Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2002 Feb;82(2):693–712. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75432-5

Membrane fusion: stalk model revisited.

Vladislav S Markin 1, Joseph P Albanesi 1
PMCID: PMC1301879  PMID: 11806912

Abstract

Membrane fusion is believed to proceed via intermediate structures called stalks. Mathematical analysis of the stalk provided the elastic energy involved in this structure and predicted the possible evolution of the overall process, but the energies predicted by the original model were suspiciously high. This was due to an erroneous assumption, i.e., that the stalk has a figure of revolution of a circular arc. Here we abandon this assumption and calculate the correct shape of the stalk. We find that it can be made completely stress free and, hence, its energy, instead of being positive and high can become negative, thus facilitating the fusion process. Based on our new calculations, the energies of hemifusion, of complete fusion, and of the pore in a bilayer were analyzed. Implications for membrane fusion and lipid phase transitions are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (526.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Achiriloaie M., Barylko B., Albanesi J. P. Essential role of the dynamin pleckstrin homology domain in receptor-mediated endocytosis. Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Feb;19(2):1410–1415. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.2.1410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barylko B., Binns D., Lin K. M., Atkinson M. A., Jameson D. M., Yin H. L., Albanesi J. P. Synergistic activation of dynamin GTPase by Grb2 and phosphoinositides. J Biol Chem. 1998 Feb 6;273(6):3791–3797. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.6.3791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Basáez G., Goñi F. M., Alonso A. Effect of single chain lipids on phospholipase C-promoted vesicle fusion. A test for the stalk hypothesis of membrane fusion. Biochemistry. 1998 Mar 17;37(11):3901–3908. doi: 10.1021/bi9728497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burger K. N. Greasing membrane fusion and fission machineries. Traffic. 2000 Aug;1(8):605–613. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2000.010804.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chernomordik L. V., Leikina E., Frolov V., Bronk P., Zimmerberg J. An early stage of membrane fusion mediated by the low pH conformation of influenza hemagglutinin depends upon membrane lipids. J Cell Biol. 1997 Jan 13;136(1):81–93. doi: 10.1083/jcb.136.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chernomordik L. V., Sukharev S. I., Popov S. V., Pastushenko V. F., Sokirko A. V., Abidor I. G., Chizmadzhev Y. A. The electrical breakdown of cell and lipid membranes: the similarity of phenomenologies. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1987 Sep 3;902(3):360–373. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(87)90204-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chernomordik L., Chanturiya A., Green J., Zimmerberg J. The hemifusion intermediate and its conversion to complete fusion: regulation by membrane composition. Biophys J. 1995 Sep;69(3):922–929. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)79966-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chernomordik L., Kozlov M. M., Zimmerberg J. Lipids in biological membrane fusion. J Membr Biol. 1995 Jul;146(1):1–14. doi: 10.1007/BF00232676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chernomordik L. Non-bilayer lipids and biological fusion intermediates. Chem Phys Lipids. 1996 Jul 15;81(2):203–213. doi: 10.1016/0009-3084(96)02583-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chizmadzhev Y. A., Cohen F. S., Shcherbakov A., Zimmerberg J. Membrane mechanics can account for fusion pore dilation in stages. Biophys J. 1995 Dec;69(6):2489–2500. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80119-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chizmadzhev Y. A., Kumenko D. A., Kuzmin P. I., Chernomordik L. V., Zimmerberg J., Cohen F. S. Lipid flow through fusion pores connecting membranes of different tensions. Biophys J. 1999 Jun;76(6):2951–2965. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77450-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chizmadzhev Y. A., Kuzmin P. I., Kumenko D. A., Zimmerberg J., Cohen F. S. Dynamics of fusion pores connecting membranes of different tensions. Biophys J. 2000 May;78(5):2241–2256. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76771-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Clague M. J., Schoch C., Zech L., Blumenthal R. Gating kinetics of pH-activated membrane fusion of vesicular stomatitis virus with cells: stopped-flow measurements by dequenching of octadecylrhodamine fluorescence. Biochemistry. 1990 Feb 6;29(5):1303–1308. doi: 10.1021/bi00457a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Frolov V. A., Cho M. S., Bronk P., Reese T. S., Zimmerberg J. Multiple local contact sites are induced by GPI-linked influenza hemagglutinin during hemifusion and flickering pore formation. Traffic. 2000 Aug;1(8):622–630. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2000.010806.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fuller N., Rand R. P. The influence of lysolipids on the spontaneous curvature and bending elasticity of phospholipid membranes. Biophys J. 2001 Jul;81(1):243–254. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75695-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Goñi F. M., Alonso A. Membrane fusion induced by phospholipase C and sphingomyelinases. Biosci Rep. 2000 Dec;20(6):443–463. doi: 10.1023/a:1010450702670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Helfrich W. Elastic properties of lipid bilayers: theory and possible experiments. Z Naturforsch C. 1973 Nov-Dec;28(11):693–703. doi: 10.1515/znc-1973-11-1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hildebrandt E., Albanesi J. P. Identification of a membrane-bound, glycol-stimulated phospholipase A2 located in the secretory granules of the adrenal medulla. Biochemistry. 1991 Jan 15;30(2):464–472. doi: 10.1021/bi00216a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hinshaw J. E. Dynamin and its role in membrane fission. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2000;16:483–519. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hui S. W., Stewart T. P., Boni L. T., Yeagle P. L. Membrane fusion through point defects in bilayers. Science. 1981 May 22;212(4497):921–923. doi: 10.1126/science.7233185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jahn R., Südhof T. C. Membrane fusion and exocytosis. Annu Rev Biochem. 1999;68:863–911. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kozlov M. M., Leikin S. L., Chernomordik L. V., Markin V. S., Chizmadzhev Y. A. Stalk mechanism of vesicle fusion. Intermixing of aqueous contents. Eur Biophys J. 1989;17(3):121–129. doi: 10.1007/BF00254765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kozlov M. M., Markin V. S. Vozmozhnyi mekhanizm sliiania membran. Biofizika. 1983 Mar-Apr;28(2):242–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kuzmin P. I., Zimmerberg J., Chizmadzhev Y. A., Cohen F. S. A quantitative model for membrane fusion based on low-energy intermediates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jun 12;98(13):7235–7240. doi: 10.1073/pnas.121191898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee J., Lentz B. R. Secretory and viral fusion may share mechanistic events with fusion between curved lipid bilayers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Aug 4;95(16):9274–9279. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Leikin S. L., Kozlov M. M., Chernomordik L. V., Markin V. S., Chizmadzhev Y. A. Membrane fusion: overcoming of the hydration barrier and local restructuring. J Theor Biol. 1987 Dec 21;129(4):411–425. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80021-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. MacKintosh FC, Lubensky TC. Orientational order, topology, and vesicle shapes. Phys Rev Lett. 1991 Aug 26;67(9):1169–1172. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Markin V. S., Hudspeth A. J. To fuse or not to fuse? Biophys J. 1993 Nov;65(5):1752–1754. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81230-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Markin V. S., Kozlov M. M., Borovjagin V. L. On the theory of membrane fusion. The stalk mechanism. Gen Physiol Biophys. 1984 Oct;3(5):361–377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Markin V. S., Tanelian D. L., Jersild R. A., Jr, Ochs S. Biomechanics of stretch-induced beading. Biophys J. 1999 May;76(5):2852–2860. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77439-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. May S. Protein-induced bilayer deformations: the lipid tilt degree of freedom. Eur Biophys J. 2000;29(1):17–28. doi: 10.1007/s002490050247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Melikov K. C., Frolov V. A., Shcherbakov A., Samsonov A. V., Chizmadzhev Y. A., Chernomordik L. V. Voltage-induced nonconductive pre-pores and metastable single pores in unmodified planar lipid bilayer. Biophys J. 2001 Apr;80(4):1829–1836. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76153-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Melikyan G. B., Brener S. A., Ok D. C., Cohen F. S. Inner but not outer membrane leaflets control the transition from glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored influenza hemagglutinin-induced hemifusion to full fusion. J Cell Biol. 1997 Mar 10;136(5):995–1005. doi: 10.1083/jcb.136.5.995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Melikyan G. B., Markosyan R. M., Roth M. G., Cohen F. S. A point mutation in the transmembrane domain of the hemagglutinin of influenza virus stabilizes a hemifusion intermediate that can transit to fusion. Mol Biol Cell. 2000 Nov;11(11):3765–3775. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.11.3765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Monck J. R., Fernandez J. M. The exocytotic fusion pore and neurotransmitter release. Neuron. 1994 Apr;12(4):707–716. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90325-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Monck J. R., Fernandez J. M. The fusion pore and mechanisms of biological membrane fusion. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1996 Aug;8(4):524–533. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(96)80031-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nanavati C., Markin V. S., Oberhauser A. F., Fernandez J. M. The exocytotic fusion pore modeled as a lipidic pore. Biophys J. 1992 Oct;63(4):1118–1132. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81679-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Neumann E, Kakorin S. Electroporation of curved lipid membranes in ionic strength gradients. Biophys Chem. 2000 Jul 15;85(2-3):249–271. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4622(00)00112-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Norris V., Raine D. J. A fission-fusion origin for life. Orig Life Evol Biosph. 1998 Oct;28(4-6):523–537. doi: 10.1023/a:1006568226145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Oberhauser A. F., Monck J. R., Fernandez J. M. Events leading to the opening and closing of the exocytotic fusion pore have markedly different temperature dependencies. Kinetic analysis of single fusion events in patch-clamped mouse mast cells. Biophys J. 1992 Mar;61(3):800–809. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81884-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ohta-Iino S., Pasenkiewicz-Gierula M., Takaoka Y., Miyagawa H., Kitamura K., Kusumi A. Fast lipid disorientation at the onset of membrane fusion revealed by molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys J. 2001 Jul;81(1):217–224. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75693-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Razinkov V. I., Cohen F. S. Sterols and sphingolipids strongly affect the growth of fusion pores induced by the hemagglutinin of influenza virus. Biochemistry. 2000 Nov 7;39(44):13462–13468. doi: 10.1021/bi0012078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schmidt A., Wolde M., Thiele C., Fest W., Kratzin H., Podtelejnikov A. V., Witke W., Huttner W. B., Söling H. D. Endophilin I mediates synaptic vesicle formation by transfer of arachidonate to lysophosphatidic acid. Nature. 1999 Sep 9;401(6749):133–141. doi: 10.1038/43613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Schneider S. W. Kiss and run mechanism in exocytosis. J Membr Biol. 2001 May 15;181(2):67–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Siegel D. P. Energetics of intermediates in membrane fusion: comparison of stalk and inverted micellar intermediate mechanisms. Biophys J. 1993 Nov;65(5):2124–2140. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81256-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Siegel D. P. The modified stalk mechanism of lamellar/inverted phase transitions and its implications for membrane fusion. Biophys J. 1999 Jan;76(1 Pt 1):291–313. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77197-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Stegmann T. Membrane fusion mechanisms: the influenza hemagglutinin paradigm and its implications for intracellular fusion. Traffic. 2000 Aug;1(8):598–604. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2000.010803.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Weigert R., Silletta M. G., Spanò S., Turacchio G., Cericola C., Colanzi A., Senatore S., Mancini R., Polishchuk E. V., Salmona M. CtBP/BARS induces fission of Golgi membranes by acylating lysophosphatidic acid. Nature. 1999 Nov 25;402(6760):429–433. doi: 10.1038/46587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zimmerberg J. Are the curves in all the right places? Traffic. 2000 Apr;1(4):366–368. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2000.010409.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zimmerberg J, Chernomordik LV. Membrane fusion. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1999 Aug 20;38(3):197–205. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(99)00029-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES