Abstract
Vascular dementia (VaD) is a type of dementia caused by cerebrovascular factors, which can arise from both ischemic cerebrovascular disease and hemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease. The incidence rate of VaD is second only to Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Currently, there are no effective drugs specifically targeting VaD, making the discovery of new therapeutic targets of great significance. This article provides an overview of the research progress on VaD, with a focus on elucidating its pathogenesis, aiming to identify targets that play a regulatory role in the mechanism. Finally, our attention is drawn to the transcription factor E2F1. Through research, it has been found that E2F1 is involved in biological processes such as cell cycle regulation and apoptosis and plays a certain role in neurodegenerative diseases and ischemic encephalopathy. It also participates in the pathogenesis of vascular dementia, suggesting that E2F1 is a key regulatory molecule for VaD and may become a potential pharmacological therapeutic target, which warrants further in-depth research.
Keywords: vascular dementia (VaD), pathogenesis, E2F1, therapeutic target
1. Introduction
Vascular dementia (VaD) is a type of dementia caused by cerebrovascular factors, which can be induced by ischemic cerebrovascular disease and hemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease [1]. Its clinical manifestations include memory impairment; impaired attention, information processing ability, and executive function; early gait disorders; and depression, apathy, and personality changes [2,3]. According to estimates by the World Health Organization, approximately 82 million people will suffer from dementia by 2050 [4]. Among all subtypes of dementia, vascular dementia accounts for about 20% of the total prevalence of dementia [5], second only to Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies [6]. The average age at onset, diagnosis, and death for vascular dementia is 67.5 ± 7.2 years, 73.5 ± 7.0 years, and 77.0 ± 6.9 years, respectively. The survival time after diagnosis (3.2 ± 1.4 years) is shorter than that of common dementias such as Alzheimer’s disease (5.8 ± 2.0 years) and dementia with Lewy bodies (4.7 ± 1.8 years) [7]. Vascular dementia is associated with multiple risk factors, and the risk factors for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases are also risk factors for vascular dementia, mainly including poor dietary habits [8], obesity [9], hypertension [10], hypercholesterolemia [11], excessive alcohol consumption [12], diabetes [13], smoking [14], and lack of exercise [15]. Vascular dementia is mainly divided into four subtypes: post-stroke dementia, subcortical ischemic vascular dementia, multi-infarct dementia, and mixed dementia [16]. This is why the pathogenesis of vascular dementia is complex, but the main pathogenesis of different vascular dementia subtypes is common [17]. The current drug treatment for vascular dementia mainly focuses on controlling vascular risk factors, improving cerebral blood flow and neuroprotection. The clinical medications mainly include cholinesterase inhibitors such as donepezil and galantamine, as well as the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist memantine. These drugs were originally used for Alzheimer’s disease. Although they are now also used for the treatment of vascular dementia, they only have a mild improvement effect on specific types of vascular dementia, such as mixed dementia, and are not sufficient to support their widespread use in patients with vascular dementia [18]. The role of epigenetic regulation and transcriptional factors is gradually being emphasized. Research in this area may help identify potential pharmacological therapeutic targets for vascular dementia. This review proposes that the transcription factor E2F1, as a multi-dimensional regulatory molecule, may become a promising new pharmacological therapeutic target for vascular dementia.
2. The Etiology, Pathology, and Pathogenesis of VaD
2.1. Etiology and Pathology
The primary etiology of vascular dementia is neuronal injury resulting from chronic cerebral hypoperfusion induced by vascular lesions. Vascular lesions mainly refer to large vessel diseases such as carotid stenosis, as well as small vessel diseases, including small (micro) infarcts, microbleeds, cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), arteriosclerosis, and genetic cerebral arterial diseases such as Notch 3 gene defects [19,20,21]. The brain parenchyma is supplied with blood by perforating arteries, which originate from the external cerebral arteries and form a complex anastomotic network of blood supply after penetrating the brain. Insufficient blood supply from the external cerebral arteries can lead to decreased blood flow in the perforating arteries, which results in white matter lesions and gray matter neuronal damage [22,23]. The spaces surrounding the perforating arteries, called Virchow-Robin spaces (abbreviated as VRS), serve as lymphatic drainage channels in the brain [24,25,26]. The pathological manifestation of VRS in small-vessel diseases is widening, which can lead to lymphatic clearance dysfunction and cause nerve cell damage [27,28,29].
2.2. Pathogenesis
2.2.1. Excitotoxicity
Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion can induce excitotoxicity in the central nervous system, which is one of the pathogeneses of vascular dementia [30,31,32]. Excitotoxicity refers to the death of neuronal cells caused by the continuous activation of excitatory amino acid receptors. Glutamate is the predominant excitatory amino acid in the brain. Ischemia and hypoxia lead to the continuous release of glutamate from presynaptic neurons, which excessively activates postsynaptic excitatory amino acid receptors such as N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDAR), causing a large influx of calcium ions and resulting in intracellular calcium overload, ultimately leading to cell death [33].
In addition, other cells in the brain also participate in the excitotoxic process. Glutamate receptors on endothelial cells are continuously activated, leading to a large influx of calcium ions into the endothelial cells. This, in turn, disrupts mitochondrial function, generates reactive oxygen species, and damages cell metabolism, ultimately disrupting the integrity of the blood–brain barrier and causing neurotoxic damage [34,35]. Glutamate transporters on astrocytes transport a large amount of extracellular glutamate into astrocytes, where it is converted into glutamine by glutamine synthetase and then recycled into presynaptic neurons. Glutamate transporters are energy-dependent and transport glutamate along the sodium ion concentration gradient. During ischemia and hypoxia, energy supply is blocked, and coupled with strong depolarization, intracellular sodium ion concentration rises sharply, leading to the reverse transport of glutamate from the intracellular to the extracellular along the sodium ion concentration gradient, resulting in a large accumulation of glutamate and exacerbating excitotoxicity [36,37,38]. Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion can activate microglia, which transport cysteine into the cells through the xc− antiporter and simultaneously transport glutamate out of the cells in a 1:1 ratio. Moreover, activated microglia also release relevant factors that impair the function of excitatory amino acid transporters in other cells, further aggravating the accumulation of extracellular glutamate and excitotoxic damage [39] (Table 1).
Table 1.
Mechanisms of excitotoxicity induced by chronic cerebral hypoperfusion.
| Cell/Structure Involved | Main Mechanism | Outcome/Effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Presynaptic neuron | Ischemia/hypoxia → sustained glutamate release | Overactivation of postsynaptic NMDAR and other receptors → massive Ca2+ influx → calcium overload → neuronal death | [31] |
| Postsynaptic neuron | Overactivation of NMDAR and other excitatory amino acid receptors | Massive Ca2+ influx → calcium overload → neuronal death | [31] |
| Endothelial cell | Sustained activation of glutamate receptors → massive Ca2+ entry into endothelial cells | Mitochondrial dysfunction, ROS generation, metabolic damage → disruption of blood–brain barrier integrity → neurotoxic injury | [32,33] |
| Astrocyte | Glutamate transporters (energy-dependent, Na+ gradient-driven) take up extracellular glutamate and convert it to glutamine for recycling | Ischemia/hypoxia → energy deficit + increased intracellular Na+ → reverse transport of glutamate to extracellular space → glutamate accumulation → exacerbation of excitotoxicity | [34,35,36] |
| Microglia | Activated microglia import cystine and export glutamate via system xc−; release factors impair glutamate transporter function in other cells | Further extracellular glutamate accumulation → aggravated excitotoxic damage | [37] |
2.2.2. Oxidative Stress
Oxidative stress is the core mechanism underlying the occurrence and development of vascular dementia. It does not act independently but is intertwined with inflammatory reactions, mitochondrial damage, and ferroptosis, forming a complex network that leads to nervous system damage. Oxidative stress refers to a pathological state in which the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) in the body exceeds the endogenous antioxidant defense capacity, resulting in oxidative damage to cellular structures such as lipids, proteins, and DNA. ROS include superoxide anion (O2−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical (·OH), etc. Under normal physiological conditions, ROS participates in cell signaling, but excessive amounts trigger toxic reactions [40,41,42,43].
Cerebral ischemia–reperfusion injury explosively produces ROS through pathways such as mitochondrial electron transport chain leakage [44,45,46]. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase (NOX) on the cell membrane is another important source of ROS [47,48,49]. Cyclooxygenase (COX) can increase the production of ROS in endothelial cells through inflammatory reactions [50]. These three are the main sources of oxidative stress in the vascular system [51]. In addition, after chronic cerebral ischemia, heme decomposition releases free iron, which generates highly toxic hydroxyl radicals (·OH) through the Fenton reaction (Fe2+ + H2O2 → Fe3+ + ·OH + OH−) [52]. The decrease in the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx), as well as the imbalance of the antioxidant system caused by glutathione (GSH) depletion, will aggravate the excessive accumulation of ROS [53,54,55]. These are the mechanisms underlying the generation of oxidative stress in vascular dementia.
The role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of vascular dementia is promoted through multiple pathways in a synergistic manner. ROS inhibits the bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO), leading to vascular dilation disorders and abnormal cerebral blood flow regulation [56,57]. ROS activates matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), disrupts the basement membrane of cerebral vascular endothelial cells, and leads to blood–brain barrier leakage [58]. Oxidation causes lipid peroxidation, protein carbonylation, and DNA fragmentation, induces mitochondrial apoptosis pathways, and results in neuronal death or synaptic dysfunction [42,59,60,61]. ROS attacks oligodendrocytes, leading to demyelination, white matter damage, decreased cognitive conduction velocity, and impaired executive function [62]. ROS continuously activates microglia to release pro-inflammatory cytokines, forming a positive feedback loop of “oxidation-inflammation” and damaging neurons [63].
Oxidative stress is both an initiator and an amplifier in the pathogenesis of vascular dementia, driving cognitive decline through multiple dimensions such as direct damage to blood vessels, neurons, and neuroglial cells, exacerbating inflammation, and disrupting the blood–brain barrier.
2.2.3. Neuroinflammation
Neuroinflammation plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of vascular dementia. Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion not only directly induces energy metabolism disorders and ischemic injury but also activates the innate immune response and initiates a neuroinflammatory cascade by inducing hypoxia and stress signals [64,65]. Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) are core regulators of hypoxic adaptation. In myeloid cells (such as macrophages or neutrophils), HIFs not only regulate glycolysis and innate immunity but also directly promote the expression of pro-inflammatory genes and cell migration, amplifying the inflammatory response [66]. Furthermore, the disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) caused by chronic cerebral hypoperfusion allows peripheral immune cells (such as monocytes, T cells) to infiltrate the brain parenchyma, further exacerbating local inflammation [67].
In the inflammatory microenvironment induced by chronic cerebral hypoperfusion, pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin-1β (IL-1β), as well as chemokines such as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), are key effector molecules. IL-6 exacerbates vascular damage by promoting the formation of atherosclerotic plaques and inducing the expression of endothelial cell adhesion molecules such as intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). Additionally, IL-6 can activate microglia and promote the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, forming a vicious cycle of “inflammation-vascular damage” [68]. Patients with vascular dementia exhibit elevated levels of TNF-α in both blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which is positively correlated with the severity of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) [69]. TNF-α induces the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) by activating the NF-κB pathway, increasing the production of nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and directly leading to oxidative damage to neurons [70]. IL-6 and TNF-α can also damage vascular endothelial cells and reduce the expression of claudin-5, a tight junction protein of the BBB, leading to plasma protein leakage, inducing brain edema and white matter ischemia [69,71]. After chronic cerebral hypoperfusion, the expression of MCP-1 in vascular endothelial cells is upregulated, recruiting peripheral monocytes to infiltrate the brain parenchyma through C-C chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2), differentiate into pro-inflammatory macrophages, and release ROS and proteases such as matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), thereby damaging the blood–brain barrier (BBB) [72].
The complement system, as a core component of innate immunity, interacts with the coagulation system in vascular dementia, exacerbating inflammatory damage [73]. Studies have found that in chronic cerebral hypoperfusion models, the deposition of C5 complement protein in the white matter region of the corpus callosum significantly increases, consistent with the temporal progression of white matter damage. C5-deficient mice exhibit significantly reduced white matter ischemic damage and reactive glial cell proliferation, suggesting that C5 modulates the activation of the NLR family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, thereby promoting the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, mediating white matter damage [74,75]. Furthermore, the synergistic action of complement and coagulation factors can enhance the permeability of endothelial cells, further damaging the integrity of the BBB [73].
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), especially MMP-3 and MMP-9, play a dual role in vascular remodeling, but their abnormal activation in vascular dementia can damage the BBB and lead to myelin damage. In the brain tissue of patients with Binswanger disease (a specific subtype of VaD), MMP-3 is continuously expressed in areas infiltrated by microglia/macrophages, suggesting its involvement in white matter demyelination and axonal degeneration processes. MMPs promote inflammatory cell infiltration by degrading the extracellular matrix and form a positive feedback loop with pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, accelerating the progression of VaD [76]. Additionally, MMPs inhibit myelin regeneration by degrading the oligodendrocyte precursor cell survival factor, platelet-derived growth factor [77].
Microglia, the innate immune cells in the brain, exhibit biphasic functions in VaD. Early activation allows them to clear necrotic debris, but sustained activation shifts to a pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype, releasing toxic molecules such as IL-6, TNF-α, and iNOS, exacerbating white matter damage [78]. Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion can activate NLRP3 and melanoma differentiation-associated protein 2 (AIM2), triggering cysteinyl aspartate specific proteinase-1 (caspase-1)-dependent maturation and release of IL-1β, inducing microglia polarization to the M1 phenotype, promoting the generation of ROS and NO, and directly damaging oligodendrocytes and neurons; meanwhile, IL-1β can also enhance the expression of adhesion molecules on endothelial cells, recruit more immune cells for infiltration, and form a vicious cycle of “inflammasome-pro-inflammatory cytokines-cell infiltration” [79]. Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion can activate microglia through the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) pathway, enhancing the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and leading to damage to white matter and hippocampal neurons [80,81]. Furthermore, microglia can secrete MMP-9 to directly degrade myelin basic protein (MBP), resulting in demyelination and further disruption of neural conduction [76].
In summary, inflammation is a key link in the pathogenesis of VaD, permeating the entire process of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion, white matter damage, and neuronal loss, involving multidimensional regulation by pro-inflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules, complement, matrix metalloproteinases, inflammasomes, and microglia.
2.2.4. BBB Disruption
The blood–brain barrier (BBB), as a crucial interface between the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral circulation, plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of vascular dementia (VaD) by regulating substance exchange and maintaining brain homeostasis. Studies have shown that BBB disruption is not only a pathological feature of VaD but also a factor contributing to disease progression. The BBB is composed of brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs), astrocyte end feet, pericytes, and the basement membrane (BM) [82]. Its core functions include: strictly restricting harmful substances such as pathogens, toxins, and large molecular proteins from entering the brain parenchyma; regulating the exchange of nutrients and metabolic waste through transportation mediated by glucose transporters (GLUT) and receptors such as low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1); maintaining the stability of ions and neurotransmitters within the brain [83].
Unlike peripheral vascular endothelial cells, BMECs exhibit three unique characteristics: they express tight junction proteins (TJs), such as claudin-5, occludin, and zona occludens-1 (ZO-1), to seal the paracellular pathway; they lack fenestrations and have extremely low pinocytosis; and they highly express efflux transporters to prevent exogenous substances from entering the brain [58]. Pericytes, embedded between BMECs and astrocyte end feet, which regulate BBB-specific gene expression in BMECs and induce polarization of astrocyte end-feet, are key cells in the formation and stability of the BBB [84]. Astrocyte end feet encase blood vessels and maintain BBB integrity by secreting paracrine factors such as laminin [85].
Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion or ischemic reperfusion injury can lead to BBB cell damage or pro-inflammatory changes, subsequently causing BBB disruption. In patients with VaD and animal models, BMECs exhibit reduced mitochondrial content, increased pinocytic vesicles, and downregulated GLUT1 expression, leading to insufficient brain energy supply [86]. A significant decrease in the number of pericytes results in loss of vascular stability [84,87]. Pericyte degeneration can also induce white matter microcirculation disorders, manifested as fibrinogen deposition, reduced blood flow, and myelin loss [84]. The level of the soluble marker platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ), reflecting pericyte damage, is directly correlated with cognitive impairment [88]. Astrocytes are activated, leading to reduced vascular coverage, upregulation of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and downregulation of aquaporin 4 (AQP4), which damages the clearance ability of cerebral interstitial fluid [89]. The level of lipocalin-2 (LCN2) secreted by reactive astrocytes increases significantly, mediating the death of hippocampal neurons [90].
The disruption of the BBB and cognitive impairment in vascular dementia (VaD) form a “vicious cycle”: increased BBB permeability leads to the entry of blood-borne toxins into the brain parenchyma, activating glial cells and neurons, triggering oxidative stress and cell death; neuronal death further weakens brain metabolic demand, leading to abnormal regulation of cerebral blood flow and exacerbating cerebral hypoperfusion; cerebral hypoperfusion, in turn, intensifies BBB disruption, forming a positive feedback loop [91]. In summary, BBB disruption is an important link in the pathogenesis of VaD, involving multiple pathways such as BBB cell damage or inflammatory changes, oxidative stress, and toxic factor mediation (Table 2).
Table 2.
The role of BBB in the pathogenesis of VaD.
| Components | Normal Structure & Function | Pathological Changes in VaD | Main Consequences | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBB as a whole | Composed of brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs), astrocyte endfeet, pericytes, and basement membrane (BM); strictly restricts harmful substances from entering the brain parenchyma; regulates exchange of nutrients and metabolic waste; maintains ion and neurotransmitter homeostasis | Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion/ischemia–reperfusion injury → BBB cellular injury or pro-inflammatory changes → BBB disruption | Increased BBB permeability → blood-derived toxins enter brain → activation of glia and neurons → oxidative stress and cell death → cognitive impairment; forms a “vicious cycle” | [80,81,89] |
| BMECs | Express tight junction proteins (claudin-5, occludin, ZO-1) sealing paracellular pathways; lack fenestrations and have very low pinocytosis; highly express efflux transporters; contain GLUT1 and other active transporters | mitochondrial content ↓, pinocytotic vesicles ↑, GLUT1 expression ↓ | Insufficient cerebral energy supply | [56,84] |
| Pericytes | Embedded between BMECs and astrocytes; regulate endothelial function via “peg-socket” contacts; key for BBB formation and stability | Significant ↓ in number; loss of vascular stability; white matter microcirculatory dysfunction (fibrinogen deposition, ↓ blood flow, myelin loss); soluble marker PDGFRβ ↑ | Cognitive impairment and white matter damage | [82,85,86] |
| Astrocyte endfeet | Wrap around vessels; secrete laminin and other paracrine factors to maintain BBB integrity; participate in interstitial fluid clearance (via AQP4) | Activation → ↓ vascular coverage; ↑ GFAP, ↓ AQP4; impaired clearance capacity; ↑ LCN2 | Hippocampal neuronal death; exacerbation of neuroinflammation and metabolic disturbance | [83,87,88] |
↑ indicates increase; ↓ indicates decrease.
In summary, the core pathogenesis of VaD includes excitotoxicity, oxidative stress injury, neuroinflammation, and BBB disruption. In the treatment of VaD, traditional studies have mainly focused on the association between vascular damage and neurodegeneration. The effectiveness of drugs developed based on this is limited, and thus the role of epigenetic regulation and transcriptional factors has gradually gained attention. E2F1 is one of the members of the E2F family. As a core transcription factor for cell cycle regulation, it mainly regulates the transition from the G1 phase to S phase of cells and is also involved in biological processes such as DNA damage repair and apoptosis [92]. Recent studies have found that E2F1 exacerbates nerve damage through multiple pathways and participates in the nerve-damage process of VaD by regulating cell apoptosis, autophagy, inflammatory response, oxidative stress, and angiogenesis, and is expected to become a potential pharmacological therapeutic target.
3. Characteristics of E2F1
The adenovirus E2 promoter binding factor (E2F) [93,94], a transcription factor family encoded by eight genes and containing eight subtypes (E2F1-8), is regulated by alternative splicing or different transcription start points, resulting in protein isoforms that share a common DNA-binding domain [95,96,97,98,99]. Among them, E2F1 is the earliest discovered E2F transcription factor, regulating the expression of cell cycle-related genes including DNA repair [100,101,102,103,104,105], cell proliferation, and apoptosis [106,107]. Therefore, it is one of the most important proteins for cells [108,109,110]. The regulatory process of E2F1 on the expression of various proteins occurs in the cell nucleus [110]; however, in the cytoplasm, E2F1 can interact directly with mitochondria in a non-transcriptional manner [111,112,113]. E2F1 needs to bind to dimerization proteins (DP) or retinoblastoma proteins (pRB) [114] to exert activity in the promoter region of genes. The binding of E2F1 to pRB inhibits the formation of the E2F1-DP complex, blocks the recruitment of transcriptional coactivators to the gene promoter region, and affects the expression of cell cycle-related proteins [115]. When pRB is phosphorylated by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), E2F1 is released and can promote the expression of cell cycle-related genes [116,117,118,119]. Genome-wide localization studies have shown that, in addition to its key role in cell cycle regulation, E2F1 also regulates numerous cellular pathways by binding to hundreds of gene promoter regions [120,121,122,123]. E2F1 is a transcription factor that plays a crucial role in cell fate and is capable of regulating gene expression related to DNA replication, DNA damage repair, cell cycle, and programmed cell death [124,125].
4. Expression of E2F1 in the Cell Cycle
E2F1 is involved in regulating the expression of cell cycle-related genes [126]. The E2F1 gene is induced to express in the late G1 phase, activating the inhibitory factors in the E2F family during the S phase. As the level of inhibitory factors increases, the transcription of E2F1 is inhibited, and the E2F program in the G2 phase is shut down [127,128,129,130,131]. E2F1 can undergo post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, methylation, ubiquitination, and acetylation to recognize and bind regulatory elements, influencing RNA polymerase recognition and binding to promoters, thus regulating transcription [132,133,134,135,136]. The degradation of E2F1 is associated with the ubiquitin ligase late-stage promoting complex (APC/C) and is considered to be an APC/C-dependent ubiquitin-targeted process [137,138]. The expression of E2F1-driven APC/C inhibitors inhibits the activity of APC/C. By late S phase, E2F7 or E2F8 inhibits the expression of APC/C inhibitors, and E2F1 binds to APC/C and is degraded [139,140]. However, recent studies have suggested that members of the F-box protein family, such as cyclin F (CCNF), promote the degradation of E2F1 at the S post-midpoint stage in order to prevent the initiation of inappropriate DNA replication programs and to avoid disrupting the normal cell cycle progression [141].
5. E2F1 and Apoptosis
E2F1 promotes cell apoptosis in two ways. Firstly, in a P53-dependent manner, E2F1 can activate the transcription of p14ARF, an inhibitor of mouse double microbody gene 2 protein (MDM2), which in turn inhibits the pro-apoptotic function of P53 [142,143]. E2F1 can also promote the transcription of genes such as ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), which activates P53 through phosphorylation [144,145,146,147]. Additionally, E2F1 can activate the transcription of P53 co-activators such as P53 apoptosis-stimulating protein 1 (ASPP1), P53 apoptosis-stimulating protein 2 (ASPP2), and tumor protein P53-induced nuclear protein 1 (TP53INP1), thereby enabling P53 to exert its pro-apoptotic function [148,149,150,151]. Secondly, in a P53-independent manner, E2F1 can directly activate the transcription of genes such as p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA), Bcl-2 interacting mediator of cell death (BIM), phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-induced protein 1 (NOXA), apoptotic protease activating factor 1 (APAF-1), cysteinyl aspartate specific proteinase-3, -7, -8 and -9 (caspase-3, -7, -8 and -9), thereby exerting a pro-apoptotic effect [152,153,154,155,156]. E2F1 can also activate the transcription of P73 [157], and P73 can activate the Bcl-2-associated X protein (BAX), exerting a pro-apoptotic effect [158]. P73 can also activate the GRAM domain-containing protein 4 (GRAMD4), which is located on the mitochondria and can inhibit B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) on its membrane, thereby exerting a pro-apoptotic effect [159]. Furthermore, when DNA damage occurs and nucleolar stress is induced, p14ARF in the nucleolus transfers to the nucleoplasm, recruiting E2F1 from the nucleoplasm to the nucleolus [160,161]. Ribosomal RNA processing protein 1 homolog B (RRP1B) in the nucleolus binds to the DNA-binding domain of E2F1, enhancing the transcription of pro-apoptotic genes such as caspase-3 and -7 [162] (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
E2F1 and apoptosis. By Figdraw. It was proposed that E2F1 promotes apoptosis in two ways: P53-dependent and P53-independent. The signaling pathways by which E2F1 regulates apoptosis were introduced in the two methods.
represents direct enhancement,
represents direct inhibition, and
represents indirect enhancement. ASPP1, ASPP2, and TP53INP1 are tran-scriptional co-activators that bind to P53 and enhance its transcriptional function.
6. The Role of E2F1 in Neurodegenerative Diseases
When cell cycle progression is disrupted or arrested, E2F1 can drive the apoptosis response of neurons [163]. E2F1 is highly expressed in the hippocampal tissue of AD model rats [164], and its high expression is a major factor contributing to cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury [165], indicating that E2F1 is a risk factor for dementia. Furthermore, it has been reported that E2F1 participates in regulating apoptosis events induced by oxidative stress [166], and downregulation of E2F1 can inhibit cell pyroptosis caused by oxidative stress [167]. Moreover, knockdown of E2F1 can reduce ROS levels and mitigate mitochondrial autophagy damage by inhibiting triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (TREM1), and silencing E2F1 can effectively reduce mitochondrial damage and improve neurological function in mice with cerebral ischemia–reperfusion injury [168]. In addition, E2F1 can activate the Cbp/p300-interacting transactivator, with Glu/Asp-rich carboxy-terminal domain 2 (Cited2), and promote neuronal cell death [169], and AD pathogenic protein Aβ can induce neuronal death by upregulating E2F1 [170]. This suggests that E2F1 may damage neurons and trigger dementia by inducing oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
E2F1 in neurodegenerative disease. By Figdraw. Aβ and cerebral ischemia induce an upregulation of E2F1 levels, leading to a series of events such as oxidative stress, pyroptosis, mitophagy, activation of death genes like Cited2, cell cycle reset, apoptosis, and ultimately triggering VaD.
7. The Role of E2F1 in Ischemic Brain Injury
Within the penumbra region caused by photothrombotic stroke (PTS), the levels of E2F1 and p53 are significantly elevated [171]. This phenomenon aligns with the roles of E2F1 [172] and p53 [173] in the tissue response of the penumbra after transient ischemic stroke in rats. Blocking the E2F1/p53 signaling axis can inhibit the process of neuronal apoptosis [174]. On the other hand, E2F1 can exacerbate oxidative stress-triggered apoptosis through Apoptosis Signal-regulating Kinase 1 (ASK1)/c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) cascade [175,176]. As a crucial driver of stress-induced apoptosis, JNK shows an elevated trend in the penumbra region caused by PTS [171] and can enhance the pro-apoptotic effect of p53 [177]. Furthermore, p38MAPK, which is involved in regulating the expression of E2F1 and p53, is also upregulated in the penumbra region after PTS. Its role in enhancing E2F1 expression may be achieved through mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2 (MAPKAPK2) [178,179], which also exhibits a high expression level in this region. This suggests that E2F1 is closely related to the mechanism of ischemic brain tissue damage. Therefore, it is inferred that E2F1 can be further studied as a key regulatory molecule for vascular dementia.
8. Involvement of E2F1 in the Pathogenesis of VaD
E2F1 regulates neuronal apoptosis: E2F1 can promote the transcription of PUMA and NOXA, the initiators of the apoptotic process, further activating the downstream BAX and activating Caspase-3, thereby promoting the process of apoptosis [180,181]. E2F1 disrupts autophagic homeostasis and exacerbates neural damage: Under conditions of oxidative stress or nutrient deficiency, E2F1 promotes the expression of microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) and Beclin-1, regulating autophagy in cells [182]. The activation of E2F1 also upregulates the expression of autophagy-related gene-1 (ATG1), ATG5, and damage-regulated autophagy modulator (DRAM), enhancing autophagy [183]. E2F1 activates neuroinflammation: E2F1 upregulates the expression of NLRP3, apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD (ASC), and caspase-1, promoting the assembly of NLRP3 inflammasomes and the maturation and release of IL-1β [184]. E2F1 can also promote the generation of NLRP3 inflammasomes by activating the NF-κB pathway [185]. Additionally, E2F1 can promote the generation of NLRP3 by targeting the transcription of its subunit, macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) [186]. E2F1 regulates oxidative stress damage: One binding site of E2F1 can bind to the promoter of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase 4 (NOX4), promoting the transcription of NOX4 and the production of downstream ROS [187], indicating that E2F1 is involved in the mechanism of oxidative stress damage. E2F1 inhibits angiogenesis and collateral circulation compensation: Moderate angiogenesis can increase blood flow supply to ischemic areas and improve the prognosis of VaD. However, studies [188] have shown that E2F1 competitively binds to the specificity protein 1 (Sp1) binding site on the promoter of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), inhibiting its transcription and angiogenesis. In conclusion, E2F1 plays a regulatory role in the core pathogenesis of VaD, providing a fundamental basis for further research on E2F1 as a pharmacological therapeutic target for VaD (Figure 3).
Figure 3.
Involvement of E2F1 in the pathogenesis of VaD. By Figdraw. The signal pathways involved in the regulation of E2F1 in five aspects, namely promoting apoptosis, interfering with autophagy, acti-vating inflammation, regulating oxidative stress and inhibiting angiogenesis, were proposed, in-dicating the specific mechanism by which E2F1 is involved in the neural injury process of VaD.
represents enhancement,
represents inhibition.
9. Conclusions and Prospects
This article provides a comprehensive review of the current research status of vascular dementia. As effective drugs for vascular dementia have not yet been developed, the discussion on drug aspects is not included in this review. Instead, this article mainly focuses on the pathogenesis of vascular dementia, aiming to identify potential molecules that may play a regulatory role in the mechanism, thereby providing a direction for finding new pharmacological therapeutic targets. The role of transcription factor E2F1 in the cell cycle, especially in apoptosis, has caught our attention. Simultaneously, we have found that E2F1 has a certain regulatory effect on the occurrence and progression of neurodegenerative diseases and ischemic brain diseases, suggesting that E2F1 is likely to play a regulatory role in the occurrence and development of vascular dementia. Further research has revealed that E2F1 participates in the neural injury process of VaD by promoting apoptosis, interfering with autophagy, activating inflammation, regulating oxidative stress and inhibiting angiogenesis, and is a key regulatory molecule for VaD. It is worth noting that this study is at an early stage of pharmacological therapeutic target research, and the conclusions are based on animal or cell models of VaD. The purpose is to provide a promising exploration direction for the development of pharmacological therapeutic targets for VaD.
Future research can further explore E2F1 as a pharmacological therapeutic target for VaD, mainly considering its safety and efficacy. For instance, how to specifically reduce the overexpressed E2F1 in the brain tissue cells of VaD, and how to act on E2F1 in VaD brain tissue through a specific delivery system without being restricted by the BBB, etc. It is gratifying that scientists have developed albumin nanoparticles as a novel delivery system, which can be directly injected into the marrow cavity of the skull through a minimally invasive approach and migrate along the cranial-meningeal microchannels to the central nervous system, reaching the lesion sites in the brain tissue. The results of the first application of this drug delivery technology in humans show that patients with cerebral infarction perform well in terms of postoperative tolerance, safety, and neurological function recovery, providing a preliminary basis for the clinical transformation of this strategy [189]. The successful application of this delivery system brings hope for achieving targeted regulation of E2F1 in VaD brain tissue. Although there is still a large amount of research work to be explored, E2F1 becoming a pharmacological therapeutic target for VaD is a very promising exploration direction of great significance for the development of VaD disease treatment.
Acknowledgments
During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used [DeepSeek1.6.11 and Figdraw2.0] for the purposes of polishing the text and figures. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.
Author Contributions
Investigation, Z.H.; resources, M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, F.Z.; writing—review and editing, F.Z.; visualization, Z.Z.; supervision, W.L.; project administration, J.C.; funding acquisition, J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the National Nature Science Foundation of China, Grant No. 82274395.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Román G.C. Vascular dementia revisited: Diagnosis, pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2002;86:477–499. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(02)00008-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stebbins G.T., Nyenhuis D.L., Wang C., Cox J.L., Freels S., Bangen K., de Toledo-Morrell L., Sripathirathan K., Moseley M., Turner D.A., et al. Gray matter atrophy in patients with ischemic stroke with cognitive impairment. Stroke. 2008;39:785–793. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.507392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Habeych M.E., Castilla-Puentes R. Comorbid medical conditions in vascular dementia: A matched case-control study. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 2015;203:604–608. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Javanshiri K., Waldö M.L., Friberg N., Sjövall F., Wickerström K., Haglund M., Englund E. Atherosclerosis, hypertension, and diabetes in Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia, and mixed dementia: Prevalence and presentation. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2018;65:1247–1258. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180644. Erratum in J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2018, 66, 1753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Akhter F., Persaud A., Zaokari Y., Zhao Z., Zhu D. Vascular dementia and underlying sex differences. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:720715. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.720715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sekiya H., Matsubara T., DeTure M.A., Dickson D.W. Neuropathology of Lewy body dementia: Lewy-related pathology, α-synuclein oligomers, and comorbid pathologies. Mol. Neurodegener. 2025;20:117. doi: 10.1186/s13024-025-00900-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liang C.S., Li D.J., Yang F.C., Tseng P.T., Carvalho A.F., Stubbs B., Thompson T., Mueller C., Shin J.I., Radua J., et al. Mortality rates in Alzheimer’s disease and non-Alzheimer’s dementias: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021;2:e479–e488. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00140-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dai J., Chan D.K.Y., Chan R.O., Hirani V., Xu Y.H., Braidy N. The association between dietary patterns, plasma lipid profiles, and inflammatory potential in a vascular dementia cohort. Aging Med. 2023;6:155–162. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Albanese E., Launer L., Egger M., Prince M.J., Giannakopoulos P., Wolters F.J., Egan K. Body mass index in midlife and dementia: Systematic review and meta-regression analysis of 589,649 men and women followed in longitudinal studies. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2017;8:165–178. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2017.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Webb A.J.S., Werring D.J. New insights into cerebrovascular pathophysiology and hypertension. Stroke. 2022;53:1054–1064. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Iwagami M., Qizibash N., Gregson J., Douglas I., Johnson M., Pearce N., Evans S., Pocock S. Blood cholesterol and risk of dementia in more than 1.8 million people over two decades: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021;2:e498–e506. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00150-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jeon K.H., Han K., Jeong S.M., Park J., Yoo J.E., Yoo J., Lee J., Kim S.Y., Shin D.W. Changes in alcohol consumption and risk of dementia in a nationwide cohort in South Korea. JAMA Netw. Open. 2023;6:e2254771. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gudala K., Bansal D., Schifano F., Bhansali A. Diabetes mellitus and risk of dementia: A meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. J. Diabetes Investig. 2013;4:640–650. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Choi D., Choi S., Park S.M. Effect of smoking cessation on the risk of dementia: A longitudinal study. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2018;5:1192–1199. doi: 10.1002/acn3.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hansson O., Svensson M., Gustavsson A.M., Andersson E., Yang Y.Y., Nägga K., Hållmarker U., James S., Deierborg T. Midlife physical activity is associated with lower incidence of vascular dementia but not Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 2019;11:87. doi: 10.1186/s13195-019-0538-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Skrobot O.A., Black S.E., Chen C., de Carli C., Erkinjuntti T., Ford G.A., Kalaria R.N., O’Brien J., Pantoni L., Pasquier F., et al. Progress toward standardized diagnosis of vascular cognitive impairment: Guidelines from the Vascular Impairment of Cognition Classification Consensus Study. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2018;14:280–292. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Prajjwal P., Marsool M.D.M., Inban P., Sharma B., Asharaf S., Aleti S., Gadam S., Al Sakini A.S., Hadi D.D. Vascular dementia subtypes, pathophysiology, genetics, neuroimaging, biomarkers, and treatment updates along with its association with Alzheimer’s dementia and diabetes mellitus. Dis. Mon. 2023;69:101557. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2023.101557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kavirajan H., Schneider L.S. Efficacy and adverse effects of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in vascular dementia: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:782–792. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70195-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Iadecola C., Duering M., Hachinski V., Joutel A., Pendlebury S.T., Schneider J.A., Dichgans M. Vascular cognitive impairment and dementia: JACC scientific expert panel. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019;73:3326–3344. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jellinger K.A. Pathology and pathogenesis of vascular cognitive impairment-a critical update. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2013;5:17. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2013.00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yang T., Sun Y., Lu Z., Leak R.K., Zhang F. The impact of cerebrovascular aging on vascular cognitive impairment and dementia. Ageing Res. Rev. 2017;34:15–29. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2016.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Iadecola C. The neurovascular unit coming of age: A journey through neurovascular coupling in health and disease. Neuron. 2017;96:17–42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.07.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shih A.Y., Blinder P., Tsai P.S., Friedman B., Stanley G., Lyden P.D., Kleinfeld D. The smallest stroke: Occlusion of one penetrating vessel leads to infarction and a cognitive deficit. Nat. Neurosci. 2013;16:55–63. doi: 10.1038/nn.3278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sun B.L., Wang L.H., Yang T., Sun J.Y., Mao L.L., Yang M.F., Yuan H., Colvin R.A., Yang X.Y. Lymphatic drainage system of the brain: A novel target for intervention of neurological diseases. Prog. Neurobiol. 2018;163–164:118–143. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hannocks M.J., Pizzo M.E., Huppert J., Deshpande T., Abbott N.J., Thorne R.G., Sorokin L. Molecular characterization of perivascular drainage pathways in the murine brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2018;38:669–686. doi: 10.1177/0271678X17749689. Erratum in J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2018, 38, 1384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bedussi B., Almasian M., de Vos J., VanBavel E., Bakker E.N. Paravascular spaces at the brain surface: Low resistance pathways for cerebrospinal fluid flow. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2018;38:719–726. doi: 10.1177/0271678X17737984. Erratum in J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2018, 38, 746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen W., Song X., Zhang Y., Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Assessment of the Virchow-Robin spaces in Alzheimer disease, mild cognitive impairment, and normal aging, using high-field MR imaging. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2011;32:1490–1495. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Potter G.M., Doubal F.N., Jackson C.A., Chappell F.M., Sudlow C.L., Dennis M.S., Wardlaw J.M. Enlarged perivascular spaces and cerebral small vessel disease. Int. J. Stroke. 2015;10:376–381. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhu Y.C., Dufouil C., Mazoyer B., Soumaré A., Ricolfi F., Tzourio C., Chabriat H. Frequency and location of dilated Virchow-Robin spaces in elderly people: A population-based 3D MR imaging study. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2011;32:709–713. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dong X.X., Wang Y., Qin Z.H. Molecular mechanisms of excitotoxicity and their relevance to pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2009;30:379–387. doi: 10.1038/aps.2009.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ganzella M., de Oliveira E.D., Comassetto D.D., Cechetti F., Cereser V.H., Jr., Moreira J.D., Hansel G., Almeida R.F., Ramos D.B., Figueredo Y.N., et al. Effects of chronic guanosine treatment on hippocampal damage and cognitive impairment of rats submitted to chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. Neurol. Sci. 2012;33:985–997. doi: 10.1007/s10072-011-0872-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Marosi M., Fuzik J., Nagy D., Rákos G., Kis Z., Vécsei L., Toldi J., Ruban-Matuzani A., Teichberg V.I., Farkas T. Oxaloacetate restores the long-term potentiation impaired in rat hippocampus CA1 region by 2-vessel occlusion. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2009;604:51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Daniele S.G., Trummer G., Hossmann K.A., Vrselja Z., Benk C., Gobeske K.T., Damjanovic D., Andrijevic D., Pooth J.S., Dellal D., et al. Brain vulnerability and viability after ischaemia. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2021;22:553–572. doi: 10.1038/s41583-021-00488-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.András I.E., Deli M.A., Veszelka S., Hayashi K., Hennig B., Toborek M. The NMDA and AMPA/KA receptors are involved in glutamate-induced alterations of occludin expression and phosphorylation in brain endothelial cells. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:1431–1443. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Collard C.D., Park K.A., Montalto M.C., Alapati S., Buras J.A., Stahl G.L., Colgan S.P. Neutrophil-derived glutamate regulates vascular endothelial barrier function. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:14801–14811. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m110557200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rappeneau V., Blaker A., Petro J.R., Yamamoto B.K., Shimamoto A. Disruption of the glutamate-glutamine cycle involving astrocytes in an animal model of depression for males and females. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2016;10:231. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Martinez-Lozada Z., Guillem A.M., Robinson M.B. Transcriptional regulation of glutamate transporters: From extracellular signals to transcription factors. Adv. Pharmacol. 2016;76:103–145. doi: 10.1016/bs.apha.2016.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yu D., Cheng Z., Ali A.I., Wang J., Le K., Chibaatar E., Guo Y. Down-expressed GLT-1 in PSD astrocytes inhibits synaptic formation of NSC-derived neurons in vitro. Cell Cycle. 2019;18:105–114. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2018.1560201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Domercq M., Sánchez-Gómez M.V., Sherwin C., Etxebarria E., Fern R., Matute C. System xc- and glutamate transporter inhibition mediates microglial toxicity to oligodendrocytes. J. Immunol. 2007;178:6549–6556. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.10.6549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chen R., Lai U.H., Zhu L., Singh A., Ahmed M., Forsyth N.R. Reactive oxygen species formation in the brain at different oxygen levels: The role of hypoxia inducible factors. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018;6:132. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2018.00132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhao H., Zhang R., Yan X., Fan K. Superoxide dismutase nanozymes: An emerging star for anti-oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2021;9:6939–6957. doi: 10.1039/D1TB00720C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bruce A.J., Boling W., Kindy M.S., Peschon J., Kraemer P.J., Carpenter M.K., Holtsberg F.W., Mattson M.P. Altered neuronal and microglial responses to excitotoxic and ischemic brain injury in mice lacking TNF receptors. Nat. Med. 1996;2:788–794. doi: 10.1038/nm0796-788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Trujillo-Rangei W.Á., García-Valdés L., Villar M.M.D., Castañeda-Arellano R., Totsuka-Sutto S.E., García-Benavides L. Therapeutic targets for regulating oxidative damage induced by ischemia-reperfusion injury: A study from a pharmacological perspective. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2022;2022:8624318. doi: 10.1155/2022/8624318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Han B., Jiang W., Liu H., Wang J., Zheng K., Cui P., Feng Y., Dang C., Bu Y., Wang Q.M., et al. Upregulation of neuronal PGC-1αameliorates cognitive impairment induced by chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. Theranostics. 2020;10:2832–2848. doi: 10.7150/thno.37119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wheaton W.W., Chandel N.S. Hypoxia. 2. Hypoxia regulates cellular metabolism. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2011;300:C385–C393. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00485.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Li W.J., Yang S.H. Targeting oxidative stress for the treatment of ischemic stroke: Upstream and downstream therapeutic strategies. Brain Circ. 2016;2:153–163. doi: 10.4103/2394-8108.195279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wu M.Y., Yiang G.T., Liao W.T., Tsai A.P., Cheng Y.Y., Cheng P.W., Li C.Y., Li C.J. Current mechanistic concepts in ischemia and reperfusion injury. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018;46:1650–1667. doi: 10.1159/000489241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Choi D.H., Lee J. A mini-review of the NADPH oxidases in vascular dementia: Correlation with NOXs and risk factors for VaD. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:2500. doi: 10.3390/ijms18112500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Choi D.H., Lee K.H., Kim J.H., Seo J.H., Kim H.Y., Shin C.Y., Han J.S., Han S.H., Kim Y.S., Lee J. NADPH oxidase 1, a novel molecular source of ROS in hippocampal neuronal death in vascular dementia. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2014;21:533–550. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.5129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wang F., Cao Y., Ma L., Pei H., Rausch W.D., Li H. Dysfunction of cerebrovascular endothelial cells: Prelude to vascular dementia. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:376. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lee M.Y., Griendling K.K. Redox signaling, vascular function, and hypertension. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2008;10:1045–1059. doi: 10.1089/ars.2007.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gao W.N., Li Z.X., Yang C.D., Lin Y., Wang L.J. Silencing of activating transcription factor 3 alleviates oxidative stress and inflammation and improves cognitive dysfunction in vascular dementia rats by repressing ferroptosis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2025;158:114730. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2025.114730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Suridjan I., Herrmann N., Adibfar A., Saleem M., Andreazza A., Oh P.I., Lanctôt K.L. Lipid peroxidation markers in coronary artery disease patients with possible vascular mild cognitive impairment. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017;58:885–896. doi: 10.3233/JAD-161248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sun A.Y., Chen Y.M. Oxidative stress and neurodegenerative disorders. J. Biomed. Sci. 1998;5:401–414. doi: 10.1007/BF02255928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chen J.J., Thiyagarajah M., Song J., Chen C., Herrmann N., Gallagher D., Rapoport M.J., Black S.E., Ramirez J., Andreazza A.C., et al. Altered central and blood glutathione in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 2022;14:23. doi: 10.1186/s13195-022-00961-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Förstermann U. Nitric oxide and oxidative stress in vascular disease. Pflugers Arch. 2010;459:923–939. doi: 10.1007/s00424-010-0808-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lourenço C.F., Ledo A., Barbosa R.M., Laranjinha J. Neurovascular-neuroenergetic coupling axis in the brain: Master regulation by nitric oxide and consequences in aging and neurodegeneration. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017;108:668–682. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ueno M., Chiba Y., Matsumoto K., Murakami R., Fujihara R., Kawauchi M., Miyanaka H., Nakagawa T. Blood-brain barrier damage in vascular dementia. Neuropathology. 2016;36:115–124. doi: 10.1111/neup.12262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wang J., Markesbery W.R., Lovell M.A. Increased oxidative damage in nuclear and mitochondrial DNA in mild cognitive impairment. J. Neurochem. 2006;96:825–832. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03615.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chen Q., Ding Q., Thorpe J., Dohmen R.J., Keller J.N. RNA interference toward UMP1 induces proteasome inhibition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Evidence for protein oxidation and autophagic cell death. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2005;38:226–234. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Christophe M., Nicolas S. Mitochondria: A target for neuroprotective interventions in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2006;12:739–757. doi: 10.2174/138161206775474242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wu W., Luo Z., Shen D., Lan T., Xiao Z., Liu M., Hu L., Sun T., Wang Y., Zhang J.N. IL-10 protects against OPC ferroptosis by regulating lipid reactive oxygen species levels post stroke. Redox Biol. 2024;69:102982. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2023.102982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhao Y., Zhang J.W., Zheng Y.L., Zhang Y.X., Zhang X.J., Wang H.M., Du Y., Guan J., Wang X.Z., Fu J.L. NAD+ improves cognitive function and reduces neuroinflammation by ameliorating mitochondrial damage and decreasing ROS production in chronic cerebral hypoperfusion models through Sirt1/PGC-1α pathway. J. Neuroinflamm. 2021;18:207. doi: 10.1186/s12974-021-02250-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Imtiyaz H.Z., Simon M.C. Hypoxia-inducible factors as essential regulators of inflammation. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2010;345:105–120. doi: 10.1007/82_2010_74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Taylor C.T., Doherty G., Fallon P.G., Cummins E.P. Hypoxia-dependent regulation of inflammatory pathways in immune cells. J. Clin. Investig. 2016;126:3716–3724. doi: 10.1172/JCI84433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Semenza G.L. Hypoxia-inducible factors in physiology and medicine. Cell. 2012;148:399–408. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ransohoff R.M., Engelhardt B. The anatomical and cellular basis of immune surveillance in the central nervous system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2012;12:623–635. doi: 10.1038/nri3265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hartman J., Frishman W.H. Inflammation and atherosclerosis: A review of the role of interleukin-6 in the development of atherosclerosis and the potential for targeted drug therapy. Cardiol. Rev. 2014;22:147–151. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Custodero C., Ciavarella A., Panza F., Gnocchi D., Lenato G.M., Lee J., Mazzocca A., Sabbà C., Solfrizzi V. Role of inflammatory markers in the diagnosis of vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. GeroScience. 2022;44:1373–1392. doi: 10.1007/s11357-022-00556-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Bal-Price A., Brown G.C. Inflammatory neurodegeneration mediated by nitric oxide from activated glia-inhibiting neuronal respiration, causing glutamate release and excitotoxicity. J. Neurosci. 2001;21:6480–6491. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-17-06480.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ungvari Z., Tarantini S., Donato A.J., Galvan V., Csiszar A. Mechanisms of vascular aging. Circ. Res. 2018;123:849–867. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.311378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Stamatovic S.M., Shakui P., Keep R.F., Moore B.B., Kunkel S.L., Van Rooijen N., Andjelkovic A.V. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 regulation of blood-brain barrier permeability. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 2005;25:593–606. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Parsi M.M., Duval C., Ariëns R.A.S. Vascular dementia and crosstalk between the complement and coagulation systems. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021;8:803169. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.803169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Liu Q.H., He S.H., Groysman L., Shaked D., Russin J., Scotton T.C., Cen S., Mack W.J. White matter injury due to experimental chronic cerebral hypoperfusion is associated with C5 deposition. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e84802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084802. Erratum in PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e94516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Chen A., Oakley A.E., Monteiro M., Tuomela K., Allan L.M., Mukaetova-Ladinska E.B., O’Brien J.T., Kalaria R.N. Multiplex analyte assays to characterize different dementias: Brain inflammatory cytokines in poststroke and other dementias. Neurobiol. Aging. 2016;38:56–57. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.10.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Rosenberg G.A., Sullivan N., Esiri M.M. White matter damage is associated with matrix metalloproteinases in vascular dementia. Stroke. 2001;32:1162–1168. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.32.5.1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Sim F.J., Zhao C., Penderis J., Franklin R.J.M. The age-related decrease in CNS remyelination efficiency is attributable to an impairment of both oligodendrocyte progenitor recruitment and differentiation. J. Neurosci. 2002;22:2451–2459. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-07-02451.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ma Y., Wang J., Wang Y., Yang G.Y. The biphasic function of microglia in ischemic stroke. Prog. Neurobiol. 2017;157:247–272. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Poh L., Sim W.L., Jo D.G., Dinh Q.N., Drummond G.R., Sobey C.G., Chen C.L., Lai M.K.P., Fann D.Y., Arumugam T.V. The role of inflammasomes in vascular cognitive impairment. Mol. Neurodegener. 2022;17:4. doi: 10.1186/s13024-021-00506-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Lee K.M., Bang J.H., Kim B.Y., Lee I.S., Han J.S., Hwang B.Y., Jeon W.K. Fructus mume alleviates chronic cerebral hypoperfusion-induced white matter and hippocampal damage via inhibition of inflammation and downregulation of TLR4 and p38 MAPK signaling. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2015;15:125. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0652-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Coulthard L.R., White D.E., Jones D.L., McDermott M.F., Burchill S.A. p38(MAPK): Stress responses from molecular mechanisms to therapeutics. Trends Mol. Med. 2009;15:369–379. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2009.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Rajeev V., Fann D.Y., Dinh Q.N., Kim H.A., De Silva T.M., Lai M.K.P., Chen C.L., Drummond G.R., Sobey C.G., Arumugam T.V. Pathophysiology of blood brain barrier dysfunction during chronic cerebral hypoperfusion in vascular cognitive impairment. Theranostics. 2022;12:1639–1658. doi: 10.7150/thno.68304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Daneman R., Prat A. The blood-brain barrier. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015;7:a020412. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Armulik A., Genové G., Mäe M., Nisancioglu M.H., Wallgard E., Niaudet C., He L., Norlin J., Lindblom P., Strittmatter K., et al. Pericytes regulate the blood-brain barrier. Nature. 2010;468:557–561. doi: 10.1038/nature09522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Yao Y., Chen Z.L., Norris E.H., Strickland S. Astrocytic laminin regulates pericyte differentiation and maintains blood brain barrier integrity. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3413. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Wardlaw J.M., Sandercock P.A.G., Dennis M.S., Starr J. Is breakdown of the blood-brain barrier responsible for lacunar stroke, leukoaraiosis, and dementia? Stroke. 2003;34:806–812. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000058480.77236.B3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Ladecola C. The pathobiology of vascular dementia. Neuron. 2013;80:844–866. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Nation D.A., Sweeney M.D., Montagne A., Sagare A.P., D’Orazio L.M., Pachicano M., Sepehrband F., Nelson A.R., Buennagel D.P., Harrington M.G., et al. Blood-brain barrier breakdown is an early biomarker of human cognitive dysfunction. Nat. Med. 2019;25:270–276. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0297-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Saggu R., Schumacher T., Gerich F., Rakers C., Tai K., Delekate A., Petzold G.C. Astroglial NF-kB contributes to white matter damage and cognitive impairment in a mouse model of vascular dementia. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2016;4:76. doi: 10.1186/s40478-016-0350-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Kim J.H., Ko P.W., Lee H.W., Jeong J.Y., Lee M.G., Kim J.H., Lee W.H., Yu R., Oh W.J., Suk K. Astrocyte-derived lipocalin-2 mediates hippocampal damage and cognitive deficits in experimental models of vascular dementia. Glia. 2017;65:1471–1490. doi: 10.1002/glia.23174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Hussain B., Fang C., Chang J.L. Blood-Brain Barrier breakdown: An emerging biomarker of cognitive impairment in normal aging and dementia. Front. Neurosci. 2021;15:688090. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.688090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.DeGregori J., Johnson D.G. Distinct and overlapping roles for E2F family members in transcription, proliferation and apoptosis. Curr. Mol. Med. 2006;6:739–748. doi: 10.2174/1566524010606070739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kovesdi I., Reichel R., Nevins J.R. Identification of a cellular transcription factor involved in E1A trans-activation. Cell. 1986;45:219–228. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90386-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Yee A.S., Reichel R., Kovesdi I., Nevins J.R. Promoter interaction of the E1A- inducible factor E2F and its potential role in the formation of a multi-component complex. EMBO J. 1987;6:2061–2068. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02471.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Adams M.R., Sears R., Nuckolls F., Leone G., Nevins J.R. Complex transcriptional regulatory mechanisms control expression of the E2F3 locus. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000;20:36333639. doi: 10.1128/.20.10.3633-3639.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Leone G., Nuckolls F., Ishida S., Adams M., Sears R., Jakoi L., Miron A., Nevins J.R. Identification of a novel E2F3 product suggests a mechanism for determining specificity of repression by Rb proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000;20:3626–3632. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.10.3626-3632.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Di Stefano L., Jensen M.R., Helin K. E2F7, a novel E2F featuring DP- independent repression of a subset of E2F- regulated genes. EMBO J. 2003;22:6289–6298. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Trikha P., Sharma N., Opavsky R., Reyes A., Pena C., Ostrowski M.C., Roussel M.F., Leone G. E2f1-3 are critical for myeloid development. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:4783–4795. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.182733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Carr S.M., Poppy Roworth A., Chan C., La Thangue N.B. Post-translational control of transcription factors: Methylation ranks highly. FEBS J. 2015;282:4450–4465. doi: 10.1111/febs.13524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Zhang Y., Song X., Herrup K. Context-dependent functions of E2F1: Cell cycle, cell death, and DNA damage repair in cortical neurons. Mol. Neurobiol. 2020;57:2377–2390. doi: 10.1007/s12035-020-01887-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Fouad S., Hauton D., D’Angiolella V. E2F1: Cause and consequence of DNA replication stress. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021;7:599332. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.599332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Castillo D.S., Campalans A., Belluscio L.M., Carcagno A.L., Radicella J.P., Cánepa E.T., Pregi N. E2F1 and E2F2 induction in response to DNA damage preserves genomic stability in neuronal cells. Cell Cycle. 2015;14:1300–1314. doi: 10.4161/15384101.2014.985031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Biswas A.K., Johnson D.G. Transcriptional and nontranscriptional functions of E2F1 in response to DNA damage. Cancer Res. 2012;72:13–17. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-2196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Ting J.H., Marks D.R., Schleidt S.S., Wu J.N., Zyskind J.W., Lindl K.A., Blendy J.A., Pierce R.C., Jordan-Sciutto K.L. Targeted gene mutation of E2F1 evokes age-dependent synaptic disruption and behavioral deficits. J. Neurochem. 2014;129:850–863. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Carnevale J., Palander O., Seifried L.A., Dick F.A. DNA damage signals through differentially modified E2F1 molecules to induce apoptosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012;32:900–912. doi: 10.1128/mcb.06286-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Stanelle J., Pützer B.M. E2F1-induced apoptosis: Turning killers into therapeutics. Trends Mol. Med. 2006;12:177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2006.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Engelmann D., Pützer B.M. The dark side of E2F1: In transit beyond apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2012;72:571–575. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Denechaud P.D., Fajas L., Giralt A. E2F1, a novel regulator of metabolism. Front. Endocrinol. 2017;8:311. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Liu X., Hu C. Novel potential therapeutic target for E2F1 and prognostic factors of E2F1/2/3/5/7/8 in human gastric cancer. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 2020;18:824–838. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2020.07.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Polager S., Ginsberg D. P53 and E2f: Partners in life and death. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2009;9:738–748. doi: 10.1038/nrc2718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Wang Y., Shyam N., Ting J.H., Akay C., Lindl K.A., Jordan-Sciutto K.L. E2F1 localizes predominantly to neuronal cytoplasm and fails to induce expression of its transcriptional targets in human immunodeficiency virus-induced neuronal damage. Neurosci. Lett. 2010;479:97–101. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Raimundo N., Song L., Shutt T.E., McKay S.E., Cotney J., Guan M.X., Gilliland T.C., Hohuan D., Santos-Sacchi J., Shadel G.S. Mitochondrial stress engages E2F1 apoptotic signaling to cause deafness. Cell. 2012;148:716–726. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Ma L., Yu H.J., Gan S.W., Gong R., Mou K.J., Xue J., Sun S.Q. P53-mediated oligodendrocyte apoptosis initiates demyelination after compressed spinal cord injury by enhancing ER-mitochondria interaction and E2F1 expression. Neurosci. Lett. 2017;644:55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.02.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Dyson N. The regulation of E2F by pRB-family proteins. Genes Dev. 1998;12:2245–2262. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.15.2245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Frolov M.V., Dyson N.J. Molecular mechanisms of E2F-dependent activation and pRB-mediated repression. J. Cell Sci. 2004;117:2173–2181. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Polager S., Kalma Y., Berkovich E., Ginsberg D. E2Fs up-regulate expression of genes involved in DNA replication, DNA repair and mitosis. Oncogene. 2002;21:437–446. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.La Thangue N.B. DP and E2F proteins: Components of a heterodimeric transcription factor implicated in cell cycle control. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1994;6:443–450. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90038-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Wu L., Timmers C., Maiti B., Saavedra H.I., Sang L., Chong G.T., Nuckolls F., Giangrande P., Wright F.A., Field S.J., et al. The E2F1-3 transcription factors are essential for cellular proliferation. Nature. 2001;414:457–462. doi: 10.1038/35106593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Nevins J.R. The Rb/E2F pathway and cancer. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001;10:699–703. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.7.699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Bieda M., Xu X., Singer M.A., Green R., Farnham P.J. Unbiased location analysis of E2F1-binding sites suggests a widespread role for E2F1 in the human genome. Genome Res. 2006;16:595–605. doi: 10.1101/gr.4887606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Ouyang Z.Q., Zhou Q., Wong W.H. ChIP-Seq of transcription factors predicts absolute and differential gene expression in embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:21521–21526. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904863106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Tarangelo A., Lo N., Teng R., Kim E., Le L., Watson D., Furth E.E., Raman P., Ehmer U., Viatour P. Recruitment of Pontin/Reptin by E2f1 amplifies E2f transcriptional response during cancer progression. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:10028. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Denechaud P.D., Lopez-Mejia I.C., Giralt A., Lai Q., Blanchet E., Delacuisine B., Nicolay B.N., Dyson N.J., Bonner C., Pattou F., et al. E2F1 mediates sustained lipogenesis and contributes to hepatic steatosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2016;126:137–150. doi: 10.1172/JCI81542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Engelmann D., Pützer B.M. Translating DNA damage into cancer cell death-a roadmap for E2F1 apoptotic signalling and opportunities for new drug combinations to overcome chemoresistance. Drug Resist. Updat. 2010;13:119–131. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2010.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Meng P., Ghosh R. Transcription addiction: Can we garner the Yin and Yang functions of E2F1 for cancer therapy? Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1360. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Chen H.Z., Tsai S.Y., Leone G. Emerging roles of E2Fs in cancer: An exit from cell cycle control. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2009;9:785–797. doi: 10.1038/nrc2696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.De Bruin A., Maiti B., Jakoi L., Timmers C., Buerki R., Leone G. Identification and characterization of E2F7, a novel mammalian E2F family member capable of blocking cellular proliferation. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:42041–42049. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308105200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Maiti B., Li J., de Bruin A., Gordon F., Timmers C., Opavsky R., Patil K., Tuttle J., Cleghorn W., Leone G. Cloning and characterization of mouse E2F8, a novel mammalian E2F family member capable of blocking cellular proliferation. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:18211–18220. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501410200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Leone G., Sears R., Huang E., Rempel R., Nuckolls F., Park C.H., Giangrande P., Wu L., Saavedra H.I., Field S.J., et al. Myc requires distinct E2F activities to induce S phase and apoptosis. Mol. Cell. 2001;8:105–113. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00275-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Leung J.Y., Ehmann G.L., Giangrande P.H., Nevins J.R. A role for Myc in facilitating transcription activation by E2F1. Oncogene. 2008;27:4172–4179. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Thurlings I., De Bruin A. E2F transcription factors control the roller coaster ride of cell cycle gene expression. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016;1342:71–88. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2957-3_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Loftus S.J., Liu G., Carr S.M., Munro S., La Thangue N.B. NEDDylation regulates E2F1-dependent transcription. EMBO Rep. 2012;13:811–818. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Munro S., Carr S.M., La Thangue N.B. Diversity within the pRb pathway: Is there a code of conduct? Oncogene. 2012;31:4343–4352. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Van Den Broeck A., Nissou D., Brambilla E., Eymin B., Gazzeri S. Activation of a Tip60/E2F1/ERCC1 network in human lung adenocarcinoma cells exposed to cisplatin. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:320–325. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Zheng S., Moehlenbrink J., Lu Y.C., Zalmas L.P., Sagum C.A., Carr S., McGouran J.F., Alexander L., Fedorov O., Munro S., et al. Arginine methylation- dependent reader- writer interplay governs growth control by E2F-1. Mol. Cell. 2013;52:37–51. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Kumari A., Iwasaki T., Pyndiah S., Cassimere E.K., Palani C.D., Sakamuro D. Regulation of E2F1-induced apoptosis by poly(ADP- ribosyl)ation. Cell Death Differ. 2015;22:311–322. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Peart M.J., Poyurovsky M.V., Kass E.M., Urist M., Verschuren E.W., Summers M.K., Jackson P.K., Prives C. APC/C(Cdc20) targets E2F1 for degradation in prometaphase. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:3956–3964. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.19.13162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Budhavarapu V.N., White E.D., Mahanic C.S., Chen L., Lin F.T., Lin W.C. Regulation of E2F1 by APC/C Cdh1 via K11 linkage- specific ubiquitin chain formation. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:2030–2038. doi: 10.4161/cc.20643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Boekhout M., Yuan R., Wondergem A.P., Segeren H.A., van Liere E.A., Awol N., Jansen I., Wolthuis R.M., de Bruin A., Westendorp B. Feedback regulation between atypical E2Fs and APC/CCdh1 coordinates cell cycle progression. EMBO Rep. 2016;17:414–427. doi: 10.15252/embr.201540984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Cappell S.D., Mark K.G., Garbett D., Pack L.R., Rape M., Meyer T. EMI1 switches from being a substrate to an inhibitor of APC/CCDH1 to start the cell cycle. Nature. 2018;558:313–317. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0199-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Clijsters L., Hoencamp C., Calis J.J.A., Marzio A., Handgraaf S.M., Cuitino M.C., Rosenberg B.R., Leone G., Pagano M. Cyclin F controls cell cycle transcriptional outputs by directing the degradation of the three activator E2Fs. Mol. Cell. 2019;74:1264–1277. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Komori H., Enomoto M., Nakamura M., Iwanaga R., Ohtani K. Distinct E2F-mediated transcriptional program regulates p14ARF gene expression. EMBO J. 2005;24:3724–3736. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Stott F.J., Bates S., James M.C., McConnell B.B., Starborg M., Brookes S., Palmero I., Ryan K., Hara E., Vousden K.H., et al. The alternative product from the human CDKN2A locus, p14(ARF), participates in a regulatory feedback loop with p53 and MDM2. EMBO J. 1998;17:5001–5014. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.17.5001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Cheng Q., Chen J.D. Mechanism of p53 stabilization by ATM after DNA damage. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:472–478. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.3.10556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Berkovich E., Ginsberg D. ATM is a target for positive regulation by E2F–1. Oncogene. 2003;22:161–167. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Powers J.T., Hong S., Mayhew C.N., Rogers P.M., Knudsen E.S., Johnson D.G. E2F1 uses the ATM signaling pathway to induce p53 and Chk2 phosphorylation and apoptosis. Mol. Cancer Res. 2004;2:203–214. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.203.2.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Saito S., Goodarzi A.A., Higashimoto Y., Noda Y., Lees-Miller S.P., Appella E., Anderson C.W. ATM mediates phosphorylation at multiple p53 sites, including Ser46, in response to ionizing radiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:12491–12494. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C200093200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Ryo A., Liou Y.C., Wulf G., Nakamura M., Lee S.W., Lu K.P. PIN1 is an E2F target gene essential for Neu/Ras-induced transformation of mammary epithelial cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002;22:5281–5295. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.15.5281-5295.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Zheng H., You H., Zhou X.Z., Murray S.A., Uchida T., Wulf G., Gu L., Tang X., Lu K.P., Xiao Z.X. The prolyl isomerase Pin1 is a regulator of p53 in genotoxic response. Nature. 2002;419:849–853. doi: 10.1038/nature01116. Erratum in Nature 2002, 420, 445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Sorrentino G., Mioni M., Giorgi C., Ruggeri N., Pinton P., Moll U., Mantovani F., Del Sal G. The prolyl-isomerase Pin1 activates the mitochondrial death program of p53. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20:198–208. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2012.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Hershko T., Chaussepied M., Oren M., Ginsberg D. Novel link between E2F and p53: Proapoptotic cofactors of p53 are transcriptionally upregulated by, E2F. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12:377–383. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Hershko T., Ginsberg D. Up-regulation of Bcl-2 homology 3 (BH3)-only proteins by E2F1 mediates apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:8627–8634. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312866200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Afshar G., Jelluma N., Yang X., Basila D., Arvold N.D., Karlsson A., Yount G.L., Dansen T.B., Koller E., Haas-Kogan D.A. Radiation-induced caspase-8 mediates p53-independent apoptosis in glioma cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66:4223–4232. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Giovanni A., Keramaris E., Morris E.J., Hou S.T., O’Hare M., Dyson N., Robertson G.S., Slack R.S., Park D.S. E2F1 mediates death of B-amyloid-treated cortical neurons in a manner independent of p53 and dependent on Bax and caspase 3. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:11553–11560. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.16.11553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Moroni M.C., Hickman E.S., Denchi E.L., Caprara G., Colli E., Cecconi F., Müller H., Helin K. Apaf-1 is a transcriptional target for E2F and p53. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001;3:552–558. doi: 10.1038/35078527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Nahle Z., Polakoff J., Davuluri R.V., McCurrach M.E., Jacobson M.D., Narita M., Zhang M.Q., Lazebnik Y., Bar-Sagi D., Lowe S.W. Direct coupling of the cell cycle and cell death machinery by E2F. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002;4:859–864. doi: 10.1038/ncb868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Stiewe T., Pützer B.M. Role of the p53-homologue p73 in E2F1-induced apoptosis. Nat. Genet. 2000;26:464–469. doi: 10.1038/82617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Melino G., Bernassola F., Ranalli M., Yee K., Zong W.X., Corazzari M., Knight R.A., Green D.R., Thompson C., Vousden K.H. p73 induces apoptosis via PUMA transactivation and Bax mitochondrial translocation. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:8076–8083. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307469200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.John K., Alla V., Meier C., Pützer B.M. GRAMD4 mimics p53 and mediates the apoptotic function of p73 at mitochondria. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18:874–886. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2010.153. Erratum in Cell Death Differ. 2012, 19, 552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Datta A., Nag A., Raychaudhuri P. Differential regulation of E2F1, DP1, and the E2F1/DP1 complex by ARF. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002;22:8398–8408. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.24.8398-8408.2002. Erratum in Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23, 3374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Jin Y.Q., An G.S., Ni J.H., Li S.Y., Jia H.T. ATM-dependent E2F1 accumulation in the nucleolus is an indicator of ribosomal stress in early response to DNA damage. Cell Cycle. 2014;13:1627–1638. doi: 10.4161/cc.28605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Paik J.C., Wang B., Liu K., Lue J.K., Lin W.C. Regulation of E2F1-induced apoptosis by the nucleolar protein, RRP1B. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:6348–6363. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.072074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Folch J., Junyent F., Verdaguer E., Auladell C., Pizarro J.G., Beas-Zarate C., Pallàs M., Camins A. Role of cell cycle re-entry in neurons: A common apoptotic mechanism of neuronal cell death. Neurotox. Res. 2012;22:195–207. doi: 10.1007/s12640-011-9277-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Tuerxun M., Muhda A., Yin L. The molecular mechanisms of signal pathway activating effect of E2F-1/NF-κB/GSK-3β on cognitive dysfunction of Alzheimer rats. Bioengineered. 2021;12:10000–10008. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1989261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Ding Y., Luan W., Shen X., Wang Z., Cao Y.J. E2F1 mediates traumatic brain injury and regulates BDNF-AS to promote the progression of Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurotox. Res. 2024;42:17. doi: 10.1007/s12640-024-00695-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Wang J., Yin D.P., Liu Y.X., Baer R., Yin Y. Dual specificity phosphatase 1/CL100 is a direct transcriptional target of E2F-1 in the apoptotic response to oxidative stress. Cancer Res. 2007;67:6737–6744. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Wang F., Yang F., Yang G., Zhou Q., Lv H. Down-regulation of E2F1 attenuates UVB-induced human lens epithelial cell oxidative stress and pyroptosis through inhibiting NLRP3. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2025;44:9603271241309258. doi: 10.1177/09603271241309258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Yuan Y.J., Chen T., Yang Y.L., Han H.N., Xu L.M. E2F1/CDK5/DRP1 axis mediates microglial mitochondrial division and autophagy in the pathogenesis of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. Clin. Transl. Med. 2025;15:e70197. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.70197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Huang T., González Y.R., Qu D., Huang E., Safarpour F., Wang E., Joselin A., Im D.S., Callaghan S.M., Boonying W., et al. The pro-death role of Cited2 in stroke is regulated by E2F1/4 transcription factors. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294:8617–8629. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Zhang Y., Zhang Y., Aman Y., Ng C.T., Chau W.H., Zhang Z., Yue M., Bohm C., Jia Y., Li S., et al. Amyloid-β toxicity modulates tau phosphorylation through the PAX6 signalling pathway. Brain. 2021;144:2759–2770. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Demyanenko S., Uzdensky A. Profiling of signaling proteins in penumbra after focal photothrombotic infarct in the rat brain cortex. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017;54:6839–6856. doi: 10.1007/s12035-016-0191-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.MacManus J.P., Jian M., Preston E., Rasquinha I., Webster J., Zurakowski B. Absence of the transcription factor E2F1 attenuates brain injury and improves behavior after focal ischemia in mice. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2003;23:1020–1028. doi: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000084249.20114.FA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Li Y., Chopp M., Zhang Z.G., Zaloga C., Niewenhuis L., Gautam S. p53-immunoreactive protein and p53 mRNA expression after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. Stroke. 1994;25:849–856. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.4.849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Camins A., Verdaguer E., Folch J., Beas-Zarate C., Canudas A.M., Pallàs M. Inhibition of ataxia telangiectasia-p53-E2F-1 pathway in neurons as a target for the prevention of neuronal apoptosis. Curr. Drug Metab. 2007;8:709–715. doi: 10.2174/138920007782109814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Bashari D., Hacohen D., Ginsberg D. JNK activation is regulated by E2F and promotes E2F1-induced apoptosis. Cell. Signal. 2011;23:65–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Haim Y., Blüher M., Konrad D., Goldstein N., Klöting N., Harman-Boehm I., Kirshtein B., Ginsberg D., Tarnovscki T., Gepner Y., et al. ASK1 (MAP3K5) is transcriptionally upregulated by E2F1 in adipose tissue in obesity, molecularly defining a human dys-metabolic obese phenotype. Mol. Metab. 2017;6:725–736. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Gao Y., Signore A.P., Yin W., Cao G., Yin X.M., Sun F., Luo Y., Graham S.H., Chen J. Neuroprotection against focal ischemic brain injury by inhibition of c-Jun N-terminal kinase and attenuation of the mitochondrial apoptosis-signaling pathway. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 2005;25:694–712. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.De Olano N., Koo C.Y., Monteiro L.J., Pinto P.H., Gomes A.R., Aligue R., Lam E.W. The p38 MAPK-MK2 axis regulates E2F1 and FOXM1 expression after epirubicin treatment. Mol. Cancer Res. 2012;10:1189–1202. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0559. Erratum in Mol. Cancer Res. 2026, 24, 199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Hou S.T., Xie X., Baggley A., Park D.S., Chen G., Walker T. Activation of the Rb/E2F1 pathway by the nonproliferative p38 MAPK during Fas (APO1/CD95)-mediated neuronal apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:48764–48770. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206336200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Roos W.P., Kaina B. DNA damage-induced cell death by apoptosis. Trends Mol. Med. 2006;12:440–450. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2006.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Das A.K., Biswas S.C. Cdc25A phosphatase is activated and mediates neuronal cell death by PUMA via pRb/E2F1 pathway in a model of Parkinson’s disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2024;1871:119848. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2024.119848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Mathew R., Karantza-Wadsworth V., White E. Role of autophagy in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2007;7:961–967. doi: 10.1038/nrc2254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Polager S., Ofir M., Ginsberg D. E2F1 regulates autophagy and the transcription of autophagy genes. Oncogene. 2008;27:4860–4864. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Wen H., Gris D., Lei Y., Jha S., Zhang L., Huang M.T., Brickey W.J., Ting J.P. Fatty acid-induced NLRP3-ASC inflammasome activation interferes with insulin signaling. Nat. Immunol. 2011;12:408–415. doi: 10.1038/ni.2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Zhang L., Wang H., Li W. PRMT5 up-regulation improves myocardial hypertrophy by mediating E2F-1/NF-κB/NLRP3 pathway. Prev. Med. 2023;172:107553. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Mao Y., Jiang F., Xu X.J., Zhou B., Jin R., Zhuang L.L., Juan C.X., Zhou G.P. Inhibition of IGF2BP1 attenuates renal injury and inflammation by alleviating m6A modifications and E2F1/MIF pathway. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2023;19:593–609. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.78348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Zhang L., Sheppard O.R., Shah A.M., Brewer A.C. Positive regulation of the NADPH oxidase NOX4 promoter in vascular smooth muscle cells by E2F. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2008;45:679–685. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Qin G., Kishore R., Dolan C.M., Silver M., Wecker A., Luedemann C.N., Thorne T., Hanley A., Curry C., Heyd L., et al. Cell cycle regulator E2F1 modulates angiogenesis via p53-dependent transcriptional control of VEGF. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:11015–11020. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509533103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Gao X., Liu X., Wang N., Cui C., Liu W., Yang M., Li Q., Ou Y., Ning A., Wei X., et al. Nanoparticles hijack calvarial immune cells for CNS drug delivery and stroke therapy. Cell. 2026;189:1341–1355.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.



