Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Apr 16.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2026 Feb 1;598:187–199. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2026.01.045

The Mitochondria-Targeted Peptide HDAP2 Reduces Mitochondrial Loss and Retinal Ganglion Cell Degeneration After Optic Nerve Injury

Margaret A MacNeil a, Sara Arain a, Widnie Mentor a, Virginia Garcia-Marin a,b, Alexander Birk a,b
PMCID: PMC13080697  NIHMSID: NIHMS2150067  PMID: 41633465

Abstract

Mitochondrial dysfunction is a critical early driver of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss in optic nerve injury. We evaluated whether HDAP2, a mitochondria-targeted aromatic peptide designed to support mitochondrial membrane integrity, could preserve neuronal structure after optic nerve crush (ONC) in C57BL/6 mice (both sexes, n=31). Systemically administered HDAP2 penetrated the blood–retinal barrier and localized to RGCs and mitochondrial-rich retinal layers. Daily treatment significantly improved RGC survival compared to saline-treated ONC animals. RGC densities increased across central, midperipheral, and peripheral regions.

Transmission electron microscopy revealed that HDAP2 substantially reduced mitochondrial loss within crushed optic nerve axons. Mitochondrial density in HDAP2-treated nerves approached levels observed in uninjured controls and was nearly 3-fold higher than untreated ONC nerves. Mitochondrial morphology was similar across groups, indicating that HDAP2 prevents mitochondrial loss rather than rescuing damaged organelles. HDAP2-treated nerves also exhibited a numerically higher density of structurally intact axons, consistent with reduced ultrastructural degeneration.

These findings demonstrate that HDAP2 limits mitochondrial loss and attenuates neuronal degeneration after ONC. Together, the results support HDAP2 as a promising therapeutic candidate for protecting CNS projection neurons by maintaining mitochondrial stability after axonal injury.

Keywords: retinal ganglion cells, mitochondrial dysfunction, optic nerve crush, neuroprotection, cell-penetrating peptides, glaucoma

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-2150067-f0001.jpg

Introduction

Degeneration of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and their axons is a hallmark of optic neuropathies, including glaucoma (Jassim et al., 2021; Nickells et al., 2012; Williams et al., 2020) traumatic optic neuropathy (Au & Ma, 2022) and diabetic retinopathy (Ren et al., 2022). The cause of these degenerations is unknown, but likely results from multiple factors, including aging (Hou et al., 2022; Nadal-Nicolás et al., 2015; Samuel et al., 2011) impaired axonal transport (Crish et al., 2010), and loss of neurotrophic support (Almasieh et al., 2012), but mitochondrial dysfunction plays a particularly significant role (Schrier & Falk, 2011). As mitochondria generate ATP needed for cellular activities, their dysfunction results in excess production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which initiates a harmful cascade of events that can lead to dendritic atrophy, axonal degeneration, and ultimately neuronal death.

RGCs are among the most metabolically active neurons in the central nervous system and yet have very limited energy reserves when challenged. Cytoplasmic space for excess mitochondria is restricted in RGCs, and mitochondria are strategically positioned within compartments where energy demand is highest (Perge et al., 2009), including at synapses (Faits et al., 2016), in the vicinity of voltage gate sodium channels (Barron et al., 2004) and in unmyelinated axons near the optic nerve head (Bristow et al., 2002; Wilkison et al., 2021). Optic neuropathy-related cellular challenges, such as axonal transport disruption, ischemia/reperfusion, ocular hypertension, and inflammatory signaling, can rapidly perturb mitochondrial homeostasis, leading to mitochondrial membrane depolarization, mitochondrial transport impairment, cristae remodeling, and ROS elevation (Ito & Polo, 2017). These local energetic deficiencies could, in turn, rapidly activate the intrinsic apoptotic pathway of mitochondrial outer-membrane permeabilization, cytochrome c release, and caspase-9/3 activation, which culminates with dendritic atrophy, axonal degeneration and neuronal death (Bossy-Wetzel et al., 1998; Oshitari et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2021). We sought to determine whether a treatment that maintains mitochondrial stability during injury could interrupt this pathological cascade and attenuate RGC loss.

Several new neuroprotective strategies that have focused on enhancing mitochondria function have shown success. One promising approach involves nicotinamide supplementation to maintain NAD+ levels, which have been effective in protecting RGCs in glaucoma (Tribble et al., 2021; Williams et al., 2017). Another strategy, transplantation of mitochondria into the eye, also enhances survival of RGCs after injury (Nascimento-Dos-Santos et al., 2020). However, the benefit of this procedure is short-term and introduces procedural risks and costs that limit long-term clinical feasibility.

Mitochondria-targeted peptides have also shown potential in mitigating the effects of mitochondrial dysfunction. Compounds such as SS-31 (Birk et al., 2013; Szeto, 2014), SkQ (Skulachev et al., 2009), and MitoQ (Murphy & Smith, 2007) protect mitochondria by scavenging ROS, thereby limiting the downstream effects of oxidative damage. SS-31 has demonstrated some efficacy in protecting RGCs in a rat glaucoma model (Wu et al., 2019), but methodological limitations of the study, including small sample sizes and insufficient detail regarding retinal sampling locations, make it difficult to assess the robustness of the observed effects. Other mitochondria-targeted peptides have faced additional challenges including poor bioavailability, proteolytic degradation, and toxicity concerns (Constance & Lim, 2012).

HDAP2 was developed to address these limitations by targeting cardiolipin-rich mitochondrial membranes with high affinity. Prior biochemical studies demonstrate that HDAP2 interacts with mitochondrial membranes and enhances their stability under stress (Birk et al., 2025). Unlike peptides that act primarily as ROS scavengers, HDAP2 is designed to support mitochondrial membrane architecture during injury.

While detailed biochemical characterization of HDAP2-cardiolipin interactions has been described elsewhere (Birk et al., 2025), the current study focuses on therapeutic efficacy and safety in the optic nerve crush (ONC) model. We administered 3 mg/kg/day HDAP2 intraperitoneally (IP), well below the toxic range, to test the ability of HDAP2 to prevent RGC loss in vivo after ONC. We quantified RGC survival using both absolute densities and RBPMS:ChAT ratios and used transmission electron microscopy to determine whether HDAP2 reduces mitochondrial loss within injured optic nerve axons.

Experimental Procedures

Peptide synthesis and structure

We designed a novel, high-density aromatic peptide (HDAP2; Biotin-dArg-Phe-Phe-dArg-amide) to support mitochondria under conditions of cellular stress. HDAP2 was synthesized commercially (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA) and consists of D-arginines flanking a Phe-Phe dipeptide core, amidated at the C-terminus, and biotinylated at the N-terminus for detection. The peptide binds cardiolipin on the inner mitochondrial membrane and, in cultured cells, supported mitochondrial potential during serum starvation and conditions of elevated oxidative stress (Birk et al., 2025). Peptide structure was verified by HPLC, and mass spectrometry confirmed that purity exceeded 96%. The peptide is patented through the Research Foundation of the City University of New York.

Animal procedures

We studied C57BL/6 mice (2–6 months, both sexes) that were bred and housed at York College, CUNY. Mice were housed under standard laboratory conditions (12-h light/dark cycles) with food and water available ad libitum. All procedures were approved by the York College Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Protocol #R2–2023) and complied with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research and ARRIVE guidelines (Percie du Sert et al., 2020).

Altogether, 82 animals were used in this study to evaluate HDAP2 toxicity (n=48), uptake of HDAP2 in the retina (n=3), and to assess RGC survival and mitochondrial density following ONC (n=31). In the ONC groups, mice were randomly assigned to receive either HDAP2 (3 mg/kg/day, IP for 14 days, (n=17) or saline vehicle (n=14). All ONC animals underwent unilateral ONC with the contralateral eye used as an uninjured control. An additional 14 animals received either HDAP2 (n=8) or saline vehicle (n=6) without ONC to serve as uninjured controls for establishing baseline RGC densities and RBPMS:ChAT ratios, and to verify that HDAP2 exposure alone does not affect RGC survival in the absence of injury.

Toxicity evaluation of HDAP2

We assessed the safety of HDAP2 in C57BL/6J mice (2–6 months, both sexes). Animals received daily injections of the peptide at fixed doses for 14 days. Groups with fixed doses were used to determine the LD50 and the maximum tolerated dose (Table 1). Animals were observed twice a day for body weight loss (>10%), behavioral alterations (grooming, exploration), sedation, seizure activity and death. Negative effects were rated on a 0–5 scale in accord with the OECD Test Guideline 425 (OECD, 2022): 0 = no observable effect; 1 = sedation <60 min; 2 = sedation 60–180 min; 3= sedation >180 min; 4 = generalized seizure; 5 = death. Toxicity values were determined using Kaplan–Meier survival and toxicity curves. LD50 values were calculated with nonlinear regression for 14 days of survival. Composite toxicity scores were calculated for each animal by day, normalized to the survival interval, and then averaged by cohort. LD50 values were determined by nonlinear regression using mean toxicity scores for each dose group. All tests were two-tailed and significance was accepted when p < 0.05.

Table 1.

HDAP2 Dosing Schedule for Toxicity Assessment

Cohort HDAP2 dose (mg/kg/day) N (mice)
1 3 8
2 10 8
3 30 8
4 50 6
5 100 6
6 300 4

Distribution of HDAP2 in retina

Prior to ONC experiments, we verified that biotinylated HDAP2 was colocalized with RGCs in the retina. Adult mice were injected with 50 mg/kg biotinylated HDAP2 (IP) reconstituted in saline and observed for 2 hours before euthanizing. This higher dose was used during initial toxicity assessment to maximize tissue concentrations of HDAP2 for immunodetection, as HDAP2 exhibits rapid cellular uptake and clearance kinetics. The therapeutic efficacy studies (described below) used a lower dose (3 mg/kg/day, IP), which was adequate to provide neuroprotective effects while still maintaining a wide safety margin (LD50 = 55 mg/kg). Subsequent work has demonstrated that this therapeutic dose is well-tolerated over extended periods (4× a week for 8 months) and achieves retinal bioavailability without adverse effects (MacNeil et al., 2025).

Eyes were marked to record orientation, and animals were euthanized with an overdose of ketamine (300 mg/kg) and xylazine (60 mg/kg) administered IP before removing each eye from the orbit with forceps.

Whole eyes were immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde reconstituted in either 0.1 M Tris or phosphate buffer (pH 7.3). After 10 minutes, the cornea, lens, and vitreous body were removed to ensure better penetration of the fixative into the retina, and the eyecups were returned to fixative for 1 hour. Following fixation, retinas in the eyecup were rinsed in buffer, cryoprotected in 0.1 M Tris or phosphate-buffered sucrose (10%, 20%, and 30%) prior to embedding in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) medium (Polyfreeze, Polysciences, Warrington, PA). Sections were cut at 14 μm thickness at −25°C using a cryostat (Leica CM3050S) and mounted onto gelatin coated slides.

HDAP2 uptake was visualized by incubating tissue overnight with Alexa Fluor-conjugated streptavidin (594 nm, 1:500, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA). Tissues were co-stained with antibodies for mitochondrial Cox4, RBPMS (RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing, which labels retinal ganglion cells), and glutamine synthetase (which labels Müller cells), as described below.

Optic nerve crush procedure

Adult mice (2–6 months) were anesthetized with ketamine (85 mg/kg) and xylazine (20 mg/kg) administered IP. The corneas were numbed with 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution (Falcon Pharmaceuticals, Fort Worth, TX), and animals were placed on their right side under a Nikon dissecting microscope with the head rotated so the snout was facing 2 o’clock, which allowed optimal visualization and access to the dorsomedial conjunctiva of the left eye.

The dorsolateral conjunctiva was cut with microdissection spring scissors, the intraocular muscles were separated, and the eyeball was slightly retracted to expose the optic nerve. Fine, self-closing forceps (RS-5027, Roboz, Gathersburg, MD) were used to clamp the optic nerve 1–2 mm behind the globe for approximately 3 seconds without applying additional tension (Kalesnykas et al., 2012; Tang et al., 2011). After the crush, the eye was repositioned within the orbit, the conjunctiva reflected over the extraocular muscles, and the incision covered with ophthalmic polymyxin B-neomycin-bacitracin ointment (3.5 mg/g, Bausch and Lomb, Bridgewater, NJ). The optic nerves from the contralateral eye were untouched and used as untreated controls.

Following the crush procedure, mice were given a subcutaneous injection of extended-release buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg, Ethiqua XR) for analgesia and placed on a heating pad until awake and grooming, at which point they were returned to their home cages. Half the animals were given HDAP2 immediately following the procedure and then daily thereafter (3 mg/kg, IP) for 14 days

Tissue collection and processing

To assess RGC survival and mitochondrial density in the optic nerve, animals were euthanized 14 days post-ONC with an IP overdose of ketamine (300 mg/kg) and xylazine (60 mg/kg). Each eye was removed from the animal with forceps and hemisected. For retinal analysis, whole eyes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 hour as described in the Immunohistochemistry section below. For mitochondrial analysis, optic nerves were transected at the optic nerve head and immersed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde, 2% paraformaldehyde until embedding for electron microscopy.

Immunohistochemistry

Fixed retinas were labeled with cell markers using conventional immunohistochemical protocols to identify cells and structures associated with HDAP2, and to assess retinal ganglion cell and starburst amacrine cell survival following optic nerve crush.

Retinas and sections were blocked and permeabilized with 4% normal donkey serum in 0.1 M Tris or phosphate buffer with 0.5% Triton-X for 1 hour, then incubated overnight (sections) or for 3 days (wholemounts) at 4°C with selected primary antibodies in 2% normal donkey serum in the same buffer. Tissue was rinsed 3 × 10 minutes with buffer and incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 hour at room temperature (sections) or overnight at 4°C (wholemounts).

Primary antibodies used were: rabbit anti-RBPMS (1:200; PA5–31231, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) to label all retinal ganglion cells; goat anti-choline acetyltransferase (ChAT, 1:100; AB144P EMD Millipore, Burlington, MA) to label starburst amacrine cells; rabbit anti-Cox4 (1:200; PA5–29992, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA ) to identify mitochondria; and glutamine synthetase (which labels Müller cells, 1:300, Invitrogen, # PA1–46165, Carlsbad, CA). Secondary antibodies used a donkey host and were conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488, 594, or 647 (1:500; Life Technologies Corp., Carlsbad, CA). To identify cell nuclei and delineate retinal layers, tissue was labeled with ToPro3 nuclear stain (1:1000; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 15 minutes. After staining, sections and retinas were rinsed in buffer and coverslipped with Vectashield mounting media (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA) to prevent photobleaching.

Imaging and data analysis

Control (contralateral, uninjured) retinas from both saline-treated (n=6) and HDAP2-treated (n=8) animals were analyzed as wholemounts to verify that HDAP2 does not affect RGC survival in the absence of injury, and to establish baseline regional RBPMS/ChAT ratios. Wholemounts were imaged using a Zeiss LSM 900 confocal microscope with a 10× objective by acquiring ~160 images (10% overlap) that were automatically stitched together using Airyscan processing. RGC counts of entire retinas were obtained using RGCode (Masin et al., 2021), to produce unbiased counts of RGCs.

RGC survival following ONC was assessed in 21 retinas (8 unoperated controls, 6 ONC untreated, 7 ONC + HDAP2 treated) with systematic sampling at 12 sites per retina for most animals (0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 mm from the optic nerve head in medial, temporal, dorsal, and ventral quadrants), yielding a total of 231 measurement sites. Retinal cells were imaged using an Olympus Fluoview 300 confocal microscope with an Olympus 40× oil immersion objective (NA 1.0). Laser intensity for the green channel was set at ~530V to enable comparison of RBPMS expression between treatment conditions.

In central regions, Z-stacks (1 μm steps) were collected through the ganglion cell layer to ensure imaging of RGCs above and below the middle focal plane, and through-focus projections were generated for cell counting. In midperipheral and peripheral retinal areas, single images were collected because ganglion cell layer cells were visible in a single focal plane. Each site was imaged separately using three wavelengths (488, 594, and 647 nm) and then merged in Photoshop to observe RGCs, starburst cells, and cell nuclei in the same fields.

For analysis of HDAP2 colocalization with Cox4, vertical retinal sections were imaged using confocal microscopy at 12-bit depth. A region of interest (ROI) was defined to include the inner plexiform layer (IPL) and ganglion cell layer, encompassing RGC dendrites and somas. Colocalization was quantified using Fiji/ImageJ with the Coloc2 plugin. Manders’ colocalization coefficients M1 and M2 were calculated at an intensity threshold of 30, which represented the fraction of HDAP2 signal overlapping with Cox4-positive regions and vice versa. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated for all pixels within the tissue ROI.

For analysis of HDAP2 colocalization with glutamine synthetase, retinal wholemounts were imaged at the level of the ganglion cell layer to visualize Müller cell endfeet. Images were acquired as 12-bit RGB TIFF files using confocal microscopy. Individual channels (cyan for glutamine synthetase, magenta for HDAP2-streptavidin) were extracted for analysis. Colocalization analysis was performed using custom Python scripts with scipy and numpy libraries. Binary masks were created using a threshold of mean + 1.5 standard deviations for each channel to identify positive signal. Manders’ coefficients were calculated using pixels above the 75th percentile intensity threshold for each channel. M1 represents the fraction of glutamine synthetase signal overlapping with HDAP2-positive regions, while M2 represents the fraction of HDAP2 signal overlapping with glutamine synthetase-positive regions. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated for all pixels within the image.

Labeled cells in each image field (350 μm × 350 μm) were counted manually using ImageJ (NIH) while blinded to experimental condition and used to compute RGC densities and RBPMS:ChAT cell ratios for each location and condition.

Optic Nerve Embedding and Transmission Electron Microscopy

Optic nerves were post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 30 minutes, dehydrated through a graded ethanol series (30%, 50%, 70%, 95%, 100%), and embedded in a 50–50 mixture of Spurr’s and EPON resins. Specimens were infiltrated with resin on a rotator at room temperature for 24 hours. Polymerization was performed in a 60°C oven for 18 hours. Ultrathin cross-sections were cut on a Leica Ultracut ultramicrotome at a thickness of 60 nm, mounted on 200-mesh copper grids, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and imaged at 80 kV using a Hitachi HT7800 transmission electron microscope. For each nerve (n=3 for each condition), 10 regions were imaged at 10,000 × magnification to count axons. Mitochondria within these fields were subsequently imaged at 50,000× magnification for detailed morphological assessment. Two investigators, blinded to the experimental condition, independently counted mitochondria to quantify mitochondrial density and morphology. Mitochondria were assessed using a 4-point quality grading scale: 1= inner and outer membranes were visible; cristae occupied 75 to 100% of the mitochondrial matrix; 2 = inner and outer membranes were visible; cristae occupied 50–74% of the mitochondrial matrix; 3 = membranes intact, noticeable reduction in cristae density 25–49 %, 4 = disrupted membranes, few or absent cristae.

Statistical analysis

Retinal ganglion cell survival was evaluated using both absolute RGC densities and RBPMS/ChAT ratios. Total RGC counts from control wholemounts were compared between saline-treated and HDAP2-treated groups using Welch’s t-test and effect size was quantified using Cohen’s d.

Regional RBPMS/ChAT ratios across central, midperipheral, and peripheral retinal thirds from control animals (n=14) were analyzed using Friedman tests (non-parametric repeated measures) to assess for changes in ratios with retinal eccentricity.

For ONC experiments, statistical analyses were performed using mixed-effects linear models to account for repeated measurements within animals (multiple retinal regions per animal). Models were fitted using restricted maximum likelihood (REML) with animal ID as a random grouping variable. Sample sizes were: Control n=8 animals (27 observations), ONC n=6 animals (23 observations), ONC+HDAP2 n=7 animals (27 observations), for a total of 21 animals and 231 retinal sampling sites. Models included fixed effects for treatment (Control, ONC, ONC+HDAP2) and retinal region (center, midperiphery, periphery), along with their interaction term, and random intercepts for animals to account for within-animal correlation. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons were performed using z-tests on model coefficients, with p-values reported without adjustment given the a priori hypothesis-driven nature of the comparisons. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.

ChAT+ amacrine cell densities were analyzed using the same mixed-effects modeling approach to verify stability of the internal reference population across treatment conditions.

RGC densities in tables were calculated from mean RGC counts in 350 × 350 μm fields and converted to densities (cells/mm2) by multiplying by 1/(0.35 × 0.35) = 8.16. This allowed direct comparison with published data on RGC densities in mouse retinas.

Mitochondrial density and morphology grades were independently assessed by two investigators who were blinded to experimental condition. Inter-rater reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient ICC = 0.730, Pearson r = 0.895), and consensus values (average of both investigators) were used for all analyses. For each image, mitochondrial density was calculated as the number of mitochondria divided by the number of axons. Image-level densities were then averaged within each animal to obtain animal-level means (n=3 animals per group, 10 images per animal). Given the small sample size and hierarchical data structure, animal level means were used as the unit of analysis. Statistical comparisons among groups were performed using Kruskal-Wallis test, with effect sizes calculated as Cohen’s d to quantify the magnitude of differences between groups.

Similarly, mitochondrial quality scores were calculated for each animal by averaging scores from all mitochondria assessed within that animal’s optic nerve samples, and these animal-level means (n=3 per group) were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

TEM analysis used n=3 animals per group based on the following considerations: (1) each animal contributed 10 image fields, yielding 30 images per group for substantial technical replication; (2) two investigators independently assessed all images with excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.730, Pearson r = 0.895); (3) large effect sizes were observed for mitochondrial density (Cohen’s d = 2.08 for ONC+HDAP2 vs ONC; d = 5.70 for Control vs ONC), which provide confidence in the biological significance of findings despite modest sample size; and (4) resource constraints for TEM processing necessitated focused sampling, though consistency across multiple outcome measures (mitochondrial density, axon counts, RGC survival, mitochondrial morphology) strengthens confidence in the findings.

Data throughout are presented as mean ± SEM. Post-hoc power calculations confirmed adequate statistical power (1-β > 0.8) for detecting treatment effects on RBPMS/ChAT ratios at each retinal region; power analyses were not applied to TEM outcomes, which were evaluated based on animal-level averaging, effect sizes, blinded scoring, and convergence across endpoints. All statistical analyses were performed using the statsmodels package (v0.14.0) and scipy.stats in Python v3.12, with significance defined as p < 0.05.

Results

HDAP2 is well tolerated at therapeutic concentrations

Toxicity testing showed a clear dose-dependent relationship between HDAP2 exposure and survival (Figure 1A). At the highest dose (300mg/kg, not shown), animals developed fulminant seizures and died within minutes. Doses of 100 mg/kg were also acutely lethal, and produced rapid sedation, seizure and death within 30 minutes. Intermediate doses of 50 mg/kg were better tolerated intitially, but all animals in this group died by day 9 of the 14-day treatment protocol. In contrast, mice treated with lower doses (3 to 10 mg/kg), tolerated daily injections for the full 14-day period with 100% survival. Animals in these lower dose groups maintained normal body weight and exhibited no behavioral abnormalities, indicating good overall tolerance to repeated systemic administration.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

HDAP2 toxicity assessment and dose-response relationships

A. Kaplan–Meier survival curves of fixed-dose groups for intraperitoneal administration of HDAP2 (10–100 mg/kg/day for 14 days; n = 4–8 per group). Doses ≥100 mg/kg were acutely lethal, while doses below 30 mg/kg were tolerated with 100% survival.

B. Dose–response curve for toxicity score indicates an LD50 of 59 mg/kg. Animals receiving <30 mg/kg exhibited no adverse side effects such as death, seizure, sedation or alterations in behavior (i.e. grooming, exploration) and body weight.

C. Dose–response curve for survival of fixed-dose groups for the 14-day treatment protocol indicates an LD50 of 52 mg /kg.

Data are presented as mean ± SEM unless otherwise indicated; P < 0.05 versus 3 mg/kg group (log-rank test for survival analysis).

Quantitative assessment of toxicity scores yielded an LD50 of 55 mg/kg (95% CI: 46–59 mg/kg; Figure 1BC). Kaplan-Meier survival curves produced a similar estimate of ~59 mg/kg. Based on these findings, the maximal tolerated dose for HDAP2 was established at 30 mg/kg. All ONC experiments used 3 mg/kg/day, well below the established toxic range.

Distribution of HDAP2 peptide in the retina

To determine whether HDAP2 reaches retina neurons after systemic administration, we examined vertical sections and wholemounts from saline- and HDAP2-injected animals. Endogenous biotin produced faint streptavidin labeling in saline controls, with no detectable signal in RBPMS-positive RGCs (Figure 2A). In contrast, animals injected with 50 mg/kg HDAP2 showed strong streptavidin labeling throughout the ganglion cell layer, IPL, OPL, and photoreceptor inner segments (not shown) (Figure 2B). Labeling within RBPMS-positive cells displayed a perinuclear pattern with exclusion from nuclei, consistent with mitochondrial localization.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

HDAP2 distribution and colocalization with RGCs, mitochondria, and Müller cells

Representative retinal images showing the distribution of endogenous biotin (A, middle panel) and biotinylated HDAP2 (B-D, middle panels) identified with Alexa Fluor 594-congugated streptavidin (magenta) in saline-injected (A) and HDAP2-injected Control retinas (B-D). Sections and wholemounts were double- and triple-labeled with RBPMS (cyan, to label RGCs), Cox4 (cyan, to label mitochondria), and ToPro3 (blue, to label nuclei) to assess colocalization.

A. Minimal endogenous biotin labeling was observed in saline control tissue that did not overlap with RBPMS-labeled RGC somas (circles).

B. Streptavidin labeling in HDAP2-treated retinas was robust throughout all retinal layers as well as in RGCs, identified by the perinuclear pattern in RBPMS-positive ganglion cells (circles). Labeling was characteristically excluded from nuclear regions (visible as unlabeled, black holes), which is consistent with mitochondrial localization. HDAP2 labeling is also present outside RGC somas in the GC fiber layer, indicating likely presence in Müller cells.

C. Adjacent section co-stained with Cox4 (cyan, left) and streptavidin-Alexa Fluo594 (magenta, middle). The merged image (right) demonstrates extensive colocalization throughout retinal layers, including RGCs (arrowheads). Quantitative analysis within the ROI revealed Manders’ coefficients M1=0.774 and M2=0.649, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient r=0.172 (p<0.001), demonstrating substantial mitochondrial targeting in RGC compartments.

D. Wholemounted retina labeled with glutamine synthetase (to label Müller cells) and streptavidin (middle) to show HDAP2 colocalization with Müller cells (one example marked with asterisks, Manders’ coefficients M1=0.723 and M2=0.543, with a Pearson correlation of r=0.303 (p<0.001).

Retinal layers are labeled: GC, ganglion cell layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer. Scale bars: 50 μm.

To confirm mitochondrial targeting of HDAP2 following systemic administration, adjacent retinal sections were co-labeled with Cox4 and streptavidin. Quantitative colocalization analysis within the INL and ganglion cell layer revealed Manders’ coefficients M1=0.774 and M2=0.649 (Figure 2C), indicating that 77% of HDAP2 signal overlaps with Cox4-positive mitochondria, while 65% of mitochondria contain HDAP2. Pearson correlation coefficient was r=0.172 (p<0.001). Visual inspection of the two signals showed extensive overlap across retinal layers and within RGC somas (Figure 2C, arrowheads).

Additional labeling of wholemounts with glutamine synthetase demonstrated that HDAP2 also localized to Müller cells (Figure 2D). Colocalization analysis of HDAP2 with glutamine synthetase showed Manders’ coefficients M1=0.723 and M2=0.543, with a Pearson correlation of r=0.303 (p<0.001), indicating that 72% of Müller cell signal overlapped with HDAP2 and 54% of HDAP2 signal colocalized with Müller cells. Together, these experiments show that HDAP2 crosses the blood-retina barrier and distributes broadly to retinal neurons and glia, including localization consistent with mitochondria-rich regions.

HDAP2 does not alter RGC number or retinal organization in uninjured retinas

To assess potential off-target toxicity in uninjured tissue, we compared control retinas from animals treated with saline (n=6) or HDAP2 (n=8). RBPMS labeling showed normal RGC morphology and distribution in both groups (Figure 3A, top). Total RGC counts were comparable (saline: 49,830 ± 6,229 cells; HDAP2: 49,004 ± 6,074 cells; t(12) = 0.32, p = 0.757, Cohen’s d = 0.171; Figure 3B), and both groups displayed the expected center-to-periphery density gradient (central: 3,883 ± 60; peripheral: 2,295 ± 126 cells/mm2; mixed-effects model, p < 0.0001 for region effect).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

HDAP2 does not affect RGC counts in control retinas

A. Representative confocal images from peripheral retina showing RBPMS-labeled retinal ganglion cells (green) and ChAT-positive starburst amacrine cells (magenta) in control retinas (upper panels) and 14 days post–ONC (lower panels). In control retinas treated with vehicle control saline or HDAP2, RBPMS-labeled RGCs were indistinguishable in morphology and distribution to demonstrate that HDAP2 alone has no impact on normal retinal morphology or cell density. After ONC, many RGCs die in both HDAP2 and untreated conditions, but the patterns of ChAT labeling in the ganglion cell layer were unchanged. Scale = 50 μm.

B. Total RGC counts (RBPMS-positive cells) in control retinas from untreated (n=6) and HDAP2-exposed (n=8) animals. No significant (ns) difference was observed between the groups (t-test, p = 0.757).

C. Regional RBPMS/ChAT ratios across retinal regions for control wholemounts (n=14), pooled from both saline-control and HDAP2-control groups. Bar graphs show significant regional variation (Friedman test, χ2 = 6.14, p = 0.046), with ratios decreasing from central to peripheral regions. Individual data points represent individual animals. This gradient necessitates region-matched comparisons when analyzing RGC survival after injury. *p < 0.05, ns = not significant.

D. ChAT-positive displaced amacrine cell densities across retinal regions, separated by treatment group (mean ± SEM). ChAT labeling shows the expected center-to-periphery density gradient (p < 0.0001, mixed-effects linear model) but remains stable across treatment conditions within each region (all treatment vs control comparisons, ns). ChAT-positive cells serve as a reliable internal reference population unaffected by ONC or HDAP2 treatment. Control (n=8 animals), ONC (n=6 animals), ONC+HDAP2 (n=7 animals). ns = not significant.

Because RGC densities vary regionally, we also examined RBPMS/ChAT ratios in control wholemounts. Starburst amacrine cells, which survive ONC (Berry et al., 2015; Jakobs et al., 2005), display relatively uniform ChAT labeling across retinal regions (Jeon et al., 1998). However, RBPMS/ChAT ratios were not constant across retinal eccentricity and showed modest but significant regional differences (Friedman test, p = 0.046) that decreased toward the periphery (central: 3.62 ± 0.06; peripheral: 2.67 ± 0.14; Figure 3C), which challenges the assumption that RGC:starburst ratios remain uniform across the retina (Jeon et al., 1998). This finding necessitated region-matched statistical comparisons for ONC experiments. ChAT+ displaced amacrine cells were stable across treatment groups (mixed-effects model, treatment effect: p > 0.3 for all regional comparisons) and retained their normal regional gradient (p < 0.0001; Figure 3D). These results confirm that HDAP2 does not affect RGC survival or starburst amacrine cell density in the absence of injury.

HDAP2 attenuates RGC loss following optic nerve crush

As expected, ONC caused severe RGC degeneration, with untreated animals losing 89.4% of RGCs by 14 days post-injury compared to controls (Table 2A, Figure 4A). Mixed-effects models that accounted for repeated measurements within animals revealed highly significant treatment effects (z = −31.42, p < 0.0001 for ONC vs Control; z = −30.65, p < 0.0001 for ONC+HDAP2 vs Control). Average RGC densities across all regions decreased from approximately 3,269 cells/mm2 in control retinas to just 446 cells/mm2 in untreated ONC retinas. In striking contrast, HDAP2-treated animals maintained significantly higher RGC survival, with densities of 629 cells/mm2, representing a 40.8% improvement over untreated ONC animals (p < 0.0001, Table 2A, Figure 4A).

Table 2.

A: Average densities (cells/mm2) of retinal ganglion cells.
Region Control ONC ONC + HDAP2 % Improvement* P-value **
Central 3883.0 ± 60.0 411 ± 18.0 591.0 ± 21.0 43.8% p < 0.0001
Midperipheral 3629.3 ± 130.2 523.9 ± 29.3 727.7 ± 35.8 38.9% p < 0.001
Peripheral 2295.4 ± 125.6 404.3 ± 28.9 567.2 ± 36.8 40.3% p < 0.001
Mean density 3267.9±52.5 446.1±58.6 628.2±54.2 40.8% p < 0.0001
B. RBPMS:ChAT ratios at different retinal eccentricities.
Region Control ONC ONC + HDAP2 % Improvement* P-value**
Central 3.620 ± 0.058 0.375 ± 0.021 0.573 ± 0.020 52.8% p < 0.0001
Midperipheral 3.496 ±0.149 0.494 ± 0.026 0.709 ± 0.034 43.5% p < 0.01
Peripheral 2.672 ±0.144 0.483 ± 0.029 0.705 ± 0.038 46.0% p < 0.001
Mean ratio 3.262±0.067 0.451±0.075 0.662±0.070 46.8% p<0.0001

RGC densities and ratios of RBPMS:ChAT labeling to assess neuroprotective effects of HDAP2 at 14 days following optic nerve crush (ONC). Table 2A reports absolute RGC densities (cells/mm2) across eccentricities. Densities were calculated by converting mean RGC counts per 350 μm × 350 μm sampling region to mm2 units. HDAP2 treatment significantly increased RGC survival in all retinal regions. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.

*

Percentage improvement was calculated as: ((ONC+HDAP2) − ONC)/ONC × 100.

**

P-values reflect post-hoc pairwise comparisons (ONC vs ONC+HDAP2) from mixed-effects models using t-tests on model-estimated means. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Table 2B presents RBPMS:ChAT ratios across retinal eccentricities (central, midperipheral, peripheral) in unoperated controls and in ONC retinas with and without HDAP2 treatment (3 mg/kg/day, IP for 14 days). Ratios were derived from mixed-effects model estimated means, with standard errors accounting for within-animal correlation. HDAP2 treatment significantly improved the ratio in all regions, indicating selective preservation of RGCs relative to the densities of ChAT-positive amacrine cells.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

HDAP2 treatment enhances RGC survival following optic nerve crush.

A. Retinal wholemounts labeled with RBPMS (green) to identify RGCs and choline acetyltransferase to label starburst amacrine cells (ChAT, magenta) from control, ONC, and ONC + HDAP2 treatment groups at 14 days post-injury. ONC induced extensive loss of RGCs compared to control retinas. However, HDAP2-treated animals (3 mg/kg/day, IP for 14 days) showed 40% greater RGC density compared to untreated ONC controls. Scale bar = 50 μm. Images are representative of n = 6–8 animals per group. All images were acquired using identical confocal settings (laser power, PMT gain, offset).

B. Analysis of absolute RGC density across retinal eccentricities showed that HDAP2 significantly increased RGC survival across all retinal regions: +43.7% (central, p<0.0001), +38.8% (midperipheral, p<0.001), and +40.4% (peripheral, p=0.01). Mixed-effects model revealed significant effects of treatment (z = −30.65, p < 0.0001), region (p < 0.0001), and their interaction (p < 0.01), indicating that protective effects varied somewhat by retinal location though protection was evident in all regions.

C. Analysis of RBPMS:ChAT ratios across retinal eccentricities showed statistically significant increases with HDAP2 treatment in all regions: +52.8% (central, p<0.0001), +43.5% (midperipheral, p<0.001), and +46.0% (peripheral, p<0.001). Mixed-effects model revealed significant effects of treatment (z = −26.58, p < 0.0001), region (p < 0.0001), and their interaction in peripheral retina (p < 0.0001), with similar patterns to the absolute density data. Error bars represent SEM. Data are from 6–8 animals per group, with most retinas contributing 12 measurement sites. ****p < 0.0001.

Qualitative assessment of retinal wholemounts revealed distinct differences in RGC populations across treatment groups. In control retinas, RBPMS labeling was robust across all regions, displaying the expected center-to-periphery gradient with highest cell counts centrally and gradual decline toward the periphery (Figure 4A, control). Following ONC, there was severe loss of RBPMS signal and dramatic reduction in surviving RGCs (Figure 4A, ONC). HDAP2 treatment did not prevent this overall pattern of degeneration, but preserved substantially more RGCs compared to untreated retinas (Figure 4A, ONC+HDAP2).

Quantitative analysis confirmed that HDAP2 provided consistent neuroprotection across all retinal regions. We assessed RGC survival using both absolute cell density measurements and RBPMS/ChAT ratios, which normalize RGC counts to the stable population of ChAT+ displaced starburst amacrine cells in each region (see Methods and Figure 3C, 3D). Both measures revealed the same pattern of robust protection.

Regional analysis using mixed-effects models revealed significant Treatment × Region interactions (p < 0.01), indicating that while HDAP2 provided protection across all retinal regions, the magnitude of this effect varied topographically. In the central retina, HDAP2-treated animals retained 590 ± 26 cells/mm2 compared to 410 ± 18 cells/mm2 in untreated ONC retinas, which represented a 43.7% increase in RGC density (p<0.0001). This corresponded to a 52.8% improvement in the RBPMS/ChAT ratio, increasing from 0.375 ± 0.021 to 0.573 ± 0.020 (p<0.0001; Tables 2A, 2B).

The midperipheral region showed similarly robust protection, with HDAP2 treatment yielding 38.8% higher cell density (728 ± 36 vs. 524 ± 29 cells/mm2, p<0.001) and 43.5% higher RBPMS/ChAT ratios (0.709 ± 0.034 vs. 0.494 ± 0.026, p<0.001). In the peripheral retina, HDAP2 treatment resulted in 40.4% increased density (567 ± 37 vs. 404 ± 29 cells/mm2, p<0.001) and 46.0% higher ratios (0.705 ± 0.038 vs. 0.483 ± 0.029, p<0.001). All regional comparisons demonstrated statistically significant differences (Figure 4B, 4C; Tables 2A, 2B), establishing that HDAP2 significantly attenuates RGC loss following optic nerve injury across the entire retina.

HDAP2 reduces mitochondrial loss and axonal degeneration in the optic nerve

To determine whether HDAP2’s neuroprotective effects involved protection of axons and preservation of mitochondrial populations, we quantified mitochondrial density and morphology in optic nerve cross-sections using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Untreated crushed nerves were fewer in axon number, with surviving axons showing extensive ultrastructural damage characteristic of axonal degeneration, including myelin unwinding, disorganization of neurofilaments and microtubules, and electron-dense axoplasm (Figure 5A, middle panel). Moreover, these axons exhibited severe loss of mitochondria (Figure 5C), with mitochondrial density reduced by 78% compared to uninjured controls (0.037 ± 0.013 vs. 0.169 ± 0.013, mean ± SEM, n=3 animals per group; Kruskal-Wallis H(2) = 6.49, p = 0.039, Cohen’s d = 5.70; Figure 5D) and many images from untreated crushed nerves containing no visible mitochondria (37% of images vs. 0% in controls). When mitochondria were identified, they had recognizable morphology, even when the nerve itself appeared to show characteristics of neurodegeneration (Figure 5A, middle panel; Figure 5E).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

HDAP2 preserves axonal mitochondria following optic nerve crush

A. Representative transmission electron micrographs of optic nerve cross-sections 14 days post-injury. Upper panels: axonal cross-sections showing mitochondrial distribution (50,000×). Lower panels: individual mitochondria enlarged to demonstrate cristae preservation and membrane integrity. Note that while mitochondrial morphology appears intact in HDAP2-treated axons, the surrounding axoplasm in ONC nerves (both treated and untreated) appears more electron dense than in uninjured controls, consistent with ongoing axonal degeneration. Scale bars = 500 nm

B. Total axons were quantified across all images. Bars represent average regional counts from 30 images per condition (10 images per animal, 3 animals per group).

C. Total numbers of mitochondria were counted across all images. Bars represent average regional counts from 30 images per condition (10 images per animal, 3 animals per group).

D. Mitochondrial density per axon by treatment group. Each data point represents one animal (n=3 per group), with animal used as the experimental unit to avoid pseudo-replication from multiple images within the same animal. Values were calculated as the mean mitochondrial density across 10 TEM images per animal. Bars show group mean ± SEM. Groups differed significantly (Kruskal-Wallis H(2) = 6.49, p = 0.039). Effect sizes: Control vs ONC, Cohen’s d = 5.70; Control vs ONC+HDAP2, d = 1.94; ONC vs ONC+HDAP2, d = 2.08. HDAP2 treatment preserved mitochondrial density at approximately 62% of control levels, representing 2.8-fold higher density than untreated ONC.

E. Mitochondrial morphology grade (1=best preservation, 4=severe damage). Each point represents one animal (average of all scored mitochondria per nerve: Control n=196, ONC n=28, ONC+HDAP2 n=109 total mitochondria). Bars show group mean ± SEM (n=3 animals per group). No significant difference in morphology quality among groups (Kruskal-Wallis H(2) = 0.62, p = 0.10), indicating that HDAP2 prevents mitochondrial loss rather than rescuing damaged organelles.

In contrast, HDAP2-treated nerves exhibited a numerically higher axon count (1034 vs 867 axons across all images, Figure 5B) however, this difference did not reach statistical significance and is presented as a descriptive measure. While HDAP2-treated axons also exhibited signs of injury-related degeneration, healthy-appearing axons with preserved mitochondrial populations and relatively intact ultrastructure were consistently present throughout the nerve, unlike untreated ONC nerves where such preserved axons were rarely observed (Figure 5A, right panel). Mitochondrial density in HDAP2-treated crushed nerves was 0.105 ± 0.023, which represented a 2.8-fold higher density than vehicle-treated crush and was approximately 62% of uninjured control levels (Figure 5D), demonstrating a marked protective effect (Cohen’s d = 2.08 for HDAP2 vs. untreated ONC). This mitochondrial preservation occurred even in axons showing other signs of injury, suggesting that HDAP2 specifically protects mitochondrial integrity within a degenerating axonal environment.

Morphological analysis of surviving mitochondria revealed similar ultrastructural characteristics across experimental groups. Quality scores (1 = best preservation, 4 = severe damage) did not differ significantly among conditions: 2.18 ± 0.42 (control), 2.36 ± 0.19 (ONC), and 2.36 ± 0.28 (ONC+HDAP2) (Kruskal-Wallis H(2) = 0.62, p = 0.10; Figure 5E). These findings indicate that optic nerve crush injury drives mitochondrial loss rather than progressive degradation of surviving organelles, suggesting that damaged mitochondria are efficiently removed through quality control mechanisms such as mitophagy and that HDAP2 treatment preserves the population of functional, structurally intact mitochondria.

Discussion

Mitochondrial dysfunction is a major driver of RGC loss following optic nerve injury. In this neuroanatomical study, we found that the mitochondria-targeted peptide HDAP2 significantly attenuated RGC loss after optic nerve crush, improving survival by approximately 40% across all retinal regions. These findings were consistent across analysis methods, using both RGC densities and RBPMS:ChAT ratios, indicating robust treatment effects independent of regional cell density differences. HDAP2 also maintained substantially higher mitochondrial density in optic nerve axons after injury, demonstrating that its effects extend to the ultrastructural level. The therapeutic dose used here (3 mg/kg/day) was well below the maximal tolerated dose, which supports a wide safety margin for future translational development. Although the present experiments focused on the retina, the pathways involved, mitochondrial loss, axonal degeneration, and membrane destabilization, are shared across CNS projection neurons and may have broader relevance in traumatic axonal injury.

RGC survival following ONC

We evaluated the survival of RGCs by comparing the absolute densities of RGCs in HDAP2 and untreated conditions, as well as by analyzing ratios of RBPMS-positive RGCs to displaced starburst amacrine cells labeled by ChAT. The latter metric was useful for comparing cell survival of small populations that are independent of retinal eccentricity. Since starburst amacrine cells lack axons, they survive ONC and can be used as a stable internal control. Our analysis confirmed that the densities of ChAT+ cells remained stable across all treatment groups and retinal regions, with no significant differences between control, ONC, and ONC+HDAP2 conditions (all comparisons p > 0.3). Baseline RBPMS:ChAT ratios did however decrease from center to peripheral regions (central: 3.62, midperipheral: 3.50, peripheral: 2.67; p = 0.046), which challenges the assumption that these ratios remain constant across retinal eccentricities (Jeon et al., 1998). This regional variation necessitated region-matched statistical comparisons to accurately assess treatment effects.

Following ONC, we observed that HDAP2 treatment significantly improved RBPMS/ChAT ratios in all retinal regions. In central retina, the ratio increased by 52.5% in HDAP2-treated animals compared to untreated ONC controls, with similar improvements in midperipheral (43.5%) and peripheral (46.0%) regions (all p < 0.0001; Table 2B). These findings closely align with absolute density measurements, which increased RGC survival by 40–44% across all regions, to provide strong evidence for HDAP2’s neuroprotective potential. The consistency between these two approaches strengthens confidence in our results and demonstrates that the observed protection reflects genuine RGC preservation rather than methodological artifacts.

Regional Variation in RGC Vulnerability

The pattern of RGC loss following ONC was not uniform across retinal regions. Compared to control retinas, all regions experienced substantial cell death in ONC animals, but central retina showed proportionally greater loss (89% reduction from control) compared to peripheral regions (82% reduction). Central retina contains smaller RGC cell bodies with higher packing density (Dräger & Olsen, 1981; Jeon et al., 1998), which could potentially increase their metabolic demand per unit area. Under metabolic or ischemic stress, smaller axons with proportionally fewer mitochondria (Barron et al., 2004; Perge et al., 2009) may have limited energy reserves to sustain ATP generation, making them more vulnerable to energy failure and apoptotic signaling cascades (Kong et al., 2009). Additionally, central RGCs lie in closer proximity to the optic nerve head and crush site, where injury-generated inflammatory mediators and oxidative stress are most pronounced (Howell et al., 2011; Williams et al., 2013). Together, these factors may contribute to the greater vulnerability of central RGCs after ONC.

The patterns of regional protection may also depend in part on cells other than RGCs. Müller glia are critical providers of metabolic and trophic support to RGCs, such as with K+ buffering, glutamate–glutamine cycling, lactate shuttling, and antioxidant defense, and their function is highly reliant on mitochondrial integrity (Bringmann & Wiedemann, 2011). In contrast to RGCs, Müller cells are fairly evenly distributed throughout the retina (Wang et al., 2017). Consequently, the RGC to Müller cell ratio is higher in the central retina and lower in the peripheral retina, which may place greater metabolic demands on centrally located Müller cells, and may contribute to regional vulnerability. Since HDAP2 is expressed in Müller cells (Figure 2D), stabilization of mitochondrial in glia may indirectly lead to support of RGCs, particularly in areas of high neuronal activity. A direct evaluation of mitochondrial support in glial cells will be important for understanding their contributions to RGCs under conditions of cellular stress.

Despite regional differences in baseline vulnerability, HDAP2 provided remarkably consistent RGC attenuation across all retinal areas, with survival improvements ranging from 39–44%. This uniform protective effect suggests that HDAP2 acts through a fundamental mechanism common to all RGC populations rather than by targeting cell-specific vulnerabilities (Catalani et al., 2023; Muench et al., 2021). HDAP2 likely stabilizes mitochondrial function and preserves bioenergetic capacity in stressed RGCs throughout the retina. This interpretation is supported by previous studies demonstrating that mitochondria-targeted antioxidants and peptides can preserve ATP production, reduce reactive oxygen species generation, and prevent mitochondrial membrane permeabilization, which are key early events in RGC apoptosis following optic nerve injury (Birk et al., 2013; Iomdina et al., 2015; Wu et al., 2019).

Maintenance of mitochondrial populations as a potential mechanism

The RGC preservation observed with HDAP2 treatment was accompanied by robust protection of axonal mitochondrial populations. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that ONC caused a 78% reduction in mitochondrial density, while HDAP2 treatment attenuated this loss, maintaining mitochondrial numbers at substantially higher levels. Morphological analysis revealed that surviving mitochondria maintained similar ultrastructural quality across all experimental groups, with no significant differences in cristae density or membrane integrity. This finding demonstrates that ONC triggers mitochondrial elimination rather than progressive structural degradation. HDAP2 prevents this loss by stabilizing membranes before injury-induced mitophagy removes them, preserving structurally intact mitochondria rather than rescuing damaged organelles. This scenerio aligns with prior reports that ONC and related optic neuropathies trigger mitochondrial dysfunction and selective degradation of damaged mitochondria via mitophagy or autophagic mechanisms (Kang et al., 2019; Muench et al., 2021). The ability of HDAP2 to counteract mitochondrial loss is consistent with its design to stabilize mitochondrial membranes and mitigate injury-induced organelle elimination (Catalani et al., 2023; Liang et al., 2024). These findings directly link mitochondrial population preservation to RGC survival and are consistent with HDAP2’s mechanism of binding cardiolipin to stabilize mitochondrial membranes and prevent their elimination (Birk et al., 2025).

Preservation of mitochondrial populations sustains critical neuronal functions. Mitochondria are essential for sustaining axonal ATP production, buffering intracellular calcium, and preventing oxidative stress–induced injury through maintenance of membrane potential (Nicholls & Budd, 2000; Schon & Przedborski, 2011). Disruption of these functions, including impaired ATP production, increased reactive oxygen species generation, and mitochondrial membrane permeabilization, represents a key early event in RGC apoptosis following optic nerve injury (Nicholls & Budd, 2000; Muench et al., 2021). By preserving mitochondrial density and integrity, HDAP2 directly interrupts this pathological cascade. This mechanism is consistent with other mitochondria-targeted therapeutic interventions that have shown neuroprotective efficacy in models of glaucoma and optic nerve injury (Nascimento-Dos-Santos et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2019; Tribble et al., 2021).

Recent work has identified mitochondrial fission in axons as a critical step in RGC degeneration following injury (Gómez-Deza et al., 2024). Excessive mitochondrial fragmentation can trigger mitophagy and contribute to bioenergetic failure in injured axons. HDAP2’s stabilization of mitochondrial membranes through cardiolipin binding may limit pathological fission events and preserve mitochondrial networks. This mechanism would be consistent with our observation that mitochondrial morphology remains relatively intact in HDAP2-treated nerves despite injury, while the primary effect is prevention of mitochondrial loss rather than rescue of damaged organelles.

While our study assessed a single timepoint and focused on anatomical rather than functional outcomes, these findings provide clear proof-of-concept for HDAP2’s neuroprotective and mitochondrial-preserving effects.

Future Directions

Several key questions remain for future investigation. Dose-response studies evaluating higher doses (5–10 mg/kg) are warranted to determine whether enhanced neuroprotection is achievable or if therapeutic efficacy plateaus at lower doses, as commonly observed with mitochondria-targeted compounds. Functional assessments, including electroretinography, optokinetic tracking, and visual evoked potentials, are essential to confirm that preserved RGCs retain visual function.

Mechanistic studies should elucidate how HDAP2 preserves mitochondrial populations, whether through membrane stabilization, inhibition of mitophagy, prevention of excessive fission, or enhancement of biogenesis. We have recently demonstrated that HDAP2 also provides neuroprotection in the DBA/2J chronic glaucoma model (MacNeil et al., 2025), to suggest that efficacy extends beyond acute injury to gradual degeneration. Given that mitochondrial dysfunction and axonal injury occur across CNS projection neurons, HDAP2 may have broader applications in traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, and other neurodegenerative conditions.

Highlights.

  • HDAP2 is a mitochondria-targeted peptide that supports mitochondrial membrane stability after axonal injury.

  • Systemic HDAP2 treatment improves RGC survival following optic nerve crush.

  • HDAP2 reduces mitochondrial loss in injured optic nerve axons.

  • TEM shows reduced ultrastructural axonal degeneration with HDAP2 treatment.

  • Findings support HDAP2 as a candidate neuroprotective therapy for CNS projection neurons.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ms. Karen Manifold for her expert care of the animals and Dr. Andrew Lesniewski for statistical consultation.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the PSC-CUNY (642000-00-52, MAM), National Institutes of Health (R16GM149428, MAM), Department of Defense HBCU/MI (W911NF-24-1-0322, VGM) and the Social Profit Network (AB).

Abbreviations

ATP

adenosine triphosphate

ChAT

choline acetyltransferase

GCL

ganglion cell layer

HDAP2

high-density aromatic peptide

INL

inner nuclear layer

IP

intraperitoneal

IPL

inner plexiform layer

IS

inner segment

LD50

mean lethal dose

NAD+

nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide

OCT

optical cutting temperature

OLS

ordinary least squares

ONC

optic nerve crush

ONL

outer nuclear layer

OPL

outer plexiform layer

RBPMS

RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing

RGC

retinal ganglion cell

ROI

region of interest

ROS

reactive oxygen species

SEM

standard error of measure

TEM

transmission electron microscopy

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The Research Foundation, CUNY has received a patent for HDAP2 therapeutic applications, with MAM and AB listed as inventors. At present, the patent holders have no financial holdings, licensing agreements, or commercial relationships related to HDAP2. SA and VGM declare no competing interests.

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the manuscript preparation process

Portions of this manuscript were edited and stylistically revised using Claude (Anthropic) to improve clarity, grammar, and consistency. All scientific content, data interpretation, and conclusions were developed, written, and verified by the authors, who take full responsibility for the content of the published article.

References

  1. Almasieh M, Wilson AM, Morquette B, Vargas JLC, & Polo AD (2012). The molecular basis of retinal ganglion cell death in glaucoma. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 31(2), 152–181. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Au NPB, & Ma CHE (2022). Neuroinflammation, Microglia and Implications for Retinal Ganglion Cell Survival and Axon Regeneration in Traumatic Optic Neuropathy. Front Immunol, 13, 860070. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.860070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barron MJ, Griffiths P, Turnbull DM, Bates D, & Nichols P (2004). The distributions of mitochondria and sodium channels reflect the specific energy requirements and conduction properties of the human optic nerve head. Br J Ophthalmol, 88(2), 286–290. 10.1136/bjo.2003.027664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berry RH, Qu J, John SWM, Howell GR, & Jakobs TC (2015). Synapse Loss and Dendrite Remodeling in a Mouse Model of Glaucoma. PLOS ONE, 10(12), e0144341. 10.1371/journal.pone.0144341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Birk A, Arain S, Musumeci D, Garcia-Marin V, & MacNeil MA (2025). Targeting high-density aromatic peptides to cardiolipin optimizes the mitochondrial membrane potential and inhibits oxidative stress. FASEB BioAdvances. 10.1096/fba.2024-00061 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Birk AV, Liu S, Soong Y, Mills W, Singh P, Warren DJ,…Szeto HH (2013). The mitochondrial-targeted compound SS-31 re-energizes ischemic mitochondria by interacting with cardiolipin. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 24(8), 1250–1261. 10.1681/asn.2012121216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bossy-Wetzel E, Newmeyer DD, & Green DR (1998). Mitochondrial cytochrome c release in apoptosis occurs upstream of DEVD-specific caspase activation and independently of mitochondrial transmembrane depolarization. Embo j, 17(1), 37–49. 10.1093/emboj/17.1.37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bringmann A, & Wiedemann P (2011). Müller Glial Cells in Retinal Disease. Ophthalmologica, 227(1). 10.1159/000328979 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bristow EA, Griffiths PG, Andrews RM, Johnson MA, & Turnbull DM (2002). The distribution of mitochondrial activity in relation to optic nerve structure. Arch Ophthalmol, 120(6), 791–796. 10.1001/archopht.120.6.791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Catalani E, Brunetti K, Del Quondam S, & Cervia D (2023). Targeting Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress to Prevent the Neurodegeneration of Retinal Ganglion Cells. Antioxidants (Basel), 12(11). 10.3390/antiox12112011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Constance JE, & Lim CS (2012). Targeting malignant mitochondria with therapeutic peptides. Ther Deliv, 3(8), 961–979. 10.4155/tde.12.75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Crish SD, Sappington RM, Inman DM, Horner PJ, & Calkins DJ (2010). Distal axonopathy with structural persistence in glaucomatous neurodegeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107(11), 5196–5201. 10.1073/pnas.0913141107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dräger UC, & Olsen JF (1981). Ganglion cell distribution in the retina of the mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 20(3), 285–293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Faits MC, Zhang C, Soto F, & Kerschensteiner D (2016). Dendritic mitochondria reach stable positions during circuit development. Elife, 5, e11583. 10.7554/eLife.11583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gómez-Deza J, Nebiyou M, Alkaslasi MR, Nadal-Nicolás FM, Somasundaram P, Slavutsky AL,…Le Pichon CE (2024). DLK-dependent axonal mitochondrial fission drives degeneration after axotomy. Nat Commun, 15(1), 10806. 10.1038/s41467-024-54982-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hou M, Shao Z, Zhang S, Liu X, Fan P, Jiang M,…Yuan H (2022). Age-related visual impairments and retinal ganglion cells axonal degeneration in a mouse model harboring OPTN (E50K) mutation. Cell Death Dis, 13(4), 362. 10.1038/s41419-022-04836-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Howell GR, Macalinao DG, Sousa GL, Walden M, Soto I, Kneeland SC,…John SW (2011). Molecular clustering identifies complement and endothelin induction as early events in a mouse model of glaucoma. J Clin Invest, 121(4), 1429–1444. 10.1172/jci44646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Iomdina EN, Khoroshilova-Maslova IP, Robustova OV, Averina OA, Kovaleva NA, Aliev G,…Skulachev VP (2015). Mitochondria-targeted antioxidant SkQ1 reverses glaucomatous lesions in rabbits. Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition), 20(5), 892–901. 10.2741/4343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ito YA, & Polo AD (2017). Mitochondrial dynamics, transport, and quality control: A bottleneck for retinal ganglion cell viability in optic neuropathies. Mitochondrion, 36, 186–192. 10.1016/j.mito.2017.08.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jakobs TC, Libby RT, Ben Y, John S, & Masland RH (2005). Retinal ganglion cell degeneration is topological but not cell type specific in DBA/2J mice. The Journal of Cell Biology, 171(2), 313–325. 10.1083/jcb.200506099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jassim AH, Inman DM, & Mitchell CH (2021). Crosstalk Between Dysfunctional Mitochondria and Inflammation in Glaucomatous Neurodegeneration. Front Pharmacol, 12, 699623. 10.3389/fphar.2021.699623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jeon CJ, Strettoi E, & Masland RH (1998). The major cell populations of the mouse retina. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-21-08936.1998 [DOI]
  23. Kalesnykas G, Oglesby EN, Zack DJ, Cone FE, Steinhart MR, Tian J, Quigley HA, 2012. Retinal ganglion cell morphology after optic nerve crush and experimental glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci 53 (7), 3847–3857. 10.1167/iovs.12-9712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kang LH, Zhang S, Jiang S, & Hu N (2019). Activation of autophagy in the retina after optic nerve crush injury in rats. Int J Ophthalmol, 12(9), 1395–1401. 10.18240/ijo.2019.09.04 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kong GYX, Bergen NJV, Trounce IA, & Crowston JG (2009). Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Glaucoma. Journal of Glaucoma, 18(2), 93–100. 10.1097/ijg.0b013e318181284f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liang Y, Li Y, Jiao Q, Wei M, Wang Y, Cui A,…Li G (2024). Axonal mitophagy in retinal ganglion cells. Cell Commun Signal, 22(1), 382. 10.1186/s12964-024-01761-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. MacNeil MA, Mentor W, Birk A, 2025. Mitochondrial-Targeted HDAP2 Preserves Retinal Ganglion Cells and Increases Pressure Tolerance in DBA/2J Mice. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci 66 (15). 10.1167/iovs.66.15.66. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Masin L, Claes M, Bergmans S, Cools L, Andries L, Davis BM,…De Groef L (2021). A novel retinal ganglion cell quantification tool based on deep learning. Sci Rep, 11(1), 702. 10.1038/s41598-020-80308-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Muench NA, Patel S, Maes ME, Donahue RJ, Ikeda A, & Nickells RW (2021). The Influence of Mitochondrial Dynamics and Function on Retinal Ganglion Cell Susceptibility in Optic Nerve Disease. Cells, 10(7). 10.3390/cells10071593 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Murphy MP, & Smith RA (2007). Targeting antioxidants to mitochondria by conjugation to lipophilic cations. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol, 47, 629–656. 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.47.120505.105110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nadal-Nicolás FM, Sobrado-Calvo P, Jiménez-López M, Vidal-Sanz M, & Agudo-Barriuso M (2015). Long-Term Effect of Optic Nerve Axotomy on the Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 56(10), 6095–6112. 10.1167/iovs.15-17195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nascimento-Dos-Santos G, de-Souza-Ferreira E, Lani R, Faria CC, Araujo VG, Teixeira-Pinheiro LC,…Petrs-Silva H (2020). Neuroprotection from optic nerve injury and modulation of oxidative metabolism by transplantation of active mitochondria to the retina. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis, 1866(5), 165686. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165686 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nicholls DG, & Budd SL (2000). Mitochondria and neuronal survival. Physiol Rev, 80(1), 315–360. 10.1152/physrev.2000.80.1.315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nickells RW, Howell GR, Soto I, & John SWM (2012). Under Pressure: Cellular and Molecular Responses During Glaucoma, a Common Neurodegeneration with Axonopathy. Annual review of neuroscience, 35(1), 153–179. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135728 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Oshitari T, Yamamoto S, Hata N, & Roy S (2008). Mitochondria- and caspase-dependent cell death pathway involved in neuronal degeneration in diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol, 92(4), 552–556. 10.1136/bjo.2007.132308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Percie du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, … & Würbel H (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Perge JA, Koch K, Miller R, & of …, S.-P. (2009). How the optic nerve allocates space, energy capacity, and information. J Neurosci 29 (24) 7917 7928; 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5200-08.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ren J, Zhang S, Pan Y, Jin M, Li J, Luo Y,…Li G (2022). Diabetic retinopathy: Involved cells, biomarkers, and treatments. Front Pharmacol, 13, 953691. 10.3389/fphar.2022.953691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rodriguez AR, de Sevilla Müller LP, & Brecha NC (2014). The RNA binding protein RBPMS is a selective marker of ganglion cells in the mammalian retina. J Comp Neurol, 522(6), 1411–1443. 10.1002/cne.23521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Samuel MA, Zhang Y, Meister M, & Sanes JR (2011). Age-related alterations in neurons of the mouse retina. J Neurosci, 31(44), 16033–16044. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3580-11.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Schon EA, & Przedborski S (2011). Mitochondria: the next (neurode)generation. Neuron, 70(6), 1033–1053. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Schrier SA, & Falk MJ (2011). Mitochondrial disorders and the eye. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 22(5), 325–331. 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328349419d [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Skulachev VP, Anisimov VN, Antonenko YN, Bakeeva LE, Chernyak BV, Erichev VP,…Zorov DB (2009). An attempt to prevent senescence: a mitochondrial approach. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1787(5), 437–461. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.12.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Szeto HH (2014). First-in-class cardiolipin-protective compound as a therapeutic agent to restore mitochondrial bioenergetics. Br J Pharmacol, 171(8), 2029–2050. 10.1111/bph.12461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tang Z, Zhang S, Lee C, Kumar A, Arjunan P, Li Y, Li X, 2011. An Optic Nerve Crush Injury Murine Model to Study Retinal Ganglion Cell Survival. J. Vis. Exp 50. 10.3791/2685. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tribble JR, Otmani A, Sun S, Ellis SA, Cimaglia G, Vohra R,…Williams PA (2021). Nicotinamide provides neuroprotection in glaucoma by protecting against mitochondrial and metabolic dysfunction. Redox Biology, 43, 101988. 10.1016/j.redox.2021.101988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang B, Huang M, Shang D, Yan X, Zhao B, & Zhang X (2021). Mitochondrial Behavior in Axon Degeneration and Regeneration. Front Aging Neurosci, 13, 650038. 10.3389/fnagi.2021.650038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang J, O’Sullivan ML, Mukherjee D, Puñal VM, Farsiu S, & Kay JN (2017). Anatomy and spatial organization of Müller glia in mouse retina. J Comp Neurol, 525(8), 1759–1777. 10.1002/cne.24153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wilkison SJ, Bright CL, Vancini R, Song DJ, Bomze HM, & Cartoni R (2021). Local Accumulation of Axonal Mitochondria in the Optic Nerve Glial Lamina Precedes Myelination. Front Neuroanat, 15, 678501. 10.3389/fnana.2021.678501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Williams PA, Harder JM, Foxworth NE, Cochran KE, Philip VM, Porciatti V,…John SW (2017). Vitamin B(3) modulates mitochondrial vulnerability and prevents glaucoma in aged mice. Science, 355(6326), 756–760. 10.1126/science.aal0092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Williams PA, Thirgood RA, Oliphant H, Frizzati A, Littlewood E, Votruba M,…Morgan JE (2013). Retinal ganglion cell dendritic degeneration in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of Aging, 34(7), 1799–1806. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Williams PR, Benowitz LI, Goldberg JL, & He Z (2020). Axon Regeneration in the Mammalian Optic Nerve. Annu Rev Vis Sci, 6, 195–213. 10.1146/annurev-vision-022720-094953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wu X, Pang Y, Zhang Z, Li X, Wang C, Lei Y,…Ye J (2019). Mitochondria-targeted antioxidant peptide SS-31 mediates neuroprotection in a rat experimental glaucoma model. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica, 51(4), 411–421. 10.1093/abbs/gmz020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES