Abstract
Deep tissue and bloodstream yeast infections are associated with poor outcomes due to rapid progression, antifungal resistance, and immune evasion. Differentiating between wound contamination and true fungal infection remains a clinical challenge, with limited guidance on the use of prophylactic antifungal therapy in this setting. This article presents a rare case of an immunocompetent patient who sustained a degloving hand injury and radius fracture from a bread kneading machine, with subsequent deep tissue cultures growing Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The case underscores the potential risk of fungal infection in occupational injuries involving dough and emphasizes the importance of early identification and consideration of prophylactic antifungal treatment in similar scenarios.
Keywords: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Baker, Degloving Laceration, Wound contaminant, Cellulites
Introduction
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a yeast belonging to the Ascomycetes division and the Saccharomyces class, is commonly found in the human gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts. It also exists in plants and soil and is widely recognized as baker’s or brewer’s yeast due to its extensive use in baking and brewing processes [1].
Previously considered non-pathogenic, S. cerevisiae has been utilized as a probiotic to address antibiotic-related diarrhea and promote the healing of chronic wounds [2]. Nevertheless, this yeast can lead to severe infections in immunocompromised patients, particularly those undergoing immunosuppressive therapy, broad-spectrum antibiotics, chemotherapy, or intravascular catheters [3]. Furthermore, it has been reported to impact immunocompetent hosts, contributing to conditions such as vaginitis and leading to fungemia and osteomyelitis in patients with traumatic injuries [4, 5].
In terms of susceptibility, S. cerevisiae has demonstrated variable resistance to antifungal agents like fluconazole and itraconazole while being sensitive to voriconazole, caspofungin, amphotericin, and flucytosine [1, 6, 7]. This resistance primarily arises from the upregulation of the ERG genes and recombinant efflux pumps, a mechanism it shares with various Candida serotypes, especially the challenging Candida auris [7, 8].
In situations where the barriers of the innate immune system are compromised, allowing microorganisms to breach the skin, muscular fascia, and periosteum, as observed in this case report, it is crucial to give due consideration to antifungal prophylaxis. This is especially important to mitigate or prevent potential complications, such as cellulitis, osteomyelitis, fungemia, and other disseminated infections that are possible with this fungus [3, 5].
Case report
Our case involves a 75-year-old male baker with a previous medical history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and coronary artery disease. He presented at the emergency department after sustaining a degloving crush injury aggravated by thermal damage to his right hand and a unicortical fracture across the radial shaft while operating a bread kneading machine (Fig. 1), (day 0).
Fig. 1.

Clinical Image. Traumatic right-hand degloving lauceratyion injury
Initial radiograph imaging disclosed an acute, non-displaced fracture of the right radial diaphysis (Fig. 2a). Subsequently, the patient underwent a surgical intervention involving copious irrigation, debridement of necrotic tissue, and application of wound vacuum therapy. Tissue biopsy and bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial cultures were obtained, and the patient was commenced on Ceftriaxone 2 g intravenously daily.
Fig. 2.

Radiography (Rx). A- Bone radiograph non-displaced fracture of the right radial diaphysis. B- Interval plate and screw fixation of the radial diaphysis fracture, overlying cast
On the second day after admission, laboratory results showed normal complete blood count, hemoglobin, renal, and liver function tests. Mycological culture of the deep wound after 48 h revealed the presence of small, 2–3 mm, round, smooth, pink colonies in blood agar (Fig. 3A). Additionally, CHROMagar Candida displayed compact 1–2 mm round colonies, exhibiting a smooth purple appearance (Fig. 3B), suggestive of yeast growth. The yeast’s identification was achieved through direct microscopy and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis of the mycological cultures. Consequently, the patient was taken to the operating room, where he underwent a secondary surgical revision, further debridement, an open reduction procedure, and internal fixation of the right radius [Figure 2b].
Fig. 3.

Mycological cultures of deep wound cultures at debridement. A- Small (2–3 mm diameter), round, smooth, pink with white edge colonies of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in blood agar. B- Small (1–2 mm diameter), round, smooth, purple edge colonies Saccharomyces cerevisiae in CHROMagar-Candida
Given concern for high risk of secondary infection in this grossly contaminated wound, the patient was started on an empirical oral regimen involving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 800/160 mg twice daily for five days, alongside fluconazole 500 mg daily (weight-based dosing) for six weeks. Mycological susceptibilities were requested, and the patient was discharged and provided with outpatient follow-up appointments.
Nine days after the initial injury, antifungal susceptibility results became available, revealing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values as follows: amphotericin B 1 mcg/ml, fluconazole 4 mcg/ml, and voriconazole 0.06 mcg/ml (no definitive breakpoints established yet for S. cerevisiae). Following the review of the susceptibility antifungal results, fluconazole was discontinued, and the patient was started on an oral regimen consisting of voriconazole 400 mg two times a day on day one, and subsequently 300 mg two times a day for three months.
Follow-up visits were consistently upheld, ensuring that the voriconazole’s therapeutic range remained within 1–5 µg/ml, which was mostly achieved except for one occasion when levels were subtherapeutic. Except for mild facial and leg edema, the antifungal therapy was well tolerated without any evidence of long-term adverse effects. Wound care management continued with the use of wet-to-dry dressings while on antifungal therapy.
Sixty-four days following the initial injury, the patient exhibited clinical deterioration of his wound. Notably, the dorsal region displayed areas of denuded epidermis, accompanied by exudative fibrinoid thick secretions involving the incision site and edema of the right hand (Fig. 4). This overall picture suggests a wound and soft tissue infection and possible cellulitis.
Fig. 4.

Clinical Image follow-up day 64. Chronic wound site infection: the dorsal region displayed areas of denuded epidermis, exudative fibrinoid thick secretions around the incision site, and edema on the right hand, with concern for early cellulitis
The patient completed a 90-day course of voriconazole, with no additional antibiotics given, resulting in complete regression of the inflammatory process. The wound fully healed, with the patient reporting only a minimal area of residual skin induration. Overall hand function was normal, and the patient was able to return to work (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.

Clinical Image follow-up, day 180, right hand showing complete wound healing with some scarring
Discussion
S. cerevisiae has been recognized as a potential pathogen in both monomicrobial and polymicrobial infections following deep tissue trauma, often leading to bone and joint complications. These cases pose a diagnostic challenge, particularly when the organism is isolated from traumatic wounds, making it difficult to distinguish true infection from contamination. Decisions regarding the initiation of prophylactic antibiotic or antifungal therapy postoperatively remain complex due to the rarity of such cases and the lack of established guidelines.
Although complicated wound infections caused by S. cerevisiae are uncommon, they can occur even in immunocompetent individuals, as demonstrated in our case. This organism should be considered a potential pathogen, particularly in individuals occupationally exposed to baker’s or brewer’s yeast. Even with minimal clinical suspicion, differentiating between colonization and true infection remains challenging [9, 10].
Wound healing is a dynamic process involving hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling phases, with the ultimate goal of restoring tissue integrity. Chronic or complicated wounds—those persisting for more than three months—are frequently associated with poor vascularization, infection, or systemic comorbidities. Wound infections can present with local signs such as erythema, edema, warmth, purulent discharge, or increased pain. In patients with multiple comorbidities, more subtle manifestations such as delayed healing or systemic symptoms may predominate, necessitating a thorough clinical assessment and exclusion of other infection sources [11].
The early recognition of infection is therefore critical, as the mere presence of a microorganism in a wound does not confirm infection; it may instead indicate contamination. Differentiating between the two is essential, as it significantly influences the choice and intensity of clinical management strategies [10, 12].
While S. cerevisiae generally remains susceptible to echinocandins, amphotericin B, and flucytosine, many reports suggest in vitro resistance to azoles, particularly fluconazole [1, 6, 7]. Susceptibility to voriconazole, as reported in some studies, is, however, generally high, with rates above 90% [13, 14]. One of the primary mechanisms of resistance involves alterations in the drug’s binding target, either through genetic modification or overexpression. Similar to Candida albicans, S. cerevisiae shares resistance mechanisms, including mutations in the ERG11 gene, which confer resistance to azoles and polyenes. Echinocandin resistance is primarily mediated through mutations in FKS1, while efflux pump overexpression also contributes to azole resistance by reducing intracellular drug concentrations [8].
Despite early prophylactic treatment, our patient developed signs of wound infection and concern for early cellulitis. This, however, improved with the continuation of antifungal therapy and wound care. It is conceivable that the patient could have fared worse if antifungal therapy had not been initiated after S. cerevisiae was confirmed from tissue culture.
Cutaneous and soft tissue infections (SSTI) caused by S. cerevisiae are exceptionally rare, despite the organism’s ubiquitous use in food and probiotics. One of the earliest reports came from Wilson et al. [15], who described an infection in the vulva in a bread-making woman with apparent transmission to her partner, underscoring the potential for mucocutaneous colonization in otherwise healthy individuals. A decade later, Almanza et al. [16] reported a fulminant case of post-traumatic cellulitis developing within four hours in a wine cellar worker, where occupational exposure to grape-associated S. cerevisiae was implicated as the etiologic agent. Subsequently, Lee et al. [17] documented dermal abscesses in a steroid-treated patient that improved with fluconazole therapy, while Williams et al. [18] described cutaneous septic emboli in an immunocompromised patient with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia, representing secondary skin involvement from fungemia. More recently, Belmourida et al. [19] reported the first primary diffuse maculopapular infection in an immunocompetent patient, highlighting that clinically significant disease is not confined to immunosuppressed hosts.
S. cerevisiae is generally susceptible to echinocandins, amphotericin B, and flucytosine; however, in vitro resistance to azoles, particularly fluconazole, has been frequently reported, largely due to mechanisms shared with Candida albicans, including ERG11 mutations, alterations or overexpression of drug targets, FKS1 mutations conferring echinocandin resistance, and efflux pump overexpression leading to reduced intracellular azole concentrations [1, 6–8]. In our case, the isolate remained susceptible to voriconazole. Although antifungal susceptibility testing was not routinely performed in previously reported cases, larger series demonstrate consistent activity of amphotericin B and flucytosine, variable susceptibility to fluconazole, and overall good activity of echinocandins [18, 19]. Clinical outcomes have been heterogeneous, with successful azole therapy reported in at least one case, while others were limited by incomplete follow-up or disseminated infection [15–17]. Collectively, these findings highlight that although S. cerevisiae skin and soft tissue infections are rare, they should be considered in the differential diagnosis of atypical or treatment-refractory skin infections when common pathogens are not identified; previously reported cases in the English literature are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Published cases of Saccharomyces cerevisiae skin and soft tissue infections
| Manuscript reference | Year | Age/ Gender |
Host factors | Infection type | Microbiology | Antifungal susceptibilities | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson et al. [15] | 1987 | 30 F | Immunocompetent, history of bread baking | Vulval infection, with whitish vaginal discharge | Vaginal discharge cultures grew S. cerevisiae. Test for Candida albicans was negative | Not reported | Fluconazole 50 mg daily for 3 days |
| Lee et al. [15] | 1997 | 62 F | Immunosuppressed (Long-term systemic steroids) | Left thigh deep dermal abscess/nodules | Culture of nodular lesion biopsy grew Saccharomyces spp. | Not reported | Fluconazole 150 mg/day ×14 days |
| Williams et al. [16] | 2007 | 51 F | Immunosuppressed (Relapsed AML M6 subtype, Allogeneic Bone Marrow transplant x 2; Hickman line) | Cutaneous septic emboli and Hickman line infection | Skin biopsy and Hickman line grew S. cerevisiae | Not reported | Not detailed |
| Belmourida et al. [17] | 2021 | 72 F | Immunocompetent | Diffuse chronic maculopapular skin lesions | Cultures of the biopsy of two lesions grew S. cerevisiae | Not reported | None (patient left against medical advice) |
Ultimately, after completing a 90-day course of voriconazole, the patient achieved complete wound healing. He reported only minimal residual skin tightness, with full restoration of hand function and no limitations in daily activities or work.
A key limitation in this case was the initial choice of fluconazole for initial prophylaxis, despite known resistance patterns in some published reports. We chose fluconazole initially, given the evidence of a few reports showing good response to this antifungal [13, 15], the excellent tolerability, and the fact that this fungus isolation represented contamination rather than infection early on. While fluconazole is more convenient and better tolerated, the use of voriconazole from the outset might have been more appropriate given the potential for invasive fungal disease and the general poor susceptibilities reported to fluconazole for S. cerevisiae [18–20]. However, this decision remains debatable, especially in the absence of confirmed infection and considering voriconazole’s need for therapeutic drug monitoring and potential side effects.
In conclusion, we believe that significant fungal deep wound contamination or infection with S. cerevisiae warrants prompt and aggressive treatment, beginning with empirical antifungal therapy—preferably voriconazole or an echinocandin—with subsequent antimicrobial adjustment based on fungal susceptibility results.
Acknowledgements
None.
Abbreviations
- ERG genes
Ergosterol biosynthesis genes
- MALDI
TOF MS–Matrix–Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time–of–Flight Mass Spectrometry
- MIC
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration
- SSTI
Skin and Soft Tissue Infection
- AML
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Author contributions
HS, DHM, BOC, MBA and MA reviewed the literature and drafted the initial manuscript. HS, ALP and MA reviewed the literature and edited the figures and tables. HS, BOC and MBA participated in the discussion and manuscript editing. FA supervised the investigation and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was conducted following the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. Informed consent was obtained from the patient to be included in the study. Every effort has been made to anonymize the case.
Informed consent
Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient to publish this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Muñoz P, Bouza E, Cuenca-Estrella M, et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia: an emerging infectious disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(11):1625–34. 10.1086/429916. Epub 2005 Apr 25. PMID: 15889360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gupta P, Singh YP, Taneja A. A friend or foe in ICU (A case report with Solution). Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019;23(9):430–1. 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23239. PMID: 31645830; PMCID: PMC6775723. Saccharomyces. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aucott JN, Fayen J, Grossnicklas H, Morrissey A, Lederman MM, Salata RA. Invasive infection with Saccharomyces cerevisiae: report of three cases and review. Rev Infect Dis. 1990 May-Jun;12(3):406 – 11. 10.1093/clinids/12.3.406. PMID: 2193348. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 4.Papaemmanouil V, Georgogiannis N, Plega M, et al. Prevalence and susceptibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae causing vaginitis in Greek women. Anaerobe. 2011;17(6):298–9. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.04.008. Epub 2011 Apr 29. PMID: 21549212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Seng P, Cerlier A, Cassagne C, Coulange M, Legré R, Stein A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae osteomyelitis in an immunocompetent Baker. IDCases. 2016;5:1–3. 10.1016/j.idcr.2016.05.002. PMID: 27347482; PMCID: PMC4909721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pérez-Cantero A, Thomson P, Paredes K, Guarro J, Capilla J. Antifungal susceptibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and therapy in a murine model of disseminated infection. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2019 Jan-Mar;36(1):37–40. doi: 10.1016/j.riam.2018.04.004. Epub 2019 Feb 11. PMID: 30765275. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 7.Toepfer S, Lackner M, Keniya MV, Monk BC. Functional expression of Recombinant Candida auris proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae enables Azole susceptibility evaluation and drug discovery. J Fungi (Basel). 2023;9(2):168. 10.3390/jof9020168. PMID: 36836283; PMCID: PMC9960696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee Y, Robbins N, Cowen LE. Molecular mechanisms governing antifungal drug resistance. NPJ Antimicrob Resist. 2023;1(1):5. 10.1038/s44259-023-00007-2. Epub 2023 Jul 17. PMID: 38686214; PMCID: PMC11057204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Souza Goebel C, de Mattos Oliveira F, Severo LC. Infección por Saccharomyces cerevisiae [Saccharomyces cerevisiae infections]. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2013 Jul-Sep;30(3):205-8. Spanish. 10.1016/j.riam.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Apr 11. PMID: 23583718. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 10.Ganesan A, Shaikh F, Bradley W, Tribble DR, Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study Group, et al. Classification of Trauma-Associated invasive fungal infections to support wound treatment decisions. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25(9):1639–47. 10.3201/eid2509.190168. PMID: 31441428; PMCID: PMC6711217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Carville K, Cuddigan J, Fletcher J, et al. Wound infection in clinical practice. Int Wound J. 2008;5(s3):iii–11. 10.1111/j.1742-481x.2008.00488.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Metsemakers WJ, Morgenstern M, McNally MA, et al. Fracture-related infection: A consensus on definition from an international expert group. Injury. 2018;49(3):505–10. 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.040. Epub 2017 Aug 24. PMID: 28867644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Górzyńska A, Kondracka K, Korzeniowska-Kowal A, Nawrot U. Antifungal susceptibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolated from clinical specimens. Pathogens. 2024;13(3):248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yan Z, Fu Y, Tan X, et al. Isolate distribution and antifungal susceptibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the National regional medical center of Southwest China for women and children during 2018–2023. BMC Microbiol. 2024;24:345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wilson JD, Jones BM, Kinghorn GR. Bread-making as a source of vaginal infection with Saccharomyces cerevisiae: report of a case in a woman and apparent transmission to her partner. Sex Transm Dis. 1988;15(1):35–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Almanza L, Debien B, Fontaine B, Brinquin L. Quatre heures pour Un record, Ou Une cellulite vraiment foudroyante: Saccharomyces cerevisiae peut-elle En être La cause? Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1998;17(1):130–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lee HK, et al. A case of opportunistic skin infection with Saccharomyces. Ann Dermatol. 1997;9(1):41–5. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Williams JS, et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae emboli in an immunocompromised patient. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2007;32(4):395–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Belmourida S, et al. Skin infection with Saccharomyces cerevisiae in an immunocompetent patient: an exceptional infection. Our Dermatol Online. 2021;12(4):466–7. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Enache-Angoulvant A, Hennequin C. Invasive Saccharomyces infection: a comprehensive review. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(11):1559–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
