Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine logoLink to Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine
. 1979 Apr;43(2):211–216.

The sensitivity of some avian viruses to formaldehyde fumigation.

P R Ide
PMCID: PMC1319920  PMID: 574054

Abstract

Various avian viruses (infectious bursal agent, reovirus, adenovirus, infectious bronchitis, Newcastle disease, poxvirus, avian encephalomyelitis and infectious laryngotracheitis virus) as suspensions in buffer or in a litter slurry were exposed to aerosolized formalin in an attempt to determine the efficacy of this fumigation method for decontamination of laboratory isolation cubicles. Formalin (37% formaldehyde) was delivered by a commercial insecticide fogger at a flow rate of 40 ml per minute and a volume of 36 ml per cubic meter of space. Fumigated cubicles were left sealed for 18 hr (cycle 1) before viruses were sampled, or were then exposed to a second fumigation and left sealed for an additional six hour period (cycle 2) before viruses were titrated (commencing at a 1:10 dilution) for residual infectivity. Although the infectivity of all viruses was reduced by over 99% by one fumigation cycle, the second cycle was necessary for reduction of Newcastle disease and reoviruses to non-detectable (no infectivity demonstrated in a 1:10 dilution of fumigated virus) levels.

Full text

PDF
216

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Calnek B. W., Hitchner S. B. Survival and disinfection of Marek's disease virus and the effectiveness of filters in preventing airborne dissemination. Poult Sci. 1973 Jan;52(1):35–43. doi: 10.3382/ps.0520035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Deshmukh D. R., Pomeroy B. S. Avian reoviruses II. Physicochemical characterization and classification. Avian Dis. 1969 May;13(2):243–251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Evans M., Dingle J. G. Efficiency of formaldehyde fumigation in three types of hatchery incubator. Aust Vet J. 1973 Jul;49(7):354–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1973.tb06831.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Furuta K., Sato S., Kawamura H. Effect of formaldehyde on disinfection of filtered air under positive pressure (FAPP) type house. Poult Sci. 1976 Nov;55(6):2295–2299. doi: 10.3382/ps.0552295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. PATTISON I. H. RESISTANCE OF THE SCRAPIE AGENT TO FORMALIN. J Comp Pathol. 1965 Apr;75:159–164. doi: 10.1016/0021-9975(65)90006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Scarlett C. M., Mathewson G. K. Terminal disinfection of calf houses by formaldehyde fumigation. Vet Rec. 1977 Jul 2;101(1):7–10. doi: 10.1136/vr.101.1.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine are provided here courtesy of Canadian Veterinary Medical Association

RESOURCES