Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1984 Winter;17(4):429–440. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-429

Delayed reinforcement as an indiscriminable contingency in verbal/nonverbal correspondence training

Ruth A Baer 1,2, Julie A Williams 1,2, Pamela G Osnes 1,2, Trevor F Stokes 1,2
PMCID: PMC1307965  PMID: 16795679

Abstract

We investigated the programming of generalization and maintenance of correspondence between verbal and nonverbal behavior in a preschool setting. Four children participated in a series of multiple-baseline designs. In Experiment 1, delayed reinforcement of verbal behavior effectively controlled maintenance of correspondence with previously trained responses and also resulted in generalization of correspondence to one untrained response. As the latter effect was limited, Experiment 2 was a further assessment of the effects of delayed reinforcement of generalization of correspondence to untrained responses, and consistent generalization was shown. Experiment 2 also showed that generalization, if lost, could be recovered through use of “booster training,” in which the original contingencies were reinstated for a brief period. Experiment 3 provided replications, with two additional children, of the effects of delayed reinforcement on maintenance of correspondence. Results are discussed in terms of using delayed reinforcement as an indiscriminable contingency.

Keywords: correspondence training, generalization, delayed reinforcement, verbal behavior, preschool children

Full text

PDF
430

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashby W. A., Wilson G. T. Behavior therapy for obesity: booster sessions and long-term maintenance of weight loss. Behav Res Ther. 1977;15(6):451–463. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(77)90001-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brodsky G. The relation between verbal and non-verbal behavior change. Behav Res Ther. 1967 Aug;5(3):183–191. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(67)90033-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fowler S. A., Baer D. M. "Do I have to be good all day? The timing of delayed reinforcement as a factor in generalization. J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Spring;14(1):13–24. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Israel A. C., Brown M. S. Correspondence training, prior verbal training, and control of nonverbal behavior via control of verbal behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Summer;10(2):333–338. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Israel A. C. Some thoughts on correspondence between saying and doing. J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Summer;11(2):271–276. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Karlan G. R., Rusch F. R. Correspondence between saying and doing: Some thoughts on defining correspondence and future directions for application. J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Spring;15(1):151–162. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kingsley R. G., Wilson G. T. Behavior therapy for obesity: a comparative investigation of long-term efficacy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1977 Apr;45(2):288–298. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.45.2.288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Koegel R. L., Rincover A. Research on the difference between generalization and maintenance in extra-therapy responding. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Spring;10(1):1–12. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McDonald M. R., Budd K. S. "Booster shots" following didactic parent training. Effects of follow-up using graphic feedback and instructions. Behav Modif. 1983 Apr;7(2):211–223. doi: 10.1177/01454455830072006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Risley T. R., Hart B. Developing correspondence between the non-verbal and verbal behavior of preschool children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Winter;1(4):267–281. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rogers-Warren A., Baer D. M. Correspondence between saying and doing: teaching children to share and praise. J Appl Behav Anal. 1976 Fall;9(3):335–354. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stokes T. F., Baer D. M. An implicit technology of generalization. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Summer;10(2):349–367. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Whitman T. L., Scibak J. W., Butler K. M., Richter R., Johnson M. R. Improving classroom behavior in mentally retarded children through correspondence training. J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Winter;15(4):545–564. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES