Skip to main content
NCBI home page
EFSA Journal logoLink to EFSA Journal
. 2010 Jun 8;8(6):1632. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1632

Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pyridaben

European Food Safety Authority
PMCID: PMC13085152  PMID: 42006961

The content is available as a PDF (915.6 KB).

European Food Safety Authority ; Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pyridaben. EFSA Journal 2010;8(6):1632. [71 pp.]. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1632

Correspondence: praper@efsa.europa.eu

Published date: 8 June 2010

Question number: EFSA‐Q‐2009‐00788

On request from: European Commission

References

  1. Netherlands , 2007. Draft Assessment Report (DAR) on the active substance pyridaben prepared by the rapporteur Member State the Netherlands in the framework of Directive 91/414/EEC, March 2007.
  2. Netherlands , 2009. Additional Report to the Draft Assessment Report on the active substance pyridaben prepared by the rapporteur Member State the Netherlands in the framework of Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008, June 2009.
  3. Netherlands , 2010. Final Addendum to the Additional Report on pyridaben, compiled by EFSA, May 2010.
  4. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) , 2010. Peer Review Report to the conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pyridaben. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Guidance documents15.
  6. European Commission , 2003. Guidance document on assessment of the relevance of metabolites in groundwater of substances regulated under council directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/221/2000‐rev 10‐final, 25 February 2003.
  7. European Commission , 2002abc. Guidance Document on Terrestrial Ecotoxicology Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/10329/2002 rev.2 final, 17 October 2002.
  8. European Commission , 2002abc. Guidance Document on Aquatic Ecotoxicology Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/3268/2001 rev 4 (final), 17 October 2002.
  9. European Commission , 2002abc. Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/4145/2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. European Commission , 2001. Guidelines on comparability, extrapolation, group tolerances and data requirements for setting MRLs. SANCO Doc 7525/VI/95‐rev.7. pp.1–31.
  11. FOCUS (2001). “FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios in the EU Evaluation Process under 91/414/EEC”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001‐rev.2. 245 pp.
  12. FOCUS (2007). “Landscape And Mitigation Factors In Aquatic Risk Assessment. Volume 1. Extended Summary and Recommendations”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Landscape and Mitigation Factors in Ecological Risk Assessment, EC Document Reference SANCO/10422/2005 v2.0. 169 pp.
  13. FOCUS (2008). “Pesticides in Air: Considerations for Exposure Assessment”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Pesticides in Air, EC Document Reference SANCO/10553/2006 Rev 2 June 2008.
  14. FOCUS (2000). “FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios in the EU review of active substances”. Report of the FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios Workgroup, EC Document Reference SANCO/321/2000‐rev.2. 202 pp, as updated by the Generic Guidance for FOCUS groundwater scenarios, version 1.1 dated April 2002
  15. FOCUS (2006). “Guidance Document on Estimating Persistence and Degradation Kinetics from Environmental Fate Studies on Pesticides in EU Registration” Report of the FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics, EC Document Reference Sanco/10058/2005 version 2.0, 434 pp
  16. EFSA (2007). Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request from EFSA related to the default Q10 value used to describe the temperature effect on transformation rates of pesticides in soil. The EFSA Journal (2007) 622, 1–32 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. EFSA (2004). Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request of EFSA related to FOCUS groundwater models comparability and the consistency of this risk assessment of groundwater contamination. The EFSA Journal (2004) 93, 1–20 [Google Scholar]
  18. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development) , 2006. Guidance Document on Overview of Residue Chemistry Studies. ENV/JM/MONO(2006)32, 10 October 2006.
  19. SETAC (Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry) , 2001. Guidance Document on Regulatory Testing and Risk Assessment procedures for Plant Protection Products with Non‐Target Arthropods. ESCORT 2.

Articles from EFSA Journal are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES