Abstract
Adoptive cell therapy has witnessed significant progress with the success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells for treating cancer. However, their autologous nature limits scalability, and increases production time and manufacturing costs. Additionally, CAR-T cell administration can result in severe toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. To address these issues, allogeneic, natural killer (NK) cells are being explored as an alternative. NK cells are cytotoxic lymphocytes that play a pivotal role in tumor surveillance and eradication. Unlike T cells, NK cells can identify and eliminate targets without MHC restriction or prior sensitization. Furthermore, NK cells exhibit enhanced responses after exposure to virus infections or cytokine activation (cytokine induced memory-like). Allogeneic NK cell therapies offer a promising alternative to autologous cell therapies, with reduced risk of graft-versus-host disease and rapid availability. This review summarizes the current landscape of allogeneic memory-like NK cell therapies, including clinical applications and challenges.
Keywords: Transplantation, natural killer cells, cancer immunotherapy, adoptive transfer
Introduction
Natural killer (NK) cells are cytotoxic lymphocytes, critical to the innate immune system, that can attack and eliminate virally infected cells or cancerous cells without prior sensitization.1 NK cells are the founding members to a rapidly expanding family of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) and represent about 5–20% of all circulating lymphocytes in humans.2,3 NK cells can respond immediately and independently of antigen presentation, making them valuable for off-the-shelf therapies.4 While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have revolutionized the field of adoptive cell therapy for treating cancer, especially the hematological malignancies including multiple myeloma and lymphoma, their use is associated with severe adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity, and graft versus host disease (GVHD).5 Current CAR-T therapies are autologous (e.g. patient-derived), thus limiting scalability and increasing manufacturing time and cost. A safer and scalable allogeneic (unrelated donor-derived) alternative approach is vital for expanding the patient pool for cell therapies. Recent advances have been made in our understanding of NK cell biology, including their memory-like (ML) properties. Additionally, improved techniques for NK cell isolation, expansion, and engineering have been developed. These discoveries have led to advances in both preclinical and clinical research into NK cell-based therapies. In this context, CAR NK and CAR ML NK cells represent a promising, safer, allogeneic, off-the-shelf alternative to CAR T cells with lower risk of CRS, broader tumor recognition, and improved activity in immunosuppressive conditions.4
NK Cell Biology
Development
NK cells are innate immune cells that develop from common lymphoid progenitors in the bone marrow.6 NK cell development requires IL-15 and transcription factors like T-bet and eomesodermin.7,8 Human NK cells are phenotypically identified by CD56 expression and the absence of CD3. They are mainly classified into two major subsets based on the expression levels of CD56: CD56bright and CD56dim NK cells.3 CD56dim NK cells are mature, express the activating receptor CD16 that is critical in mediating antibody induced cellular cytotoxicity,9 and comprise most circulating NK cells.3 CD56dim NK cells mainly mediate cytotoxic responses due to their high content of cytolytic granules containing perforin and granzymes.10 CD56bright NK cells are less differentiated and give rise to 56dim NK cell subsets; they constitute a minority of circulating NK cells while representing the predominant NK subset in tissues.3 CD56bright NK cells are highly responsive to cytokine stimulation and produce cytokines robustly in response to activation. Recent studies reveal that CD56bright NK cells can be primed by IL-15 allowing for increased cytotoxicity, challenging the paradigm that immature CD56bright NK cells do not kill.11
NK Receptors
Human NK cells express a variety of activating and inhibitory receptors that regulate their activity against target cells.12 They are a complex group of receptors using opposing signaling motifs to either stimulate or inhibit activation. NK cell activating receptors (e.g. NKp46, Nkp30) detect stress-induced ligands, viral antigens and altered self-cells like infected or cancerous cells. NK cell activating receptors associate with adaptor molecules (e.g. DAP10/12), which contain immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs).12 Upon binding to ligand, adaptor associated ITAMs start a cascade of intracellular signaling which leads to the release of cytotoxic granules containing perforin and granzymes, and cytokine production (e.g., IFN-γ). It is reported that stimulation of one activation receptor is not sufficient for cytokine secretion and cytotoxic function, rather stimulation of multiple receptors is required for NK cell effector function.13,14 The inhibitory receptors prevent NK cell cytotoxicity against normal, healthy cells.15 Self-tolerance occurs via their recognition of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecule, which is expressed on almost all normal nucleated cells. The key inhibitory receptors on human NK cells include inhibitory killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (iKIR) and NKG2A, which contain immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs (ITIMs).16 Upon binding of the receptor to their cognate ligands, ITIMs recruit phosphatases that inhibit activating signaling cascades. Healthy cells express MHC-I and thereby avoid NK cell attack. In contrast, virus-infected or malignantly-transformed cells may down regulate MHC-I expression to evade recognition by cytotoxic T cells, while simultaneously becoming targets for NK cell killing.6,17,18
Cytokine Receptors
Understanding the primary role of the cytokine receptors that NK cells express and how they tune NK responses is critical for the development of optimal memory-like NK cell therapies, particularly in off-the-shelf, allogeneic, settings.19,20 Cytokine receptor signaling not only regulates the survival, activation, proliferation, and effector function of NK cells, but also modulates the epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming involved in memory-like NK cell development.21–23 Key cytokines that play the main role in regulating NK cell biology include common gamma chain cytokines like interleukin (IL)-2,15,7, 21.24 IL-12 and IL-18 are also potent NK cell activators that are secreted by dendritic cells and macrophages; they promote NK cell production of cytokines including IFN-γ, and prime NK cells for maximal effector function.25 IL-2 and IL-15 signal via STAT5 and are indispensable for NK cell development, homeostasis and in vivo persistence.26 Additionally, type I interferon (IFN) receptor signaling is important for NK cell maturation, activation, expansion and cytotoxicity.27,28 Cytokine-induced ML NK cells, a distinct subset of NK cells, have emerged in the field of allogeneic cell therapies and have shown promising therapeutic results via clinical trials.22,29–32 Brief activation of NK cells with IL-12, IL-15 and IL-18 endow them with memory-like properties including enhanced functionality upon restimulation and persistence in vivo, all underwritten by distinct epigenetic changes.4,17,21,23
Generating ML NK cells. Allogeneic ML NK cell therapy involves isolating NK cells from healthy donors, followed by brief activation with IL-12/15/18. The activated NK cells are washed of cytokines and infused into recipients. While peripheral blood is the most common source of mature, cytotoxic NK cells suitable for rapid therapeutic use, limited cell numbers may necessitate ex vivo expansion for an off the-shelf-product.
Clinical Applications
Studies in both mice and humans have shown that the enhanced functional properties of ML NK cells are maintained following cell division, indicating a heritable and epigenetically programmed phenotype.23,33 Moreover, ML NK cells have been detected in vivo for prolonged periods, highlighting their potential for sustained therapeutic activity.21,30,31 ML NK cells have also shown improved anti-tumor responses across several malignancies, including lymphoma, multiple myeloma, melanoma, colorectal cancer, and head and neck cancers.34–37 These preclinical insights led to the clinical translation of donor-derived ML NK cells in a first-in-human trial for leukemia, where the approach was well tolerated and resulted in complete remissions (CR) in 87% (13/15) treated patients.30 Although ML NK cell therapies have shown promise in clinical settings for hematologic cancers, their effectiveness against solid tumors requires further investigaton. To fully harness the therapeutic potential of ML NK cells, especially against solid tumors, CAR-engineered ML NK cells have become a potent next-generation cell therapy strategy.38 In this approach, ML NK cells are genetically modified to express CARs which are synthetic receptors designed to target NK cells to tumor-specific antigens.39 Several tumor-associated antigens have been studied as CAR targets, including CD33, CD19, BCMA, and EphA2. Through these studies, CAR engineering has consistently been shown to enhance the responsiveness of ML NK cells against their targets.34,37,40 Combining the specificity of CAR technology and enhanced functionality of ML NK cells, may be a promising treatment for solid tumors. Currently, significant efforts are directed towards investigating ML NK cell therapies in allogeneic settings through ongoing clinical trials (Table 1).
Table 1.
Overview of current active and enrolling clinical trials using cytokine-induced memory-like NK cells.
| NCT Number | Study Title | Conditions | Sponsor | Collaborators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT05629546 | Memory-Like Natural Killer Cells With Nivolumab and Relatlimab in Advanced or Metastatic Melanoma After Progression on Checkpoint Inhibitors | Melanoma | Washington University School of Medicine | Melanoma Research Alliance|Rising Tide Foundation |
| NCT06138587 | Preemptive CIML NK Cell Therapy After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation | Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Leukemia, Myeloproliferative Neoplasm MyeloproliferativeDisorders | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute | |
| NCT06321484 | Intraperitoneal Cytokine-Induced Memory Like (CIML) Natural Killer (NK) Cells in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer | Ovarian Cancer | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute | ImmunityBio, Inc. |
| NCT06318871 | Memory-like Natural Killer (NK) Cell Therapy in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma or Urothelial Carcinoma | Renal Cell Carcinoma, Urothelial Carcinoma | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute | Kidney Cancer Association |
| NCT06152809 | CIML NK Cells With Venetoclax for AML | Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute | |
| NCT07011004 | A Study of Natural Killer Cells in Combination With Atezolizumab in People With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia | Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center | Genentech, Inc. |
| NCT05580601 | Cytokine-Induced Memory-Like Natural Killer Cells (CIML-NK) for Relapsed & Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati | |
| NCT06158828 | Pilot Study of Memory-like Natural Killer (ML NK) Cells After TCRαβ T Cell Depleted Haploidentical Transplant in AML | Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Washington University School of Medicine | The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society|Rising Tide Foundation|St. Louis Children's Hospital Foundation|Children's' Discovery Institute |
Challenges and Limitations
Despite the breakthrough and the promising results of allogeneic ML NK cells as off-the-shelf therapy in clinical trials, this strategy requires further optimization. Although ML NK cells showed enhanced longevity and persistence over conventional NK cells, long-term persistence may be limited by host immune rejection of donor cells due to HLA mismatching.41 Limited in vivo persistence will require either repeated administration or further engineering to enhance NK cell lifespan. Moreover, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) may limit the infiltration and functionality of ML NK cells. Combination therapies that dampen inhibitory signaling in the TME should be investigated.
Strategies for Overcoming Barriers
Strategies for improving ML NK cell-based therapies are directed towards enhancing their targeting, decreasing TME suppression, and increasing functional persistence. Genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 is being researched as a way to reduce alloreactivity by knocking out HLA molecules or inhibitory molecules.22,42 Engineered ML NK cells to express CARs designed to target specific tumor antigens and increase ML NK cell homing into solid tumors are also being explored.39 Additionally, combining ML NK cells with immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-NKG2A may help overcome the immunosuppressive TME.37 Moreover, optimizing cytokine support to enhance in vivo expansion, persistence and cytotoxic potential, may be critical for improving the clinical efficacy of ML NK cell therapies. A potential method may be to engineer ML NK cells to express membrane-bound IL-15 or IL-2 to improve therapeutic durability and reduce associated toxicities.43,44
Conclusions and Future Directions
Substantial clinical progress has been made in demonstrating the feasibility and efficacy of cellular immunotherapies for cancer and are starting to be made for viral infections. However, studies have revealed that choices made in the clinic without pre-clinical testing, can negatively impact patient outcomes.45 Outstanding questions include 1) How do in vivo dynamics like NK cell expansion correlate with patient responses? 2) Does CAR ML NK cell persistence matter for response? 3) Can factors like chemokine receptors and integrins help direct and retain CAR ML NK cells in the tumor? and 4) What is the capacity for CAR ML NK cells to modulate the endogenous immune system? One major challenge in using CAR-engineered cells in patients is identifying safe, high-density tumor antigens that have the potential for minor on-target-off tumor effects yet maximum on-target-on-tumor activity. However, even with the best scFv, delivering CAR-engineered lymphocytes to solid tumors is a major barrier in the field, underscored by the challenges that have been experienced in moving CAR T cell therapy beyond hematologic malignancies and into solid tumors.46 Advances made in correlative immunology associated with clinical trials have revealed a new wave of questions that cannot be experimentally addressed in the clinical setting or using xenograft systems. Indeed, we now require controlled model systems to assess pertinent questions in the field and dissect underlying mechanisms operative in adoptive cell therapy immunomodulation. Basic, mechanistic studies are required to determine factors that impact CAR ML NK cell trafficking, persistence, and effector functions. Murine models will also allow us to simultaneously understand the basic cellular mechanisms that distinguish cytokine-induced ML NK and CAR versus endogenous receptor mediated signals that impact NK cell anti-tumor activity in immune-competent settings.
Acknowledgment
Figure and table were created with Biorender.com. MMB-E was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute (K22CA279495).
Figure 1.
Schema for generating memory-like NK cell therapies. Briefly, peripheral blood NK cells are isolated from healthy donors and are activated, may be engineered, expanded, and cryopreserved for off-the-shelf administration.
Footnotes
Alaa M. Khalifa, PhD, is at Augusts University, Augusta, Georgia, USA. Melissa M. Berrien-Elliott, PhD, (pictured), is in the Departments of Microbiology and Molecular Immunology, Internal Medicine, and Department of Pediatrics, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Disclosure: MMB-E discloses equity in Wugen. AK has no disclosures. Artificial intelligence, language models, machine learning, or similar technologies were not used in the conceptualization, study, research, preparation, or writing of this manuscript.
References
- 1.Caligiuri MA. Human natural killer cells. Blood. 2008;112(3):461–469. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-09-077438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Colonna M. Innate Lymphoid Cells: Diversity, Plasticity, and Unique Functions in Immunity. Immunity. 2018;48(6):1104–1117. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cooper MA, Fehniger TA, Caligiuri MA. The biology of human natural killer-cell subsets. Trends Immunol. 2001;22(11):633–640. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4906(01)02060-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Berrien-Elliott MM, Jacobs MT, Fehniger TA. Allogeneic natural killer cell therapy. Blood. 2023;141(8):856–868. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022016200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.June CH, O’Connor RS, Kawalekar OU, Ghassemi S, Milone MC. CAR T cell immunotherapy for human cancer. Science. 2018;359(6382):1361–1365. doi: 10.1126/science.aar6711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cichocki F, Sitnicka E, Bryceson YT. NK cell development and function - Plasticity and redundancy unleashed. Semin Immunol. 2014;26(2):114–126. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2014.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wong P, Foltz JA, Chang L, et al. T-BET and EOMES sustain mature human NK cell identity and antitumor function. J Clin Invest. 2023;133(13):e162530. doi: 10.1172/JCI162530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fehniger TA, Caligiuri MA. Interleukin 15: biology and relevance to human disease. Blood. 2001;97(1):14–32. doi: 10.1182/blood.V97.1.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Capuano C, Pighi C, Battella S, De Federicis D, Galandrini R, Palmieri G. Harnessing CD16-Mediated NK Cell Functions to Enhance Therapeutic Efficacy of Tumor-Targeting mAbs. Cancers. 2021;13(10):2500. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Boudreau JE, Hsu KC. Natural Killer Cell Education and the Response to Infection and Cancer Therapy: Stay Tuned. Trends Immunol. 2018;39(3):222–239. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2017.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wagner JA, Rosario M, Romee R, et al. CD56bright NK cells exhibit potent antitumor responses following IL-15 priming. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(11):4042–4058. doi: 10.1172/JCI90387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lanier LL. NK cell receptors. Annu Rev Immunol. 1998;16:359–393. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bryceson YT, March ME, Ljunggren H, gustaf G, Long EO. Synergy among receptors on resting NK cells for the activation of natural cytotoxicity and cytokine secretion. Blood. 2006;107(1):159–166. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-04-1351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bryceson YT, Chiang SCC, Darmanin S, et al. Molecular mechanisms of natural killer cell activation. J Innate Immun. 2011;3(3):216–226. doi: 10.1159/000325265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Anfossi N, André P, Guia S, et al. Human NK Cell Education by Inhibitory Receptors for MHC Class I. Immunity. 2006;25(2):331–342. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lanier LL. Natural killer cell receptor signaling. Curr Opin Immunol. 2003;15(3)(03):308–314. 00039–6. doi: 10.1016/S0952-7915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Khalifa AM, Nakamura T, Sato Y, Harashima H. Vaccination with a combination of STING agonist-loaded lipid nanoparticles and CpG-ODNs protects against lung metastasis via the induction of CD11bhighCD27low memory-like NK cells. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2024;13(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40164-024-00502-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Khalifa AM, Nakamura T, Sato Y, et al. Interval- and cycle-dependent combined effect of STING agonist loaded lipid nanoparticles and a PD-1 antibody. Int J Pharm. 2022;624:122034. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Konjević GM, Vuletić AM, Mirjačić, Martinović KM, Larsen AK, Jurišić VB. The role of cytokines in the regulation of NK cells in the tumor environment. Cytokine. 2019;117:30–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2019.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Romee R, Leong JW, Fehniger TA. Utilizing cytokines to function-enable human NK cells for the immunotherapy of cancer. Scientifica. doi: 10.1155/2014/205796. Published online January 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Foltz JA, Tran J, Wong P, et al. Cytokines drive the formation of memory-like NK cell subsets via epigenetic rewiring and transcriptional regulation. Sci Immunol. 2024;9(96):eadk4893. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.adk4893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Berrien-Elliott MM, Cashen AF, Cubitt CC, et al. Multidimensional Analyses of Donor Memory-Like NK Cells Reveal New Associations with Response after Adoptive Immunotherapy for Leukemia. Cancer Discov. 2020;10(12):1854–1871. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Berrien-Elliott MM, Wagner JA, Fehniger TA. Human Cytokine-Induced Memory-Like Natural Killer Cells. J Innate Immun. 2015;7(6):563–571. doi: 10.1159/000382019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lin JX, Leonard WJ. Fine-Tuning Cytokine Signals. Annu Rev Immunol. 2019;37:295–324. doi: 10.1146/annurevimmunol-042718-041447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Walzer T, Dalod M, Robbins SH, Zitvogel L, Vivier E. Natural-killer cells and dendritic cells: “l’union fait la force.”. Blood. 2005;106(7):2252–2258. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cooper MA, Bush JE, Fehniger TA, et al. In vivo evidence for a dependence on interleukin 15 for survival of natural killer cells. Blood. 2002;100(10):3633–3638. doi: 10.1182/blood-2001-12-0293. Supported. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Madera S, Rapp M, Firth MA, Beilke JN, Lanier LL, Sun JC. Type I IFN promotes NK cell expansion during viral infection by protecting NK cells against fratricide. J Exp Med. 2016;213(2):225–233. doi: 10.1084/jem.20150712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Guan J, Miah SMS, Wilson ZS, Erick TK, Banh C, Brossay L. Role of Type I Interferon Receptor Signaling on NK Cell Development and Functions. Mattei F, editor. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e111302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Terrén I, Orrantia A, Astarloa-Pando G, Amarilla-Irusta A, Zenarruzabeitia O, Borrego F. Cytokine-Induced Memory-Like NK Cells: From the Basics to Clinical Applications. Front Immunol. 2022;13:884648. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.884648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Berrien-Elliott MM, Foltz JA, Russler-Germain DA, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation donor-derived memory-like NK cells functionally persist after transfer into patients with leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2022;14(633):eabm1375. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abm1375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bednarski JJ, Zimmerman C, Berrien-Elliott MM, et al. Donor memory-like NK cells persist and induce remissions in pediatric patients with relapsed AML after transplant. Blood. 2022;139(11):1670–1683. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021013972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Romee R, Rosario M, Berrien-Elliott MM, et al. Cytokine-induced memory-like natural killer cells exhibit enhanced responses against myeloid leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(357):357ra123. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf2341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fehniger TA, Cooper MA. Harnessing NK Cell Memory for Cancer Immunotherapy Trends Immunol. 2016;37(12):877–888. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2016.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jacobs MT, Wong P, Zhou AY, et al. Memory-like Differentiation, Tumor-Targeting mAbs, and Chimeric Antigen Receptors Enhance Natural Killer Cell Responses to Head and Neck Cancer. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2023;29(20):4196–4208. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-0156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Marin ND, Krasnick BA, Becker-Hapak M, et al. Memory-like Differentiation Enhances NK Cell Responses to Melanoma. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2021;27(17):4859–4869. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Marin ND, Becker-Hapak M, Song WM, et al. Memory-like differentiation enhances NK cell responses against colorectal cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2024;13(1):2348254. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2024.2348254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhou AY, Marin ND, Afrin S, et al. Memory-like NK cell differentiation, inhibitory NKG2A blockade, and improved recognition via antibody or CAR engineering combine to enhance NK cell attack against multiple myeloma. J Immunol Baltim Md. 1950;2025;214(1):1–11. doi: 10.1093/jimmun/vkae004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gang M, Wong P, Berrien-Elliott MM, Fehniger TA. Memory-like natural killer cells for cancer immunotherapy. Semin Hematol. 2020;57(4):185–193. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2020.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Peng L, Sferruzza G, Yang L, Zhou L, Chen S. CAR-T and CAR-NK as cellular cancer immunotherapy for solid tumors. Cell Mol Immunol. 2024;21(10):1089–1108. doi: 10.1038/s41423-024-01207-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gang M, Marin NDD, Wong P, et al. CAR-modified memory-like NK cells exhibit potent responses to NK-resistant lymphomas. Blood. 2020;136(20):2308–2318. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020006619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Berrien-Elliott MM, Becker-Hapak M, Cashen AF, et al. Systemic IL-15 promotes allogeneic cell rejection in patients treated with natural killer cell adoptive therapy. Blood. 2021;139(8):1177–1183. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021011532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhu H, Blum RH, Bernareggi D, et al. Metabolic Reprograming via Deletion of CISH in Human iPSC-Derived NK Cells Promotes In Vivo Persistence and Enhances Anti-tumor Activity. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27(2)(e6):224–237. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Christodoulou I, Ho WJ, Marple A, et al. Engineering CAR-NK cells to secrete IL-15 sustains their anti-AML functionality but is associated with systemic toxicities. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(12) doi: 10.1136/JITC-2021-003894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Liu E, Tong Y, Dotti G, et al. Cord blood NK cells engineered to express IL-15 and a CD19-targeted CAR show long-term persistence and potent antitumor activity. Leukemia. 2018;32(2):520–531. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Berrien-Elliott MM, Becker-Hapak M, Cashen AF, et al. Systemic IL-15 promotes allogeneic cell rejection in patients treated with natural killer cell adoptive therapy. Blood. 2022;139(8):1177–1183. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021011532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wagner J, Wickman E, DeRenzo C, Gottschalk S. CAR T Cell Therapy for Solid Tumors: Bright Future or Dark Reality? Mol Ther. 2020;28(11):2320–2339. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


