Abstract
Background:
Prime mass amino acids residues, assigned based upon the nominal mass of their repeating structure in peptides and proteins, have been found to occur more often than by chance. These 9 such residues are predominantly hydrophobic in character and thus play an important role in protein stability and folding. This study investigates their prevalence in human proteins and the function of such proteins.
Objectives:
To identify human proteins rich in the prime mass residues and assess their functions.
Results:
Prime-rich proteins are found to proliferate among those important to transcriptional events, cell adhesion, and the formation of cell surface membranes. Eighteen prime-rich proteins are identified that are abundant in 3 or 4 prime residues, the latter notably contain alanine, cysteine, histidine or threonine, and proline. The percentage of prime residues in these prime-rich proteins exceeds one-half (>50%) of all residues in many cases, and these residues are found to be concentrated in particular regions of the protein.
Conclusion:
Proteins rich in prime residues are found to play an important role in biological events important to cellular life. Such prime residues represent those associated with the highest hydrophobicity, and those essential to protein folding and function. Many prime residues were recruited early into the genetic code according to the composition of the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) proteins. Consideration is given to whether the formation of evolution of these proteins is predicated by the primality of the residues or their physicochemical and structural properties. This remains an open question and awaits further inquiry and debate.
Keywords: prime, mass, protein, biology, function
Introduction
Amino acids have long been defined based on their physicochemical properties ranging from charged or non-charged, hydrophobic or hydrophilic, polar or non-polar, acidic or basic, and aliphatic or aromatic. Such definitions have their limitations 1 since many residues exhibit multiple characteristics based on the nature of their side-chains, and measures of these properties differ both for the free amino acids and within the protein polymers comprised of them. Further, the number of scales for any one property is very large; there are more than a hundred scales related to hydrophobicity alone. 2 This is confounding and computationally burdensome when attempting to accurately predict protein properties and define them numerically. 3
A more rigid definition of amino acids is associated with their physical mass. This is calculated from their elemental composition, through a summation of the masses of their component atoms. The nominal mass is even for the most abundant isotopes for carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and sulphur; namely 12 (standardised), 14, 16 and 32 respectively. Only that for hydrogen is odd (ie, 1). 4 It has been found that amino acid residues with an odd number of hydrogen atoms have residue masses that are prime more often than by chance. 4
Prime mass residues are defined as those whose repeating unit [–NH–CH(R)–C(=O)–] in a peptide or protein chain have an odd number of hydrogen atoms and where the mass of this unit is divisible only by 1 and that mass. 4 Further, the total number of each element, carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, and sulphur, across all prime residues is also prime. 4
It is logical therefore to classify such molecular entities as prime based on their atomic construct.
Since all natural numbers can be expressed as a multiple of primes, prime numbers are considered to be the building blocks of natural numbers, as atoms are the building blocks of all matter.5,6 Prime numbers have been found to have a real world significance in biology.7-9 There is also an interest in being able to express proteins and other biological information in the form of numbers in order to construct a computable language.
There are 9 prime mass residues: alanine, cysteine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, proline, threonine, and tyrosine. The majority are considered hydrophobic and thus play an important role in folding and structure formation by expelling water from a protein’s core. Cysteine, that forms bridges that restrict protein structures, is also a prime residue, as is its sulphur-containing counterpart methionine. Histidine and tyrosine are both metal-binding residues that help bridge residue side chains are also prime. Proline is also a prime residue. Its side chain attaches itself twice to the backbone at both the alpha-carbon and amide nitrogen atom. As a consequence, the flexibility of the protein’s backbone is restricted and this residue is known to disrupt alpha-helix formation and promote beta-turns.
In a symbol of their collective biological importance, two-thirds of prime residues (namely histidine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, threonine, and even tyrosine) represent amino acids that are essential to the diet of humans. It is also noteworthy, from an evolutionary and coding perspective, that there is a strong correlation between the occurrence of each amino acid residue within proteins of the human proteome and their codon frequency 4 compared with the non-prime residues.
In this study their prevalence is examined more closely through the identification of all human proteins that are rich in prime residues. Further, the biological function of the identified proteins is reported together with their evolutionary significance in the early stages of life.
Materials and Methods
Designation of Prime Residues
Prime residues have been defined as those whose repeating unit [–NH–CH(R)–C(=O)–] in a peptide or protein chain have an integer or nominal mass that is a prime number, namely a number that is only divisible by the number 1 and itself. 4 Nine of a total fifteen odd mass residues, all of which contain an odd number of hydrogen atoms, have prime masses. These are alanine (A), cysteine (C), histidine (H), isoleucine (I), leucine (L), methionine (M), proline (P), threonine (T), and tyrosine (Y). 4 In single letter code, they form the word LYMPHATIC that can be conveniently recalled to remember them. Such residues are referred to interchangeably as prime mass and prime residues in this work.
Search of Uniprot/Swiss-Prot Databases for Prime-Rich Residues
The ScanProsite 13 online web-based tool (https://prosite.expasy.org/scanprosite/) was used to search the Prosite database. 10 The tool adopts ProRules dependent annotation templates to identify proteins within a database with particular structural and functional characteristics. The Prosite database contains the protein domains, families and functional sites 11 derived from the combined Uniprot/SWISS-PROT (UniProtKB) database (Release 2025_02 of 09/04/25 containing 573,230 entries). Human proteins (lineage = Homo sapiens) rich in prime residues were identified using increasing numbers and combinations of the Proscan descriptors for each of the residues: PS50310 for alanine (A), PS50311 for cysteine (C), PS50316 for histidine (H), PS50317 for isoleucine (I), PS50319 for leucine (L), PS50320 for methionine (M), PS50099 for proline (P), PS50325 for threonine (T), and PS50328 for tyrosine (Y). As no hits were found for isoleucine, it was excluded from further analysis. The maximum number of residues found in prime rich proteins was found to be 4 with the combinations [A, C, H, P] and [A, C, T, P].
Identification of Amino Acid Composition in Prime-Rich Proteins and Their Components
The ProtParam 12 online web-based tool (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/) was used to compute the amino acid compositions and the level of prime residue enrichment in each of the human proteins identified that were rich in 3 or 4 prime residues. The tool also reports domains rich in each prime residue, those residues of a particular physicochemical character, and those associated with particular structural motifs, disorder, or function. The same tool was also used to interrogate the prime-rich domains alone.
Results
Identification of Prime-Rich Proteins and Their Residue Enrichments
The Uniprot knowledgebase (UniprotKB) was searched for all human proteins rich in prime mass residues using the ScanProsite tool. 13 Using PROSITE signatures (of the form PS50XXX), 11 the algorithm can search the combined Uniprot/SWISS-PROT protein database for proteins rich in specified residues; in this case prime-rich residues.
The combined protein database was searched accordingly for increasing numbers of the prime residues: alanine, cysteine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, proline, threonine, and tyrosine. The results of searches for single and 2 prime-rich residues are shown in Supplemental Table 1. The number of proteins identified ranged from 0 for isoleucine to 1702 for proline alone (see shaded boxes). In combination (unshaded), the majority of hits were identified for prime pairs containing alanine, cysteine, histidine and proline. As no hits were found when searches were conducted for isoleucine, this residue was subsequently excluded from all further analyses.
To narrow the number of matches, a series of additional searches were performed for 3 of the remaining 8 prime residues at a time. These results are summarised in Supplemental Table 2. At most, the searches returned 1 hit each with 9 and 4 sequences, but most hits identified either 1 or 0 sequences (Table 2). Seven combinations of 3 prime residues that identified at least 1 protein are: [A, C, H], [A, H, P], [C, L, T], [L, T, P], [M, P, T], [A, T, P], [A, C, T]. Adding a fourth prime residue to each of these combinations, only 2, namely [A, C, H, P] and [A, C, T, P], returned a single protein hit each.
Table 2.
Percentage of Prime Residues in Prime-Rich Proteins.
| Protein ID | No. of amino acids | % Total prime mass residues | % Each prime mass residue | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q9BXQ6 | 578 | 50.0 | A | 14.2 |
| C | 3.5 | |||
| H | 2.2 | |||
| I | 2.1 | |||
| L | 12.3 | |||
| M | 0.9 | |||
| P | 8.7 | |||
| T | 4.0 | |||
| Y | 2.1 | |||
| Q9H1U4 | 602 | 51.2 | A | 8.6 |
| C | 7.0 | |||
| H | 1.8 | |||
| I | 3.8 | |||
| L | 0.7 | |||
| M | 6.5 | |||
| P | 10.0 | |||
| T | 10.1 | |||
| Y | 2.7 | |||
| Q8NDT2 | 890 | 40.8 | A | 9.6 |
| C | 0.6 | |||
| H | 3.6 | |||
| I | 2.1 | |||
| L | 9.0 | |||
| M | 1.1 | |||
| P | 7.6 | |||
| T | 3.9 | |||
| Y | 3.3 | |||
| Q4VCS5 | 1084 | 46.8 | A | 12.8 |
| C | 0.7 | |||
| H | 3.4 | |||
| I | 2.9 | |||
| L | 7.9 | |||
| M | 2.4 | |||
| P | 9.2 | |||
| T | 5.4 | |||
| Y | 2.1 | |||
| P58012 | 376 | 56.2 | A | 17.3 |
| C | 1.6 | |||
| H | 3.7 | |||
| I | 1.9 | |||
| L | 6.1 | |||
| M | 2.7 | |||
| P | 16.2 | |||
| T | 2.4 | |||
| Y | 4.3 | |||
| Q5VYV0 | 432 | 55.8 | A | 14.8 |
| C | 0.9 | |||
| H | 9.3 | |||
| I | 2.3 | |||
| L | 6.2 | |||
| M | 2.3 | |||
| P | 15.0 | |||
| T | 2.5 | |||
| Y | 2.5 | |||
| P20264 | 500 | 47.8 | A | 14.0 |
| C | 0.8 | |||
| H | 6.6 | |||
| I | 1.6 | |||
| L | 6.6 | |||
| M | 2.2 | |||
| P | 10.8 | |||
| T | 4.2 | |||
| Y | 1.0 | |||
| Q99626 | 313 | 49.6 | A | 12.8 |
| C | 0.6 | |||
| H | 4.5 | |||
| I | 1.3 | |||
| L | 7.7 | |||
| M | 1.3 | |||
| P | 13.7 | |||
| T | 3.2 | |||
| Y | 4.5 | |||
| Q2VWA4 | 1015 | 45.8 | A | 11.9 |
| C | 1.9 | |||
| H | 4.6 | |||
| I | 2.1 | |||
| L | 7.9 | |||
| M | 0.9 | |||
| P | 12.8 | |||
| T | 2.2 | |||
| Y | 1.5 | |||
| Q8NFD5 | 2319 | 44.0 | A | 9.7 |
| C | 0.8 | |||
| H | 2.9 | |||
| I | 2.5 | |||
| L | 6.0 | |||
| M | 4.4 | |||
| P | 11.6 | |||
| T | 3.1 | |||
| Y | 3.0 | |||
| O14776 | 1098 | 43.2 | A | 9.9 |
| C | 0.4 | |||
| H | 1.4 | |||
| I | 3.9 | |||
| L | 5.1 | |||
| M | 3.5 | |||
| P | 10.8 | |||
| T | 6.6 | |||
| Y | 1.6 | |||
| O60641 | 907 | 48.3 | A | 16.0 |
| C | 0.4 | |||
| H | 0.9 | |||
| I | 2.3 | |||
| L | 7.7 | |||
| M | 2.9 | |||
| P | 11.4 | |||
| T | 8.6 | |||
| Y | 1.0 | |||
| P51610 | 2035 | 51.3 | A | 11.5 |
| C | 1.7 | |||
| H | 1.7 | |||
| I | 3.8 | |||
| L | 6.8 | |||
| M | 1.9 | |||
| P | 9.5 | |||
| T | 13.2 | |||
| Y | 1.2 | |||
| Q14114 | 963 | 44.7 | A | 7.6 |
| C | 6.5 | |||
| H | 2.7 | |||
| I | 4.0 | |||
| L | 8.9 | |||
| M | 1.1 | |||
| P | 6.5 | |||
| T | 5.3 | |||
| Y | 2.1 | |||
| P07359 | 652 | 52.1 | A | 4.3 |
| C | 1.4 | |||
| H | 2.3 | |||
| I | 1.8 | |||
| L | 16.7 | |||
| M | 0.9 | |||
| P | 11.8 | |||
| T | 11.7 | |||
| Y | 2.1 | |||
| O43670 | 478 | 54.6 | A | 7.1 |
| C | 1.0 | |||
| H | 2.1 | |||
| I | 4.2 | |||
| L | 4.6 | |||
| M | 6.5 | |||
| P | 19.9 | |||
| T | 6.7 | |||
| Y | 2.5 | |||
Table 1 lists the identified proteins rich in 3 and 4 prime residues. Together with their Uniprot identifier and reported function, the regions rich in each of the prime mass residue are shown. It is immediately apparent that the prime-rich proteins are those important to cellular events. Transcriptional regulation proteins, cell surface receptors and those associated with the adhesion of ligands, proteins involved in the formation of cell surface membranes, and cytoskeletal protein polymerisation, all feature. These biological events are all important to early life cycle events.
Table 1.
Identity of Proteins Containing 3 and 4 Prime-Rich Residue Segments and Their Biological Function.
| Prime residue combination (3 and 4) | No. of seq. hits | Uniprot identifier | Protein name | Prime rich-residue regions from ScanProsite outputs | Function a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [A, C, H] | 1 | Q9BXQ6 | Transmembrane protein 121B | A: 256-317, C: 168-177, H: 261-275 | Transmembrane protein |
| [A, C, T] | 1 | Q9H1U4 | Multiple epidermal growth factor-like domains protein 9 | A: 24-38, C: 204-437, T: 102-174 | Transmembrane protein with role in cell adhesion |
| [A, H, P] | 9 | Q8NDT2 | Putative RNA-binding protein 15B | A: 270-295, H: 658-677, P: 110-129 | Regulator of RNA methylation |
| Q4VCS5 | Angiomotin | A: 876-1032, H: 385-391, P: 973-1037 | Regulates endothelial cell migration | ||
| P58012 | Forkhead box protein L2 | A: 221-348, H: 289-312, P: 280-341 | Transcriptional regulator | ||
| Q5VYV0 | Forkhead box protein B2 | A: 220-261, H: 116-181, P: 162-214 | Transcriptional regulator | ||
| P20264 | POU domain, class 3, transcription factor 3 | A: 81-204, H: 133-184, P: 270-294 | Transcription factor | ||
| Q99626 | Homeobox protein CDX-2 | A: 46-153, H: 114-125, P: 257-284 | Transcription factor | ||
| Q9BXQ6 | Transmembrane protein 121B | A: 46-153, H: 114-125, P: 257-284 | Transmembrane protein | ||
| Q2VWA4 | SKI family transcriptional co-repressor 2 | A: 261-448, H: 603-668, P: 285-294 + 465-711 | Transcriptional repressor | ||
| Q8NFD5 | AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1B | A: 2-130 + 412-576, H: 164-187, P: 582-590 | Regulates transcriptional activation and repression | ||
| [A, T, P] | 4 | O14776 | Transcription elongation regulator 1 | A: 178-258, T: 260-331, P: 32-132 | Transcriptional regulator |
| O60641 | Clathrin coat assembly protein AP180 | A: 361-583, T: 536-556, P: 809-897 | Link clathrin to receptors in coated vesicles | ||
| Q9H1U4 | Multiple epidermal growth factor-like domains protein 9 | A: 24-38, T: 102-174, P: 55-200 | Transmembrane protein with role in cell adhesion | ||
| P51610 | Host cell factor 1 | A: 1613-1645, T: 574-1491, P: 412-456 | Transcriptional co-regulator | ||
| [C, L, T] | 1 | Q14114 | Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 8 | C: 47-401, L: 9-38, T: 741-781 | Cell surface receptor |
| [L, T, P] | 1 | P07359 | Platelet glycoprotein Ib alpha chain | L: 3-195, T: 345-482, P: 382-456 | Surface membrane protein participates plug formation |
| [M, P, T] | 1 | O43670 | BUB3-interacting and GLEBS motif-containing zinc finger protein | M: 164-209, T: 310-360, P: 129-470 | Promotes tubulin polymerisation bundling |
| [A, C, H, P] | 1 | Q9BXQ6 | Transmembrane protein 121B | A: 256-317, C: 168-177, H: 261-275, P: 537-548 | Transmembrane protein |
| [A, C, T, P] | 1 | Q9H1U4 | Multiple epidermal growth factor-like domains protein 9 | A: 24-38, C: 204-437, T: 102-174, P: 55-200 | Transmembrane protein with role in cell adhesion |
Function based on cited reports in Uniprot database.
The level of prime-residue enrichment, calculated for each protein entry using the ProtParam Tool, is shown in Table 2. For the most common 5 prime residues in the combinations above, namely A, C, H, T, and P, the enrichment levels range from 7.1% to 17.3% for alanine, 0.6% to 6.5% for cysteine, 1.4% to 9.3% for histidine, 2.2% to 13.2% for threonine, and 6.5% to 19.9% for proline. The levels of proline across all 16 proteins identified in Table 2 are particularly high and exceed 10% in 11 of the proteins. In a random distribution of 20 amino acids, without codon bias or structural considerations, one would expect some 5% (100%/20) of all residues to be proline.
Total prime residue enrichment ranges from 40.8% to 54.6% across the proteins, in other words, up to an exceeding one-half of all residues. In the 34.8 kDa zinc-finger protein (Uniprot entry O43670), proline levels approach 20% or one-fifth of all 478 residues. Over one-half (or 54.6%) of all residues are also prime in this protein. The proline-rich region is defined as residues 129 to 470 with a ScanProsite high score of 35.18 (Figure 1). The score indicates how well a specific profile, comprised of a weighted matrix, matches that for the domain. The ProtParam tool 12 narrows the proline-rich domain to residues 127 to 136, 142 to 157, and 447 to 467. The microtubule binding region is located towards the N-terminus across residues 1 to 92, featuring a predominantly alpha-helical structure, while much of the outward structure of the protein is highly disordered. Clearly, the highly disordered nature of the protein offers it flexibility in terms of its function and adaption.
Figure 1.
ScanProsite output for proline-rich zinc-finger protein (Uniprot entry O43670).
In the extended proline-rich 129 to 470 region (Figure 1), proline makes up 90 or over one quarter (26.3%) of the 342 residues. Given the backbone constraints imposed by the proline residue, where its side chain is attached back to the nitrogen atom of the backbone, the next most common residue is the structural-alleviating glycine comprising 39 or 11.4% of residues. These residues are well-known to co-locate, particularly in beta-turns.
The next 2 most prime-rich proteins, where the total percentage of primes equals 56.2% and 55.8% are 2 transcriptional regulator forkhead proteins (Uniprot entries P58012 and Q5VYV0). Proline and alanine levels in these proteins are 16.2% and 17.3%, and 15.0% and 14.8%, respectively. Thus every 6th to 7th residue in each protein is either proline or alanine. The proline and alanine rich regions occupy residues 280 to 341 and 221 to 348 with ScanProsite scores of 16.16 and 14.40 respectively (Figure 2). The latter alanine-rich region, in which 41 of 128 or 32.0% of residues are alanine, is also rich in proline (24.2%). Similarly, the proline-rich segment comprising proline at 25 (or 40.3%) of 62 residues is very alanine-rich (29.0%).
Figure 2.
ScanProsite output for proline-rich forkhead proteins (Uniprot entries P58012 and Q5VYV0).
The same 2 prime residues predominate in regions 162 to 214 (ScanProsite score 18.76) and 220 to 261 (ScanProsite score 14.58) for proline and alanine respectively. The former is rich in proline (49.1%) and glutamine (22.6%) while the latter site contains 57.1% alanine.
Both forkhead proteins also are rich in histidine (Figure 2). The former protein (Uniprot entry P58012) contains a short histidine-rich segment comprising residues 116 to 181 (ScanProsite score 9.45) while the latter features a longer histidine-rich segment across residues 116 to 181 with a high ScanProsite of 27.99. This 66 residue peptide segment contains 40.9% histidine, 24.2% proline and 9.1% alanine, totalling almost three quarters (or 74.2%) of all residues.
Discussion
Prime-Rich Protein Functions, Hydrophobic Effects, and Their Role in Cellular Life
Biological events important early in the life cycle feature proteins that play fundamental roles in basic cellular processes such as translation and protein translocation. The prime-rich residues feature heavily among these. A high proportion perform roles in transcription activation, regulation, including the regulation of RNA methylation, and serve as transcription factors (Table 1). Others, such as angiomotin, regulate endothelial cell migration. Several, including the multiple epidermal growth factor-like domain protein, are transmembrane proteins with diverse roles that aid cell adhesion, act as a cell surface receptor, or serve as a surface membrane protein that participates in cytoskeletal protein binding and polymerisation. The resulting filaments and microtubules play a crucial role in cell support and movement, and are vital to normal cell function. In the early stages of life, the creation of transmembrane proteins, which span the cell membrane, and the development of systems that allow for protein translocation across membranes, are all crucial processes.
Hydrophobic effects are important to this organisation. They are responsible for the assembly of cell membranes and intracellular compartments, and the absence of strong attractive hydrophilic and charged forces makes membranes more fluid and deformable. Structures that are less rigid are more suited to the organisation of living matter, where deformability is not only a virtue, but also a necessity. 14 Hydrophobic amino acid residues have been proposed to have predominated in the prebiotic world, before today’s oxygen-rich environment. 15 Ancient protein sequences have been found to be over-represented with hydrophobic residues 16 that tend to cluster together along the protein chain. 17 These help to prevent undesirable aggregation. 18
During protein evolution, amino acids are selectively sequestered based upon their specific physicochemical properties. This leads to an abundance of specific amino acid positions in proteins, especially at sites that are critical to protein function or stability. Natural selection drives this accumulation of particular amino acids. 19
The selection of the 20 standard amino acids into the genetic code was likely driven by a combination of factors, including the ability to form stable proteins with the right folding characteristics20,21 along with the efficiency of biosynthesis and folding. A plot of the codon frequency of each amino acid versus their frequency across all known proteins of the human proteome 4 revealed that the greatest correlation existed for the prime residues. All prime residue values were located along the intersecting (x = y) line, while the polar, hydrophilic acidic and basic non-prime residues were the most diverged from this line. 4 Thus the prime residues appear to maintain their importance during protein expression, irrespective of other evolutionary events.
Hydrophobic residues drive protein folding by expelling water from the core of their structure. 22 Prime residues (alanine, cysteine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, proline, threonine, and tyrosine) are predominantly hydrophobic in nature, and the least hydrophobic residues among them, histidine 23 and proline, are both known to be essential to protein biosynthesis and protein folding. Proline is known to promote beta-turns 24 while disrupting alpha-helices 25 thus driving particular folds at the secondary structural level. It has also been reported that metal-binding (cysteine and histidine) and sulphur-containing (cysteine and methionine) amino acids, all prime residues, were introduced in the genetic code much earlier than previously thought, also to aid protein folding. 26 It has even been proposed that such hydrophobic residues were involved in the development of foldamers 27 in a protein-first model of biology. 28 We have also recently shown in a global study of nearly 16 000 single point substitutions across several hundred disparate proteins, that mutations which retain a prime mass residue are favoured over those that lose them. 29 This suggests they may afford some evolutionary advantage.
Has the Evolution of Proteins, and Their Functions, Been Driven in Part by Their Residues’ Primality?
It is interesting to pose the question as to whether the evolutionary emergence of prime-rich proteins and their functionality can be truly attributable to the primality of residues, or is merely a consequence of the hydrophobicity and/or structural properties of such residues. It is tempting to suggest that prime residues were recruited early into the genetic code, based on studies of the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) proteins, 26 because of their primality alone.
Although there is no definitive consensus, 30 it is generally believed that the evolution of the current genetic code proceeded with a stepwise incorporation of individual amino acids, driven in part by the chemical and biological environment encountered by early life forms. Smaller, simple aliphatic residues, including those containing sulphur, are widely thought to have been produced first. 26 Similar findings were made in a revisited spark-discharge chemistry study conducted under abiotic conditions that attempted to simulate conditions on primordial Earth. 31 Indeed, 5 prime residues (alanine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, and threonine) were among the highest concentration detected in this study. 31 It remains difficult, however, to prove that the primality of residues somehow influenced their recruitment for protein synthesis and impacted protein expression. 32
To be prime, residues must contain an odd number of hydrogen atoms 4 since the major isotopes of all other elements (carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and sulphur) are even. Most are aliphatic and have fewer nitrogen and oxygen atoms in their side chains than their non-prime, odd mass, counterparts. 4 The aliphatic side chains of the 4 prime residues alanine, leucine, isoleucine, and proline all contain only carbon and hydrogen atoms. Two others, cysteine and methionine, contain only 1 atom of sulphur each within their straight aliphatic side chains while threonine contains 1 oxygen atom.
All such carbon-based, aliphatic straight chain or branched side chains contain an odd number of hydrogen atoms, bar proline, and the total number of hydrogen atoms within the repeating amino acid residue structure remains odd when the 2 hydrogen atoms attached to the backbone (at the alpha-carbon and amide nitrogen) are added. In the case of proline, the even number of hydrogen atoms on its cyclic side chain is compensated for in the total by the lack of 1 at the amide nitrogen.
Yet if the proposal that such simple aliphatic residues emerged first were universally true, and was associated with their simple side-chain structures and primality, valine would be expected to be prime. This residue, with a mass of 99, is in fact non-prime. Serine, with a shorter side chain similar in structure and composition to threonine, is also non-prime with a mass of 87.
Various amino acid biochemical pathway scenarios have been proposed 33 to explain the order in which residues have emerged, where most prime residues have been suggested to have predominated in early life forms. 26 However, these pathways vary considerably among species in response to their individual metabolisms, each evolving over time in response to dietary changes. Over evolutionary time, some pathways available to certain organisms are absent in others. 33 It has been noted previously that as many as 6 of the 9 prime mass residues (histidine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, threonine, and even tyrosine) are not synthesised by humans and are therefore essential to our diet today. 4 Histidine is the only prime residue with a side chain containing nitrogen (two) atoms, while tyrosine, like threonine, has 1 oxygen atom on its side chain. While both are aromatic, each preserves an odd number of hydrogen atoms within their side chains by virtue of their chemical construct. Both are important in the binding of metal ions. This likely favoured their proposed early emergence in proteins26,29 over their primality.
Finally, one can consider how the replacement of prime residues with their non-prime counterparts would impact upon a protein’s function. While substituting prime residues alanine or leucine, for instance, with valine is unlikely to have any dramatic effect on a protein’s structure, the substitution of any of the mostly hydrophobic prime residues with a non-prime hydrophilic residue with acidic or basic side chains would have a more dramatic effect.
Our past results suggest that retaining or introducing the more hydrophobic prime residues, and particularly alanine, 29 is favoured in order to maintain or promote protein structural motifs at a local and global level. It is conceivable that the early prevalence of simple hydrophobic aliphatic prime residues, and aromatic primes which bind metal ions such as histidine, all aid in the formation and stability of proteins. The later inclusion of hydrophilic acidic and basic residues promoted additional function but not to a level that would induce significant unfolding and loss of critical structure.
Conclusions
It has been demonstrated that proteins rich in prime residues play an important role in biological events important to cellular life. These prime residues are not exclusively those associated with the highest hydrophobicity, but also those known to be essential to protein biosynthesis and folding including cysteine, histidine and proline. Human proteins have been identified that contain prime residue enrichments of between 40% and 56%; namely up to and exceeding one-half of all residues. In the 3 most prime rich proteins, with enrichments ranging from 54.0% to 56.2%, these residues are found clustered within segments of the protein with high PROSITE scores.
Further, our studies 4 have revealed that within the human proteome there is a strong correlation between the percentage of the prime residues they contain and the codon frequency of such residues, suggesting that prime mass residues are associated with protein encoding genes that maintain their importance during protein translation irrespective of other evolutionary events.
We have considered whether the evolutionary emergence of prime-rich proteins and their functionality can be tied to the primality of the residues, and/or their physicochemical and structural properties in light of the proposed evolutionary history of the amino acids,31-33 where prime residues were recruited early into the genetic code according to the composition the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) proteins. 26 This question remains open and unresolved.
Collectively, this study and our previous work,4,29 promotes the importance of such residues, and the significance of prime numbers in general, in the natural world.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-evb-10.1177_11769343261453240 for Proteins Rich in Prime Mass Residues and Their Role in Cell Biology by Matthew Wright and Kevin M. Downard in Evolutionary Bioinformatics
Acknowledgments
Author Downard thanks Elisabeth Gasteiger of the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics for providing assistance with the use of the ScanProsite tool.
Footnotes
ORCID iD: Kevin M. Downard
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0904-4141
Ethical Considerations: No ethical approval was required for this manuscript.
Author Contributions: K.M.D. conceived and designed the study. M.W. conducted database searches with input from K.M.D. K.M.D. drafted the manuscript and both authors approved it in its final form.
Funding: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Author Downard acknowledges support from the Clinical Research Fund (CRF24) to this study.
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Data Availability Statement: All data used in the study is available and open to all readers in the public domain.
Supplemental Material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.
References
- 1. Simm S, Einloft J, Mirus O, Schleiff E. 50 Years of amino acid hydrophobicity scales: revisiting the capacity for peptide classification. Biol Res. 2016;49:31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Vrdoljak A, Vukičević D. Selector of amino-acid scales set. Math Med Biol. 2024;41:157-168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Breimann S, Kamp F, Steiner H, Frishman D. AAontology: an ontology of amino acid scales for interpretable machine learning. J Mol Biol. 2024;436:168717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Downard KM. Prime mass amino acids: a new numbers based classification of significance to mass spectrometry and protein biology. Eur J Mass Spectrom. 2025;31:73-78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Danesi M, ed. Prime numbers: the DNA of mathematics. In: Pythagoras’ Legacy: Mathematics in Ten Great Ideas. Ch. 2. Oxford Academic Books; 2020:22-36. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Folming M. Prime numbers and atomic structure: a pattern revealed. Quantastic J. Published online 2024. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://medium.com/the-quantastic-journal/prime-numbers-pattern-77f96921c85b
- 7. Crandall R, Pomerance C, eds. The ubiquity of prime numbers. In: Prime Numbers: A Computational Perspective. Ch. 8. Springer; 2025: 387-442. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Curtis M, Tularam GA. The importance of numbers and the need to study primes: the Prime Questions. J Math Stat. 2011;7:262-269. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Loconsole M, Regolin L. Are prime numbers special? Insights from the life sciences. Biol Direct. 2022;17:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hulo N, Bairoch A, Bulliard V, et al. The 20 years of PROSITE. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:D245-D249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Sigrist CJ, De Castro E, Langendijk-Genevaux PS, Le Saux V, Bairoch A, Hulo N. ProRule: a new database containing functional and structural information on PROSITE profiles. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:4060-4066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, et al. Protein identification and analysis tools on the Expasy Server. In: Walker JM, ed. The Proteomics Protocols Handbook. Humana Press; 2005:571-607. [Google Scholar]
- 13. de Castro E, Sigrist CJ, Gattiker A, et al. ScanProsite: detection of PROSITE signature matches and ProRule-associated functional and structural residues in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:W362-W365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Tanford C. The hydrophobic effect and the organization of living matter. Science. 1978;200(4345):1012-1018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ring D, Wolman Y, Friedmann N, Miller SL. Prebiotic synthesis of hydrophobic and protein amino acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1972;69:765-768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. James JE, Willis SM, Nelson PG, Weibel C, Kosinski LJ, Masel J. Universal and taxon-specific trends in protein sequences as a function of age. eLife. 2021;10:e57347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Irbäck A, Peterson C, Potthast F. Evidence for non-random hydrophobicity structures in protein chains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:9533-9538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Foy SG, Wilson BA, Bertram J, Cordes MHJ, Masel J. A shift in aggregation avoidance strategy marks a long-term direction to protein evolution. Genetics. 2019;211:1345-1355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Mularoni L, Ledda A, Toll-Riera M, Albà MM. Natural selection drives the accumulation of amino acid tandem repeats in human proteins. Genome Res. 2010;20:745-754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Brooks DJ, Fresco JR, Lesk AM, Singh M. Evolution of amino acid frequencies in proteins over deep time: inferred order of introduction of amino acids into the genetic code. Mol Biol Evol. 2002;19:1645-1655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Makarov M, Sanchez Rocha AC, Krystufek R, et al. Early selection of the amino acid alphabet was adaptively shaped by biophysical constraints of foldability. J Am Chem Soc. 2023;145:5320-5329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Pace CN, Fu H, Fryar KL, et al. Contribution of hydrophobic interactions to protein stability. J Mol Biol. 2011;408:514-528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Sun Y, Li C, Wang J, Shi H. The effect of histidine behaviors on the structural properties of aβ(1–42) peptide in protonation stage one, two, and three. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2023;25:18346-18353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ananthanarayanan VS, Brahmachari SK, Pattabiraman N. Proline-containing beta-turns in peptides and proteins: analysis of structural data on globular proteins. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1984;232:482-495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Nilsson I, Sääf A, Whitley P, Gafvelin G, Waller C, von Heijne G. Proline-induced disruption of a transmembrane alpha-helix in its natural environment. J Mol Biol. 1998;284: 1165-1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Wehbi S, Wheeler A, Morel B, et al. Order of amino acid recruitment into the genetic code resolved by last universal common ancestor’s protein domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2024;121:e2410311121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Guseva E, Zuckermann RN, Dill KA. Foldamer hypothesis for the growth and sequence differentiation of prebiotic polymers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:E7460-E7468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kocher C, Dill KA. Origins of life: first came evolutionary dynamics. QRB Discov. 2023;4:e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Wright M, Downard KM. Prevalence of prime mass residues in single point mutations and their importance to protein stability, function and evolution. Biosystems. 2025;258: 105638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Gutiérrez-Preciado A, Romero H, Peimbert M. An evolutionary perspective on amino acids. Nat Educ. 2010;3:29. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Parker ET, Cleaves HJ, Dworkin JP, et al. Primordial synthesis of amines and amino acids in a 1958 Miller H2S-rich spark discharge experiment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108:5526-5531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Thompson R, Pickard BS. The amino acid composition of a protein influences its expression. PLoS One. 2024;19: e0284234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Kirschning A. On the evolutionary history of the twenty encoded amino acids. Chemistry. 2022;28:e202201419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-evb-10.1177_11769343261453240 for Proteins Rich in Prime Mass Residues and Their Role in Cell Biology by Matthew Wright and Kevin M. Downard in Evolutionary Bioinformatics


