Abstract
Pustulotic arthro-osteitis (PAO) is a rare chronic inflammatory arthropathy associated with palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP). PAO involves various extra-palmoplantar sites, including spinal lesions. Systemic treatment, including biologics, is required for refractory cases of PAO. We herein report a man diagnosed with PAO who predominantly manifested spinal symptoms. Initial treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and bisphosphonates achieved a minimal response. Risankizumab, an anti-interleukin-23 p19 antibody, was subsequently administered, which resulted in significant improvement after the fourth dose, resolving both spinal and cutaneous manifestations. This case report highlights risankizumab as a potential therapeutic option for refractory PAO with spinal involvement.
Keywords: interleukin-23, palmoplantar pustulosis, pustulotic arthro-osteitis, risankizumab
Introduction
Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic recurrent dermatological disorder characterized by sterile pustules on the palms and soles (1). Its osteoarticular manifestation, pustulotic arthroosteitis (PAO), includes inflammatory synovitis, osteitis, and spondylitis, which can lead to functional impairment (2). Smoking and tonsillar or dental infections are presumed to be important triggering factors exacerbating PPP (3). As another triggering factor, dental metal allergies may induce or exacerbate PPP (4). Treatment of PPP is challenging and usually requires prolonged management (5). Therapeutic standards and published guidelines for PAO treatment have not been completely defined. Anti-interleukin (IL)-23 p19 agents have been approved for refractory PPP under the Japanese health insurance system (6), and the clinical benefits of these biologics against PAO have been suggested.
Previous therapeutic attempts with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept) have shown limited efficacy for PAO (7), while IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors have shown beneficial effects in patients with PPP (8). More recently, IL-23-inhibitors, guselkumab, and risankizumab have been shown to be effective for PPP, and both agents have been approved for the treatment of PPP in Japan (9,10). Nevertheless, real-world evidence regarding its efficacy in PAO remains scarce.
We herein report a refractory PAO patient treated effectively with risankizumab who achieved dermatological and rheumatologic improvement.
Case Reort
A 63-year-old man presented with a 3-month history of persistent thoracic pain. Three months prior, he developed PPP, which gradually spread across both palms and soles and was associated with severe back pain. Until his first visit to our hospital, the patient had been treated with topical steroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; loxoprofen sodium 180 mg/day) for 2 months. However, these treatments failed to improve his symptoms, and the pain in the thoracic spine persisted. The patient was referred to our hospital for a further examination of thoracic spinal pain and multiple pustular lesions on both palms and soles. His medical history revealed chronic smoking (10 cigarettes/day, 40 years) but no significant familial history. His history was otherwise unremarkable with no dental metal allergy, periodontitis, or tonsillitis.
A skin examination revealed multiple pustular lesions on both palmar and plantar surfaces (Fig. 1). A physical examination revealed tenderness in the thoracic spine that was exacerbated by anteflexion. No swelling or tenderness was observed in the anterior chest wall. Neither sacroiliac joint pain nor peripheral joint pain was noted.
Figure 1.

Cutaneous findings of palmoplantar pustulosis on the palms and soles. Cutaneous findings of palmoplantar pustulosis of the palms and soles. A small number of blisters and pustules and scattered scales on erythematous skin were present on both palms (A) and soles (B) before the start of risankizumab treatment.
A blood analysis (Table) showed an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of 51 mm/h and C-reactive protein (CRP) of 2.44 mg/dL (reference range, <0.30 mg/dL). The complete blood count and liver and renal function measurements were all within the normal range. Rheumatoid factor, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody, human leukocyte antigen B27, and antinuclear antibodies were all negative. He had moderate thoracic spinal pain, suggestive of concomitant PAO. Conventional radiography of the sacroiliac joint showed no abnormalities (Fig. 2); therefore, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the thoracic spine was performed. Short-tau inversion recovery MRI of the cervical and thoracic spine revealed a high signal intensity in multiple vertebral lesions (Fig. 3; before), corroborating the presence of spondylitis in multiple vertebral lesions. He fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for PAO (11), and PPP with PAO was diagnosed. The patient stopped smoking after receiving education for smoking cessation.
Table.
Laboratory Findings on Admission.
| Peripheral blood | Immunoserological test | |||||
| Red blood cells | 436×104 | /μL | C-reactive protein | 2.44 | mg/dL (<0.30) | |
| Hemoglobin | 13.6 | g/dL | Erythrocyte sedimentation rate | 51 | mm/hr (<10) | |
| Hematocrit | 40.7 | % | IgG | 1,162 | mg/dL (861-1,747) | |
| Platelet | 58.3×104 | /μL | IgA | 249 | mg/dL (110-410) | |
| White blood cells | 7,100 | /μL | IgM | 93 | mg/dL (39-190) | |
| Neutrophil | 53 | % | RF | 10 | IU/mL (<15) | |
| Eosinophil | 5 | % | Anti-CCP Ab | 2.5 | U/mL (<4.5) | |
| Monocyte | 10 | % | MMP-3 | 36 | ng/mL (<121) | |
| Lymphocyte | 32 | % | ANA | <40 | ||
| Basophil | 1 | % | MPO-ANCA | (-) | (<3.5 IU/mL) | |
| Blood chemistry | PR3-ANCA | (-) | (<2.0 IU/mL) | |||
| Total protein | 7.4 | g/dL (6.6-8.1) | Microbiological test | |||
| Total bilirubin | 0.4 | mg/dL (0.4-1.5) | HBsAg | (-) | ||
| Albumin | 3.9 | g/dL (4.1-5.1) | Anti-HCV Ab | (-) | ||
| Aspartate aminotransferase | 16 | IU/L (13-30) | β-D-glucan | 11 | pg/mL (<20) | |
| Alanine aminotransferase | 14 | IU/L (10-42) | Procalcitonin | 20 | pg/mL (<50) | |
| Lactate dehydrogenase | 131 | IU/L (124-222) | CMV antigenemia | (0, 0) | ||
| Alkaline phosphatase | 109 | IU/L (106-322) | T-spot | (-) | ||
| Creatine kinase | 55 | IU/L (59-248) | ||||
| Blood urea nitrogen | 6.0 | mg/dL (8-20) | Urinalysis | normal | ||
| Cr | 0.75 | mg/dL (0.65-1.07) | ||||
| Na | 140 | mEq/L (138-145) | ||||
| K | 3.8 | mEq/L (3.6-4.8) | ||||
| Cl | 105 | mEq/L (101-108) | ||||
| Calcium | 10.0 | mg/dL (8.6-10.1) |
ANA: antinuclear antibody, ANCA: anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, CCP: cyclic citrullinated peptide, CMV: cytomegalovirus, HBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen, HCV: hepatitis C virus, MMP-3: matrix metalloproteinase-3, MPO: myeloperoxidase, PR3: proteinase 3, RF: rheumatoid factor
Figure 2.

Radiography of sacroiliac joints. Neither joint space narrowing nor subchondral sclerosis were observed in the bilateral sacroiliac joints.
Figure 3.
MRI findings of the cervical and thoracic spine before and after risankizumab treatment. Sagittal T1-weighted (T1WT) and short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) images of the spine displaying high signal intensities on STIR images of anterior vertebral body lesions of the cervical and thoracic spine (white arrows) before risankizumab treatment (Before). Note that the high signal intensities on STIR images resolved 28 weeks after the start of risankizumab treatment (After).
He was treated with bisphosphonates (risedronate 17.5 mg/weekly) and salazosulphapiridine (500 mg/day); however, his thoracic spinal pain gradually worsened, and his serum CRP level was further elevated (8.78 mg/dL). Therefore, risankizumab was initiated. The drug was first administered 3 months after the first visit to our hospital via subcutaneous injection at a standard dose of 150 mg, followed by a second injection 4 weeks later and then 1 injection every 12 weeks. Bilateral cutaneous lesions on the palms and soles showed marked improvement (Fig. 4) after the start of risankizumab injection. Thoracic pain was also resolved 3 months after the start of risankizumab injection in accordance with the normalization of laboratory data (ESR: 5 mm/h and CRP: 0.11 mg/dL). The disease activity was markedly reduced, as evaluated by the Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area Severity Index (PPPASI) (12). The activity at the initiation of risankizumab was as follows: PPPASI, 16.8; and patient global assessment (PtGA), 70 mm. At the last evaluation performed at 28 weeks, the cutaneous symptoms had largely improved (PPPASI=2.3), as had the PtGA (15 mm). Follow-up MRI was performed six months after starting risankizumab therapy and showed the disappearance of abnormal signals in the cervical and thoracic vertebral lesions (Fig. 3), suggesting that risankizumab could be an effective treatment for refractory cases of PAO.
Figure 4.

Cutaneous findings of palmoplantar pustulosis atter risankizumab treatment. Cutaneous findings on the palms (A) and soles (B) 28 weeks after starting risankizumab. Skin lesions of palmoplantar pustulosis were improved.
Discussion
PAO is a significant comorbidity associated with PPP, and Japanese patients with PAO have been reported (13). Although PAO manifests as anterior chest wall lesions, spinal, sacroiliac, and peripheral joint lesions are also known to be affected (14). Synovitis acne pustulosis hyperostosis-osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome is a rare inflammatory osteoarticular disorder that encompasses many diseases, including PAO. Indeed, more than half of Japanese patients with PAO fulfill the diagnostic criteria for SAPHO syndrome (13), and the present case meets Kahn's diagnostic criteria for SAPHO syndrome (17).
Owing to its rarity, therapeutic strategies for PAO have not been standardized and are mostly based on case reports or case series. Generally, NSAIDs and analgesics constitute first-line interventions for pain management in PAO, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) show benefits in certain cases (18). Bisphosphonates have emerged as alternative treatments owing to their inhibitory effects on bone resorption and the potential to alleviate joint symptoms (19). Nevertheless, their efficacy in cutaneous and joint symptoms remains controversial (5). Consistent with the refractory nature of PAO, initial treatments of NSAIDs, salazosulphapiridine, and bisphosphonates failed to yield satisfactory results in the present patient. Although TNF inhibitors have been used for refractory PAO, their efficacy is yet to be demonstrated in randomized controlled trials (20). Notably, IL-23-targeting treatments show promise for managing PPP (1). However, the efficacy of these treatments requires further investigation for real-world applications.
MRI facilitates the early detection of spinal inflammation before structural damage occurs (21). MRI effectively identified spinal inflammation in our patient, which was substantially alleviated following risankizumab treatment, as evidenced by radiological improvement and normalization of the acute-phase reactants. Recent single-cell analyses have highlighted that the inflammatory pathway in PPP involves dendritic cell-mediated IL-23 production and subsequent activation and proliferation of T helper 17 cells (22).
A Japanese phase III RCT comparing the IL-23 p19 inhibitor guselkumab to placebo revealed significant improvements in dermatological symptoms in Japanese patients with PPP (9). A subgroup analysis of PAO patients in this study demonstrated that guselkumab treatment resulted in the improvement of PAO signs and symptoms, suggesting that guselkumab has potential as a novel therapeutic option for treating PAO (23). In addition, guselkumab showed improvement in the articular manifestations evidenced by MRI findings, while a slight decrease in the CRP level was observed in the guselkumab group at week 52 compared to baseline in this subgroup analysis (23). In our case, risankizumab successfully improved the dermatological and spinal involvement of PPP as well as the normalization of CRP and ESR.
Cytokine blockade therapies are valuable in addressing cytokine imbalances in refractory PPP (1). Risankizumab is a human monoclonal IgG1 antibody targeting IL-23p19 (24). A recent randomized phase 3 trial in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe PPP demonstrated greater improvement in PPPASI change from baseline at week 16 with risankizumab versus placebo (10). Nevertheless, data regarding the effectiveness of risankizumab against PAO remain limited. Risankizumab may improve joint involvement, including spinal lesions of PAO, by inhibiting the IL-23 pathway. To our knowledge, this is the first known report of the effectiveness of risankizumab in achieving both dermatologic disease improvement of PPP as well as the spinal involvement of PAO.
Several limitations associated with the present study warrant mention. First, the effect of methotrexate (MTX) was not evaluated, as MTX seems to be mainly used to treat peripheral arthritis and was not used in this case. Second, we have only reported the findings at one-year follow-up in our case, so long-term observation to conclude the effectiveness of risankizumab against spinal involvement in PAO is needed.
In conclusion, our case underscores the effectiveness of risankizumab in the treatment of refractory PAO with spinal involvement. IL-23p19-targeted therapy appears promising as a novel therapeutic option for refractory PAO patients unresponsive to conventional treatments, including DMARDs and bisphosphonates. Further case accumulation and extended follow-up studies are necessary to validate the long-term efficacy and safety of risankizumab.
Appropriate written consent was obtained from the patient.
The authors state that they have no Conflict of Interest (COI).
References
- 1.Misiak-Galazka M, Zozula J, Rudnicka L. Palmoplantar pustulosis: recent advances in etiopathogenesis and emerging treatments. Am J Clin Dermatol 21: 355-370, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yamamoto T. Pustulotic arthro-osteitis associated with palmoplantar pustulosis. J Dermatol 40: 857-863, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yamamoto T. Triggering role of focal infection in the induction of extra-palmoplantar lesions and pustulotic arthro-osteitis associated with palmoplantar pustulosis. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 72: 89-92, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brunasso Vernetti AMG, Puntoni M, Massone C. Palmoplantar pustulosis and allergies: a systematic review. Dermatol Pract Concept 9: 105-110, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Xu JM, Wang HM, Jin HE. An update date on therapeutic options for palmoplantar pustulosis: a narrative review and expert recommendations. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 19: 499-516, 2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Murakami M, Terui T. Palmoplantar pustulosis: current understanding of disease definition and pathomechanism. J Dermatol Sci 98: 13-19, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Obeid G, Do G, Kirby L, Hughes C, Sbidian E, Le Cleach L. Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1: CD011628, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Leong HF, Wang WH, Peng F. Biologics as a novel treatment option for palmoplantar pustulosis: a comprehensive review. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 41: 262-269, 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Terui T, Kobayashi S, Okubo Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in Japanese patients with palmoplantar pustulosis: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol 155: 1153-1161, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Okubo Y, Murakami M, Kobayashi S, et al. Risankizumab in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe palmoplantar pustulosis: results from the randomized, phase 3 JumPPP study. J Dermatol 52: 593-602, 2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tsuji S, Okubo Y, Kishimoto M, et al. Modified pustulotic arthro-osteitis diagnostic guidance 2022 - Modified Sonozaki criteria secondary publication. Mod Rheumatol 34: 1076-1078, 2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bhushan M, Burden AD, McElhone K, James R, Vanhoutte FP, Griffiths CE. Oral liarozole in the treatment of palmoplantar pustular psoriasis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Br J Dermatol 145: 546-553, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yamamoto T, Hiraiwa T, Tobita R, et al. Characteristics of Japanese patients with pustulotic arthro-osteitis associated with palmoplantar pustulosis: a multicenter study. Int J Dermatol 59: 441-444, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kondo N, Sakai Y, Kakutani R, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment status of pustulotic arthro-osteitis: a single-center study involving 51 cases. J Dermatol 48: 1724-1730, 2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kishimoto M, Taniguchi Y, Tsuji S, et al. SAPHO syndrome and pustulotic arthro-osteitis. Mod Rheumatol 32: 665-674, 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mori Y, Izumiyama T, Okuno H, et al. Assessment of clinical and radiological characteristics of Japanese patients with synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis syndrome. Mod Rheumatol 34: 806-812, 2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kahn MF, Khan MA. The SAPHO syndrome. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 8: 333-362, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Adişen E, Gürer MA. Therapeutic options for palmoplantar pustulosis. Clin Exp Dermatol 35: 219-222, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Just A, Adams S, Brinkmeier T, et al. Successful treatment of primary chronic osteomyelitis in SAPHO syndrome with bisphosphonates. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 6: 657-660, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tsiogkas SG, Grammatikopoulou MG, Kontouli KM, et al. Efficacy of biologic agents for palmoplantar psoriasis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 19: 1485-1498, 2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Krabbe S, Østergaard M, Pedersen SJ, et al. Canada-Denmark MRI scoring system of the spine in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: updated definitions, scoring rules and inter-reader reliability in a multiple reader setting. RMD Open 5: e001057, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McCluskey D, Benzian-Olsson N, Mahil SK, et al. Single-cell analysis implicates TH17-to-TH2 cell plasticity in the pathogenesis of palmoplantar pustulosis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 150: 882-893, 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yamamoto T, Fukuda K, Morita A, et al. Efficacy of guselkumab in a subpopulation with pustulotic arthro-osteitis through week 52: an exploratory analysis of a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japanese patients with palmoplantar pustulosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 34: 2318-2329, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pang Y, D'Cunha R, Winzenborg I, Veldman G, Pivorunas V, Wallace K. Risankizumab: mechanism of action, clinical and translational science. Clin Transl Sci 17: e13706, 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

