Abstract
Rhizopus microsporus is a major cause of mucormycosis, an infection caused by Mucorales that increasingly affects immunocompromised individuals. Certain isolates of R. microsporus harbor bacterial endosymbionts that regulate key fungal functions, particularly asexual and sexual reproduction, but these effects have been explored exclusively in environmental isolates. Although some clinical isolates contain Mycetohabitans endosymbionts, their influence on fungal reproduction remains unknown. This dependence on endosymbionts for asexual spore formation in environmental isolates has established the Rhizopus–Mycetohabitans association as a model for studying fungal-bacterial endosymbiosis, but it has also constrained comparative studies across environmental and clinical backgrounds. We show that light exposure partially restores asexual sporulation in endosymbiont-cured environmental strains, enabling the generation of isogenic sporulating lines. Transcriptomic analyses revealed that both light and endobacteria modulate overlapping signal transduction pathways, regulating the expression of conserved genes involved in asexual development in Mucorales and other fungi. Functional assays demonstrated that asexual spores from cured strains are viable; however, the presence of endosymbionts accelerates spore formation, enhances osmotic stress tolerance, and helps maintain cell-wall integrity. Cured strains exhibit altered membrane composition, including reduced ergosterol levels, which may contribute to their resistance to macrophage phagocytosis. Despite these compensatory adaptations, cured strains showed attenuated virulence in a murine mucormycosis model, highlighting the role of bacterial endosymbionts in fungal pathogenicity. The discovery of light-induced sporulation in cured strains provides a valuable experimental framework for future comparative studies requiring asexual spores, offering new opportunities to explore the role of fungal-bacterial endosymbiosis in fungal biology and human disease.
Keywords: light-induced sporulation, endosymbiosis, Rhizopus microsporus, endobacteria, fungal fitness, virulence
Introduction
Endosymbiosis is a powerful evolutionary strategy that enables microorganisms to adapt to diverse environments by sharing or extending metabolic functions, defense mechanisms, and developmental programs [1–3]. In fungi, intracellular bacterial symbionts are increasingly recognized as major drivers of ecological versatility, shaping host fitness, nutrient acquisition, reproduction, and virulence [4–7]. These associations, often vertically transmitted through spores, can persist over evolutionary timescales and lead to deep metabolic integration, with the symbiotic unit functioning as a single level of selection [4, 6, 8]. Despite their ecological and evolutionary importance, the mechanisms by which endosymbionts manipulate fungal physiology and how hosts accommodate or resist such control remain only partially understood, particularly in early-diverging fungal lineages such as the Mucoromycota. This phylum includes both the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi members of Glomeromycota and the order Mucorales [5, 8, 9].
One of the best characterized examples of fungal-bacterial symbiosis occurs in Rhizopus microsporus, a member of the order Mucorales. In this species, some strains are unable to establish symbiosis with bacteria and are therefore considered non-host, whereas host strains harbor intracellular bacteria of the genus Mycetohabitans (formerly Burkholderia), which are transmitted vertically by fungal reproduction [10, 11]. This association causes rice seedling blight, mediated by rhizoxin, a bacterial toxin used by the fungus as a phytopathogenicity factor [12–14] and protection against micropredators [15]. In recent years, the Rhizopus-Mycetohabitans system has become a model for exploring molecular dynamics of fungal-bacterial endosymbiosis, revealing bacterial contributions to fungal morphogenesis, metabolism, and environmental interactions [8, 10, 11, 16]. Endosymbionts have been also detected in some clinical Mucorales isolates, yet there is no evidence currently associating them to mucormycosis pathogenesis [17–19]. Rhizopus spp., and other Mucorales, cause mucormycosis, a life-threatening fungal infection whose incidence has increased in immunocompromised populations and showed a marked rise during the recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic [20–22]. Although the infection process is not yet fully understood, studies indicate that host tissue invasion begins with the recognition of specific host receptors by fungal CotH proteins, which mediate adhesion and invasion [23, 24]. This process is further enhanced by the release of the potent mycotoxin mucoricin, which plays a central role in tissue necrosis [25]. Moreover, interactions between fungal cells and host immune cells trigger major remodeling of gene expression networks governing survival and germination within phagosomes, nutrient acquisition, and oxidative stress responses [26]. Changes in cell wall structure or composition may also influence virulence; e.g. avirulent strains of Mucor lusitanicus display reduced tolerance to cell wall stressors such as calcofluor white and sodium dodecyl sulfate compared with virulent strains [27]. The contribution of endosymbiotic bacteria to enhanced fungal pathogenesis remains a controversial issue that requires further investigation to elucidate their biological role.
In R. microsporus, elimination of Mycetohabitans results in a failure to produce sporangiospores and a reduction of zygospore formation [10, 11, 28], restricting comparative studies that depend on spore-derived inocula [10, 29]. This dependence highlights the importance of elucidating host and bacterial regulatory mechanisms. Asexual reproduction, essential for fungal propagation and survival under diverse environmental conditions, is controlled by a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors such as nutrient availability, pH, humidity, host interactions, and light [30, 31]. Although sporulation is well characterized in fungi such as Aspergillus nidulans [32, 33] and Neurospora crassa [33–35], the genetic mechanisms governing this process in Mucorales remain poorly defined [36–38]. In fact, only a few transcriptional regulators, most notably those linked to the white-collar complex (WCC), have been identified in this early-diverging fungi [39, 40]. Light acts as a key regulator of fungal development [40], not only in Mucorales but also in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi where it interacts with root exudates to influence hyphal branching [41]. In addition, recent studies have identified bacterial-derived factors, such as TALE-like effectors and secondary metabolites, that modulate host sporulation [42–46], suggesting a dominant contribution of the bacterial partner to this developmental process [42–45, 47].
To further elucidate the role of endosymbionts in R. microsporus biology, we sought to determine how symbiosis controls asexual sporulation and the subsequent consequences for fungal fitness and virulence. To address this question, we developed a reliable method to induce sporulation in environmental strains cured of their endosymbionts, thereby enabling direct, controlled comparisons between symbiotic and aposymbiotic fungal states. The use of standardized spore suspensions rather than mycelial fragments allows for greater precision and reproducibility in experiments. Our findings reveal that bacterial endosymbionts control key genes in sporulation and profoundly influence the fitness and pathogenic potential of R. microsporus, providing a robust framework for dissecting the molecular basis of this facultative mutualistic relationship and its broader implications for fungal biology, ecology, and potential pathogenesis.
Materials and methods
Fungal strains and generation of cured Rhizopus strains
Environmental R. microsporus strains ATCC 52813 and ATCC 52814, both harboring the endobacteria Mycetohabitans endofungorum (formerly Burkholderia endofungorum; isolates HKI 0402/B4/B13 and HKI 0403/B7/B14, respectively), were used. The naturally endobacteria-free strain ATCC 11559 was included as a control. Endobacteria from both strains were eradicate after treating fresh sporangiospores with 20–40 μg/ml of ciprofloxacin (Acros Organics, China) [10], thereafter referred as cured strains or ATCC 52813 (−) and ATCC 52814 (−) in contrast to non-cured or ATCC 52813 (+) and ATCC 52814 (+). Successful endobacteria curation was validated by (i) PCR amplification of the 23S rRNA gene with GlomGiGf [48] and LSU483r [49] primers, (ii) absence of rhizoxin production by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry [15, 50], (iii) lack of SYTO9-stained endobacteria under confocal microscopy using the Live/Dead BacLight Bacterial Viability Kit (Invitrogen, #L7012) [51, 52], and (iv) absence of bacterial reads in RNA-seq datasets (see Supplementary File 1 for details).
Sporulation stimulation in cured strains
In order to explore different nutritive media as inductors of sporulation, potato dextrose agar (PDA), half-diluted PDA (½PDA), potato carrot agar (PCA), yeast peptone glucose agar (YPG), oatmeal agar (OAT), and malt extract agar (MEA) were used. All plates were incubated at room temperature in darkness, 12 h light-cycles or under continuous light [Osram Led White Light bulb (LED CLA100 13 W)] for 5–10 days. Sporulation was monitored periodically by stereoscopic microscope at 10x (LEICA EZ4, Wetzlar, Germany).
Sporangiospores were collected by flooding grown mycelium with 0.1% Tween-20 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; OXOID, Hampshire, England), scraping with a loop, and washing twice with PBS. The suspension was filtered through sterile gauze, centrifuged at 5000 × g for 5 min, and washed with distilled sterile water. The resulting spore pellet was used for subsequent assays.
Phenotypic characterization of R. microsporus strains
For radial growth, a 10 μl drop of spore suspension containing 3–5 × 103 sporangiospores was spotted at the center of PDA, ½ PDA, and PCA plates in duplicate. Plates were incubated at room temperature under dark and continuous light exposure. After 48 and 72 h, colony diameters were determined from scanned images using ImageJ/FIJI software version 1.53t [53].
Sporulation rate was quantified by harvesting sporangiospores after measuring mycelial growth and counted using a hemocytometer. The total spore number was normalized to the mycelial area to determine the number of spores per cm2 [36]. For determination of time of germination, 1 ml of a 5 × 105 sporangiospores/ml suspension was incubated at 30°C in RPMI 1640 medium (buffered with MOPS, pH 7.0) with constant shaking at 125 rpm. Germ tube emergence was monitored hourly for up to 6 h using optical microscopy. Germination rates were calculated as the number of sporangiospores showing a germ tube out of 100 cells per sample [54], and viability by colony-forming unit (CFU) counting on PDA plates.
Sensitivity to different stress conditions was evaluated by radial growth after seeding 10 μl of sporangiospore suspension (3–5 × 103 sporangiospores/plate) onto the center of PDA plates supplemented with sorbitol (3 M), NaCl (0.5 M), KCl (0.5 M), H2O2 (200 mM), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; 50 μg/ml), calcofluor white (CFW; 250 μg/ml) or congo red (CR; 1 mg/ml) [27]. Plates were incubated at 30°C for 48 h in darkness, and colony diameters measured using ImageJ/FIJI software. Non-supplemented PDA medium was used as the control.
For melanin and ergosterol quantification, 1 × 104 sporangiospores were inoculated in 200 ml of potato dextrose broth (BD Difco Sparks, MD, USA) and incubated at 30°C and 250 rpm under laboratory conditions (12 h light-cycles), darkness and continuous light exposure for 5 days. The resulting biomass was lyophilized and ground to a fine powder for subsequent analyses. For total melanin quantification, 20 mg of lyophilized biomass, were resuspended in 0.5 ml of 1 N NaOH solution with 10% DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) and quantified spectrophotometrically at 405 nm using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) [55]. For ergosterol quantification, 60 mg of lyophilized biomass were extracted with 25% (w/v) KOH/EtOH solution prepared by dissolving 25 g of KOH in 35 ml of sterile distilled water and bringing the final volume to 100 ml with 100% ethanol. Then absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 230 and 300 nm (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) [56].
In all assays, spore viability was confirmed by performing serial dilutions of spore suspensions, plating 100 μl onto PDA plates, and incubating at 30°C for 2–3 days prior to colony counting.
Sexual mating assay
Sexual crosses were performed by placing a mycelial agar plug from the “minus” mating type strain (ATCC 52814) and the “plus” mating type strain (ATCC 52813) on opposite sides of PDA, ½ PDA, and PCA plates in duplicate. Plates were incubated at 30°C in darkness or under continuous light exposure for 10 days. Successful sexual interaction was confirmed by the appearance of a yellow pigmentation line, resulting from β-carotene accumulation, and the formation of zygospores at the contact zone.
Scanning and transmission electron microscopy
For scanning electron microscopy, mycelia from 7-days PDA cultures were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 24 h, post-fixed with 2% osmium tetroxide at 4°C, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, and infiltrated with amyl acetate. Samples were dried using a critical point dryer (CPD 030, BAL-TEC) and sputter-coated with gold before observation in a Quanta 600 scanning electron microscope (FEI, Eindhoven, Netherlands).
For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), mycelia were embedded in 0.6% agar, cut into 2 × 2 mm cubes, and processed as described previously [57]. Samples were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde—2% paraformaldehyde, post-fixed in 2% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated through an ethanol series, stained with uranyl acetate, and embedded in Spurr’s resin [57]. Ultrathin sections were examined under a transmission electron microscope (JEM 1011, JEOL, Japan) at 80 kV at the Scientific and Technical Resources Service (SRCiT) of the Rovira i Virgili University (see Supplementary File 1 for details).
Antifungal susceptibility testing
Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of amphotericin B, voriconazole, posaconazole and itraconazole, all purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) were determined using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M38-A2 broth microdilution method [58]. The MIC was defined as the lowest antifungal concentration that resulted in complete inhibition of visible growth (100% inhibition for all drugs). Aspergillus flavus ATCC 204304 was included as a quality control strain in all assays.
Transcriptomic analysis
R. microsporus strains ATCC 52814 (+) and ATCC 52814 (−) were seeded on the center of ½ PDA plates (3–5 × 103 sporangiospores/plate) and incubated at 30°C in dark or continuous light for 72 h. Mycelia were harvested, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and ground to a fine powder. Total RNA was extracted from 50 mg of mycelia using the NZY Total RNA Isolation kit (NZYtech, Portugal) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and genomic DNA was removed with DNase I. Samples were obtained from three different sets of plates for each growth condition. RNA integrity was quality-checked using the Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). RNA-seq libraries were prepared and sequenced by Novogene using NovaSeq 6000 System (Illumina). Raw reads were quality-checked with FastQC (v0.12.1) and trimmed using Trimmomatic (v0.30) [59]. Reads with Phred quality <33 or length < 20 bp were discarded. Filtered reads were aligned to the R. microsporus ATCC 52814 reference genome (available at JGI Mycoscosm Portal: https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/Rhimi_ATCC52814_1) using HISAT2 (v2.2.0) [60]. Raw counts were calculated with featureCounts (v2.0.3) [61] and differential gene expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 (v1.30.0) [62] (P value <.05 and |logFC| > 1 as cutoff). Coverage bigWigs were generated with deepTools (v3.1) [63] using 1x coverage normalization for all samples and visualized using Integrative Genomic Viewer (IGV, v.2.17.0) [64]. Heatmaps were produced using the pheatmap R package (v1.0.12; Canberra distance, Ward clustering). GO annotations were retrieved from the R. microsporus ATCC 52814 annotation generated in this work and available at Mycocosm (https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/ Rhimi_ATCC52814_1) and evaluated using 2x2 contingency tables for compare the number of genes with/without GO the specific annotation in the gene set of interest versus the background/reference genome. Fisher’s exact test and False Discovery Rate were calculated using R built-in functions. A P value of .05 was used as a cutoff for the identification of enriched terms (Fisher’s exact test). IGV (v2.17.0) [64] was used for manual quality control of the data and snapshot generation of selected genes.
The presence of bacterial reads in RNA-seq datasets generated from total RNA isolation from cured and non-cured ATCC 52814 strains were analyzed using Kraken2 software (v2.1.3) [65], which assigns taxonomic labels to every sequencing read in the dataset. Results were inspected for Mycetohabitans-derived reads and taxonomic distribution was visualized using Krona (v 2.7.1) [66].
In vitro and in vivo virulence assays
The murine macrophage-like cell line J774A.1 was maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM; Biowest, Nuaillé, France) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Biowest, Nuaillé, France). For infection assays, 5 × 104 cells/well were seeded in 24-well plates with serum-free DMEM (sfDMEM) and incubated overnight. Cells were infected with resting or swollen spores (previously incubated for 3 h in DMEM) from cured and non-cured strains of R. microsporus at 2.5 × 105 sporangiospores/ml for a multiplicity of infection of 1:5. After 1 h of incubation, the supernatant containing non-phagocytized spores was removed and cultures were incubated with fresh medium for an additional 4 h. Then, macrophages were lysed with sterile cold distilled water, the lysates collected, and plated on PDA to determine the number of intracellular surviving spores, expressed as CFU/ml.
For in vivo assay, 1-month-old male Swiss mice weighing 30 g (Animal Facilities Services, University of Murcia, Spain) were housed in groups of ten per cage with food and water ad libitum. Mice were challenged intravenously by retroorbital injection of 1 × 106 sporangiospores/animal [67, 68]. R. microsporus strain UM1, which is auxotrophic for uracil (pyrF−), was used as an avirulent control strain [67]. Prior to infection, animals were anesthetized with isoflurane and monitored until full recovery. Mice were checked twice daily for 15 days.
All animal procedures complied with the European Union Council (Directive 2010/63/EU) and Spanish legislation (RD 53/2013) and protocols were approved by the Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of the University of Murcia and the Department of Water, Agriculture, Farming, Fishing, Environment, and Emergencies of the Government of Murcia (Consejería de Agua, Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca, Medio Ambiente y Emergencias de la Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia), Spain (authorization number A13180108).
Detection of lipase activity
Lipase activity was assessed after 3 days of growth at 30°C in peptone agar medium (peptone 10 g; NaCl 5 g; CaCl2·2H2O 0.1 g; agar 20 g; distilled water 1 L; phenol red 0.1 g; pH = 6.0). Enzymatic activity was evidenced either by the formation of calcium salt precipitates or by the appearance of a clear yellow halo around the colony, indicating complete degradation of fatty acid salts [69].
Statistical analysis
All data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism software, Version 8.2.0 for Windows (GraphPad Inc., San Diego, CA USA). Depending on the dataset, nonparametric tests, unpaired t-tests, or One/Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test were applied, as indicated in the figure legends. All measurements were performed with at least two technical and three biological replicates. Survival rates were plotted in Kaplan–Meier curves, and differences in pathogenicity between fungal strains were analyzed using the log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. P values ≤.05 were considered statistically significant in all assays.
Results
Light induces sporulation in endosymbiont-free strains
Environmental host strains of R. microsporus harboring endosymbionts, such as ATCC 52813 and ATCC 52814, both used in the present study, are unable to sporulate in their absence, whereas non-host strains such as ATCC 11559 do not harbor endobacteria and can sporulate normally [10, 11]. Studying the role of endobacteria in fungal cellular functions and broader phenotypic traits, such as virulence, requires the generation of endobacteria-free sporangiospores. Antibiotic treatment completely eradicated the endosymbionts from both strains as neither 23S rRNA amplification nor rhizoxin production was detected. Confocal microscopy confirmed the absence of bacterial cells in both resting and germinated spores. To evaluate whether nutrient composition could induce sporulation, the cured (−) and non-cured (+) strains, as well as the control strain ATCC 11559, were grown on different media (PDA, ½ PDA, PCA, YPG, MEA 1%, and OAT) under continuous darkness. As expected, control and non-cured strains sporulated abundantly on all tested media (Supplementary Fig. 1). In contrast, cured strains failed to produce sporangia in darkness, confirming that endobacteria are essential for asexual sporulation when cultivated under continuous darkness. Only when exposed to continuous light, sporulation was induced in cured strains in all media, being such effect more pronounced on PCA, ½ PDA, and PDA, where the reduced hyphal density facilitated visualization of sporangia after 10 days (Fig. 1A). Light exposure also enhanced sporulation in non-cured and control strains. Scanning electron microscopy analysis revealed that the sporangia and sporangiospores of cured strains were morphologically indistinguishable from those of non-cured strains (Fig. 1B). To confirm that asexual sporulation observed in cured strains was not due to the presence of residual endobacteria, several complementary analyses were performed. No amplification of the endobacterial 23S rRNA gene was detected in DNA samples from cured strains (Fig. 2A). Likewise, confocal microscopy revealed no bacterial cells in either resting or germinated spores of the cured strains (Fig. 2B). In addition, rhizoxin, a hallmark metabolite synthesized by Mycetohabitans endobacteria [70], was undetectable in the cured strains (Fig. 2C and D). Taken together, these results strongly support that the cured R. microsporus strains can undergo asexual sporulation when exposed to continuous light.
Figure 1.
Sporulation induction in cured R. microsporus strains by light. (A) Vegetative growth of strains ATCC 52813 and ATCC 52814 with (+) and without (−) endobacteria on different media after 10 days of incubation at 30°C under continuous darkness or light exposure. Representative sporangia and mycelia observed in the stereomicroscope (10x) are shown below each growth plate. The white arrowhead indicates sporangia formation in cured strains. White dots visible in some images correspond to water droplets. (B) Scanning electron microscopy images of sporangium (top) and sporangiospores (bottom) of the strain ATCC 52814 with (left) and without (right) endobacteria (scale bar: 10 μm).
Figure 2.
Validation of endobacteria elimination in R. microsporus host strains. (A) PCR validation using endobacteria-specific primers for the 23S rRNA gene. (B) Mycetohabitans detection in resting and germinated sporangiospores of ATCC 52814 (+) and ATCC 52814 (−). Using confocal microscopy. Endobacteria was visualized with SYTO 9, and fungal cell wall was stained with calcofluor white (CFW). Scale bar = 5 μm. (C) HPLC chromatogram with detection at 310 nm of crude extracts obtained from 4-day-old cultures of R. microsporus ATCC 11559, ATCC 52814 (+), and ATCC 52814 (−). ATCC 11559 was used as a negative control, while the Mycetohabitans-harboring strain ATCC 52814 (+) served as a positive control. (D) Ion chromatograms for Rhizoxin S1 (m/z 314.3324, top) and Rhizoxin S2 (m/z 628.3480, bottom).
Quantification of sporulation on PCA medium in cured strains, which failed to sporulate in darkness, showed that light exposure induced sporangia formation. This effect became noticeable at shorter incubation times (Fig. 3A), confirming the role of light as a sporulation inducer. Sporangiospore yields in both cured strains (≈103 sporangiospores/cm2) remained markedly lower than those of non-cured and control strains (≈106 sporangiospores/cm2), indicating that light cannot fully compensate for the absence of the endobacteria-driven regulatory mechanism. Germination assays showed that sporangiospores from cured strains were fully viable, although complete germination was delayed in comparison to their non-cured counterpart (Fig. 3B). Together with scanning electron microscopy observations, these results indicate that sporangia and sporangiospore development proceed normally, both structurally and functionally, in the absence of endobacteria. Furthermore, under 72 h of dark incubation, the presence of endosymbionts significantly enhanced radial growth in ½ PDA and PCA (Fig. 3C), with ATCC 52814 (+) exceeding 2.6 cm/day, whereas its cured counterpart did not surpass 1.85 cm/day under either dark or light conditions (Supplementary Fig. 2). In particular, light markedly increased radial expansion in control and uncured strains, but had no significant effect on the cured strains at 48 h (Fig. 3D).
Figure 3.
Impact of endobacteria and light on phenotypic changes in R. microsporus. (A) Asexual sporulation rate under dark and light conditions on PCA media after 5 and 10 days of growth. The dashed red lines represent the limit for spore counting using a Neubauer chamber. (B) Percentage of germinated spores in RPMI media over 6 h, normalized by spore viability. nd: Indicates not determined values. (C) Effect of different media on mycelial radial growth under dark conditions at 72 h. color legend as in (B). (D) Effect of light and dark on mycelial radial growth on PDA, ½ PDA, and PCA agar plates at 48 h. Bar plots represent the mean ± standard deviation of at least three replicates. Significant differences were determined using two-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey’s test; (*) P ≤ .05; (**) P ≤ .001.
Endobacteria not only control asexual sporulation but also sexual reproduction [11]. To investigate the role of light in sexual reproduction, sex-compatible strains ATCC 52813 and ATCC 52814 were crossed under continuous light exposure. Non-cured strains mated successfully, whereas cured strains failed (Supplementary Fig. 3), indicating that light cannot substitute endobacterial role in regulating sexual reproduction.
Sporulation induction by light and endosymbionts share regulatory pathways
To gain insight into the regulatory mechanism governing asexual sporulation in R. microsporus, we performed a comparative transcriptomic analysis between ATCC 52814 (+) and ATCC 52814 (−) under continuous dark and light conditions (Fig. 4A). Sequencing reads confirmed the presence of Mycetohabitans endosymbionts in non-cured strain, whereas no bacterial reads were detected in the cured strain (Table S1 and Supplementary File 2), validating the successful removal of endosymbionts.
Figure 4.

Environmental regulatory mechanisms in response to light exposure and endobacteria presence. (A) Schematic representation of the growth conditions used in this assay. Mycelium from R. microsporus cured (−) and non-cured (+) strains grown under dark and light conditions was collected for RNA-seq. (B) RDA plot for multivariance analysis of environmental conditions (light/dark) and bacteria presence or absence. The effect of each component is indicated in the axis. (C) Heatmap of log2FC values for all genes across all comparisons. Clustering was performed using Canberra distance and Ward’s method. (D) Venn diagrams showing intersections between upregulated (left) and downregulated (right) genes. (E) GO enrichment (molecular function) for upregulated genes in light, bacteria, and light + bacteria conditions. (F) Genome browser snapshots showing RNA coverage for the three indicated genes (scale bar = 500 bp). Data represents the analysis of sample triplicates.
Transcriptomic analysis revealed that the presence of endobacteria was the primary driver of gene expression differences overshadowing the influence of light exposure, with a significant higher number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the cured and non-cured strain in the light than in the dark (Supplementary Fig. 4A). Specifically, bacterial presence explained 59.4% of the constrained variance in gene expression (F = 21.4, RDA analysis, P < .001), while light conditions accounted for an additional 15.8% (F = 6.0, P = .002) (Fig. 4B). In addition, endosymbiont enhances the transcriptional response to light as 2441 DEGs were found when comparing light vs. dark conditions in the non-cured strain, whereas only 253 DEGs were detected when comparing light vs. dark conditions in the cured strain (Supplementary Fig. 4A). Interestingly, comparisons of gene expression regulated solely by light or solely by the endosymbiont revealed similar expression patterns. This was particularly evident in the comparison of the non-cured vs. cured strain under light exposure [(+) Light / (−) Light] and non-cured strain in light vs. dark conditions [(+) Light / (+) Dark], which shared the most similar transcriptional profiles (Fig. 4C). These similarities suggest that the signal transduction pathways activated by each stimulus converge on some common regulatory mechanisms. Additionally, several genes shared a common expression pattern between conditions promoting sporulation, either via light in the cured strain [(−) Light / (−) Dark] or via endosymbionts in the dark [(+) Dark / (−) Dark] (Fig. 4C).
To characterize the regulatory pathways underlying environmental responses to light exposure and endosymbiont presence, we analyzed the functional classification of genes regulated by signaling pathways responding to each stimulus. In total, 2608 genes (1923 upregulated and 685 downregulated) responded to light in the cured strain (comparison: (−) Light / (−) Dark) and non-cured strain (comparison: (+) Light / (+) Dark) (Fig. 4D). Analogously, 4697 genes (2430 upregulated and 2167 downregulated) changed their expression in response to the endosymbiont presence (comparisons: (+) Light / (−) Light and (+) Dark / (−) Dark) (Fig. 4D). Functional enrichment analysis revealed that both stimuli, light and endobacteria presence, activated similar biological processes, including transmembrane transport, tetrapyrrole binding, and chitinase and cell wall remodeling activities (Fig. 4E). This suggests that R. microsporus activates similar molecular pathways in response to both light exposure and the presence of endosymbionts. The HOG pathway has been reported to be upregulated during the establishment of these symbiotic relationships [71]. We investigated how the components of this regulatory pathway behaved in our expression data. In addition to confirming the activation of the orthologs of Hog1, Ssk1, Gdp1, and diacylglycerol kinases (DGKs) in the comparisons of endobacteria presence/absence, we detected stronger activation of these genes under light conditions compared to dark conditions, as well as the activation of some components, such as Gdp1 and DGKs, in the presence of light even in the absence of bacteria (Supplementary Fig. 4B).
We focused on the genes shared by the (−) Light / (−) Dark and (+) Dark / (−) Dark comparisons, which we considered the core genes necessary for sporulation, we identified 31 upregulated and 19 downregulated genes (Fig. 4D). Among those DEG (Fig. 4F), four genes encoded proteins involved in regulating sporulation in fungi: cyclin1, wc-2, velB, and crgA. Their encoded proteins were similar to cyclins Pcl1p and Pcl2p, a White-collar 2 component of a blue light photoreceptor, a regulatory protein VelB, and a RING-finger ubiquitin ligase, respectively. All these genes were significantly upregulated under growth conditions that promoted sporulation, i.e., in the presence of light or endosymbionts, suggesting their importance in this process also in this species.
Endosymbiont mediates fungal stress resistance
To determine whether endobacteria provides additional advantages beyond sporulation and sexual reproduction that allow the host fungus to outcompete others in its natural niche, we tested the responses of cured strains under various stress conditions. Under osmotic stress (sorbitol, NaCl, and KCl), cured strains displayed significantly reduced growth compared with their corresponding non-cured counterparts (P ≤ .032) (Fig. 5A), suggesting that endosymbionts regulate cellular mechanisms that enhance osmotic stress tolerance. Similarly, ATCC 52814 (−) strain, but not ATCC 52813 (−), exhibited increased sensitivity to plasma membrane stressor SDS and oxidative stress by H2O2 (Fig. 5B). In contrast, exposure to cell wall stressors that interact with chitin, such as CFW and CR, revealed a trend toward increased resistance in cured strains. Accordingly, ATCC 52813 (−) showed significantly lower radial growth than ATCC 52813 (+) under CFW exposure (P = .0247), whereas ATCC 52814 (−) displayed significantly lower radial growth than ATCC 52814 (+) under CR exposure (P < .001) (Fig. 5B). These results suggest that endobacteria modulate fungal responses to membrane and cell wall stress in a strain- and stress-specific manner, likely to reflect underlying physiological and genetic differences in stress adaptation.
Figure 5.
Impact of the endosymbiont on the fungal cell wall and stress tolerance R. microsporus. (A) Mycelial growth of R. microsporus under osmotic stress. Sporangiospores were seeded and exposed to osmotic stress, and growth rates were measured after incubation at 30°C for 2 days in the dark. (B) Mycelial growth under plasma membrane and cell wall stress. Sporangiospores were subjected to different stress conditions under the same incubation conditions. (C) Quantification of ergosterol content, expressed as a percentage of mycelial dry weight, under 12-h light/dark incubation cycles. (D) Measurement of melanin content, determined by absorbance at 405 nm, under 12-h light/dark incubation cycles. (E) Cell wall thickness analysis using TEM after 7 days on PCA medium. Bar plots represent the mean ± standard deviation of at least three replicates. Statistical significance is indicated as “*” (light vs. dark) and “#” (non-cured vs. cured) and determined using 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test: (*) P ≤ .05; (**) P ≤ .001; (***) P ≤ .0001. Student’s t-test was used in (D & E) (*) P ≤ .05; (**) P ≤ .001; (***) P ≤ .0001.
To understand the basis of these altered responses, we analyzed ergosterol content, melanin content, and cell wall structure. Cured strains displayed a significant reduction in ergosterol content (P < .0006) compared to their non-cured counterparts, whereas no significant changes were detected in melanin content (Fig. 5C and D), suggesting that decreased ergosterol levels could contribute to their increased sensitivity to membrane stress. Light exposure increased ergosterol and melanin content in all strains, although no significant differences were detected between them (Supplementary Fig. 5A and B). TEM analysis revealed that the sporangiospore wall of the ATCC 52814 (−) strain was significantly thinner than that of the non-cured strain, whereas its hyphal wall was significantly thicker (Fig. 5E, Supplementary Fig. 5C), confirming the presence of structural changes in the cell wall associated with the presence of the endosymbiont.
Despite physiological differences, all strains exhibited similar susceptibility to antifungal drugs targeting ergosterol, including amphotericin B and azoles (voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole), showing at most a one-fold change in MIC values between cured, non-cured, and control strains. Even when the spore concentration was reduced to increase sensitivity in MIC detection, no significant changes in antifungal susceptibility were observed (Table S2), suggesting that the reduced ergosterol content observed in cured strains did not markedly increase resistance to ergosterol-targeting drugs. This virulence difference is not due to spore size among ATCC 11559, ATCC 52814 (−), and ATCC 52814 (−).
Endosymbionts modulate virulence in a murine model
The plasma membrane and cell wall are critical determinants of pathogenicity, influencing interactions with host immune defenses, tissue adhesion, and stress tolerance [72, 73]. Therefore, the altered plasma membrane composition and cell wall structure observed in cured strains could impact their ability to cause infection in mammals, as previously reported for Mucorales [24] and other fungal pathogens [73]. Moreover, Mycetohabitans isolates (formerly Burkholderia) are known to produce a diverse family of rhixozin congeners, including numerous structural variants with potential antimitotic activity [70], providing a plausible basis for endobacteria-associated virulence. In our mouse model, the ATCC 52814 (−) exhibited significantly reduced virulence compared to the non-cured counterpart strain (P < .007) at 7 days post-infection (Fig. 6A), indicating that the endosymbiont contributes substantially to virulence in mammals. Importantly, this virulence difference is not due to spore size among ATCC 11559, ATCC 52814 (−), and ATCC 52814 (−), with mean ± standard deviation values of 4.57 ± 0.31 μm, 4.41 ± 0.25 μm, and 4.56 ± 0.19 μm, respectively. Although all strains used in the murine model are from environmental origin, they display clear virulence in immunosuppressed mice, consistent with the fact that mucormycosis is mostly acquired from environmental exposure rather than through person-to-person or classical nosocomial transmission.
Figure 6.

Impact of endosymbiosis on fungal virulence. (A) Survival rates of mice (10 per group) immunosuppressed with cyclophosphamide and infected with cured and non-cured strains of R. Microsporus. Strains ATCC 11559 and UM1 were used as the virulent and avirulent controls, respectively. Statistical significance in survival assay was analyzed by a Mantel–Cox test and indicated by P values. P ≤ .05 (*), ≤ .001 (**) and P ≤ .0001 (***). (B) Intracellular survival of R. microsporus strains ATCC 11559, ATCC 52813(+), ATCC 52814(+), ATCC 52813(−), and ATCC 52814(−) in J774A.1 macrophages. Intracellular spore viability was determined by quantifying the number of CFUs after 4 h of incubation. Data were normalized to the initial inoculum of spores and represented as the mean ± standard deviation of two independent experiments. Statistically significant differences between groups are indicated by (“*” for resting spores or “#” for swollen (pre-germinating) spores) comparing strain with and without endosymbiont using one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey’s test. (*/#) P ≤ .05; (**/##) P ≤ .001; (***/###) P ≤ .0001.
The observed reduction in virulence is likely linked to the increased sensitivity of cured strains to stressors such as SDS and H2O2, which could result in lower resistance to macrophage phagocytosis, which plays a crucial role in host defense during Mucorales infections [74, 75]. Consistently, in vitro macrophage assays showed that macrophages were less efficient at clearing and killing both resting and swollen sporangiospores from cured strains (Fig. 6B). The most pronounced differences were observed in ATCC 52814 (−), which exhibited 51% lower clearance of resting spores and 26% lower clearance of swollen spores compared with the non-cured strain (P < .0001) (Fig. 6B).
Cured strains exhibited higher lipase secretion compared to non-cured strains or axenic cultures of the endosymbionts (Fig. 7). Given that lipase is a known fungal virulence factor [76–78], these results suggest that the reduced virulence of cured strains is not attributable to decreased lipase production or impaired macrophage interaction. Rather, it likely results from endobacteria-dependent physiological alterations, including changes in membrane composition and delayed spore germination.
Figure 7.

Qualitative extracellular lipase production with Tween-20 and phenol red as pH indicator. The sporangiospores or the endobacteria were inoculated at the center of plate and incubated at 30°C for 72 h. the bacterial strains of M. endofungorum used in this study were HKI 0402/B4/B13 and HKI 0403/B7/B14, which were isolated from R. microsporus strains ATCC 52813 and ATCC 52814, respectively. Plate without fungi inoculation was used as a negative control (pH = 6). Yellow color surrounding the colonies, resulting from pH reduction due to substrate hydrolysis, indicates lipase activity. Yellow color: Indicates medium acidification (pH < 7); orange color: pH ≈ 7; dark red color: Medium basification (pH >8).
Discussion
Asexual reproduction in environmental isolates of R. microsporus that host endobacteria was previously thought to be possible only in the presence of endobacteria [10, 11, 50]. However, in this study, we demonstrate that light can stimulate sporangia development and viable sporangiospores in R. microsporus after elimination of endobacteria. This finding indicates that light is an important external factor promoting sporulation in these strains, although its effect remains weaker than that exerted of endobacteria. In addition, it suggests that genes involved in sporulation are likely regulated by both light and the presence of endobacteria. Using a transcriptomic approach, we identified 50 DEGs in response to light and the endosymbiont. Notably, the list of 31 upregulated genes includes cyclin1, wc-2, velB, and crgA, all of which regulate sexual and asexual development in fungi [33, 38]. Our findings suggest that these genes are key regulatory elements of asexual sporulation in R. microsporus and are likely targets of the signal transduction pathways activated by each stimulus. Given that light-responsive pathways are ancestral in fungi, it is plausible that light originally served as a primary cue regulating sporulation and that endosymbionts may have subsequently evolved to hijack these preexisting light-regulated networks to modulate host sporulation.
VelB is a key component of the Velvet complex, a regulatory system that coordinates fungal development and secondary metabolism in ascomycetes [32, 79, 80]. In darkness, VelB interacts with VeA or VosA to form a nuclear complex that repress conidiation [79–82]. However, exposure to light enhances velB expression, promoting VelB-VelB dimerization and consequently activating sporulation [80–82]. The presence of several putative vosA orthologs in the R. microsporus genome and the upregulation of velB by both light and endosymbionts suggest that these genes are likely targets of the signaling pathway trigged by each stimulus to regulate asexual sporulation. Similarly, WC-2 forms together with WC-1 the WCC, a blue light photoreceptor that regulates sporulation in ascomycetes and Mucorales [35, 37, 38, 83]. In Mucor circinelloides, light activates the WCC via WC-1 homologs, triggering sporulation, aerial mycelian development, and carotenogenesis. Simultaneously, the RING-finger ubiquitin ligase CrgA represses this pathway in the dark by ubiquitylating the WC-1 homologs (Mcwc-1b). The inactivation of CrgA under illumination thus triggers WCC activity and facilitates developmental gene expression [36, 37]. The gene crgA also activates aerial mycelial development in R. microsporus non-host strains, but its role in regulating sporulation is not conserved [67]. However, this does not preclude its involvement in sporulation in host strains, as non-host strains have evolved to sporulate independently of endobacteria, potentially leading to divergence in crgA function between host and non-host strains.
In addition to regulatory genes, cyclin1 was also upregulated in response to light and endosymbionts. This gene encodes a protein similar to cyclins Pcl1p and Pcl2p, which are associated with the Pho85 kinase complex, i.e. implicated not only in cell cycle regulation [84, 85] but also in sporulation [84, 86]. Overall, the functions of these four genes in other fungi strongly support their role in sporulation in R. microsporus host strains. However, conclusive proof of their involvement in sporulation, as well as their interactions, will require the development of genetic modification techniques for host strains.
According to the mutualism theory [87], the presence of the Mycetohabitans endosymbionts can induce extensive physiological changes in their fungal hosts, extending beyond effects on reproduction [4, 6]. Consistent with previous studies [11, 29], we found that removal of the endobacteria significantly reduced radial growth when cultures are initiated with spores and delayed spore germination. Furthermore, the elimination of the endosymbiont reduced resistance to osmotic and oxidative stress, possibly due to alterations in cell wall structure and decreased ergosterol content in the cured strains, reflecting a broader reprogramming of lipid metabolism in the absence of endosymbiont. Endobacteria are known to modulate glycerol and fatty acid pathways, which contribute to membrane integrity and stress responses via the HOG pathway [71]. Their absence may therefore disrupt these pathways, diminishing ergosterol synthesis, impairing membrane fluidity, and altering signaling. Loss of endobacterial chitinolytic activity may also trigger compensatory remodeling of the fungal cell wall and membrane [16]. Notably, this metabolic reprogramming coincides with the observed increase in lipase production in cured strains, suggesting that the fungus adjusts lipid processing and secretion pathways in response to the absence of endobacteria. These findings are consistent with previous reports in Rhizopus [52, 71] and in related Mortierellomycota and Glomeromycota lineages [88–90], where endobacteria influence both cell wall and lipid metabolism, highlighting the evolutionary and ecological significance of these symbiotic interactions. In this context, it is important to note that Carter et al. [91] identified a TAL-like effector produced by Mycetohabitans that contributes to resistance to the membrane stressor SDS in R. microsporus ATCC 52813. In contrast, under our experimental conditions, the cured ATCC 52813 strain did not exhibit increased sensitivity to SDS, whereas cured ATCC 52814 strain showed reduction in SDS tolerance. This apparent discrepancy may reflect strain-specific interactions between particular Mycetohabitans lineages and their fungal hosts, differences in effector repertoires. Alternatively, methodological and growth conditions differences between our study and that of Carter et al. may also contribute to the distinct SDS phenotypes reported.
Previous studies have reported decreased sensitivity to amphotericin B in cured spores of R. microsporus containing Ralstonia pickettii [52]. However, the cured strains generated in this work show sensitivity to antifungal agents targeting ergosterol comparable to that of non-cured counterparts, despite their lower ergosterol content. Other factors besides cell wall or membrane composition have been identified as conferring antifungal resistance [92, 93]. Discrepancies with our observations may be attributed to methodological differences, as our study employed the standardized CLSI broth microdilution method, or to differences in the fungus-bacteria system. Despite the documented presence of endosymbionts in some clinical isolates of R. microsporus or other Mucorales [17, 18], their contribution to animal pathogenesis remains a largely unexplored yet exciting topic. Recent studies have shown macrophage-mediated killing resistance in R. microsporus harboring endobacteria and higher virulence in zebrafish [52]. However, no correlation has been established in humans or mice models, and the involvement of endosymbionts in fungal disease has not yet been demonstrated [94]. In our study, the cured strains exhibit reduced virulence in a mouse model, consistent with previous results in zebrafish and mice infected with spores pretreated with ciprofloxacin before infection [52]. The reduced virulence of the cured strains may be attributed to delayed germination and increased susceptibility to cell membrane stressors. High germination rates have been correlated with enhanced virulence in a pulmonary mucormycosis model of neutropenic rabbits infected with different Mucorales species [95], whereas delayed germination has been associated with attenuated virulence of M. lusitanicus in both G. mellonella and murine infection models [96, 97]. Similarly, in M. lusitanicus, increased sensitivity to SDS has been associated with reduced virulence [27]. Furthermore, the reduced virulence of the cured strains is not linked to lower resistance of resting or swollen (pre-germinating) sporangiospores to macrophage-mediated phagocytosis, the primary host defense mechanism against mucormycosis [74, 75, 98]. On the contrary, our in vitro co-culture experiments showed that the absence of the endosymbionts conferred resistance to macrophage-mediated killing. These observations contrast with previous reports of R. microsporus strains harboring R. pickettii [52], which exhibited higher resistance to macrophages, suggesting that distinct endobacteria may differentially modulate host-pathogen interactions. The increased resistance of cured sporangiospores to phagocytosis-mediated killing may be linked to their reduced ergosterol content, as elevated ergosterol levels can potentiate macrophage-mediated pyroptosis [99–101]. Alternatively, the increased lipase production, observed in the cured strains, may facilitate intracellular adaptation within macrophages without necessarily enhancing systemic virulence in animal models. Furthermore, cured strains displayed lower expression of wc-2 and velB compared to strains harboring endobacteria, and both WCC and VelB have been implicated in the virulence of several filamentous fungi, including Mucorales [102–105]. In addition to these physiological alterations, the increased virulence of strains harboring endobacteria may also be partly explained by the production of rhizoxin congeners by Mycetohabitans, which can disrupt host cell microtubule dynamics and contribute to tissue damage during infection [70]. Although the contribution of rhizoxins to mammalian pathogenesis has not been directly demonstrated, their cytotoxic properties provide a plausible basis for the enhanced virulence in endosymbiont-containing strains. Our results, although obtained from environmental isolates that display pathogenic ability in our immunosuppressed mouse model, highlight the need to investigate clinical strains to elucidate potential mechanisms of endobacteria-associated pathogenesis. Such mechanisms remain speculative as both in vitro and in vivo studies in clinical isolates are still lacking to reach a robust conclusion.
Overall, this study reveals the complex interplay between light, endosymbionts, and gene regulation in R. microsporus, providing new insights into the mechanisms driving sporulation and demonstrating the influence of endosymbionts on fungal fitness and virulence, with potential implications for understanding pathogenicity in Mucorales.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The authors sincerely thank Teresa E. Pawlowska (Cornell University, NY) for kindly providing the fungal strains. They extend our gratitude to Alberto M. Stchigel and Josepa Gené Díaz (Rovira i Virgili University) for their expertise in developing different sporulation strategies. They also thank Girona Tell Josefa (Rovira i Virgili University) for their assistance with cell culture and the Scientific and Technical Resources Service (Rovira i Virgili University, Spain) for their technical assistance in electron microscopy. Youssef Ahmiane is grateful to Rovira i Virgili University and Diputació de Tarragona for a Martí-Franqués doctoral grant (2019PMF-PIPF-103).
Contributor Information
Youssef Ahmiane, Unitat de Microbiologia, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43003 Reus, Tarragona, Spain.
Carlos Lax, Departamento de Genética y Microbiología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Sonia Béjar-González, Unitat de Microbiologia, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43003 Reus, Tarragona, Spain.
Francisco Esteban Nicolás, Departamento de Genética y Microbiología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Laura Camuña-Pardo, Unitat de Microbiologia, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43003 Reus, Tarragona, Spain.
Maria José Figueras, Unitat de Microbiologia, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43003 Reus, Tarragona, Spain; University Research Institute for Sustainability, Climate Change and Energy Transition (IU-RESCAT), 43480 Vila-seca, Tarragona, Spain.
Ana Fernández-Bravo, Unitat de Microbiologia, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43003 Reus, Tarragona, Spain; University Research Institute for Sustainability, Climate Change and Energy Transition (IU-RESCAT), 43480 Vila-seca, Tarragona, Spain.
Victoriano Garre, Departamento de Genética y Microbiología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Javier Capilla, Unitat de Microbiologia, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43003 Reus, Tarragona, Spain; University Research Institute for Sustainability, Climate Change and Energy Transition (IU-RESCAT), 43480 Vila-seca, Tarragona, Spain.
Marta Sanchis, Unitat de Microbiologia, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43003 Reus, Tarragona, Spain; University Research Institute for Sustainability, Climate Change and Energy Transition (IU-RESCAT), 43480 Vila-seca, Tarragona, Spain; Serra Húnter Fellow, Unitat de Microbiologia i Microbiologia Ambiental, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43003 Reus, Tarragona, Spain.
Author contributions
Y.A. together with J.C. and M.S. conceived the study and designed the experiments. Y.A. participated and performed all the experiments and analyzed the data. C.L. designed experiments and conducted the transcriptomic analyses and generated the figures visualizing these results. S.B.G and L.C.P participated in phenotype assays. F.E.N. and C.L. conducted in vivo infection assay. M.J.F.S conducted microscopy assays. M.J.F.S., J.C, F.E.N. and V.G. secured funding. A. F-B. participated in macrophage assays. Y.A. and C.L. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Y.A., C.L, F.E.N., V.G. J.C. and M.S. reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding
This study was in part supported by the grants PID2021-128068NB-I00, PID2021-124674NB-I00, and PID2024-160088NB-I00 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF/EU.
Data availability
Raw data files generated by this work are deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository and are publicly available through the project accession number GSE289616. The accession numbers of each assay condition used in this study are as follows: GSM8795093, GSM8795094, GSM8795095 (cured strain dark-cultured); GSM87950956, GSM8795097, GSM8795098 (cured strain light-cultured); GSM8795099, GSM8795100, GSM8795101 (host strain dark-cultured); and GSM8795102, GSM8795103, GSM8795104 (host strain light-cultured).
References
- 1. Wernegreen JJ. In it for the long haul: evolutionary consequences of persistent endosymbiosis. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2017;47:83–90. 10.1016/j.gde.2017.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Douglas AE. How multi-partner endosymbioses function. Nat Rev Microbiol 2016;14:731–43. 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Genre A, Lanfranco L, Perotto S et al. Unique and common traits in mycorrhizal symbioses. Nat Rev Microbiol 2020;18:649–60. 10.1038/s41579-020-0402-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Richter I, Büttner H, Hertweck C. Endofungal bacteria as hidden facilitators of biotic interactions. ISME J 2025;19:wraf128. 10.1093/ismejo/wraf128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Duan S, Feng G, Limpens E et al. Cross-kingdom nutrient exchange in the plant–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus–bacterium continuum. Nat Rev Microbiol 2024;22:773–90. 10.1038/s41579-024-01073-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Pawlowska TE. Symbioses between fungi and bacteria: from mechanisms to impacts on biodiversity. Curr Opin Microbiol 2024;80:102496. 10.1016/j.mib.2024.102496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Steffan BN, Venkatesh N, Keller NP. Let’s get physical: bacterial-fungal interactions and their consequences in agriculture and health. J Fungi 2020;6:243. 10.3390/jof6040243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Pawlowska TE, Gaspar ML, Lastovetsky OA et al. Biology of fungi and their bacterial endosymbionts. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2018;56:289–309. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-045914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lastovetsky OA, Caruso T, Brennan FP et al. Spores of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi host surprisingly diverse communities of endobacteria. New Phytol 2024;242:1785–97. 10.1111/nph.19605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Partida-Martinez LP, Monajembashi S, Greulich KO et al. Endosymbiont-dependent host reproduction maintains bacterial-fungal mutualism. Curr Biol 2007;17:773–7. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Mondo SJ, Lastovetsky OA, Gaspar ML et al. Bacterial endosymbionts influence host sexuality and reveal reproductive genes of early divergent fungi. Nat Commun 2017;8:1843. 10.1038/s41467-017-02052-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Partida-Martinez LP, Hertweck C. A gene cluster encoding rhizoxin biosynthesis in ‘Burkholderia rhizoxina’, the bacterial endosymbiont of the fungus Rhizopus microsporus. Chembiochem 2007;8:41–5. 10.1002/cbic.200600393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Sato Z, Noda T, Matsuda I et al. Studies on rhizoxin, a phytotoxin produced by Rhizopus chinensis causing rice seedling blight. Ann Phytopathol Soc Jpn 1983;49:128. [Google Scholar]
- 14. Scherlach K, Busch B, Lackner G et al. Symbiotic cooperation in the biosynthesis of a Phytotoxin. Angew Chem Int Engl 2012;51:9615–8. 10.1002/anie.201204540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Richter I, Radosa S, Cseresnyés Z et al. Toxin-producing endosymbionts shield pathogenic fungus against micropredators. MBio 2022;13:e0144022. 10.1128/mbio.01440-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Lastovetsky OA, Krasnovsky LD, Qin X et al. Molecular dialogues between early divergent fungi and bacteria in an antagonism versus a mutualism. MBio 2020;11:e02088–20. 10.1128/mBio.02088-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Tansarli GS, Eschbacher J, Schroeder LK et al. Mycetohabitans rhizoxinica in patients with Rhinocerebral Mucormycosis due to Rhizopus microsporus. Mycopathologia 2023;188:151–3. 10.1007/s11046-023-00707-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Yang S, Anikst V, Adamson PC. Endofungal Mycetohabitans rhizoxinica Bacteremia associated with Rhizopus microsporus respiratory tract infection. Emerg Infect Dis 2022;28:2091–5. 10.3201/eid2810.220507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Orbea M, Fortini M, Amerson-Brown MH et al. Mycetohabitans rhizoxinica bacteremia in the setting of invasive fungal disease in an immunocompromised patient. ASM Case Rep 2025;1:e00014–24. 10.1128/asmcr.00014-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Skiada A, Pagano L, Groll A et al. Zygomycosis in Europe: analysis of 230 cases accrued by the registry of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) working group on Zygomycosis between 2005 and 2007. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011;17:1859–67. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03456.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Gupta I, Baranwal P, Singh G et al. Mucormycosis, past and present: a comprehensive review. Future Microbiol 2023;18:217–34. 10.2217/fmb-2022-0141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hoenigl M, Seidel D, Carvalho A et al. The emergence of COVID-19 associated mucormycosis: a review of cases from 18 countries. Lancet Microbe 2022;3:e543–52. 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00237-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Gebremariam T, Liu M, Luo G et al. CotH3 mediates fungal invasion of host cells during mucormycosis. J Clin Invest 2014;124:237–50. 10.1172/JCI71349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Szebenyi C, Gu Y, Gebremariam T et al. cotH genes are necessary for Normal spore formation and virulence in Mucor lusitanicus. MBio 2023;14:e0338622. 10.1128/mbio.03386-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Soliman SSM, Baldin C, Gu Y et al. Mucoricin is a ricin-like toxin that is critical for the pathogenesis of mucormycosis. Nat Microbiol 2021;6:313–26. 10.1038/s41564-020-00837-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Lax C, Nicolás FE, Navarro E et al. Molecular mechanisms that govern infection and antifungal resistance in Mucorales. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2024;88:e0018822. 10.1128/mmbr.00188-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. López-Fernández L, Sanchis M, Navarro-Rodríguez P et al. Understanding Mucor circinelloides pathogenesis by comparative genomics and phenotypical studies. Virulence 2018;9:707–20. 10.1080/21505594.2018.1435249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Espino-Vázquez AN, Bermúdez-Barrientos JR, Cabrera-Rangel JF et al. Narnaviruses: novel players in fungal–bacterial symbioses. ISME J 2020;14:1743–54. 10.1038/s41396-020-0638-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Cabrera-Rangel JF, Mendoza-Servín JV, Córdova-López G et al. Symbiotic and toxinogenic Rhizopus spp. isolated from soils of different papaya producing regions in Mexico. Front Fungal Biol 2022;3:893700. 10.3389/ffunb.2022.893700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Huang M, Hull CM. Sporulation: how to survive on planet earth (and beyond). Curr Genet 2017;63:831–8. 10.1007/s00294-017-0694-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Su YY, Qi YL, Cai L. Induction of sporulation in plant pathogenic fungi. Mycology 2012;3:195–200. 10.1080/21501203.2012.719042 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Son YE, Park HS. Unveiling the functions of the VosA-VelB target gene vidD in aspergillus nidulans. Mycobiology 2021;49:258–66. 10.1080/12298093.2021.1926122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Park HS, Yu JH. Genetic control of asexual sporulation in filamentous fungi. Curr Opin Microbiol 2012;15:669–77. 10.1016/j.mib.2012.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. He Q, Liu Y. Molecular mechanism of light responses in Neurospora: from light-induced transcription to photoadaptation. Genes Dev 2005;19:2888–99. 10.1101/gad.1369605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Liu Y, He Q, Cheng P. Photoreception in Neurospora: a tale of two white collar proteins. Cell Mol Life Sci 2003;60:2131–8. 10.1007/s00018-003-3109-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Nicolás FE, Calo S, Murcia-Flores L et al. A RING-finger photocarotenogenic repressor involved in asexual sporulation in Mucor circinelloides. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2008;280:81–8. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.01044.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Navarro E, Peñaranda A, Hansberg W et al. A white collar 1-like protein mediates opposite regulatory functions in Mucor circinelloides. Fungal Genet Biol 2013;52:42–52. 10.1016/j.fgb.2012.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Corrochano LM, Garre V. Photobiology in the Zygomycota: multiple photoreceptor genes for complex responses to light. Fungal Genet Biol 2010;47:893–9. 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Lax C, Mondo SJ, Osorio-Concepción M et al. Symmetric and asymmetric DNA N6-adenine methylation regulates different biological responses in Mucorales. Nat Commun 2024;15:6066. 10.1038/s41467-024-50365-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Yu Z, Fischer R. Light sensing and responses in fungi. Nat Rev Microbiol 2019;17:25–36. 10.1038/s41579-018-0109-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Nagahashi G, Douds DD. Synergism between blue light and root exudate compounds and evidence for a second messenger in the hyphal branching response of Gigaspora gigantea. Mycologia 2004;96:948–54. 10.1080/15572536.2005.11832894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Richter I, Uzum Z, Wein P et al. Transcription activator-like effectors from endosymbiotic bacteria control the reproduction of their fungal host. MBio 2023;14:e0182423. 10.1128/mbio.01824-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Richter I, Hasan M, Kramer JW et al. Deazaflavin metabolite produced by endosymbiotic bacteria controls fungal host reproduction. ISME J 2024;18:wrae074. 10.1093/ismejo/wrae074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Niehs SP, Scherlach K, Dose B et al. A highly conserved gene locus in endofungal bacteria codes for the biosynthesis of symbiosis-specific cyclopeptides. PNAS Nexus 2022;1:pgac152. 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Lackner G, Moebius N, Hertweck C. Endofungal bacterium controls its host by an hrp type III secretion system. ISME J 2011;5:252–61. 10.1038/ismej.2010.126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Richter I, Wein P, Uzum Z et al. Transcription activator-like effector protects bacterial endosymbionts from entrapment within fungal hyphae. Curr Biol 2023;33:2646–2656.e4. 10.1016/j.cub.2023.05.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Kameoka H, Tsutsui I, Saito K et al. Stimulation of asymbiotic sporulation in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi by fatty acids. Nat Microbiol 2019;4:1654–60. 10.1038/s41564-019-0485-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Bianciotto V, Genre A, Jargeat P et al. Vertical transmission of endobacteria in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Gigaspora margarita through generation of vegetative spores. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004;70:3600–8. 10.1128/AEM.70.6.3600-3608.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Mondo SJ, Toomer KH, Morton JB et al. Evolutionary stability in a 400-million-year-old heritable facultative mutualism. Evolution 2012;66:2564–76. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01611.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Partida-Martinez LP, Hertweck C. Pathogenic fungus harbours endosymbiotic bacteria for toxin production. Nature 2005;437:884–8. 10.1038/nature03997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Liu XL, Zhao H, Wang YX et al. Detecting and characterizing new endofungal bacteria in new hosts: Pandoraea sputorum and Mycetohabitans endofungorum in Rhizopus arrhizus. Front Microbiol 2024;15:1346252. 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1346252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Itabangi H, Sephton-Clark PCS, Tamayo DP et al. A bacterial endosymbiont of the fungus Rhizopus microsporus drives phagocyte evasion and opportunistic virulence. Curr Biol 2022;32:1115–1130.e6. 10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 2012;9:671–5. 10.1038/nmeth.2089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Patiño-Medina JA, Maldonado-Herrera G, Pérez-Arques C et al. Control of morphology and virulence by ADP-ribosylation factors (Arf) in Mucor circinelloides. Curr Genet 2018;64:853–69. 10.1007/s00294-017-0798-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Gupta A, Chattoo BB. A novel gene MGA1 is required for appressorium formation in Magnaporthe grisea. Fungal Genet Biol 2007;44:1157–69. 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.02.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Arthington-Skaggs BA, Jradi H, Desai T et al. Quantitation of ergosterol content: novel method for determination of fluconazole susceptibility of Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:3332–7. 10.1128/JCM.37.10.3332-3337.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Glauert AM, Lewis PR. Biological Specimen Preparation for Transmission Electron Microscopy. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1998, 10.1515/9781400865024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) . Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility of filamentous fungi. 3rd ed. CLSI standard M38. Wayne, PA; 2017. p. 1–50. [Google Scholar]
- 59. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014;30:2114–20. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods 2015;12:357–60. 10.1038/nmeth.3317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. FeatureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 2014;30:923–30. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 2014;15:550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Ramírez F, Ryan DP, Grüning B et al. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44:W160–5. 10.1093/nar/gkw257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol 2011;29:24–6. 10.1038/nbt.1754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Wood DE, Salzberg SL. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol 2014;15:R46. 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Ondov BD, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. Interactive metagenomic visualization in a web browser. BMC Bioinformatics 2011;12:385. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Lax C, Navarro-Mendoza MI, Pérez-Arques C et al. Stable and reproducible homologous recombination enables CRISPR-based engineering in the fungus Rhizopus microsporus. Cell Rep Methods 2021;1:100124. 10.1016/j.crmeth.2021.100124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Yardeni T, Eckhaus M, Morris HD et al. Retro-orbital injections in mice. Lab Anim (NY) 2011;40:155–60. 10.1038/laban0511-155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Hankin L, Anagnostakis SL. The use of solid Media for Detection of enzyme production by fungi. Mycologia 1975;67:597–607. 10.1080/00275514.1975.12019782 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Scherlach K, Partida-Martinez LP, Danse HM et al. Antimitotic rhizoxin derivatives from a cultured bacterial endosymbiont of the rice pathogenic fungus Rhizopus microsporus. J Am Chem Soc 2006;128:11529–36. 10.1021/ja062953o [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Lastovetsky OA, Gaspar ML, Mondo SJ et al. Lipid metabolic changes in an early divergent fungus govern the establishment of a mutualistic symbiosis with endobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016;113:15102–7. 10.1073/pnas.1615148113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Gow NAR, Latge J-P, Munro CA. The fungal Cell Wall: structure, biosynthesis, and function. Microbiol Spectrum 2017;5:10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0035-2016. 10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0035-2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Hopke A, Brown AJP, Hall RA et al. Dynamic fungal cell wall architecture in stress adaptation and immune evasion. Trends Microbiol 2018;26:284–95. 10.1016/j.tim.2018.01.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Nicolás FE, Murcia L, Navarro E et al. Mucorales species and macrophages. J Fungi 2020;6:94. 10.3390/jof6020094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Ibrahim AS, Voelz K. The mucormycete–host interface. Curr Opin Microbiol 2017;40:40–5. 10.1016/j.mib.2017.10.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Park M, Do E, Jung WH. Lipolytic enzymes involved in the virulence of human pathogenic fungi. Mycobiology 2013;41:67–72. 10.5941/MYCO.2013.41.2.67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Voigt CA, Schäfer W, Salomon S. A secreted lipase of fusarium graminearum is a virulence factor required for infection of cereals. Plant J 2005;42:364–75. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02377.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Gácser A, Stehr F, Kröger C et al. Lipase 8 affects the pathogenesis of Candida albicans. Infect Immun 2007;75:4710–8. 10.1128/IAI.00372-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Park HS, Ni M, Jeong KC et al. The role, interaction and regulation of the velvet regulator VelB in aspergillus nidulans. PLoS One 2012;7:e45935. 10.1371/journal.pone.0045935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Bayram Ö, Krappmann S, Ni M et al. VelB/VeA/LaeA complex coordinates light signal with fungal development and secondary metabolism. Science 2008;320:1504–6. 10.1126/science.1155888 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Bayram ÖS, Bayram Ö, Valerius O et al. LaeA control of velvet family regulatory proteins for light-dependent development and fungal cell-type specificity. PLoS Genet 2010;6:e1001226. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Chang PK, Scharfenstein LL, Li P et al. Aspergillus flavus VelB acts distinctly from VeA in conidiation and may coordinate with FluG to modulate sclerotial production. Fungal Genet Biol 2013;58-59:71–9. 10.1016/j.fgb.2013.08.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Linden H, Macino G. White collar 2, a partner in blue-light signal transduction, controlling expression of light-regulated genes in Neurospora crassa. EMBO J 1997;16:98–109. 10.1093/emboj/16.1.98 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Lee TI, Rinaldi NJ, Robert F et al. Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 2002;298:799–804. 10.1126/science.1075090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. McBride HJ, Sil A, Measday V et al. The protein kinase Pho85 is required for asymmetric accumulation of the Ash1 protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol 2001;42:345–53. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02601.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Schier N, Liese R, Fischer R. A Pcl-like cyclin of aspergillus nidulans is transcriptionally activated by developmental regulators and is involved in sporulation. Mol Cell Biol 2001;21:4075–88. 10.1128/MCB.21.12.4075-4088.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Hale KRS, Valdovinos FS. Ecological theory of mutualism: robust patterns of stability and thresholds in two-species population models. Ecol Evol 2021;11:17651–71. 10.1002/ece3.8453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Venice F, Ghignone S, Salvioli di Fossalunga A et al. At the nexus of three kingdoms: the genome of the mycorrhizal fungus Gigaspora margarita provides insights into plant, endobacterial and fungal interactions. Environ Microbiol 2020;22:122–41. 10.1111/1462-2920.14827 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Venice F, Chialva M, Domingo G et al. Symbiotic responses of Lotus japonicus to two isogenic lines of a mycorrhizal fungus differing in the presence/absence of an endobacterium. Plant J 2021;108:1547–64. 10.1111/tpj.15578 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Uehling J, Gryganskyi A, Hameed K et al. Comparative genomics of Mortierella elongata and its bacterial endosymbiont Mycoavidus cysteinexigens. Environ Microbiol 2017;19:2964–83. 10.1111/1462-2920.13669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Carter ME, Carpenter SCD, Dubrow ZE et al. A TAL effector-like protein of an endofungal bacterium increases the stress tolerance and alters the transcriptome of the host. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2020;117:17122–9. 10.1073/pnas.2003857117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Ganesan P, Ganapathy D, Sekaran S et al. Molecular mechanisms of antifungal resistance in Mucormycosis. Biomed Res Int 2022;2022:6722245. 10.1155/2022/6722245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Lee Y, Robbins N, Cowen LE. Molecular mechanisms governing antifungal drug resistance. NPJ Antimicrob Resist 2023;1:5. 10.1038/s44259-023-00007-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Ibrahim AS, Gebremariam T, Liu M et al. Bacterial endosymbiosis is widely present among Zygomycetes but does not contribute to the pathogenesis of Mucormycosis. J Infect Dis 2008;198:1083–90. 10.1086/591461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Petraitis V, Petraitiene R, Antachopoulos C et al. Increased virulence of Cunninghamella bertholletiae in experimental pulmonary mucormycosis: correlation with circulating molecular biomarkers, sporangiospore germination and hyphal metabolism. Med Mycol 2013;51:72–82. 10.3109/13693786.2012.690107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Pérez-Arques C, Navarro-Mendoza MI, Murcia L et al. Mucor circinelloides thrives inside the phagosome through an Atf-mediated germination pathway. MBio 2019;10:e02765–18. 10.1128/mBio.02765-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Trieu TA, Navarro-Mendoza MI, Pérez-Arques C et al. RNAi-based functional genomics identifies new virulence determinants in Mucormycosis. PLoS Pathog 2017;13:e1006150. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Erwig LP, Gow NAR. Interactions of fungal pathogens with phagocytes. Nat Rev Microbiol 2016;14:163–76. 10.1038/nrmicro.2015.21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Wellington M, Koselny K, Sutterwala FS et al. Candida albicans triggers NLRP3-mediated Pyroptosis in macrophages. Eukaryot Cell 2014;13:329–40. 10.1128/EC.00336-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. O’Meara TR, Veri AO, Ketela T et al. Global analysis of fungal morphology exposes mechanisms of host cell escape. Nat Commun 2015;6:6741. 10.1038/ncomms7741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Koselny K, Mutlu N, Minard AY et al. A genome-wide screen of deletion mutants in the filamentous Saccharomyces cerevisiae background identifies ergosterol as a direct trigger of macrophage pyroptosis. MBio 2018;9:e01204–18. 10.1128/mBio.01204-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Pérez-Arques C, Navarro-Mendoza MI, Murcia L et al. A Mucoralean white Collar-1 photoreceptor controls virulence by regulating an intricate gene network during host interactions. Microorganisms 2021;9:459. 10.3390/microorganisms9020459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. López-Berges MS, Hera C, Sulyok M et al. The velvet complex governs mycotoxin production and virulence of fusarium oxysporum on plant and mammalian hosts. Mol Microbiol 2013;87:49–65. 10.1111/mmi.12082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Idnurm A, Heitman J. Light controls growth and development via a conserved pathway in the fungal kingdom. PLoS Biol 2005;3:e95. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Ruiz-Roldán MC, Garre V, Guarro J et al. Role of the white collar 1 photoreceptor in carotenogenesis, UV resistance, hydrophobicity, and virulence of fusarium oxysporum. Eukaryot Cell 2008;7:1227–30. 10.1128/EC.00072-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Raw data files generated by this work are deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository and are publicly available through the project accession number GSE289616. The accession numbers of each assay condition used in this study are as follows: GSM8795093, GSM8795094, GSM8795095 (cured strain dark-cultured); GSM87950956, GSM8795097, GSM8795098 (cured strain light-cultured); GSM8795099, GSM8795100, GSM8795101 (host strain dark-cultured); and GSM8795102, GSM8795103, GSM8795104 (host strain light-cultured).




