Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1976 Summer;9(2):147–152. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-147

Decreasing fuel-oil consumption through feedback and social commendation1

W Burleigh Seaver 1, Arthur H Patterson 1
PMCID: PMC1311919  PMID: 16795518

Abstract

The energy crisis of the winter of 1973-74 led to severe shortages of fuel oil for home heating and a government request for voluntary conservation by the oil consumer. This experiment tested two methods of facilitating fuel-oil conservation. Home fuel-oil consumers were randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups: feedback of information on rate of oil use, feedback plus commendation for reduced consumption, or a no-treatment control. The consumption rate for the feedback plus commendation group was significantly lower than that of either the informational feedback group or the control group. The informational feedback group did not differ from the control group. The results suggest that feedback alone may not result in oil conservation, but that feedback combined with commendation can produce socially significant savings.

Keywords: fuel-oil consumption, commendation, consumer behavior, feedback, recording, measurement, humans

Full text

PDF
152

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burgess R. L., Clark R. N., Hendee J. C. An experimental analysis of anti-litter procedures. J Appl Behav Anal. 1971 Summer;4(2):71–75. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chapman C., Risley T. R. Anti-litter procedures in an urban high-density area. J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Fall;7(3):377–383. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark R. N., Burgess R. L., Hendee J. C. The development of anti-litter behavior in a forest campground. J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Spring;5(1):1–5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Everett P. B., Hayward S. C., Meyers A. W. The effects of a token reinforcement procedure on bus ridership. J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Spring;7(1):1–9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kohlenberg R., Phillips T. Reinforcement and rate of litter depositing. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Fall;6(3):391–396. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Powers R. B., Osborne J. G., Anderson E. G. Positive reinforcement of litter removal in the natural environment. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Winter;6(4):579–586. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES