Abstract
This series of four experiments sought to assess the comparative effects of multiple- versus single-ratio schedules on a pupil's responding to mathematics materials. Experiment I, which alternated between single- and multiple-ratio contingencies, revealed that during the latter phase the subject responded at a higher rate. Similar findings were revealed by Exp. II. The third experiment, which manipulated frequency of reinforcement rather than multiple ratios, revealed that the alteration had a minimal effect on the subject's response rate. A final experiment, conducted to assess further the effects of multiple ratios, provided data similar to those of Exp. I and II.
Full text
PDF![261](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff6b/1311130/cc87e87f68f1/jaba00078-0033.png)
![262](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff6b/1311130/c04a9fc5fb51/jaba00078-0034.png)
![263](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff6b/1311130/06bfef4b0ed5/jaba00078-0035.png)
![264](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff6b/1311130/9672800e0a52/jaba00078-0036.png)
![265](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff6b/1311130/8716add5145b/jaba00078-0037.png)
![266](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff6b/1311130/6d7d8597bd22/jaba00078-0038.png)
![267](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff6b/1311130/6e2e4b26fd0e/jaba00078-0039.png)
![268](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff6b/1311130/fc09b005306d/jaba00078-0040.png)
![269](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff6b/1311130/dc6be5baea07/jaba00078-0041.png)
![270](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff6b/1311130/a8e662374e86/jaba00078-0042.png)