Skip to main content
Botanical Studies logoLink to Botanical Studies
. 2026 Mar 26;67:6. doi: 10.1186/s40529-026-00493-3

Both semi-dwarf and photoperiod-insensitive traits in rice were important for the Green Revolution

Cheng-Chieh Wu 1,2,#, Yi-Tzu Tseng 1,3,#, Lin-Tzu Huang 1,7, Chun-Kai Liu 1, Kai-Cheng Hsu 4, Hao-Ching Wang 5, Yue-Ie Caroline Hsing 1, Wan-Yi Chiou 6,✉
PMCID: PMC13022152  PMID: 41886194

Abstract

Background

The semi-dwarf high-yielding rice (Oryza sativa) variety IR8 was the major modern line that gave rise to the “Green Revolution” in Asia approximately 60 years ago. Although the sd1 mutation in IR8 responsible for semi-dwarfism is well known, the sequence variation, evolutionary origins, and functional impacts of SD1 haplotypes remain incompletely characterized.

Results

By analyzing whole-genome sequences from the 3K Rice Genomes Project, Taiwanese landraces, and Asian wild rice, we classified SD1 into 12 haplotypes, including two newly identified loss-of-function alleles: a 1,279-bp deletion and an E100/R340 variant. Phylogenetic and nucleotide analyses traced the origins of several haplotypes, including the widely used 383-bp deletion (DGWG type), to the wild accession W1718 in southern China, from which they were later introgressed into landraces and subsequently brought to Taiwan. Protein structural modeling further revealed that distinct amino acid substitutions affect GA20ox-2 activity by altering the catalytic pocket or local protein stability. Screening of SD1 and Hd1 genotypes showed that most modern indica varieties carry loss-of-function alleles of both sd1 and hd1, reflecting strong post–Green Revolution selection for semi-dwarfism and early maturity.

Conclusion

Our results clarify the evolutionary history and functional consequences of SD1 variation and highlight that the combined loss-of-function sd1–hd1 genotype was central to the development of high-yielding, lodging-resistant, and photoperiod-insensitive rice varieties. These findings provide a comprehensive framework for understanding key Green Revolution genes and offer guidance for future rice improvement and genome-editing strategies.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40529-026-00493-3.

Keywords: Heading date, Indels, Natural variation, Rice, Semi-dwarf, SNPs, Protein structure

Background

The “Green Revolution” of the 1960s led to a great increase in global production of rice (Oryza sativa) (Hargrove and Cabanilla 1979; Khush 1999) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) (Chapman et al. 2007). The newly developed high-yielding varieties of these two important staple crops fed the rapidly expanding world population. The key trait contributing to this higher productivity in both rice and wheat was the “semi-dwarf” trait, which is associated with the plant hormone gibberellic acid (GA) and reduces culm length without compromising yield. The new semi-dwarf varieties could withstand heavy winds and rainfall. In addition, they were resistant to lodging following treatment with a large amount of nitrogen fertilizer (Khush 1995).

The key Green Revolution variety of rice was IR8, also known as miracle rice; its semi-dwarf 1 gene (sd1) encodes GA20 oxidase-2 (GA20ox-2; Os01t0883800) (Sasaki et al. 2002; Ashikari et al. 2002; Spielmeyer et al. 2002). The parental lines of IR8 were Dee-Geo-Woo-Gen (DGWG), a Taiwanese native semi-dwarf indica landrace, and Peta, a tall Indonesian indica landrace known for its high eating quality. IR8 was bred by the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in late 1966 (Hargrove and Cabanilla 1979). Both IR8 and DGWG contain a 383-bp deletion in GA20ox-2 (sd1), affecting parts of exons 1 and 2, that leads to the loss of function (LOF) of this gene (Sasaki et al. 2002; Ashikari et al. 2002; Spielmeyer et al. 2002).

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) also occur in other sd1 mutants. The Japanese native variety Jikkoku has a Gly (G) 94 to Val (V) substitution (Kikuchi et al. 1985). Two semi-dwarf varieties developed by γ-ray radiation have SNPs in sd1: Reimei has an Asp (D) 349 to His (H) substitution from the japonica cultivar Fujiminori (Futsuhara et al. 1967), and Calrose 76 has a Leu (L) 266 to Phe (F) substitution as compared to the US japonica cultivar Calrose (Foster and Rutger 1978). The SNPs in the GA20ox-2 gene in these accessions thus represent three independent alleles leading to the semi-dwarf phenotype (Sasaki et al. 2002; Ashikari et al. 2002). A survey of additional semi-dwarf rice accessions revealed further alleles, including a 2-bp deletion causing a frameshift at amino acid (aa) 130 in Aijiao-Nante (indica); an SNP in Zhayeqing 8 (indica) resulting in a substitution of Pro (P) 240 to Leu (L); and another SNP in 9311 (indica), replacing Tyr (Y) 342 with a stop codon and causing early translational termination (Tyr342*) (Asano et al. 2007). More recently, a new sd1 allele in Pusa 1652, a γ-ray–induced mutant of the short-grain aromatic landrace Bindli in India, was reported to introduce a premature stop codon (Tyr300*) (Bhuvaneswari et al. 2020).

The SD1 gene has been revealed to be a target of selection during early rice domestication. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping was conducted to identify the genetic basis of culm length using backcross inbred lines derived from a cross between the japonica rice variety Nipponbare and the indica variety Kasalath (Asano et al. 2011). High-resolution mapping with approximately 5,000 plants segregating at the qCL1 locus indicated that the target gene was SD1, and that the functional nucleotide polymorphisms corresponded to amino acid substitutions: Glu (E) and Gln (Q) at residues 100 and 340 in Nipponbare, but G and Arg (R), respectively, at the same residues in Kasalath. The EQ variant of the double polymorphism exhibits lower enzymatic function. Studies focusing on landraces indicated that the GR haplotype is present in most indica and wild rice accessions, whereas EQ is predominant in japonica rice (Asano et al. 2011). A recent report indicated that the GR-EQ SNPs have existed in ancient rice populations since before domestication (Alam et al. 2025).

An analysis of the genealogy of the rice Green Revolution gene, including the DGWG and Jikkoku alleles (Nagano et al. 2005), suggested that the DGWG and Jikkoku alleles derive from different lineages. By examining the 383-bp deletion, the authors determined that the DGWG allele was present in several lines, including the IRRI indica varieties IR8 and IR36, the Taiwanese landrace Liu-T’ou-Tu, and two wild rice (O. rufipogon) accessions collected in southern China: W1718 and W1944. Because these wild rice accessions have unique polymorphisms in the region surrounding the SD1 locus, the authors suggested that the DGWG allele might have originally been present in the wild progenitors rather than being introgressed from high-yielding varieties into the nearby wild rice (Nagano et al. 2005).

GA20ox-2 catalyzes the late steps of GA biosynthesis (Ashikari et al. 2002; Spielmeyer et al. 2002; Pimenta Lange and Lange 2006). This enzyme is responsible for the early 13-hydroxylation pathway of GA biosynthesis in vascular plants (Toyomasu et al. 1997; Spielmeyer et al. 2002; Pimenta Lange and Lange 2006), which starts with the transformation of GA53 to GA44, GA19, and GA20, ultimately yielding the bioactive form GA1. That is, SD1 is involved in the reaction of GA12 and GA53 to generate the bioactive GA precursors GA9 and GA20. The contents of individual GA compounds in equivalent elongating stem segments vary between tall and semi-dwarf rice plants, including Kyeema (tall, SD1) versus Doongara (dwarf, sd1) and Calrose (tall, SD1) versus Calrose76 (dwarf, sd1) (Spielmeyer et al. 2002). In particular, the content of GA53, the initial substrate of GA20-oxidase activity, is significantly higher in the semi-dwarf rice varieties (Doongara and Calrose76) than in their tall counterparts. Additionally, the contents of GA20, the major product of the pathway, and bioactive GA1 are lower in the semi-dwarf varieties than in the other varieties (Spielmeyer et al. 2002).

In the IR8 breeding history reports, the IRRI provided a blueprint for the variety in the 1961–62 Annual Report: “a combination of short, stiff culms bearing erect, moderately sized, dark-green leaves; responsiveness in yield to fertilizer; mid-season maturity and in most cases, photoperiod sensitivity to permit double cropping practices.” And, in 1963, they performed selection of F2 plants from the Peta–DGWG cross in which “only short, early maturing plants were saved” (Khush et al. 2001; Hargrove and Coffman 2006). A few key genes are thought to affect rice sensitivity to photoperiod, such as Heading date 1 (Hd1), which encodes a B-box zinc finger protein and is the ortholog of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CONSTANS (CO) (Yano et al. 1997, 2000); Hd3a, which encodes a phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein and is the ortholog of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) (Tamaki et al. 2007); and Grain number, plant height, and heading date 7 (Ghd7), an important regulator of heading date and yield potential (Xue et al. 2008). More than 10 loss-of-function alleles of hd1 have been reported (Takahashi et al. 2009; Yano et al. 2000; Doi et al. 2004; Wu et al. 2020).

In the present study, we explored the mutation types of SD1 and their evolution in rice by analyzing changes in the SD1 sequence using the 3000 (3K) Rice Genome sequence database. Together with the 10 haplotypes discovered previously, we summarized 12 haplotypes, some of which have been used extensively in modern breeding. We studied the possible origins of some of these mutations. Using information about amino acid changes associated with the semi-dwarf trait, we also performed structural predictions to evaluate the effects of these changes on GA20-oxidase activity. We further suggest that the photoperiod-insensitive trait from DGWG also played an important role in the Green Revolution. Our findings shed light on the origins of the semi-dwarf and photoperiod-insensitive traits of rice that emerged during the Green Revolution.

Results

Many sd1 haplotypes are present in rice accessions

In the current study, we discovered previously unknown null sd1 alleles from the 3K Rice Genome sequencing data (3K-RGP 2014), a 1,279-bp deletion variant lacking the promoter, exon 1, and intron 1, and an E100/R340 (ER) variant in addition to the previously described GR and EQ. Based on this information and the previously discovered haplotypes, we classified the SD1 gene into 12 haplotypes (Table 1 and S1). Using the 3K dataset and the wild rice pan-genome data (Zhao et al. 2018), we confirmed that GR is present in most indica and all wild rice accessions, while EQ is present in most japonica accessions (Table 2). Thus, we defined GR as the type 1 (wild type) SD1 haplotype (Fig. 1a). There were no SD1-GQ-type alleles (another combination of G/E and R/Q) in the natural population.

Table 1.

Haplotypes of SD1

Haplotype Allele name Amino acid changes Position(s) on chromosome 1 Number of accessions in the 3K dataseta References
1 GR Gly100 and Arg340 38,382,764 and 38,385,057 1235 Asano et al. 2011
2 EQ Glu100 and Gln340 38,382,764 and 38,385,057 773 Asano et al. 2011
3 Jikkoku Gly94Val 38,382,746 4 Sasaki et al. 2002
4 Calrose76 Leu266Phe 38,383,363 7 Sasaki et al. 2002; Spielmeyer et al. 2002
5 Reimei Asp349His 38,385,083 9 Sasaki et al. 2002
6 New allele 1279-bp deletion 38,381,879–38,383,157 10 Current study
7 DGWG 383-bp deletion 38,382,762–38,383,144 450 Sasaki et al. 2002
8 9311 Tyr342* (early stop) 38,385,064 21 Asano et al. 2007
9 Aijiao-Nante Arg130fs (2-bp insertion) 38,382,846–38,382,847 15 Asano et al. 2007
10 Zhayeqing 8 Pro240Leu 38,383,286 50 Asano et al. 2007
11 ER Glu100 and Arg340 38,382,764 and 38,385,057 65 Current study
12 bm Tyr300* (early stop) 38,384,938 N/A Bhuvaneswari et al. 2020
Total 2639

aIncludes only accessions with high sequence quality (reads with quality ≥ Q20). Accessions carrying only type 1 or type 2 mutations were identified first; type 3–12 mutations were classified separately because these accessions may share the same amino acid substitutions at positions 100 or 340 as type 1 or 2 mutations. *, termination codon. fs, frame shift.

Table 2.

Percentages of GR, EQ, and ER at aa positions 100 and 340 in the 3K panela

indica aus admix japonica aromatic
G100/R340 80.7 73.8 61.9 0 17.9
E100/Q340 0.8 1.3 19.0 89.0 82.1
E100/R340 5.9 16.3 4.8 0.7 3.4

aOnly traditional landraces in the 3K panel were used for analysis, and only homologous alleles were counted

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Overview of SD1 haplotypes and mutation sites in rice. (a) Schematic representation of the 12 SD1 haplotypes identified in this study. Haplotypes are grouped according to subspecies (indica and japonica). Each type is labeled with the corresponding amino acid change or deletion, allele name, average plant height, and frequency in the 3K Rice Genome dataset. GR represents the wild type allele (G100/R340), whereas EQ and ER denote alternative combinations at residues 100 and 340. Indel mutations and premature stop codons are indicated. (b) Gene structure of SD1 (GA20ox-2) and positions of mutation sites. The SD1 gene contains three exons and two introns. The deleted sequences in the type 6 and 7 SD1 haplotypes are represented by horizontal gray bars. The amino acid changes caused by single-nucleotide polymorphisms or short deletions of type 2–5 and 8–10 SD1 haplotypes are shown. Amino acid substitutions are in blue. Bar, 100 bp

The remaining sd1 haplotypes were categorized as SNPs, short indels, or long deletions. As compared with the wild type, types 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 11, and 12 had SNPs causing non-synonymous aa residue changes or early stop codons (i.e., E100/Q340, G94V, L266F, D349H, Y342*, P240L, E100/R340, and Y300*, respectively). Type 9 contained a 2-bp indel that led to a frameshift at aa position 130. The 383-bp deletion of the type 7 sd1 haplotype abolished parts of exons 1 and 2 as well as intron 1. The type 6 haplotype lacked the promoter region, exon 1, and intron 1 due to a 1,279-bp deletion (Fig. 1b). Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) snapshots of the 383- and 1,279-bp deletions in SD1 showed that their 3′ ends were only 13 bp apart—at positions 38,383,145 and 38,383,158 of chromosome 1, respectively (Fig. S1)—although their 5′ ends were separated by ~ 900 bp.

To evaluate the phenotypic impact of these diverse sd1 haplotypes, we analyzed plant height data from the IRRI SNP-SEEK phenotype database (https://snp-seek.irri.org/) (Mansueto et al. 2017; Alexandrov et al. 2015). This database provides plant height information for rice cultivated at the IRRI, alongside extensive phenotypic data for approximately two-thirds of the 3K accessions. Data on culm length at heading were retrieved from the database and grouped by SD1 haplotype. Accessions excluding types 3 through 10 were categorized as GR, EQ, or ER. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant variation in plant height among the sd1 haplotypes (Table S2). Multiple comparisons demonstrated that plants carrying types 2–10 differed significantly in height from the wild type (type 1) (Fig. 2 and Table S3). The significant height reduction in plants with type 2, which lacked other structural mutations, confirmed that the GR-to-EQ substitution alone represents a mutation with reduced function, exerting a clear effect on plant height at heading. In contrast, type 11 (carrying the ER allele) exhibited the same plant height as the wild type, indicating that this mutation did not alter plant stature.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Plant height of the 11 SD1 haplotypes. Plants were grown at the International Rice Research Institute, and plant height (culm length) was measured during the heading period. The phenotype information was downloaded from the SNP-SEEK website (https://snp-seek.irri.org/). Sample number and detailed statistical data are shown in Table 1, Table S2, and Table S3. Type 1 is the wild type (GR type). Data are mean ± SD. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences at P < 0.05

To explore the presence of GR and EQ and even the intermediate allele ER in natural rice populations, we investigated the variants of the SD1 gene present in the 3K panel. Only homozygous SNPs were counted. No japonica accessions and six aromatic accessions featured the GR type; approximately 40 indica and aus accessions featured the EQ type. Details about the total number of accessions and traditional landraces with these alleles are shown in Table S4. Notably, some rice accessions harbored the SD1-ER allele (type 11): specifically, 6 japonica, 2 aromatic, 40 aus, and 154 indica accessions. These alleles were quite rare in landraces: 2 were found in japonica, 1 in aromatic, 13 in aus, and 38 in indica rice.

Accessions with type 3–5 mutations were the shortest plants among all groups. These were semi-dwarf, less short than previously reported dwarf mutants (Futsuhara et al. 1967; Foster and Rutger 1978; Kikuchi et al. 1985). However, type 3–5 plants grown in the IRRI paddy field were considerably shorter than other sd1 mutants (types 6–10). There were likely several factors contributing to these height differences. Plant height was measured at 80% heading. Since photoperiod sensitivity determines the number of days to heading, the temperate japonica lines grown in tropical regions headed significantly earlier (~ 2 months after planting) than most other sd1 mutant types (at least 3 months), which directly led to a shorter final plant height (Fig. 2 and Table S3).

Beyond these physiological factors, it is important to note that potential inconsistencies in seed purity within germplasm collections could complicate further analysis. For instance, among the two Aijiao-Nante accessions sequenced in the 3K dataset, only IRIS_313-12273 had the type 9 (2-bp) deletion. The other accession (CAAS-B060) contained the 383-bp deletion (type 7). Similar discrepancies were observed in Taichung Native 1 (TN1). As the first modern semi-dwarf variety derived from a cross between DGWG and Tsai-Yuan-Chung, TN1 is expected to inherit the type 7 null allele from DGWG. However, of the two TN1 accessions in the 3K dataset, only CX162 carried the 383-bp deletion, while CX270 did not. Furthermore, although the famous Japanese variety Koshihikari is known to lack the 383-bp deletion (Tomita 2009), the 3K accession CAAS_CX330 was unexpectedly grouped into sd1 type 7.

The origins of the SD1 haplotypes

Our above results indicated that four SD1 haplotypes were specific to japonica rice: types 3, 4, 5, and 6. Types 3 and 5 corresponded to Jikkoku and Reimei from Japan, respectively. Type 4 was Calrose 76 from the United States. Ten japonica accessions carried sd1 type 6, which harbored a 1,279-bp deletion. Plotting the geographic origins of type 6 accessions using GPS information (Gutaker et al. 2020) showed that they were all collected in mountainous regions of Laos and Thailand (Fig. S2). To determine whether haplotypes with the longer deletion (type 6) were derived from those with the shorter deletion (type 7), we performed phylogenetic analysis of the upstream and downstream 1-Mb regions of SD1. Types 6 and 7 alleles were in different clusters (with the former including only japonica accessions and the latter primarily indica accessions; Fig. S3; accessions are listed in Table S5). In addition, a SNP (C to T at position 38,383,221) was consistently associated with accessions containing the 383-bp deletion but not the 1279-bp deletion. Hence, we concluded that these two alleles were derived from different lineages. Phylogenetic analysis of the ± 1-kb region of SD1 indicated that these type 6 lines shared an extremely close relationship (Fig. S4, accessions listed in Table S6), which suggests that the mutation occurred recently. Accessions with this allele were tropical japonica accessions collected from part of the Indochina peninsula.

There were four types of sd1 mutations in indica rice. The 9311 mutation (type 8) occurred in agro in China. Aijio-Nante (type 9) harbored a mutation that also occurred in agro in the cultivar Nante in China; notably, the name Aijio is translated as low foot (semi-dwarf). Table S1 shows that 50 accessions contained the Zhayeqing 8 sd1 mutation (type 10); 21 were traditional landraces. Given that more than 95% of the traditional landraces were collected from Indonesia and Malaysia, and that phylogenetic analysis of the ± 1-kb region of SD1 indicated that the Indonesian lines were closely related to wild rice accessions (Fig. S5, accessions listed in Table S7), we conclude that type 10 arose in the insular region of Southeast Asia.

DGWG, which has the first null sd1 allele (type 7) identified, was a Taiwanese indica landrace. A previous study analyzing polymorphisms of three molecular markers (KS3, RM8278, and RM1387), located approximately 6–7 cM from the SD1 locus, suggested that this mutation first arose in wild rice in southern China and was later introgressed into local landraces or varieties (Nagano et al. 2005). Nagano et al. (2005) also noted that the Taiwanese landrace Liu-T’ou-Tu carries DGWG allele. Thus, we searched for accessions with the DGWG allele in the 3K panel and found that another Taiwanese landrace, Hsinchu-Ai-Chueh-Chien, had the same deletion. Through detailed data mining of information about landrace collections in the National Plant Genetic Resources Center (NPGRC, https://www.npgrc.tari.gov.tw), Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute (TARI), we discovered at least three additional semi-dwarf lines, including Ti-Chueh-Wu-K’o, Ai-Tzu-Ch’ung, and Liu-Tou-Tzu (Table S8; Wu et al. 2022). According to historical records, these Taiwanese landraces were introduced from Guangdong during the migration of Han people to Taiwan in the Ming and Qing dynasties, primarily between the 17th and 19th centuries (DAFTPG 1989). We confirmed that Liu-T’ou-Tu, described in Nagano et al. (2005), was identical to Liu-Tou-Tzu in the NPGRC collection but had its name misspelled. In that study, the two wild rice accessions carrying the DGWG mutation were determined to be W1718 and W1944, both from Guangdong, southern China. However, based on downloaded sequencing information (Zhao et al. 2018), only W1718, but not W1944, carried the 383-bp deletion. This may be another example of seed mixing in the stock center.

To reveal the origin of the 383-bp deletion and its presence in wild rice accessions, we chose the five Taiwanese landraces with the type 7 sd1 mutation, along with other landraces, modern varieties, and wild rice accessions, for further analysis. Figure 3 shows the SNPs from position − 1073 to + 1199 bp around the SD1 gene in 35 accessions, including landraces or modern varieties with or without the type 7 mutation, as well as 13 wild rice accessions (samples listed in Table S9). The SNP patterns of the 12 landraces and modern varieties with the 383-bp deletion, along with the wild rice accession W1718, are basically identical in the entire 2.7-kb region (including the promoter, three exons, and two introns, as well as the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions). In addition, in the region excluding the 383-bp deletion fragment, the 10 Taiwanese indica landraces without the type 7 mutation, such as Wu-Chien, Wu-K’o, and Wu-Li, share a pattern similar to that of the landraces and W1718, which contain the 383-bp deletion. However, 12 other wild rice accessions have diverse SNP patterns in this 5-kb region. This suggests that W1718 must share a very close relationship with landraces and varieties with the 383-bp deletion.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Haplotype display of sd1 type 7. The single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from position − 1,000 to position + 1,000 bp of the gene were plotted. The blue bars at the top indicate three exons. Purple, A; blue, T; green, G; red, C. Accessions are as follows (listed from top to bottom): 10 Taiwanese indica landraces: Taichung Woo Gen 2, Chiayi Wu-K’o, Taitung Woo-Li, Ti-Chueh-Hua-Lou, Ti-Chueh-Liu-Chou, Ti-Chueh-Ko-Tzu, Hua-Lou, Wu-Chan, Wu-K’o, Ai-Chueh-Ching-Yu; 13 wild rice accessions: W0123, W1739, W1754, W1777, W2012, W0141, W0170, W1698, W1979, W1943, W3078, W3095, W1718; and 12 accessions with the 383-bp deletion: Taichung Native 1, Hsinchu-Ai-Chueh-Chien, Dee-Geo-Woo-Gen, Ti-Chueh-Wu-K’o, Ai-Tzu-Chung, Liu-Tou-Tzu, Taichung Sen Yu 214, Wagwag Puti, IR64, IR 5494, X23, NON HAI. Information about the collection regions and DNA accession numbers is provided in Table S4

To explore the lineage of the type 7 sd1 mutation, we performed detailed phylogenetic analyses (Fig. S6; Table S10) of the ± 100-kb region (Fig. S6A), ± 9-Mb region (Fig. S6B), and ± 10-Mb region (Fig. S6C) around the SD1 gene as well as the whole genome (Fig. S6D). The wild rice W1718 (highlighted in purple) was tightly clustered with accessions with the type 7 mutation (highlighted in red) in the ± 100-kb region (Fig. S6A); it remained in the clade with Wu-Chien, Wu-K’o, Wu-Li, and accessions with the type 7 mutation in the ± 9-Mb region (Fig. S6B). In the phylogenetic tree for the ± 10-Mb region (Fig. S6C), however, this wild rice was separate from the clade containing cultivars, and it was placed in the wild rice clade in the phylogenetic tree based on whole-genome analysis (Fig. S6D).

To further confirm the lineage, we examined the localizations of the 8- to 10-bp tandem repeats (TRs) around the SD1 gene applying a previously developed software package that quickly scans TRs and plots them along chromosomes (Wei et al. 2016). The genes of eukaryotes, including rice (IRGSP 2005), contain highly divergent TRs (Gemayel et al. 2010; Zhao et al. 2014). TRs occupy approximately 5% of the Nipponbare rice genome (Korotkov et al. 2021). For instance, there are 6083, 4925, and 4886 copies of 8-, 9- and 10-bp TRs, respectively, in the Nipponbare RefSeq data. In the ± 1-Mb SD1 gene region, we assessed the patterns of TRs that were present only in the current accession but not in the Nipponbare genome, and TRs that were not present in the current accession (but were present in the Nipponbare genome). The patterns for the five Taiwanese landraces (Ai-Tzu-Ch’ung, DGWG, Ti-Chueh-Wu-K’o, Hsinchu-Ai-Chueh-Chien, Liu-T’ou-Tzu) and wild rice W1718 were very similar, whereas each of the four other wild rice accessions from southern China had a unique TR pattern (Fig. 4). Along with identical SNPs in the ± 1-kb region (Fig. 3), high sequence similarity around the end of the long arm of chromosome 1 was present in this specific wild rice accession a long time ago in Guangdong, southern China. These results suggest that the 383-bp deletion originated in the wild rice accession W1718 in southern China and was subsequently introgressed into neighboring landraces.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Distribution of tandem repeats (TRs) in the SD1 gene region. The ± 1-Mb regions of SD1 genes in five Taiwanese landraces with type 7 mutations and five wild rice accessions collected in southern China are shown. The accession names are indicated below. The positions of SD1 genes are marked. Red bands indicate TRs found only in the current accession compared with the Nipponbare genome, and green bands indicate TRs not in the current accession (but detected in the Nipponbare genome). TRs ranging from 8 to 10 bp with 100% identity were included in this plot. Bar, 100 kb

Our data suggest that the type 7 sd1 allele occurred in agro at least 500 years ago in southern China, before the mass migration of the Han people to Taiwan (DAFTPG 1989). Consequently, when thousands of landraces were introduced to Taiwan during this migration, some already carried the type 7 mutation. In contrast, semi-dwarf landraces carrying the 383-bp deletion were not preserved in southern China, whereas wild rice accessions such as W1718, which were not subject to human selection, continued to propagate and retained this mutation. We explored which type 7 accession(s) were brought to Taiwan by analyzing the nucleotide variation in the ± 200-kb region surrounding SD1 in five type-7 Taiwanese landraces and five wild rice accessions collected from Guangdong, China. Phylogenetic analysis placed Hsinchu-Ai-Chueh-Chien closest to wild rice (Fig. S7, accessions listed in Table S11). A Venn diagram of SNPs across the whole genomes of the five landraces revealed that DGWG and Hsinchu-Ai-Chueh-Chien possessed numerous unique SNPs (> 100,000), whereas the other three landraces had fewer unique SNPs (< 100,000) (Fig. S8). These results suggest that DGWG and Hsinchu-Ai-Chueh-Chien were the accessions most likely brought to Taiwan by Han migrants.

A selective sweep occurred only for the E100/Q340 sd1 mutation

To test early selection for the EQ allele, we analyzed traditional Asian japonica landraces that were homozygous for type 2 alleles. In total, 293 accessions were included, representing primarily temperate, subtropical, and tropical japonica from Asia (Table S12). Type 4 and type 5 mutations, which were induced by γ-ray treatment, were excluded from the analysis, as were type 8 and type 10 mutations that arose after World War II. Ten accessions carrying the type 6 allele originated from Laos and Thailand, whereas most accessions with the type 10 allele were from Indonesia and Malaysia. A relatively high number of landraces with types 6, 7, and 10 alleles were available and included in the analysis.

We assessed several parameters, including nucleotide diversity (π; Tajima 1983), Watterson’s estimator (θw; Watterson 1975), and Tajima’s D (Tajima 1989), in the ± 1-kb and ± 10-kb regions. Among the four allele types examined, only type 2 (the EQ allele) showed a significantly negative Tajima’s D (P < 0.001) (Table S13), suggesting an excess of low-frequency polymorphisms in this region. In contrast, Tajima’s D values for the other allele types were not significantly different from zero in the landrace population.

Alignment and analysis of missense mutations reveal the important domain of GA20 oxidase

The previous results showed that different alleles affected plant height. We wanted to pinpoint the location of the mutation sites in the GA20ox-2 protein structure to understand their impact on protein function. Four SD1 gene homologs are present in the rice genome: Os01g0883800 (SD1), Os05g0421900, Os03g0856700, and Os07g0169700. We generated a protein sequence alignment of the four transcripts, including the positions of GR/EQ as well as each of the missense mutations leading to the semi-dwarf phenotype (Fig. S9). We used the SD1 protein sequence from Kasalath instead of Nipponbare because we considered indica rice to be the wild type in this context. The locations of the type 3, 4, 5, and 10 LOF mutations were highly conserved. In addition, R340 of the low-functionality mutation (type 2) was conserved, but G100 was not: Os01t0883800 and Os05t0421900 had G at this position, whereas two other homologs had Asn (N). The aa changes in these positions, including those denoted 1, 2, 3, 4, and a (Fig. S9), all led to reduced plant height during heading.

We used a structural approach to explore the effects of GA20ox-2 mutations. Because no crystal structure of GA20ox-2 has been reported, its enzymatic function was inferred from pea (Pisum sativum) GA20-oxidase, which converts GA19 and 2-oxoglutarate into GA20 and succinate (García-Martínez et al. 1997). Molecular docking was performed to generate a GA20ox-2/GA binding model. The validity of the resulting models was assessed by comparison with relevant reference structures, including GA2ox3 (PDB ID: 6KU3; Takehara et al. 2020) and thebaine 6-O-demethylase (PDB ID: 5O7Y; Kluza et al. 2018). Based on these evaluations, a GA20ox-2/succinate/GA20 docking model was selected for further analysis. In addition, a GA20ox-2/GA20 binding model was generated using the GA2ox3/GA4 complex (PDB ID: 6KU3) as a template. GA20ox-2 and GA2ox3 share 42% sequence similarity, and both oxidases function in GA biosynthesis in the cytoplasm. Given this similarity in both sequence and biological function, the GA20ox-2 structure is likely to closely resemble that of GA2ox3.

Referring to the GA2ox3 structure (Takehara et al. 2020), we generated a GA20ox-2 monomer model using the MODELLER module, in which all GA20ox-2 mutation sites were labeled (Fig. 5A). This analysis indicated that three of these sites may directly affect oxidase activity. The L266F mutation (type 4) occurred directly in the active site (Fig. 5B). Because phenylalanine has a larger side chain than leucine, this substitution may disturb the interaction between succinate and GA20. In contrast, D349 and P240 were located close to the interface regions of GA2ox3 (Fig. 5C). The D349H mutation (types 1 and 5) introduced a charge reversal, while P240L (types 1 and 10) increased hydrophobicity. Both mutations may disrupt intermolecular interactions by altering the local properties at these interfaces.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Model-based analysis of GA20ox-2 encoded by the SD1 gene. (A) Model of two views of GA20ox-2 with all mutation sites labeled, generated using the MODELLER module. (B) The GA20ox-2 active site. The nearby location of Leu266 is indicated. (C) The positions of Asp349 and Pro240. The positions of the SD1 mutations in GA20ox-2 are shown in red

Apart from the three mutations described above, no further associations between GA20ox-2 activity and other mutations were evident from structural analysis. We hypothesize that mutations such as G100E and R340Q in type 2 variants may instead affect SD1 protein stability.

sd1 and hd1 mutations are common in modern indica varieties

Before the Green Revolution, most rice landraces in Southeast Asia were tall, easily lodged, late maturing, and low yielding (Khush 1987; Khush et al. 2001; Gaur et al. 2020). In contrast, TN1 and IR8 are semi-dwarf and lodging resistant. Consequently, the DGWG type has been intensively utilized in rice breeding, accounting for 17% of the accessions in the 3K panel. The next most common was Zhayeqing 8 (type 10) with 65 accessions (2.5%), while other types (3–6 and 8–9) comprised 66 accessions (Table 1). This suggests that the DGWG type was greatly favored by breeders to modulate plant height.

Another advantage of the modern varieties developed since the Green Revolution was their insensitivity to day length. To verify the genotypes of SD1 and Hd1 of major varieties in Green Revolution, we used the haplotypes defined by Wu et al. (2020) to screen the 3K dataset and several Taiwanese landraces. Table 3 lists the allele types of the SD1 and Hd1 genes in rice landraces associated with the Green Revolution. DGWG, IR8, Tsai-Yuan-Chung, and TN1 carry type 7 hd1 alleles, as also reported by Panibe et al. (2021), whereas Peta carries the type 13 hd1 allele.

Table 3.

Haplotypes of SD1 and Hd1 genes in rice landraces related to the Green Revolution

Origin SD1 haplotype Hd1 haplotypea
Hsinchu-Ai-Chueh-Chien Taiwan Type 7 Type 3
Ti-Chueh-Wu-Ko Taiwan Type 7 Type 7
Liu-Tou-Tzu Taiwan Type 7 Type 7
Ai-Tzu-Chung Taiwan Type 7 Type 7
DGWG Taiwan Type 7 Type 7
Peta Indonesia Type 1 Type 13
IR8 IRRI Type 7 Type 7
Tsai-Yuan-Chung Taiwan Type 1 Type 7
Taichung Native 1 Taiwan Type 7 Type 7

aHd1 haplotypes were defined by Wu et al. (2020)

We further assessed the distribution of hd1 haplotypes among 3K dataset accessions harboring LOF sd1 alleles, specifically quantifying those with hd1 type 7 or type 13. This dataset includes information on more than 200 accessions each from three rice-growing countries—435 from India, 248 from Indonesia, and 229 from the Philippines—including traditional landraces, which were used for further analysis. To evaluate the importance of the LOF hd1 allele in modern varieties, we calculated the ratio of non-traditional accessions to the total number of accessions for each country. The hd1 type 7 allele (represented by the DGWG haplotype) showed an 83.02% increase in frequency from before to after the Green Revolution, in contrast to only a 20.0% increase for the type 13 allele present in Peta (Table S14). According to our previous studies of Hd1, both type 7 and type 13 mutations originated in insular Southeast Asia thousands of years ago (Wu et al. 2020). This result indicates that most modern indica rice varieties inherited both LOF sd1 and hd1 alleles from DGWG.

Discussion

Before the Green Revolution, the plant height of most rice indica landraces at the maturing stage was over 160 cm (for example, 180–190 cm for Peta; Griffin 1979) and most were late maturing due to photoperiod sensitivity (Khush 1987). Since the introduction of the LOF sd1 trait, breeders have intensively used sd1 alleles to breed new varieties (Hargrove et al. 1988): for example, IR8 and IR64 in the Philippines (Khush et al. 2001) (labeled in yellow in Table S1) and Rasi and Jaya in India (Prasad et al. 2001). However, due to their partially functional SD1-EQ trait, most japonica landraces or modern varieties are 100–120 cm tall. SD1, one of the genes controlling rice plant architecture, has been an important target for early selection as well as modern breeding. Many alleles of the sd1 mutants have been studied. In the present study, we classified the mutant alleles we detected into 12 types and explored the origin of each allele. Using the 3K dataset, we also revealed that all modern indica varieties but only a few modern japonica varieties harbor the mutated alleles. This distribution pattern reflects the intensive selection for both semi-dwarfism and photoperiod insensitivity that was fundamental to the success of the Green Revolution.

Evolutionary and functional significance of the SD1-EQ allele in rice domestication and adaptation

At least 62 dwarf (d) and 15 semi-dwarf (sd) genes have been cataloged in rice (Kinoshita 1995), indicating that multiple genetic pathways can reduce plant height. However, sd1 has been the principal semi-dwarf allele incorporated into modern breeding programs. Many other dwarf-related genes influence additional agronomic traits, such as tiller number, leaf greenness, leaf morphology, and spikelet number, causing undesirable pleiotropic effects. Within the GA20 oxidase family, functional differentiation is evident. GA20ox-1 is broadly expressed and influences multiple traits, whereas GA20ox-3 and GA20ox-4 show tissue-specific expression in anthers and panicles, respectively. In contrast, GA20ox-2 (SD1) is primarily expressed in the culm and mainly affects stem elongation without substantially altering other major agronomic traits (Sakamoto et al. 2004; Table S15). This tissue-preferential expression may explain why LOF sd1 reduced plant height with relatively limited pleiotropic effects.

The SD1-EQ allele type was chosen and maintained during early japonica domestication (Asano et al. 2011; Ashikari et al. 2025; Alam et al. 2025). However, it was not introgressed into indica rice with other domestication traits, such as non-shattering (sh4; Li et al. 2006; Choi and Purugganan 2018) and closed stature (prog 1; Tan et al. 2008; Jin et al. 2008). Sanger sequencing of 72 landraces and 42 wild rice accessions revealed that the EQ type SD1 gene was selected thousands of years ago in ancient japonica landraces, suggesting that SD1 was involved in rice domestication (Asano et al. 2011). A comparison of GA20 oxidase activities of recombinant SD1-GR, SD1-EQ, SD1-GQ and SD1-ER proteins revealed that approximately three times more GA20 was produced by SD1-GR (wild type) than by the other three types, with no significant difference in GA20 production among SD1-EQ, SD1-GQ, and SD1-ER (Asano et al. 2011). The phenotypic records for these SD1-ER accessions showed that they had similar plant height to the wild type (Fig. 2, Table S3): that is, their heights did not correspond to the level of GA20ox-2 activity, as they did among EQ (type 2) accessions (Asano et al. 2011). This suggests that environmental conditions, particularly temperature and latitude, may modulate the phenotypic expression of the GR and EQ allele type.

The EQ allele has been proposed to have undergone preferential selection during japonica domestication approximately 5,000 years ago (Asano et al. 2011; Alam et al. 2025; Ashikari et al. 2025). In the 3K dataset, 89% of traditional japonica landraces are homozygous for the EQ allele, whereas approximately 81% of indica accessions contain a homozygous GR allele, and 12.6% are heterozygous (Table 2). These contrasting frequency patterns are consistent with differential historical processes acting on the SD1 locus during rice domestication and subsequent breeding. Although demographic factors such as population bottlenecks cannot be excluded, the near fixation of the EQ allele in traditional japonica landraces, together with previous studies (Zhao et al. 2018; Kou et al. 2020), supports a scenario in which the EQ allele was established early during japonica domestication.

Different spellings for the same lines may cause problems

Liu-Tou-Tzu was misspelled in another paper (Nagano et al. 2005), as noted previously. We noted other similar cases as well. “DG” in DGWG means “low foot (semi-dwarf),” and “WG” (Wu-Chien in NPGRC) means “black epiculus”; its sibling line Wu-Chien has a normal plant height. Another type 7 Taiwanese landrace, Ti-Chueh (semi-dwarf)-Wu-K’o (black glumes), also has a sibling line, Wu-K’o (with normal plant height). Both Wu-Chien and Wu-K’o are landraces whose genomes were sequenced in the 3K project. These two pairs of lines (i.e., DGWG and Wu-Chien; Ti-Chueh-Wu-K’o and Wu-K’o) were popular landraces cultivated in paddy fields in Taiwan during the Ching Dynasty (DAFTPG 1989). They are closely related to another sibling line, Wu-Li (black grain). Another semi-dwarf race, Hsinchu-Ai-Chueh-Chien, was also popular during the same period.

All these landraces were among the ~ 1000 rice lines brought to Taiwan from southern China in the late Ming Dynasty by the Han people approximately 400 years ago (DAFTPG 1989). Two Wu-K’o (Chiayi Wu-K’o, Taipei Woo-Co in IRRI) accessions are included in the 3K dataset: a Wu-Chien (Taichung Woo Gen 2) accession and a Wu-Li (Taitung Woo-Li in IRRI) accession. However, different institutes use different spellings for these accessions, such as Wu-Chien in TARI versus Woo Gen in IRRI, and in some cases one institute even uses different spellings for the same accession, such as both Wu-K’o and Woo-Co in IRRI. In summary, the Chinese word for Woo or Wu is exactly the same, but it is spelled differently by various institutes. Likewise, the terms Gen and Chien rendered in the Roman alphabet for use in English refer to the same Chinese word. Table S16 lists the Chinese and English names of these lines, including their accession numbers in different seed stock centers. This is important information for rice researchers because it may help eliminate the misuse of genetic resources.

Many modern indica varieties have functional nucleotide polymorphisms in SD1

Most japonica rice cultivars, including traditional and modern accessions, are shorter than indica landraces due to the GR-to-EQ allele variation. Such effects are reflected in modern breeding programs. Notably, few modern japonica varieties have LOF mutation of SD1 alleles. Approximately 60 japonica accessions in the 3K panel contain sd1 types 3–6, with these 4 alleles originating in japonica rice. In Taiwan, both japonica and indica rice varieties are produced and consumed, and japonica ⋅ indica crosses have often been used in breeding programs. However, no modern japonica varieties harbor the DGWG (type 7) mutation, despite the indica parental lines used in breeding carrying this allele. Thus, plant height was not a major target during the breeding of most japonica varieties. By contrast, all modern indica rice varieties contain a type 7–10 sd1 allele, and more than 400 (35%) modern varieties in the 3K dataset carry the 383-bp deletion. Thus, the sd1 type 7 allele has been used intensively in breeding programs worldwide, where the semi-dwarf trait was predominantly derived from DGWG or its progeny (Khush et al. 2001; Prasad et al. 2001). Approximately 40 varieties contain sd1 types 8 or 9, mostly modern varieties in China. Type 10, the allele from Indonesia, was used in ~ 50 accessions in Southeast Asia. Notably, indica rice production comprises ~ 80% of worldwide rice production. The mutated SD1 gene is one of the primary reasons for the increase in rice production since the mid-1960s because it leads to semi-dwarf growth habit resulting in lodging resistance and the ability to withstand heavy fertilizer applications.

Functional implications of SD1 haplotypes and applications in genome editing

We observed that plant height varied among SD1 haplotypes (Fig. 2), consistent with the findings of Ogi et al. (1993). Using isogenic lines of the japonica variety ‘Norin 29’, they demonstrated the functional effects of four sd1 alleles on culm length, internode length, and yield-related traits. When compared with Norin 29 (85.1 cm), SC-TN1 (DGWG type) showed the greatest reduction in culm length (57.5 cm), whereas SC-AJNT (Aijiao-Nante type) and SC-SRN (Jikkoku type) exhibited a less severe reduction (60.4 cm and 59.4 cm, respectively). (Ogi et al. 1993). Furthermore, Nakamura et al. (1991) analyzed protein profiles in germinating seeds of these lines and identified differential protein spots: SRP-1 in Norin 29 and SRP-2 in SC-TN1. This suggests that the sd1 mutation alters downstream protein expression (Nakamura et al. 1991). In this study, we classified the 12 SD1 haplotypes based on their mutation sites (Table 1), and we observed distinct differences in plant height among the haplotype groups (Fig. 2). The protein modeling results (Fig. 5) further suggested that the positions of these mutations have distinct impacts on GA20ox-2 protein structure and function.

While natural sd1 alleles have been extensively characterized, recent advancements have enabled the artificial generation of these traits. Two recent studies used CRISPR-Cas9 to generate semi-dwarf rice lines and analyzed the agronomic traits of the edited plants (Hu et al. 2019; Biswas et al. 2020). Hu et al. (2019) targeted the SD1 gene in two elite landraces, Kasalath (aus) and TeTePu. Using 10 or 30 randomly chosen T2 plants grown in paddy fields under natural conditions, the authors demonstrated that gene editing could rapidly create sd1 mutants. The seed production of the edited plants was better than that of the wild type under modern cultivation, while the desirable agronomic traits of these varieties (i.e., tolerance for low phosphorus in Kasalath and broad-spectrum resistance to diseases and insects in TeTePu) were maintained (Hu et al. 2019).

In contrast, Biswas et al. (2020) edited SD1 in three elite cultivars: 9815B, JIAODA138, and HUAIDAO1055. The authors investigated plant height and yield across the T3 and T4 generations using 10 independent lines (10 plants each) grown in the paddy field under natural conditions. The mutated plants showed significantly reduced seed production even though they had reduced plant height. Therefore, the authors suggested that the use of the CRISPR-Cas9 system to edit SD1 can have varying results and still requires more effort and time (Biswas et al. 2020). Considering that Biswas et al. (2020) utilized advanced generations (T3/T4), a larger number of independent lines, and more comprehensive statistical analysis, their results may provide a more robust assessment than the earlier findings of Hu et al. (2019).

Given the variable outcomes observed in previous studies, selecting the optimal target site is crucial for successful genome editing. Moreover, different sd1 alleles result in varying phenotypic effects. The results of our SD1 protein modeling should therefore be valuable in providing insights for rational design, shedding light on how to precisely manipulate plant height through SD1 modification.

The impact of DGWG on the Green Revolution

Prior to the release of IR8, the earliest semi-dwarf modern rice variety was TN1. Derived from a cross between DGWG and Tsai-Yuan-Chung performed during the second cropping season of 1949, the line designated as “Taichung Native Bred 1” was selected during the second season in 1952. It was officially released as TN1 in early 1957 and subsequently cultivated widely in Taiwan. Its full genome is available (Panibe et al. 2021). In 1966, 50 tons of TN1 seeds were shipped from Taiwan to India due to a local famine. Notably, TN1 covered a production area of 800,000 ha in India during 1968–1969. Taiwanese semi-dwarf indica germplasm served as the foundation for new varieties subsequently developed at the IRRI and elsewhere in Asia (Barker et al. 1985; Hargrove et al. 1988).

Following the era of TN1, IR8 was developed from a cross between Peta and DGWG in 1962. A single plant (the 3rd plant of line 288) in the F5 generation was selected to produce F6 (IR8-288-3) seed and was sent for testing without further selection at the time. In 1966, IR8-288-3 showed dramatic yield increases in the trials and was later named IR8 in the same year (Khush et al. 2001). Khush et al. (2001) reported that IR8 was photoperiod insensitive and matured in 130–135 days; thereafter, the IRRI devoted efforts to producing a uniform seed source of IR8.

However, this duration was not short enough to allow an additional crop season within a year. Therefore, the IRRI continued to improve the rice lines, aiming for a shorter growth duration. Subsequently, IR28 and IR36 matured in 110 days, and the growth duration for IR50 and IR58 was further reduced to 100–105 days (Khush 1987; Khush et al. 2001). Our results demonstrate that the majority of modern varieties possessing the LOF sd1 allele also carry the LOF hd1 allele, particularly in the three major indica-producing countries: India, Indonesia, and the Philippines (Table S14). This confirms the continuous selection for early maturity in rice breeding.

Most Green Revolution rice varieties are of the indica type and are grown in subtropical and tropical regions, where temperatures are suitable for plant growth year-round. Thus, changes in sensitivity to day length play an important role in their cultivation because this can increase the number of cropping seasons per year and adjust the growing season to escape from or avoid stress caused by seasonal typhoons, monsoons, or drought. As a result of combining the DGWG-derived semi-dwarf trait with photoperiod-insensitivity traits, rice production has increased tremendously since the mid-1960s.

Conclusions

This study provides a comprehensive overview of natural variation in SD1, revealing 12 haplotypes with distinct evolutionary histories and functional impacts. The GR-to-EQ amino acid changes were confirmed as ancient domestication signatures that became fixed in most traditional japonica landraces, whereas other sd1 mutations arose more recently. In particular, the 383-bp DGWG deletion was preferentially incorporated into modern indica cultivars during the Green Revolution. We also show that the loss-of-function hd1 allele from DGWG was introgressed into IR8 and many subsequent indica varieties, indicating that photoperiod insensitivity was selected alongside reduced plant height to enable early maturity and multiple cropping. Together, our findings clarify the dual genetic foundations of the Green Revolution and provide an evolutionary and functional framework that can guide future rice breeding and genome-editing strategies.

Materials and methods

Classification of SD1 haplotypes and DNA sequence analysis

To identify additional SD1 haplotypes from the public database, two whole-genome sequencing datasets were used: the Rice 3K project (3K-RGP 2014) and an Asian wild rice dataset (Zhao et al. 2018). Some Taiwanese landraces were also sequenced for comparison. Information including the accession names, seed code numbers, sd1 types, and DNA accession numbers is provided in Table S8. The paired reads were mapped against the Nipponbare IRGSP-1.0 RefSeq database (Kawahara et al. 2013; IRGSP 2005). Each VCF file of the 3K sequences was first filtered by read depth > 5 and SNP frequency > 0.8. To examine the functional impact of nucleotide variants, rice genome sequencing data were analyzed using SnpEff (Cingolani et al. 2012). Based on genome annotation, these sequence variants were classified according to their location (ORF, intron, and splice sites) and predicted functional impact (missense mutation, frame shift, and early translational termination).

Information in the SAM format was used to determine whether the paired reads were properly aligned based on insert size and orientation. The larger insert size of properly oriented paired reads indicates a possible deletion between the paired reads. To illustrate that the long deletion occurred at exons or the promoter region, snapshot images were produced using Integrative Genomics Viewer (Robinson et al. 2011; Thorvaldsdottir et al. 2013; Robinson et al. 2017) for the variant event in the next-generation sequencing mapped images of the genome for the indicated lines. Accessions carrying exclusively type 1 or type 2 mutations were first identified. Subsequently, types 3 through 12 were classified, as they may share amino acid substitutions at positions 100 or 340 with types 1 and 2.

Estimating the diversity of different SD1 haplotypes

DNA sequences were aligned using MUSCLE (Edgar 2004a, b). The − 10- to + 10-kb region of the SD1 gene, corresponding to Nipponbare genome chromosome 1 positions 38,372,466 to 38,395,208, was used for analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using DnaSP.v6 (Rozas et al. 2017). Items analyzed included the number of polymorphic (segregating) sites (S); total number of mutations (eta, η); average number of nucleotide differences (k); nucleotide diversity (π; Tajima 1983); theta (θ; per sequence) from eta (η); and Watterson’s estimator of θ (per site) from η (θw; Watterson 1975). The Tajima’s D neutrality test (Tajima 1989) was used to test the neutral mutation hypothesis. The D value is based on the discrepancy between π and θw. Thus, negative values indicate excess low-frequency polymorphism. These values were calculated after removing missing data and alignment gaps.

Phylogenetic analysis of SD1

Phylogenetic relationships were inferred from nucleotide sequences derived from the selected VCF regions. The VCF files were converted into PHYLIP format using vcf2phylip v2.6 (Ortiz 2019). The evolutionary history was reconstructed using the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method (Saitou and Nei 1987). Evolutionary distances were calculated via the Maximum Composite Likelihood method (Tamura et al. 2004), expressed as the number of base substitutions per site. To ensure data robustness, the pairwise deletion option was applied to all ambiguous positions for each sequence pair in the final analysis. Statistical support for internal nodes was assessed through a bootstrap test with 1,000 replicates (Felsenstein 1985). In the final phylogenetic trees, bootstrap values lower than 60% were collapsed to prioritize well-supported clades. All computational procedures were performed in MEGA12 (Stecher et al. 2020, 2026) using multi-threaded parallel processing to enhance computational efficiency.

Protein modeling of GA20ox-2

A crystal structure of the gene product of SD1 (i.e., GA20ox-2) is not available. Therefore, a homology model was generated using the MODELLER module (Webb and Sali 2021) implemented in the Chimera software package (Pettersen et al. 2004). The crystal structure of GA2ox3 (PDB ID: 6KU3; Takehara et al. 2020) was used as the template because this enzyme utilizes a substrate (GA4) that is structurally similar to GA20. The quality of the resulting GA20ox-2 model was assessed using the GA341 score. According to Chimera, the GA341 score reflects model reliability; a score > 0.7 indicates a probability of correct folding greater than 95% (Melo et al. 2002). The GA20ox-2 model yielded a GA341 score of 1.0, suggesting high reliability. For docking, the modeled GA20ox-2 structure was prepared using the Protein Preparation Wizard module of Maestro (Schrödinger), which added hydrogen atoms and assigned atomic charges. The compounds GA20 and succinate were prepared using the LigPrep Wizard module of Maestro (Schrödinger). Succinate was first docked into the binding site using Glide XP (Friesner et al. 2006). The docked position of succinate was considered part of the active site, after which GA20 was docked into the same binding site.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

40529_2026_493_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (826.8KB, xlsx)

Supplementary Material 1: Table S1. Accession numbers, accession names, collection regions, subspecies, and types of SD1 alleles in the 3K dataset

40529_2026_493_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (53.1KB, xlsx)

Supplementary Material 2: Table S2. ANOVA for plant height of the 11 SD1 haplotypes. Table S3. Statistical analysis of plant height for the SD1 haplotypes. Table S4. Distribution of GR, EQ, and ER at aa positions 100 and 340 in the 3K panel. Table S5. Accessions used for phylogenetic analysis of type 7 sd1 alleles. Table S6. Accessions used for phylogenetic analysis of type 6 sd1 alleles. Table S7. Accessions used for phylogenetic analysis of types 6 and 10 sd1 alleles. Table S8. Taiwanese rice landraces used in this study. Table S9. Accessions used for phylogenetic analysis of type 7 SD1 genes. Table S10. Accessions used for phylogenetic analysis of 67 accessions containing type 7 sd1 alleles. Table S11. Accessions used for phylogenetic analysis of 10 Taiwanese and wild rice accessions harboring type 7 sd1 alleles. Table S12. Accessions used to calculate the selection parameters for type 2 SD1 genes. Table S13. Selection parameters for 4 SD1 haplotypes. Table S14. Distribution of hd1 type 7 and type 13 alleles among 3K accessions with loss-of-function sd1 mutations in Asian rice-growing countries. Table S15. Gene IDs, Plant Ontology (PO) and Trait Ontology (TO) annotations of GA20ox homologs in rice. Table S16. Dee-Geo-Woo-Gen (DGWG)-related accessions and their spellings in seed stock centers

40529_2026_493_MOESM3_ESM.docx (4.8MB, docx)

Supplementary Material 3: Fig. S1. Types 6 and 7 sd1 alleles shown in Integrative Genomics Viewer images. Fig. S2. Geographic distribution of accessions harboring type 6 sd1 alleles. Fig. S3. Phylogenetic analysis of types 6 and 7 sd1 alleles. Fig. S4. Phylogenetic analysis of accessions harboring type 6 sd1 alleles. Fig. S5. Phylogenetic analysis of accessions harboring types 6 and 10 sd1 alleles. Fig. S6. Phylogenetic analysis of 67 accessions harboring type 7 sd1 alleles. Fig. S7. Phylogenetic analysis of 10 accessions harboring type 7 sd1 alleles. Fig. S8. Venn diagram of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) shared among five early landraces with type 7 sd1 mutations. Fig. S9. Alignment of GA20 oxidase homologs in the rice genome

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms. Lie-Hong Wu for maintaining the greenhouse plants, Dr. Fu-Jin Wei for assisting with the analysis of plant height data, and Dr. Dong-Hong Wu provided plant materials and related information. We also thank Ms. Laura Smales (BioMedEditing, Toronto, Canada) and Plant Editors for English editing.

Abbreviations

DGWG

Dee-Geo-Woo-Gen

Indel

Insertion and deletion

IRRI

International Rice Research Institute

LOF

Loss of function

NPGRC

National Plant Genetics Resource Center

NGS

Next-generation sequencing

ORF

Open reading frame

QTL

Quantitative trait loci

TARI

Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute

TN1

Taichung Native 1

TR

Tandem repeat

Author contributions

YICH and WYC designed the study and wrote the manuscript. CCW, YTT, CKL, and WYC performed bioinformatics analysis of the 3K and Taiwan datasets. LTH prepared high-quality genomic DNA. HCW and KCH performed protein modeling.

Funding

This project was supported by funding from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 107-2313-B-001-007-MY2), and an Academia Sinica Investigator Award to YICH, and funding from the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan (NSTC 114-2313-B-005-003-) to WYC.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and the supplementary information files. All seeds mentioned are available in the TARI or IRRI seed stock centers.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Cheng-Chieh Wu and Yi-Tzu Tseng made equal contributions to this article.

References

  1. Alam O, Gutaker R, Surya N et al (2025) Evolutionary histories of functional mutations during the domestication and spread of japonica rice in Asia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 122:e2514614122. 10.1073/pnas.2514614122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexandrov N, Tai S, Wang W et al (2015) SNP-Seek database of SNPs derived from 3000 rice genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D1023–D1027. 10.1093/nar/gku1039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Asano K, Takashi T, Miura K et al (2007) Genetic and molecular analysis of utility of sd1 alleles in rice breeding. Breed Sci 57:53–58. 10.1270/jsbbs.57.53 [Google Scholar]
  4. Asano K, Yamasaki M, Takuno S et al (2011) Artificial selection for a green revolution gene during japonica rice domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:11034–11039. 10.1073/pnas.1019490108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ashikari M, Sasaki A, Ueguchi-Tanaka M et al (2002) Loss-of-function of a Rice Gibberellin Biosynthetic Gene, GA20 oxidase (GA20ox-2), Led to the Rice Green Revolution. Breed Sci 52:143–150. 10.1270/jsbbs.52.143 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ashikari M, Nagai K, Bailey-Serres J (2025) Surviving floods: Escape and quiescence strategies of rice coping with submergence. Plant Physiol 197:kiaf029. 10.1093/plphys/kiaf029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barker R, Herdt RW, Rose B (1985) The rice economy of Asia, 1st edn. Routledge
  8. Bhuvaneswari S, Gopala Krishnan S, Ellur RK et al (2020) Discovery of a Novel Induced Polymorphism in SD1 Gene Governing Semi-Dwarfism in Rice and Development of a Functional Marker for Marker-Assisted Selection. Plants 9:1198. 10.3390/plants9091198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Biswas S, Tian J, Li R et al (2020) Investigation of CRISPR/Cas9-induced SD1 rice mutants highlights the importance of molecular characterization in plant molecular breeding. J Genet Genomics 47:273–280. 10.1016/j.jgg.2020.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chapman SC, Mathews KL, Trethowan RM, Singh RP (2007) Relationships between height and yield in near-isogenic spring wheats that contrast for major reduced height genes. Euphytica 157:391–397. 10.1007/s10681-006-9304-3 [Google Scholar]
  11. Choi JY, Purugganan MD (2018) Multiple Origin but Single Domestication Led to Oryza sativa. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 8:797–803. 10.1534/g3.117.300334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL et al (2012) A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 6:80–92. 10.4161/fly.19695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. DAFTPG (1989) The history of Taiwan rice development and production. Department of Agriculture and Forestry of the Taiwan Provincial Government
  14. Doi K, Izawa T, Fuse T et al (2004) Ehd1, a B-type response regulator in rice, confers short-day promotion of flowering and controls FT-like gene expression independently of Hd1. Genes Dev 18:926–936. 10.1101/gad.1189604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  15. Edgar RC (2004a) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797. 10.1093/nar/gkh340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Edgar RC (2004b) MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5:113. 10.1186/1471-2105-5-113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783. 10.2307/2408678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Foster KW, Rutger JN (1978) Inheritance of semidwarfism in rice, Oryza sativa L. Genetics 88:559–574. 10.1093/genetics/88.3.559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Friesner RA, Murphy RB, Repasky MP et al (2006) Extra Precision Glide: Docking and Scoring Incorporating a Model of Hydrophobic Enclosure for Protein–Ligand Complexes. J Med Chem 49:6177–6196. 10.1021/jm051256o [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Futsuhara Y, Toriyama K, Tsunoda K (1967) Breeding of a new rice variety Reimei by gamma-ray irradiation. Ikushugaku zasshi 17:85–90. 10.1270/jsbbs1951.17.85 [Google Scholar]
  21. García-Martínez JL, López-Diaz I, Sánchez-Beltrán MJ et al (1997) Isolation and transcript analysis of gibberellin 20-oxidase genes in pea and bean in relation to fruit development. Plant Mol Biol 33:1073–1084. 10.1023/A:1005715722193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gaur VS, Channappa G, Chakraborti M et al (2020) Green revolution’ dwarf gene sd1 of rice has gigantic impact. Brief Funct Genomics 19:390–409. 10.1093/bfgp/elaa019 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gemayel R, Vinces MD, Legendre M, Verstrepen KJ (2010) Variable Tandem Repeats Accelerate Evolution of Coding and Regulatory Sequences. Annu Rev Genet 44:445–477. 10.1146/annurev-genet-072610-155046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Griffin K (1979) The political economy of agrarian change: an essay on the Green Revolution. Springer
  25. Gutaker RM, Groen SC, Bellis ES et al (2020) Genomic history and ecology of the geographic spread of rice. Nat Plants 6:492–502. 10.1038/s41477-020-0659-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hargrove TR, Cabanilla VL (1979) The Impact of Semidwarf Varieties on Asian Rice-Breeding Programs. Bioscience 29:731–735. 10.2307/1307667 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hargrove T, Coffman WR (2006) Breeding history. Rice Today 5:34–38 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hargrove TR, Cabanilla VL, Coffman WR (1988) Twenty Years of Rice Breeding. Bioscience 38:675–681. 10.2307/1310869 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hu X, Cui Y, Dong G et al (2019) Using CRISPR-Cas9 to generate semi-dwarf rice lines in elite landraces. Sci Rep 9:19096. 10.1038/s41598-019-55757-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. International Rice Genome Sequencing Project, Sasaki T (2005) The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 436:793–800. 10.1038/nature03895 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jin J, Huang W, Gao J-P et al (2008) Genetic control of rice plant architecture under domestication. Nat Genet 40:1365–1369. 10.1038/ng.247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kawahara Y, De La Bastide M, Hamilton JP et al (2013) Improvement of the Oryza sativa Nipponbare reference genome using next generation sequence and optical map data. Rice 6:4. 10.1186/1939-8433-6-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Khush GS (1987) Rice breeding: Past, present and future. J Genet 66:195–216. 10.1007/BF02927713 [Google Scholar]
  34. Khush GS (1995) Modern varieties — Their real contribution to food supply and equity. GeoJournal 35:275–284. 10.1007/BF00989135 [Google Scholar]
  35. Khush GS (1999) Green revolution: preparing for the 21st century. Genome 42:646–655. 10.1139/g99-044 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Khush GS, Coffman WR, Beachell HM (2001) The history of rice breeding: IRRI’s contribution. In: Rockwood WG Rice Research and Production in 21st Century: symposium honoring, Chandler RF, Jr. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines, pp 117–135
  37. Kikuchi F, Itakura N, Ikehashi H et al (1985) Genetic analysis of semi-dwarfism in high yielding rice varieties in Japan. Bull Nat Inst Agri Sci Jap D 36:125–145 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kinoshita T (1995) Report of committee on gene symbolization, nomenclature and linkage groups. Rice Genet Newslett 12:9–154 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kluza A, Niedzialkowska E, Kurpiewska K et al (2018) Crystal structure of thebaine 6-O-demethylase from the morphine biosynthesis pathway. J Struct Biol 202:229–235. 10.1016/j.jsb.2018.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Korotkov EV, Kamionskya AM, Korotkova MA (2021) Detection of Highly Divergent Tandem Repeats in the Rice Genome. Genes 12:473. 10.3390/genes12040473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kou Y, Liao Y, Toivainen T et al (2020) Evolutionary Genomics of Structural Variation in Asian Rice (Oryza sativa) Domestication. Mol Biol Evol 37:3507–3524. 10.1093/molbev/msaa185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Li C, Zhou A, Sang T (2006) Rice Domestication by Reducing Shattering. Science 311:1936–1939. 10.1126/science.1123604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Mansueto L, Fuentes RR, Borja FN et al (2017) Rice SNP-seek database update: new SNPs, indels, and queries. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D1075–D1081. 10.1093/nar/gkw1135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Melo F, Sánchez R, Sali A (2002) Statistical potentials for fold assessment. Protein Sci 11:430–448. 10.1002/pro.110430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nagano H, Onishi K, Ogasawara M et al (2005) Genealogy of the Green Revolution gene in rice. Genes Genet Syst 80:351–356. 10.1266/ggs.80.351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Nakamura A, Hirano H, Kikuchi F (1991) Identification and genetic analysis of semidwarfism-related proteins in rice (Oryza sativa L). Theor Appl Genet 81:376–380. 10.1007/BF00228679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ogi Y, Kato H, Maruyama K, Kikuchi F (1993) The Effects on the Culm Length and Other Agronomic Characters Caused by Semidwarfing Genes at the sd-1 Locus in Rice. Ikushugaku zasshi 43:267–275. 10.1270/jsbbs1951.43.267 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ortiz EM (2019) vcf2phylip v2.0: convert a VCF matrix into several matrix formats for phylogenetic analysis. 10.5281/zenodo.2540861
  49. Panibe JP, Wang L, Li J et al (2021) Chromosomal-level genome assembly of the semi-dwarf rice Taichung Native 1, an initiator of Green Revolution. Genomics 113:2656–2674. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC et al (2004) UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25:1605–1612. 10.1002/jcc.20084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Pimenta Lange MJ, Lange T (2006) Gibberellin Biosynthesis and the Regulation of Plant Development. Plant Biol 8:281–290. 10.1055/s-2006-923882 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Prasad GSV, Prasadarao U, Rani NS et al (2001) Indian rice varieties released in countries around the world. Curr Sci 80:1508–1511 [Google Scholar]
  53. RGP K (2014) The 3,000 rice genomes project. Gigascience 3:2047–217X. 10.1186/2047-217X-3-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W et al (2011) Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol 29:24–26. 10.1038/nbt.1754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Wenger AM et al (2017) Variant Review with the Integrative Genomics Viewer. Cancer Res 77:e31–e34. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC et al (2017) DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol Biol Evol 34:3299–3302. 10.1093/molbev/msx248 [DOI] [PubMed]
  57. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 [DOI] [PubMed]
  58. Sakamoto T, Miura K, Itoh H et al (2004) An Overview of Gibberellin Metabolism Enzyme Genes and Their Related Mutants in Rice. Plant Physiol 134:1642–1653. 10.1104/pp.103.033696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sasaki A, Ashikari M, Ueguchi-Tanaka M et al (2002) A mutant gibberellin-synthesis gene in rice. Nature 416:701–702. 10.1038/416701a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Spielmeyer W, Ellis MH, Chandler PM (2002) Semidwarf (sd-1), green revolution rice, contains a defective gibberellin 20-oxidase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:9043–9048. 10.1073/pnas.132266399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Stecher G, Tamura K, Kumar S (2020) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) for macOS. Mol Biol Evol 37:1237–1239. 10.1093/molbev/msz312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Stecher G, Suleski M, Tao Q et al (2026) MEGA 12.1: Cross-Platform Release for macOS and Linux Operating Systems. J Mol Evol 94:14–18. 10.1007/s00239-025-10287-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tajima F (1983) Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics 105:437–460. 10.1093/genetics/105.2.437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Tajima F (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585–595. 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Takahashi Y, Teshima KM, Yokoi S et al (2009) Variations in Hd1 proteins, Hd3a promoters, and Ehd1 expression levels contribute to diversity of flowering time in cultivated rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:4555–4560. 10.1073/pnas.0812092106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Takehara S, Sakuraba S, Mikami B et al (2020) A common allosteric mechanism regulates homeostatic inactivation of auxin and gibberellin. Nat Commun 11:2143. 10.1038/s41467-020-16068-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Tamaki S, Matsuo S, Wong HL et al (2007) Hd3a Protein Is a Mobile Flowering Signal in Rice. Science 316:1033–1036. 10.1126/science.1141753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S (2004) Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:11030–11035. 10.1073/pnas.0404206101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Tan L, Li X, Liu F et al (2008) Control of a key transition from prostrate to erect growth in rice domestication. Nat Genet 40:1360–1364. 10.1038/ng.197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Thorvaldsdottir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP (2013) Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform 14:178–192. 10.1093/bib/bbs017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Tomita M (2009) Introgression of Green Revolution sd1 gene into isogenic genome of rice super cultivar Koshihikari to create novel semidwarf cultivar ‘Hikarishinseiki’ (Koshihikari-sd1). Field Crops Res 114:173–181. 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  72. Toyomasu T, Kawaide H, Sekimoto H et al (1997) Cloning and characterization of a cDNA encoding gibberellin 20-oxidase from rice (Oryza sativa) seedlings. Physiol Plant 99:111–118. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb03438.x [Google Scholar]
  73. Watterson GA (1975) On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol 7:256–276. 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Webb B, Sali A (2021) Protein Structure Modeling with MODELLER. In: Chen YW, Yiu C-PB (eds) Structural Genomics. Springer US, New York, NY, pp 239–255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Wei F-J, Tsai Y-C, Hsu Y-M et al (2016) Lack of Genotype and Phenotype Correlation in a Rice T-DNA Tagged Line Is Likely Caused by Introgression in the Seed Source. PLoS ONE 11:e0155768. 10.1371/journal.pone.0155768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Wu C-C, Wei F-J, Chiou W-Y et al (2020) Studies of rice Hd1 haplotypes worldwide reveal adaptation of flowering time to different environments. PLoS ONE 15:e0239028. 10.1371/journal.pone.0239028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Wu C-C, Liu C-K, Wei F-J, Crop et al (2022) Environ Bioinfor 18:12–36. 10.30061/CEB.202212_18.0002 [Google Scholar]
  78. Xue W, Xing Y, Weng X et al (2008) Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet 40:761–767. 10.1038/ng.143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Yano M, Harushima Y, Nagamura Y et al (1997) Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling heading date in rice using a high-density linkage map. Theor Appl Genet 95:1025–1032. 10.1007/s001220050658 [Google Scholar]
  80. Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M et al (2000) Hd1, a Major Photoperiod Sensitivity Quantitative Trait Locus in Rice, Is Closely Related to the Arabidopsis Flowering Time Gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell 12:2473–2483. 10.1105/tpc.12.12.2473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Zhao Z, Guo C, Sutharzan S et al (2014) Genome-wide analysis of tandem repeats in plants and green algae. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics. 4:67–78. 10.1534/g3.113.008524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  82. Zhao Q, Feng Q, Lu H et al (2018) Pan-genome analysis highlights the extent of genomic variation in cultivated and wild rice. Nat Genet 50:278–284. 10.1038/s41588-018-0041-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

40529_2026_493_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (826.8KB, xlsx)

Supplementary Material 1: Table S1. Accession numbers, accession names, collection regions, subspecies, and types of SD1 alleles in the 3K dataset

40529_2026_493_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (53.1KB, xlsx)

Supplementary Material 2: Table S2. ANOVA for plant height of the 11 SD1 haplotypes. Table S3. Statistical analysis of plant height for the SD1 haplotypes. Table S4. Distribution of GR, EQ, and ER at aa positions 100 and 340 in the 3K panel. Table S5. Accessions used for phylogenetic analysis of type 7 sd1 alleles. Table S6. Accessions used for phylogenetic analysis of type 6 sd1 alleles. Table S7. Accessions used for phylogenetic analysis of types 6 and 10 sd1 alleles. Table S8. Taiwanese rice landraces used in this study. Table S9. Accessions used for phylogenetic analysis of type 7 SD1 genes. Table S10. Accessions used for phylogenetic analysis of 67 accessions containing type 7 sd1 alleles. Table S11. Accessions used for phylogenetic analysis of 10 Taiwanese and wild rice accessions harboring type 7 sd1 alleles. Table S12. Accessions used to calculate the selection parameters for type 2 SD1 genes. Table S13. Selection parameters for 4 SD1 haplotypes. Table S14. Distribution of hd1 type 7 and type 13 alleles among 3K accessions with loss-of-function sd1 mutations in Asian rice-growing countries. Table S15. Gene IDs, Plant Ontology (PO) and Trait Ontology (TO) annotations of GA20ox homologs in rice. Table S16. Dee-Geo-Woo-Gen (DGWG)-related accessions and their spellings in seed stock centers

40529_2026_493_MOESM3_ESM.docx (4.8MB, docx)

Supplementary Material 3: Fig. S1. Types 6 and 7 sd1 alleles shown in Integrative Genomics Viewer images. Fig. S2. Geographic distribution of accessions harboring type 6 sd1 alleles. Fig. S3. Phylogenetic analysis of types 6 and 7 sd1 alleles. Fig. S4. Phylogenetic analysis of accessions harboring type 6 sd1 alleles. Fig. S5. Phylogenetic analysis of accessions harboring types 6 and 10 sd1 alleles. Fig. S6. Phylogenetic analysis of 67 accessions harboring type 7 sd1 alleles. Fig. S7. Phylogenetic analysis of 10 accessions harboring type 7 sd1 alleles. Fig. S8. Venn diagram of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) shared among five early landraces with type 7 sd1 mutations. Fig. S9. Alignment of GA20 oxidase homologs in the rice genome

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and the supplementary information files. All seeds mentioned are available in the TARI or IRRI seed stock centers.


Articles from Botanical Studies are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES