Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2001 Nov;81(5):2458–2472. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75892-4

Insertion and pore formation driven by adsorption of proteins onto lipid bilayer membrane-water interfaces.

M J Zuckermann 1, T Heimburg 1
PMCID: PMC1301716  PMID: 11606262

Abstract

We describe the binding of proteins to lipid bilayers in the case for which binding can occur either by adsorption to the lipid bilayer membrane-water interface or by direct insertion into the bilayer itself. We examine in particular the case when the insertion and pore formation are driven by the adsorption process using scaled particle theory. The adsorbed proteins form a two-dimensional "surface gas" at the lipid bilayer membrane-water interface that exerts a lateral pressure on the lipid bilayer membrane. Under conditions of strong intrinsic binding and a high degree of interfacial converge, this pressure can become high enough to overcome the energy barrier for protein insertion. Under these conditions, a subtle equilibrium exists between the adsorbed and inserted proteins. We propose that this provides a control mechanism for reversible insertion and pore formation of proteins such as melittin and magainin. Next, we discuss experimental data for the binding isotherms of cytochrome c to charged lipid membranes in the light of our theory and predict that cytochrome c inserts into charged lipid bilayers at low ionic strength. This prediction is supported by titration calorimetry results that are reported here. We were furthermore able to describe the observed binding isotherms of the pore-forming peptides endotoxin (alpha 5-helix) and of pardaxin to zwitterionic vesicles from our theory by assuming adsorption/insertion equilibrium.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (938.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bechinger B., Gierasch L. M., Montal M., Zasloff M., Opella S. J. Orientations of helical peptides in membrane bilayers by solid state NMR spectroscopy. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson. 1996 Dec;7(3):185–191. doi: 10.1016/0926-2040(95)01224-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bechinger B. The structure, dynamics and orientation of antimicrobial peptides in membranes by multidimensional solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999 Dec 15;1462(1-2):157–183. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(99)00205-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chatelier R. C., Minton A. P. Adsorption of globular proteins on locally planar surfaces: models for the effect of excluded surface area and aggregation of adsorbed protein on adsorption equilibria. Biophys J. 1996 Nov;71(5):2367–2374. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79430-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dan N., Safran S. A. Effect of lipid characteristics on the structure of transmembrane proteins. Biophys J. 1998 Sep;75(3):1410–1414. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)74059-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ducarme P., Rahman M., Brasseur R. IMPALA: a simple restraint field to simulate the biological membrane in molecular structure studies. Proteins. 1998 Mar 1;30(4):357–371. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gazit E., La Rocca P., Sansom M. S., Shai Y. The structure and organization within the membrane of the helices composing the pore-forming domain of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin are consistent with an "umbrella-like" structure of the pore. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Oct 13;95(21):12289–12294. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Heimburg T., Angerstein B., Marsh D. Binding of peripheral proteins to mixed lipid membranes: effect of lipid demixing upon binding. Biophys J. 1999 May;76(5):2575–2586. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77410-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heimburg T., Biltonen R. L. Thermotropic behavior of dimyristoylphosphatidylglycerol and its interaction with cytochrome c. Biochemistry. 1994 Aug 16;33(32):9477–9488. doi: 10.1021/bi00198a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heimburg T., Marsh D. Protein surface-distribution and protein-protein interactions in the binding of peripheral proteins to charged lipid membranes. Biophys J. 1995 Feb;68(2):536–546. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80215-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kessel A., Cafiso D. S., Ben-Tal N. Continuum solvent model calculations of alamethicin-membrane interactions: thermodynamic aspects. Biophys J. 2000 Feb;78(2):571–583. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76617-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ladokhin A. S., Selsted M. E., White S. H. Sizing membrane pores in lipid vesicles by leakage of co-encapsulated markers: pore formation by melittin. Biophys J. 1997 Apr;72(4):1762–1766. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78822-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Minton A. P. Adsorption of globular proteins on locally planar surfaces. II. Models for the effect of multiple adsorbate conformations on adsorption equilibria and kinetics. Biophys J. 1999 Jan;76(1 Pt 1):176–187. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77187-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ohki S., Marcus E., Sukumaran D. K., Arnold K. Interaction of melittin with lipid membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994 Sep 14;1194(2):223–232. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(94)90303-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ojcius D. M., Young J. D. Cytolytic pore-forming proteins and peptides: is there a common structural motif? Trends Biochem Sci. 1991 Jun;16(6):225–229. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(91)90090-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pramanik A., Thyberg P., Rigler R. Molecular interactions of peptides with phospholipid vesicle membranes as studied by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Chem Phys Lipids. 2000 Jan;104(1):35–47. doi: 10.1016/s0009-3084(99)00113-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rapaport D., Shai Y. Interaction of fluorescently labeled pardaxin and its analogues with lipid bilayers. J Biol Chem. 1991 Dec 15;266(35):23769–23775. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shai Y. Mechanism of the binding, insertion and destabilization of phospholipid bilayer membranes by alpha-helical antimicrobial and cell non-selective membrane-lytic peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999 Dec 15;1462(1-2):55–70. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(99)00200-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shillcock J. C., Boal D. H. Entropy-driven instability and rupture of fluid membranes. Biophys J. 1996 Jul;71(1):317–326. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79227-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Vaz Gomes A., de Waal A., Berden J. A., Westerhoff H. V. Electric potentiation, cooperativity, and synergism of magainin peptides in protein-free liposomes. Biochemistry. 1993 May 25;32(20):5365–5372. doi: 10.1021/bi00071a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yang L., Weiss T. M., Lehrer R. I., Huang H. W. Crystallization of antimicrobial pores in membranes: magainin and protegrin. Biophys J. 2000 Oct;79(4):2002–2009. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76448-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES