Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2001 Oct;81(4):2059–2068. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75855-9

The voltage-dependent proton pumping in bacteriorhodopsin is characterized by optoelectric behavior.

S Geibel 1, T Friedrich 1, P Ormos 1, P G Wood 1, G Nagel 1, E Bamberg 1
PMCID: PMC1301679  PMID: 11566778

Abstract

The light-driven proton pump bacteriorhodopsin (bR) was functionally expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and in HEK-293 cells. The latter expression system allowed high time resolution of light-induced current signals. A detailed voltage clamp and patch clamp study was performed to investigate the DeltapH versus Deltapsi dependence of the pump current. The following results were obtained. The current voltage behavior of bR is linear in the measurable range between -160 mV and +60 mV. The pH dependence is less than expected from thermodynamic principles, i.e., one DeltapH unit produces a shift of the apparent reversal potential of 34 mV (and not 58 mV). The M(2)-BR decay shows a significant voltage dependence with time constants changing from 20 ms at +60 mV to 80 ms at -160 mV. The linear I-V curve can be reconstructed by this behavior. However, the slope of the decay rate shows a weaker voltage dependence than the stationary photocurrent, indicating that an additional process must be involved in the voltage dependence of the pump. A slowly decaying M intermediate (decay time > 100 ms) could already be detected at zero voltage by electrical and spectroscopic means. In effect, bR shows optoelectric behavior. The long-lived M can be transferred into the active photocycle by depolarizing voltage pulses. This is experimentally demonstrated by a distinct charge displacement. From the results we conclude that the transport cycle of bR branches via a long-lived M(1)* in a voltage-dependent manner into a nontransporting cycle, where the proton release and uptake occur on the extracellular side.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (149.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bamberg E., Fahr A. Photocurrents induced on black lipid membranes by purple membranes: a method of reconstitution and a kinetic study of the photocurrents. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1980;358:324–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb15405.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Braun D., Dencher N. A., Fahr A., Lindau M., Heyn M. P. Nonlinear voltage dependence of the light-driven proton pump current of bacteriorhodopsin. Biophys J. 1988 Apr;53(4):617–621. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83140-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen C., Okayama H. High-efficiency transformation of mammalian cells by plasmid DNA. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Aug;7(8):2745–2752. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.8.2745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Druckmann S., Ottolenghi M., Pande A., Pande J., Callender R. H. Acid-base equilibrium of the Schiff base in bacteriorhodopsin. Biochemistry. 1982 Sep 28;21(20):4953–4959. doi: 10.1021/bi00263a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Essen L., Siegert R., Lehmann W. D., Oesterhelt D. Lipid patches in membrane protein oligomers: crystal structure of the bacteriorhodopsin-lipid complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Sep 29;95(20):11673–11678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.20.11673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Groma G. I., Helgerson S. L., Wolber P. K., Beece D., Dancsházy Z., Keszthelyi L., Stoeckenius W. Coupling between the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle and the protonmotive force in Halobacterium halobium cell envelope vesicles. II. Quantitation and preliminary modeling of the M----bR reactions. Biophys J. 1984 May;45(5):985–992. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84243-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grygorczyk R., Hanke-Baier P., Schwarz W., Passow H. Measurement of erythroid band 3 protein-mediated anion transport in mRNA-injected oocytes of Xenopus laevis. Methods Enzymol. 1989;173:453–466. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(89)73032-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hamill O. P., Marty A., Neher E., Sakmann B., Sigworth F. J. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch. 1981 Aug;391(2):85–100. doi: 10.1007/BF00656997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Henderson R., Baldwin J. M., Ceska T. A., Zemlin F., Beckmann E., Downing K. H. Model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high-resolution electron cryo-microscopy. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jun 20;213(4):899–929. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80271-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaim G., Dimroth P. ATP synthesis by F-type ATP synthase is obligatorily dependent on the transmembrane voltage. EMBO J. 1999 Aug 2;18(15):4118–4127. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.15.4118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Landau E. M., Rosenbusch J. P. Lipidic cubic phases: a novel concept for the crystallization of membrane proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Dec 10;93(25):14532–14535. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Luecke H., Schobert B., Richter H. T., Cartailler J. P., Lanyi J. K. Structure of bacteriorhodopsin at 1.55 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1999 Aug 27;291(4):899–911. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Michel H., Oesterhelt D. Light-induced changes of the pH gradient and the membrane potential in H. halobium. FEBS Lett. 1976 Jun 1;65(2):175–178. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(76)80473-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nagel G., Kelety B., Möckel B., Büldt G., Bamberg E. Voltage dependence of proton pumping by bacteriorhodopsin is regulated by the voltage-sensitive ratio of M1 to M2. Biophys J. 1998 Jan;74(1):403–412. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77797-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nagel G., Möckel B., Büldt G., Bamberg E. Functional expression of bacteriorhodopsin in oocytes allows direct measurement of voltage dependence of light induced H+ pumping. FEBS Lett. 1995 Dec 18;377(2):263–266. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)01356-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Oesterhelt D., Hess B. Reversible photolysis of the purple complex in the purple membrane of Halobacterium halobium. Eur J Biochem. 1973 Aug 17;37(2):316–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1973.tb02990.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ormos P., Dancsházy Z., Karvaly B. Mechanism of generation and regulation of photopotential by bacteriorhodopsin in bimolecular lipid membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978 Aug 8;503(2):304–315. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(78)90190-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Quintanilha A. T. Control of the photocycle in bacteriorhodopsin by electrochemical gradients. FEBS Lett. 1980 Aug 11;117(1):8–12. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)80901-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sheves M., Albeck A., Friedman N., Ottolenghi M. Controlling the pKa of the bacteriorhodopsin Schiff base by use of artificial retinal analogues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 May;83(10):3262–3266. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.10.3262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shull G. E. cDNA cloning of the beta-subunit of the rat gastric H,K-ATPase. J Biol Chem. 1990 Jul 25;265(21):12123–12126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES