Abstract
The effects of a movement suppression time-out, which involved punishing any movement or verbalization while a client is in the time-out area, were evaluated in four experiments. The first experiment examined the effects of a DRO procedure and movement suppression plus DRO in suppressing self-injurious behavior in a psychotic child in three different situations. In Experiment 2, the results of the previous experiment were replicated with two dangerous behaviors in a second psychotic child. In a third experiment, movement suppression plus DRO was compared with contingent restraint in reducing inappropriate poking behavior in two settings. The movement suppression procedure eliminated poking whereas contingent restraint had little effect. In the final experiment, movement suppression time-out alone was compared with exclusionary time-out alone and simple corner time-out alone. Self-stimulation occurred at high levels during the exclusionary and simple corner time-out procedures. Self-stimulation was either suppressed or reduced during movement suppression time-out. The movement suppression time-out procedure produced a larger reduction in the target behavior in all three children. The effectiveness of the movement suppression procedure was explained in terms of the suppression of self-stimulation while the time-out procedure was being applied.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barton E. S., Guess D., Garcia E., Baer D. M. Improvement of retardates' mealtime behaviors by timeout procedures using multiple baseline techniques. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Summer;3(2):77–84. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bostow D. E., Bailey J. B. Modification of severe disruptive and aggressive behavior using brief timeout and reinforcement procedures. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Spring;2(1):31–37. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dorsey M. F., Iwata B. A., Reid D. H., Davis P. A. Protective equipment: continuous and contingent application in the treatment of self-injurious behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Summer;15(2):217–230. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Favell J. E., McGimsey J. F., Jones M. L. The use of physical restraint in the treatment of self-injury and as positive reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Summer;11(2):225–241. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harris S. L., Wolchik S. A. Suppression of self-stimulation: three alternative strategies. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Summer;12(2):185–198. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koegel R. L., Covert A. The relationship of self-stimulation to learning in autistic children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Winter;5(4):381–387. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koegel R. L., Firestone P. B., Kramme K. W., Dunlap G. Increasing spontaneous play by suppressing self-stimulation in autistic children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Winter;7(4):521–528. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moldave K., Harris J., Sabo W., Sadnik I. Protein synthesis and aging: studies with cell-free mammalian systems. Fed Proc. 1979 May;38(6):1979–1983. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Porterfield J. K., Herbert-Jackson E., Risley T. R. Contingent observation: an effective and acceptable procedure for reducing disruptive behavior of young children in a group setting. J Appl Behav Anal. 1976 Spring;9(1):55–64. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Repp A. C., Barton L. E., Brulle A. R. A comparison of two procedures for programming the differential reinforcement of other behaviors. J Appl Behav Anal. 1983 Winter;16(4):435–445. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1983.16-435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Solnick J. V., Rincover A., Peterson C. R. Some determinants of the reinforcing and punishing effects of timeout. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Fall;10(3):415–424. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tyler V. O., Jr, Brown D. The use of swift, brief isolation as a group control device for institutionalized delinquents. Behav Res Ther. 1967 Feb;5(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(67)90050-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Webster D. R., Azrin N. H. Required relaxation: a method of inhibiting agitative-disruptive behavior of retardates. Behav Res Ther. 1973 Feb;11(1):67–78. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(73)90070-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]