Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa has long served as a model organism in microbiology, particularly for studies on gene expression, quorum sensing, antibiotic resistance, virulence and biofilm formation. Its genetic tractability has advanced the understanding of complex regulatory networks and experimental evolution. The versatility of this bacterium stems from its genomic variability, metabolic flexibility and phenotypic diversity, enabling it to thrive in diverse environments, both as a harmless saprophyte and an opportunistic human pathogen. P. aeruginosa can cause acute and chronic human infections, particularly in patients with underlying immune deficiencies. Its intrinsic antibiotic tolerance and resistance, together with its ability to produce multiple virulence factors while rapidly adapting to infection conditions, pose a major clinical challenge. In this Review, we explore key features contributing to the ecological and pathogenic versatility of P. aeruginosa. We examine the molecular mechanisms and ecological and evolutionary implications of quorum sensing and biofilm formation. We explore the virulence strategies and in vivo fitness determinants, as well as the evolutionary dynamics and global epidemiology of P. aeruginosa, with a focus on antimicrobial resistance. Finally, we discuss emerging strategies to control P. aeruginosa infections and address outstanding questions in the field.
Introduction
The Gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a multifaceted organism that, for decades, has served as a model organism in molecular biology for understanding bacterial gene expression, regulation, cell–cell communication (quorum sensing), antibiotic resistance, virulence and biofilm formation. Its genetic tractability has allowed researchers to unravel complex gene regulatory networks, and it has also proved invaluable as an organism for experimental evolution studies. P. aeruginosa was first isolated in 1882 from bandages taken from the wound infections of soldiers, and was noted to exhibit a greenish-blue colour1. This distinctive colour results from the combination of two pigmented metabolites, pyocyanin (blue) and pyoverdine (yellow–green), which defines the species term aeruginosa (verdigris: that is, aerūgō in Latin), as it resembles the blueish–green rust that forms on copper or brass by atmospheric oxidation.
P. aeruginosa is a functionally versatile organism owing to its tremendous genomic variability (Box 1), metabolic flexibility and phenotypic diversity (Box 2). These traits allow it to adapt to different habitats, resulting in a bacterium that can range from a harmless saprophyte and commensal organism to a deadly broad-host-range pathogen. Besides its environmental presence, where it is enriched in areas associated with human activity2, P. aeruginosa has become a leading opportunistic human pathogen that rarely infects healthy individuals. In individuals with compromised immune defences, P. aeruginosa can cause both acute and chronic infections, including bloodstream3, urinary tract4, eye5 and soft-tissue wound infections6 (Fig. 1a). It is also highly problematic in lung infections, especially in people with the genetic disease cystic fibrosis7, chronic pulmonary disease8 and ventilator-associated pneumonia9. Recently, the oxygen-responsive small RNA inducer of chronic infection X (SicX) has been identified as a critical chronic-to-acute switch in P. aeruginosa during mammalian infection10.
Box 1 |. Genome and genetic variation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
The versatility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in colonizing and thriving across various hosts and environments is often attributed to its relatively large genome (size varies between 5.5 and 7 megabases, guanine–cytosine content 63–65%) and ability to shape its genomic composition, resulting in a corresponding enhancement of its metabolic capacity. The first complete genome sequenced for this species was that of strain PAO1 (ref. 14), originally isolated from a chronic wound, followed by the highly virulent strain PA14 (ref. 166). PAO1 serves as the major reference strain for genetic and functional studies on P. aeruginosa. There are now hundreds of high-quality genome sequences available from environmental and clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa, whose comparative analysis has provided insights into the genetic diversity and phylogeny of this species. Pan-genome analyses had defined two major phylogroups, represented by PAO1 and PA14 strains. An additional minor group, represented by PA7, shows substantial genomic divergence from the dominant lineages. A five-phylogroups structure that includes two additional minor phylogroups, intermediate between the PAO1–PA14-like groups and the PA7-like group, has been identified167. However, clade-2 strains, including PA7, have recently been proposed to constitute a novel species (Pseudomonas paraeruginosa)168.
An examination of 5,098 genomes found the P. aeruginosa pan-genome to be composed of 126,951 non-redundant protein families, including 3,769 (3%) core gene clusters (present in at least 98% of genomes), 73,946 (58%) accessory gene clusters and 49,236 (39%) unique genes169. The P. aeruginosa core genome is highly conserved and includes approximately 62% of the average gene content for the species (n = 6,103 protein genes using 5,098 genomes). This core genome encodes a set of metabolic and pathogenic factors shared by all P. aeruginosa strains, regardless of their origin. The core genome is interspersed with regions of genomic plasticity, which comprise accessory genes that encode niche adaptation properties, such as novel catabolic pathways and antimicrobial resistance. It is important to remember that although P. aeruginosa is a well-studied organism, one-third of its genes are still uncharacterized. Horizontal gene transfer, mediated by bacteriophages and plasmids, strongly influences the evolutionary trajectories of P. aeruginosa strains, contributing to the spread of virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes167,169,170. Adaptation strategies in P. aeruginosa are not limited to the acquisition of new genes and metabolic functions. Rearrangements, mutations and genome reductive evolution are observed as active adaptation processes to niche-selective pressures, contributing to the genomic and phenotypic diversification of P. aeruginosa strains, especially among those obtained from chronic infections51,62,151,170–173. Genetic and phenotypic variation have also been observed between P. aeruginosa PAO1 strains from different laboratories and strain banks worldwide. This variability probably arises from microevolution occurring during culture and storage, which may affect the reproducibility of experiments across different research groups.
Box 2 |. Basic microbiology, physiology and phenotypic diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped, non-sporing bacterium, approximately 1–5-μm long and 0.5–1.0-μm wide, with a single polar flagellum for motility (see the figure, part a; adapted from ref. 174, Springer Nature Limited). Its genome ranges from 5.5 to 7 million base pairs. It can grow in minimal medium with a single source of carbon and energy, and is capable of metabolizing hundreds of organic compounds. P. aeruginosa preferentially catabolizes small organic acids and amino acids175. Although it can utilize carbohydrates such as glucose, it lacks a complete glycolytic pathway. As a facultative anaerobe, P. aeruginosa relies on five terminal oxidases for aerobic respiration and can use denitrification enzymes under anaerobic conditions. In the absence of terminal respiratory electron acceptors (oxygen and nitrogen oxides), P. aeruginosa can slowly grow anaerobically with arginine or utilize pyruvate fermentation176. Carbon sources and nutritional cues strongly influence its physiology and pathogenesis10,177,178. P. aeruginosa can survive in a broad range of temperatures (4–42 °C), with an optimal growth temperature of 37 °C. The production of 2-amino-acetophenone gives P. aeruginosa its characteristic sweet, grape-like odour179. When grown on blood agar, it exhibits β-haemolysis with a greenish, metallic sheen (see the figure, part b; adapted from ref. 180, CC BY 4.0). Catalase positive, it has three main catalase genes (katA, katB and katE)181. P. aeruginosa produces numerous soluble pigments, including the siderophore pyoverdine (yellow–green and fluorescent)182,183, the phenazine pyocyanin (blue–green)182,184, pyomelanin (brown–black)182,185 and pyorubin (red–brown)185 (see the figure, part c; reprinted with permission from ref. 182, Elsevier). P. aeruginosa also synthesizes pyocins, which are bacteriocins that selectively kill other susceptible P. aeruginosa strains and contribute to intraspecies competition186.
The phenotypic variability among P. aeruginosa isolates arises from genetic changes and correlates with variations in gene expression in response to environmental cues, with key levels of control for physiology and pathogenesis including gene induction, transcription, translation and small RNA regulation. P. aeruginosa exhibits a variety of colony morphologies. Small colony variants are slow-growing bacterial subpopulations that emerge under stress, such as low oxygen availability (see the figure, part d), and are correlated with the formation of a surface pellicle187 (see the figure, part e; adapted from ref. 187, CC BY 4.0). The mucoid colony appearance, due to overproduction of alginate, is typical of chronic infections, especially in cystic fibrosis (see the figure, part d). Colony wrinkling or rugose morphology is a redox-driven morphological change that maximizes oxygen accessibility and requires the production of the exopolysaccharide Pel188 (see the figure, part f; adapted with permission from ref. 188, ASM). Autolysis occurs due to the accumulation of 2-heptyl-4-hydroxyquinoline (HHQ)189 (see the figure, part f; adapted from ref. 189, CC BY 4.0).
P. aeruginosa is highly motile, and utilizes flagellar swimming motility in liquid or in low agar concentrations190, and type 4 pili-mediated twitching motility on hard and soft surfaces190,191. It also exhibit collective swarming motility involving both pili and flagellum (see the figure, part g)190. P. aeruginosa is an avid biofilm former (see the figure, part h; adapted with permission from ref. 95, Wiley, and ref. 104, Springer Nature Limited) and is a key model organism for studying biofilm development and bacterial cell–cell communication (quorum sensing)30,32.
P. aeruginosa strains PAO1 (ref. 192) and UCBPP-PA14 (PA14)193, isolated in 1954 and 1977 respectively from human wound infections, are the most studied. Owing to its genetic tractability and fast growth rate, P. aeruginosa is a model organism in microbiology, crucial for sociomicrobiology research194, understanding microbial infections and advancing therapeutic strategies.
Fig. 1 |. Ecology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

a, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is responsible for several major infections, including respiratory tract infections (such as those in patients with cystic fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and ventilator-associated pneumonia), bloodstream infections, urinary tract infections (typically associated with catheters), eye infections (where the bacteria cause keratitis after ocular surgery or through contaminated contact lenses or eye drops), and soft-tissue infections (including acute burn wounds, chronic surgical wounds and diabetes foot infections). b, The environmental occurrence of P. aeruginosa: although P. aeruginosa is ubiquitous in nature, it is usually scarce in pristine environments and is predominantly found in locations associated with human activity. c, In health-care settings, infection and transmission of P. aeruginosa can occur through various routes, including contact with hospital staff or pre-colonized patients, contaminated ventilators, catheters, or other medical equipment and devices. The bacteria can also be found on the surfaces of sinks, drains and shower heads, and can spread through tap water. Additionally, arthropods, such as cockroaches, may serve as a potential source of transmission for P. aeruginosa.
P. aeruginosa infections are notably difficult to treat owing to their high intrinsic antibiotic tolerance or resistance, the production of multiple intra- and extracellular virulence factors, the prevalence of P. aeruginosa as a nosocomial pathogen and its rapid adaptation to infection. Therefore, P. aeruginosa, is considered a serious threat by the (CDC) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention11, and the WHO (World Health Organization) has listed P. aeruginosa among the critical priority pathogens for which research and development of new antimicrobial compounds is urgently needed. P. aeruginosa has been associated with outbreaks containing the Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (blaVIM) that provides resistance to carbapenem antibiotics, which are a key line of treatment for nosocomial P. aeruginosa infections. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant12 strains are increasing and recognized to have higher mortality rates, and there are certain P. aeruginosa sequence types that are considered ‘high risk’ as they are disseminated worldwide and highly resistant to treatment13.
In this Review, we provide an overview of the key features that contribute to the remarkable versatility of P. aeruginosa, allowing it to adapt and thrive in diverse ecological niches. To this end, we detail well-characterized and recent findings that advance our knowledge of quorum sensing and biofilm formation, from molecular mechanisms to ecological and evolutionary perspectives. We also examine traditional virulence strategies that P. aeruginosa adopts to infect various hosts, along with metabolic and stress pathways important for in vivo fitness, which allow it to be an important pathogen. Additionally, we discuss the evolutionary dynamics of P. aeruginosa in nature and within the human host, evaluating its ‘ubiquitous’ presence, environmental incidence and epidemiology, with a special focus on antimicrobial resistance, the emergence and spread of highly virulent and resistant clones (Box 3), and possible routes of transmission. Finally, we explore emerging control strategies for P. aeruginosa infections.
Box 3 |. Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a model organism: research applications and considerations for selecting laboratory versus clinical strains in research.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most extensively studied microorganisms, largely due to its genetic tractability and immense publicly available omics data. Recently, P. aeruginosa has been used as a model organism to tackle challenging problems in microbiology, including the development of a generalizable quantitative framework to validate and improve laboratory model systems195,196 and the investigation of phage–host interactions and CRISPR–Cas biology to advance phage therapeutic applications197.
The development of preclinical models that accurately replicate the natural environment is essential for understanding the function and resilience of natural microbial communities. However, quantifying ways in which a model does, and does not, recapitulate microbial physiology in natural environments has been difficult. A quantitative framework was developed to assess model accuracy by comparing P. aeruginosa gene expression during chronic human infection with that in laboratory models. The accuracy is measured by the degree in which the expression of each P. aeruginosa gene in the model deviates from that in chronic human infection108,195,198. This approach has been used to improve in vitro and in vivo models of P. aeruginosa108,196,199 and could be broadly applied to any microbial198 or polymicrobial model, environmental setting and functional measurement.
P. aeruginosa also serves as a key model organism for studying phage–bacterial immune interactions and engineering phage genomes using CRISPR–Cas systems. Bioinformatic tools have uncovered new anti-phage immune systems, including two core defence hot spots in most P. aeruginosa genomes, which may represent novel anti-phage mechanisms. Jumbo phages, with large genomes, resist DNA-targeting immune systems by protecting their DNA with a ‘phage nucleus’ structure200. Although jumbo phages show potential for antimicrobial therapy, genetic tools for studying them were previously unavailable. Recent research on P. aeruginosa jumbo phage ΦKZ has developed a CRISPR–Cas13a-based system for precise genome editing197, offering insights into phage biology. These studies highlight the role of P. aeruginosa in advancing bacterial physiology, microbial interactions and phage resistance research.
As antibiotic resistance increases, and ‘high-risk’ strains spread globally, a question to carefully consider is which bacterial strains we should use in future research? The choice is often between clinical isolates and traditional laboratory strains such as PAO1, PA14 and PAK, and there are advantages and disadvantages to both. Laboratory strains, although initially isolated from human infections, have been adapted to laboratory conditions over the course of many decades. These strains are well characterized and standardized, which makes them valuable for reproducible experiments. Their genetic makeup is relatively stable, reducing experimental variables and allowing researchers to focus on specific aspects of bacterial behaviour. Additionally, extensive background information about these strains, including their genetic sequences and metabolic pathways, supports the interpretation of experimental results across different laboratories around the world. They are also genetically tractable, making them excellent strain choices to perform detailed molecular studies on systems such as quorum sensing and biofilm formation.
Conversely, clinical isolates, which are obtained directly from recent infections or clinical settings, provide insights into real-world bacterial behaviour. These strains often exhibit unique or emerging antibiotic resistance patterns, offering valuable information for developing new strategies to combat resistant bacteria. They also display a range of pathogenic traits, which can reveal how different strains cause disease and interact with host organisms. Clinical isolates also typically present a broader genetic diversity than laboratory strains, shedding light on the evolutionary dynamics of bacterial populations and the genetic basis of various traits. Many of these isolates have adapted to form enhanced biofilms or have gained or lost certain traits that allow them to persist in the human body, enhancing our understanding of chronic infections and informing the development of new treatments or preventive measures. Research on clinical isolates could, therefore, directly impact treatment strategies and improve clinical outcomes by identifying more effective antibiotics or alternative therapies. A major disadvantage is that clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa are often phenotypically and genomically diverse, even within a single patient151,171–173. This raises important questions, such as which isolate to select for experimentation or whether we should consider working with more heterogeneous populations of P. aeruginosa rather than just single isolates. In summary, whereas laboratory strains offer controlled and reproducible research conditions, clinical isolates can provide a more accurate reflection of real-world bacterial behaviours and resistance patterns. Ultimately, the choice of strain should be guided by the context of the study and the specific research goals.
Lifestyle and ecology of P. aeruginosa
P. aeruginosa is a highly adaptable bacterium that can thrive in a range of environments, particularly environments with high organic content. This success hinges on its ability to continuously monitor its surroundings and adjust gene expression accordingly in response to external cues (for example, osmolarity, pH, temperature, iron and oxygen levels). Indeed, approximately 9% of the P. aeruginosa genome encodes either transcriptional regulators or two-component regulatory system proteins14, and so far, about 550 small RNA have been predicted in P. aeruginosa, with more than 200 characterized15–17. These regulatory mechanisms ultimately drive phenotypic changes and enable P. aeruginosa to activate substrate-specific metabolic pathways, facilitating the uptake and utilization of various carbon and nitrogen sources, as well as many other essential nutrients such as iron.
P. aeruginosa has been isolated from diverse habitats ranging from natural ecosystems18–20 to human hosts21 and even distilled water22, earning it the label of a ‘ubiquitous’ microorganism. However, recent investigations suggest that the generalized definition of P. aeruginosa as being widespread in nature may need to be reassessed2. Studies indicate that P. aeruginosa is generally rare in pristine environments but shows a higher prevalence in areas impacted by human activities (Fig. 1b). For instance, in 2020, a rigorous study evaluated environmental samples collected in three countries across three continents, alongside 16S rRNA sequence data from public databases, and performed a systematic review and meta-data analysis of published data. P. aeruginosa was found in only 12% of uncontaminated samples, with higher distribution in animal faeces and compost (32%) compared with soil and rhizosphere (7%) or environmental water (0%). Overall, the occurrence of P. aeruginosa in the environment is closely associated with high human activity compared with unpolluted habitats2. These conclusions align with older reports23,24 stating that waters polluted by humans or animals, such as sewages or urban rivers, are the most frequent sources of P. aeruginosa, suggesting that environments containing human and animal faeces are important natural reservoirs for P. aeruginosa2.
P. aeruginosa is a major pathogen in health-care settings, frequently found in hospitals — on medical devices and in moist areas — where it causes severe infections, particularly in immunocompromised patients. A key factor in its ecological versatility and adaptability is quorum system, a mechanism that coordinates gene expression across populations, regulating crucial processes for pathogenesis, including virulence and antibiotic resistance25,26. Additionally, quorum sensing enhances biofilm formation, allowing P. aeruginosa to persist on surfaces, evade the immune response and resist antimicrobial treatments, which makes these infections particularly challenging to treat27.
Quorum sensing
To adapt to diverse and dynamic environments, P. aeruginosa finely tunes gene expression at the population level through quorum sensing, which is a form of cell–cell communication used by many bacterial species to coordinate behaviours in response to cell density28. A high density of bacterial cells leads to increased concentrations of signal molecule(s) that bind(s) to and activate(s) a cognate receptor. Once activated, the receptor acts as a transcriptional regulator controlling the expression of quorum sensing target genes. Quorum sensing-dependent signal molecules have been termed autoinducers as these molecules often promote the establishment of a self-induction mechanism by which they increase their own synthesis29.
P. aeruginosa possesses a complex quorum sensing network, controlling transcription of approximately 10% of all its genes (Fig. 2a). Many of these genes encode virulence factors such as pyocyanin, hydrogen cyanide (HCN) and proteases, as well as genes encoding proteins critical for biofilm formation and antibiotic susceptibility30–34. The P. aeruginosa quorum sensing network is composed of two N-acyl-homoserine lactone-dependent systems, las and rhl, and a 2-alkyl-4(1H)-quinolone-dependent system termed here as the PQS (Pseudomonas quinolone signal) system. The las and rhl circuits consist of a LuxR-type receptor, LasR and RhlR, along with a LuxI-type synthase, LasI and RhlI, which produce the signals N-(3-oxododecanoyl)-l-homoserine lactone (3OC12-HSL) and N-butanoyl-homoserine lactone (C4-HSL), respectively35. The main signalling molecule of the pqs system is 2-heptyl-3-hydroxy-4-quinolone (PQS), which interacts with the LysR-type transcriptional regulator PqsR (also called MvfR) to modulate gene expression. The PQS synthase enzymes, encoded within the pqsABCDE operon, are responsible for generating multiple 2-alkyl-4-quinolones, including 2-heptyl-4-hydroxyquinoline (HHQ), which is converted into PQS by the monooxygenase PqsH. Although not as potent as PQS, HHQ also serves as a low-affinity signal that activates PqsR. PQS also promotes the expression of genes involved in the iron-starvation response and virulence factor production via PqsR-independent pathways34. Another key effector of the PQS system is the PqsE protein, which is required for full virulence in P. aeruginosa via a mechanism probably involving direct interaction with RhlR33,36,37. Importantly, P. aeruginosa quorum sensing mutants have been demonstrated to be less virulent than the parental strain in various plant and animal infection models38–40.
Fig. 2 |. The quorum sensing circuitry and biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

a, Together, the las, rhl and Pseudomonas Quinolone Signal (PQS) quorum sensing (QS) regulatory systems of Pseudomonas aeruginosa control hundreds of genes in response to increasing cell density. The las and rhl systems utilize the N-(3-oxododecanoyl)-l-homoserine lactone (3OC12-HSL) and N-butanoyl-homoserine lactone (C4-HSL) as autoinducers for LasR and RhlR, respectively; the PQS system uses the 2-heptyl-4-quinolone (HHQ; low-affinity signal) or 2-heptyl-3-hydroxy-4-quinolone (PQS; high-affinity signal) to activate PqsR. RhlR activity is further influenced by association with PqsE. LasR, RsaL, RhlR, PqsR and PqsE are homodimeric proteins. The regulatory systems interact with each other, as shown by the connecting bold arrows in colour. Another regulator, QscR, binds the LasI-generated 3OC12-HSL signal and activates a single linked operon, PA1891–PA1897. The headed arrows represent positive regulation and blunt-headed arrows represent negative regulation. b, Surface-associated biofilm. c, Free-floating biofilm aggregates. P. aeruginosa biofilms grown in the laboratory on solid surfaces form high-density communities that develop elaborate, mushroom-like towers. The extracellular matrix is mainly composed of exopolysaccharides (alginate, Pel and Psl), extracellular DNA (eDNA) and proteins (structural proteins, enzymes and adhesive proteins). Alginate is a negatively charged polymer of β-1,4-linked d-mannuronic acid and l-guluronic acid. Overproduction of alginate is characteristic of mucoid P. aeruginosa isolates in chronic infections, particularly in cystic fibrosis. Psl is a neutral charged, branched pentasaccharide consisting of d-mannose, l-rhamnose and d-glucose, and is the primary exopolysaccharide of the P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm matrix. Pel is a positively charged polymer of α-1,4-linked galactosamine and N-acetylgalactosamine. P. aeruginosa PA14 strain exclusively produces Pel. Psl and Pel both contribute to protection against aminoglycoside antibiotics and interact with eDNA to provide structural stability to biofilms. Bacterial cells exhibit heterogeneity in relation to their biogeography. During infection in humans, P. aeruginosa can form biofilm aggregates, with an extracellular matrix primarily composed of bacterial exopolysaccharides and eDNA, along with host polymers such as mucin and host-derived eDNA. Host immune cells surround the biofilm aggregates.
Seminal studies, primarily conducted with P. aeruginosa PAO1 and PA14 strains grown under standard conditions, have shown that the three quorum sensing systems are arranged in a hierarchical organization. Positioned at the top of the regulatory cascade, the las system activates the rhl system31,41 and the PQS system42–44, whereas the rhl system negatively affects the expression of the PQS system42,43. In turn, the PQS system positively modulates the activation of the rhl circuit44, ultimately revealing a strong interdependence between the three quorum sensing systems in these model strains. However, further studies with clinical P. aeruginosa strains revealed that this hierarchical organization is not ubiquitous. Indeed, it was discovered that some strains, both inside and outside clinical settings, carry inactivating mutations in the las quorum sensing system, primarily in LasR. In the absence of LasR activity, many of these strains have rewired the quorum sensing circuitry in a manner that results in LasR-independent activation of the rhl system45–49. Thus, these LasR-defective isolates continue to express genes controlled by the rhl system, including those encoding proteins responsible for producing important virulence factors such as rhamnolipids, HCN, elastase and pyocyanin. These observations have spurred interest in targeting RhlR, rather than LasR, as a potential target for therapeutic development50.
Although it is now clear that there is rewiring in many LasR mutants, their emergence, particularly in chronic clinical infections such as cystic fibrosis6,39,45,51–54, remains poorly understood. Experimental evolution studies have tried to understand how lasR mutants evolve, while ecological and evolutionary considerations have been made46,49. Several hypotheses as to why P. aeruginosa would lose lasR have been investigated52,55,56. A popular explanation is that lasR mutants arise as social cheaters that exploit quorum sensing-regulated extracellular public goods produced by quorum sensing-cooperating cells, without investing in the costly production of these factors. This exploitation allows lasR mutants to increase their own fitness within the population. This behaviour has been supported both under specific in vitro conditions56–58 and in vivo in murine models of acute and chronic infection59, but has never been demonstrated in human infection. Another hypothesis is that lasR mutations confer adaptive growth advantages in specific conditions and environmental settings. Increased fitness of lasR mutants has been observed in the presence of specific amino acids, low oxygen levels, high nitrogen levels, alkaline stress and antibiotics, all conditions characteristic of cystic fibrosis infections60–65. Nonetheless, these conditions could probably reflect other environmental settings, as lasR mutants have been found in diverse infection and environmental contexts apart from the cystic fibrosis lung51. It is also possible that quorum sensing may impose a fitness cost in certain environments, such as during infection, leading to the loss or rewiring of the quorum sensing hierarchy.
P. aeruginosa has an additional orphan N-acyl-homoserine lactone-responsive transcription factor, called QscR, which lacks a paired signal synthase. QscR mutants have demonstrated to be hyper-virulent in a Drosophila infection model66. Interestingly, QscR acts as a quorum sensing anti-activator, delaying the activation of the las system through an unknown mechanism, which seems to be mediated by the single set of genes regulated by QscR67. P. aeruginosa has two additional anti-activator proteins, QteE and QslA, that, unlike QscR, are not homologous to LasR and RhlR. These prevent premature activation of quorum sensing by sequestering LasR, therefore delaying the activation of quorum sensing-regulated genes. Recently, these anti-activators were demonstrated to prevent self-sensing in P. aeruginosa quorum sensing68.
From a single-cell level perspective, P. aeruginosa appears to have a graded quorum sensing response to changes in population density, with substantial heterogeneity in quorum sensing activation even at high-cell densities69,70. This cell-to-cell variation in the quorum sensing activation state has been attributed to the RsaL-driven negative regulation of the lasI transcription70. RsaL is a transcriptional regulator that represses both the lasI gene and its own expression, establishing a negative feedback loop that limits the accumulation of 3OC12-HSL beyond physiologically beneficial levels71. From an ecological and evolutionary perspective, phenotypic heterogeneity represents an adaptable trait that can confer advantages through specialization and division of labour or serve as a bet hedging strategy, allowing populations to persist in dynamic environments72. Quorum sensing in P. aeruginosa also plays a crucial role in biofilm formation by regulating the expression of genes involved in surface attachment, extracellular matrix (ECM) production and antibiotic resistance, enabling the bacteria to coordinate their behaviour and establish resilient, structured communities25–27.
Surface-associated biofilms and free-floating biofilm aggregates
Besides growing as planktonic free-swimming cells, P. aeruginosa grows as biofilms attached to biotic and abiotic surfaces (Fig. 2b) and as free-floating biofilm aggregates (Fig. 2c). Biofilms are communities of microorganisms embedded in an ECM, which can be self-produced and/or recruited from the environment. P. aeruginosa growth in biofilms increases its tolerance to antimicrobials (reviewed in ref. 73) (Fig. 3b), and biofilms are particularly problematic in chronic infections, including those in cystic fibrosis lungs, chronic wound infections and on medical devices such as catheters. Moreover, the cells within a biofilm are phenotypically diverse74, and this heterogeneity has been proposed to promote antibiotic tolerance through slow growth rates and unstable heteroresistance (Figs. 3b,c).
Fig. 3 |. Antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial tolerance and heteroresistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

a, The intrinsic, acquired and adaptive mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa are illustrated, along with examples of associated genes and proteins. Intrinsic mechanisms include low outer membrane permeability, AmpC β-lactamase production, and intrinsic or induced expression of efflux pumps (particularly MexAB–OprM and MexXY–OprM). Acquired mechanisms comprise the acquisition of antibiotic resistance genes through horizontal gene transfer or mutations leading to efflux pumps overexpression, reduced antibiotic uptake resulting from decreased levels of OprD porin, modifications in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (for example, modification of lipid A and modification or loss of O antigen side chains), hyperproduction of β-lactamases, and alterations to antibiotic targets (DNA gyrase, topoisomerase IV and ribosome). Adaptive mechanisms involve a reversible, temporary increase in resistance triggered by specific environmental signals or antibiotic pressure. b, The antimicrobial tolerance conferred by P. aeruginosa biofilm formation involves a combination of physical, physiological and genetic determinants. The physical and chemical interaction of antibiotics with components of the biofilm matrix, such as exopolysaccharides and extracellular DNA, limit their penetration. Antibiotic efficacy can be altered by several factors, including nutrients and oxygen gradients that create a heterogeneous bacterial population of slow-growing or non-dividing cells, a low metabolic activity that leads to the inactivation of the major antibiotic targets, and adaptive responses to stress — nutrient and iron starvation, oxygen limitation or oxidative stress (SOS response, stringent response) — that lead to reduced bacterial growth rates, making biofilms more tolerant to antibiotics. Oxygen molecules are required for the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are important for the bactericidal effect of antibiotics. The expression of specific genes such as the biofilm resistance locus regulator gene (brlR) and efflux pumps genes, together with high levels of the secondary messenger bis-(3′-5′)-cyclic dimeric guanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP), play a role in antibiotic tolerance mediated by P. aeruginosa biofilms. c, Examples of the main mechanisms of heteroresistance in P. aeruginosa. Heteroresistance is difficult to detect and highly unstable; the surviving subpopulation often converts to a susceptible one after the removal of the antibiotic.
The ECM, composed of both self-produced and environmental components, is primarily made up of exopolysaccharides (EPS), extracellular DNA (eDNA) and proteins. The ECM can promote attachment to both abiotic and biotic surfaces, attachment between P. aeruginosa cells, and protection from harsh environmental conditions, including the host immune response. P. aeruginosa produces at least three EPS, namely alginate, Psl and Pel, which can be cell associated or released. Generally, individual strains predominantly produce one of these EPS, with each playing a distinct role in biofilm development, maintaining cell–cell interactions and providing different physiological properties to the biofilm matrix75,76. Alginate is a negatively charged polymer of β-1,4-linked mannuronic acid and guluronic acid75, and its overproduction is a hallmark of mucoid P. aeruginosa strains isolated from infections in lungs with chronic cystic fibrosis. The mucoid phenotype in vivo is frequently associated with mutations in the anti-sigma factor-encoding mucA gene77. Biofilms composed of cells overproducing alginate are highly structured and exhibit increased resistance to tobramycin78. Alginate is not an essential component of the matrix in biofilms produced by non-mucoid strains, where Pel and/or Psl serve as the primary structural scaffold. In P. aeruginosa PAO1, the matrix is mainly composed of the EPS Psl, whereas Pel is produced at low levels, and deletion of pel genes does not significantly affect biofilm development76,79. On the other hand, the PA14 strain exclusively produces Pel76. Psl is a neutral, branched pentasaccharide consisting of glucose, mannose and rhamnose, whereas Pel is a cationic, partially de-N-acetylated linear polymer of α-1,4-N-acetylgalactosamine comprised predominantly of dimeric repeats of galactosamine and N-acetylgalactosamine80. Both Psl and Pel confer protection against aminoglycoside antibiotics79,81 and have been shown to interact with eDNA, providing structural stability to biofilms82,83.
Along with EPS, the ECM also contains eDNA and proteins. eDNA, released by cellular lysis84,85, promotes biofilm formation, stability and tolerance towards positively charged antibiotics such as aminoglycosides and antimicrobial peptides. The ECM of P. aeruginosa biofilms contains structural proteins, enzymes and adhesive proteins86,87. Among the most studied are lectins (for example, LecA88 and LecB89) and adhesins (for example, CdrA90), which contribute to biofilm stability and mediate cell–cell, cell–surface and cell–host interactions.
The secondary messenger bis-(3′-5′)-cyclic dimeric guanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP) also plays a pivotal role in the formation and regulation of P. aeruginosa biofilms. In the strain PAO1, over 40 putative diguanylate cyclases (DGCs) and phosphodiesterases (PDEs) associated with c-di-GMP turnover have been identified, several of which have been functionally characterized. Environmental cues can modulate biofilm formation by regulating the activity of DGCs and PDEs74,91,92. These cues act directly on DGCs or PDEs through their sensory domains (such as PAS, GAF or HAMP domains) or indirectly via signal transduction pathways, such as two-component systems. Changes in c-di-GMP levels directly affect its binding to effector proteins, driving phenotypes critical to biofilm dynamics, including biofilm formation, motility reduction, enhanced antibiotic resistance and increased virulence91.
Biofilms vary in size and shape, as well as their matrix components and spatial organization. They can exist either attached to a surface or as suspended aggregates, and often contain functionally heterogeneous subpopulations of cells. During human infection, P. aeruginosa often grow in biofilms, and we now recognize there are both spatial and functional differences between in vitro biofilms and in vivo biofilms93,94. P. aeruginosa biofilms grown in the laboratory on solid surfaces such as plastic or glass result in high-cell-density communities that form either flat structures or elaborate mushroom-like towers95. The inactivation of large numbers of genes has been shown to impact the structure and function of these in vitro biofilms, leading to the proposal of a developmental model for biofilm formation. The clinical relevance of these in vitro biofilm studies remains unclear, although there is reasonable evidence suggesting that they offer valuable insights into P. aeruginosa biofilms found on the surface of medical devices, such as catheters and implants96,97. Biofilm formation in vitro can also be impacted by non-biological processes such as depletion aggregation98–100. Although the importance of this aggregation mechanism in vivo is unknown, biofilm aggregation through this process can enhance antibiotic tolerance and is impacted by the chemical composition of the outer surface of P. aeruginosa98–100.
Although biofilm formation is well studied in vitro, this process is less understood during human infection. Imaging studies in human-derived samples, including chronic and acute lung infections, chronic wounds and otitis media, revealed bacteria present as biofilm aggregates that are not attached to surfaces or epithelia101–104. In human infections, aggregates vary in size, with more than 50% of the bacterial biomass present in aggregates smaller than 100 μm3 (ref. 105), in both acute and chronic human lung infections. The mechanisms producing aggregation in vivo remain unclear, although it is unlikely that the depletion aggregation mechanism plays a critical role, as the specific aggregate structures created by this mechanism have not, so far, been observed in vivo105,106. Instead, a bridging aggregation mechanism has been proposed, where the biofilm aggregate matrix extends beyond the cell to promote aggregation106. An alternative scenario suggests that P. aeruginosa actively contracts the mucus surface using retractile filaments called type IV pili (T4P), drawing aggregate cells closer107. Host polymers such as mucin and eDNA also appear to play a role in biofilm aggregate formation in vivo, speculated to be due to association with the biofilm EPS and/or receptors on the bacterial surface. Finally, biofilm aggregates in human chronic infections are surrounded by host immune cells106, which, along with the lack of planktonic cell biomass in these infections, lead to the hypothesis that biofilm aggregates are critical for surviving the robust immune response observed in many human infections74. Future studies investigating the mechanisms in vivo are essential and will require preclinical models that accurately replicate human infection biology108.
Virulence factors and in vivo fitness determinants
P. aeruginosa can infect and cause serious diseases in a range of multicellular organisms, from nematodes to humans. Its virulence is driven by a complex array of factors that enable it to infect, persist and cause damage to host tissues. As traditional P. aeruginosa virulence factors have been reviewed in depth recently25,109, here we will briefly outline some of the key virulence factors relevant to host infection (Fig. 4), then discuss the metabolic pathways important for in vivo fitness.
Fig. 4 |. Virulence factors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa employs a diverse array of virulence factors for establish infection and promote pathogenesis. The type III secretion system (T3SS) injects toxins such as ExoU, ExoT, ExoS and ExoY directly into host cells, which impair cellular homeostasis, cellular signalling pathways, cause membrane disruption and induce a pro-inflammatory response. Exotoxin A (ETA), a potent toxin secreted by the type II secretion system (T2SS), inhibits protein synthesis, leading to cell death. Additional virulence factors include proteases (AprA, PrpL, LasA and LasB) and rhamnolipids, which contribute to tissue invasion and immune evasion. Other factors, such as pyoverdine, hydrogen cyanide (HCN) and pyocyanin, promote iron chelation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis. AMP, adenosine monophosphate; EF2, elongation factor 2; PMN, polymorphonuclear leukocyte; ROS, reactive oxygen species.
Traditional virulence factors
P. aeruginosa employs several secretion systems, including the type III secretion system (T3SS), which injects toxins directly into host cells110,111. These toxins, including ExoU, ExoT, ExoS and ExoY, have distinct functions that disrupt normal cellular processes110. ExoU is a potent phospholipase that causes rapid cell death through membrane disruption, leading to tissue damage and severe inflammatory responses. ExoT and ExoS are bifunctional proteins with GTPase-activating and ADP-ribosyltransferase activities. These enzymes interfere with the host’s cytoskeleton, inhibit phagocytosis and disrupt cellular signalling pathways, thereby preventing the immune system from effectively clearing the infection. ExoY, an adenylate cyclase, disrupts cellular homeostasis by increasing cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cyclic-AMP) levels, leading to impaired barrier function and vascular leakage. The expression of the T3SS is tightly regulated by environmental signals110,111, allowing P. aeruginosa to deploy this system when in contact with host cells. Once activated, the T3SS facilitates rapid bacterial invasion and colonization, contributing to the establishment of infection and the progression of disease.
Exotoxin A (ETA) is encoded by the toxA gene and is one of the most potent virulence factors produced by P. aeruginosa112,113. ETA is secreted into the extracellular environment via the general secretory pathway (type II secretion system) where it can interact with and enter host cells. Once inside cells, ETA is an ADP-ribosylating enzyme that targets the elongation factor 2, a critical component of the protein synthesis machinery in eukaryotic cells114,115. Thus, ETA functions by inhibiting protein synthesis in host cells, leading to cell death and contributing to the bacterium’s ability to cause severe infections. ETA is particularly associated with tissue damage and necrosis, making it a major factor in the severity of acute infections. The expression of ETA is regulated by environmental factors and is typically upregulated during infection, particularly in the iron-depleted environments of infected tissues116. Owing to its potent effects and significant role in disease progression, ETA is a major target for therapeutic interventions and vaccine development in the fight against P. aeruginosa infections117.
P. aeruginosa is highly proteolytic, producing extracellular proteases such as LasB (elastase), LasA (staphylolysin), alkaline protease (AprA) and protease IV (PrpL) that degrade host proteins and promote tissue damage118. LasB degrades host ECM proteins, such as elastin and collagen, facilitating tissue invasion and bacterial dissemination. It also targets immune components, such as complement proteins and immunoglobulins, undermining host defences. LasA exhibits a limited elastolytic activity per se, but enhances the elastolytic activity of other proteases, including LasB and host elastolytic proteases, and is better known as staphylolysin, due to its ability to cleave the pentaglycine bonds in Staphylococcus aureus peptidoglycan. Alkaline protease contributes to tissue damage by degrading important components of the basal lamina and endothelium, such as fibronectin, and aids in immune evasion by disrupting host complement proteins and inflammatory responses. PrpL contributes to the degradation of the coagulation factor fibrinogen, participating in tissue invasion and vascular damaging processes during P. aeruginosa infection118.
P. aeruginosa produces an array of additional cytotoxic secreted factors that can impact disease progression, including rhamnolipids, phenazines and HCN. Rhamnolipids are biosurfactants that solubilize and promote the uptake of hydrophobic substrates, disrupt the chemotactic responses of polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and inhibit the mucociliary transport and ciliary function of the human respiratory epithelium, contributing to tissue invasion and immune evasion. These molecules also play a key role in biofilm formation and motility, and display antibacterial activity, enhancing the bacterium’s ability to colonize and persist in various environments119. Phenazines are highly diffusible toxic secondary metabolites, of which pyocyanin is the most well studied. Beyond its role in giving the bacterium its distinct blueish–green colour, pyocyanin is a redox-active compound that generates reactive oxygen species, leading to oxidative stress in host cells120. Pyocyanin has been shown to suppress ciliary function in respiratory epithelial cells, and to affect host immune responses, interfering with immune signalling pathways, disrupting macrophage activity and inducing neutrophil apoptosis120,121. HCN is a volatile cyanogenic compound produced by P. aeruginosa through the action of the hcnABC-encoded hydrogen cyanide synthase. HCN is highly toxic to host cells, primarily due to its ability to inhibit cytochrome c oxidase in the mitochondrial electron transport chain122,123. This inhibition disrupts cellular respiration, leading to energy depletion and cell death.
Nutritional adaptation and metabolic requirements for virulence
The successful colonization and persistence of P. aeruginosa in diverse host environments depend on its ability to acquire essential nutrients despite host-imposed nutritional immunity. Nutritional immunity is a host innate immune defence strategy in which essential nutrients (such as iron, zinc and manganese) are sequestered by the host, thereby limiting the ability of pathogens to grow and cause infection. P. aeruginosa possesses an array of mechanisms for acquiring host sequestered metals, with the most elaborate and well studied being iron acquisition. Although iron is an essential cofactor for numerous P. aeruginosa enzymes, free iron is scarce in the host environment due to sequestration by host proteins such as transferrin and lactoferrin. Aside from scavenging iron directly from host haem-containing proteins, P. aeruginosa also synthesizes siderophores. The two siderophores, pyochelin and pyoverdine, are characterized by low and high affinities for iron, respectively, and enable P. aeruginosa to thrive in iron-limited environments, such as those encountered during infection124. Beyond its role in iron acquisition, pyoverdine contributes to P. aeruginosa virulence by inducing oxidative stress in host tissues and regulating the production of other virulence factors, including exotoxin A, the endoprotease PrpL and additional pyoverdine. This regulation occurs via a transmembrane signalling cascade that ultimately activates the alternative sigma factor PvdS, which controls the expression of these genes125.
Beyond metal acquisition, results from transposon sequencing (Tn-seq) studies have identified key metabolic pathways that are critical for the growth and virulence of P. aeruginosa across different infection sites.
Tn-seq studies in murine models of chronic and acute wounds revealed that the synthesis of several nutrients, including purines, branch chain amino acids and vitamins (for example, riboflavin and p-aminobenzoate), are critical for P. aeruginosa virulence in these infection models6. Although P. aeruginosa can utilize a wide range of molecules as sources of carbon and energy, this study also revealed that the catabolism of long-chain fatty acids is crucial for P. aeruginosa fitness in murine wound models, with the inactivation of the fatty acid oxidation genes faoAB significantly reducing fitness and virulence in these models6. This suggests that long-chain fatty acids (C12 or greater) are important sources of carbon and/or energy during both chronic and acute murine wound infection.
Ex vivo Tn-seq studies have provided insights into functions crucial for P. aeruginosa fitness in human blood and secretions. A Tn-seq screen conducted in human plasma examined how P. aeruginosa evades the complement system126. This study employed a gain-of-function approach in a clinical bloodstream isolate to identify mutants that were able to persist in plasma, surviving complement attack. They identified a novel three-gene operon (srgABC) that enhances serum resistance. In particular, the overexpression of srgA, encoding a small periplasmic protein, increased survival in plasma by up to 100-fold, making it a potent complement-evasion factor. Additionally, mutants with insertions in purine and biotin biosynthesis genes showed higher tolerance or persistence in plasma. This suggests that metabolic down-shifts (for example, purine auxotrophy or biotin limitation) might protect bacteria from complement, possibly by slowing growth or altering surface targets.
Ex vivo growth of P. aeruginosa Tn-seq libraries in mucus (sputum) from the cystic fibrosis lung revealed that no carbon catabolic pathways were critical for growth in this secretion, suggesting the existence of a number of carbon and energy sources in the lung with cystic fibrosis127. However, this study revealed that although sputum from patients with cystic fibrosis is an environment rich in carbon and amino acids, it is relatively poor in enzyme cofactors. As in murine wound infections, the biosynthesis of diaminopimelate, chorismate, purines, pantothenate, pyridoxal phosphate, polyamines and riboflavin is critical for P. aeruginosa fitness during ex vivo growth in sputum from individuals with cystic fibrosis. These data suggest that metabolic inhibitors developed to target P. aeruginosa cofactor biosynthesis, rather than carbon catabolic pathways, may be effective in treating P. aeruginosa chronic infections.
Epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance
P. aeruginosa is a resilient pathogen with a widespread presence in hospital environments2 (Fig. 1c), particularly in intensive care units, where it is a significant cause of nosocomial infections128. Its presence in health-care settings is often linked to contaminated moist environments and medical equipment, such as humidifiers, sinks, shower heads, ventilators and catheters2, which serve as potential sources of infection129–131. Cross-infection is frequently documented, with genotypically identical strains isolated from multiple patients132,133. Cross-transmission can be mediated by hospital personnel129,134, and possibly by arthropods such as cockroaches135. Moreover, P. aeruginosa infections in hospitals may also originate from patients who are pre-colonized with the bacterium, as intestinal carriage can lead to colonization of other body sites, especially in immunocompromised patients, potentially disseminating infection to others136.
Clinical and environmental isolates appear to be indistinguishable, with no strong correlation between specific clones and habitats. However, hospital transmission can increase the prevalence of adapted clones, many of which have high resistance to clinically relevant antibiotics. P. aeruginosa exhibits a non-clonal epidemic population structure, comprising a limited number of widely distributed clones that arise through selection from a background of relatively rare and unrelated genotypes, which often undergo recombination137,138. Notable sequence types (STs), classified based on multilocus sequence typing138, include widespread clones such as clone C (ST17) and PA14 (ST253), alongside epidemic clones associated with cystic fibrosis, such as the Liverpool Epidemic Strain (LES, ST146)139–143. Certain STs are globally disseminated and are frequently linked to outbreaks and have multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant phenotypes12. ‘High-risk’ clones13, such as ST235, ST111 and ST175 (refs. 144–146), are particularly concerning owing to their worldwide prevalence and the dissemination of resistance genes, including carbapenemases.
The antimicrobial resistance mechanisms of P. aeruginosa are multifaceted, encompassing intrinsic, adaptive and acquired forms139,147,148 (Fig. 3a). Intrinsic resistance in most strains arises from low outer membrane permeability, the production of enzymes that inactivate antimicrobials such as the AmpC β-lactamase, and antimicrobial efflux pumps139,147,149. Adaptive resistance is mediated by defined changes in the gene expression pattern of P. aeruginosa occurring in response to environmental cues or the presence of antibiotics. Acquired resistance is gained through horizontal gene transfer (HGT) or mutations that lead to enhanced efflux pump activity149, reduced antibiotic uptake, hyperproduction of β-lactamases and alterations to antibiotic targets139,147. Although mutations and HGT are considered the dominant drivers of resistance emergence within the host, recent investigations provided new insights into how antimicrobial resistance arises in individuals with P. aeruginosa infections150, also considering that multiple strains of P. aeruginosa can colonize the host at the same time148,150,151. Interestingly, research has shown that although de novo mutations occur at similar rates in both single-strain and mixed-strain populations, the incidence of acquiring new resistance genes through HGT is relatively low. In diverse P. aeruginosa populations, resistance evolves rapidly, primarily driven by natural selection for pre-existing resistant strains, emphasizing the link between resistance and pathogen diversity150. Furthermore, within mixed-strain populations, there are notable trade-offs between resistance and growth rate, suggesting that diversity can also lead to a loss of resistance when antibiotics are not present150,152. Metabolic and biophysical fitness trade-offs have also been investigated as P. aeruginosa forms biofilms under the pressures of mucosal growth and antibiotic treatment. These trade-offs probably promote phenotypic heterogeneity and flexibility, with antibiotic-resistant biofilms shielding less tolerant but more cytotoxic cells, enabling P. aeruginosa to persist through different stages of infection153.
In addition to conventional resistance mechanisms such as those observed in the ‘high-risk’ sequence types, P. aeruginosa can also display heteroresistance. Heteroresistance is a phenotype in which a bacterial strain contains subpopulations of cells with increased antibiotic resistance when compared with the susceptible main population154 (Fig. 3c). This subpopulation, often undetected by standard susceptibility testing methods, can survive antibiotic treatment, leading to treatment failure and chronic infections. Heteroresistance is highly unstable, and the surviving subpopulation often converts to susceptible after the removal of the antibiotic. The mechanisms controlling unstable heteroresistance in P. aeruginosa are varied and include overexpression of efflux pumps155–157, decreased levels of the OprD porin155,157 and increased expression of genes involved in DNA replication and repair158, among others. Heteroresistance is particularly concerning in P. aeruginosa owing to the large number of intrinsic resistance mechanisms and ability to adapt to chronic infection environments, such as within the lung with cystic fibrosis. The existence of heteroresistant subpopulations complicates clinical management, requiring more precise diagnostic methods and tailored treatment strategies to effectively eradicate the infection and prevent resistance development.
Treatment of P. aeruginosa infections
The treatment of P. aeruginosa infections can be extremely challenging due to its intrinsic resistance and in vivo tolerance to many antibiotics, unstable heteroresistance and its ability to acquire additional resistance mechanisms. The treatment approach depends on the type and severity of the infection, as well as the specific resistance profile of the strain. Antibiotic therapy remains the primary treatment strategy. Broad-spectrum antibiotics such as β-lactams (piperacillin–tazobactam, ceftazidime and cefepime) and carbapenems (imipenem and meropenem) are routinely used. Aminoglycosides such as gentamicin and tobramycin can also be effective and often used in combination with other antibiotics for enhanced efficacy. Fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) and polymyxins (colistin) are also part of the treatment toolkit, with colistin often used as a last-resort treatment for multidrug-resistant strains. Cefiderocol is a relatively new antibiotic that is effective against multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa strains159. It is a siderophore cephalosporin that utilizes iron uptake mechanisms to enter host cells. Surgical intervention for infections involving abscesses, prosthetic devices, severe tissue damage, surgical debridement or removal of infected devices may be necessary in addition to antibiotic therapy.
As antibiotic resistance continues to rise, the search for innovative alternatives to traditional treatments has become increasingly urgent. Among the most promising solutions is bacteriophage (phage) therapy160,161. Unlike antibiotics, phages are living viruses that evolve alongside bacteria, allowing them to adapt and remain effective even in the face of bacterial resistance. Their precision is a key advantage, as they can specifically target P. aeruginosa strains without harming beneficial microbiota. However, this specificity comes with challenges. Each infection often requires a personalized selection of phages, making large-scale application complex. Additionally, although phages can, at least in theory, outpace bacterial resistance, their success depends on rapid identification of effective phages and navigating regulatory hurdles. Antimicrobial peptides are another well-studied alternative. These small molecules, such as polymyxins, attack bacterial membranes and are effective against multidrug-resistant strains, including those protected by biofilms. However, their therapeutic potential is tempered by risks of toxicity to human cells and rapid degradation in the body, necessitating further refinement in their design and delivery.
Biofilms pose a critical challenge to most treatments. Biofilm-disrupting agents such as DNase enzymes aim to break down these barriers, allowing antibiotics to penetrate162. Although this approach shows promise, biofilms are complex structures that often require combination therapies for complete eradication. Another strategy involves depriving P. aeruginosa of essential nutrients, such as iron. Iron-sequestering therapies such as gallium nitrate mimic iron to disrupt bacterial metabolism, effectively starving the pathogen163. However, this approach risks unintended effects on host cells, raising safety concerns. Other strategies, such as monoclonal antibodies, have been developed to neutralize bacterial toxins such as exotoxin A117. Although highly specific and immune boosting, these therapies face challenges related to high costs and potential immune escape. Emerging technologies have introduced nanotechnology-based drug delivery, which targets pathogens more precisely, and quorum sensing inhibitors164, which disrupt bacterial communication to help prevent things such as biofilm formation. Finally, pyocins are protein-based bacteriocins produced naturally by P. aeruginosa165. These highly specific agents can target rival strains without damaging the microbiota. However, scaling up their production and precisely matching them to bacterial strains remains a challenge. Despite the obstacles, these alternative therapies offer hope for combating P. aeruginosa multidrug-resistant infections.
Conclusions and future questions
P. aeruginosa exemplifies bacterial adaptability and resilience, demonstrating a remarkable capacity to thrive across a spectrum of environments — from natural ecosystems to complex clinical settings. This versatility is fundamentally driven by the bacterium’s extensive genomic variability, metabolic flexibility and sophisticated array of virulence factors, which collectively enable it to establish both acute and chronic infections in humans. One of the key aspects of the pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa is its ability to form biofilms and engage in quorum sensing, which enhances its virulence and complicates treatment efforts. These characteristics contribute to its prominence as a leading nosocomial pathogen, often presenting challenges in infection control and management.
Despite substantial progress in understanding the biology and pathogenic mechanisms of P. aeruginosa, several critical questions remain unanswered. For instance, more research is needed to elucidate the epidemiological mechanisms that facilitate the spread and fitness of the most prevalent, antibiotic-resistant and virulent STs in clinical settings. Understanding the factors that drive the success of these strains, including genetic determinants, transmission dynamics and environmental influences, is crucial for developing targeted interventions and improving infection control measures. Although extensive research has been conducted using laboratory strains of P. aeruginosa, there is a pressing need to bridge the gap between these model systems and the behaviour of the bacterium in natural and clinical environments. Integrating our current knowledge with real-world scenarios will enhance our understanding of P. aeruginosa biology and inform strategies for prevention and treatment.
The role of quorum sensing circuits in both acute and chronic human infections requires deeper investigation. Detailed studies on how each quorum sensing circuit contributes to pathogenicity, including biofilm formation, virulence factor production and antibiotic resistance, will be critical in identifying potential therapeutic targets. Exploring ways to disrupt quorum sensing signalling could offer novel approaches for managing P. aeruginosa infections. In relation to biofilm formation, further exploration is needed to understand its contribution to antibiotic tolerance in both acute and chronic infections. Uncovering the mechanisms by which biofilms confer resistance and assessing the feasibility of biofilm dispersal as an antimicrobial strategy could provide new avenues for treatment.
Last, further investigation into single-cell heterogeneity in P. aeruginosa virulence and antibiotic tolerance is needed. The variability among individual cells within a population could influence the overall pathogenic potential and resistance profile of the bacterium. Understanding this heterogeneity could lead to more effective treatment strategies and enhance our ability to combat infections.
Overcoming these challenges requires a multifaceted approach, including the development of combination therapies that target biofilms, quorum sensing and antibiotic resistance mechanisms. Improved infection control, rapid diagnostics and personalized medicine will help mitigate transmission and resistance, optimizing patient outcomes.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Cystic Fibrosis foundation for grants (WHITEL20A0 and WHITEL22G0) to M.W. and a postdoctoral fellowship to M.L. (LETIZI24G0-BASBAUM); the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) for funding to S.P.D. (R01AI153116 and R56AI184449) and M.W. (R01AI189786).
Glossary
- Bet hedging
Stochastic switching between phenotypic states to enhance population long-term fitness in fluctuating environmental conditions
- Biogeography
The spatial assembly and distribution of various organisms in an environment through time
- Bridging aggregation
A mechanism of bacterial aggregation driven by electrostatic interactions between bacterial cell surfaces and polymers present in the environment
- Depletion aggregation
A process in which the reduction of free energy through increased entropy of the whole system induces the stacked aggregation of bacterial cells in polymer-rich environments
- Division of labour
Cooperating individuals specialize in carrying out specific tasks, providing an inclusive fitness benefit to all individuals involved
- Self-sensing
Cell-autonomous and density-independent reception of signals produced by the same cell
- Sociomicrobiology
Studies on the group behaviours of microorganisms
Footnotes
Competing interests
M.W. is the co-founder and CSO of SynthBiome, Inc. M.L. and S.P.D. declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Reviews Microbiology thanks Niels Hoiby, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
References
- 1.Gessard C Classics in infectious diseases. On the blue and green coloration that appears on bandages. By Carle Gessard (1850–1925). Rev. Infect. Dis 6, S775–S776 (1984). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Crone S et al. The environmental occurrence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. APMIS 128, 220–231 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; In this study, the authors reevaluate the ubiquitous presence of P. aeruginosa, which is generally rare in pristine environments but shows a higher prevalence in areas impacted by human activities.
- 3.Micek ST et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection: importance of appropriate initial antimicrobial treatment. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 49, 1306–1311 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Newman JN, Floyd RV & Fothergill JL Invasion and diversity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa urinary tract infections. J. Med. Microbiol 71, 001458 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gitter A, Mena KD, Mendez KS, Wu F & Gerba CP Eye infection risks from Pseudomonas aeruginosa via hand soap and eye drops. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 90, e0211923 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Turner KH, Everett J, Trivedi U, Rumbaugh KP & Whiteley M Requirements for Pseudomonas aeruginosa acute burn and chronic surgical wound infection. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004518 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rossi E et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa adaptation and evolution in patients with cystic fibrosis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 19, 331–342 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Martinez-Solano L, Macia MD, Fajardo A, Oliver A & Martinez JL Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin. Infect. Dis 47, 1526–1533 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fernandez-Barat L et al. Intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa with and without multidrug resistance. J. Infect 74, 142–152 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cao P et al. A Pseudomonas aeruginosa small RNA regulates chronic and acute infection. Nature 618, 358–364 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; In this study, the authors identify the oxygen-responsive small RNA SicX as the chronic-to-acute switch in P. aeruginosa during mammalian infection.
- 11.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States. CDC; https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/biggest-threats.html (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 12.Magiorakos AP et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect 18, 268–281 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Woodford N, Turton JF & Livermore DM Multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria: the role of high-risk clones in the dissemination of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev 35, 736–755 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stover CK et al. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature 406, 959–964 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Taylor PK, Van Kessel ATM, Colavita A, Hancock REW & Mah TF A novel small RNA is important for biofilm formation and pathogenicity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS ONE 12, e0182582 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gomez-Lozano M, Marvig RL, Molin S & Long KS Genome-wide identification of novel small RNAs in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ. Microbiol 14, 2006–2016 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wurtzel O et al. The single-nucleotide resolution transcriptome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa grown in body temperature. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002945 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Green SK, Schroth MN, Cho JJ, Kominos SK & Vitanza-jack VB Agricultural plants and soil as a reservoir for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Microbiol 28, 987–991 (1974). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Khan NH et al. Isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from open ocean and comparison with freshwater, clinical, and animal isolates. Microb. Ecol 53, 173–186 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Haritash AK & Kaushik CP Biodegradation aspects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): a review. J. Hazard. Mater 169, 1–15 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rybtke M, Hultqvist LD, Givskov M & Tolker-Nielsen T Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm infections: community structure, antimicrobial tolerance and immune response. J. Mol. Biol 427, 3628–3645 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Favero MS, Carson LA, Bond WW & Petersen NJ Pseudomonas aeruginosa: growth in distilled water from hospitals. Science 173, 836–838 (1971). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ringen LM & Drake CH A study of the incidence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from various natural sources. J. Bacteriol 64, 841–845 (1952). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Botzenhart K & Döring G in Pseudomonas aeruginosa as an Opportunistic Pathogen (eds Campa M, Bendinelli M & Friedman H) 1–18 (Springer, 1993). [Google Scholar]
- 25.Qin S et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pathogenesis, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, interaction with host, technology advances and emerging therapeutics. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther 7, 199 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Here, the authors present a comprehensive review of the virulence factors of P. aeruginosa.
- 26.Sikdar R & Elias MH Evidence for complex interplay between quorum sensing and antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol. Spectr 10, e0126922 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shrout JD et al. The impact of quorum sensing and swarming motility on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation is nutritionally conditional. Mol. Microbiol 62, 1264–1277 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.West SA, Winzer K, Gardner A & Diggle SP Quorum sensing and the confusion about diffusion. Trends Microbiol. 20, 586–594 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Whiteley M, Diggle SP & Greenberg EP Progress in and promise of bacterial quorum sensing research. Nature 551, 313–320 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wagner VE, Bushnell D, Passador L, Brooks AI & Iglewski BH Microarray analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing regulons: effects of growth phase and environment. J. Bacteriol 185, 2080–2095 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Whiteley M, Lee KM & Greenberg EP Identification of genes controlled by quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 13904–13909 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schuster M, Lostroh CP, Ogi T & Greenberg EP Identification, timing, and signal specificity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-controlled genes: a transcriptome analysis. J. Bacteriol 185, 2066–2079 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Letizia M et al. PqsE expands and differentially modulates the RhlR quorum sensing regulon in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol. Spectr 10, e0096122 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rampioni G et al. Unravelling the genome-wide contributions of specific 2-alkyl-4-quinolones and PqsE to quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog. 12, e1006029 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schuster M & Greenberg EP A network of networks: quorum-sensing gene regulation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int. J. Med. Microbiol 296, 73–81 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Borgert SR et al. Moonlighting chaperone activity of the enzyme PqsE contributes to RhlR-controlled virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nat. Commun 13, 7402 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Taylor IR et al. Inhibitor mimetic mutations in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa PqsE enzyme reveal a protein–protein interaction with the quorum-sensing receptor RhlR that is vital for virulence factor production. ACS Chem. Biol 16, 740–752 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pearson JP, Feldman M, Iglewski BH & Prince A Pseudomonas aeruginosa cell-to-cell signaling is required for virulence in a model of acute pulmonary infection. Infect. Immun 68, 4331–4334 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rumbaugh KP, Griswold JA, Iglewski BH & Hamood AN Contribution of quorum sensing to the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in burn wound infections. Infect. Immun 67, 5854–5862 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rampioni G et al. Transcriptomic analysis reveals a global alkyl-quinolone-independent regulatory role for PqsE in facilitating the environmental adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to plant and animal hosts. Environ. Microbiol 12, 1659–1673 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Latifi A, Foglino M, Tanaka K, Williams P & Lazdunski A A hierarchical quorum-sensing cascade in Pseudomonas aeruginosa links the transcriptional activators LasR and RhIR (VsmR) to expression of the stationary-phase sigma factor RpoS. Mol. Microbiol 21, 1137–1146 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.McGrath S, Wade DS & Pesci EC Dueling quorum sensing systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa control the production of the Pseudomonas quinolone signal (PQS). FEMS Microbiol. Lett 230, 27–34 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wade DS et al. Regulation of Pseudomonas quinolone signal synthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol 187, 4372–4380 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.McKnight SL, Iglewski BH & Pesci EC The Pseudomonas quinolone signal regulates rhl quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol 182, 2702–2708 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Feltner JB et al. LasR variant cystic fibrosis isolates reveal an adaptable quorum-sensing hierarchy in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mBio 7, e01513–e01516 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kostylev M et al. Evolution of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing hierarchy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7027–7032 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cruz RL et al. RhlR-regulated acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing in a cystic fibrosis isolate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mBio 11, e00532–20 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dekimpe V & Deziel E Revisiting the quorum-sensing hierarchy in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: the transcriptional regulator RhlR regulates LasR-specific factors. Microbiology 155, 712–723 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Oshri RD, Zrihen KS, Shner I, Omer Bendori S & Eldar A Selection for increased quorum-sensing cooperation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa through the shut-down of a drug resistance pump. ISME J. 12, 2458–2469 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.O’Loughlin CT et al. A quorum-sensing inhibitor blocks Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence and biofilm formation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17981–17986 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.O’Connor K, Zhao CY, Mei M & Diggle SP Frequency of quorum-sensing mutations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from different environments. Microbiology 168, 001265 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Trottier MC et al. The end of the reign of a “master regulator”? A defect in function of the LasR quorum sensing regulator is a common feature of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. mBio 15, e0237623 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Groleau MC, Taillefer H, Vincent AT, Constant P & Deziel E Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates defective in function of the LasR quorum sensing regulator are frequent in diverse environmental niches. Environ. Microbiol 24, 1062–1075 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Vanderwoude J et al. The evolution of virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa during chronic wound infection. Proc. Biol. Sci 287, 20202272 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Azimi S, Klementiev AD, Whiteley M & Diggle SP Bacterial quorum sensing during infection. Annu. Rev. Microbiol 74, 201–219 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Diggle SP, Griffin AS, Campbell GS & West SA Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Nature 450, 411–414 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study experimentally demonstrates that quorum sensing in P. aeruginosa can be exploited by non-cooperative individuals, with kin selection mitigating this issue.
- 57.Zhao K et al. Evolution of lasR mutants in polymorphic Pseudomonas aeruginosa populations facilitates chronic infection of the lung. Nat. Commun 14, 5976 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sandoz KM, Mitzimberg SM & Schuster M Social cheating in Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15876–15881 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rumbaugh KP et al. Quorum sensing and the social evolution of bacterial virulence. Curr. Biol 19, 341–345 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.D’Argenio DA et al. Growth phenotypes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lasR mutants adapted to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Mol. Microbiol 64, 512–533 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hoffman LR et al. Nutrient availability as a mechanism for selection of antibiotic tolerant Pseudomonas aeruginosa within the CF airway. PLoS Pathog. 6, e1000712 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Barth AL & Pitt TL The high amino-acid content of sputum from cystic fibrosis patients promotes growth of auxotrophic Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Med. Microbiol 45, 110–119 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Clay ME et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa lasR mutant fitness in microoxia is supported by an Anr-regulated oxygen-binding hemerythrin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 3167–3173 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Azimi S et al. Allelic polymorphism shapes community function in evolving Pseudomonas aeruginosa populations. ISME J. 14, 1929–1942 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hoffman LR et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa lasR mutants are associated with cystic fibrosis lung disease progression. J. Cyst. Fibros 8, 66–70 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chugani SA et al. QscR, a modulator of quorum-sensing signal synthesis and virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 2752–2757 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ding F et al. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa orphan quorum sensing signal receptor QscR regulates global quorum sensing gene expression by activating a single linked operon. mBio 10.1128/mBio.01274-18 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Smith P & Schuster M Antiactivators prevent self-sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2201242119 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Rattray JB et al. Bacterial quorum sensing allows graded and bimodal cellular responses to variations in population density. mBio 13, e0074522 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Mellini M et al. RsaL-driven negative regulation promotes heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing. mBio 14, e0203923 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bondi R et al. The multi-output incoherent feedforward loop constituted by the transcriptional regulators LasR and RsaL confers robustness to a subset of quorum sensing genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Biosyst 13, 1080–1089 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ackermann M A functional perspective on phenotypic heterogeneity in microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 13, 497–508 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sindeldecker D & Stoodley P The many antibiotic resistance and tolerance strategies of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biofilm 3, 100056 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ciofu O, Moser C, Jensen PO & Hoiby N Tolerance and resistance of microbial biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 20, 621–635 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Franklin MJ, Nivens DE, Weadge JT & Howell PL Biosynthesis of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa extracellular polysaccharides, alginate, Pel, and Psl. Front. Microbiol 2, 167 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Colvin KM et al. The Pel and Psl polysaccharides provide Pseudomonas aeruginosa structural redundancy within the biofilm matrix. Environ. Microbiol 14, 1913–1928 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Martin DW et al. Mechanism of conversion to mucoidy in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infecting cystic fibrosis patients. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 8377–8381 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Hentzer M et al. Alginate overproduction affects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm structure and function. J. Bacteriol 183, 5395–5401 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Colvin KM et al. The Pel polysaccharide can serve a structural and protective role in the biofilm matrix of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1001264 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Le Mauff F et al. The Pel polysaccharide is predominantly composed of a dimeric repeat of alpha-1,4 linked galactosamine and N-acetylgalactosamine. Commun. Biol 5, 502 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Murakami K et al. Role of psl genes in antibiotic tolerance of adherent Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 61, e02587–16 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Jennings LK et al. Pel is a cationic exopolysaccharide that cross-links extracellular DNA in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm matrix. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11353–11358 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Wang S et al. The exopolysaccharide Psl–eDNA interaction enables the formation of a biofilm skeleton in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ. Microbiol. Rep 7, 330–340 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Whitchurch CB, Tolker-Nielsen T, Ragas PC & Mattick JS Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation. Science 295, 1487 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Turnbull L et al. Explosive cell lysis as a mechanism for the biogenesis of bacterial membrane vesicles and biofilms. Nat. Commun 7, 11220 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Nazeer RR, Wang M & Welch M More than just a gel: the extracellular matrixome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Mol. Biosci 10, 1307857 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Couto N, Schooling SR, Dutcher JR & Barber J Proteome profiles of outer membrane vesicles and extracellular matrix of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. J. Proteome Res 14, 4207–4222 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Diggle SP et al. The galactophilic lectin, LecA, contributes to biofilm development in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ. Microbiol 8, 1095–1104 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Passos da Silva D et al. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa lectin LecB binds to the exopolysaccharide Psl and stabilizes the biofilm matrix. Nat. Commun 10, 2183 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Reichhardt C The Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm matrix protein CdrA has similarities to other fibrillar adhesin proteins. J. Bacteriol 205, e0001923 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Ha DG & O’Toole GA c-di-GMP and its effects on biofilm formation and dispersion: a Pseudomonas aeruginosa review. Microbiol. Spectr 3, MB-0003–MB-2014 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Zheng X et al. The surface interface and swimming motility influence surface-sensing responses in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2411981121 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Rumbaugh KP & Bjarnsholt T Microbial primer: in vivo biofilm. Microbiology 169, 001407 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Bjarnsholt T et al. The in vivo biofilm. Trends Microbiol. 21, 466–474 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Klausen M, Aaes-Jorgensen A, Molin S & Tolker-Nielsen T Involvement of bacterial migration in the development of complex multicellular structures in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Mol. Microbiol 50, 61–68 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Nickel JC, Downey JA & Costerton JW Ultrastructural study of microbiologic colonization of urinary catheters. Urology 34, 284–291 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Costerton JW et al. New methods for the detection of orthopedic and other biofilm infections. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol 61, 133–140 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Azimi S et al. O-specific antigen-dependent surface hydrophobicity mediates aggregate assembly type in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mBio 12, e0086021 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Secor PR, Michaels LA, Bublitz DC, Jennings LK & Singh PK The depletion mechanism actuates bacterial aggregation by exopolysaccharides and determines species distribution and composition in bacterial aggregates. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol 12, 869736 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Secor PR, Michaels LA, Ratjen A, Jennings LK & Singh PK Entropically driven aggregation of bacteria by host polymers promotes antibiotic tolerance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 10780–10785 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Bjarnsholt T et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in the respiratory tract of cystic fibrosis patients. Pediatr. Pulmonol 44, 547–558 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Homøe P, Bjarnsholt T, Wessman M, Sørensen HC & Johansen HK Morphological evidence of biofilm formation in Greenlanders with chronic suppurative otitis media. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol 266, 1533–1538 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Kirketerp-Moller K et al. Distribution, organization, and ecology of bacteria in chronic wounds. J. Clin. Microbiol 46, 2717–2722 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Kragh KN, Tolker-Nielsen T & Lichtenberg M The non-attached biofilm aggregate. Commun. Biol 6, 898 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Kolpen M et al. Bacterial biofilms predominate in both acute and chronic human lung infections. Thorax 77, 1015–1022 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Jennings LK et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa aggregates in cystic fibrosis sputum produce exopolysaccharides that likely impede current therapies. Cell Rep. 34, 108782 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study demonstrates that the morphology of P. aeruginosa biofilm aggregate in cystic fibrosis sputum is consistent with a polysaccharide-dependent aggregation mechanism.
- 107.Rossy T et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa type IV pili actively induce mucus contraction to form biofilms in tissue-engineered human airways. PLoS Biol. 21, e3002209 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Rumbaugh KP & Whiteley M Towards improved biofilm models. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 10.1038/s41579-024-01086-2 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Liao C, Huang X, Wang Q, Yao D & Lu W Virulence factors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and antivirulence strategies to combat its drug resistance. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol 12, 926758 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Hauser AR The type III secretion system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: infection by injection. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 7, 654–665 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Yahr TL, Goranson J & Frank DW Exoenzyme S of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is secreted by a type III pathway. Mol. Microbiol 22, 991–1003 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Liu PV The roles of various fractions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in its pathogenesis. 3 Identity of the lethal toxins produced in vitro and in vivo. J. Infect. Dis 116, 481–489 (1966). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Michalska M & Wolf P Pseudomonas exotoxin A: optimized by evolution for effective killing. Front. Microbiol 6, 963 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Armstrong S, Yates SP & Merrill AR Insight into the catalytic mechanism of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A. Studies of toxin interaction with eukaryotic elongation factor-2. J. Biol. Chem 277, 46669–46675 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Jorgensen R et al. Exotoxin A–eEF2 complex structure indicates ADP ribosylation by ribosome mimicry. Nature 436, 979–984 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Ochsner UA, Johnson Z, Lamont IL, Cunliffe HE & Vasil ML Exotoxin A production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa requires the iron-regulated pvdS gene encoding an alternative sigma factor. Mol. Microbiol 21, 1019–1028 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Farajnia S et al. Protective efficacy of recombinant exotoxin A-flagellin fusion protein against Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Can. J. Microbiol 61, 60–64 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Galdino ACM, Branquinha MH, Santos ALS & Viganor L in Pathophysiological Aspects of Proteases (eds Chakraborti S & Dhalla NS) 381–397 (Springer, 2017). [Google Scholar]
- 119.Soberon-Chavez G, Lepine F & Deziel E Production of rhamnolipids by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 68, 718–725 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Hall S et al. Cellular effects of pyocyanin, a secreted virulence factor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Toxins 8, 236 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Allen L et al. Pyocyanin production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa induces neutrophil apoptosis and impairs neutrophil-mediated host defenses in vivo. J. Immunol 174, 3643–3649 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Gallagher LA & Manoil C Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 kills Caenorhabditis elegans by cyanide poisoning. J. Bacteriol 183, 6207–6214 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Zuhra K & Szabo C The two faces of cyanide: an environmental toxin and a potential novel mammalian gasotransmitter. FEBS J. 289, 2481–2515 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Cornelis P & Dingemans J Pseudomonas aeruginosa adapts its iron uptake strategies in function of the type of infections. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol 3, 75 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Lamont IL, Beare PA, Ochsner U, Vasil AI & Vasil ML Siderophore-mediated signaling regulates virulence factor production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7072–7077 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Janet-Maitre M et al. Genome-wide screen in human plasma identifies multifaceted complement evasion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog. 19, e1011023 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This genome-wide screen in human plasma identifies novel factors that contribute to P. aeruginosa’s multifaceted evasion of complement-mediated killing.
- 127.Turner KH, Wessel AK, Palmer GC, Murray JL & Whiteley M Essential genome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis sputum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4110–4115 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Vincent JL et al. Prevalence and outcomes of infection among patients in intensive care units in 2017. JAMA 323, 1478–1487 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Pham TM et al. Routes of transmission of VIM-positive Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the adult intensive care unit — analysis of 9 years of surveillance at a university hospital using a mathematical model. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 11, 55 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Garvey MI, Bradley CW, Tracey J & Oppenheim B Continued transmission of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from a wash hand basin tap in a critical care unit. J. Hosp. Infect 94, 8–12 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Costa D et al. Nosocomial outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa associated with a drinking water fountain. J. Hosp. Infect 91, 271–274 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Jones AM et al. Spread of a multiresistant strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an adult cystic fibrosis clinic. Lancet 358, 557–558 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Milczewska J et al. Clinical outcomes for cystic fibrosis patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa cross-infections. Pediatr. Pulmonol 55, 161–168 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Doring G et al. Generation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa aerosols during handwashing from contaminated sink drains, transmission to hands of hospital personnel, and its prevention by use of a new heating device. Zentralbl. Hyg. Umweltmed 191, 494–505 (1991). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Saitou K, Furuhata K, Kawakami Y & Fukuyama M Biofilm formation abilities and disinfectant-resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from cockroaches captured in hospitals. Biocontrol Sci. 14, 65–68 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Okuda J et al. Translocation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from the intestinal tract is mediated by the binding of ExoS to an Na,K-ATPase regulator, FXYD3. Infect. Immun 78, 4511–4522 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Pirnay JP et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa population structure revisited. PLoS ONE 4, e7740 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Curran B, Jonas D, Grundmann H, Pitt T & Dowson CG Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Clin. Microbiol 42, 5644–5649 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Botelho J, Grosso F & Peixe L Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa — mechanisms, epidemiology and evolution. Drug Resist. Updat 44, 100640 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Oliver A, Mulet X, Lopez-Causape C & Juan C The increasing threat of Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones. Drug Resist. Updat 21-22, 41–59 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Winstanley C et al. Newly introduced genomic prophage islands are critical determinants of in vivo competitiveness in the liverpool epidemic strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Genome Res. 19, 12–23 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Lee C et al. Why? — Successful Pseudomonas aeruginosa clones with a focus on clone C. FEMS Microbiol. Rev 44, 740–762 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Fischer S, Dethlefsen S, Klockgether J & Tummler B Phenotypic and genomic comparison of the two most common ExoU-positive Pseudomonas aeruginosa clones, PA14 and ST235. mSystems 5, e01007–e01020 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Treepong P et al. Global emergence of the widespread Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST235 clone. Clin. Microbiol. Infect 24, 258–266 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Del Barrio-Tofino E, Lopez-Causape C & Oliver A Pseudomonas aeruginosa epidemic high-risk clones and their association with horizontally-acquired β-lactamases: 2020 update. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 56, 106196 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Viedma E et al. VIM-2-producing multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST175 clone, Spain. Emerg. Infect. Dis 18, 1235–1241 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Breidenstein EB, de la Fuente-Nunez C & Hancock RE Pseudomonas aeruginosa: all roads lead to resistance. Trends Microbiol. 19, 419–426 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Shepherd MJ et al. Ecological and evolutionary mechanisms driving within-patient emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 10.1038/s41579-024-01041-1 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Lorusso AB, Carrara JA, Barroso CDN, Tuon FF & Faoro H Role of efflux pumps on antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int. J. Mol. Sci 23, 15779 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Diaz Caballero J et al. Mixed strain pathogen populations accelerate the evolution of antibiotic resistance in patients. Nat. Commun 14, 4083 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Williams D et al. Divergent, coexisting Pseudomonas aeruginosa lineages in chronic cystic fibrosis lung infections. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med 191, 775–785 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Wheatley R et al. Rapid evolution and host immunity drive the rise and fall of carbapenem resistance during an acute Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Nat. Commun 12, 2460 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Meirelles LA et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa faces a fitness trade-off between mucosal colonization and antibiotic tolerance during airway infection. Nat. Microbiol 9, 3284–3303 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Andersson DI, Nicoloff H & Hjort K Mechanisms and clinical relevance of bacterial heteroresistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 17, 479–496 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Ikonomidis A et al. Efflux system overexpression and decreased OprD contribute to the carbapenem heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 279, 36–39 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Mei S, Gao Y, Zhu C, Dong C & Chen Y Research of the heteroresistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to imipenem. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med 8, 6129–6132 (2015). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Xu Y et al. Mechanisms of heteroresistance and resistance to imipenem in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Drug Resist 13, 1419–1428 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Li WR et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa heteroresistance to levofloxacin caused by upregulated expression of essential genes for DNA replication and repair. Front. Microbiol 13, 1105921 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Brauncajs M, Bielec F, Macieja A & Pastuszak-Lewandoska D Cefiderocol — an effective antimicrobial for MDR infections but a challenge for routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Adv. Med. Sci 69, 256–263 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Hahn A et al. Bacteriophage therapy for pan-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in two persons with cystic fibrosis. J. Investig. Med. High Impact Case Rep 11, 23247096231188243 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Jault P et al. Efficacy and tolerability of a cocktail of bacteriophages to treat burn wounds infected by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PhagoBurn): a randomised, controlled, double-blind phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Infect. Dis 19, 35–45 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Rumbaugh KP & Sauer K Biofilm dispersion. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 18, 571–586 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Rezzoagli C, Archetti M, Mignot I, Baumgartner M & Kummerli R Combining antibiotics with antivirulence compounds can have synergistic effects and reverse selection for antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000805 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Allen RC, Popat R, Diggle SP & Brown SP Targeting virulence: can we make evolution-proof drugs? Nat. Rev. Microbiol 12, 300–308 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Mei M, Estrada I, Diggle SP & Goldberg JB R-pyocins as targeted antimicrobials against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. npj Antimicrob. Resist 3, 17 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Lee DG et al. Genomic analysis reveals that Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence is combinatorial. Genome Biol. 7, R90 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Freschi L et al. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa pan-genome provides new insights on its population structure, horizontal gene transfer, and pathogenicity. Genome Biol. Evol 11, 109–120 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Rudra B, Duncan L, Shah AJ, Shah HN & Gupta RS Phylogenomic and comparative genomic studies robustly demarcate two distinct clades of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains: proposal to transfer the strains from an outlier clade to a novel species Pseudomonas paraeruginosa sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol 10.1099/ijsem.0.005542 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Abram KZ, Jun SR & Udaondo Z Pseudomonas aeruginosa pangenome: core and accessory genes of a highly resourceful opportunistic pathogen. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol 1386, 3–28 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Kung VL, Ozer EA & Hauser AR The accessory genome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev 74, 621–641 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Darch SE et al. Recombination is a key driver of genomic and phenotypic diversity in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa population during cystic fibrosis infection. Sci. Rep 5, 7649 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Jorth P et al. Regional isolation drives bacterial diversification within cystic fibrosis lungs. Cell Host Microbe 18, 307–319 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Vanderwoude J, Azimi S, Read TD & Diggle SP The role of hypermutation and collateral sensitivity in antimicrobial resistance diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa populations in cystic fibrosis lung infection. mBio 15, e0310923 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Whiteley M et al. Gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nature 413, 860–864 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Palmer KL, Aye LM & Whiteley M Nutritional cues control Pseudomonas aeruginosa multicellular behavior in cystic fibrosis sputum. J. Bacteriol 189, 8079–8087 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Arai H Regulation and function of versatile aerobic and anaerobic respiratory metabolism in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol 2, 103 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Palmer GC & Whiteley M Metabolism and pathogenicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the lungs of individuals with cystic fibrosis. Microbiol. Spectr 10.1128/microbiolspec.MBP-0003-2014 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Sauvage S et al. Impact of carbon source supplementations on Pseudomonas aeruginosa physiology. J. Proteome Res 21, 1392–1407 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Cox CD & Parker J Use of 2-aminoacetophenone production in identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Clin. Microbiol 9, 479–484 (1979). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Dunphy LJ et al. Multidimensional clinical surveillance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa reveals complex relationships between isolate source, morphology, and antimicrobial resistance. mSphere 6, e0039321 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.da Cruz Nizer WS et al. Oxidative stress response in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Pathogens 10, 1187 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Neves PR, McCulloch JA, Mamizuka EM & Lincopan N in Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology 2nd edn (eds Batt CA & Tortorello ML) 253–260 (Academic Press, 2014). [Google Scholar]
- 183.Visca P, Imperi F & Lamont IL Pyoverdine siderophores: from biogenesis to biosignificance. Trends Microbiol. 15, 22–30 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Lau GW, Hassett DJ, Ran H & Kong F The role of pyocyanin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Trends Mol. Med 10, 599–606 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Ogunnariwo J & Hamilton-Miller JM Brown- and red-pigmented Pseudomonas aeruginosa: differentiation between melanin and pyorubrin. J. Med. Microbiol 8, 199–203 (1975). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Michel-Briand Y & Baysse C The pyocins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochimie 84, 499–510 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Besse A, Groleau MC & Deziel E Emergence of small colony variants is an adaptive strategy used by Pseudomonas aeruginosa to mitigate the effects of redox imbalance. mSphere 8, e0005723 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Dietrich LE et al. Bacterial community morphogenesis is intimately linked to the intracellular redox state. J. Bacteriol 195, 1371–1380 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Giallonardi G et al. Alkyl-quinolone-dependent quorum sensing controls prophage-mediated autolysis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa colony biofilms. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol 13, 1183681 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Rashid MH & Kornberg A Inorganic polyphosphate is needed for swimming, swarming, and twitching motilities of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4885–4890 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Craig L, Forest KT & Maier B Type IV pili: dynamics, biophysics and functional consequences. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 17, 429–440 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Holloway BW Genetic recombination in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Gen. Microbiol 13, 572–581 (1955). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Rahme LG et al. Common virulence factors for bacterial pathogenicity in plants and animals. Science 268, 1899–1902 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Parsek MR & Greenberg EP Sociomicrobiology: the connections between quorum sensing and biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 13, 27–33 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Cornforth DM, Diggle FL, Melvin JA, Bomberger JM & Whiteley M Quantitative framework for model evaluation in microbiology research using Pseudomonas aeruginosa and cystic fibrosis infection as a test case. mBio 11, e03042–19 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; In this study, the authors provide a framework for quantifying the accuracy of preclinical models relative to human infections.
- 196.Lewin GR et al. Application of a quantitative framework to improve the accuracy of a bacterial infection model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2221542120 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Guan J et al. Bacteriophage genome engineering with CRISPR–Cas13a. Nat. Microbiol 7 1956–1966 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study develops a genetic editing tool using RNA-targeting CRISPR–Cas13a and P. aeruginosa to manipulate jumbo phages, overcoming challenges posed by their protective phage nucleus.
- 198.Lewin GR, Stocke KS, Lamont RJ & Whiteley M A quantitative framework reveals traditional laboratory growth is a highly accurate model of human oral infection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2116637119 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Duncan RP et al. Improvement of a mouse infection model to capture Pseudomonas aeruginosa chronic physiology in cystic fibrosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2406234121 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Chaikeeratisak V et al. Assembly of a nucleus-like structure during viral replication in bacteria. Science 355, 194–197 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
