Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2026 Apr 24:2026.04.21.719931. [Version 1] doi: 10.64898/2026.04.21.719931

PM2.5 toxin benzo[a]pyrene induces life-limiting inflammation and oxidative stress in the airway by up-regulation of TRPC6 and inactivation of β2AR/CFTR signaling

Hung Caohuy 1, Mungunsukh Ognoon 1,2, Tinghua Chen 1, Qingfeng Yang 3, Thalia Dib 1, Bette S Pollard 4, Naheed Fatima 1, Thomas Flagg 1, Dharmendra K Soni 1,5, Roopa Biswas 1, William Rittase 1, Oliver J L’Esperance 1, Sharon Juliano 1, Harvey B Pollard 1
PMCID: PMC13131649  PMID: 42079210

Abstract

Background:

Sustained exposures to high atmospheric levels of PM2.5 at population scale are associated with increased risks for pulmonary inflammatory diseases. These are marked by activation of the TRPC6 (Transient Receptor Potential Canonical type 6) calcium channel, increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidative stress. Long term exposures are associated with reduced life span, and increased incidences of cardiovascular diseases, dementia, Parkinson’s and Alzheimer disease, and increased risk of autism and autism spectrum disorders. It has been proposed that the PM2.5 toxin is benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) that is adsorbed to the surface of the PM2.5 particle.. But the mechanism by which B[a]P might drive pulmonary inflammatory diseases, or any other of the indications above, are not known.

Hypothesis:

B[a]P was recently reported to bind irreversibly and destructively to the β2 Adrenergic Receptor (β2AR) in the lung. We have therefore hypothesized that B[a]P is the adsorbed PM2.5 toxin, and that β2AR is the B[a]P receptor responsible for TRPC6 activation in lung epithelial cells.

Results:

To test this hypothesis, we exposed a polarized organoid model of normal human lung epithelia, polarized lung epithelial 16HBE14o- cells, and tracheobronchial slice cultures from ferret lung to either PM2.5 or B[a]P. We found that both PM2.5 and B[a]P: (i) irreversibly activated of β2AR signaling via Gi to PI3K/AKT; (ii) increased NFκB-activated release of proinflammatory cytokines through IKKαβ activation by PI3K/AKT, which was suppressed by the PI3K inhibitor LY 294002 (iii) desensitized and destroyed the activated β2AR receptor by endocytic recycling; (iv) also destroyed β2AR’s signalplex partner CFTR by the same process; (v) activated the CFTR-bound calcium channel protein TRPC6 due to loss of inhibitory CFTR; leading to (vi) increased cytosolic [Ca2+] concentration; (vii) increased ROS due to mitochondrial uncoupling; and (viii) increased expression of oxidative stress. Treatment with the TRPC6 inhibitor BI 749327 blocked steps (vi-viii), and preserved CFTR from endocytic loss. Treatment of tracheobronchial slice cultures of ferret lung with either PM2.5 or B[a]P resulted in increased secretion of IL-6, increased expression of TRPC6, and reduced expression of β2AR and CFTR. Finally, we found that exposure of lung organoids to B[a]P significantly reduced expression of the same five microRNAs (miR-126a-3p, miR-30b-5p, miR-103a-3p, miR-26a-5p, and miR-766-3p) previously identified in sera from service members exposed to PM2.5 from burn pit emissions during deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan.

Conclusion:

PM2.5 and the PM2.5 toxin benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) induce inflammation and oxidative stress in the airway by increased expression of TRPC6 and inactivation of β2AR/CFTR signaling. These discoveries mark the first identification of a mechanism by which exposure to PM2.5 or the PM2.5 toxin B[a]P itself can induce inflammation and TRPC6-dependent oxidative stress in lung epithelia.

Introduction

Exposure to high atmospheric levels of PM2.5 are associated with increased risks for inflammatory lung diseases, including asthma-like illnesses, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease (ILD), and pulmonary fibrosis (PF) [1–4]. Long term PM2.5 exposures are also associated with reduced life span [5, 6], and increased incidences of cardiovascular diseases [7–11], dementia [12–15]), and neurological disorders such as Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s disease [16, 17]. Reduced lifespan due to exposure to PM2.5 has recently been further characterized by measures of Premature Mortality (PM) and Years of Life Lost (YLL) [18]. Compared to ozone (O3) or NO2, PM2.5 was found to be the most significant contributor to PM and YLL. In addition, children exposed to high levels of PM2.5 during the first trimester of gestation are associated with increased risk of autism [19–21] and autism spectrum disorder [22, 23]. The culprit, PM2.5, is particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less, that is emitted by both high-heat cooking methods and large-scale incomplete combustion of organic and fossil fuels. The inhaled toxic threshold dose of PM2.5 is ≥ 15 ug/m3 [24]. In addition, the small size of PM2.5 means that when inhaled, it can penetrate deeply into the lung parenchyma [1]. There, most of the PM2.5 remains and contributes to lung toxicity [3], where it can induce: (i) inflammation by activation of NFκB signaling and cytokine production; (ii) increased cytosolic Ca2+ through the calcium channel protein TRPC6; (iii) mitochondrial dysfunction, involving uncoupling of Complex I and III in the electron transport system; (iv) generation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and mitophagy; and (v) oxidative stress, leading to DNA strand breaks, protein oxidation, membrane disintegration and cell death [6, 25–27]. However, a small fraction can also enter the blood stream through the alveolar-capillary barrier [1, 3], and thereby reach the heart [28], brain [29] and placenta [30]. Consistently, similar proinflammatory and oxidative stress consequences have been reported for the heart [31–33] and for the brain [34, 35]. Nonetheless, whether in the lung or elsewhere in the body, the mechanisms initiating PM2.5’s inflammatory and oxidative sequelae remain unknown, and the development of candidate therapies has therefore languished.

The core of the PM2.5 particle itself is amorphous silicon dioxide (SiO2), which has been classified by the FDA as GRAS, meaning Generally Recognized as Safe for inclusion in food. and as safe by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA: Code E551). When eaten, very little amorphous SiO2 enters the blood stream, and thus resembles dietary fiber [36]. Conceptually, plants contain up to 10–15% amorphous SIO2, which is why incompletely combusted organic matter contains this substance [37]. Experimentally, extraction of PM2.5 by sonication in aqueous buffers releases lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and other inorganic substances, including transition metals and heavy metals [38]. Thereafter, extraction with organic reagents removes toxic polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), leaving behind a benign residual particle [39]. Consequently, investigation has shifted to potentially toxic co-combustion products that are adsorbed to the surface of the PM2.5 core particle [40, 41]. Among these, it has been reported that an important PM2.5 toxin may be Benzo[a]Pyrene (B[a]P), a member of the class of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) which are emitted during incomplete combustion of organic matter [42]. In earlier studies, B[a]P was calculated to be responsible for up to 67% of the PAH-based toxicity associated with PM2.5 [43]. More recently, B[a]P has been described as “the most toxic combustion product of fossil fuels known to man.” [41, 44–46]. However, despite extensive evidence linking B[a]P exposure to pulmonary inflammation, the underlying mechanisms by which B[a]P engages intracellular signaling pathways remain obscure,

Given the lack of mechanistic insight, we speculated that B[a]P might exert its pathological influence through a receptor capable of triggering TRPC6 activation. One historical possibility was the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) [47]. As part of the conversion of B[a]P to the carcinogen benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide (BDPE), AhR binds B[a]P and transfers it to CYP1A1 or CYP1B1 isoforms of cytochrome P-450 in the liver and elsewhere [48, 49]. The BDPE product can then bind to DNA and promote mutagenesis, leading over the long term to lung and other cancers [50, 51]. But while carcinogenesis at population scale is a long-term effect which may be potentiated by chronic airway inflammation and oxidative stress, the PM2.5-dependent activation of proinflammatory NFκB signaling and oxidative stress in the lung appear to be a consequence of a shorter exposure time. Thus, the two effects may be related but are separated over time. However, it has also been suggested that AhR might also directly drive NFκB-mediated proinflammatory B[a]P toxicity [47]. Nonetheless, the data showing activation of NFκB signaling by a hypothetical B[a]P-AhR complex have been conflicting. For example, reports have shown that NFκB signaling increases, decreases, results in a different action [52], or has no effect, depending on specific types of cells [53–55]. Consequently, although AhR does bind B[a]P, the possibility of coincident crosstalk with an AhR-independent biology has been increasingly anticipated [56–58]. In addition, while some studies have shown increases in NFκB signaling, none have shown that a B[a]P complex with AhR can either increase TRPC6 expression or drive TRPC6-dependent calcium influx. Therefore, while it was clear that AhR does bind B[a]P, and does orchestrate important steps in carcinogenesis, it was also possible that there might also be another B[a]P interacting protein that was independent of AhR and activated TRPC6.

As an alternative candidate for the TRPC6-activating B[a]P receptor we have considered the beta-2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR), which was recently reported to bind B[a]P irreversibly to its catecholamine binding site [59]. Because B[a]P cannot dissociate from the binding site, B[a]P initially behaves as a super agonist. But, soon thereafter, a fraction of the B[a]P:β2AR complex begins to physiologically desensitize by undergoing endocytic recycling and destruction in the proteosome. Interestingly, in lung epithelial cells β2AR is bound to CFTR, the Cystic Fibrosis (“CF”) gene product, by means of a PDZ domain-mediated signalplex, which is linked together by the PDZ adaptor protein NHERF1 [60]. Native CFTR forms a dimer in the membrane and thus can bind at least two PDZ-containing protein ligands. For example, one of these could be β2AR, and the other could be TRPC6. When functional CFTR is missing, as for people with CF who have two disease-causing CFTR variants, the lack of functional CFTR results in (i) activation of proinflammatory TNFα/NFκB signaling and elevation of the cytokines IL-6 and IL-8 [61]; (ii) increased expression of the calcium channel protein TRPC6 that had been kept in an inhibited state in a signalplex with CFTR [62]; (iii) elevated cytosolic calcium from the TRPC6 channel [62]; (iv) production of increased ROS from distressed mitochondria; and (vi) a state of increased oxidative stress [63, 64]. Consistently, when CFTR is reduced in the larger population of people who have two functional CFTR genes, TRPC6 expression and TRPC6 channel activity are once again elevated, and cytosolic calcium concentration is chronically elevated [65]. In lung epithelia and other cell types, exposure to PM2.5 induces initial increases in cytosolic [Ca2+] from store operated Orai/STIM channels [66]. But subsequently much greater amounts of [Ca2+] enter the cytosol from outside the cell by activated TRPC6 channels [67–69]. In addition, bronchial epithelial cells respond to classical oxidants like H2O2 by reduction in CFTR and by robustly increased TRPC6 expression [69]. Thus, in the larger non-CF population, TRPC6 may mediate PM2.5-induced ROS and oxidant stress. Nonetheless, the mechanism by which PM2.5 activates TRPC6 is unknown. PM2.5 exposure has also been shown to elevate TRPC6 channel activity due to phospholipase C-dependent action on PIP2 and generation of DAG, although the initiating mechanism is also not known [70–72]. However, when excess β2AR agonist causes desensitization by removal of β2AR from the plasma membrane by endocytic recycling, CFTR channel activity is also reduced by ca. 60% [73]. Under similar circumstances, CFTR surface protein expression was reported to decrease by ca. 50% [74]. Thus, β2AR abundance may exert control over CFTR abundance at the cell surface. Consequently. CFTR loss could be involved in TRPC6 elevation in response to activation and loss of β2AR. Consistently, our initial preliminary data in a differentiated lung organoid model revealed that B[a]P, by irreversibly activating both Gs and Gi mediated β2AR activities, caused loss of both β2AR and CFTR proteins, loss of cAMP-activated CFTR chloride channel activity, and increased TRPC6 expression.

Based on these and other preliminary data, we have hypothesized that B[a]P is the adsorbed PM2.5 toxin, and that the B[a]P receptor responsible for TRPC6 activation in lung epithelial cells is β2AR. Thus, it is possible that the B[a]P-induced activation and then loss of both β2AR and CFTR, and consequent elevation of TRPC6, might explain the pulmonary pathology caused by PM2.5 exposure. To test this hypothesis we proposed to determine whether parallel studies of B[a]P and PM2.5 resulted in equivalent effects on lung pulmonary epithelial cells by: (i) initially activating the β2AR signaling pathway through the Gi protein to activate the proinflammatory [PI3K/AKT/IKKαβ/NFκB] pathway; (ii) thereby activating expression of cytokines IL-8 and IL-6, which could be blocked with the PI3K blocker LY-294002; (iii) reducing β2AR and CFTR protein expression over a 24 hour period; (iv) increasing calcium influx through TRPC6 channels following dissociation of TRPC6 from CFTR and by PLC-dependent production of DAG; and (v) and producing Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and oxidative stress which could be blocked by the TRPC6 inhibitor BI 749327. Based on the results shown below, we have concluded that the hypothesis is not disproved. These discoveries mark the first identification of a mechanism by which exposure to PM2.5 or the PM2.5 toxin B[a]P itself can induce inflammation and TRPC6-dependent oxidative stress in lung epithelia.

Results

B[a]P activates proinflammatory TNFα/NFκB signaling in airway epithelia.

To test if incubation of differentiated airway epithelial organoid cultures with B[a]P activated TNFα/NFκB signaling, we incubated BCi.NS1.1 (dBCi) cells differentiated in an air-liquid-interface (ALI) culture with different concentrations of B[a]P for 6 hours apically and extended incubation for additional 18 hours. As previously described [75], we then measured expression levels of a comprehensive set of proteins in the TNFα/NFκB signaling pathway which we expected to be elevated. Fig 1a showed that the concentrations of B[a]P chosen for the analysis, 0.1, 1.0 and 10 μM were not toxic to the cells. Fig 1b also showed that as the concentrations of B[a]P rose, expressions of IL6, IL8 and TNFα in the liquid subphase also rose. At the lowest 0.1 μM dose of B[a]P, only increases in IL-8 and IL-6 secretion were significant, while at 1 and 10 μM B[a]P all IL-6, IL-8 and TNFα were significantly and proportionately elevated. Finally, Fig 1c showed that as B[a]P concentration rose, protein expression also increased for TNFR1, TRADD, p-IKKBαβ, p-IκBα, p-NFκBp65 (serine 536), and p-NFκBp65 (serine 276). By contrast, non-phosphorylated substrate proteins, IKKαβ, IκBα and NFκBp65 were not significantly changed. These data thus showed that B[a]P was activating the classical activation pathway for NFκB. The B[a]P-dependent elevation of TRADD further established that B[a]P was dose-dependently elevating signaling specifically in the TNFα/NFκB pathway.

Figure 1. Effects of B[a]P on cell viability and cytokine secretion, and expression of pro-inflammatory signaling proteins in differentiated BCi.NS1.1 (dBCi) cells.

Figure 1.

(a) Cell viability was assessed with the MTT assay and data shown are means ± SD (n = 3). (b) TNFα, IL-6 and IL-8 expression in response to B[a]P exposure. (c) Representative Western blot images showing protein expression. All data were obtained from three independent experiments. Statistical p values were determined by a one-way ANOVA, followed by a Tukey post-hoc test comparing the B[a]P treatments to the DMSO control; * p < 0.05; ¥, p < 0.01; NS, no significance.

B[a]P reduces CFTR chloride channel activity and β2AR and CFTR protein expression

Using the Ussing Chamber method to measure cAMP-activated CFTR channel function, Fig 2a and Fig 2b showed that CFTR channel function, represented by short circuit currents (ΔIsc), were systematically and significantly reduced by increases in B[a]P concentrations. Western blots and densitometric analyses shown in Fig 2c and Fig 2d, respectively, showed that protein expression of both β2AR and CFTR were also significantly reduced by step-wise increases in B[a]P concentration. Finally, Fig 2e showed that there was a significant positive correlation between changes in β2AR and CFTR with a Pearson Correlation Coefficient (r) of 0.9948 (p= 0.005). Similar B{a]P effects were observed in polarized lung 16HBE14o-cells (see Supplemental Fig S1). Thus, over 24 hours of incubation, irreversible binding of B[a]P to β2AR results in loss of CFTR channel function and coordinated loss of both β2AR and CFTR proteins.

Figure 2. Effects of B[a]P on β2AR and CFTR in differentiated BCi.NS1.1 (dBCi) cells.

Figure 2.

(a & b) Representative Isc tracings of CFTR-dependent short-circuit currents (Isc) were measured in Ussing chambers. (c) Representative Western blot images of total cellular CFTR and β2AR expression levels in treated dBCi cells after Ussing chamber analyses in (a). (d) Densitometric analyses showing B[a]P-induced reduction of both β2AR and CFTR expression in a dose-dependent manner. (e) The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) showing a significant positive relationship between B[a]P-inhibited β2AR and CFTR expression. All data were obtained from three independent experiments. Statistical p values were determined with a one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey post-hoc test comparing the B[a]P treatments to the DMSO control; * p < 0.01.

PM2.5 and B[a]P increase cytokine expression and proinflammatory signaling

To test whether the parent PM2.5 exerted similar effects to B[a]P on lung epithelial cells, we subjected polarized 16HBE14o-cells to different concentrations of authentic PM2.5. The PM2.5 we utilized was ERM-CZ110 from Sigma-Aldrich (see Methods for additional details). We also included 10 μM B[a]P as a positive control. Fig 3a showed that the concentrations of PM2.5 chosen for the analysis, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 ng/ml, were not toxic to the cells. Fig 3b showed that as the concentrations of PM2.5 rose, expressions of IL6 and IL8 in the liquid subphase also rose. Finally, Fig 3c showed that as PM2.5 concentration rose, expression of both CFTR and β2AR progressively declined, as previously shown for pure B[a]P (Fig 2c & 2d) and in the 10 μM B[a]P positive control. PM2.5 was also found to significantly reduce cAMP-dependent CFTR chloride channel activity (see Supplemental Fig S2). Fig 3c also showed, as anticipated from initial activation of β2AR by the irreversible binding of B[a]P, that both the B[a]P positive control and PM2.5 increased p-AKT (ser 473) expression. In addition, proinflammatory p-NFκBp65 (serine 536) was elevated by both 100 ng/ml PM2.5 and the B[a]P positive control. Finally, we noted a progressive PM2.5-dependent increase in the calcium channel protein TRPC6 and for the B[a]P positive control. Normally, CFTR binds to and constitutively inhibits the TRPC6 calcium channel. However, in the absence of CFTR (vide supra) TRPC6 is activated and further expressed in the apical plasma membrane, thereby contributing to oxidative stress [62]. These data thus show that the effects of PM2.5 and the pure B[a]P are shared for (i) loss of β2AR and CFTR expression; (ii) activation of AKT; (iii) activation of proinflammatory NFκB signaling; and (iv) increased expression of TRPC6.

Figure 3. Effects of PM 2.5 on cell viability and cytokine secretion, and expression of pro-inflammatory signaling proteins in polarized 16HBE14o- cells.

Figure 3.

Cells were treated with various concentrations of PM2.5 for 24 hr. (a) Cell viability was assessed with MTT assay. (b) IL-6 and IL-8 from the basolateral sides. (c) Representative Western blot images showing CFTR, β2AR, phospho-AKT (Ser473), AKT, phospho-NF-κB p65 (Ser536), NF-κB p65, and TRPC6 expression. All data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 4). Statistical p values were determined with a one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey post-hoc test comparing the B[a]P or PM 2.5 treatments to the DMSO control; *, p < 0.05; ¥, p < 0.01; NS, no significance.

B[a]P induces endosomal loss of β2AR and CFTR

Plasma membrane proteins like β2AR and CFTR are continuously recycled by uptake into endosomes where the damaged proteins are retained and sent for disposal in lysosomes or proteosomes, and the fully functional proteins are returned to the plasma membrane [75, 76]. To test for whether the formation of irreversible B[a]P/β2AR complexes lead to endosomal loss of both β2AR and CFTR, we labeled both membrane-localized β2AR and CFTR with impermeant biotin, and followed the endosomal processing of both proteins. First, cells were treated for 6 hours with different concentrations of B[a]P and then were labeled at 4°C with impermeant Sulfo-NHS-SS-biotin. Fig 4a showed that following B[a]P treatment, the detection of surface-labeled biotinylated CFTR and β2AR progressively declined. To test whether B[a]P treatment resulted in both CFTR and β2AR being retained in intracellular endosomes, we pre-labeled cell surface β2AR and CFTR with impermeant Sulfo-NHS-SS-biotin at 4°C for one hour, and then incubated the labelled cells with different concentrations of B[a]P for 6 hours. Thereafter the remaining biotin on surface-localized CFTR or β2AR were stripped with glutathione (GSH), and the “damaged” endosomal biotinylated β2AR and CFTR that was protected within the cell were then identified by Western blot analysis. Fig 4b showed that as the concentration of B[a]P increased, progressively more biotinylated β2AR was retained in intracellular endosomes. Fig 4c showed the exact same relationship was found for CFTR. These data suggest the irreversible binding of B[a]P to β2AR may have initially resulted in activation of β2AR signaling [59]. But soon thereafter the classical desensitization process begins, extending for hours or days with sustained exposure [77]. Desensitization results in removal of β2AR from the plasma membrane, retention in endosomes, and eventual proteosomal destruction. We find here that CFTR is also removed from the plasma membrane by the same or parallel process, specifically involving proteosomal destruction (Fig 4d). Thus, the formation of the irreversible B[a]P/β2AR complex leads to activation of β2AR signaling, followed by endosomal loss of both β2AR and CFTR.

Figure 4. B[a]P induces loss of cell surface β2AR and CFTR expression by inhibiting endosomal recycling in differentiated BCi.NS1.1 (d-BCi) epithelia.

Figure 4.

(a) Representative Western blot images of cell surface CFTR and β2AR expression in cells treated with DMSO or various concentrations of B[a]P. (b & c) Recycling assay of endocytosis CFTR and β2AR were analyzed by Western blot. Representative Western blot images of biotinylated CFTR and β2AR expression are shown. Cell samples treated without or with GSH (lanes 1 and 2) were used as positive controls for biotinylation and GSH stripping processes, respectively. (d) A representative Western blot image showing ubiquitination of CFTR immunoprecipitates from cell lysates treated with different concentrations of B[a]P in the presence of 20 μM MG 132. All Western blot analyses represent the results of three independent experiments.

PM2.5 and B[a]P induce cytokine secretion by activating the PI3K/AKT/IKKαβ/NFκB pathway

As shown in Figure 2a, β2AR can couple canonically with GS proteins to activate adenyl cyclase, which then can activate protein kinase A to phosphorylate and activate the CFTR chloride channel [78]. However, β2AR can also couple non-canonically with Gi proteins by a pathway, modulated by sirtuins 1 and 3, that lead to activation of the [PI3K (phosphoinositide 3 kinase)/AKT (protein kinase B)/IKKαβ/NFkBp65] pathway [79]. Both PM2.5 (Fig 3c) and pure B[a]P (Fig 1c), can activate p-AKT signaling and p-NFkBp65 (Ser 536). Thus, B[a]P-activated β2AR may activate PI3K through Gi, and thus activate the remainder of the [PI3K/AKT/IKKαβ/NFκBp65] pathway. To test this hypothesis, we asked whether the classical PI3K blocking drug LY 294002, but not its inactive analogue LY 303511, could block B[a]P-activated cytokine expression by lung epithelial cells. Fig 5a showed that LY 294002 blocked B[a]P-activated secretion of IL-8 and IL-6, However, the inactive form LY 303511 was inactive. These data suggested that B[a]P could activate NFκB-dependent secretion of the cytokines IL-8 and IL-6 by activation of the [β2AR/Gi/PI3K/AKT/IKKαβ/NFκB] pathway. Equivalent experiments with PM2.5 treated cells, incubated with LY 294002 or the inactive analogue LY 303511 were also tested with similar statistically significant results (Supplemental Fig S3). Thus, B[a]P] can activate proinflammatory p-NFkBp65 signaling in two ways: (i) through irreversibly activating β2AR-dependent PI3K signaling, and (ii) by inactivating CFTR, thereby relieving inhibition of TRADD. Both pathways converge on IKKαβ to commonly phosphorylate IκBα and free p-NFkBp65 to leave the cytosol and seek out kB binding sites on cytokine promoters within the nucleus.

Figure 5: B[a]P induces cytokine secretion via the PI3K signaling pathway in polarized 16HBE14o-cells.

Figure 5:

(a) IL-6 and IL-8 from the basolateral sides of the ALI were determined using the DuoSet® ELISA kits. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 4). Statistical p-values were determined with a one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey post-hoc test comparing the all treatments to the DMSO control; ¥, p < 0.05; *, p < 0.01. (b) Representative Western blot images showing CFTR, phospho-AKT (Ser473), AKT, phospho-NF-κB p65 (Ser536), and NF-κB p65 expression in treated polarized 16HBE14o- cells in (a). All data were obtained from three independent experiments.

PM2.5 and B[a]P activate calcium influx through TRPC6 channels

As shown in Fig 3c, we also determined that PM2.5 exposure to lung epithelial cells induced elevation of TRPC6 expression. Therefore, to test whether exposure to B[a]P activated calcium influx through TRPC6 channels, we exposed cells to different concentrations of B[a]P for 24 hours, and then treated cells with calcium Fluo-4 AM. Changes in intracellular calcium concentration sere then measured following exposure to 1 mM extracellular calcium concentration. Fig 6a & 6b showed that after 24 hours of treatment a significant increase in intracellular calcium could be measured with 1 and 10 μM B[a]P. Fig 6c & 6d showed that B[a]P significantly and dose-dependently reduced CFTR and β2AR, and elevated TRPC6 expression. Equivalent results to those in Fig 6c & 6d were also found when performed with PM 2.5 instead of B[a[P (see Supplemental Fig S4). Fig 6e showed that when comparing loss of β2AR to increase in TRPC6, the Pearson’s r was −0.9875 (p = 0.01). Finally, to test directly whether calcium intake occurred through TRPC6 channels, we repeated the calcium measurement experiments in the presence of the specific TRPC6 inhibitor BI 749327. Fig 6f & 6g showed that BI 749327 significantly inhibited B[a]P-dependent calcium influx. Then, to test whether BI 749327 affected stability of CFTR following exposure to B[a]P, Western blot analysis in Fig 6h, prepared from cells in Fig 6f & 6g, revealed that BI 749327 significantly protected CFTR from loss due to exposure to B[a]P. Thus, stabilization of CFTR by the TRPC6 inhibitor BI749327 prevented B[a]P and PM2.5 from activating the TRPC6 channel. Altogether these data suggested that activation of TRPC6 channels by PM2.5 was due to the B[a]P adsorbed to the particle surface, and that the TRPC6 inhibitor BI 749327 was able to preserve the integrity of the complex between CFTR and TRPC6 from destruction by B[a]P.

Figure 6.: B[a]P induces calcium influx which is blocked by TRPC6 inhibitor BI 749327 in 16HBE14o- cells.

Figure 6.:

(a) Fluo-4-AM fluorescence intensity traces obtained 24 hours after treatment with B[a]P and stimulated with assay buffer containing 1 mM Ca+2. (b) Corresponding histograms summarize the mean changes in RFU (F1 – F0) after stimulation by 1 mM Ca+2. (c & d) Representative Western blot images of β2AR and TRPC6 expression levels in treated cell in (a) and respective densitometric analyses. (e) The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) showing a significant negative relationship between β2AR and TRPC6 expression caused by B[a]P treatment. (f) Fluo-4AM fluorescence intensity traces in 16HBE14o- cells were obtained before and after addition of 2 mM Ca+2 in the presence or absence of 5μM BI 749327. (g) Corresponding histograms summarize the mean changes in RFU (F1 – F0) after stimulation by 2 mM Ca+2. (h) Representative western blotting analyses of CFTR expression in corresponding treated cells. All data represent the mean of three independent experiments. Statistical p values were determined with a one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey post-hoc test comparing the B[a]P ± BI 749327 treatments to the DMSO control; ¥, p<0.05, * p < 0.01.

PM2.5 and B[a]P induce production of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and Oxidative stress.

By inducing Ca2+ influx through the TRPC6 calcium channel due to loss of CFTR control, and by availability of DAG from activation of the β2AR/PI3K/PLC pathway, we expected that increased ROS and oxidative stress might follow. To test this expectation, we treated cells with two incrementing doses of PM2.5, or one dose of B[a]P for 24 hr, and then assayed them for ROS, cytokine release and CFTR expression. We also included 100 μM H2O2 as a positive control for oxidative stress. Fig 7a showed that 50 and 100 ng/ml of PM2.5, or 10 μM B[a]P, or 100 μM H2O2, significantly increased generation of ROS. Fig 7b showed that IL-6 and IL-8 were significantly elevated in the same manner as increases in ROS. These results may therefore implicate the Nrf2/Keap1 redox signaling pathway in CFTR repression under oxidative conditions [80]. Fig 7c showed that CFTR expression was significantly reduced by exposures to both PM2.5 and B[a]P. The H2O2 positive control also significantly lowered CFTR expression, as expected from activation of the distal antioxidant element (ARE) in the CFTR locus [80].

Figure 7. PM 2.5, B[a]P and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) induce Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) production in polarized 16HBE14o- cells.

Figure 7.

Both apical and basolateral sides of polarized 16HBE14o cells were treated with DMSO, PM 2.5, B[a]P, or H2O2 (as a positive control for oxidation stress). After 6 hr incubation, treated media from the apical sides only were removed and replaced with HBSS buffer containing 10 μM CellROX Green, followed by further incubation for 18 hrs. (a) ROS production significantly elevated by all three analytes. (b) Measurement of IL6 and IL8 release in response to all three analytes (c) Representative western blot images of treated cell lysates showing significant losses of CFTR under these conditions. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 4). Statistical p values were determined with a one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey post-hoc test comparing PM2.5, B[a]P, and H2O2 treatments to the DMSO control; ¥, p <0.05; *, p < 0.01.

In vivo human exposure to PM2.5 and in vitro exposure to B[a]P significantly suppress the same five microRNAs

We previously reported that sera from service members exposed to PM2.5 from open air burn pits exhibited significant and specific reductions in five microRNAs [81]. These five reduced serum microRNAs were: miR 126a-3p, miR-30b-5p, miR103a-3p, miR26a-5p and miR-766-3p, which were identified from among 754 tested microRNAs by a Taqman-based assay. The samples were from pre- vs- post- deployment blood draws, and the controls in these studies were service members who had not been deployed. Levels of PM2.5 as high as 615 μg/m3 in burn pit emissions were documented as key exposure metrics in this exposed population [82, 83]. Sera from exposed service members were also reported to contain high levels of the B[a]P metabolite BDPE, thus indicating that they had been exposed to B[a]P in the PM2.5 emitted from the burn pits [84]. Consistently, high levels of B[a]P were also measured in serum that had been collected from the service members just after returning from deployment [85]. Therefore, to test whether these in vivo results could be replicated in vitro by exposure of the lung epithelial organoid to B[a]P, we incubated the apical and basolateral sides of differentiated BCi.NS1.1 organoids with different concentrations of B[a]P and used Taq-man Assays to measure microRNAs. Fig 8 showed that all five microRNAs were significantly and dose-dependently reduced by exposure to B[a]P. These data thus suggest that B[a]P effects on microRNA expression, in vitro, can parallel in vivo PM2.5 effects on serum microRNAs in vivo.

Figure 8. Alterations in miR expressions in response to B[a]P.

Figure 8.

Both apical and basolateral sides of differentiated dBCi cells were incubated with different concentrations of B[a]P for 24 hours; treated media from the apical sides were removed after 6-hr incubation, and cell treatment continued further under ALI conditions. The cells were lysed and the isolated RNA was analyzed for the expressions of the indicated miRs using miR-specific Taqman Assays (Life Technologies). A dose dependent reduction in the miR levels was observed compared to control cells (green bar). U6 was used as endogenous control. *, p < 0.05.

B[a]P and PM2.5 reduce β2AR and CFTR, and elevate IL-6, and TRPC6 expression in ex-vivo Ferret lung tracheo-bronchial slice cultures.

To test for the generality of PM2.5 and B[a]P effects on reduced β2AR and CFTR, and for elevation of IL-6 and TRPC6, we turned to the ferret lung. Ferrets are among very best of the small animal models of CF because of their ability to closely phenocopy human CF disease [86, 87]. To test whether the effects of PM2.5 and the PM2.5 toxin B[a]P could be replicated in ferret lung, we prepared tracheo-bronchial slice cultures from ferret lungs and tested whether ex-vivo exposure to PM2.5 or pure B[a]P for 24 hours would not only reduce expression of either β2AR or CFTR, but also activate secretion of IL-6 and increase expression of TRPC6. Fig 9a shows results of dissections from two lungs in which the tracheal connections to bronchial bifurcations are identified by yellow arrows. The slices were then cultured as described in the Methods for 24 hours. Fig 9b showed that exposure to either 10 μM B[a]P or 100 ng/ml PM2.5 resulted in significant and similar elevations in IL-6. Fig 9c showed that both β2AR and CFTR were reduced, while TRPC6 expression was elevated. These ex-vivo ferret data thus replicated the parallel PM2.5 and B[a]P results shown earlier in differentiated human lung epithelial organoids and polarized lung epithelial cells.

Figure 9: Effects of B[a]P and PM 2.5 in ferret lung tissue ex vivo.

Figure 9:

(a) The lung parenchyma from two ferrets were sliced into several sections as shown. Arrows indicate the tracheobronchial tubes. All tissue sections were incubating with DMSO (control), 10 μM B[a]P, or 100 ng/mL PM 2.5 in Pneumacult-EX Plus Basal media for 24 hrs. (b) IL 6 secretion was determined using the ferret ELISA kit. Data represent the mean of 6 independent sections. Statistical p values were determined with a one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey post-hoc test comparing the B[a]P or PM 2.5 treatments to the DMSO control; ¥, p < 0.05 (n = 6). (c) Representative western blotting images show reduction of CFTR, and β2AR and elevation of TRPC6 expression in explants under these treatments.

Discussion

The data reported here are consistent with the hypothesis that the principal pulmonary PM2.5 toxin is B[a]P, and that β2AR is the B[a]P receptor in lung epithelial cells which is responsible for (i) proinflammatory signaling; (ii) loss of CFTR to activate the TRPC6 calcium channel, and thus for (iii) increases in ROS and oxidative stress. In support of this concept, and as summarized in Fig 10, we have shown that both PM2.5 and B[a]P initially activate the β2AR signaling pathway through the Gi protein to drive expression of the [PI3K/AKT/IKKαβ/NFκB] pathway. This results in increased expression of IL-6 and IL-8. We validated the increased pathway activity by blocking it with the PI3K blocker LY 294002. Subsequently, apical membrane β2AR and CFTR protein expression declined by endosomal recycling. The loss of CFTR then activated proinflammatory TNFα/NFκB signaling through TRADD, resulting in activation of downstream p-NFκBp65 and cytokine secretion. However, IKKαβ was activated by signals from both the TRADD and PI3K pathways to activate NFκBp65. The loss of CFTR also led to activation of the CFTR-inhibited TRPC6 calcium channel, which may have been further activated by diacylglycerol (DAG), generated by phospholipase C-3β, using the PIP2 substrate provided by PI3K. The elevation in cytosolic calcium due to activated TRPC6 led to an uncoupled state in mitochondria, thus causing an elevation of ROS and resultant oxidative stress. The TRPC6 calcium channel blocker BI 749327 was able to prevent production of ROS and genesis of oxidative stress by denying entry of Ca2+. Unexpectedly, BI 749327 also prevented loss of CFTR, thus also suppressing TRADD signaling to NFκB. Finally, essential features of this mechanism, including reduction in β2AR and CFTR and elevation of IL6 and TRPC6 expression, was replicated by exposure of ex-vivo cultures from ferret lung to either PM2.5 or B[a]P. Based on these results from parallel experiments with PM2.5 and B[a]P, we have concluded that the PM2.5 toxin benzo[a]pyrene induces inflammation and oxidative stress in the airway by up-regulation of TRPC6 and inactivation of β2AR/CFTR signaling. These discoveries mark the first identification of the mechanism by which PM2.5, through its adsorbed toxin B[a]P, can induce inflammation and oxidative stress in lung epithelia.

Figure 10:

Figure 10:

PM 2.5 or the PM 2.5 toxin B[a]P initially acts as an irreversible β2AR agonist to hyperactivate the PI3K signaling pathway. PLC, acting on PIP2, releases DAG. DAG activates the TRPC6 channel to bring extracellular Ca+2 into the cell. Increased Ca+2 is taken up by mitochondria, which release Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and contribute to oxidative stress. BI 749327 can block TRPC6 channel activity and suppress oxidative stress. Meanwhile, hyper-activation of β2AR leads to endosomal β2AR loss, followed by endosomal loss of CFTR (−). Loss of CFTR results in (i) activation of TRADD and downstream activation of IKKαβ to drive NFκB; and (ii) further activation of CFTR-bound TRPC6. NFκB enters the nucleus and drives expression of proinflammatory cytokines IL8 and IL6. Both TRADD and PI3K pathways may be required for optimal NFκB activation, because LY294002 can block inflammation.

β2AR-CFTR signalplexes and biological condensates

Conventionally, CFTR experiments are designed based on simple linear signalplex models such as [β2AR-NHERF1-CFTR2-NHERF1-TRPC6]. However, new understanding suggests that the simple CFTR signalplex structures may occur embedded in multiple large scale clusters on the apical plasma membrane that are much more complex than previously thought [88]. The large-scale CFTR clusters are termed biological coacervates or condensates. Evidence supporting the condensate model includes the calculation that CFTR occurs in dense, discrete clusters on the epithelial plasma membrane that are much larger than might be expected from random diffusion. Further evidence is that biochemical reconstitution of purified CFTR and NHERF1 form similar structures in vitro. These structures were found to increase in abundance with phosphorylation and high cholesterol, and to rapidly dissolve upon removal of cholesterol or scaffold proteins such as NHERF1. It has been proposed that the function of cholesterol may be to promote the formation, size and stability of the condensate by favoring CFTR partitioning into cholesterol-rich ordered lipid domains in the apical plasma membrane [89]. The function of NHERF1 includes anchoring the CFTR signalplex to cytoskeletal actin through RhoA and ezrin [90]. The function of ezrin includes increasing the binding abilities of the PDZ domains in NHERF1 [91]. The C-terminal PDZ domain in CFTR, which interacts with NHERF1, may also function to ensuring apical membrane localization of CFTR [91]. In addition, older data [92] and more recent data [88] have converged to indicate that multiple CFTRs may represent hubs in a localized and dynamic association of multiple membrane proteins, many of which may interact with CFTR and with each other through the PDZ linkages provided by scaffold proteins. The scaffold proteins include (i) NHERF1 and (ii) NHERF2/E3KARP (two conserved PDZ domains each) [93–95]; (iii) PDZK1/CASP70 (four conserved PDZ domains [96]); and (iv) Zonula Occludens-1/ZO-1 (three conserved PDZ domains [97]). In addition, PDZK-1 and ZO-1 can simultaneously link to each other as well as to multiple other PDZ-domain-containing proteins in the condensate, including β2AR [60, 98], ACE2 [75, 99], TRPC6 [62, 100], CAL [101], ezrin [90], NHERF1/EBP50 [102], NHERF2/E3KARP [101], Shank2 [103], PDZK1/CASP70/NHRF3 [104], ZO-1 [105], and PLC-β3 [106]. Interestingly, PLC-β3, which plays a role in providing DAG from PIP3 to help activate TRPC6 is bound within the CFTR condensate to the first conserved PDZ domain on PDZ1 [106]. The existence of CFTR and its binding partners in condensates, coavervates or clusters of multiple interacting proteins through PDZ linkages thus complicates simple interpretation of interaction data.

Finally, there is a dynamic character to the condensate that adds further complexity to understanding the biology of CFTR. Many of these proteins, specifically including CFTR, β2AR and TRPC6, are continuously being endosomally recycled [76]. The purposes of the recycling process include removal of damaged proteins and the return of intact proteins to the membrane. Their rates of endosomal recycling vary. For example, under resting conditions, CFTR recycles through endosomes every 20 minutes, while β2AR recycles every 5 minutes [76]. ACE2 undergoes recycling in 1–4 hours in airway epithelial cells [107]. TRPC6 recycles, but the kinetics have not been determined [108]. However, once a protein within the condensate is activated, its recycling activity is temporarily paused. Thus, within lung epithelial apical membranes there are multiple CFTR-containing condensates in which β2AR, CFTR, TRPC6 and ACE2 are independently recycling in and out of the membrane at different rates, and then reassembling, perhaps in the same or different condensate. Since the TRPC6 inhibitor BI 749327 can rescue CFTR from endosomal loss, it therefore cannot be excluded that blocking the TRPC6 active site puts both TRPC6 and CFTR in a “paused” state within the CFTR condensate(s). From these considerations it is apparent that the space and time-dependent complexities supporting function in the CFTR condensates represent an important gap in our knowledge of how the dynamics of β2AR, CFTR, and TRPC6 in lung epithelial cells, or elsewhere, are regulated, and therefore how PM2.5 and B[a]P might interact with the system.

PM2.5, B[a]P, microRNAs and epigenetics

Mechanistically, the ability of PM2.5 and its toxin B]a]P to affect microRNA expression suggests that these agents may also affect gene expression indirectly through epigenetic controls. Mechanistically, five histone proteins intimately associate with nearly the entire genome by forming conditionally stable nucleosome complexes with consecutive links of 145–147 bp of DNA wrapped in 1.7 turns of total nuclear DNA. This nucleosome complex of histones and DNA thereby enables modulation of both chromatin architecture and regulatory accessibility to transcription factors across most genes [109]. Each nucleosome is formed by an octamer of four core histones, H2A, H2B, H3 and H4, and a linker histone H1 or variant [110]. However, when linker H1 is included in a chromosome, the average protected DNA link may be about 168 bp Epigenetic control is then manifest by enzymes that add or subtract covalent chemical marks to DNA, to histones or to other proteins that either activate or suppress gene expression without changing the DNA sequence [111]. MicroRNAs are integral contributors to the epigenetic control process, and are, in turn, also regulated by other epigenetic mechanisms [112]. In addition, because each microRNA can control many transcripts, the possibilities are profoundly increased for regulation of all components of the epigenetic network [113, 114] (see Fig 11). The direct relevance of epigenetic mechanisms for PM2.5/B[a]P action on gene expression is thus specifically emphasized by the concordant reduction of the same five B[a]P-dependent microRNAs, in vitro, (see Fig 8), and, in vivo, [81] in sera from service members exposed to PM2.5 from outdoor burn pits Consistently, metabolomic evidence, as previously mentioned, showed that the service members who were exposed to PM2.5 also inhaled B[a]P because both B[a]P and the AhR-mediated oxidation product BDPE were found in their sera [84, 85]. A specific example of epigenetic contribution by PM2/5/B[a]P is the case with miR-26a-5p, which targets TRPC6 mRNA. Thus, loss of miR-26a-5p, due to either PM2.5 or B[a]P, can cause elevation of TRPC6 expression [115]. Activated TRPC6, now uninhibited due to endosomally lost CFTR, is made available to mediate influx of calcium, elevate ROS and induce oxidative stress. An additional epigenetic consequence of PM2.5/B[a]P-dependent reduction of miR-26a-3p is that the epigenetic regulator EZH2 is also elevated [116, 117]. EZH2 is one of two catalytic subunits of PRC2 (Polycomb repressive complex 2), that acts to increase the density of H3K27me3 at promoter/enhancer sites on target genes. Importantly, the histone H3 is almost always poised near all possible genes because of the fundamental structure of the nucleosome (see above). Thus, increased EZH2 expression, mediated by B[a]P-induced loss of miR-26a-5p, can act promptly to enhance transcription suppression [118]. Separately, B[a]P-reduced expression of miR-766a-3p may also increase expression of EZH1, one of the top 50 Myannnlab targets for miR-766a-3p [119]. Finally, B[a]P-dependent reduction of miR-30b-5p may also be driven by inducing a hypermethylated state of the parent MIR30B locus [120, 121]. This is also caused by increased levels of EZH2 and by elevated levels of methylated CpG on newly synthesized strand of DNA by DNMT1 (maintenance methyltransferase), and by toxin-dependent epigenetic effects that can be stably transmitted across generations by DNMT3B/3A (de novo methyltransferases). Thus, increased levels of EZH2 and EZH1 from miR-26a-3p and miR-766a-3p, respectively, may contribute epigenetically to reduction of miR-30b-5p. As further emphasized by Figure 11, multiple microRNAs included in the network, including miR-101, miR-26a/b, miR-214, miR-138, and miR-124, are well-documented to directly target EZH2 thereby positioning EZH2 as a central hub for PM2.5/B[a]P dependent post-transcriptional dysregulation. By contrast, EZH1 is largely absent from established miRNA regulatory circuits, consistent with its reduced representation in the network. This selective enrichment of miRNA-EZH2 interactions suggests that PM2.5 and benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) may preferentially modulate the EZH2-PRC2 axis, leading to enhanced H3K27 trimethylation and epigenetic transcriptional repression of target genes involved in inflammation and immune regulation.

Figure 11. Relationship among microRNAs and targets that are modified by exposure to PM2.5 and B[a]P.

Figure 11.

Networks were generated using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis, incorporating microRNAs identified as significantly dysregulated following B[a]P exposure in vitro and in sera from individuals exposed to PM2.5. The connections depict potential regulatory relationships between these microRNAs and their experimentally validated or predicted targets and associated signaling pathways. The color scheme reflects the direction and magnitude of differential expression. Node shapes correspond to the type and functional category of each molecule (see Supplemental Figure S5). Solid lines indicate direct interactions, whereas dashed lines represent indirect interactions.

In addition to microRNAs, B[a]P] dependent reduction of miR-30b-5p also results in elevation of another kind of epigenetic modifier, long-non-coding RNA PVT1 (lnc RNA Plasmacytoma Variant Translocation 1). PVT1 depletion has been shown (i) to reverse inhibition of miR-30b-5p; (ii) to restore viability; (iii) to reduce apoptosis; and (iv) to suppress proinflammatory cytokine production [122]. Yet another epigenetic example is the manner by which loss of miR126a-3p may occur following activation of β2AR signaling. Mechanistically, activated β2AR, which occurs when B[a[P binds to β2AR [59], activates the ERK1/2 pathway through the Gi protein to inhibit AMPKα/p53 signaling. Inhibition of AMPKα/p53 signaling prevents posttranslational maturation of the miR-precursor pre-miR-126 to mature miR-126a-3p [123]. Thus, this mechanism of epigenetic control is by regulating conversion of a microRNA from a precursor transcript to a mature functional state. Finally, B[a]P-dependent reduction of miR-103a-3p has been traced to direct effects of ROS in alveolar epithelial cells that have been generated in people by smoking cigarettes, or in lung epithelial cells treated with cigarette-smoke-extract (CSE), or by directly treating cells with H2O2, a model ROS [124]. Cigarette smoke extract also activated proinflammatory, NFκB- driven cytokine release [125]. Not surprisingly, cigarette smoke is a source of not only B[a]P, but also the B[a][P carrier PM2.5 [126], and potently reduces CFTR expression [127]. We conclude from this analysis that epigenetic mechanisms may also contribute to lung pathology in people exposed to PM2.5 and therefore to the PM2.5 toxin B[a]P.

Candidate therapeutics for PM2.5/B[a]P toxicity

The PM2.5/B[a]P mechanisms derived so far from studies of lung epithelial cell organoids may be instructive for developing candidate therapeutics. Possible approaches may be found by considering (i) inhibitors of PI3K such as LY1294002; (ii) TRPC6 inhibitors such as BI 749327; (iii) the TRADD-inhibitor digitoxin [128]; and (iv) EZH2 inhibitors. For example, it is possible that further development of PI3K inhibitors such as LY 294002 might lead to development of compounds compatible with human use. In the case of TRPC6 inhibitors such as BI 749327, a close analogue, BI 764198, has been tested in a Phase 1 trial to treat people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in the ICU [129]. However, deaths within this population compromised determination of safety. The attractive feature of BI 749327 and equivalent analogues is that they have polypharmacy properties. For example, blocking TRPC6 not only inhibited calcium influx, but also rescued CFTR from loss by endocytic recycling. However, the mechanism(s) responsible for these dual drug actions are not fully understood. For example, it is possible that when BI 749327 binds to TRPC6, the inhibitory interaction between TRPC6 and CFTR may be enhanced, and the physiological recycling process may thereby be physiologically paused. It is also possible that NFκB activation may be blocked, not only by the preserved inhibitory action CFTR, but also by reduction in cytosolic calcium increases being blocked by both TRPC6 inhibition, and by consequent reduction in ROS. By contrast, the mechanism for the anti-inflammatory drug digitoxin is much better known. Digitoxin mimics CFTR by inhibiting TRADD, and therefore suppresses the TNFα-NFκB pathway. Digitoxin has been shown in a recent Phase 2a randomized controlled trial (RTC) to be safe for people with CF, and to significantly reduce proinflammatory signaling in upper airway biopsies [130]. Finally, it is possible that clinical grade inhibitors of EZH2 may positively affect the epigenetic network inhibited by B[a]P (see Figure 11) [131]. Importantly, at least one EZH2 inhibitor has been approved by the FDA (Tazemetostat/EPZ-66388) and four others are in clinical development [132, 133]). Consequently, understanding how these drugs may affect components of the pathological PM2.5/B[a]P-driven signaling cascades in the lung may yield insights that could enable future discoveries of candidate therapies for PM2.5/B[a]P exposure.

Limitations

This paper has limitations. First, it is a limitation that there are other atmospheric pollutants that could be causing pulmonary diseases besides B[a]P that could contribute to enhanced proinflammatory signaling in the lung [134]. However, since PM2.5 and pure B[a]P closely phenocopy each other by causing reduction in vitro of all five of the five reduced microRNAs in sera from service members exposed in vivo to burn pits, it is likely that B[a]P may be making a significant contribution. Second, it is a limitation that the differentiated epithelial organoid used as a target for B[a]P is composed of multiple cell types. However, the same PM2.5 and B[a]P effects on CFTR chloride conductance and protein expression, and on β2AR signaling, were also be detected in the polarized 16HBE14o- cells. The latter cells do differentiate to form a tight electrical layer at the air-liquid-interface but do not further differentiate into different cell types. Third, it is a limitation that we have not experimentally tested the proposed candidate mechanisms of action of the 5 different microRNAs that were reduced by PM2.5 and B[a]P exposure. However, Figure 11 illustrates predicted interactions, and we suggest that more detailed studies exceed what can be addressed by the present studies, and must be deferred to the future. Fourth, it is a limitation that we have not tested β2AR and AhR inhibitors side by side in all the different tests. These proteins clearly have different properties, but may also add to the effects since they are in the same cells and bind B[a]P. We suggest that this complication puts the analysis beyond what can be accomplished in the present studies and must also be deferred to the future. Fifth, it is a limitation that we do not know how the TRPC6 inhibitor BI 749327 not only blocks the TRPC6 channel but also preserves its inhibitory signalplex partner CFTR. We suggest that this complication also puts the analysis beyond what can be accomplished in the present studies and must therefore be deferred to the future. Sixth, it is a limitation that we do not understand the mechanism by which PI3K and the TRADD-dependent pathways differentially drive NFκB through IKKαβ. However, the PM2.5/B[a]P driven PI3K pathway may be dominant in the presence of either PM2.5 or B[a]P. We suggest that the investigation of this interesting mechanism also puts the analysis beyond what can be accomplished in the present studies and must also be deferred to the future.

Conclusion:

The PM2.5 toxin Benzo[a]Pyrene (B[a]P) is toxic to the lung by virtue of its ability to form an irreversibly activating complex with β2AR, and thus indirectly with CFTR and TRPC-6. The B[a]P:β2AR complex activates Gi, which drives the proinflammatory [PI3K/AKT/IKKαβ/NFκB] signaling pathway. This pathway is blocked by the PI3K inhibitor LY 294002. Desensitization of B[a]P:β2AR occurs by endosomal recycling, which is accompanied by equivalent loss of CFTR in the β2AR-NHERF1-CFTR signalplex. With loss of CFTR, TRADD is activated to drive downstream activation of NFκB signaling, and the CFTR-inhibited TRPC6 calcium channel is itself released, activated and further expressed. Increased cytosolic calcium from TRPC6 leads to mitochondrial dysfunction, increased ROS production and Oxidative Stress, which is blocked by the TRPC6 inhibitor BI 749327. Blocking TRPC6 with BI 749327 also pauses the B[a]P-dependent loss of CFTR and downstream proinflammatory consequences. Thus, the contributions of both activated PI3K and loss of CFTR to proinflammatory NFκB signaling, and increased cytosolic calcium concentration due to activation of TRPC6, results in a proinflammatory cystic fibrosis-like phenotype in persons who have inhaled PM2.5, and thus also have inhaled the adsorbed B[a]P toxin. Studies of ex-vivo ferret tracheo-bronchial slice cultures support this conclusion. These discoveries mark the first identification of a mechanism by which exposure to PM2.5, or to the PM2.5 toxin B[a]P itself, can induce inflammation and TRPC6-dependent oxidative stress in lung epithelia.

Methods

Materials and Reagents

All chemicals and reagents were purchased commercially. Benzo[a]pyrene, PM 2.5 (ERMCZ110), CFTRinh-172, IBMX, amiloride, Forskolin, MG-132, L-glutathione, and Millipore Immobilon Western (Sigma-Aldrich); BI 749327, LY 294002, and LY 303511 (Cayman Chemical); MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide; EZ-Link™ Sulfo-NHS-SS-Biotin, CellROX green reagent, Dynabeads Protein G, Pierce Streptavidin magnetic beads, Halt™ protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (Thermo Fisher) ; Fluo-4 AM and Probenecid (Invitrogen); Human IL-8/CXCL8 DuoSet® ELISA kit, Human IL-6 ELISA DuoSet® kit, and Human TNF-alpha DuoSet® ELISA (R&D Systems); Ferret IL-6 ELISA kit (Genorise, PA, USA); Pneumacult-ALI media kit and Pneumacult-EX Plus Basal media kit (Stemcell); and Gibco MEM (Thermo Fisher).

All antibodies were purchased commercially. β-actin (Sigma, A5441); CFTR (R&D Systems, MAB1660); CFTR (SCBT, sc-376683); β2AR (Novus Biologicals, NBP261710); TRADD (SCBT, sc-46653); TNFR1 (Cell Signaling, 3736), IKKβ (SCBT, sc-8014); IκBα (Cell Signaling, 9242); phospho-IκBα Ser32/36 (Cell Signaling, 9246); phospho-NFκB p65 Ser276 (Cell Signaling, 3037); NFκB p65 (Cell Signaling, 8242); phospho-IKKα/β Ser176/180 (Cell Signaling, 2697); IKKα (Cell Signaling, 11930); AKT (Cell Signaling, 9272); phosphor-AKT Ser473 (Cell Signaling, 9271); TRPC6 (Protein Tech, 18236-1-AP); and Ubiquitin (Protein Tech, 80992-1-RR).

Cell Cultures and Treatments

We thank Dr. R.G. Crystal (Cornell Medical College, New York City, NY) for the gift of the hTERT-transformed BCi-NS1.1 basal stem cell. The basal cells were cultured, maintained, and differentiated on Transwell or Snapwell inserts under Air-Liquid Interface (ALI) conditions according to the instructions from Dr. Crystal’s lab. Human bronchial 16HBE14o- (SCC150) cell lines were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, and were cultured and subdivided according to the manufacture’s instruction. Human BCi-NS1.1 basal stem cell and 16HBE14o- cells were seeded at a concentration of 5×105 cells/cm2 on 12-mm Snapwell or Transwell inserts and 9×105 cells/cm2 on 24-mm Transwell inserts. All experiments were performed in differentiated BCi-NS1.1 (dBCi) and polarized 16HBE14o- cells after maintaining at the air-liquid-interface (ALI) for 25–28 days and for 9–10 days, respectively, in a humidified tissue culture incubator at 37°C, 5% CO2.

The following compounds were dissolved in DMSO: B[a]P, LY 294002, LY 303511, BI 749327, and PM 2.5 powder. For cell treatments, both apical and basolateral sides of cell monolayers were exposed to DMSO (Control), B[a]P, or PM 2.5 in the presence or absence of LY 294002, LY 303511, or BI 749327; after 6-hr incubation, treated media from the apical sides were removed and cells were continued to expose to drugs for additional 18 hrs under ALI conditions. The DMSO concentration in all treatments was less than 1.0%. After treatments, cell monolayers were prepared for cell viability, Ussing chamber, cell surface biotinylation, endosomal recycling, immunoprecipitation, or microRNA assays. The treated media from the basolateral sides were collected for measuring the secreted levels of IL-8, IL-6 and TNFα.

Cell viability assay

Cell viability was assessed using the MTT assay. To each treatment well of a 12-well plate, an equal volume of MTT solution (5 mg/mL) to the existing media in the culture, and cells were incubated in CO2 incubator in the dark for 2 hrs. The medium was removed; Formazan crystals formed by the cells were dissolved using 200 μl of solubilization solution; and the plate was shaken on a rotary to ensure complete dissolution of the crystals. Absorbance was then read at 570 nm using the CLARIOstar microplate reader (BMG LABTECH, UK).

Measurement of IL-8, IL-6 and TNFα

Culture media from the basolateral compartments were collected and used to assay for IL-8, IL6 and TNFα using respective DuoSet® ELISA kits, and performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Concentrations of human TNFα, IL-6, and IL-8 were calculated using a standard curve and normalized to the MTT or total protein concentration values.

Ussing chamber analysis

Treated Snapwell inserts were mounted in Ussing Chambers (Physiologic Instruments, Reno, Nevada). A basolateral-to-apical chloride gradient was imposed by replacing NaCl with sodium Gluconate. The chloride-containing solution was 120 mM NaCl, 20 mM NaHCO3, 5 mM KHCO3, 1.2 mM NaH2PO4, 1.2 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgCl2, and 5.6 mM glucose. In the chloride-free solution, all Cl salts were exchanged for gluconate salts, and Ca+2 was increased to 5 mM to compensate for the chelation of Ca+2 by gluconate. Both chamber compartments were gassed with 5% CO2 (pH 7.4). Experiments were done at 37°C. CFTR channel activity was detected by first inactivating sodium currents with 100 μM amiloride; then activating CFTR chloride channels with 10 μM forskolin and 100 μM IBMX; then specifically inactivating CFTR channels with 10 μM CFTRinh-172. At the end of the assays, cells were washed with PBS and lysed in RIPA buffer supplemented with the anti-protease/phosphatase cocktail or labeled with cell impermeable Sulfo-NHS-SS-biotin for Western blot analyses.

Cell surface biotinylation

After B[a]P treatment, ALI differentiated cells were washed three times with Ca+2/Mg+2-PBS buffer (pH 8.2) and then incubated with cell impermeable Sulfo-NHS-SS-biotin (1 mg/mL) for 2 hours at 4°C in the dark, followed by washing three times with 100 mM Tris buffer to quench all free biotin reagent. Biotinylated cells were lysed in RIPA buffer supplemented with anti-protease/phosphatase cocktail; biotinylated proteins at 1 mg/mL in the lysates were extracted using streptavidin magnetic beads; and biotinylated β2AR and CFTR were determined by Western blot.

Endosomal recycling

To measure recycling of endogenous β2AR and CFTR, ALI differentiated cells were first biotinylated 1 mg/ml Sulfo-NHS-SS-biotin for 2 hours at 4°C in the dark, followed by incubation at 37°C for 6 hours with culture media containing DMSO control or different concentrations of B[a]P. After 37°C incubation, biotin molecules remaining at the cell surface were stripped five times with glutathione (GSH) solution (Bomberger JM et al, 2011). One biotinylated cell sample without 37°C incubation and GSH stripping and other biotinylated cell sample without 37°C incubation and with GSH stripping were used as control for biotin labeling efficiency and control for GSH stripping efficiency, respectively. Biotinylated proteins were extracted from the lysates using streptavidin magnetic beads, and biotinylated β2AR and CFTR were determined by Western blot. β-actin was used in the Western blot for equal amounts of biotinylated samples used in the biotinylated protein extraction.

CFTR Ubiquitination

Both apical and basolateral sides of polarized 16HBE14o- cell monolayers were exposed to DMSO (Control) or different concentrations of B[a]P in the presence of 20 μM proteasome inhibitor MG-132; then treated media only from the apical side were removed after 6-hr incubation, and cells were continuously exposed to B[a]P further for 18 hrs at the ALI. After treatment, cell monolayers were lysed in RIPA buffer. The lysates (1mg/mL) were precleared with Protein G Dynabeads and then incubated for 6 hrs at 4°C with 2 μg of normal mouse serum or anti-CFTR R Domain antibody, followed by incubation for overnight with Protein G Dynabeads. After washing, CFTR ubiquitination in the immunoprecipitated complexes was analyzed by Western blot with an anti-ubiquitin antibody.

Fluorescence measurement of intracellular free calcium ([Ca2+]i)

16HBE14o- cells at a density of 1×105 cells/mL grown in black visiplateTM 24-well tissue culture plates were treated with DMSO or different concentrations of B[a]P or PM 2.5 for 24 hrs at 37°C, followed by washing three times with Ca+2/Mg+2-free HBSS buffer and incubation for 1 hr at 37°C with 10 μM cell permeant Fluo-4 AM and 2.5 mM organic anion-transport inhibitor probenecid diluted in Ca+2/Mg+2-free HBSS buffer. After washing, the basal fluorescence intensity of Fluo-4 AM in the cells bathed in Ca+2/Mg+2-free HBSS buffer was recorded at Ex 483 nm/Em 530 nm using the CLARIOstar microplate reader (BMG LABTECH). When the baseline was stable, 1 mM CaCl2 was added, and the fluorescent intensity was continued to record over a time period. At least three independent experiments in duplication were conducted.

Oxidative stress assay

CellROX Green reagent (ThermoFisher) was designed to detect the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in living cells. These reagents are cell-permeable and show no or very weak fluorescence in a reduced state, but their oxidation in the presence of ROS results in a strong fluorescence. Both apical and basolateral sides of polarized 16HBE14o- cells were incubated with PM 2.5, B[a]P, or hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at 37°C in the CO2 incubator. After 6hr incubation, treated media from the apical sides were removed, and replaced with 10 μM CellROX Green in Ca+2/Mg+2-free HBSS buffer, followed by further incubation for 18 hrs. Cell monolayers were washed three times with PBS at room temperature and lysed in 0.1% Triton X-100-PBS. The cell lysates were transferred to a black, clear bottom 24-well plate, and fluorescence at Ex 483 nm/Em 530 nm was recorded using the CLARIOstar microplate reader (BMG LABTECH). Background fluorescence was subtracted from each value and normalized with the total protein concentration.

Western blotting

Treated cells were washed with PBS and lysed in RIPA buffer supplemented with the anti-protease/phosphatase cocktail. Equivalent amounts of lysates (50 μg/sample) were electrophoresed on 4–12% gradient gels (Invitrogen), transferred to PVDF membranes, and membranes were probed at 4°C overnight with corresponding primary antibody diluted to the concentration according to the manufacture’s recommended instructions. After incubation with appropriate secondary antibody coupling to HRP and washing, immunoreactive bands were exposed to chemiluminescent HRP substrate solution and visualized using BioRad ChemiDocTM Imaging System and quantified using the Imagelab software.

RNA isolation and measurement of microRNAs

Both apical and basolateral sides of differentiated dBCi cells were incubated with DMSO or different concentrations of B[a]P for 24 hours. Treated media from the apical sides were removed after 6-hr incubation, and cell treatment continued further under ALI conditions. The cells were lysed and total RNA were extracted using mirVana total RNA isolation kits (Life Technologies, Frederick, MD) following the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA yield and quality was analyzed on a NanoDrop spectrophotometer ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockville, MD) with all samples showing A260/A280 absorbance ratios between 1.8 and 2.0, indicative of high-quality RNA. MiRNAs analysis was performed with specific Taqman probes and U6 was used as an endogenous control to normalize expression of miRs. The data represents average of three technical replicates. The relative fold changes of miRs were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCT method. The data represents relative fold changes with standard error of the mean (mean ± SEM).

Pathway analyses

In silico analysis of differentially expressed miRNAs following B[a]P exposure in vitro and in sera from individuals exposed to PM2.5 was conducted using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, Qiagen; https://www.qiagenbioinformatics.com/products/ingenuity-pathway-analysis). Differentially expressed miRNAs and their experimentally validated or predicted targets were further analyzed to construct functional interaction networks involving regulatory molecules and signaling pathways. Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate the enrichment of differentially expressed miRNAs within specific biological pathways. A significance threshold of p < 0.05 was applied unless otherwise stated.

Ex vivo ferret lung culture model

We thank Dr. Sharon Juliano (USUHS, Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Genetics) for donating lung tissues from two ferrets. Lung parenchymal tissues were washed three times with PBS supplemented 1X penicillin/streptomycin in a petri dish, and the tissues were then dissected into small cubes, 9 cubes per ferret lung with the average wet weight of 400 mg, containing tracheobronchial tubes. The tissues were transferred to a 24-well tissue culture plate, conditioned for 1hr in Pneumacult-EX Plus Basal media cultured, and then cultured for 24 hr in the same media containing DMSO, 100 ng/ml PM 2.5, or 10 μM B[a]P in a humidified tissue culture incubator at 37°C, 5% CO2. After incubation, culture medium samples were collected, centrifuged at 400 × g, 4°C for 5 min to remove cellular material, and analyzed by Ferret IL-6 ELISA kit. Treated tissues were washed with PBS and homogenized in RIPA buffer supplemented with anti-protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail using a handheld motor driven tissue homogenizer, followed by centrifugation at 20,000 rpm for 5 min. Equivalent amounts of lysates (50 μg/sample) were electrophoresed on 4–12% gradient gels and transferred to PVDF membranes, and membranes were probed at 40C overnight with corresponding primary antibody for CFTR (CFF Antibody Distribution program, mAb 660 + mAb 596), β2AR (Novus Biologicals, NBP261710), TRPC6 (Protein Tech, 18236-1-AP), and β-Actin (Cell Signaling, 4970).

Statistics

Except as noted, all plotted data points are the means of 3 or more independent experiments. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical differences among treatment groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA using Tukey as a post-hoc test for multiple comparisons. p < 0.05 is considered significant.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1

Acknowledgements:

We gratefully acknowledge support for this project by NIH Grant 1RO1HL167048 (Pollard HB, PI). We thank Patty Deuster for insightful comments. We thank Laiman Tavedi for expert administrative support. We thank high school summer intern Elsa Clark for help in data curation. USUHS Clearance number: REQ0081346.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests associated with this manuscript.

Disclaimer: The opinions, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the U.S. Army, Department of War, the U.S. Government or the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. The use of trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such reagents or commercial hardware or software. This document may not be cited for purposes of advertisement.

Data availability:

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1.Xing YF, Xu YH, Shi MH, Lian YX. The impact of PM2.5 on the human respiratory system. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(1):E69–74. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2016.01.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Han C, Oh J, Lim YH, Kim S, Hong YC. Long-term exposure to fine particulate matter and development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly. Environ Int. 2020;143:105895. Epub 20200630. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pryor JT, Cowley LO, Simonds SE. The Physiological Effects of Air Pollution: Particulate Matter, Physiology and Disease. Front Public Health. 2022;10:882569. Epub 20220714. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.882569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hamanaka RB, Mutlu GM. Particulate matter air pollution: effects on the respiratory system. J Clin Invest. 2025;135(17). Epub 20250902. doi: 10.1172/jci194312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dominici F, Wang Y, Correia AW, Ezzati M, Pope CA 3rd, Dockery DW. Chemical Composition of Fine Particulate Matter and Life Expectancy: In 95 US Counties Between 2002 and 2007. Epidemiology. 2015;26(4):556–64. doi: 10.1097/ede.0000000000000297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cohen AJ, Brauer M, Burnett R, Anderson HR, Frostad J, Estep K, et al. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet. 2017;389(10082):1907–18. Epub 20170410. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30505-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fu C, Li Y, Xi H, Niu Z, Chen N, Wang R, et al. Benzo(a)pyrene and cardiovascular diseases: An overview of pre-clinical studies focused on the underlying molecular mechanism. Front Nutr. 2022;9:978475. Epub 20220804. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.978475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Alhamdow A, Lindh C, Albin M, Gustavsson P, Tinnerberg H, Broberg K. Early markers of cardiovascular disease are associated with occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):9426. Epub 20170825. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09956-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ji K, Xing C, Jiang F, Wang X, Guo H, Nan J, et al. Benzo[a]pyrene induces oxidative stress and endothelial progenitor cell dysfunction via the activation of the NF-κB pathway. International journal of molecular medicine. 2013;31(4):922–30. Epub 20130226. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2013.1288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Guo J, Chai G, Song X, Hui X, Li Z, Feng X, et al. Long-term exposure to particulate matter on cardiovascular and respiratory diseases in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1134341. Epub 20230328. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1134341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Khatana SAM, Eberly LA, Nathan AS, Groeneveld PW. Projected Change in the Burden of Excess Cardiovascular Deaths Associated With Extreme Heat by Midcentury (2036–2065) in the Contiguous United States. Circulation. 2023;148(20):1559–69. Epub 20231030. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.123.066017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li J, Wang Y, Steenland K, Liu P, van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, et al. Long-term effects of PM(2.5) components on incident dementia in the northeastern United States. Innovation (Camb). 2022;3(2):100208. Epub 20220117. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shi L, Zhu Q, Wang Y, Hao H, Zhang H, Schwartz J, et al. Incident dementia and long-term exposure to constituents of fine particle air pollution: A national cohort study in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120(1):e2211282119. Epub 20221227. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2211282119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang B, Weuve J, Langa KM, D’Souza J, Szpiro A, Faul J, et al. Comparison of Particulate Air Pollution From Different Emission Sources and Incident Dementia in the US. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183(10):1080–9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.3300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Elser H, Frankland TB, Chen C, Tartof SY, Mayeda ER, Lee GS, et al. Wildfire Smoke Exposure and Incident Dementia. JAMA Neurol. 2024. Epub 20241125. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.4058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shi L, Wu X, Danesh Yazdi M, Braun D, Abu Awad Y, Wei Y, et al. Long-term effects of PM(2·5) on neurological disorders in the American Medicare population: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Planet Health. 2020;4(12):e557–e65. Epub 20201019. doi: 10.1016/s2542-5196(20)30227-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Deng Y, Liu Y, Hao H, Xu K, Zhu Q, Li H, et al. The role of comorbidities in the associations between air pollution and Alzheimer’s disease: A national cohort study in the American Medicare population. PLoS Med. 2026;23(2):e1004912. Epub 20260217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Levy I, Grotto I, Levine H, Karakis I. Premature mortality and years of life lost attributable to ambient air pollution in Israel, compared to Europe: analysis and implications. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2026;15(1). Epub 20260309. doi: 10.1186/s13584-026-00753-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Grineski SE, Renteria RA, Collins TW, Bakian AV, Bilder D, VanDerslice JA, et al. PM(2.5) threshold exceedances during the prenatal period and risk of intellectual disability. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2024;34(5):861–7. Epub 20240222. doi: 10.1038/s41370-024-00647-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Renteria RA, Grineski SE, Gomez J, Bilder D, Collins TW, Bakian AV. Associations between prenatal PM(2.5) exposures and intellectual disability: Are there differential impacts based on co-occurrence of autism spectrum disorder? Environ Res. 2026;289:123378. Epub 20251119. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2025.123378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chun H, Leung C, Wen SW, McDonald J, Shin HH. Maternal exposure to air pollution and risk of autism in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Pollut. 2020;256:113307. Epub 20190926. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lam J, Sutton P, Kalkbrenner A, Windham G, Halladay A, Koustas E, et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Multiple Airborne Pollutants and Autism Spectrum Disorder. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0161851. Epub 20160921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rahman MM, Shu YH, Chow T, Lurmann FW, Yu X, Martinez MP, et al. Prenatal Exposure to Air Pollution and Autism Spectrum Disorder: Sensitive Windows of Exposure and Sex Differences. Environ Health Perspect. 2022;130(1):17008. Epub 20220118. doi: 10.1289/ehp9509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.NAAQSssss. EPA.gov 2025. Available from: epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants/naaqs-table.
  • 25.Zhai X, Wang J, Sun J, Xin L. PM(2.5) induces inflammatory responses via oxidative stress-mediated mitophagy in human bronchial epithelial cells. Toxicol Res (Camb). 2022;11(1):195–205. Epub 20220119. doi: 10.1093/toxres/tfac001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang Y, Zhong Y, Liao J, Wang G. PM2.5-related cell death patterns. Int J Med Sci. 2021;18(4):1024–9. Epub 20210101. doi: 10.7150/ijms.46421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fan X, Dong T, Yan K, Ci X, Peng L. PM2.5 increases susceptibility to acute exacerbation of COPD via NOX4/Nrf2 redox imbalance-mediated mitophagy. Redox Biol. 2023;59:102587. Epub 20221230. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Basith S, Manavalan B, Shin TH, Park CB, Lee WS, Kim J, et al. The Impact of Fine Particulate Matter 2.5 on the Cardiovascular System: A Review of the Invisible Killer. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022;12(15). Epub 20220802. doi: 10.3390/nano12152656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jaiswal C, Singh AK. Particulate matter exposure and its consequences on hippocampal neurogenesis and cognitive function in experimental models. Environ Pollut. 2024;363(Pt 2):125275. Epub 20241107. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kaur K, Lesseur C, Deyssenroth MA, Kloog I, Schwartz JD, Marsit CJ, et al. PM(2.5) exposure during pregnancy is associated with altered placental expression of lipid metabolic genes in a US birth cohort. Environ Res. 2022;211:113066. Epub 20220303. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rao X, Zhong J, Brook RD, Rajagopalan S. Effect of Particulate Matter Air Pollution on Cardiovascular Oxidative Stress Pathways. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2018;28(9):797–818. Epub 20171212. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bae HR, Chandy M, Aguilera J, Smith EM, Nadeau KC, Wu JC, et al. Adverse effects of air pollution-derived fine particulate matter on cardiovascular homeostasis and disease. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2022;32(8):487–98. Epub 20211005. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2021.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Meng X, Zhang Y, Yang KQ, Yang YK, Zhou XL. Potential Harmful Effects of PM2.5 on Occurrence and Progression of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Prevention Measures. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(8). Epub 20160725. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13080748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li W, Lin G, Xiao Z, Zhang Y, Li B, Zhou Y, et al. A review of respirable fine particulate matter (PM(2.5))-induced brain damage. Front Mol Neurosci. 2022;15:967174. Epub 20220907. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.967174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Meo SA, Shaikh N, Alotaibi M, AlWabel AA, Alqumaidi H. Effect of air pollutants particulate matter (PM(2.5), PM(10)), sulfur dioxide (SO(2)) and ozone (O(3)) on cognitive health. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):19616. Epub 20240823. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70646-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yoshida T, Yoshioka Y, Takahashi H, Misato K, Mori T, Hirai T, et al. Intestinal absorption and biological effects of orally administered amorphous silica particles. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2014;9(1):532. Epub 20140926. doi: 10.1186/1556-276x-9-532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Currie HA, Perry CC. Silica in plants: biological, biochemical and chemical studies. Ann Bot. 2007;100(7):1383–9. Epub 20071006. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cheng B, Ma Y, Li H, Feng F, Zhang Y, Qin P. Water-soluble ions and source apportionment of PM(2.5) depending on synoptic weather patterns in an urban environment in spring dust season. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):21953. Epub 20221219. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26615-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Honda A, Fukushima W, Oishi M, Tsuji K, Sawahara T, Hayashi T, et al. Effects of Components of PM(2.5) Collected in Japan on the Respiratory and Immune Systems. Int J Toxicol. 2017;36(2):153–64. Epub 20170105. doi: 10.1177/1091581816682224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lobscheid A, McKone T, DA V. Exploring relationships between outdoor air particulate-associated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and PM2.5: A case study of benzo(a)pyrene in California metropolitan regions. Atmospheric Environment. 2007;41(27):5659–72. doi: doi:.org/ 10.1016/atmosenv.2007.02.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bukowska B, Mokra K, Michałowicz J. Benzo[a]pyrene-Environmental Occurrence, Human Exposure, and Mechanisms of Toxicity. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(11). Epub 20220606. doi: 10.3390/ijms23116348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhang S, Shao D, Liu H, Feng J, Feng R, Song X, et al. Metabolomics analysis reveals that benzo[a]pyrene, a component of PM2.5, promotes pulmonary injury by modifying lipid metabolism in a phospholipase A2-dependent manner in vivo and in vitro. Redox Biology. 2017;13:459–69. Epub 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Petry T, Schmid P, Schlatter C. The use of toxic equivalency factors in assessing occupational and environmental health risk associated with exposure to airborne mixtures of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Chemosphere. 1996;32(4):639–48. doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(95)00348-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lewandowska AU, Staniszewska M, Witkowska A, Machuta M, Falkowska L. Benzo(a)pyrene parallel measurements in PM(1) and PM(2.5) in the coastal zone of the Gulf of Gdansk (Baltic Sea) in the heating and non-heating seasons. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018;25(20):19458–69. Epub 20180505. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2089-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tajima H, Tajiki-Nishino R, Watanabe Y, Kurata K, Fukuyama T. Activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor by benzo[a]pyrene increases interleukin 33 expression and eosinophil infiltration in a mouse model of allergic airway inflammation. J Appl Toxicol. 2020;40(11):1545–53. Epub 20200618. doi: 10.1002/jat.4017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Choi H, Dostal M, Pastorkova A, Rossner P Jr., Sram RJ. Airborne Benzo[a]Pyrene may contribute to divergent Pheno-Endotypes in children. Environ Health. 2021;20(1):40. Epub 20210409. doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00711-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Vogel CFA, Van Winkle LS, Esser C, Haarmann-Stemmann T. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor as a target of environmental stressors - Implications for pollution mediated stress and inflammatory responses. Redox Biol. 2020;34:101530. Epub 20200418. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gelboin HV. Benzo[alpha]pyrene metabolism, activation and carcinogenesis: role and regulation of mixed-function oxidases and related enzymes. Physiol Rev. 1980;60(4):1107–66. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1980.60.4.1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Phillips DH. Fifty years of benzo(a)pyrene. Nature. 1983;303(5917):468–72. doi: 10.1038/303468a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Li R, Zhou R, Zhang J. Function of PM2.5 in the pathogenesis of lung cancer and chronic airway inflammatory diseases. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(5):7506–14. Epub 20180326. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Feng Y, Jin T, Wei Y, Steenland K, Schwartz J. Long-term exposure to PM(2·5) constituents and incident cancer among Medicare beneficiaries in the USA: a national cohort study. Lancet Planet Health. 2025;9(12):101334. Epub 20251208. doi: 10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wang E, Tu W, Do DC, Xiao X, Bhatti SB, Yang L, et al. Benzo(a)pyrene Enhanced Dermatophagoides Group 1 (Der f 1)-Induced TGFβ1 Signaling Activation Through the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor-RhoA Axis in Asthma. Front Immunol. 2021;12:643260. Epub 20210415. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.643260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Podechard N, Fardel O, Corolleur M, Bernard M, Lecureur V. Inhibition of human mesenchymal stem cell-derived adipogenesis by the environmental contaminant benzo(a)pyrene. Toxicol In Vitro. 2009;23(6):1139–44. Epub 20090530. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Shi H, Liu J, Gao H. Benzo(α)pyrene induces oxidative stress and inflammation in human vascular endothelial cells through AhR and NF-κB pathways. Microvasc Res. 2021;137:104179. Epub 20210527. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2021.104179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Øvrevik J, Låg M, Lecureur V, Gilot D, Lagadic-Gossmann D, Refsnes M, et al. AhR and Arnt differentially regulate NF-κB signaling and chemokine responses in human bronchial epithelial cells. Cell Commun Signal. 2014;12:48. Epub 20140724. doi: 10.1186/s12964-014-0048-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kerley-Hamilton JS, Trask HW, Ridley CJ, Dufour E, Lesseur C, Ringelberg CS, et al. Inherent and benzo[a]pyrene-induced differential aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling greatly affects life span, atherosclerosis, cardiac gene expression, and body and heart growth in mice. Toxicol Sci. 2012;126(2):391–404. Epub 20120106. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfs002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Omidian K, Rafiei H, Bandy B. Evidence against an involvement of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in polyphenol inhibition of benzo[a]pyrene-induced oxidative stress and neoplastic transformation. Food Chem Toxicol. 2017;107(Pt A):526–7. Epub 20170713. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.07.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Donini CF, El Helou M, Wierinckx A, Győrffy B, Aires S, Escande A, et al. Long-Term Exposure of Early-Transformed Human Mammary Cells to Low Doses of Benzo[a]pyrene and/or Bisphenol A Enhances Their Cancerous Phenotype via an AhR/GPR30 Interplay. Front Oncol. 2020;10:712. Epub 20200529. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mayati A, Podechard N, Rineau M, Sparfel L, Lagadic-Gossmann D, Fardel O, et al. Benzo(a)pyrene triggers desensitization of β2-adrenergic pathway. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):3262. Epub 20170612. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03646-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Naren AP, Cobb B, Li C, Roy K, Nelson D, Heda GD, et al. A macromolecular complex of beta 2 adrenergic receptor, CFTR, and ezrin/radixin/moesin-binding phosphoprotein 50 is regulated by PKA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(1):342–6. Epub 20021226. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0135434100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Srivastava M, Eidelman O, Zhang J, Paweletz C, Caohuy H, Yang Q, et al. Digitoxin mimics gene therapy with CFTR and suppresses hypersecretion of IL-8 from cystic fibrosis lung epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(20):7693–8. Epub 2004/05/12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402030101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Antigny F, Norez C, Dannhoffer L, Bertrand J, Raveau D, Corbi P, et al. Transient receptor potential canonical channel 6 links Ca2+ mishandling to cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator channel dysfunction in cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011;44(1):83–90. Epub 20100304. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0347OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Moliteo E, Sciacca M, Palmeri A, Papale M, Manti S, Parisi GF, et al. Cystic Fibrosis and Oxidative Stress: The Role of CFTR. Molecules. 2022;27(16). Epub 20220821. doi: 10.3390/molecules27165324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Artusi I, Rubin M, Cozza G. Redox Imbalance in Cystic Fibrosis: The Multifaceted Role of Oxidative Stress. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025;18(6). Epub 20250524. doi: 10.3390/ph18060784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Grebert C, Becq F, Vandebrouck C. Focus on TRP channels in cystic fibrosis. Cell Calcium. 2019;81:29–37. Epub 20190530. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2019.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Tong GQ, Zhang ZH, Zhao Y, Liu JJ, Han JB. Traffic-related PM2.5 induces cytosolic [Ca2+] increase regulated by Orai1, alters the CaN-NFAT signaling pathway, and affects IL-2 and TNF-α cytoplasmic levels in Jurkat T-cells. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2015;68(1):31–7. Epub 20140907. doi: 10.1007/s00244-014-0077-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bacsa B, Tiapko O, Stockner T, Groschner K. Mechanisms and significance of Ca(2+) entry through TRPC channels. Curr Opin Physiol. 2020;17:25–33. Epub 20200629. doi: 10.1016/j.cophys.2020.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Milici A, Talavera K. TRP Channels as Cellular Targets of Particulate Matter. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(5). Epub 20210309. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Chen Q, Zhou Y, Zhou L, Fu Z, Yang C, Zhao L, et al. TRPC6-dependent Ca(2+) signaling mediates airway inflammation in response to oxidative stress via ERK pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(3):170. Epub 20200305. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2360-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tauseef M, Knezevic N, Chava KR, Smith M, Sukriti S, Gianaris N, et al. TLR4 activation of TRPC6-dependent calcium signaling mediates endotoxin-induced lung vascular permeability and inflammation. J Exp Med. 2012;209(11):1953–68. Epub 20121008. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Saqib U, Munjuluri S, Sarkar S, Biswas S, Mukherjee O, Satsangi H, et al. Transient Receptor Potential Canonical 6 (TRPC6) Channel in the Pathogenesis of Diseases: A Jack of Many Trades. Inflammation. 2023;46(4):1144–60. Epub 20230418. doi: 10.1007/s10753-023-01808-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chen Y, Zhan N, Xu J, Huang Y, Su Y, Liu Z, et al. PM(2.5) from biofuel smoke induces inflammatory response through the TRPC6/Ca(2+)/NLRP3 signaling pathway. Environ Geochem Health. 2025;47(7):269. Epub 20250616. doi: 10.1007/s10653-025-02578-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Brewington JJ, Backstrom J, Feldman A, Kramer EL, Moncivaiz JD, Ostmann AJ, et al. Chronic β2AR stimulation limits CFTR activation in human airway epithelia. JCI Insight. 2018;3(4). Epub 20180222. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.93029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Peitzman ER, Zaidman NA, Maniak PJ, O’Grady SM. Carvedilol binding to β2-adrenergic receptors inhibits CFTR-dependent anion secretion in airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2016;310(1):L50–8. Epub 20151113. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00296.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Caohuy H, Eidelman O, Chen T, Mungunsukh O, Yang Q, Walton NI, et al. Inflammation in the COVID-19 airway is due to inhibition of CFTR signaling by the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):16895. Epub 20240723. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66473-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ameen N, Silvis M, Bradbury NA. Endocytic trafficking of CFTR in health and disease. J Cyst Fibros. 2007;6(1):1–14. Epub 20061113. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2006.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Maaliki D, Jaffa AA, Nasser S, Sahebkar A, Eid AH. Adrenoceptor Desensitization: Current Understanding of Mechanisms. Pharmacol Rev. 2024;76(3):358–87. Epub 20240502. doi: 10.1124/pharmrev.123.000831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kamiar A, Yousefi K, Dunkley JC, Webster KA, Shehadeh LA. β(2)-Adrenergic receptor agonism as a therapeutic strategy for kidney disease. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2021;320(5):R575–r87. Epub 20210210. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00287.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Spadari RC, Cavadas C, de Carvalho A, Ortolani D, de Moura AL, Vassalo PF. Role of Beta-adrenergic Receptors and Sirtuin Signaling in the Heart During Aging, Heart Failure, and Adaptation to Stress. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2018;38(1):109–20. Epub 20171024. doi: 10.1007/s10571-017-0557-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zhang Z, Leir SH, Harris A. Oxidative stress regulates CFTR gene expression in human airway epithelial cells through a distal antioxidant response element. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2015;52(3):387–96. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2014-0263OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Dalgard CL, Polston KF, Sukumar G, Mallon CT, Wilkerson MD, Pollard HB. MicroRNA Expression Profiling of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch Cohort for Identification of “Enviro-miRs” Associated With Deployment-Based Environmental Exposure. J Occup Environ Med. 2016;58(8 Suppl 1):S97–s103. Epub 2016/08/09. doi: 10.1097/jom.0000000000000764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Wang X, Doherty TA, James C. Military burn pit exposure and airway disease: Implications for our Veteran population. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023;131(6):720–5. Epub 20230619. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Butler DA, Styka AN, DA S. Assessment of Department of Veterans Affairs Airborn Hazards and Open Burn Pit Registry, Chapter 5. Analysis and Interpretation of Exposures data,: National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Khan A, Thatcher TH, Woeller CF, Sime PJ, Phipps RP, Hopke PK, et al. Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Past Environmental Exposures From Molecular Profiling of Post-Exposure Human Serum Samples. J Occup Environ Med. 2019;61 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S55–s64. doi: 10.1097/jom.0000000000001692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Walker DI, Mallon CT, Hopke PK, Uppal K, Go YM, Rohrbeck P, et al. Deployment-Associated Exposure Surveillance With High-Resolution Metabolomics. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine / American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2016;58(8 Suppl 1):S12–21. doi: 10.1097/jom.0000000000000768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Sun X, Sui H, Fisher JT, Yan Z, Liu X, Cho HJ, et al. Disease phenotype of a ferret CFTR-knockout model of cystic fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(9):3149–60. Epub 20100825. doi: 10.1172/jci43052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Yuan F, Gasser GN, Lemire E, Montoro DT, Jagadeesh K, Zhang Y, et al. Transgenic ferret models define pulmonary ionocyte diversity and function. Nature. 2023;621(7980):857–67. Epub 20230920. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06549-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Wan Y, Hudson R, Smith J, Forman-Kay JD, Ditlev JA. Protein interactions, calcium, phosphorylation, and cholesterol modulate CFTR cluster formation on membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025;122(11):e2424470122. Epub 20250310. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2424470122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Abu-Arish A, Pandžić E, Luo Y, Sato Y, Turner MJ, Wiseman PW, et al. Lipid-driven CFTR clustering is impaired in cystic fibrosis and restored by corrector drugs. J Cell Sci. 2022;135(5). Epub 20220307. doi: 10.1242/jcs.259002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Castellani S, Guerra L, Favia M, Di Gioia S, Casavola V, Conese M. NHERF1 and CFTR restore tight junction organisation and function in cystic fibrosis airway epithelial cells: role of ezrin and the RhoA/ROCK pathway. Lab Invest. 2012;92(11):1527–40. Epub 20120910. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2012.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Li J, Callaway DJ, Bu Z. Ezrin induces long-range interdomain allostery in the scaffolding protein NHERF1. J Mol Biol. 2009;392(1):166–80. Epub 20090708. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Dorff TB, Goldman B, Pinski JK, Mack PC, Lara PN Jr., Van Veldhuizen PJ Jr., et al. Clinical and correlative results of SWOG S0354: a phase II trial of CNTO328 (siltuximab), a monoclonal antibody against interleukin-6, in chemotherapy-pretreated patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(11):3028–34. Epub 2010/05/21. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-3122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Lau AG, Hall RA. Oligomerization of NHERF-1 and NHERF-2 PDZ domains: differential regulation by association with receptor carboxyl-termini and by phosphorylation. Biochemistry. 2001;40(29):8572–80. doi: 10.1021/bi0103516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Paquet M, Asay MJ, Fam SR, Inuzuka H, Castleberry AM, Oller H, et al. The PDZ scaffold NHERF-2 interacts with mGluR5 and regulates receptor activity. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(40):29949–61. Epub 20060804. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M602262200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Mamonova T, Kurnikova M, Friedman PA. Structural basis for NHERF1 PDZ domain binding. Biochemistry. 2012;51(14):3110–20. Epub 20120327. doi: 10.1021/bi201213w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Hajizadeh NR, Pieprzyk J, Skopintsev P, Flayhan A, Svergun DI, Löw C. Probing the Architecture of a Multi-PDZ Domain Protein: Structure of PDZK1 in Solution. Structure. 2018;26(11):1522–33.e5. Epub 20180913. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2018.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Beatch M, Jesaitis LA, Gallin WJ, Goodenough DA, Stevenson BR. The tight junction protein ZO-2 contains three PDZ (PSD-95/Discs-Large/ZO-1) domains and an alternatively spliced region. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(42):25723–6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.42.25723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Bossard F, Silantieff E, Lavazais-Blancou E, Robay A, Sagan C, Rozec B, et al. β1, β2, and β3 adrenoceptors and Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor 1 expression in human bronchi and their modifications in cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011;44(1):91–8. Epub 20100304. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0372OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Bezzerri V, Gentili V, Api M, Finotti A, Papi C, Tamanini A, et al. SARS-CoV-2 viral entry and replication is impaired in Cystic Fibrosis airways due to ACE2 downregulation. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):132. Epub 20230110. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-35862-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Tabeling C, Yu H, Wang L, Ranke H, Goldenberg NM, Zabini D, et al. CFTR and sphingolipids mediate hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(13):E1614–23. Epub 20150317. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421190112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Guggino WB. The cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator forms macromolecular complexes with PDZ domain scaffold proteins. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2004;1(1):28–32. doi: 10.1513/pats.2306011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Raghuram V, Mak DO, Foskett JK. Regulation of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator single-channel gating by bivalent PDZ-domain-mediated interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(3):1300–5. Epub 20010123. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.3.1300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Kim JY, Han W, Namkung W, Lee JH, Kim KH, Shin H, et al. Inhibitory regulation of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator anion-transporting activities by Shank2. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(11):10389–96. Epub 20031216. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312871200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Tandon C, De Lisle RC, Boulatnikov I, Naik PK. Interaction of carboxyl-terminal peptides of cytosolic-tail of apactin with PDZ domains of NHERF/EBP50 and PDZK-1/CAP70. Mol Cell Biochem. 2007;302(1–2):157–67. Epub 20070328. doi: 10.1007/s11010-007-9437-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Ruan YC, Wang Y, Da Silva N, Kim B, Diao RY, Hill E, et al. CFTR interacts with ZO-1 to regulate tight junction assembly and epithelial differentiation through the ZONAB pathway. J Cell Sci. 2014;127(Pt 20):4396–408. Epub 20140808. doi: 10.1242/jcs.148098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Kim JK, Kwon O, Kim J, Kim EK, Park HK, Lee JE, et al. PDZ domain-containing 1 (PDZK1) protein regulates phospholipase C-β3 (PLC-β3)-specific activation of somatostatin by forming a ternary complex with PLC-β3 and somatostatin receptors. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(25):21012–24. Epub 20120423. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.337865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Lu Y, Zhu Q, Fox DM, Gao C, Stanley SA, Luo K. SARS-CoV-2 down-regulates ACE2 through lysosomal degradation. Mol Biol Cell. 2022;33(14):ar147. Epub 20221026. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E22-02-0045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Riazanski V, Gabdoulkhakova AG, Boynton LS, Eguchi RR, Deriy LV, Hogarth DK, et al. TRPC6 channel translocation into phagosomal membrane augments phagosomal function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(47):E6486–95. Epub 20151110. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518966112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Mariño-Ramírez L, Kann MG, Shoemaker BA, Landsman D. Histone structure and nucleosome stability. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2005;2(5):719–29. doi: 10.1586/14789450.2.5.719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Cutter AR, Hayes JJ. A brief review of nucleosome structure. FEBS Lett. 2015;589(20 Pt A):2914–22. Epub 20150514. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Gujar H, Weisenberger DJ, Liang G. The Roles of Human DNA Methyltransferases and Their Isoforms in Shaping the Epigenome. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(2). Epub 20190223. doi: 10.3390/genes10020172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Arif KMT, Elliott EK, Haupt LM, Griffiths LR. Regulatory Mechanisms of Epigenetic miRNA Relationships in Human Cancer and Potential as Therapeutic Targets. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(10). Epub 20201011. doi: 10.3390/cancers12102922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Colpaert RMW, Calore M. Epigenetics and microRNAs in cardiovascular diseases. Genomics. 2021;113(2):540–51. Epub 20210120. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.12.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Morgan MAJ, Shilatifard A. Epigenetic moonlighting: Catalytic-independent functions of histone modifiers in regulating transcription. Sci Adv. 2023;9(16):eadg6593. Epub 20230421. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg6593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Zhou Y, Li ZL, Ding L, Zhang XJ, Liu NC, Liu SS, et al. Long noncoding RNA SNHG5 promotes podocyte injury via the microRNA-26a-5p/TRPC6 pathway in diabetic nephropathy. J Biol Chem. 2022;298(12):102605. Epub 20221017. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Dang X, Ma A, Yang L, Hu H, Zhu B, Shang D, et al. MicroRNA-26a regulates tumorigenic properties of EZH2 in human lung carcinoma cells. Cancer Genet. 2012;205(3):113–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2012.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Li Y, Zhang M, Feng H, Mahati S. The Tumorigenic Properties of EZH2 are Mediated by MiR-26a in Uveal Melanoma. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:713542. Epub 20210726. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.713542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Wang L, Jin Q, Lee JE, Su IH, Ge K. Histone H3K27 methyltransferase Ezh2 represses Wnt genes to facilitate adipogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(16):7317–22. Epub 20100405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000031107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Rokavec M, Hermeking H. miRTARGET: An integrated web tool for the identification of microRNA targets with potential therapeutic or prognostic value in cancer. Neoplasia. 2025;67:101202. Epub 20250624. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2025.101202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Azmi AS, Li Y, Aboukameel A, Muqbil I, Philip PA, Mohammad RM. DNA-Methylation-Caused Downregulation of miR-30 Contributes to the High Expression of XPO1 and the Aggressive Growth of Tumors in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(8). Epub 20190802. doi: 10.3390/cancers11081101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Harney E, Paterson S, Collin H, Chan BHK, Bennett D, Plaistow SJ. Pollution induces epigenetic effects that are stably transmitted across multiple generations. Evol Lett. 2022;6(2):118–35. Epub 20220203. doi: 10.1002/evl3.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Fu T, Tian H, Rong H, Ai P, Li X. LncRNA PVT1 induces apoptosis and inflammatory response of bronchial epithelial cells by regulating miR-30b-5p/BCL2L11 axis in COPD. Genes Environ. 2023;45(1):24. Epub 20231010. doi: 10.1186/s41021-023-00283-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Zeng P, Yang J, Liu L, Yang X, Yao Z, Ma C, et al. ERK1/2 inhibition reduces vascular calcification by activating miR-126-3p-DKK1/LRP6 pathway. Theranostics. 2021;11(3):1129–46. Epub 20210101. doi: 10.7150/thno.49771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Zhu Y, Han Y, Almuntashiri S, Dutta S, Wang X, Owen CA, et al. Dysregulation of miR-103a Mediates Cigarette Smoking-induced Lipid-laden Macrophage Formation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2022;67(6):695–707. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2022-0202OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Massara L, Gosset P. MicroRNA Control Lipid-laden Alveolar Macrophages in Smokers: A Potential Therapeutic Target for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease? Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2022;67(6):619–20. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2022-0338ED. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Braun M, Fromm EL, Gerber A, Klingelhöfer D, Müller R, Groneberg DA. Particulate matter emissions of four types of one cigarette brand with and without additives: a laser spectrometric particulate matter analysis of secondhand smoke. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e024400. Epub 20190115. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Clunes LA, Davies CM, Coakley RD, Aleksandrov AA, Henderson AG, Zeman KL, et al. Cigarette smoke exposure induces CFTR internalization and insolubility, leading to airway surface liquid dehydration. Faseb j. 2012;26(2):533–45. Epub 20111011. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-192377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Wang H, Cebotaru L, Lee HW, Yang Q, Pollard BS, Pollard HB, et al. CFTR Controls the Activity of NF-kappaB by Enhancing the Degradation of TRADD. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2016;40(5):1063–78. Epub 2016/12/14. doi: 10.1159/000453162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Ware LB, Soleymanlou N, McAuley DF, Estrada V, Diaz GA, Lacamera P, et al. TRPC6 inhibitor (BI 764198) to reduce risk and severity of ARDS due to COVID-19: a phase II randomised controlled trial. Thorax. 2023;78(8):816–24. Epub 20230406. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2022-219668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Zeitlin PL, Diener-West M, Callahan KA, Lee S, Talbot CC Jr., Pollard B, et al. Digitoxin for Airway Inflammation in Cystic Fibrosis: Preliminary Assessment of Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Dose Finding. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(2):220–9. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201608-649OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Liu Y, Yang Q. The roles of EZH2 in cancer and its inhibitors. Med Oncol. 2023;40(6):167. Epub 20230506. doi: 10.1007/s12032-023-02025-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Xie W, Chu Q, Brea L, Zeng G, Wang Y, Lu X, et al. EZH2 PROTACs outperform catalytic inhibitors in prostate cancer by targeting a methylation-independent function of PRC2. Oncogene. 2026;45(5):636–49. Epub 20260107. doi: 10.1038/s41388-025-03662-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Guo Y, Cheng R, Wang Y, Gonzalez ME, Zhang H, Liu Y, et al. Regulation of EZH2 protein stability: new mechanisms, roles in tumorigenesis, and roads to the clinic. EBioMedicine. 2024;100:104972. Epub 20240119. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.104972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Alexandrov K, Rojas M, Rolando C. DNA damage by benzo(a)pyrene in human cells is increased by cigarette smoke and decreased by a filter containing rosemary extract, which lowers free radicals. Cancer research. 2006;66(24):11938–45. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-06-3277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES