ABSTRACT
Cryptococcus neoformans is an important fungal pathogen that causes cryptococcosis, a life-threatening disease predominantly affecting immunocompromised individuals. Current estimates suggest that cryptococcosis is responsible for over 150,000 deaths annually, highlighting the need for the development of effective preventive measures. Early research utilizing polysaccharide filtrates (CneF) laid the groundwork for polysaccharide-containing vaccines, demonstrating partial protection in murine infection models. Further vaccine constructs made with purified extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) conjugated to protein carriers elicited strong antibody responses and enhanced survival. Recently, more attention was given to the purified capsule components glucuronoxylomannan (GXM) and glucuronoxylomannogalactan (GXMGal), with studies indicating that GXM conjugates can elicit protective effects. The development of semisynthetic polysaccharide-based vaccines offers a new approach to addressing lot-to-lot variability, enhancing consistency. In conclusion, strategies that advance from early crude formulations to more sophisticated conjugate and synthetic vaccines hold great promise for developing an effective vaccine to prevent and treat cryptococcal diseases.
KEYWORDS: Cryptococcus neoformans, conjugate vaccines, cryptococcosis, glucuronoxylomannan (GXM), vaccine design, polysaccharide-protein conjugates, fungal vaccines
PERSPECTIVE
Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii are fungal pathogens that cause cryptococcosis, a life-threatening disease manifesting as meningitis (1–4). Cryptococcosis affects mainly immunocompromised individuals with advanced HIV/AIDS, solid organ transplant recipients, and patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapies (1). Current estimates suggest that cryptococcal meningitis is responsible for over 150,000 AIDS-related deaths annually, mostly in Sub-Saharan Africa (3). To highlight Cryptococcus spp. as an urgent threat, the World Health Organization has indicated C. neoformans as a critical-priority fungal pathogen (5, 6). With limited treatment options, the development of a preventive vaccine is considered the most promising strategy to reduce disease burden and transmission (7, 8). However, despite decades of research, no licensed vaccine is available against Cryptococcus spp. or any other fungal pathogen. The complexity of the fungal cell, together with the fact that cryptococcosis usually occurs in immunocompromised individuals, has hindered progress (9). Nonetheless, various approaches and advances in conjugate vaccine technology, especially those targeting the cryptococcal polysaccharide capsule, show potential for the development of a functional vaccine.
The capsule makes the largest contribution to the cryptococcal virulence composite and is composed of glucuronoxylomannan (GXM) (Fig. 1A) and glucuronoxylomannogalactan (GXMGal) (previously known as galactoxylomannan or GalXM) (Fig. 1B) (10–13). This capsule plays a key role in immune evasion by preventing phagocytosis, interfering with antigen presentation, and impairing T-cell responses (14–16). Other cryptococcal virulence factors include melanin production, the formation of titan cells, the secretion of phospholipases and urease, and the ability to replicate at mammalian body temperatures (17, 18). However, the capsule remains the most distinctive and immunologically relevant element of cryptococcal virulence because it can be targeted directly in vaccine design, given the involvement of polysaccharides in tissue, and in interfering with the immune response. Hence, opsonic antibodies that neutralize the anti-phagocytic and deleterious immunomodulating properties of the cryptococcal capsule could neuter this pathogenic fungus, as evident by the fact that acapsular strains are avirulent (19).
Fig 1.
Visualization of a general organization of the polysaccharides constituting the cryptococcal capsule. (A) GXM is a branched, heterogeneous polysaccharide mainly composed of an α-(1→3)-mannose backbone with different side chains, including β-D-xylose and β-D-glucuronic acid residues. (B) GXMGal is a branched polysaccharide featuring an α-(1→6)-galactan backbone, substituted with galactose, mannose, and xylose residues. Its intricate architecture is implicated in immunomodulatory functions and capsule integrity.
THE RATIONALE FOR A CONJUGATE VACCINE APPROACH
Because polysaccharides are typically T-cell-independent antigens that elicit poor immunological memory, early vaccine efforts struggled to induce long-term protection using these antigens (20, 21). In this regard, cryptococcal polysaccharide is no exception; polysaccharide-only vaccines are not feasible due to their lack of immunogenicity. In contrast, conjugate vaccines, which are constructed by linking polysaccharide antigens to an immunogenic protein carrier, help overcome this limitation by engaging T-helper cells, promoting class switching, and inducing memory B cell responses (15, 16). This approach has been highly successful in combating encapsulated bacterial pathogens, and there are licensed conjugate vaccines for the prevention of infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae type B, and Neisseria meningitidis (16, 17). Apart from the safety and efficacy, conjugate vaccines have the advantage that specific antibodies to the polysaccharide antigen can be readily measured as a correlate of immunity. Various strategies for developing conjugate vaccines have been applied to cryptococcal vaccine development, with increasing promise (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
A summary of five conjugate vaccine formulations targeting Cryptococcus spp.a
| Vaccine type | Protein component | Polysaccharide component | Strength | Weaknesses | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude polysaccharide filtrate (CnF) | Cryptococcal proteins and cryptococcal mannoproteins | Glucuronoxylomannan and glucuronoxylomannogalactan | Easy and affordable production | Poorly defined composition | (22–26) |
| Extracellular polysaccharide conjugates | Commercial carrier protein | Glucuronoxylomannan and glucuronoxylomannogalactan |
Induce high-titer, functional antibodies | Protective efficacy depends on EPS heterogeneity | (27–29) |
| Glucuronoxylomannan conjugates | Commercial carrier protein | Glucuronoxylomannan | Target a major capsular virulence factor, induce strong IgG responses | Highly dependent on GXM structural variability | (30–32) |
| Galactoxylomannan conjugates | Commercial carrier protein | Glucuronoxylomannogalactan | Provide a distinct immunological target | Limited data on polysaccharide structure | (11, 33–35) |
| Semisynthetic polysaccharide | Commercial carrier protein | Synthetic glucuronoxylomannan decasaccharides | Highly reproducible and well-defined product | Very low yield and very high cost of production | (36, 37) |
Each vaccine includes a cryptococcal polysaccharide antigen covalently linked to a protein carrier. Protein components include traditional carriers like tetanus toxoid (TT), diphtheria toxoid (DT), CRM197, or recombinant cryptococcal proteins.
EARLY FOUNDATIONS: THE CRUDE POLYSACCHARIDE FILTRATE
The first attempt to create a conjugate vaccine for C. neoformans failed (22, 23). It is unclear why that early conjugate vaccine failed to elicit protection despite eliciting very high antibody responses, but it is possible that the abundant antibody created a prozone that abolished protective efficacy (24). In the 1990s, the laboratory adopted a different approach, using CneF, a crude culture filtrate rich in shed capsular polysaccharides, as a vaccine. Although compositionally undefined, vaccination with CneF achieved partial protection in mouse models, marked by reduced fungal burden and delayed mortality following challenges with virulent strains (25, 26). The interpretation was that this protection came from proteins in the filtrate eliciting a cell-mediated response as CneF elicited little or no antibody, consistent with its composition. These studies encouraged the development of polysaccharide-containing vaccines and provided the conceptual foundation for more refined conjugate strategies (22, 25, 26).
GXM CONJUGATES
Given that GXM constitutes over 90% of the cryptococcal capsule, it has naturally become a focal point in vaccine design. Several studies explored purified GXM conjugated to diphtheria toxoid or tetanus toxoid (30, 31). These formulations elicited strong IgG1 and IgG2a responses, resulting in significantly improved survival in murine models, with protection rates ranging from 50% to 80% depending on the challenge strain. GXM-based conjugates also enhanced fungal clearance from the lungs and brain, although the extent of protection was affected by structural variations in the GXM antigen (31, 32). Differences in acetylation, branching patterns, and molecular mass altered immunogenicity and antibody affinity, underscoring the need for either multivalent designs or the identification of conserved antigens for universal protection.
EXTRACELLULAR POLYSACCHARIDE (EPS) CONJUGATES
Subsequent strategies focused on purifying EPS from C. neoformans cultures and chemically conjugating them to protein carriers, such as CRM197 (27, 28). These conjugates consistently induced high titers of IgG against GXM, which promoted macrophage phagocytosis and extended survival in murine models. In multiple studies, EPS-based conjugates provided significant protection against a lethal challenge in vaccinated mice, depending on the strain and challenge dose (29). Passive transfer of immune sera confirmed the protective role of elicited antibodies. Another advancement was reported in a 2025 study, where we optimized EPS purification by integrating EPS profiling and filtration (29). The refined vaccine elicited broad antibody responses and offered significant protection in mice infected with virulent strains of C. neoformans. This work emphasized the importance of biophysical uniformity in polysaccharide vaccines, demonstrating that efficacy is linked not only to antigen composition but also to the molecular size of the tested antigens.
GXMGal CONJUGATES
Although GalXM is less abundant than GXM on a mass basis, it may be more abundant on a molar basis because of its much smaller molecular mass (33). It offers a structurally and immunologically distinct target (11, 34). GXMGal is rich in galactose side chains and has been shown to engage different immune receptors than GXM. The bivalent vaccines containing GXMGal- and GXM-based conjugates showed a promising synergistic effect (35). Mice immunized with GXM-GXMGal bivalent conjugates showed enhanced protection compared to those receiving either antigen alone, with some studies reporting survival rates above 80% and reduced fungal dissemination to the brain (35). These findings suggest that GXMGal may broaden and prolong vaccine-induced immunity and that future formulations may benefit from fine-tuning the ratio and presentation of GXM and GXMGal epitopes (35).
SEMISYNTHETIC POLYSACCHARIDE-BASED VACCINES
A potentially transformative advance in cryptococcal vaccine development was the development of synthetic oligosaccharides that mimic defined structural motifs of GXM and GXMGal. These semisynthetic constructs are designed using carbohydrate chemistry to reproduce immunodominant regions of the capsule and are then conjugated to carrier proteins (36). In theory, these synthetic oligosaccharides offer the possibility to focus the antibody response on the production of protective antibodies. Studies showed that synthetic GXM oligosaccharide conjugates can elicit epitope-specific, weakly opsonic antibodies (36, 37). Importantly, synthetic vaccines reduce batch-to-batch variability and enable production under defined quality control standards; however, they require further optimization to achieve satisfactory levels of protection. The ability to rationally design synthetic glycoconjugates based on structural immunology data enables precise targeting of conserved glycan epitopes. It may support the parallel development of glycan microarrays for serological diagnostics and vaccine evaluation.
POLYSACCHARIDE CONJUGATE VACCINES FOR CELLULAR IMMUNE RESPONSE INDUCTION
The existing research highlights the critical role of CD4 + T lymphocytes in controlling cryptococcal infections by naturally produced or passively administered antibodies (38–40). A balanced interplay between cellular and humoral immune responses is essential for controlling fungal load as isolated Th1 or Th17 cellular responses can lead to hyperinflammation and tissue damage and a Th2 humoral response is particularly associated with disease dissemination (33, 34). Therefore, a vaccine that can stimulate Th1, Th17, and Th2 immune responses would be the ideal candidate for a safe and effective vaccine for Cryptococcus infections, as demonstrated for other fungal infections (41). This immunoregulatory modulation can be achieved using specific adjuvants, as demonstrated for bacterial polysaccharide-conjugated vaccines (35, 36). Several studies have shown that some Cryptococcus proteins are immunogenic and can elicit a Th1 and/or Th17 immune response, leading to increased survival and reduced fungal load. One interesting approach that was never analyzed and should be considered is the polysaccharide conjugation of one of those cryptococcus antigenic proteins to GXM (42–44). This conjugation may be able to induce and equilibrate an immunoreactive response (Th1, Th17, and Th2), leading to fungal elimination without causing hyperinflammation.
CONCLUSION
Despite the formidable immunological challenges posed by Cryptococcus species, recent progress in conjugate vaccine development has yielded promising results (29, 37, 45). From early experiments with crude culture filtrates to recent work with chemically defined EPS conjugates and precision-designed synthetic oligosaccharides, each generation of vaccine has brought the field closer to a clinically viable product (25, 26). The development of a safe and effective human vaccine against Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii remains a high-priority goal. The success of some polysaccharide conjugate vaccines makes this approach promising, but further progress will require greater integration of structural glycobiology in vaccine design. Only through collective action can we fully realize the potential of conjugate vaccine strategies and transform the prevention of cryptococcal disease globally (7).
Contributor Information
Piotr R. Stempinski, Email: pstempi1@jh.edu.
Anuradha Chowdhary, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, Delhi, India.
REFERENCES
- 1. Kwon-Chung KJ, Fraser JA, Doering TL, Wang ZA, Janbon G, Idnurm A, Bahn Y-S. 2014. Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii, the etiologic agents of cryptococcosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 4:a019760–a019760. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a019760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Rodrigues ML, Alviano CS, Travassos LR. 1999. Pathogenicity of Cryptococcus neoformans: virulence factors and immunological mechanisms. Microbes Infect 1:293–301. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(99)80025-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Rajasingham R, Govender NP, Jordan A, Loyse A, Shroufi A, Denning DW, Meya DB, Chiller TM, Boulware DR. 2022. The global burden of HIV-associated cryptococcal infection in adults in 2020: a modelling analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 22:1748–1755. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00499-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Kabir Z, Cunningham C. 2022. The global burden of cryptococcosis-a neglected tropical disease? Lancet Infect Dis 22:1658–1660. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00516-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Zhao Y, Ye L, Zhao F, Zhang L, Lu Z, Chu T, Wang S, Liu Z, Sun Y, Chen M, Liao G, Ding C, Xu Y, Liao W, Wang L. 2023. Cryptococcus neoformans, a global threat to human health. Infect Dis Poverty 12:20. doi: 10.1186/s40249-023-01073-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Tan C, Wu A, Li C. 2025. Forty years of global research on WHO’s four critical priority fungal pathogens: advances and prospects. J Infect Public Health 18:102947. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2025.102947 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Caballero Van Dyke MC, Wormley FL Jr. 2018. A call to arms: quest for a cryptococcal vaccine. Trends Microbiol 26:436–446. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.10.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Iyer KR, Revie NM, Fu C, Robbins N, Cowen LE. 2021. Treatment strategies for cryptococcal infection: challenges, advances and future outlook. Nat Rev Microbiol 19:454–466. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00511-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Leopold Wager CM, Hole CR, Wozniak KL, Wormley FL. 2016. Cryptococcus and phagocytes: complex interactions that influence disease outcome. Front Microbiol 7:105. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Casadevall A, Coelho C, Cordero RJB, Dragotakes Q, Jung E, Vij R, Wear MP. 2019. The capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans. Virulence 10:822–831. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2018.1431087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. O’Meara TR, Alspaugh JA. 2012. The Cryptococcus neoformans capsule: a sword and a shield. Clin Microbiol Rev 25:387–408. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00001-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. McClelland EE, Bernhardt P, Casadevall A. 2006. Estimating the relative contributions of virulence factors for pathogenic microbes. Infect Immun 74:1500–1504. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.3.1500-1504.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Heiss C, Klutts JS, Wang Z, Doering TL, Azadi P. 2009. The structure of Cryptococcus neoformans galactoxylomannan contains beta-D-glucuronic acid. Carbohydr Res 344:915–920. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2009.03.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Vecchiarelli A, Pericolini E, Gabrielli E, Kenno S, Perito S, Cenci E, Monari C. 2013. Elucidating the immunological function of the Cryptococcus neoformans capsule. Future Microbiol 8:1107–1116. doi: 10.2217/fmb.13.84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Siddiqui AA, Shattock RJ, Harrison TS. 2006. Role of capsule and interleukin-6 in long-term immune control of Cryptococcus neoformans infection by specifically activated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Infect Immun 74:5302–5310. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00661-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Denham ST, Verma S, Reynolds RC, Worne CL, Daugherty JM, Lane TE, Brown JCS. 2018. Regulated release of cryptococcal polysaccharide drives virulence and suppresses immune cell infiltration into the central nervous system. Infect Immun 86:e00662-17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00662-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kozel TR. 1995. Virulence factors of Cryptococcus neoformans. Trends Microbiol 3:295–299. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(00)88957-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Zaragoza O. 2019. Basic principles of the virulence of Cryptococcus. Virulence 10:490–501. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2019.1614383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Chang YC, Kwon-Chung KJ. 1994. Complementation of a capsule-deficient mutation of Cryptococcus neoformans restores its virulence. Mol Cell Biol 14:4912–4919. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.7.4912-4919.1994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Anish C, Beurret M, Poolman J. 2021. Combined effects of glycan chain length and linkage type on the immunogenicity of glycoconjugate vaccines. NPJ Vaccines 6:150. doi: 10.1038/s41541-021-00409-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Sun X, Stefanetti G, Berti F, Kasper DL. 2019. Polysaccharide structure dictates mechanism of adaptive immune response to glycoconjugate vaccines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:193–198. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816401115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Goren MB, Middlebrook GM. 1967. Protein conjugates of polysaccharide from Cryptococcus neoformans. J Immunol 98:901–913. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.98.5.901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Goren MB. 1967. Experimental murine cryptococcosis: effect of hyperimmunization to capsular polysaccharide. J Immunol 98:914–922. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.98.5.914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Taborda CP, Rivera J, Zaragoza O, Casadevall A. 2003. More is not necessarily better: prozone-like effects in passive immunization with IgG. J Immunol 170:3621–3630. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.7.3621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Murphy JW. 1989. Clearance of Cryptococcus neoformans from immunologically suppressed mice. Infect Immun 57:1946–1952. doi: 10.1128/iai.57.7.1946-1952.1989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Graybill JR, Straus DC, Nealon TJ, Hague M, Paque RE. 1982. Immunogenic fractions of Cryptococcus neoformans. Mycopathologia 78:31–39. doi: 10.1007/BF00436579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Mishra RPN, Yadav RSP, Jones C, Nocadello S, Minasov G, Shuvalova LA, Anderson WF, Goel A. 2018. Structural and immunological characterization of E. coli derived recombinant CRM197 protein used as carrier in conjugate vaccines. Biosci Rep 38:BSR20180238. doi: 10.1042/BSR20180238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Tontini M, Berti F, Romano MR, Proietti D, Zambonelli C, Bottomley MJ, De Gregorio E, Del Giudice G, Rappuoli R, Costantino P, Study Group, Brogioni G, Balocchi C, Biancucci M, Malito E. 2013. Comparison of CRM197, diphtheria toxoid and tetanus toxoid as protein carriers for meningococcal glycoconjugate vaccines. Vaccine (Auckland) 31:4827–4833. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.078 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Stempinski PR, Ramos Irizarry P, McConnell SA, Liporagi Lopes LC, Rodrigues Dos Santos Júnior S, Wear MP, Casadevall A. 2025. A Cryptococcus neoformans polysaccharide conjugate vaccine made with filtered polysaccharide elicits protective immunity in mice. Fungal Biol 129:101544. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2025.101544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Devi SJ, Schneerson R, Egan W, Ulrich TJ, Bryla D, Robbins JB, Bennett JE. 1991. Cryptococcus neoformans serotype A glucuronoxylomannan-protein conjugate vaccines: synthesis, characterization, and immunogenicity. Infect Immun 59:3700–3707. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.10.3700-3707.1991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Casadevall A, Mukherjee J, Devi SJ, Schneerson R, Robbins JB, Scharff MD. 1992. Antibodies elicited by a Cryptococcus neoformans-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine have the same specificity as those elicited in infection. J Infect Dis 165:1086–1093. doi: 10.1093/infdis/165.6.1086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Devi SJ. 1996. Preclinical efficacy of a glucuronoxylomannan-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine of Cryptococcus neoformans in a murine model. Vaccine (Auckland) 14:841–844. doi: 10.1016/0264-410x(95)00256-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. McFadden DC, De Jesus M, Casadevall A. 2006. The physical properties of the capsular polysaccharides from Cryptococcus neoformans suggest features for capsule construction. J Biol Chem 281:1868–1875. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M509465200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Doering TL. 2009. How sweet it is! Cell wall biogenesis and polysaccharide capsule formation in Cryptococcus neoformans. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:223–247. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Chow S-K, Casadevall A. 2011. Evaluation of Cryptococcus neoformans galactoxylomannan-protein conjugate as vaccine candidate against murine cryptococcosis. Vaccine (Auckland) 29:1891–1898. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.12.134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Pifferi C, Fuentes R, Fernández-Tejada A. 2021. Natural and synthetic carbohydrate-based vaccine adjuvants and their mechanisms of action. Nat Rev Chem 5:197–216. doi: 10.1038/s41570-020-00244-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Crawford CJ, Liporagi-Lopes L, Coelho C, Santos Junior SR, Moraes Nicola A, Wear MP, Vij R, Oscarson S, Casadevall A. 2024. Semisynthetic glycoconjugate vaccine candidates against Cryptococcus neoformans. ACS Infect Dis 10:2089–2100. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.4c00094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Oscarson S, Alpe M, Svahnberg P, Nakouzi A, Casadevall A. 2005. Synthesis and immunological studies of glycoconjugates of Cryptococcus neoformans capsular glucuronoxylomannan oligosaccharide structures. Vaccine (Auckland) 23:3961–3972. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.02.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Yuan RR, Casadevall A, Oh J, Scharff MD. 1997. T cells cooperate with passive antibody to modify Cryptococcus neoformans infection in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:2483–2488. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Cutler JE, Deepe GS, Klein BS. 2007. Advances in combating fungal diseases: vaccines on the threshold. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:13–28. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Chechi JL, da Costa FAC, Figueiredo JM, de Souza CM, Valdez AF, Zamith-Miranda D, Camara AC, Taborda CP, Nosanchuk JD. 2023. Vaccine development for pathogenic fungi: current status and future directions. Expert Rev Vaccines 22:1136–1153. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2023.2279570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Wang R, Oliveira LVN, Hester MM, Carlson D, Christensen D, Specht CA, Levitz SM. 2024. Protection against experimental cryptococcosis elicited by cationic adjuvant formulation 01-adjuvanted subunit vaccines. PLoS Pathog 20:e1012220. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Oliveira LVN, Wang R, Specht CA, Levitz SM. 2021. Vaccines for human fungal diseases: close but still a long way to go. NPJ Vaccines 6:33. doi: 10.1038/s41541-021-00294-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Gressler AE, Volke D, Firacative C, Schnabel CL, Müller U, Krizsan A, Schulze-Richter B, Brock M, Brombacher F, Escandón P, Hoffmann R, Alber G. 2021. Identification of disease-associated cryptococcal proteins reactive with serum IgG from cryptococcal meningitis patients. Front Immunol 12:709695. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.709695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Kuttel MM, Casadevall A, Oscarson S. 2020. Cryptococcus neoformans capsular GXM conformation and epitope presentation: a molecular modelling study. Molecules 25:2651. doi: 10.3390/molecules25112651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

