Abstract
Introduction:
Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment modality for individuals with morbid obesity, providing significant and durable weight loss and comorbidity resolution. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonists have shown promise as weight loss drugs, in addition to their use in the treatment of metabolic disorders. While multimodal weight management is the standard of care for individuals with morbid obesity, the benefit of antecedent GLP-1 therapy prior to bariatric surgery has not been well-studied. The objective of this study is to conduct a clinical trial testing the hypothesis that preoperative treatment with a dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist enhances preoperative weight loss and decreases tissue inflammation, resulting in improved postoperative outcomes.
Materials and methods:
We designed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing preoperative treatment with tirzepatide versus standard medical care prior to minimally invasive bariatric surgery with a target enrollment of 50 patients randomized 1:1. For 3 mo preoperatively, the control arm will receive standard care in the form of dietary and lifestyle modification recommendations, whereas the treatment arm will receive weekly tirzepatide, in addition to standard care. Blood will be collected at enrollment through 12-mo postoperatively and analyzed for inflammatory and metabolic markers. Tissues (adipose, stomach, and liver) will be collected intraoperatively for transcriptome profiling and histological assessment.
Results:
This is an ongoing trial with no reportable results.
Conclusion:
Completion of this pilot RCT will provide data to support initiation of a multi-center RCT to determine therapeutic efficacy, and mechanisms of action, by which patients could benefit from preoperative treatment with tirzepatide.
Keywords: Bariatric surgery, GLP-1, Obesity, Tirzepatide, Weight loss
Introduction
Obesity is defined by the World Health Organization as a chronic disease characterized by excessive fat deposits that can negatively affect health.1 Currently, 43% of adults world-wide are overweight and 16% have obesity, more than doubling since 1990.1 In the United States, the prevalence of obesity among adults is 41.9%.2 Kentucky ranks second highest in the United States for obesity prevalence and has consistently ranked in the top 10 for the past 8 y.3
Chronic weight management strategies have traditionally included lifestyle changes combined with either pharmaco-therapy or metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). Common effective MBS procedures include gastric bypass (GBP), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and biliopancreatic diversion. In head-to-head comparisons, randomized controlled trial (RCT) data have shown the superiority of MBS over lifestyle interventions or pharmacotherapy for weight loss, metabolic outcomes, and treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.4–14 Observational studies have likewise shown that a modest degree of weight loss, achieved with diet/lifestyle changes before MBS may have clinically significant benefits including greater post-operative weight loss,15,16 and reduced perioperative complication and mortality rates.17 On the other hand, some studies report no correlation between preoperative weight loss and outcomes after bariatric surgery.18,19 Many comprehensive and multidisciplinary bariatric surgery programs consider preoperative weight loss a pre-requisite for surgery; however, it has not become standardized practice due to variability in patient responses.
Recently glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) as well as dual GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) RAs have revolutionized weight management strategies.20–22 The SURMOUNT-1 study, a phase three double blind RCT involving over 2500 patients, examined the effects of three different doses of dual GLP-1/GIP therapeutic agent, tirzepatide (Mounjaro).23 Average weight reduction, compared to placebo, ranged from 16 to 22% total body weight after 72 wk of treatment. The results of this trial showed greater mean weight loss than the 15% weight reduction seen with semaglutide (Ozempic) over 68 wk in the STEP-1 study.24 One of the major concerns with medical weight management revolves around the durability of weight loss. There is limited but strong evidence from at least three RCTs showing significant weight regain after initial loss, following discontinuation of GLP-1 RA therapy.14,25,26 The STEP-1 extension study showed that participants regained two-thirds of their weight lost within 1 y of stopping a 68-wk treatment regimen with semaglutide.25 Combining GLP-1/GIP pharmacotherapy with MBS has potential to provide a benefit to patients, especially those with morbid obesity. However, prospective trials combining weight loss drugs and surgery are lacking. Existing studies are mostly retrospective in nature with no treatment standardization and a focus on weight loss alone.27,28 GLP and GIP are thought to act on multiple tissues and cells through their independent receptors with potential effects far beyond weight loss.29 To our knowledge, there are no studies that have prospectively evaluated the impact of preoperative treatment with dual GLP-1/GIP RA medication on tissue level inflammation or metabolic outcomes, in addition to weight loss, in patients undergoing MBS.
GLP-1 receptor signaling exerts broad anti-inflammatory actions across multiple organ systems, including adipose tissue, liver, kidney, intestine, vasculature, and the brain.30,31 GLP-1 receptor activation reduces proinflammatory cytokine production, shifts macrophages toward a more anti-inflammatory phenotype, and attenuates NF-κB—mediated inflammatory pathways. These anti-inflammatory effects complement the more well-known metabolic actions of GLP-1—based therapy and can occur independently. For example, a single dose of exenatide or semaglutide was found to reduce tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and interleukin 1-beta levels in rodent models of inflammation and in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells from treated patients.32–34 Further, a 2021 systematic review and meta-analysis of 40 RCTs, reported that therapy with GLP-1RAs compared to standard diabetes treatments or placebo was associated with significant reductions in serum C-reactive protein (CRP), TNFα and malondialdehyde, and a significant increase in adiponectin, providing clinical support for the anti-inflammatory role of GLP-1 RAs.35
We have initiated an RCT to test the effects of preoperative tirzepatide treatment on tissue-level inflammation and evaluate the association of these changes with postoperative improvements in weight loss, inflammation, and cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes after bariatric surgery. We hypothesize that participants on tirzepatide preoperatively will have a decrease in inflammatory markers and improved overall weight loss and metabolic outcomes after MBS compared to those not antecedently treated with the study drug. The outcome of this study could impact therapeutic guidelines for the multimodal treatment of obesity.
Study Design
We initiated an RCT at the University of Kentucky (UK) with plans to recruit 50 adult patients who have enrolled in the multidisciplinary MBS program at the UK HealthCare Weight Loss Surgery Clinic and are candidates to undergo laparoscopic or robotic SG, or gastric bypass surgery (either primary or conversion of SG to GBP for weight recurrence). Our enrollment goal is based mostly on feasibility, although a power analysis was performed by the study statistician (G. S. H.) using nQuery 9.3.1 (Statistical Solutions Ltd.; Cork, Ireland). Using a two-sided significance level of 0.05, we estimated that a sample size of 20 competing participants in each group would yield 80% power to detect between-group differences of at least 0.91 standard deviations in quantitative outcomes. Although this represents a relatively large effect size, the pilot nature of this RCT prioritizes feasibility in preparation for the initiation of a higher-powered multicenter RCT in the future. Five patients per group were added to account for potential withdrawals, differences in drug and procedure being tested, and the single-center nature of the study, arriving at 25 patients per treatment group for a total of 50 planned enrollments. Detailed Inclusion and Exclusion criteria are listed in Table 1. This ongoing trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06721507, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06721507 , date of registration: March 12, 2024). The proposed dates of enrollment are March 2025 through March 2027, or until full recruitment is achieved. All potential participants identified using approved recruitment methods will complete an informed consent process prior to enrollment in the study (UK Institutional Review Board protocol #97933).
Table 1 –
Study inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Inclusion criteria |
|
|
| Adults (age greater than or equal to 18 y) |
|
|
| Must be enrolled in the multidisciplinary metabolic and bariatric surgery program at the UKHC weight loss surgery clinic |
|
|
| BMI ≥40 kg/m2 with one or more obesity-related comorbidities |
|
|
| Demonstrated abstinence from any form of nicotine use, confirmed by serum nicotine and metabolite testing |
|
|
| Expressed preference and are deemed a suitable candidate for laparoscopic or robotic vertical sleeve gastrectomy, or gastric bypass |
|
|
| Enrollment in the ADORE bariatric tissue bank |
|
|
| Exclusion criteria |
|
|
| Any contraindication to the use of tirzepatide (per package insert) |
|
|
| 1 Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma. |
| 2 Patients with multiple endocrine neoplasm syndrome type 2. |
| 3 Hypersensitivity to tirzepatide. |
| 4 History of pancreatitis. |
| 5 Type 1 diabetes. |
| 6 Patients with active, untreated, or symptomatic cholelithiasis or jaundice. |
|
|
| Current use of a GLP-1 or GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist, or consistent use within past 90 d |
|
|
| Diagnosed autoimmune disease |
|
|
| Current use of immunosuppressive agents or use within the past 30 d |
|
|
| Moderate or severe substance use disorder according to DSM-5 criteria |
|
|
| Uncontrolled significant psychiatric disorder as assessed by specialized bariatric psychologist |
|
|
| Female participant who is pregnant, breast-feeding, or intends to become pregnant with in 1 y following surgery |
|
|
| Prisoners |
ADORE = Alliance for Diabetes Research; BMI = body mass index; DSM-5 = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition; GIP = glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide; GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide-1; UKHC = University of Kentucky HealthCare.
The study workflow is depicted in Figure. Participants will be randomized to receive standard of care (SOC) alone or SOC with preoperative tirzepatide treatment for 3 mo prior to surgery. The statistician (G. S. H.) will perform the randomization for each patient adaptively, using a Microsoft Excel macro-based scheme designed to prioritize the balance of age, body mass index, and diabetes in each group, while still retaining a sizable element of randomness for each patient’s assignment. The study team will not be blinded to assigned arm, given the lack of placebo control in this pilot trial. SOC consists of consultation with the multidisciplinary MBS team and surgeon, bariatric clinic nursing staff, registered dietician, and a certified behavioral health provider. Patients attend a group nutrition class where in-depth education and counseling regarding dietary and lifestyle modification is provided. Study subjects are then seen for monthly visits to assess progress and compliance with dietary and lifestyle modifications before surgery can be scheduled. Study subjects randomized to receive 3 mo of tirzepatide treatment will be seen in the UK HealthCare Endocrinology Clinic to undergo education and counseling regarding self-injection of the medication as well as side effect monitoring. Participants will self-administer weekly injections of tirzepatide subcutaneously and undergo monthly visits in the Endocrinology Clinic to assess for tolerance and monthly dose escalation per clinical guidelines and provider assessment. Monthly visits will be coordinated with the monthly MBS SOC clinic visits.
Fig.

— Study workflow: Collaborative study workflow between UKHC Weight Loss Surgery Clinic, UKHC Endocrine Clinic, ADORE Bariatric Tissue Bank, and basic science research labs at University of Kentucky College of Medicine.
For all enrolled participants, blood will be collected at enrollment (baseline), at the end of study drug treatment (~3months later for both arms), and during the postoperative period (1, 6, and 12 mo). Blood will be processed to obtain plasma, serum, and PMBCs which will be cryopreserved for future use. The surgical procedure will be minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robotic) performed by one of three surgeons, and sleeve size is calibrated around either a 40 or 56 French bougie based on individual surgeon’s established technique. Oversewing of the staple line and omentopexy is performed by two out of the three surgeons. We partnered with the Alliance for Diabetes and Obesity Research Bariatric Tissue Project (UK IRB #69767) to collect tissue samples intra-operatively. This biorepository functions as an important research resource for investigators focusing on diabetes and/or obesity by providing abdominal tissues collected intra-operatively including subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue, liver, and stomach which are harvested by the surgeon or collected from histopathological specimens. Tissues are collected as follows. A core needle liver biopsy is obtained using a soft core automatic biopsy gun under direct laparoscopic visualization followed by hemostasis using electrocautery, a wedge omental fat biopsy is obtained using advanced bipolar energy device, and a subcutaneous fat biopsy is obtained using electrocautery to excise a 1-2 cm wide and 3-5 mm thick disc of tissue from one of the larger trocar site incisions. These specimens are collected fresh from the operating room, processed to a size for storing in 2 mL cryovials, preserved on dry ice, and stored in an ultra-low temperature freezer at − 80°C. At the time of SG, a small portion of the excised partial gastrectomy specimen and, based on operative technique variations, occasionally a small specimen of gastric pouch or small intestine at the time of GBP are collected and sent to the clinical pathology lab. From there, a clinical pathologist will provide discarded specimens to the study team which are preserved in 10% formalin or frozen on dry ice. Collectively, these samples (blood and tissue) will be used to assess changes in inflammatory and metabolic health markers. Proposed blood tests are centered around inflammatory biomarkers or molecules which modulate inflammation, metabolism, and energy balance. CRP, interleukin-6, and TNFα are common inflammatory biomarkers which are positively associated with obesity and have been used to assess inflammation in prior studies for both GLP-1 therapy and bariatric surgery.35–42 Adiponectin and leptin are fat-derived hormones frequently used to assess metabolic health.40–44 The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is a hormonal system with multiple components whose alterations are linked to inflammation and energy balance.45–47 The effects of tirzepatide therapy on changes at the tissue level will be characterized by histological assessment of H&E-stained tissue sections and gene expression profiling using bulk RNA sequencing. The collective tissue-level and systemic inflammatory profiles will be analyzed for association with postoperative clinical and metabolic outcomes (Table 2). All lab analysis will be performed in blinded fashion with deidentified samples.
Table 2 –
Planned data points.
| Patient characteristics* | Standard of care blood tests† |
|---|---|
| Age | CBC w/differential |
| Sex | CMP |
| Ethnicity | Lipid profile |
| Height | Prealbumin |
| Weight | Hemoglobin A1c |
| Body mass index | TSH |
| Body composition (fat and muscle mass) | Free T4 |
| iPTH | |
| Blood pressure | |
| Comorbidities | |
| Blood tests and samples for research† | Tissues banked during surgery |
| PBMCs isolated from blood | Visceral adipose tissue |
| Insulin | Subcutaneous adipose tissue |
| CRP | Liver |
| IL-6 | Stomach |
| TNFα | |
| Leptin | |
| Adiponectin | |
| Calcitonin | |
| RAAS profile | |
| Postoperative data‡ | |
| 30-d postoperative | Comorbidity improvement |
| complications § | Blood pressure |
| Death | Hemoglobin A1c |
| Surgical site infection | Plasma triglycerides |
| Anastomotic/staple line leak | Need for T2D medications |
| Venous thromboembolism | |
| Anastomotic/staple line bleeding | |
| Emergency department visit |
CBC = complete blood count; CMP = comprehensive metabolic panel; CRP = C-reactive protein; IL-6 = interleukin-6; iPTH = intact parathyroid hormone; PBMC = peripheral blood mononuclear cell; RAAS = renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; T2D = type 2 diabetes; T4 = thyroxine 4; TNF = tumor necrosis factor; TSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone.
Obtained at each bariatric clinic visit.
Obtained at baseline (enrollment), after 3 mo on study drug (preoperative), 1, 6, and 12 mo postoperatively.
Obtained at each postoperative bariatric clinic visit up to 12 mo.
Based on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) criteria.
We will collect data on surgical outcomes, weight loss, and metabolic outcomes (improvement of hypertension, glycemic control, dyslipidemia, and need for type 2 diabetes medications). Patients will be seen back in the MBS clinic at 2 wk, 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-mo post operatively at which time they will undergo anthropometric measurements including body composition analysis.
Analysis Plan
The primary outcome will be post-tirzepatide tissue and circulating inflammatory markers at the time of surgery, and their relationship with postoperative metabolic and inflammatory profiles. Secondary outcomes will include clinical/surgical outcomes, including percent excess weight loss, comorbidity improvement/resolution, and 30-d surgical complications. Differences between treated and nontreated patients will be assessed using linear and logistic mixed models (for continuous or binary outcomes with repeated measurements per patient) or using two-sample t-tests and chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests (for continuous or categorical outcomes with single measurements per patient). All model assumptions, including normality, will be assessed using a combination of visual plots and formal testing. Likelihood ratio testing and Akaike Information Criterion will be used to select an appropriate covariance structure for each mixed model, and a Kenward—Roger adjustment will be used to correct for negative bias in the standard error and degrees of freedom calculations in these models. Across all analyses, a statistical significance level of α = 0.05 will be used. Given the low enrollment goal for this pilot trial, including patients in the treatment arm that do not actually complete the treatment could significantly skew results. Thus, the primary analysis will be performed per-protocol; patients who do not move forward with the surgery or do not complete the medication protocol will be withdrawn. Intention-to-treat analysis will only be performed as a sensitivity analysis.
Limitations
This trial is centered on a single academic medical center experience and is not generalizable to larger groups or more diverse patient populations. Additionally, our design is limited to a 3-mo treatment window prior to MBS. Longer duration and reinstatement of use postoperatively may improve long-term outcomes. Finally, our pilot RCT is limited to 50 participants.
Conclusions/Anticipated Outcomes
There is an increased focus on multimodal management for obesity. Injectable GLP-1 RAs have become popular in recent years as they accomplish weight loss with ease of use and result in improvement of metabolic and cardiovascular parameters. With medications alone, long-term efficacy, affordability and sustained metabolic benefit especially for higher BMI patients remain questionable as long-term data are lacking. For severe obesity, MBS remains the most effective and durable independent treatment modality with a high safety profile. This study seeks to test the hypothesis that incorporating preoperative GLP-1/GIP RA as a neo-adjuvant therapy might improve perioperative surgical, metabolic, and weight loss outcomes. There is abundant literature on the role of GLP-1 RAs in reducing circulating inflammatory mediators30,33,48,49; however, their effect on tissue-level inflammation in humans has not been studied due to inaccessibility of tissue samples. This study capitalizes on the opportunity to collect tissue samples intraoperatively in a unique surgical population that is also eligible for GLP1 therapy. Limited data at the tissue-level, along with lack of clinical outcome data on concurrent use of injectable GLP-1 RAs with MBS highlight the novelty of this study. We expect that treatment with tirzepatide in a multidisciplinary setting with close clinical monitoring, nutritional support, and lifestyle changes will result in additional preoperative weight loss, improved fatty liver changes, and reduced systemic and tissue level inflammation which will result in reduced surgical complications, increased overall weight loss, and improved cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes.
Future Directions
Pending analyses of preliminary data from this pilot RCT, we aim to develop a larger multicenter RCT encompassing a broader patient cohort undergoing primary MBS to gain further insight into which patients would benefit from preoperative treatment with tirzepatide and most appropriate treatment duration. Whether certain patients would further benefit from postoperative GLP-1 therapy is another question of interest to follow-up in subsequent trials.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the following for their assistance in this project: Matthew Hazzard, BS, Graphic Artisit; Seth Larkin, PharmD in Investigational Drug Services; Marianna Nercesian, Karen Shearer, Adrienne James clinical coordinators in the Barnstable Brown Diabetes Center; and Mary Beth Keaton and Lauren Crockett in the Bariatric Surgery Clinic.
Funding
This project was funded by the Office of the Provost, the Vice President for Research (VPR), University of Kentucky and the College of Medicine Executive Clinical Expert Leadership (EXCEL) Research Initiative, Department of Surgery, Diabetes and Obesity Research Priority Area, and Barnstable Brown Diabetes Center at the University of Kentucky.
Footnotes
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Varun Jain: Writing — review & editing, Writing — original draft, Project administration, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Colleen A. McMullen: Writing — review & editing, Writing — original draft, Project administration. Joy I. Kimbrough: Writing — review & editing, Project administration, Methodology, Conceptualization. Anna K. Rockich: Writing — review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Conceptualization. Daniel L. Davenport: Writing — review & editing, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Gregory S. Hawk: Writing — review & editing, Methodology, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Barbara S. Nikolajczyk: Writing — review & editing, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Conceptualization. Philip A. Kern: Writing — review & editing, Resources, Conceptualization. Simon J. Fisher: Writing — review & editing, Resources, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Joshua P. Steiner: Writing — review & editing, Resources. William B. Inabnet: Writing — review & editing, Resources, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Marlene E. Starr: Writing — review & editing, Writing — original draft, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.
Disclosure
None declared.
Data Availability
Due to the nature of the study, participants were assured that raw data would remain confidential. Deidentified data will be shared on clinicaltrials.gov.
REFERENCES
- 1.Obesity and overweight. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Adult Obesity Prevalence Maps. Center for disease control. Atlanta, GA: CDC; 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Most Obese States; 2025. Lancaster, PA: World Population Review; 2025. https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/most-obese-states [Accessed October 15 2025]. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Verrastro O, Panunzi S, Castagneto-Gissey L, et al. Bariatric-metabolic surgery versus lifestyle intervention plus best medical care in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (BRAVES): a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet. 2023;401:1786–1797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Michalec BK, Lenart-Boroń AM, Cupak AK, Wałęga AS. The evaluation of heavy metal content in water and sediments of small reservoirs in light of various environmental quality regulations. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2014;49:827–832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, et al. Metabolic surgery versus conventional medical therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: 10-year follow-up of an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;397:293–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cheng A, Yeoh E, Moh A, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus best medical treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults with body mass index between 27 and 32 kg/m(2): a 5-year randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;188:109900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ilanga M, Heard JC, McClintic J, et al. Use of GLP-1 agonists in high risk patients prior to bariatric surgery: a cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2023;37:9509–9513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sjöström L,Narbro K, Sjöström CD, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:741–752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.O’Brien PE, Brennan L, Laurie C, Brown W. Intensive medical weight loss or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of mild to moderate obesity: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomised trial. Obes Surg. 2013;23:1345–1353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, et al. Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1577–1585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pipek LZ, Moraes WAF, Nobetani RM, et al. Surgery is associated with better long-term outcomes than pharmacological treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Rep. 2024;14:9521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes - 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:641–651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Aminian A, Kashyap SR, Wolski KE, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after metabolic surgery versus medical therapy for diabetes: insights from the STAMPEDE randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2021;274:524–532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hutcheon DA, Hale AL, Ewing JA, et al. Short-term preoperative weight loss and postoperative outcomes in bariatric surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226:514–524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ali MR, Baucom-Pro S, Broderick-Villa GA, et al. Weight loss before gastric bypass: feasibility and effect on postoperative weight loss and weight loss maintenance. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:515–520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sun Y, Liu B, Smith JK, et al. Association of preoperative body weight and weight loss with risk of death after bariatric surgery. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e204803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Saleh OS, Farag YMK, Medhati P, Tavakkoli A. Impact of preoperative weight loss on 30-Day complication rate after bariatric surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2024;238:993–999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sen O, Turkcapar AG. Effect of pre-operative weight loss on patients’ outcomes undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. J Minim Access Surg. 2022;18:260–263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Forst T, De Block C, Del Prato S, et al. Novel pharmacotherapies for weight loss: understanding the role of incretins to enable weight loss and improved health outcomes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025;27:48–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Alfaris N, Waldrop S, Johnson V, Boaventura B, Kendrick K, Stanford FC. GLP-1 single, dual, and triple receptor agonists for treating type 2 diabetes and obesity: a narrative review. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;75:102782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Moiz A, Filion KB, Tsoukas MA, Yu OHY, Peters TM, Eisenberg MJ. The expanding role of GLP-1 receptor agonists: a narrative review of current evidence and future directions. EClinicalMedicine. 2025;86:103363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jastreboff AM, Aronne LJ, Ahmad NN, et al. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity. N Engl J Med. 2022;387:205–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, et al. Once-Weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:989–1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Davies M, et al. Weight regain and cardiometabolic effects after withdrawal of semaglutide: the STEP 1 trial extension. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022;24:1553–1564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rubino D, Abrahamsson N, Davies M, et al. Effect of continued weekly subcutaneous semaglutide vs placebo on weight loss maintenance in adults with overweight or obesity: the STEP 4 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;325:1414–1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cohen RV, Park JY, Prager G, et al. Role of obesity-management medications before and after metabolic bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Br J Surg. 2024;111:znae284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tan YW, Shang M, Davis S, Gananadha S. GLP-1 receptor agonists as an adjunct to bariatric surgery for weight loss and metabolic outcome improvement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025;410:295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zheng Z, Zong Y, Ma Y, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor: mechanisms and advances in therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9:234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mehdi SF, Pusapati S, Anwar MS, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1: a multi-faceted anti-inflammatory agent. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1148209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wong CK, Drucker DJ. Antiinflammatory actions of glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapies beyond metabolic benefits. J Clin Invest. 2025;135:e194751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rakipovski G, Rolin B, Nøhr J, et al. The GLP-1 analogs liraglutide and semaglutide reduce atherosclerosis in ApoE(−/−) and LDLr(−/−) mice by a mechanism that includes inflammatory pathways. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2018;3:844–857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wong CK, McLean BA, Baggio LL, et al. Central glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor activation inhibits toll-like receptor agonist-induced inflammation. Cell Metab. 2024;36:130–143.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chaudhuri A, Ghanim H, Vora M, et al. Exenatide exerts a potent antiinflammatory effect. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:198–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bray JJH, Foster-Davies H, Salem A, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists improve biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23:1806–1822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Park HS, Park JY, Yu R. Relationship of obesity and visceral adiposity with serum concentrations of CRP, TNF-alpha and IL-6. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005;69:29–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Visser M, Bouter LM, McQuillan GM, Wener MH, Harris TB. Elevated C-reactive protein levels in overweight and obese adults. JAMA. 1999;282:2131–2135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ren Y, Chen Y, Zheng W, et al. The effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on circulating inflammatory markers in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025;27:3607–3626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Askarpour M, Khani D, Sheikhi A, Ghaedi E, Alizadeh S. Effect of bariatric surgery on serum inflammatory factors of Obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2019;29:2631–2647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Illán-Gómez F, Gonzálvez-Ortega M, Orea-Soler I, et al. Obesity and inflammation: change in adiponectin, C-reactive protein, tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2012;22:950–955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Farias G, Netto BDM, Boritza K, Bettini SC, Vilela RM, Daâmaso AR. Impact of weight loss on inflammation state and endothelial markers among individuals with extreme obesity after gastric bypass surgery: a 2-Year Follow-up study. Obes Surg. 2020;30:1881–1890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Huang J, Chen Y, Wang X, Wang C, Yang J, Guan B. Change in adipokines and gastrointestinal hormones after bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2023;33:789–806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kim JE, Kim JS, Jo MJ, et al. The roles and associated mechanisms of adipokines in development of metabolic syndrome. Molecules. 2022;27:334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pico C, Palou M, Pomar CA, Rodríguez AM, Palou A. Leptin as a key regulator of the adipose organ. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022;23:13–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kalupahana NS, Moustaid-Moussa N. The renin-angiotensin system: a link between obesity, inflammation and insulin resistance. Obes Rev. 2012;13:136–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sharma AM, Engeli S. Obesity and the renin- angiotensin-aldosterone system. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 2006;1:255–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Luther JM, Brown NJ. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and glucose homeostasis. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2011;32:734–739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sun H, Hao Y, Liu H, Gao F. The immunomodulatory effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists in neurogenerative diseases and ischemic stroke treatment. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1525623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Xia Y, Jin J, Sun Y, et al. Tirzepatide’s role in targeting adipose tissue macrophages to reduce obesity-related inflammation and improve insulin resistance. Int Immunopharmacol. 2024;143:113499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Due to the nature of the study, participants were assured that raw data would remain confidential. Deidentified data will be shared on clinicaltrials.gov.
