Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1976 Jul;259(1):63–82. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011455

Dynamic properties of the responses of single neurones in the cochlear nucleus of the rat.

A R Moller
PMCID: PMC1309015  PMID: 957247

Abstract

1. The dynamic properties of unit responses to amplitude-modulated tones were studied using modulation with pseudorandom noise and described by cross-covariance and integrated cross-covariance functions between the discharge rate and the modulation. Under the experimental conditions used, these two functions are valid approximations of the system's impulse and step response functions respectively. 2. On the basis of their impulse response functions units could be classified into two groups, Type I with a low adaptation and Type II with a large degree of adaptation as well as a damped oscillation in their impulse response functions. 3. The response pattern of the Type II units is most likely the result of a negative feed-back striving to keep the discharge rate at a nearly constant level. 4. The cross-covariance functions are shown to remain unchanged during long duration recordings from the same unit.

Full text

PDF
65

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Enroth-Cugell C., Shapley R. M. Adaptation and dynamics of cat retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1973 Sep;233(2):271–309. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Moller A. R. Coding of amplitude and frequency modulated sounds in the cochlear nucleus of the rat. Acta Physiol Scand. 1972 Oct;86(2):223–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1972.tb05328.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Moller A. R. Statistical evaluation of the dynamic properties of cochlear nucleus units using stimuli modulated with pseudorandom noise. Brain Res. 1973 Jul 27;57(2):443–456. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90148-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Moller A. R. Unit responses in the cochlear nucleus of the rat to pure tones. Acta Physiol Scand. 1969 Apr;75(4):530–541. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1969.tb04409.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Moller A. R. Unit responses in the rat cochlear nucleus to tones of rapidly varying frequency and amplitude. Acta Physiol Scand. 1971 Apr;81(4):540–556. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1971.tb04931.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ratliff F., Knight B. W., Graham N. On tuning and amplification by lateral inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Mar;62(3):733–740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.62.3.733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ratliff F., Knight B. W., Toyoda J., Hartline H. K. Enhancement of flicker by lateral inhibition. Science. 1967 Oct 20;158(3799):392–393. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3799.392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES