Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2001 Jul;81(1):66–78. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75680-9

Microtubule treadmilling in vitro investigated by fluorescence speckle and confocal microscopy.

S Grego 1, V Cantillana 1, E D Salmon 1
PMCID: PMC1301492  PMID: 11423395

Abstract

Whether polarized treadmilling is an intrinsic property of microtubules assembled from pure tubulin has been controversial. We have tested this possibility by imaging the polymerization dynamics of individual microtubules in samples assembled to steady-state in vitro from porcine brain tubulin, using a 2% glycerol buffer to reduce dynamic instability. Fluorescence speckled microtubules were bound to the cover-glass surface by kinesin motors, and the assembly dynamics of plus and minus ends were recorded with a spinning-disk confocal fluorescence microscopy system. At steady-state assembly, 19% of the observed microtubules (n = 89) achieved treadmilling in a plus-to-minus direction, 34% in a minus-to-plus direction, 37% grew at both ends, and 10% just shortened. For the population of measured microtubules, the distribution of lengths remained unchanged while a 20% loss of original and 27% gain of new polymer occurred over the 20-min period of observation. The lack of polarity in the observed treadmilling indicates that stochastic differences in dynamic instability between plus and minus ends are responsible for polymer turnover at steady-state assembly, not unidirectional treadmilling. A Monte Carlo simulation of plus and minus end dynamics using measured dynamic instability parameters reproduces our experimental results and the amount of steady-state polymer turnover reported by previous biochemical assays.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (498.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bergen L. G., Borisy G. G. Head-to-tail polymerization of microtubules in vitro. Electron microscope analysis of seeded assembly. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jan;84(1):141–150. doi: 10.1083/jcb.84.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Desai A., Maddox P. S., Mitchison T. J., Salmon E. D. Anaphase A chromosome movement and poleward spindle microtubule flux occur At similar rates in Xenopus extract spindles. J Cell Biol. 1998 May 4;141(3):703–713. doi: 10.1083/jcb.141.3.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Desai A., Mitchison T. J. Microtubule polymerization dynamics. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1997;13:83–117. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Duke T, Holy TE, Leibler S. "Gliding assays" for motor proteins: A theoretical analysis. Phys Rev Lett. 1995 Jan 9;74(2):330–333. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Endow S. A., Kang S. J., Satterwhite L. L., Rose M. D., Skeen V. P., Salmon E. D. Yeast Kar3 is a minus-end microtubule motor protein that destabilizes microtubules preferentially at the minus ends. EMBO J. 1994 Jun 1;13(11):2708–2713. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06561.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fygenson DK, Braun E, Libchaber A. Phase diagram of microtubules. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics. 1994 Aug;50(2):1579–1588. doi: 10.1103/physreve.50.1579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gildersleeve R. F., Cross A. R., Cullen K. E., Fagen A. P., Williams R. C., Jr Microtubules grow and shorten at intrinsically variable rates. J Biol Chem. 1992 Apr 25;267(12):7995–8006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hotani H., Horio T. Dynamics of microtubules visualized by darkfield microscopy: treadmilling and dynamic instability. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1988;10(1-2):229–236. doi: 10.1002/cm.970100127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Howard J., Hunt A. J., Baek S. Assay of microtubule movement driven by single kinesin molecules. Methods Cell Biol. 1993;39:137–147. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60167-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Howell B., Larsson N., Gullberg M., Cassimeris L. Dissociation of the tubulin-sequestering and microtubule catastrophe-promoting activities of oncoprotein 18/stathmin. Mol Biol Cell. 1999 Jan;10(1):105–118. doi: 10.1091/mbc.10.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Inoué S., Salmon E. D. Force generation by microtubule assembly/disassembly in mitosis and related movements. Mol Biol Cell. 1995 Dec;6(12):1619–1640. doi: 10.1091/mbc.6.12.1619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kristofferson D., Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Direct observation of steady-state microtubule dynamics. J Cell Biol. 1986 Mar;102(3):1007–1019. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.3.1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Margolis R. L. Role of GTP hydrolysis in microtubule treadmilling and assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Mar;78(3):1586–1590. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.3.1586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Margolis R. L., Wilson L. Microtubule treadmilling: what goes around comes around. Bioessays. 1998 Oct;20(10):830–836. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199810)20:10<830::AID-BIES8>3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Margolis R. L., Wilson L. Opposite end assembly and disassembly of microtubules at steady state in vitro. Cell. 1978 Jan;13(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90132-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mitchison T. J. Polewards microtubule flux in the mitotic spindle: evidence from photoactivation of fluorescence. J Cell Biol. 1989 Aug;109(2):637–652. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.2.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mitchison T. J., Salmon E. D. Poleward kinetochore fiber movement occurs during both metaphase and anaphase-A in newt lung cell mitosis. J Cell Biol. 1992 Nov;119(3):569–582. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.3.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature. 1984 Nov 15;312(5991):237–242. doi: 10.1038/312237a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Panda D., Miller H. P., Wilson L. Rapid treadmilling of brain microtubules free of microtubule-associated proteins in vitro and its suppression by tau. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Oct 26;96(22):12459–12464. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Phelps K. K., Walker R. A. NEM tubulin inhibits microtubule minus end assembly by a reversible capping mechanism. Biochemistry. 2000 Apr 11;39(14):3877–3885. doi: 10.1021/bi992200x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rodionov V. I., Borisy G. G. Microtubule treadmilling in vivo. Science. 1997 Jan 10;275(5297):215–218. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5297.215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rodionov V., Nadezhdina E., Borisy G. Centrosomal control of microtubule dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jan 5;96(1):115–120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.1.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Toso R. J., Jordan M. A., Farrell K. W., Matsumoto B., Wilson L. Kinetic stabilization of microtubule dynamic instability in vitro by vinblastine. Biochemistry. 1993 Feb 9;32(5):1285–1293. doi: 10.1021/bi00056a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tran P. T., Joshi P., Salmon E. D. How tubulin subunits are lost from the shortening ends of microtubules. J Struct Biol. 1997 Mar;118(2):107–118. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1997.3844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tran P. T., Walker R. A., Salmon E. D. A metastable intermediate state of microtubule dynamic instability that differs significantly between plus and minus ends. J Cell Biol. 1997 Jul 14;138(1):105–117. doi: 10.1083/jcb.138.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Vasquez R. J., Howell B., Yvon A. M., Wadsworth P., Cassimeris L. Nanomolar concentrations of nocodazole alter microtubule dynamic instability in vivo and in vitro. Mol Biol Cell. 1997 Jun;8(6):973–985. doi: 10.1091/mbc.8.6.973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Walker R. A., Inoué S., Salmon E. D. Asymmetric behavior of severed microtubule ends after ultraviolet-microbeam irradiation of individual microtubules in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1989 Mar;108(3):931–937. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.3.931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Walker R. A., O'Brien E. T., Pryer N. K., Soboeiro M. F., Voter W. A., Erickson H. P., Salmon E. D. Dynamic instability of individual microtubules analyzed by video light microscopy: rate constants and transition frequencies. J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1437–1448. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Walker R. A., Pryer N. K., Salmon E. D. Dilution of individual microtubules observed in real time in vitro: evidence that cap size is small and independent of elongation rate. J Cell Biol. 1991 Jul;114(1):73–81. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.1.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Waterman-Storer C. M., Salmon E. D. Actomyosin-based retrograde flow of microtubules in the lamella of migrating epithelial cells influences microtubule dynamic instability and turnover and is associated with microtubule breakage and treadmilling. J Cell Biol. 1997 Oct 20;139(2):417–434. doi: 10.1083/jcb.139.2.417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Waterman-Storer C. M., Salmon E. D. How microtubules get fluorescent speckles. Biophys J. 1998 Oct;75(4):2059–2069. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77648-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Waterman-Storer C. M., Salmon E. D. Microtubule dynamics: treadmilling comes around again. Curr Biol. 1997 Jun 1;7(6):R369–R372. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00177-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Waters J. C., Skibbens R. V., Salmon E. D. Oscillating mitotic newt lung cell kinetochores are, on average, under tension and rarely push. J Cell Sci. 1996 Dec;109(Pt 12):2823–2831. doi: 10.1242/jcs.109.12.2823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wegner A. Head to tail polymerization of actin. J Mol Biol. 1976 Nov;108(1):139–150. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(76)80100-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhai Y., Kronebusch P. J., Borisy G. G. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and the metaphase-anaphase transition. J Cell Biol. 1995 Nov;131(3):721–734. doi: 10.1083/jcb.131.3.721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES