on 1 February 2026).

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because access to the National Database is regulated by the MHLW of Japan. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by The Research Institute in Japan Women’s University (grant number 84).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Charlson M.E., Pompei P., Ales K.L., MacKenzie C.R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J. Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Charlson M.E., Carrozzino D., Guidi J., Patierno C. Charlson Comorbidity Index: A Critical Review of Clinimetric Properties. Psychother. Psychosom. 2022;91:8–35. doi: 10.1159/000521288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kaneko T., Hirakawa K., Fushimi K. Relationship between peri-operative outcomes and hospital surgical volume of total hip arthroplasty in Japan. Health Policy. 2014;117:48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aizawa H., Imai S., Fushimi K. Factors associated with 30-day readmission of patients with heart failure from a Japanese administrative database. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2015;15:134. doi: 10.1186/s12872-015-0127-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rhee T.M., Choi E.K., Han K.D., Lee S.R., Oh S. Impact of the Combinations of Allergic Diseases on Myocardial Infarction and Mortality. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2021;9:872–880.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Elixhauser A., Steiner C., Harris D.R., Coffey R.M. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med. Care. 1998;36:8–27. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Von Korff M., Wagner E.H., Saunders K. A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy data. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1992;45:197–203. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90016-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fukuma S., Iizuka T., Ikenoue T., Tsugawa Y. Association of the National Health Guidance Intervention for Obesity and Cardiovascular Risks With Health Outcomes Among Japanese Men. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020;180:1630–1637. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Quan H., Sundararajan V., Halfon P., Fong A., Burnand B., Luthi J.C., Saunders L.D., Beck C.A., Feasby T.E., Ghali W.A. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med. Care. 2005;43:1130–1139. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Deyo R.A., Cherkin D.C., Ciol M.A. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1992;45:613–619. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Romano P.S., Roos L.L., Jollis J.G. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: Differing perspectives. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1993;46:1075–1079. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90103-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sundararajan V., Henderson T., Perry C., Muggivan A., Quan H., Ghali W.A. New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2004;57:1288–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hirose N., Ishimaru M., Morita K., Yasunaga H. A review of studies using the Japanese National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups. Ann. Clin. Epidemiol. 2020;2:13–26. doi: 10.37737/ace.2.1_13. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Study of Seven Kanto Prefectures Using the National Database. [(accessed on 1 February 2026)]. Available online: https://mcm-www.jwu.ac.jp/~NDB-K7Ps/blog/?page_id=2.
  • 15.Tsushita K., Hosler A.S., Miura K., Ito Y., Fukuda T., Kitamura A., Tatara K. Rationale and Descriptive Analysis of Specific Health Guidance: The Nationwide Lifestyle Intervention Program Targeting Metabolic Syndrome in Japan. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2018;25:308–322. doi: 10.5551/jat.42010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Data of Specific Health Checkups and Health Guidance Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (Japanese) [(accessed on 1 February 2026)]. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/newpage_03092.html.
  • 17.Nakajima K., Iwane T., Higuchi R., Shibata M., Takada K., Uda J., Anan M., Sugiyama M., Nakamura T. Kanagawa Investigation of the Total Check-up Data from the National database (KITCHEN): Protocol for data-driven population-based repeated cross-sectional and 6-year cohort studies. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e023323. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ando T., Ooba N., Mochizuki M., Koide D., Kimura K., Lee S.L., Setoguchi S., Kubota K. Positive predictive value of ICD-10 codes for acute myocardial infarction in Japan: A validation study at a single center. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2018;18:895. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3727-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tamiya R., Miyake M., Kido A., Hiragi S., Tamura H., Kuroda T., Tsujikawa A. Validation study of the claims-based definition for age-related macular degeneration at a single university hospital in Japan. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2021;65:388–394. doi: 10.1007/s10384-021-00816-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Search System for Prescription Drugs; Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. [(accessed on 1 February 2026)]. Available online: https://www.pmda.go.jp/PmdaSearch/iyakuSearch/
  • 21.Teramoto T., Sasaki J., Ueshima H., Egusa G., Kinoshita M., Shimamoto K., Daida H., Biro S., Hirobe K., Funahashi T., et al. Executive summary of Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) guideline for diagnosis and prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases for Japanese. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2007;14:45–50. doi: 10.5551/jat.14.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ono S., Sasabuchi Y., Yamana H., Yokota I., Okada A., Matsui H., Itai S., Yonenaga K., Tonosaki K., Watanabe R., et al. Weight loss and functional decline in older Japanese people: A cohort study using large-scale claims data. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2024;120:105354. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2024.105354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.He R., Zhang K., Li H., Fu S., Chen Z., Gu M. Impact of Charlson Comorbidity Index on in-hospital mortality of patients with hyperglycemic crises: A propensity score matching analysis. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2024;30:977–988. doi: 10.1111/jep.14005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Charlson M., Szatrowski T.P., Peterson J., Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1994;47:1245–1251. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.O’Hare A.M., Berry K., Fan V.S., Crothers K., Eastment M.C., Dominitz J.A., Shah J.A., Green P., Locke E., Ioannou G.N. Age differences in the association of comorbid burden with adverse outcomes in SARS-CoV-2. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21:415. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02340-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sekine A., Nakajima K. Agreement in All-in-One Dataset between Diagnosis and Prescribed Medication for Common Cardiometabolic Diseases in the NDB-K7Ps. Epidemiologia. 2023;4:370–381. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia4040034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Website Regarding the Use of The National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups (NDB) [(accessed on 1 February 2026)]. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/iryouhoken/reseputo/index.html.
  • 28.Study of Seven Kanto Prefectures Using the National Database (Information Disclosure) [(accessed on 1 February 2026)]. Available online: https://www.jwu.ac.jp/unv/education-research/NationalDatabase.html.
  • 29.Cannon E.J., Misialek J.R., Buckley L.F., Aboelsaad I.A.F., Ballantyne C.M., Leister J., Pankow J.S., Lutsey P.L. Anemia, Iron Deficiency, and Cause-Specific Mortality: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Gerontology. 2024;70:1023–1032. doi: 10.1159/000539973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Clark D.O., Von Korff M., Saunders K., Baluch W.M., Simon G.E. A chronic disease score with empirically derived weights. Med. Care. 1995;33:783–795. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199508000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Putnam K.G., Buist D.S., Fishman P., Andrade S.E., Boles M., Chase G.A., Goodman M.J., Gurwitz J.H., Platt R., Raebel M.A., et al. Chronic disease score as a predictor of hospitalization. Epidemiology. 2002;13:340–346. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200205000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Iommi M., Rosa S., Fusaroli M., Rucci P., Fantini M.P., Poluzzi E. Modified-Chronic Disease Score (M-CDS): Predicting the individual risk of death using drug prescriptions. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0240899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schneeweiss S., Wang P.S., Avorn J., Glynn R.J. Improved comorbidity adjustment for predicting mortality in Medicare populations. Health Serv. Res. 2003;38:1103–1120. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yan Y., Birman-Deych E., Radford M.J., Nilasena D.S., Gage B.F. Comorbidity indices to predict mortality from Medicare data: Results from the national registry of atrial fibrillation. Med. Care. 2005;43:1073–1077. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182477.29129.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yang C.C., Fong Y., Lin L.C., Que J., Ting W.C., Chang C.L., Wu H.M., Ho C.H., Wang J.J., Huang C.I. The age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index is a better predictor of survival in operated lung cancer patients than the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2018;53:235–240. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bahlis L.F., Diogo L.P., Fuchs S.C. Charlson Comorbidity Index and other predictors of in-hospital mortality among adults with community-acquired pneumonia. J. Bras. Pneumol. 2021;47:e20200257. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20200257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bertisch S.M., Pollock B.D., Mittleman M.A., Buysse D.J., Bazzano L.A., Gottlieb D.J., Redline S. Insomnia with objective short sleep duration and risk of incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: Sleep Heart Health Study. Sleep. 2018;41:zsy047. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsy047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chung P.C., Hu T.H., Chiao C.H., Hwang J.S., Chan T.C. The long-term effects of cardiometabolic risk factors on mortality and life expectancy: Evidence from a health check-up cohort study. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2025;25:27. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04469-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Azarian M., Ramezani A., Sharafkhaneh A., Maghsoudi A., Kryger M., Thomas R.J., Westover M.B., Razjouyan J. The Association between All-cause Mortality and Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults: A U-Shaped Curve. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2025;22:581–590. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202407-755OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang J.J., Dong X., Liu G.H., Gao Y.D. Risk and Protective Factors for COVID-19 Morbidity, Severity, and Mortality. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2023;64:90–107. doi: 10.1007/s12016-022-08921-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Grasselli G., Greco M., Zanella A., Albano G., Antonelli M., Bellani G., Bonanomi E., Cabrini L., Carlesso E., Castelli G., et al. Risk Factors Associated with Mortality Among Patients with COVID-19 in Intensive Care Units in Lombardy, Italy. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020;180:1345–1355. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kim J., Park S.H., Kim J.M. Effect of Comorbidities on the Infection Rate and Severity of COVID-19: Nationwide Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022;8:e35025. doi: 10.2196/35025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.5th NDB Open Data Japan in 2018 (Japanese) [(accessed on 1 February 2026)]. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/ndb/opendatasite/index.html.
  • 44.Núñez J.E., Núñez E., Fácila L., Bertomeu V., Llàcer A., Bodí V., Sanchis J., Sanjuán R., Blasco M.L., Consuegra L., et al. Prognostic value of Charlson comorbidity index at 30 days and 1 year after acute myocardial infarction. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2004;57:842–849. doi: 10.1016/S0300-8932(04)77204-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sachdev M., Sun J.L., Tsiatis A.A., Nelson C.L., Mark D.B., Jollis J.G. The prognostic importance of comorbidity for mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2004;43:576–582. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Goldstein L.B., Samsa G.P., Matchar D.B., Horner R.D. Charlson Index comorbidity adjustment for ischemic stroke outcome studies. Stroke. 2004;35:1941–1945. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000135225.80898.1c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fried L., Bernardini J., Piraino B. Charlson comorbidity index as a predictor of outcomes in incident peritoneal dialysis patients. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2001;37:337–342. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.21300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Vendrely V., Launay V., Najah H., Smith D., Collet D., Gronnier C. Prognostic factors in esophageal cancer treated with curative intent. Dig. Liver Dis. 2018;50:991–996. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Radovanovic D., Seifert B., Urban P., Eberli F.R., Rickli H., Bertel O., Puhan M.A., Erne P. Validity of Charlson Comorbidity Index in patients hospitalised with acute coronary syndrome. Insights from the nationwide AMIS Plus registry 2002–2012. Heart. 2014;100:288–294. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Artiles-Armas M., Roque-Castellano C., Conde-Martel A., Marchena-Gómez J. The Comprehensive Complication Index is Related to Frailty in Elderly Surgical Patients. J. Surg. Res. 2019;244:218–224. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.D’oria O., D’auge T.G., Baiocco E., Vincenzoni C., Mancini E., Bruno V., Chiofalo B., Mancari R., Vizza R., Cutillo G., et al. The role of preoperative frailty assessment in patients affected by gynecological cancer: A narrative review. Ital. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2022;34:76–83. doi: 10.36129/jog.2022.34. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Giannini A., Di Donato V., Schiavi M.C., May J., Panici P.B., Congiu M.A. Predictors of postoperative overall and severe complications after surgical treatment for endometrial cancer: The role of the fragility index. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2020;148:174–180. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Quan H., Li B., Couris C.M., Fushimi K., Graham P., Hider P., Januel J.M., Sundararajan V. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2011;173:676–682. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ono Y., Taneda Y., Takeshima T., Iwasaki K., Yasui A. Validity of Claims Diagnosis Codes for Cardiovascular Diseases in Diabetes Patients in Japanese Administrative Database. Clin. Epidemiol. 2020;12:367–375. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S245555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Okui T., Nojiri C., Kimura S., Abe K., Maeno S., Minami M., Maeda Y., Tajima N., Kawamura T., Nakashima N. Performance evaluation of case definitions of type 1 diabetes for health insurance claims data in Japan. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2021;21:52. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01422-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Nishioka Y., Takeshita S., Kubo S., Myojin T., Noda T., Okada S., Ishii H., Imamura T., Takahashi Y. Appropriate definition of diabetes using an administrative database: A cross-sectional cohort validation study. J. Diabetes Investig. 2022;13:249–255. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sundararajan V., Quan H., Halfon P., Fushimi K., Luthi J.C., Burnand B., Ghali W.A. International Methodology Consortium for Coded Health, I. Cross-national comparative performance of three versions of the ICD-10 Charlson index. Med. Care. 2007;45:1210–1215. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181484347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because access to the National Database is regulated by the MHLW of Japan. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Epidemiologia are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES