Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2001 Dec;81(6):3116–3136. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75949-8

Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations.

T B Kepler 1, T C Elston 1
PMCID: PMC1301773  PMID: 11720979

Abstract

Transcriptional regulation is an inherently noisy process. The origins of this stochastic behavior can be traced to the random transitions among the discrete chemical states of operators that control the transcription rate and to finite number fluctuations in the biochemical reactions for the synthesis and degradation of transcripts. We develop stochastic models to which these random reactions are intrinsic and a series of simpler models derived explicitly from the first as approximations in different parameter regimes. This innate stochasticity can have both a quantitative and qualitative impact on the behavior of gene-regulatory networks. We introduce a natural generalization of deterministic bifurcations for classification of stochastic systems and show that simple noisy genetic switches have rich bifurcation structures; among them, bifurcations driven solely by changing the rate of operator fluctuations even as the underlying deterministic system remains unchanged. We find stochastic bistability where the deterministic equations predict monostability and vice-versa. We derive and solve equations for the mean waiting times for spontaneous transitions between quasistable states in these switches.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (399.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahmad K., Henikoff S. Modulation of a transcription factor counteracts heterochromatic gene silencing in Drosophila. Cell. 2001 Mar 23;104(6):839–847. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00281-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arkin A., Ross J., McAdams H. H. Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells. Genetics. 1998 Aug;149(4):1633–1648. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.4.1633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Becskei A., Séraphin B., Serrano L. Positive feedback in eukaryotic gene networks: cell differentiation by graded to binary response conversion. EMBO J. 2001 May 15;20(10):2528–2535. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.10.2528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett D. C. Differentiation in mouse melanoma cells: initial reversibility and an on-off stochastic model. Cell. 1983 Sep;34(2):445–453. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90378-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cherry J. L., Adler F. R. How to make a biological switch. J Theor Biol. 2000 Mar 21;203(2):117–133. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cook D. L., Gerber A. N., Tapscott S. J. Modeling stochastic gene expression: implications for haploinsufficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Dec 22;95(26):15641–15646. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dingemanse M. A., de Boer P. A., Moorman A. F., Charles R., Lamers W. H. The expression of liver-specific genes within rat embryonic hepatocytes is a discontinuous process. Differentiation. 1994 May;56(3):153–162. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-0436.1994.5630153.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Elowitz M. B., Leibler S. A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature. 2000 Jan 20;403(6767):335–338. doi: 10.1038/35002125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Endy D., Brent R. Modelling cellular behaviour. Nature. 2001 Jan 18;409(6818):391–395. doi: 10.1038/35053181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fiering S., Northrop J. P., Nolan G. P., Mattila P. S., Crabtree G. R., Herzenberg L. A. Single cell assay of a transcription factor reveals a threshold in transcription activated by signals emanating from the T-cell antigen receptor. Genes Dev. 1990 Oct;4(10):1823–1834. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.10.1823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gardner T. S., Cantor C. R., Collins J. J. Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli. Nature. 2000 Jan 20;403(6767):339–342. doi: 10.1038/35002131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Grunstein M. Histone acetylation in chromatin structure and transcription. Nature. 1997 Sep 25;389(6649):349–352. doi: 10.1038/38664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hasty J., McMillen D., Isaacs F., Collins J. J. Computational studies of gene regulatory networks: in numero molecular biology. Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Apr;2(4):268–279. doi: 10.1038/35066056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hasty J., Pradines J., Dolnik M., Collins J. J. Noise-based switches and amplifiers for gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Feb 29;97(5):2075–2080. doi: 10.1073/pnas.040411297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hasty Jeff, Isaacs Farren, Dolnik Milos, McMillen David, Collins J. J. Designer gene networks: Towards fundamental cellular control. Chaos. 2001 Mar;11(1):207–220. doi: 10.1063/1.1345702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ko M. S. A stochastic model for gene induction. J Theor Biol. 1991 Nov 21;153(2):181–194. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80421-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ko M. S. Induction mechanism of a single gene molecule: stochastic or deterministic? Bioessays. 1992 May;14(5):341–346. doi: 10.1002/bies.950140510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ko M. S., Nakauchi H., Takahashi N. The dose dependence of glucocorticoid-inducible gene expression results from changes in the number of transcriptionally active templates. EMBO J. 1990 Sep;9(9):2835–2842. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07472.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McAdams H. H., Arkin A. Simulation of prokaryotic genetic circuits. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1998;27:199–224. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.27.1.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McAdams H. H., Arkin A. Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Feb 4;94(3):814–819. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.3.814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Santillan M., Mackey M. C. Dynamic regulation of the tryptophan operon: a modeling study and comparison with experimental data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Feb 13;98(4):1364–1369. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.4.1364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Santillan Moises, Mackey Michael C. Dynamic behavior in mathematical models of the tryptophan operon. Chaos. 2001 Mar;11(1):261–268. doi: 10.1063/1.1336806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shea M. A., Ackers G. K. The OR control system of bacteriophage lambda. A physical-chemical model for gene regulation. J Mol Biol. 1985 Jan 20;181(2):211–230. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90086-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Thattai M., van Oudenaarden A. Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 3;98(15):8614–8619. doi: 10.1073/pnas.151588598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Walters M. C., Fiering S., Eidemiller J., Magis W., Groudine M., Martin D. I. Enhancers increase the probability but not the level of gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jul 18;92(15):7125–7129. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.15.7125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Weintraub H. Formation of stable transcription complexes as assayed by analysis of individual templates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(16):5819–5823. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.16.5819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wijgerde M., Grosveld F., Fraser P. Transcription complex stability and chromatin dynamics in vivo. Nature. 1995 Sep 21;377(6546):209–213. doi: 10.1038/377209a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. van Roon M. A., Aten J. A., van Oven C. H., Charles R., Lamers W. H. The initiation of hepatocyte-specific gene expression within embryonic hepatocytes is a stochastic event. Dev Biol. 1989 Dec;136(2):508–516. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(89)90276-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES