Abstract
A popular program among consumer action groups involves publicizing comparative food price information (CFPI) gathered from retail stores. Its significance is based on the assumption that publishing CFPI maximizes retail competition (i.e., moderates price levels or price increases) and occasions more frugal store selections among consumers. We tested these assumptions during a 2-year analysis. Specifically, we monitored the prices of two distinct market baskets in the supermarkets of two midwestern cities (target and contrast cities). Following a lengthy baseline, we published the prices of only one of the market baskets at stores in the target city in the local newspaper on five different occasions. The results suggested that reductions in price inflation occurred for both market baskets at the independently operated target stores. The corporate chain stores were not similarly affected. In addition, surveys indicated that many consumers used the CFPI as a basis for store selection. Finally, the analysis included a discussion of the politics, economics, and future of CFPI programs.
Keywords: community behavior analysis, behavioral community psychology, consumer affairs, public interest research, public posting, countercontrol
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Greene B. F., Neistat M. D. Behavior analysis in consumer affairs: encouraging dental professionals to provide consumers with shielding from unnecessary X-ray exposure. J Appl Behav Anal. 1983 Spring;16(1):13–27. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1983.16-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]