Skip to main content
Sage Choice logoLink to Sage Choice
. 2026 Jan 28;110(2):705–715. doi: 10.1177/13872877261416086

Treating hippocampal neural stem cells with nano-pulsed laser therapy generates neurons resilient against amyloid-β oligomer toxicity

Kevin Johnson 1, Auston Grant 1, Shrinath Kadamangudi 2, Armando Arizpe 1, Kathia Johnson 1, Rinat Esenaliev 3, Giulio Taglialatela 2,4, Maria-Adelaide Micci 1,4,✉
PMCID: PMC13066474  PMID: 41603339

Abstract

Background

Hippocampal synaptic dysfunction driven by toxic amyloid-β oligomers (AβO) is an early event in the progression of neurodegeneration and cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Non-invasive photobiomodulation therapy (PBM) is a promising intervention that has been shown to reduce amyloid and tau pathology, improve synaptic function, and preserve hippocampal neurogenesis in animal models of AD. Nano-pulsed laser therapy (NPLT) is a type of PBM therapy using pulsed 808 nm near-infrared laser light and optoacoustically generated ultrasound waves to stimulate deeper brain structures than would be accessible by traditional PBM therapy. We hypothesize that NPLT can effectively modulate hippocampal neurogenesis to induce resilience against AD.

Objective

To assess resilience of hippocampal neurons derived from NPLT-treated neural stem cells (NSC) against AβO toxicity.

Methods

We use NPLT to stimulate adult hippocampal neural stem cells (NSC) then induce neuronal differentiation in vitro and assess the mature neurons for AβO binding capacity and mitochondrial toxicity, and gene expression changes after NPLT.

Results

We found that neurons differentiated from NPLT-treated NSC are resilient against AβO binding and mitochondrial toxicity, and show increased expression of genes associated with autophagy and proteostasis.

Conclusions

Our findings support the hypothesis that NPLT modulation of hippocampal neurogenesis can be an effective non-invasive approach to induce resilience against AD toxic oligomers.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-β, low-level laser therapy, neural stem cells, neurogenesis

Introduction

Neurodegenerative diseases are among the most financially and emotionally taxing conditions in the modern world. Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common form of dementia, is the 7th leading cause of death in the United States and the only one of the top ten to have increased more than 140% in the last twenty years. 1 This dramatic increase in mortality indicates the lack of significant progress in therapeutic development despite advances in our broader understanding of the disease. One of the many criticisms of the past decades of AD research is the hyper-focused approach of eliminating the hallmark pathological protein aggregates, amyloid-β plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles, to try to cure the disease. The recent reports from the Donanemab and Lecanemab monoclonal anti-amyloid antibody trials suggest that this approach could be effective for slowing the progression of dementia symptoms especially if implemented early but also made clear that this approach alone would not be sufficient to reverse or cure the disease.2,3 It has been well documented that the insidious onset of AD pathology occurs for decades prior to the emergence of clinical symptoms4,5 at which point cortical and hippocampal atrophy have crossed the threshold of cognitive reserve in the affected individual. For this reason, it is critical to investigate alternative therapeutic interventions that can address cellular processes that have long since broken down by the time dementia symptoms emerge. Harnessing the therapeutic potential of adult hippocampal neurogenesis is one possible strategy to address the underlying pathology of AD and help restore cognitive function in those afflicted by the disease.

For nearly a century neuroscience was dominated by a central dogma that in the adult brain, neurons and the networks they compose were fixed, immutable, and incapable of regeneration.6,7 In the 1960s Joseph Altman discovered DNA synthesis, thus, cell division, occurring in the hippocampal dentate gyrus of adult rats;8,9 however, it was another decade later that Kaplan and colleagues confirmed the newly divided cells were in fact neurons. 10 Despite these discoveries, adult neurogenesis and its proponents were largely written off as quacks until the 1990s, when neural stem cells were isolated from mammalian brains and demonstrated proliferation and multipotency to differentiate into neuronal and glial cell types in vitro.11,12 Today, adult hippocampal neurogenesis (AHN) is a widely accepted phenomenon and its implications in aging, learning, and memory are actively under investigation.

Studies have shown that normal aging slows hippocampal neurogenesis, which is in part due to age-related metabolic decline,13–16 and this process is significantly accelerated in the presence of AD neuropathology, leading to depletion of both neural stem cells (NSC) and newborn neurons.17–19 Photobiomodulation (PBM) using red to near-infrared light is an accessible, non-invasive therapy known to reduce inflammation and regulate cell metabolism via stimulation of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase (CCO).20–25 In human clinical trials, transcranial PBM has shown therapeutic benefits for AD, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and mood disorders.26–30 In addition to its metabolic and anti-inflammatory effects, PBM improved hippocampal neurogenesis in animal models of AD, TBI, and stroke31–35

The efficacy of PBM is dependent on three principal variables: wavelength of light, fluence or energy density of the treatment, and whether it is delivered as continuous or pulsed wave. Red light in the 650–700 nm wavelength range, and near-infrared light (NIR) at 800–850 nm align with the peak absorption values of CCO and are the most commonly used wavelengths in PBM therapy.22,31,36 Unlike visible red light, which is largely reflected and scattered by the surface of the skin, the longer wavelength NIR penetrates much deeper through skin, enhancing therapeutic benefits to underlying tissues.37,38 Fluence, or energy density, is used to calculate the “dose” of PBM therapy delivered and is typically measured in J/cm2. Because mitochondrial respiration generates oxygen free radicals (ROS), important signaling molecules in low concentrations, but cytotoxic at high concentrations, there is an optimal therapeutic window above which the therapeutic benefits can be lost and potential negative effects introduced. 39 Finally, delivery of PBM as continuous or pulsed wave light can have differential effects, as pulsed wave light has a built in cool down period during the light “off” cycle it allows for delivery of a higher power, thus higher energy at greater tissue depth, without the detrimental tissue heating effects found with continuous wave delivery of the same power.40,41

We proposed nano-pulsed laser therapy (NPLT) utilizing short (nanosecond) light pulses to generate optoacoustic waves in tissues and demonstrated therapeutic effects of NPLT in animal models of TBI.42,43 In this study, we used NPLT to treat adult hippocampal neural stem cells in vitro and induced their differentiation into mature neurons. We found that these neurons retain a resilient phenotype against amyloid-β oligomers long after NPLT treatment, and exhibit enhanced protein synthesis and autophagy-related gene expression. These results suggest that photobiomodulation of NSC in the hippocampal neurogenic niche can produce new neurons resilient to proteotoxic stress in AD and other neurodegenerative disorders.

Methods

Neural stem cell culture and mature neuron differentiation

Adult female rat hippocampal neural stem cells (NSC; Millipore) were cultured as neurospheres according to the supplier's protocol. Briefly, cells were grown in NSC expansion media composed of 50:50 Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM)/F12 supplemented with 2% B-27, 20 ng/mL FGF, and 1% antimycotic/antibiotic. For experimentation on mature neurons, cells were differentiated according to the same supplier's protocol. NSC were seeded on laminin-coated 8-well chamber slides or 6-well plates for 24 h in NSC expansion media to allow for attachment, then switched to neuronal differentiation media containing 50:50 DMEM/F12, 2% B-27 supplement, 1% antimycotic/antibiotic, 1 μM retinoic acid, and 5 μM Forskolin for five days, changing media every other day. This protocol results in a differentiated population of approximately 70% mature neurons (MN), and 30% glia or undifferentiated stem cells. For quality control, NSC and differentiatied cells are checked via western blot and immunocytochemistry for the stemness markers SOX2 or Nestin, MN marker βIII-tubulin, and the astroglial marker GFAP (Supplemental Figure 1).

In vitro NPLT treatment

NSC were dissociated using Accutase (Millipore-Sigma) for accurate counting, and 600,000 NSC were added to a single well of a 96-well plate. To simulate optoacoustic ultrasound generation that occurs by thermoelastic expansion of tissue during NPLT treatment, 44 a photoabsorbent black membrane was adhered to the base of the well using ultrasound gel. The purpose of the membrane is to completely absorb light energy and reflect only optoacoustic ultrasound waves back into the well. Cells were placed beneath the 3 mm diameter laser probe with approximately 14 mm from the tip of the probe to the bottom of the well, resulting in a laser spot of 0.11 cm2 and treated for approximately 5 min with 808 nm NPLT (20 Hz, ∼5 mJ/pulse, 10 ns pulse width) for a total dose of ∼300 J/cm2 (Figure 1). Sham-treated NSC were plated in the same density for the same duration but not exposed to the NPLT device. Immediately following NPLT or Sham treatment, NSC were seeded on laminin-coated chamber slides or plates for differentiation.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Experimental design. Schematic showing NPLT treatment of hippocampal NSC followed by 2.5 μM Aβ oligomer exposure.

Amyloid-β oligomer preparation

Synthetic monomeric Aβ1–42 peptide was purchased from AnaSpec (cat# AS-GMP-20276-1; Fremont, CA). Aβ oligomer (AβO) preparation was performed as previously described.45–47 Briefly, 0.3 mg of lyophilized Aβ peptide was dissolved in 200 µl of 1,1,1,33,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFP) and incubated at room temperature for 10–20 min followed by dilution with 700 µl of ultrapure water, and the mixture was magnetically stirred in a fume hood for 48 h at room temperature (RT). To facilitate the evaporation of HFP, a cap with four holes was placed on the tube for the duration of stirring. The resulting AβO were aliquoted, frozen at −80°C, and used within 3 months of preparation. For immunofluorescence analysis of AβO binding to cultured neurons, the HFP-Aβ peptide solution was spiked with HyLite Fluor 647-tagged monomeric Aβ (cat# AS-64161; AnaSpec Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) then oligomerization proceeded as described resulting in fluorescent 647-AβO. The quality of the oligomeric preparation was verified by western blot analysis using the AβO-specific 6E10 antibody (cat# 803002; BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). The characterization and toxicity of AβO prepared by this method has been thoroughly documented by our group and others.46,48,49,50

Amyloid-β oligomer binding to mature neurons

To determine whether mature neurons derived from NPLT-treated NSC (NPLT-MN) are resilient to AβO binding, we treated NSC with NPLT or Sham treatment as described above, then differentiated the cells on laminin-coated 8-well chamber slides for five days at a density of 50,000 cells/well. On the fifth day of differentiation, when the majority of cells express the mature neuron marker βIII-tubulin, we exposed NPLT- and Sham-MN to 2.5 μM 647-AβO diluted in fresh differentiation media, and incubated cells at 37°C for 30 min. After 30 min cells were washed three times with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS), followed by 30-min fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature. Fixed cells were then washed three times with DPBS and immunostained for the neuronal cytoskeletal protein βIII-tubulin (cat# G712A; Promega, Madison, WI), and the nuclear stain DAPI. Slides were then imaged on an Olympus FV1200 laser scanning confocal microscope at 60× magnification. Images were manually quantified by a blinded experimenter using imageJ to measure total neurite length, and total neurite-bound 647-AβO puncta. A minimum of 50 neurites were quantified per well, data are represented as single-well averages for Sham-MN (n = 10 wells) and NPLT-MN (n = 11).

Mitochondrial membrane potential assay

Mitochondrial dysfunction is a known phenotype in AD-affected neurons, and Aβ has been shown to directly impair mitochondrial transport and respiration.51–53 Photobiomodulation (PBM) with near-infrared light (NIR), including 808 nm light used in NPLT, is also known to produce therapeutic benefits by stimulation of mitochondrial respiration via cytochrome c oxidase.22,54

To test metabolic resilience against AβO in NPLT-MN we used a flow cytometry-based Mitotracker assay using the mitochondrial membrane potential-dependent dye Mitotracker Deep Red (MTDR; cat# M22426; Thermo Fisher, St Louis, MO) to label actively respiring mitochondria. This technique has been demonstrated to detect changes in mitochondrial membrane potential induced by direct and indirect inhibition of mitochondrial electron transport55,56 Sham- and NPLT-MN cultures were incubated for 30 min with 2.5 µM AβO in complete differentiation media in 6-well plates. After incubation, cells were washed with fresh media then replaced in media containing 15 nM MTDR and incubated another 30 min. After Mitotracker staining cells were rinsed once with DPBS then detached using Accutase (Millipore, Burlington, MA). Detached cells were collected and spun down for 1 min at 300xG. Cell pellets were resuspended in 500 µL DPBS and kept on ice for flow cytometry analysis. MTDR fluorescence was measured using the red (642 nm) laser in a Guava EasyCyte 8 flow cytometer with GuavaSoft InCyte software (Millipore, Burlington, MA), a total of 15,000 events were acquired per sample. Acquisition gates were established based on FSC versus MTDR fluorescence values for control samples of unlabeled cells (Supplemental Figure 2). Data are represented as the % of cells within the MTDR + gate.

mRNA sequencing and western blot assay

To investigate potential mechanisms for induced resilience in NPLT-MN, we treated NSC in 96-well plates with ∼300 J/cm2 NPLT then seeded them on laminin-coated 6-well plates at a density of ∼20,000 NSC/cm2 and conducted bulk RNA sequencing and western blot analysis. Cells were collected either at 24 h for assessment of early gene expression changes in NSC, or induced toward neuronal differentiation for 5 days, then collected for RNA or protein isolation. Gene expression analysis of NPLT-NSC was conducted by UTMB's Next Generation Sequencing core facility. Briefly, RNA was isolated from triplicate sham- and NPLT-treated NSC 24-h after treatment, or from mature neurons after a 5-day differentiation using the Direct-Zol RNA miniprep kit (Zymo research) following the manufacturer's protocol. RNA samples were then forwarded to the Next Generation Sequencing core facility for library preparation using the NEBNext Ultra II RNA library for illumina sequencing kit (New England Biolabs# E7775) combined with NEBNext polyA mRNA magnetic module (Catalog# E7490). The sequencing was performed on the NextSeq 550 (Illumina) using High Output 150 cycle kit for PE 75 sequencing. Reads were mapped using DESEQ2 and differentially expressed genes in NPLT compared to Sham were determined using an adjusted p value cutoff of 0.01. Pathway analysis of enriched genes was conducted using ShinyGO V0.81. 57 Differentially expressed genes were compared between time points using Venny. 58 A subset of cells from the 5-day differentiation group were separately collected and lysed using radio immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer plus HALT protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher) for protein extraction. Protein concentration was quantified using a Pierce BCA assay kit (Thermo Fisher) and proteins were separated by gel electrophoresis using Novex tris-glycine 10–20% gels. Separated proteins were transferred to PVDF membrane and blotted using the following primary antibodies: HSP60 (Abcam ab46798), LC3A/B (Cell signaling 4108S), and βIII-tubulin (Abcam ab18207). Appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were applied before chemiluminescent visualization using SuperSignal West Pico Plus ECL substrate (Thermo Fisher). Target protein bands were normalized to βIII-tubulin (Figure 2(c)).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

NPLT enhances autophagy-related gene expression in NSC and mature neurons derived from NPLT-treated NSC. (a) Volcano plots and GO pathway analysis for enriched genes in NPLT-NSC 24 h after treatment and after 5 days of neuronal differentiation in vitro. (b) 123 genes enriched both in NSC at 24 h and mature neurons after differentiation map to pathways involved in protein synthesis, processing, and autophagy. (c) Western blot analysis of proteins extracted from mature neurons (MN) differentiated from sham- or NPLT-treated NSC shows increased expression of autophagy related proteins HSP60 and LC3 (A and B). (Unpaired t-test with Welch's correction, **p < 0.01). NSC and mouse whole brain tissues were used as antibody controls.

Results

NPLT-MN are functionally resilient to Aβo toxicity

To assess resilience of NPLT-MN against Aβ oligomer binding, we incubated cells with HiLyte Fluor-647-labeled AβO and quantified 647-AβO puncta bound to neuritic projections (Figure 3). Our analysis revealed that NPLT-MN had significantly fewer neurites with bound 647-AβO compared to Sham-MN (6.44 ± 7.58% versus 35.83 ± 14.10), and fewer 647-AβO puncta when normalized per 25 μm of neurite length (0.12 ± 0.06 versus 0.39 ± 0.15; Figure 3(b)). We found no differences in the average neurite length between NPLT-MN and Sham-MN (25.91 ± 2.52 μm versus 23.24 ± 3.74).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

NPLT-MN show reduced binding of 647-labeled AβO to neurites. (a) Representative confocal microscope images of mature neurons bound with fluorescent-labeled AβO (scale bar = 10 μm). (b) Quantifications of the total fraction of neurites with bound AβO (left) and the total number of AβO bound per 25 μm of neurites quantified. Welch's t-test ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

We next tested whether functional resilience accompanied the decreased binding of AβO to NPLT-MN using a well-established Mitotracker assay to quantify active mitochondrial respiration after AβO exposure. Our results show that AβO exposure caused a significant decrease in the number of metabolically active cells in Sham-MN, but not NPLT-MN. Similarly, AβO-treated NPLT-MN had a significantly higher portion of metabolically active cells compared to AβO-treated Sham-MN (75.60 ± 1.97% versus 67.60 ± 1.22; Figure 4(b)).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

NPLT-MN are resilient to AβO-induced mitochondrial toxicity. (a) Scatterplots showing Mitotracker Deep Red fluorescence Sham- and NPLT-MN with and without 30-min exposure to 2.5 μM AβO. (b) Quantification of MTDR + cell populations from each treatment condition. One-way ANOVA *p > 0.05, **p < 0.01.

NPLT modulates autophagy-related gene expression in cultured NSC and their progeny

To investigate potential mechanisms of induced resilience in NPLT-MN, we treated NSC with NPLT and collected RNA for next-gen sequencing at 24 h post treatment before inducing differentiation, and after 5 days of differentiation. In total, 453 genes were significantly upregulated and 322 downregulated in NPLT-NSC compared to sham after 24 h, and 536 upregulated versus 461 downregulated after neuronal differentiation. Pathway analysis at each time point shows upregulation of genes involved in protein biosynthesis and processing and lipid membrane biosynthesis (Figure 2(a)). Comparison of upregulated gene expression between NSC at 24 h and MN after 5-day differentiation showed 123 genes in common, and pathway analysis of these genes indicated sustained upregulation of genes involved in protein synthesis and processing as well as the FoxO signaling pathway which is a known activator of autophagy and a key regulator of cell metabolism and survival (Figure 2(b)). Western blotting of Sham- and NPLT-MN showed a significant upregulation of the chaperone protein HSP60 and the autophagosome-associated proteins LC3A and LC3B in NPLT MN, consistent with the persistent upregulation of p62 expression found in both RNAseq datasets (Figure 2(c)). These results suggest enhanced autophagy and maintenance of protein folding stress are associated with sustained resilience of mature neurons generated from NPLT-treated NSC in vitro.

Discussion

Modulation of adult hippocampal neurogenesis is a promising potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of AD and other neurodegenerative diseases. It is well documented that AHN declines in normal aging, and to a greater extent in AD.14,16,18,59–62 Despite some evidence suggesting that soluble Aβ species can promote neural stem cell proliferation and neurogenesis, these changes are often found to deplete the NSC pool and yield incomplete neuronal maturation and increased gliogenesis.63–67 Both the preservation of the NSC pool in the hippocampal dentate gyrus, and the stimulation of neurogenesis from hippocampal NSC have produced cognitive and neuropathological benefits in animal models.35,46,68–70 Non-invasive transcranial PBM has been shown to modulate hippocampal neurogenesis in TBI, stroke, and AD.31–35,43 Therapies specifically targeting AHN could prove extremely beneficial for restoring cognitive function in AD, considering the significant role newborn granule neurons play in hippocampal plasticity.71–73 However, even in pre-clinical stages of AD, soluble Aβ and tau oligomers threaten the survival of vulnerable newborn neurons,64,74 therefore, it is imperative that AHN targeted therapies also promote the survival and integration of newborn neurons without also depleting the NSC pool. Here we show, for the first time, acquired resilience in mature neurons differentiated from adult hippocampal NSC treated with PBM.

Soluble Aβ oligomers are believed to be the earliest forming toxic species in the canonical progression of AD, and have been shown to cause synaptic dysfunction, mitochondrial dysfunction, and impaired neurogenesis long before the deposition of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles.48,51–53,64,75–78 It has also recently been shown that Aβ oligomer binding at synapses can facilitate internalization of toxic tau oligomers, leading to neurodegeneration. 79 PBM effectively induces synaptic resilience against Aβ and tau oligomer toxicity in animal models of AD;48,80 however, to our knowledge this is the first demonstration of Aβ-resilient progeny derived from hippocampal neural stem cells treated with PBM. Using a well-established model of preformed labeled Aβ oligomers, and the neuron-specific marker βIII-tubulin, we show reduced AβO binding to neurites, and fewer total neurites affected by AβO in mature neurons derived from NPLT-treated NSC compared to Sham. In addition, NPLT-MN were resilient against metabolic toxicity induced by AβO as shown by our mitochondrial respiration assay. To establish a potential mechanism for the acquired resilience phenotype found in NPLT-MN, we conducted transcriptomic analysis by bulk RNA sequencing both NSC 24 h after NPLT treatment, and MN after a full 5-day differentiation. The sequencing results show an immediate shift towards enhanced pro-neuronal gene expression and decreased glial gene expression as well as enrichment in pathways associated with protein biosynthesis and the misfolded protein response, both essential processes in the differentiation of stem cells into neurons.13,81 In our mature neuron population, we again found enrichment of genes associated with the misfolded protein response as well as lipid biosynthesis and processing, including Apolipoprotein E, whose function is directly linked to clearance of Aβ and mitochondrial function.82–86 When comparing the two time points it became evident that autophagy, a critical process for metabolic and protein folding homeostasis, was a likely contributor to the sustained resilience phenotype. Autophagy is correlated with resilience against AD neuropathology in cognitively intact individuals 87 and has been shown to increase with PBM in animal models of AD. 80 In neural stem cells, autophagy pathways under the control of the transcription factor FOXO3 maintain proteostasis, 15 but upon differentiation into neurons, proteostasis becomes largely dependent on chaperone proteins such as the small heat shock protein HSP60. 88 HSP60 is of particular interest due to its ability to be secreted extracellularly and bind to AβO, altering its conformation and reducing toxicity.50,89 It is possible that increased expression of HSP60 in NPLT-MN facilitates neutralization and sequestration of AβO prior to AβO engaging synapses, preventing synaptic and metabolic dysfunction. Alternatively, NPLT may enhance cell-autonomous protein processing pathways, leading to improved ability to maintain homeostasis during the significant protein folding stress of neuronal differentiation, leading to broadly healthier mature neurons that can resist AβO toxicity.

A known phenomenon in PBM therapy is the biphasic dose response in which therapeutic efficacy peaks at a specific energy density, above which effects are lost or altogether reversed. This effect is thought to be mediated by reactive oxygen species (ROS). 39 Under homeostatic conditions ROS act as signaling molecules to regulate metabolic pathways, cell proliferation and survival, and inflammation,23,24,90,91 but under conditions of metabolic stress excessive ROS can oxidize proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids leading to DNA damage and cell death. 92 While we did not directly measure ROS production in this study, we can make inferences about the effects of NPLT on ROS production from our 24 h RNAseq dataset. In addition to protein synthesis and processing, NPLT-NSC showed increased expression of genes involved in hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt (PI3K-Akt) signaling pathways, both of which are activated by ROS to induce metabolic reprogramming, cell proliferation and survival. 91 Notably, DNA damage repair pathways are overrepresented in the most downregulated genes of that dataset, and we found no evidence of NF-κB activation or any other inflammatory response suggesting that NPLT-NSC effectively maintain redox homeostasis during proliferation and differentiation without the harmful effects of excessive ROS production. PBM has been shown to modulate additional neuronal resilience pathways such as PKA/Sirt1, Creb, and BDNF in vivo;32,34,42,93 however, we did not see any evidence of changes to these pathways in our model.

Further research is necessary to determine the extent of the acquired resilience phenotype of NPLT-MN in vivo because in the era of medicine where cell replacement therapies are already becoming a reality for some neurodegenerative diseases,94–97 the ability to generate new, resilient neurons could significantly improve long-term patient outcomes.

Presently available Aβ-targeted therapies for AD show some effectiveness for slowing the progression of cognitive decline; however, to date, we have no way to effectively restore cognitive function with AD therapies.2,3,98,99 Non-invasive PBM could provide an accessible means to restore or improve cognitive function by stimulating AHN, allowing the formation and integration of new synaptic connections in the hippocampus, and ensuring the survival of newly formed connections between resilient neurons.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-alz-10.1177_13872877261416086 - Supplemental material for Treating hippocampal neural stem cells with nano-pulsed laser therapy generates neurons resilient against amyloid-β oligomer toxicity

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-alz-10.1177_13872877261416086 for Treating hippocampal neural stem cells with nano-pulsed laser therapy generates neurons resilient against amyloid-β oligomer toxicity by Kevin Johnson, Auston Grant, Shrinath Kadamangudi, Armando Arizpe, Kathia Johnson, Rinat Esenaliev, Giulio Taglialatela and Maria-Adelaide Micci in Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Steven Widen and Dr Haiping Hao of the UTMB Next Generation Sequencing core for their assistance with library preparation and processing of mRNA-Seq data.

Footnotes

Ethical considerations: This article does not contain any studies with human or animal participants.

Author contribution(s): Kevin Johnson: Data curation; Investigation; Methodology; Supervision.

Auston Grant: Investigation; Supervision; Visualization.

Shrinath Kadamangudi: Formal analysis; Software; Visualization.

Armando Arizpe: Data curation; Formal analysis.

Kathia Johnson: Data curation; Investigation; Methodology; Supervision.

Rinat Esenaliev: Conceptualization; Funding acquisition; Resources; Supervision.

Giulio Taglialatela: Funding acquisition; Methodology; Resources.

Maria-Adelaide Micci: Conceptualization; Funding acquisition; Project administration; Resources; Supervision; Writing – review & editing.

Funding: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the NIH/NIA R01AG06943302 (MAM/GT), NIH/NINDS R01NS128808 (MAM/RE), and NIH/NIA T32AG067952-01 (KJJ). Funding and resources provided by the Moody Brain Health Institute at UTMB.

The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research,authorship,and/or publication of this article: Giulio Taglialatela is an Editorial Board Member of this journal but was not involved in the peer-review process of this article nor had access to any information regarding its peer-review.

Data availability statement: RNA-Seq data supporting the findings of this study are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/, accession number GSE308539. All other data are available within the article and/or its supplemental material.

Supplemental material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

  • 1.Alzheimer’s Association. 2024 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20: 3708–3821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.van Dyck CH, Swanson CJ, Aisen P, et al. Lecanemab in early Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 2023; 388: 9–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sims JR, Zimmer JA, Evans CD, et al. Donanemab in early symptomatic Alzheimer disease: the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2023; 330: 512–527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Villemagne VL, Burnham S, Bourgeat P, et al. Amyloid β deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12: 357–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bateman RJ, Xiong C, Benzinger TLS, et al. Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 795–804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Colucci-D’Amato L, Bonavita V, Porzio U. The end of the central dogma of neurobiology: stem cells and neurogenesis in adult CNS. Neurol Sci 2006; 27: 266–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ramon y Cajal S. Degeneration and regeneration of the nervous system. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1928. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Altman J. Are new neurons formed in the brains of adult mammals? Science 1962; 135: 1127–1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Altman J, Das GD. Autoradiographic and histological evidence of postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis in rats. J Comp Neurol 1965; 124: 319–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kaplan MS, Hinds JW. Neurogenesis in the adult rat: electron microscopic analysis of light radioautographs. Science 1977; 197: 1092–1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Reynolds BA, Weiss S. Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science 1992; 255: 1707–1710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Palmer TD, Takahashi J, Gage FH. The adult rat hippocampus contains primordial neural stem cells. Mol Cell Neurosci 1997; 8: 389–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang CL, Ohkubo R, Mu WC, et al. The mitochondrial unfolded protein response regulates hippocampal neural stem cell aging. Cell Metab 2023; 35: 996–1008.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Harris L, Rigo P, Stiehl T, et al. Coordinated changes in cellular behavior ensure the lifelong maintenance of the hippocampal stem cell population. Cell Stem Cell 2021; 28: 863–876.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Audesse AJ, Dhakal S, Hassell LA, et al. FOXO3 Directly regulates an autophagy network to functionally regulate proteostasis in adult neural stem cells. PLoS Genet 2019; 15: e1008097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Beckervordersandforth R, Ebert B, Schäffner I, et al. Role of mitochondrial metabolism in the control of early lineage progression and aging phenotypes in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Neuron 2017; 93: 560–573.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Boldrini M, Fulmore CA, Tartt AN, et al. Human hippocampal neurogenesis persists throughout aging. Cell Stem Cell 2018; 22: 589–599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Moreno-Jiménez EP, Flor-García M, Terreros-Roncal J, et al. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is abundant in neurologically healthy subjects and drops sharply in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Med 2019; 25: 554–560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Briley D, Ghirardi V, Woltjer R, et al. Preserved neurogenesis in non-demented individuals with AD neuropathology. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 27812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hamblin MR. Mechanisms and mitochondrial redox signaling in photobiomodulation. Photochem Photobiol 2018; 94: 199–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pchelin P, Shkarupa D, Smetanina N, et al. Red light photobiomodulation rescues murine brain mitochondrial respiration after acute hypobaric hypoxia. J Photochem Photobiol B 2023; 239: 112643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wong-Riley MTT, Liang HL, Eells JT, et al. Photobiomodulation directly benefits primary neurons functionally inactivated by toxins: role of cytochrome c oxidase. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 4761–4771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Stepanov YV, Golovynska I, Zhang R, et al. Near-infrared light reduces β-amyloid-stimulated microglial toxicity and enhances survival of neurons: mechanisms of light therapy for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther 2022; 14: 84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wu X, Shen Q, Chang H, et al. Promoted CD4+ T cell-derived IFN-γ/IL-10 by photobiomodulation therapy modulates neurogenesis to ameliorate cognitive deficits in APP/PS1 and 3xTg-AD mice. J Neuroinflammation 2022; 19: 253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ahamed Basha A, Mathangi DC, Shyamala R. Effect of LED photobiomodulation on fluorescent light induced changes in cellular ATPases and cytochrome c oxidase activity in Wistar rat. Lasers Med Sci 2016; 31: 1803–1809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Salehpour F, Khademi M, Hamblin MR. Photobiomodulation therapy for dementia: a systematic review of pre-clinical and clinical studies. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 83: 1431–1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Berman MH, Halper JP, Nichols TW, et al. Photobiomodulation with near infrared light helmet in a pilot, placebo controlled clinical trial in dementia patients testing memory and cognition. J Neurol Neurosci 2017; 8: 176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Huang JH, Nizamutdinov D, Qi X, et al. Transcranial near infrared light stimulations improve cognition in patients with dementia. Aging Dis 2021; 12: 954–963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schiffer F, Johnston AL, Ravichandran C, et al. Psychological benefits 2 and 4 weeks after a single treatment with near infrared light to the forehead: a pilot study of 10 patients with major depression and anxiety. Behav Brain Funct 2009; 5: 46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lee TL, Chan DY, Chan DT, et al. Transcranial photobiomodulation improves cognitive function, post-concussion, and PTSD symptoms in mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2025; 42: 1695–1707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wu Q, Xuan W, Ando T, et al. Low-level laser therapy for closed-head traumatic brain injury in mice: effect of different wavelengths. Lasers Surg Med 2012; 44: 218–226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xuan W, Agrawal T, Huang L, et al. Low-level laser therapy for traumatic brain injury in mice increases brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and synaptogenesis. J Biophotonics 2015; 8: 502–511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Oron A, Oron U, Chen J, et al. Low-level laser therapy applied transcranially to rats after induction of stroke significantly reduces long-term neurological deficits. Stroke 2006; 37: 2620–2624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yun YC, Jang D, Yoon SB, et al. Laser acupuncture exerts neuroprotective effects via regulation of Creb, Bdnf, Bcl-2, and Bax gene expressions in the hippocampus. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2017; 2017: 7181637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Johnson KJ, Johnson K, Grant A, et al. Photobiomodulation therapy increases neural stem cell pool in aged 3xTg-AD mice. PLoS One 2025; 20: e0321668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Karu TI, Pyatibrat LV, Kolyakov SF, et al. Absorption measurements of a cell monolayer relevant to phototherapy: reduction of cytochrome c oxidase under near IR radiation. J Photochem Photobiol B 2005; 81: 98–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang EB, Kaur R, Fierro M, et al. Safety and penetration of light into the brain . In: Hamblin MR, Huang Y. (eds) Photobiomodulation in the brain. London, UK: Elsevier Inc., 2019, pp.49–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Giacci MK, Wheeler L, Lovett S, et al. Differential effects of 670 and 830 nm red near infrared irradiation therapy: a comparative study of optic nerve injury, retinal degeneration, traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. PLoS One 2014; 9: e104565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hamblin MR, Huang YY, Sharma SK, et al. Biphasic dose response in low level light therapy - an update. Dose Response 2011; 9: 602–618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hashmi JT, Huang YY, Sharma SK, et al. Effect of pulsing in low-level light therapy. Lasers Surg Med 2010; 42: 450–466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tang L, Jiang H, Sun M, et al. Pulsed transcranial photobiomodulation generates distinct beneficial neurocognitive effects compared with continuous wave transcranial light. Lasers Med Sci 2023; 38: 203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Esenaliev RO, Petrov IY, Petrov Y, et al. Nano-pulsed laser therapy is neuroprotective in a rat model of blast-induced neurotrauma. J Neurotrauma 2018; 1522: 1510–1522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mocciaro E, Grant A, Esenaliev RO, et al. Non-invasive transcranial nano-pulsed laser therapy ameliorates cognitive function and prevents aberrant migration of neural progenitor cells in the hippocampus of rats subjected to traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2020; 1123: 1108–1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Petrov IY, Micci M-A, Prough DS, et al. Optoacoustic theranostics. Proc. SPIE 10494, Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2018, 104941F. 28 March 2018.
  • 45.Marcatti M, Fracassi A, Montalbano M, et al. Aβ / tau oligomer interplay at human synapses supports shifting therapeutic targets for Alzheimer ‘ s disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 2022; 79: 222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Micci MA, Krishnan B, Bishop E, et al. Hippocampal stem cells promotes synaptic resistance to the dysfunctional impact of amyloid beta oligomers via secreted exosomes. Mol Neurodegener 2019; 14: 25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Reese LC, Zhang WR, Dineley KT, et al. Selective induction of calcineurin activity and signaling by oligomeric amyloid beta. Aging Cell 2008; 7: 824–835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Comerota MM, Krishnan B, Taglialatela G. Near infrared light decreases synaptic vulnerability to amyloid beta oligomers. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 15012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Fracassi A, Marcatti M, Zolochevska O, et al. Oxidative damage and antioxidant response in frontal cortex of demented and nondemented individuals with Alzheimer’s neuropathology. J Neurosci 2021; 41: 538–554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Marino C, Krishnan B, Cappello F, et al. Hsp60 protects against amyloid β oligomer synaptic toxicity via modification of toxic oligomer conformation. ACS Chem Neurosci 2019; 10: 2858–2867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Schaefer PM, Von Einem B, Walther P, et al. Metabolic characterization of intact cells reveals intracellular amyloid beta but not its precursor protein to reduce mitochondrial respiration. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0168157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Casley CS, Canevari L, Land JM, et al. β-amyloid inhibits integrated mitochondrial respiration and key enzyme activities. J Neurochem 2002; 80: 91–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Calkins MJ, Reddy PH. Amyloid beta impairs mitochondrial anterograde transport and degenerates synapses in Alzheimer ‘ s disease neurons. Biochem Biophys Acta 2011; 1812: 507–513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wang X, Tian F, Soni SS, et al. Interplay between up-regulation of cytochrome-c-oxidase and hemoglobin oxygenation induced by near-infrared laser. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 30540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhou R, Yazdi AS, Menu P. A role for mitochondria in NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nature 2011; 469: 221–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhong Z, Umemura A, Sanchez-Lopez E, et al. NF-κB restricts inflammasome activation via elimination of damaged mitochondria. Cell 2016; 164: 896–910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ge SX, Jung D, Jung D, et al. ShinyGO: a graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants. Bioinformatics 2020; 36: 2628–2629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Oliveros JC. Venny. An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn’s diagrams. https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html (2007–2015).
  • 59.Knoth R, Singec I, Ditter M, et al. Murine features of neurogenesis in the human hippocampus across the lifespan from 0 to 100 years. PLoS One 2010; 5: e8809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ibrayeva A, Bay M, Pu E, et al. Early stem cell aging in the mature brain. Cell Stem Cell 2021; 28: 955–966.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kalamakis G, Brüne D, Ravichandran S, et al. Quiescence modulates stem cell maintenance and regenerative capacity in the aging brain. Cell 2019; 176: 1407–1419.e14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hamilton LK, Aumont A, Julien C, et al. Widespread deficits in adult neurogenesis precede plaque and tangle formation in the 3xTg mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurosci 2010; 32: 905–920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Yenkoyan K, Margaryan T, Matinyan S, et al. Effects of β-amyloid (1-42) administration on the main neurogenic niches of the adult brain: amyloid-induced neurodegeneration influences neurogenesis. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23: 15444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Komleva YK, Lopatina OL, Gorina YV, et al. Early changes in hyppocampal neurogenesis induced by soluble Aβ1–42 oligomers. Biochem Mosc Suppl B Biomed Chem 2018; 12: 330–338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jin K, Galvan V, Xie L, et al. Enhanced neurogenesis in Alzheimer’s disease transgenic (PDGF-APP Sw,Ind) mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101: 13363–13367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Perry EK, Johnson M, Ekonomou A, et al. Neurogenic abnormalities in Alzheimer ‘ s disease differ between stages of neurogenesis and are partly related to cholinergic pathology. Neurobiol Dis 2012; 47: 155–162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Meyer K, Feldman HM, Lu T, et al. REST And neural gene network dysregulation in iPSC models of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Rep 2019; 26: 1112–1127.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sahay A, Scobie KN, Hill AS, et al. Increasing adult hippocampal neurogenesis is sufficient to improve pattern separation. Nature 2011; 472: 466–470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Walgrave H, Balusu S, Snoeck S, et al. Restoring miR-132 expression rescues adult hippocampal neurogenesis and memory deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Stem Cell 2021; 28: 1805–1821.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Toni N, Gallopin T, Richetin K, et al. Genetic manipulation of adult-born hippocampal neurons rescues memory in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2015; 138: 440–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Evans A, Terstege DJ, Scott GA, et al. Neurogenesis mediated plasticity is associated with reduced neuronal activity in CA1 during context fear memory retrieval. Sci Rep 2022; 12: 7016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ge S, Yang C, Hsu K, et al. A critical period for enhanced synaptic plasticity in newly generated neurons of the adult brain. Neuron 2007; 54: 105–110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Schmidt-Hieber C, Jones P, Bischofberger J. Enhanced synaptic plasticity in newly generated granule cells of the adult hippocampus. Nature 2004; 429: 184–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ebenezer PJ, Weidner AM, LeVine H, III, et al. Neuron specific toxicity of oligomeric beta amyloid: implications for JUN-kinase and oxidative stress. J Alzheimers Dis 2012; 22: 839–848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kayed R, Lasagna-Reeves CA. Molecular mechanisms of amyloid oligomers toxicity. J Alzheimers Dis 2013; 33: S67–S78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Puzzo D, Piacentini R, Fá M, et al. LTP And memory impairment caused by extracellular aβ and tau oligomers is APP-dependent. Elife 2017; 6: e26991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Dineley KT, Kayed R, Neugebauer V, et al. Amyloid-β oligomers impair fear conditioned memory in a calcineurin-dependent fashion in mice. J Neurosci Res 2010; 88: 2923–2932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Chen JX, Yan SD. Amyloid-β-induced mitochondrial dysfunction. J Alzheimers Dis 2007; 12: 177–184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kadamangudi S, Marcatti M, Zhang WR, et al. Amyloid-β oligomers increase the binding and internalization of tau oligomers in human synapses. Acta Neuropathol 2024; 149: 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Comerota MM, Tumurbaatar B, Krishnan B, et al. Near infrared light treatment reduces synaptic levels of toxic tau oligomers in two transgenic mouse models of human tauopathies. Mol Neurobiol 2019; 56: 3341–3355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mohrin M, Widjaja A, Liu Y, et al. The mitochondrial unfolded protein response is activated upon hematopoietic stem cell exit from quiescence. Aging Cell 2018; 17: e12756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Yin J, Reiman EM, Beach TG, et al. Effect of ApoE isoforms on mitochondria in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2020; 94: E2404–E2411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Zhao J, Ikezu TC, Lu W, et al. APOE Deficiency impacts neural differentiation and cholesterol biosynthesis in human iPSC-derived cerebral organoids. Stem Cell Res Ther 2023; 14: 214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Zhao J, Fu Y, Yamazaki Y, et al. APOE4 Exacerbates synapse loss and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease patient iPSC-derived cerebral organoids. Nat Commun 2020; 11: 5540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Meyer-Acosta KK, Diaz-Guerra E, Varma P, et al. APOE4 Impacts cortical neurodevelopment and alters network formation in human brain organoids. Stem Cell Rep 2025; 20: 102537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Lin YT, Seo J, Gao F, et al. APOE4 Causes widespread molecular and cellular alterations associated with Alzheimer’s disease phenotypes in human iPSC-derived brain cell types. Neuron 2018; 98: 1141–1154.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Tumurbaatar B, Fracassi A, Scaduto P, et al. Preserved autophagy in cognitively intact non-demented individuals with Alzheimer ‘ s neuropathology. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19: 5355–5370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Vonk WIM, Rainbolt TK, Dolan PT, et al. Differentiation drives widespread rewiring of the neural stem cell chaperone network. Mol Cell 2020; 78: 329–345.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Alberti G, Paladino L, Vitale AM, et al. Functions and therapeutic potential of extracellular hsp60, hsp70, and hsp90 in neuroinflammatory disorders. Appl Sci 2021; 11: 736. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Schieber M, Chandel NS. ROS Function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. CURBIO 2014; 24: R453–R462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Averill-Bates D. Reactive oxygen species and cell signaling. Review. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 2024; 1871: 119573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Redza-Dutordoir M, DA A-B. Activation of apoptosis signalling pathways by reactive oxygen species. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 2016; 1863: 2977–2992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Zhang Z, Shen Q, Wu X, et al. Activation of PKA/SIRT1 signaling pathway by photobiomodulation therapy reduces aβ levels in Alzheimer’s disease models. Aging Cell 2020; 19: e13054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Dong W, Liu S, Li S, et al. Cell reprogramming therapy for Parkinson’s disease. Neural Regen Res 2024; 19: 2444–2455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Morizane A. Cell therapy for Parkinson's disease with induced pluripotent stem cells. Inflamm Regen 2023; 43: 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Stoddard-Bennett T, Pera R. Stem cell therapy for Parkinson’s disease: safety and modeling. Neural Regen Res 2020; 15: 36–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Doi D, Magotani H, Kikuchi T, et al. Pre-clinical study of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived dopaminergic progenitor cells for Parkinson’s disease. Nat Commun 2020; 11: 3369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Cummings J. Lessons learned from Alzheimer disease: clinical trials with negative outcomes. Clin Transl Sci 2018; 11: 147–152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Budd Haeberlein S, Aisen PS, Barkhof F, et al. Two randomized phase 3 studies of aducanumab in early Alzheimer’s disease. J Prev Alzheimers Dis 2022; 9: 197–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sj-docx-1-alz-10.1177_13872877261416086 - Supplemental material for Treating hippocampal neural stem cells with nano-pulsed laser therapy generates neurons resilient against amyloid-β oligomer toxicity

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-alz-10.1177_13872877261416086 for Treating hippocampal neural stem cells with nano-pulsed laser therapy generates neurons resilient against amyloid-β oligomer toxicity by Kevin Johnson, Auston Grant, Shrinath Kadamangudi, Armando Arizpe, Kathia Johnson, Rinat Esenaliev, Giulio Taglialatela and Maria-Adelaide Micci in Journal of Alzheimer's Disease


Articles from Journal of Alzheimer's Disease are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES