Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2001 Oct;81(4):1854–1867. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75837-7

Spatial range of autocrine signaling: modeling and computational analysis.

S Y Shvartsman 1, H S Wiley 1, W M Deen 1, D A Lauffenburger 1
PMCID: PMC1301661  PMID: 11566760

Abstract

Autocrine loops formed by growth factors and their receptors have been identified in a large number of developmental, physiological, and pathological contexts. In general, the spatially distributed and recursive nature of autocrine signaling systems makes their experimental analysis, and often even their detection, very difficult. Here, we combine Brownian motion theory, Monte Carlo simulations, and reaction-diffusion models to analyze the spatial operation of autocrine loops. Within this modeling framework, the ability of autocrine cells to recapture the endogenous ligand and the distances traveled by autocrine ligands are explicitly related to ligand diffusion coefficients, density of surface receptors, ligand secretion rate, and rate constants of ligand binding and endocytic internalization. Applying our models to study autocrine loops in the epidermal growth factor receptor system, we find that autocrine loops can be highly localized--even at the level of a single cell. We demonstrate how the variations in molecular and cellular parameters may "tune" the spatial range of autocrine signals over several orders of magnitude: from microns to millimeters. We argue that this versatile regulation of the spatial range of autocrine signaling enables autocrine cells to perceive a broad spectrum of environmental information.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (209.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agmon N., Edelstein A. L. Collective binding properties of receptor arrays. Biophys J. 1997 Apr;72(4):1582–1594. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78805-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arribas J., Coodly L., Vollmer P., Kishimoto T. K., Rose-John S., Massagué J. Diverse cell surface protein ectodomains are shed by a system sensitive to metalloprotease inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 1996 May 10;271(19):11376–11382. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.19.11376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg H. C., Purcell E. M. Physics of chemoreception. Biophys J. 1977 Nov;20(2):193–219. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(77)85544-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carpenter G. Employment of the epidermal growth factor receptor in growth factor-independent signaling pathways. J Cell Biol. 1999 Aug 23;146(4):697–702. doi: 10.1083/jcb.146.4.697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Casci T., Freeman M. Control of EGF receptor signalling: lessons from fruitflies. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1999;18(2):181–201. doi: 10.1023/a:1006313122373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davies D. E., Polosa R., Puddicombe S. M., Richter A., Holgate S. T. The epidermal growth factor receptor and its ligand family: their potential role in repair and remodelling in asthma. Allergy. 1999 Aug;54(8):771–783. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DeWitt A. E., Dong J. Y., Wiley H. S., Lauffenburger D. A. Quantitative analysis of the EGF receptor autocrine system reveals cryptic regulation of cell response by ligand capture. J Cell Sci. 2001 Jun;114(Pt 12):2301–2313. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.12.2301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dent P., Reardon D. B., Park J. S., Bowers G., Logsdon C., Valerie K., Schmidt-Ullrich R. Radiation-induced release of transforming growth factor alpha activates the epidermal growth factor receptor and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in carcinoma cells, leading to increased proliferation and protection from radiation-induced cell death. Mol Biol Cell. 1999 Aug;10(8):2493–2506. doi: 10.1091/mbc.10.8.2493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dethlefsen S. M., Raab G., Moses M. A., Adam R. M., Klagsbrun M., Freeman M. R. Extracellular calcium influx stimulates metalloproteinase cleavage and secretion of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor independently of protein kinase C. J Cell Biochem. 1998 May 1;69(2):143–153. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4644(19980501)69:2<143::aid-jcb5>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Doedens J. R., Black R. A. Stimulation-induced down-regulation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha converting enzyme. J Biol Chem. 2000 May 12;275(19):14598–14607. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.19.14598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dong J., Opresko L. K., Dempsey P. J., Lauffenburger D. A., Coffey R. J., Wiley H. S. Metalloprotease-mediated ligand release regulates autocrine signaling through the epidermal growth factor receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 May 25;96(11):6235–6240. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dowd C. J., Cooney C. L., Nugent M. A. Heparan sulfate mediates bFGF transport through basement membrane by diffusion with rapid reversible binding. J Biol Chem. 1999 Feb 19;274(8):5236–5244. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.8.5236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Díaz-Rodríguez E., Esparís-Ogando A., Montero J. C., Yuste L., Pandiella A. Stimulation of cleavage of membrane proteins by calmodulin inhibitors. Biochem J. 2000 Mar 1;346(Pt 2):359–367. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Entchev E. V., Schwabedissen A., González-Gaitán M. Gradient formation of the TGF-beta homolog Dpp. Cell. 2000 Dec 8;103(6):981–991. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00200-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fan H., Derynck R. Ectodomain shedding of TGF-alpha and other transmembrane proteins is induced by receptor tyrosine kinase activation and MAP kinase signaling cascades. EMBO J. 1999 Dec 15;18(24):6962–6972. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.24.6962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Forsten K. E., Lauffenburger D. A. Probability of autocrine ligand capture by cell-surface receptors: implications for ligand secretion measurements. J Comput Biol. 1994 Spring;1(1):15–23. doi: 10.1089/cmb.1994.1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Forsten K. E., Lauffenburger D. A. The role of low-affinity interleukin-2 receptors in autocrine ligand binding: alternative mechanisms for enhanced binding effect. Mol Immunol. 1994 Jul;31(10):739–751. doi: 10.1016/0161-5890(94)90148-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Freeman M. Feedback control of intercellular signalling in development. Nature. 2000 Nov 16;408(6810):313–319. doi: 10.1038/35042500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gechtman Z., Alonso J. L., Raab G., Ingber D. E., Klagsbrun M. The shedding of membrane-anchored heparin-binding epidermal-like growth factor is regulated by the Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade and by cell adhesion and spreading. J Biol Chem. 1999 Oct 1;274(40):28828–28835. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.40.28828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Goldring S. R., Goldring M. B. Cytokines and skeletal physiology. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Mar;(324):13–23. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199603000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Goldstein B., Dembo M. Approximating the effects of diffusion on reversible reactions at the cell surface: ligand-receptor kinetics. Biophys J. 1995 Apr;68(4):1222–1230. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80298-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hackel P. O., Zwick E., Prenzel N., Ullrich A. Epidermal growth factor receptors: critical mediators of multiple receptor pathways. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999 Apr;11(2):184–189. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(99)80024-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Haller M. F., Saltzman W. M. Localized delivery of proteins in the brain: can transport be customized? Pharm Res. 1998 Mar;15(3):377–385. doi: 10.1023/a:1011911912174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Johnson E. M., Berk D. A., Jain R. K., Deen W. M. Hindered diffusion in agarose gels: test of effective medium model. Biophys J. 1996 Feb;70(2):1017–1023. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79645-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kalmes A., Vesti B. R., Daum G., Abraham J. A., Clowes A. W. Heparin blockade of thrombin-induced smooth muscle cell migration involves inhibition of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor transactivation by heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor. Circ Res. 2000 Jul 21;87(2):92–98. doi: 10.1161/01.res.87.2.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim H. G., Kassis J., Souto J. C., Turner T., Wells A. EGF receptor signaling in prostate morphogenesis and tumorigenesis. Histol Histopathol. 1999 Oct;14(4):1175–1182. doi: 10.14670/HH-14.1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kuwada S. K., Lund K. A., Li X. F., Cliften P., Amsler K., Opresko L. K., Wiley H. S. Differential signaling and regulation of apical vs. basolateral EGFR in polarized epithelial cells. Am J Physiol. 1998 Dec;275(6 Pt 1):C1419–C1428. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1998.275.6.C1419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lagerholm B. C., Thompson N. L. Theory for ligand rebinding at cell membrane surfaces. Biophys J. 1998 Mar;74(3):1215–1228. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77836-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lauffenburger D. A., Forsten K. E., Will B., Wiley H. S. Molecular/cell engineering approach to autocrine ligand control of cell function. Ann Biomed Eng. 1995 May-Jun;23(3):208–215. doi: 10.1007/BF02584423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lauffenburger D. A., Oehrtman G. T., Walker L., Wiley H. S. Real-time quantitative measurement of autocrine ligand binding indicates that autocrine loops are spatially localized. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Dec 22;95(26):15368–15373. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Massagué J., Pandiella A. Membrane-anchored growth factors. Annu Rev Biochem. 1993;62:515–541. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.62.070193.002503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Moghal N., Sternberg P. W. Multiple positive and negative regulators of signaling by the EGF-receptor. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999 Apr;11(2):190–196. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(99)80025-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. O-Charoenrat P., Rhys-Evans P., Eccles S. Expression and regulation of c-ERBB ligands in human head and neck squamous carcinoma cells. Int J Cancer. 2000 Dec 1;88(5):759–765. doi: 10.1002/1097-0215(20001201)88:5<759::aid-ijc12>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Oehrtman G. T., Wiley H. S., Lauffenburger D. A. Escape of autocrine ligands into extracellular medium: experimental test of theoretical model predictions. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1998 Mar 5;57(5):571–582. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Saxton M. J. Anomalous diffusion due to binding: a Monte Carlo study. Biophys J. 1996 Mar;70(3):1250–1262. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79682-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Saxton M. J. Anomalous diffusion due to obstacles: a Monte Carlo study. Biophys J. 1994 Feb;66(2 Pt 1):394–401. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(94)80789-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Saxton M. J., Jacobson K. Single-particle tracking: applications to membrane dynamics. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1997;26:373–399. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.26.1.373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Saxton M. J. Single-particle tracking: effects of corrals. Biophys J. 1995 Aug;69(2):389–398. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)79911-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Saxton M. J. Single-particle tracking: the distribution of diffusion coefficients. Biophys J. 1997 Apr;72(4):1744–1753. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78820-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schlessinger J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell. 2000 Oct 13;103(2):211–225. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00114-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Shi W., Fan H., Shum L., Derynck R. The tetraspanin CD9 associates with transmembrane TGF-alpha and regulates TGF-alpha-induced EGF receptor activation and cell proliferation. J Cell Biol. 2000 Feb 7;148(3):591–602. doi: 10.1083/jcb.148.3.591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Shoup D., Szabo A. Role of diffusion in ligand binding to macromolecules and cell-bound receptors. Biophys J. 1982 Oct;40(1):33–39. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84455-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sporn M. B., Roberts A. B. Autocrine secretion--10 years later. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Sep 1;117(5):408–414. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-5-408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sporn M. B., Todaro G. J. Autocrine secretion and malignant transformation of cells. N Engl J Med. 1980 Oct 9;303(15):878–880. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198010093031511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Stevens L. Twin peaks: Spitz and Argos star in patterning of the Drosophila egg. Cell. 1998 Oct 30;95(3):291–294. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81759-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Strigini M., Cohen S. M. Wingless gradient formation in the Drosophila wing. Curr Biol. 2000 Mar 23;10(6):293–300. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00378-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tang P., Steck P. A., Yung W. K. The autocrine loop of TGF-alpha/EGFR and brain tumors. J Neurooncol. 1997 Dec;35(3):303–314. doi: 10.1023/a:1005824802617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tokumaru S., Higashiyama S., Endo T., Nakagawa T., Miyagawa J. I., Yamamori K., Hanakawa Y., Ohmoto H., Yoshino K., Shirakata Y. Ectodomain shedding of epidermal growth factor receptor ligands is required for keratinocyte migration in cutaneous wound healing. J Cell Biol. 2000 Oct 16;151(2):209–220. doi: 10.1083/jcb.151.2.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang D., Gou S. Y., Axelrod D. Reaction rate enhancement by surface diffusion of adsorbates. Biophys Chem. 1992 Jun;43(2):117–137. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(92)80027-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wells A. EGF receptor. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1999 Jun;31(6):637–643. doi: 10.1016/s1357-2725(99)00015-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wells A. Tumor invasion: role of growth factor-induced cell motility. Adv Cancer Res. 2000;78:31–101. doi: 10.1016/s0065-230x(08)61023-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Werb Z., Yan Y. A cellular striptease act. Science. 1998 Nov 13;282(5392):1279–1280. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5392.1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wiley H. S., Woolf M. F., Opresko L. K., Burke P. M., Will B., Morgan J. R., Lauffenburger D. A. Removal of the membrane-anchoring domain of epidermal growth factor leads to intracrine signaling and disruption of mammary epithelial cell organization. J Cell Biol. 1998 Nov 30;143(5):1317–1328. doi: 10.1083/jcb.143.5.1317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zwanzig R., Szabo A. Time dependent rate of diffusion-influenced ligand binding to receptors on cell surfaces. Biophys J. 1991 Sep;60(3):671–678. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82096-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zwick E., Hackel P. O., Prenzel N., Ullrich A. The EGF receptor as central transducer of heterologous signalling systems. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1999 Oct;20(10):408–412. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(99)01373-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES