Skip to main content
Brain Sciences logoLink to Brain Sciences
. 2026 May 1;16(5):499. doi: 10.3390/brainsci16050499

Calcium and Ca2+-Binding Proteins Regulate Microtubule and Cytoskeletal Dynamics During Mammalian Corticogenesis

Diana Sarahi De la Merced-García 1,2, Rocío Valle-Bautista 1, Rebeca Hernández-García 1,3, Néstor Fabián Díaz 1, Anayansi Molina-Hernández 1,*
Editor: Alfredo Bellon
PMCID: PMC13204136  PMID: 42192812

Abstract

Intracellular calcium (Ca2+) signaling is a central regulator of corticogenesis, governing haveneural stem cell behavior, fate transitions, neuronal migration, and circuit assembly. Beyond its canonical role as a second messenger, Ca2+ shapes cytoskeletal organization by modulating microtubule dynamics essential for mitotic spindle function, radial glial scaffold, nucleokinesis, and neurite extension. This review synthesizes evidence from in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro studies to delineate Ca2+-dependent pathways and Ca2+-binding proteins that couple, within restricted Ca2+ microdomains in space and time, to microtubule regulation during mammalian cortical development. We highlight mechanistic nodes involving calmodulin, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinases (CaMKs), S100 proteins, cadherins/protocadherins, centrins (CENs), and Ca2+ sensors such as STIM1 and calneurons, which collectively coordinate spindle orientation, progenitor division modes, radial migration, and neurite outgrowth. Finally, we discuss how perturbations in Ca2+-controlled cytoskeletal programs may contribute to abnormal cortical cytoarchitecture and neurodevelopmental disease. By integrating Ca2+ microdomain transients with microtubule control modules, this review provides a unified framework for understanding how Ca2+ orchestrates key cellular events during mammalian corticogenesis and propose that Ca2+ oscillatory codes are translated into direct or indirect microtubule/cytoskeletal remodeling transitions that determine neural stem cell fate, migration, and maturation, to accurately establish cortical architecture and function.

Keywords: calcium signaling, corticogenesis, microtubules, neural stem cell proliferation, neuronal migration, neurite growth

1. Introduction

Corticogenesis is a tightly regulated process that encompasses proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells (NSCs), neuronal migration, and the establishment of the laminated architecture of the cerebral cortex. During early neural tube development, neuroepithelial cells (NECs) undergo symmetric divisions to expand the NSC pool. As development progresses, NECs acquire a radial glial cell (RGC) identity, retaining self-renewal and multilineage differentiation capacity, and provide a scaffold to guide neuroblast migration towards the developing cortical plate [1].

Intracellular calcium (Ca2+) is a key regulator of NSC proliferation and fate decision during cortical development. In early corticogenesis, Ca2+ signaling modulates RGC polarity, proliferation, differentiation, and neuroblast migration. Ca2+ signaling displays spatiotemporal oscillatory patterns that trigger distinct cellular responses, including cell cycle progression, differentiation, neuronal migration, and maturation [2,3].

In non-excitable cells, such as RGCs, a prominent mechanism driving cytosolic Ca2+ elevation is activation of Gαq11 by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). This pathway involves activation of phospholipase C (PLC), which hydrolyzes phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate into inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG). IP3 binds to its receptors (IP3Rs) on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), triggering Ca2+ release from the ER lumen into the cytosol, promoting additional Ca2+ entry and the activation of downstream intracellular pathways (Figure 1A) [4,5].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

G-protein-coupled-receptor-dependent Ca2+ entry and Ca2+ transient patterns in neural stem cells. (A) Downstream signaling after agonist binding to a Gαq/11-coupled G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). GPCR activation stimulates phospholipase C (PLC), generating IP3 and DAG, triggering Ca2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) via IP3 receptors, which further promotes Ca2+ influx through transient receptor potential canonical (TRPC) and Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ (CRAC; ORAI) channels. Elevated Ca2+ engages Ca2+-binding proteins (CaBPs) that regulate cytoskeletal dynamics. (B–D) Representative patterns of spontaneous Ca2+ transients observed in cortical neuroepithelium/radial glia and their related pathways: (B) slow, sporadic, unsynchronized oscillations involving Ca2+/calmodulin (CaM), Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinases (CaMKs), cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) for growing phase 1 (G1) to synthesis (S) and for growing phase 2 (G2) to mitosis/cytokinesis (M) transitions; (C) synchronous Ca2+ increase between dividing sister cells involving CaM and Aurora kinase A (AURKA); and (D) multicellular Ca2+ waves propagated through gap junctions through time (t). For (B–D), the upper traces depict representative Ca2+ transients, and cell color indicates relative intracellular Ca2+ levels (yellow, elevated; blue, low). Created in https://BioRender.com/aiiw8bj (accessed on 18 April 2026).

Studies in rat embryonic cortical neuroepithelium have described three patterns of spontaneous Ca2+ activity in RGCs that depend on ER Ca2+ release mediated by IP3Rs, extracellular Ca2+ influx via transient receptor potential channels (TRPC), and Ca2+ influx through Ca2+-release-activated calcium (CRAC) channels. The first pattern comprises slow (~40 s), sporadic, and unsynchronized oscillations at the single-cell level, which have been linked to G1–S or G2–M transitions (Figure 1B) [6,7]. Experimental evidence indicates that slow Ca2+ oscillations are associated with cell-cycle progression and are likely decoded by Ca2+-dependent regulators, such as calmodulin (CaM) and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinases (CaMKs), which can modulate cyclin-dependent programs and key cell-cycle transitions [8]. A second pattern consists of synchronous Ca2+ increases between dividing sister cells, suggesting a potential role in mitotic spindle orientation or cytokinesis (Figure 1C) [6]. In this context, coordinated Ca2+ transients are compatible with activation of spindle-regulatory machinery, including Aurora-A kinase (AURKA) and centrosome-associated components, which are influenced by Ca2+/CaM signaling and are required for correct spindle organization and mitotic progression [9]. A third pattern involves multicellular Ca2+ events mediated by intracellular wave propagation through gap junctions (Figure 1D). These multicellular waves have been proposed to promote NSC synchronization within the ventricular zone (VZ), likely via intercellular coupling mechanisms that coordinate proliferation and early neurogenesis [7,10,11]. Although the precise decoding modules are not fully defined in these paradigms, the available data support a framework in which distinct spatiotemporal Ca2+ signatures engage specific molecular pathways controlling cell-cycle progression, spindle behavior, and progenitor coordination during corticogenesis.

These phenomena reflect a structured spatial organization in which Ca2+ operates within signaling microdomains composed of effectors, regulators, and substrates, assembled by scaffolding/anchoring proteins. Ca2+ binds directly to a broad range of proteins, including those that regulate Ca2+ dynamics (pumps, channels, and buffer proteins) and those that mediate downstream processes such as enzymatic activation, cytoskeletal remodeling, and transcriptional control. The specificity of Ca2+ signaling during corticogenesis is therefore determined by signal duration, amplitude, oscillation frequency, spatial localization, and timing [12].

This review focuses on the mechanisms by which Ca2+ signaling regulates microtubule dynamics during mammalian corticogenesis, emphasizing its roles in NSC division, neuronal migration, and neurite outgrowth. We further examine how distinct Ca2+ oscillation features (frequency, amplitude, and spatial confinement with microdomains) may be decoded by Ca2+-binding proteins (CaBPs) to modulate microtubule stability and remodeling across successive stages of cortical development, from progenitor proliferation and neuronal differentiation to migration and neurite maturation.

It is important to note that other ions, including Na+, K+, and Cl−, as well as divalent cations such as Mg2+ and Zn2+, also contribute to neurodevelopmental processes. Monovalent ions regulate membrane excitability, osmotic balance, and aspects of stem cell physiology [13]. Mg2+ has been implicated in oligodendrocyte differentiation, in part through modulation of NMDA receptor function [14]. Zn2+ influences proliferation, survival, migration, and differentiation by regulating enzyme activity, transcription factor binding, and chromatin/DNA stability [15]. However, in contrast to these ions, Ca2+ functions as a uniquely versatile second messenger that encodes information through spatiotemporal dynamics, coupling extracellular and intracellular cues to signaling pathways that control cytoskeletal organization, gene expression, and cell-fate decisions in the developing cerebral cortex.

2. Ca2+-Binding Protein

During corticogenesis, the cytoskeleton is fundamental to proliferation, differentiation, migration, and neuronal maturation. Within the cytoskeleton, microtubules (MTs) are highly dynamic polymers whose regulated assembly and disassembly support these processes. The effect of Ca2+ on cytoskeleton polymerization/depolymerization depends on local concentration, the repertoire of CaBPs expressed, and the organization of subcellular Ca2+ microdomains [16,17,18,19].

CaBPs implicated in cytoskeletal and MT organization during neurodevelopment include CaM, Ca2+/CaM-dependent kinases (CaMKs), S100 proteins, parvalbumin, CEN, calbindin-D28k, gelsolin, neurocalcin, calcineurin (CaN), and annexins [19]. Key examples are summarized below.

2.1. CaM and CaMKs

CaM is the most abundant and best-characterized Ca2+ sensor in eukaryotic cells. It regulates processes such as growth, differentiation, proliferation, survival, and motility by modulating numerous enzymes, ion channels, and cytosolic-, nuclear-, and membrane-associated proteins [20].

In mammals, CaM is encoded by three genes (CAM1, CAM2, and CAM3) located on different chromosomes, which encode the same 149-amino-acid protein [20,21]. Structurally, CaM adopts a dumbbell-shaped conformation with N- and C-terminal globular domains connected by a central α-helix. Each globular domain contains two EF-hand motifs, enabling CaM to bind four Ca2+ ions [22].

CaM constitutes at least 0.1% of total cellular proteins (10−6–10−5 M), and its abundance is often higher in dividing and differentiating cells such as NSCs. CaM function is regulated through three main mechanisms: (1) its subcellular localization (cytoplasmic vs. nuclear) that enables compartment-specific effects; (2) its interaction with >300 target proteins, which is facilitated by Ca2+-dependent conformational changes that expose a hydrophobic binding surface; and (3) changes in affinity concentrations (from 5 × 10−7 to 5 × 10−6 M), with the C-terminal site exhibiting 3–5 times higher affinity than the N-terminal site [23].

Among the most prominent CaM effectors are CaMK family members, which exert major control over cytoskeletal dynamics. The family includes CaMKI, CaMKII, CaMKIII, and CaMKIV. Where CaMKIII primarily phosphorylates eEF2, other isoforms phosphorylate diverse substrates involved in cell morphology and plasticity [24,25]. The CaMKIIβ subunit directly interacts with filamentous actin (F-actin). Upon Ca2+ influx, CaMKII activation promotes a transient actin reorganization followed by return to an autoinhibited state, which can stabilize newly established cytoskeletal architecture. Although CaMKII is classically associated with actin, it also modulates microtubule-associated proteins, supporting coordinated regulation of both cytoskeletal systems [26,27].

2.2. S100 Proteins

The S100 family includes CaBPs, with two EF-hand motifs connected by a hinge region, enabling conformational transduction upon ion binding. The family includes 25 functional members, with intracellular and extracellular functions. S100 proteins are vertebrate-specific and display cell-type- and developmental-stage-specific expression, often at high abundance. Among its target proteins are enzymes, cytoskeletal components, receptors, transcription factors, and nucleic acids [28,29,30].

During corticogenesis, S100 proteins contribute to cell proliferation, differentiation, cell morphology, and migration. Among CNS-expressed family members, S100B and S100A4 are prominent during development. S100B has been implicated in regulating protein phosphorylation, energy metabolism, and cytoskeletal dynamics, thereby influencing cell morphology and behavior [31,32]. During corticogenesis, it is highly expressed in proliferative RGCs during neurogenesis and early differentiation, decreases during neuronal precursor differentiation, and later re-emerges in glial precursors, reaching the highest levels in astrocytes [33,34]. It has been reported that S100B can regulate microtubule dynamics both directly and indirectly: directly by promoting Ca2+-dependent microtubule disassembly, and indirectly by modulating protein-kinase-II-dependent phosphorylation of tau, a key microtubule-associated protein [35,36]. In human NSCs, S100B has been proposed to promote tau hyperphosphorylation via JNK signaling, thereby activating nuclear AP-1/c-Jun-dependent transcription. In this context, JNK activation has also been linked to increased expression of Dickopff-1, which promotes glycogen synthase kinase 3β activity and β-catenin degradation, ultimately reducing tau affinity for MTs and contributing to cytoskeletal destabilization [37]. However, direct experimental evidence connecting S100B to microtubule regulation, specifically in NSC division, polarity, or ventricular zone dynamics, remains limited. Future studies should therefore test whether developmental shifts in S100B expression (high-to-low) interact with Ca2+ signaling dynamics to differentially tune MT stability during proliferative and migratory stages, when rapid remodeling is required, versus more differentiated states, where neuronal morphology is comparatively stabilized.

S100A4, also known as metastasin or fibroblast-specific protein 1, is expressed in multiple CNS cell types during development, including neurons and RGCs [38]. In the adult CNS, S100A4 expression is generally low and has been associated with migratory behavior and cytoskeletal reorganization through interactions with actin filaments, tropomodulins, tropomyosins, liprin β1, and ezrin. Many of these interactions are Ca2+-dependent, although Ca2+-independent interactions have also been reported [39]. Functional information on S100A4 in corticogenesis remains scarce. Similar to S100B, S100A4 exhibits a prenatal spatiotemporal expression pattern, reported prominently in the human hippocampus and temporal cortex, and declines with age [40]. Notably, other S100 family members, such as S100A5 and S100A13, are expressed at higher levels in the developing brain [40], but their roles during corticogenesis remain largely unknown.

Exogenous S100A4 administration to neuron–astrocyte co-cultures has been reported to enhance neurite outgrowth and promote survival following apoptotic challenge in hippocampal, dopaminergic, and cerebellar neurons, in a RAGE-independent manner [41,42]. These findings suggest potential involvement of S100A4 in neuritogenesis during development; however, the contribution of extracellular Ca2+, the mechanisms governing S100A4 release from specific cell types, and whether S100A4 directly regulates cytoskeletal dynamics or fate decisions during corticogenesis remain unresolved. Collectively, these gaps highlight clear priorities for future mechanistic studies.

2.3. Cadherins

Cadherins are Ca2+-dependent cell–cell adhesion molecules with five repeated extracellular cadherin domains (EC), a single transmembrane domain, and a C-terminal cytoplasmic domain [43]. They are broadly classified into classical cadherins, clustered protocadherins, and non-clustered protocadherins [44]. Protocadherin 19 (PCDH19) is a protocadherin superfamily member characterized by a conserved 17-amino acid cytoplasmic motif. In mammals, PCDH19 is X-linked and encodes a transmembrane protein with four extracellular cadherin repeats (EC1–EC4), a transmembrane segment, two cytoplasmic domains, and at least one nuclear localization signal [45,46].

PCDH19 EC1–EC4 domains adopt the canonical cadherin fold, including a “Greek key”-like motif composed of β-sheets forming a sandwich-like structure. The EC1 domain includes a disulfide bridge characteristic of clustered protocadherins and an α-helix in the B–C loop. Linker regions between EC1–EC2, EC2–EC3, and EC3–EC4 contain canonical Ca2+-binding sites critical for structural stability. This architecture supports Ca2+-dependent adhesion consistent with the roles of neuronal column organization reported in the zebrafish optic tectum, suggesting it may also participate in columnar neuron organization in cortical development [47].

Pcdh19 is expressed in both the developing and adult brain [46,48,49]. During corticogenesis, its expression initiates in NECs and expands across the neuroepithelium at the onset of neurogenesis. At the neurogenic peak, Pcdh19 is enriched in RGCs and intermediate progenitors (IPs), two proliferative cell populations: the former is multipotent, and the latter is largely neuron-restricted [50]. Intracellular Ca2+ transients enable Pcdh19 to regulate cell–cell contacts within the neuroepithelium. Proteomic studies further indicate that Pcdh19 interacts with proteins implicated in microtubule architecture, cell polarity, chromatid segregation, and the G2/M transition, supporting a model in which Pcdh19 coordinates, in a Ca2+-dependent manner, actin and microtubule dynamics to ensure proper NSCs division, migration, and differentiation during corticogenesis [51].

Cadherin-mediated adhesion interfaces with Rho family GTPases, including RhoA, RAC1, and CDC42, which coordinate actin and microtubule remodeling and are essential for establishing apico–basal polarity [52]. Importantly, cadherin-based junctions can also recruit polarity and spindle-orientation machinery, such as the LGN/NuMA complex, thereby coupling extracellular adhesion cues to centrosome positioning and mitotic spindle alignment and influencing the balance between symmetric proliferative and asymmetric neurogenic division [53,54]. Although direct evidence linking Ca2+-dependent adhesion mediated specifically by PCDH19 to spindle orientation in RGCs remains limited, these observations support a framework in which Ca2+-regulated cell–cell adhesion is transduced into intracellular polarity signals that shape cytoskeletal organization and division orientation during corticogenesis.

2.4. Centrins

CENs (caltractins) are small acidic phosphoproteins (~170 amino acids). Mammals encode four isoforms (CEN1–CEN4). CENs are CaM-like with N- and C-terminal globular domains, connected by a flexible hinge that yields a dumbbell-like conformation. They contain four EF-hand motifs, from which typically EF-3 and EF-4 are active. Ca2+ binding induces conformational rearrangements that expose hydrophobic surfaces, facilitating dimerization, oligomerization, and interactions with signaling and cytoskeletal proteins. The flexible N-terminal region (notably in CEN2) contributes to Ca2+-dependent self-assembly [55].

In various cell types, including NSCs, CENs associate with centrioles, key components of the centrosome. CEN1 is primarily expressed in male germ cells, whereas CEN2–CEN4 are broadly expressed in somatic cells. CEN2 localizes to centrioles throughout the cell cycle, whereas CEN3 is enriched in the pericentriolar material. During mitosis, CEN associates with the centrosome, a key structure that organizes the cytoskeleton, to serve as a nucleation and anchoring site for MTs. The centrosome comprises a centriole pair and pericentriolar material containing γ-tubulin (γ-Tub), pericentrin, and ninein [56,57,58,59,60].

3. Ca2+-Binding Proteins and Cortical Development

3.1. Proliferation–Differentiation

During corticogenesis, NSCs/progenitor cells proliferate predominantly in the ventricular zone and subventricular zone, where RGCs and intermediate progenitors expand the progenitor pool and generate neuronal and glial lineages. These germinal zones provide the architectural and signaling milieu that supports cortical growth, regional patterning, and lamination [1].

During neurogenesis, NSCs transition from symmetric proliferative divisions to asymmetric neurogenic divisions, which is a process that depends on mitotic spindle reorientation [61]. Symmetric divisions are commonly associated with a spindle oriented perpendicular to the ventricular surface, whereas asymmetric divisions often exhibit oblique or parallel orientations, resulting in differential inheritance of fate determinants [62]. This transition is accompanied by remodeling of microtubule morphology and spindle architecture (Figure 2) [62,63].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Calcium/calmodulin-dependent regulation in neural stem cells’ cell cycle. (A) Schematic representation of symmetric (left) and asymmetric (right) divisions of neural stem cells (NSCs) in the developing cortex, which promote renewal and neuron (N) differentiation directly or through intermediate progenitors (IP), respectively. Dotted line indicates the division plane according to the ventricular surface and arrows the resulting cell type (B) The symmetric (left) and asymmetric (right) division patterns are accompanied by remodeling of microtubule organization and spindle architecture in a Ca2+/calmodulin (CaM)-dependent manner by the activation of aurora kinase A (AURKA). Green dots represent specific Ca2+ domains that depend on the NSCs division pattern to determine microtubule density and stability (denser and more stable MTs in asymmetric proliferation). (C) Dynamic changes in calmodulin (CaM) levels across the cell cycle. CaM abundance increases progressively from G1 through S to G2/M, peaking during mitosis. Created in https://BioRender.com/aiiw8bj (accessed on 18 April 2006).

Across the cell cycle, the centrosome plays a central role in microtubule nucleation [64]. The centrosome duplicates during interphase, matures through recruiting γ-Tub ring complexes, and increases its microtubule-nucleation capacity [65,66]. Duplicated centrosomes then migrate to opposite poles and reorganize the interphase microtubule array into a bipolar mitotic spindle, enabling accurate chromosome alignment and segregation [67,68].

Microtubule architecture differs between the proliferative and differentiative NSC states. In early corticogenesis, abundant astral MTs support vertical divisions and proper positioning of daughter cells. During differentiation, spindle density increases and spindles more frequently adopt orientation and structural asymmetries associated with fate diversification (Figure 2A) [63,69].

Multiple studies suggest that rises in intracellular Ca2+ contribute to the functional regulation of the mitotic spindle. Classic work dating to the 1980s reported that elevated Ca2+ promotes microtubule depolymerization, leading to the hypothesis that Ca2+ remains relatively low during prophase to spindle assembly. At late metaphase and/or the onset of anaphase, a rise in Ca2+ concentration triggers the microtubule depolymerization necessary for chromosome segregation. In PtK-1 cells, the microinjection of Ca2+ (1–10 pM) during metaphase was reported to accelerate entry into anaphase, whereas EGTA microinjection, a Ca2+ chelator, blocked the metaphase-to-anaphase transition [70,71].

CaM abundance has been reported to increase from G1 through S to G2/M, with total protein levels rising across the cell cycle [72]. In mouse C127 cells, transient CaM elevation accelerated proliferation, whereas CaM reduction via antisense approaches induced transient cell cycle arrest, indicating that both G1 progression and mitosis are sensitive to CaM levels [8] and suggesting that CaM can be rate-limiting for cell-cycle progression under basal growth conditions and may be particularly influential at the G1-to-S transition (Figure 2B).

In HeLa cells, CaM localizes to the centrioles and the cytokinetic furrow, and its inhibition with W7 disrupts spindle organization [73,74]. CaM has also been reported to increase microtubule sensitivity to Ca2+-induced depolymerization, potentially via interactions with spindle-associated proteins, including a 52 kDa CaM-binding protein that colocalizes with CaM during mitosis in multiple cell lines [75]. The spindle disruption induced by W7 indicates that CaM activity is required for mitotic progression and supports the idea that, in the absence of Ca2+/CaM signaling, cells fail to transit from a disorganized microtubule to a functional bipolar spindle.

The Ca2+/CaM complex also regulates Aurora-A kinase (AURKA), which is implicated in both primary cilia disassembly and mitotic spindle functions. Disruption of the CaM–AURKA interaction compromises mitotic progression and cytokinesis, whereas mutation of CaM prevents its binding to AURKA, leading to defects in both processes (Figure 2C) [9].

Although many fundamental studies were performed in non-neural cell lines (e.g., PtK-1, HeLa), they established core principles regarding the Ca2+-dependence of microtubule dynamics and cell cycle transitions. Subsequent work in NSCs supports conservation of these mechanisms and highlights their relevance to corticogenesis.

It has been suggested that PCDH19 contributes to cell-cycle regulation during corticogenesis. PCDH19 is highly expressed in NSCs, and its silencing in vitro and in vivo induces aberrant spindle orientation and premature neurogenesis, consistent with a role in the temporal control of cell differentiation [47,76]. In zebrafish, loss of pcdh19 increases cell proliferation and neuronal production in the optic tectum [47]. Emond and colleagues (2021) performed a proteomic analysis to define the interactome of zebrafish pcdh19 following heterogenous expression in HEK293 cells. GO enrichments highlighted Cytoskeletal Protein Binding (Molecular Function), Microtubule Cytoskeleton (Cellular Component), and Establishment of Cell Polarity (Biological Process) as the most prominent categories. Within the “Microtubule Cytoskeleton” term, the authors identified Pcdh19-interacting proteins expressed in neural precursors and implicated in cell-division control. They further validated the interaction between Pcdh19 and neural precursor cell-expressed developmentally down-regulated protein 1 (NEDD1) in HEK293 cells, motivated by a priori evidence linking NEDD1 to proliferation, apoptosis, neural tube morphogenesis in zebrafish, and chromosomal microtubule nucleation and spindle function downstream of AURKA signaling in HeLa cells [77,78].

In the developing mouse brain, Pcdh19 loss does not produce gross morphological defects as in zebrafish; instead, an apparent increase in neuronal migration has been reported [48], suggesting partial functional compensation by other protocadherins. The role of PCDH19 in migration is discussed below.

Direct experimental evidence is still required to delineate the functional relationship between Ca2+ transients and PCHD19 in the proliferation and fate allocation of cortical NSCs. In particular, cortical lamination abnormalities and shifts in layer-specific neuronal phenotypes could reflect deregulation of symmetric versus asymmetric division, an aspect not fully resolved in Pcdh19 knockout mice, in part because comprehensive layer–marker analyses were not performed. Moreover, systematic testing of additional candidate interactors identified by Emond and colleagues, especially proteins implicated in centrosome function, mitotic spindle assembly, and cytokinesis, such as CDK5RAP2, PLK1, PRC1, RACGAP1, and ARHGEF2, would help determine whether Ca2+ acts directly through PCDH19-dependent adhesion/signaling or indirectly via downstream pathways to regulate NSC proliferation and differentiation. Such analyses would also clarify whether Rho GTPase signaling, as proposed by this group, represents a key mechanism between PCDH19 and cytoskeletal control during corticogenesis [51].

Evidence also supports a role for CENs in NSCs/RGCs symmetry versus asymmetric division. CEN2 is required for centriole formation during S phase and for the formation of Ca2+-sensitive fibers linking mother and daughter centrioles. Changes in Ca2+ levels can trigger contraction or reorganization of these fibers, facilitating centrosome maturation before asymmetric division. Disruption of Ca2+-dependent CENs function impairs centriole duplication, promoting cell cycle arrest and/or genomic instability. Notably, while CEN2 is centrosome-associated in proliferating NSCs, its expression changes upon differentiation, with selective expression in subsets of mature astrocytes and broader cytoplasmic distribution. Hence, CEN2 has been reported in adult human brains, where it is expressed in a large fraction of astrocytes, but not in murine tissues, where it is largely restricted to ependymal cells, suggesting potential species differences and proposing CEN2 as a candidate astrocyte marker in human health and disease [79].

Furthermore, a study using a photoconvertible fluorescent protein fused to CEN1 reported that, in RGCs, mother centrosomes are preferentially inherited by self-renewing RGCs that remain in the VZ. In contrast, the daughter centrosomes are more frequently inherited by differentiating progeny that migrate away from the VZ toward the cortical plate [80].

Together, these findings suggest that centrosome inheritance is tightly regulated and coupled to fate specification during asymmetric division of NSCs in the developing neocortex. In humans, differential expression of CEN isoforms (e.g., CEN1 vs. CEN2) may further be associated with lineage allocation toward neuronal versus astroglial differentiation and maintenance.

3.2. Neuronal Migration

During corticogenesis, neuronal migration begins with the displacement of early-born neuroblasts from the VZ toward the pial surface along RGC scaffolds, which is a process regulated in part by reelin [81]. Migration entails coordinated morphological transitions driven by cytoskeletal remodeling. Neuroblasts initially adopt a multipolar morphology, extending and retracting multiple neurites until they become bipolar, with a leading process that engages the RGC fiber and a trailing process that accompanies soma translocation during radial migration. Upon reaching the appropriate cortical layer, neurons undergo terminal translocation, in which the soma advances, and the cell detaches from the RGC scaffold, thereby consolidating neuronal polarity and converting the leading process into an apical dendrite [82].

Although numerous intracellular CaBPs directly regulate the cytoskeleton during migration, this section emphasizes plasma membrane-associated Ca2+-dependent adhesion and signaling mechanisms that mediate neuroblasts-RGCs interactions. Ca2+ actively participates in neuronal migration during the early corticogenesis in mice (E10.5–E14.5). Using ex vivo anterior brain slices, the genetically encoded Ca2+ indicator GCaMP5G, and two-photon microscopy, Ca2+ transients have been reported to propagate bidirectionally along RGC fibers, suggesting Ca2+-mediated communication across the VZ, the intermediate zone, and the pial surface. Moreover, the amplitude and frequency of Ca2+ activity provide positional information that contributes to appropriate laminar allocation. In this framework, a “honeycomb” model has been proposed in which coordinated activity across RGCs assembles support for the columnar organization of the cerebral cortex (Figure 3) [10].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Ca2+-regulated radial glial coordination and neuron polarity during neuronal migration. Schematic representation of the coordinated activity of radial glial cells (RGCs) that guides neuronal migration during cortical development. RGCs extend long radial processes from the apical to the basal surface, forming a scaffold along which newborn neurons migrate. (A) At the apical and basal surfaces, extracellular signals, such as the reelin gradient, contribute to neural positioning. At the apical surface, RGCs are interconnected through Cadh-containing adherent junctions (N-Cadh/Pcdh19) that maintain epithelial integrity. Migrating neurons initially exhibit a multipolar morphology, then transition to a bipolar morphology and attach to RGC fibers to facilitate locomotion. (B) Groups of RGCs operate in coordinated clusters, forming functional microdomains consistent with the proposed “honeycomb” organization of the developing cortex. Within these radial units, intracellular Ca2+ signals propagate along radial glial processes, synchronizing their activity. (C) The reelin pathway through Rap1 and N-Cadh promotes multipolar neurons. Subsequently, its inactivation, due to degradation of phosphorylated Dab1 or inactivation of reelin receptors, decreases N-Cadh via the Rab7 pathway for bipolar morphology. Yellow arrows indicate the direction of the Ca2+ transient. Created in https://BioRender.com/aiiw8bj (accessed on 18 April 2026).

RGC polarity and scaffold integrity depend in part on cadherin-mediated adhesion that is intrinsically Ca2+-dependent. Binding extracellular Ca2+ to specific sites with cadherin ectodomains stabilizes an extended, rigid conformation required for homophilic adhesion between adjacent cells; in the absence of Ca2+, these regions collapse, compromising adhesive function. In COS cells, fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements have shown that Ca2+ stabilizes N-cadherin (N-Cadh) interactions, thereby promoting robust intercellular adhesion. In contrast, lowering extracellular Ca2+ significantly weakens these interactions, underscoring the Ca2-dependent nature of N-Cadh-mediated adhesion (Figure 3) [83].

During neuronal differentiation, neuroblasts extend immature neurites, and suppressing N-Cadh impairs this outgrowth, indicating a requirement for early morphogenesis. Kawauchi et al. (2010) showed that Rab5-, Rab11-, and Rab7-dependent endocytic pathways regulate distinct phases of cortical migration through N-Cadh trafficking. Rab5 promotes N-Cadh delivery to neuronal processes; Rab11 mediates recycling; and Rab7 targets N-Cadh for lysosomal degradation, collectively influencing migration dynamics and dendritic maturation [84].

Reelin further promotes multipolar migration and the transition of multipolar to bipolar neuroblasts by activating Rap1 and increasing N-Cadh abundance at the cell surface, where N-Cadh acts in cis to stabilize FGFR and enhance Erk1/2 signaling, thereby supporting neuroblast migration [85]. N-Cadh and R-Cadh have also been implicated in nucleokinesis through interacting with β-catenin. Upon dephosphorylation by PTP1B, it forms a β-catenin complex with α-catenin and actin, enabling anchoring and transmission of contractile forces. This mechanism intersects with LIS1-dependent regulation, consistent with the integration of cadherin-based adhesion and microtubule-dependent machinery during nuclear translocation [86].

As previously mentioned, PCDH19 has been implicated in neuronal migration within the cortex. Because PCDH19 is X-linked, random X-chromosome inactivation in heterozygous females generates cellular mosaicism that disrupts homophilic adhesion, alters network assembly, and contributes to cortical malformations and epilepsy phenotypes [46,87]. Additionally, PCDH19 loss increases seizure susceptibility, linking developmental defects to clinical features observed in PCDH19-associated epilepsy [87,88]. Pcdh19 has emerged as a key regulator of neuronal migration during corticogenesis by coupling cell–cell adhesion to cytoskeletal dynamics. Loss-of-function studies indicate that Pcdh19 deficiency disrupts radial migration, leading to impaired cortical layering and abnormal neuronal positioning by modulating adhesion complexes that influence intracellular signaling pathways controlling cytoskeletal organization, likely through interactions with Rho GTPase signaling (Figure 3), thereby affecting actin remodeling and indirectly influencing microtubule stability and nucleokinesis. Additionally, altered Pcdh19 function has been associated with defects in centrosome positioning and polarity establishment, processes that are essential for coordinated neuronal movement. A proposed model is that Ca2+-dependent conformational changes in Pcdh19 regulate its adhesive properties and downstream signaling, linking extracellular cues to intracellular pathways that coordinate actin–microtubule crosstalk. However, while these findings support a role for Pcdh19 in migration, much of the mechanistic evidence remains indirect or derived from in vitro or non-cortical systems. Hence, further in vivo studies are required to establish how Pcdh19-dependent signaling specifically integrates Ca2+ dynamics with cytoskeletal remodeling during cortical neuron migration [45].

Recently, calneurons (CALNs) have been proposed to influence neuronal migration. These are transmembrane CaM-like neuronal Ca2+ sensors with high Ca2+ affinity, predominantly localized to the trans-Golgi network. CALN1 (CaBP8) and CALN2 (CaBP7) have been reported to exhibit among the highest Ca2+ binding affinities of neuronal sensors (Kds of 230 nM and 180 nM, respectively) [89,90,91]. In human-embryonic-stem-cell-derived models, CALN1 has been linked to schizophrenia-associated loci. Its deletion in human dorsal forebrain organoids reduces mature neuronal output and Cajal–Retzius cell abundance, perturbs dorsal progenitor differentiation, and decreases S100B expression. These effects are likely mediated, at least in part, through downstream cytoskeletal pathways that converge on microtubule organization and neuronal polarity, and suggest that CALN1 may indirectly influence neuronal migration by shaping key cellular populations and signaling environments required for cortical organization [92].

3.3. Neurite Outgrowth and Early Neurite Maturation

Formation of neuronal circuits depends on neurite initiation, elongation, and guidance, which are processes executed by the growth cone. Growth cones are highly dynamic structures at the tips of developing axons and dendrites that integrate biochemical and mechanical cues to steer neurite extension toward synaptic targets. Within growth cones, Ca2+ acts as a spatiotemporally precise regulator, linking extracellular guidance signals to cytoskeletal remodeling by activating effector proteins that decode Ca2+ transients into defined structural outputs. Importantly, the amplitude, source, spatial distribution, and kinetics of Ca2+ transients are critical determinants of growth cone motility and directional decision-making. Although Ca2+-dependent actin remodeling and membrane trafficking are essential for growth cone motility, these processes are functionally coupled to microtubule invasion into the peripheral domain, which stabilizes directional growth and supports neurite extension.

The growth cone is organized into a peripheral domain enriched in F-actin-based lamellipodia and filopodia, a central domain containing stable microtubule bundles and organelles such as the ER, and a transition zone that supports Ca2+-dependent molecular switches between advance, turning, and retraction. At the leading edge, localized Ca2+ transients can promote actin polymerization and membrane protrusion in response to attractive cues (Figure 4) [93,94,95]. In contrast, global and/or high-amplitude Ca2+ elevations activate actin severing and depolymerizing pathways, including gelsolin and the phosphatase CaN, which can regulate cofilin-mediated F-actin disassembly [96,97]. Ca2+ influx also modulates myosin II activity, and thus retrograde actin flow, which pulls the cytoskeleton rearward unless counterbalanced by substrate adhesion [98,99].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Ca2+ microdomain signaling in growth cone filopodia during guidance cue responses. Schematic of a neuronal growth cone highlighting the central domain (CD), transition zone (TZ), and peripheral domain (PD), with lamellipodia and filopodia at the leading edge. Inset: magnified single filopodium illustrating Ca2+ microdomains generated by activation of membrane receptors, including G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRK). Receptor signaling promotes production of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3), triggering Ca2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and drives Ca2+ influx through stromal interaction molecule (STIM1) interactions with store-operated Ca2+ entry channels (ORAI) and transient receptor potential canonical (TRPC) channels. Local Ca2+ elevations activate Ca2+-dependent effectors, such as calmodulin (CaM) and Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent kinases (CaMK/CaMKK), as well as STIM1/microtubule plus-end-tracking protein (EB), leading to actin cytoskeleton remodeling that regulates filopodial protrusion and retraction, growth cone motility, and directional turning. At the filopodial tip, Ca2+-dependent vesicle trafficking and SNARE-mediated exocytosis promote asymmetric membrane addition to reinforce guidance cue-directed steering. Created in https://BioRender.com/aiiw8bj (accessed on 18 April 2026).

Within filopodia, localized increases in Ca2+ activate calpains, which are Ca2+-dependent proteases that remodel adhesion and tune the balance between kinase- and phosphatase-mediated signaling, thereby stabilizing protrusions. Calpain-mediated proteolysis of adhesion-associated proteins, including talin and focal adhesion kinase, contributes to the adhesion turnover required for guidance decisions [100].

Concomitantly, the invasion of dynamic MTs from the central into the peripheral domain stabilizes the newly selected direction of growth. This process is coupled to ER Ca2+ dynamics and to the interaction of Stim1 with microtubule plus-end-tracking proteins EB1 and EB3, which promotes coordinated recruitment of dynamic MTs and ER tubules toward the proximal side of filopodia exposed to attractive stimuli (Figure 4) [101]. Beyond Stim1, the microtubule-associated protein tau facilitates exploration of the actin-rich peripheral domain. Tau knockdown yields disorganized MTs that fail to invade filopodia and impair growth cone navigation [102]. Consistent with this model, Stim1 mRNA silencing in embryonic rat dorsal root ganglion sensory neurons restricts ER tubule extension into filopodia, depletes local Ca2+ stores, and abolishes the directional growth cone turning. In zebrafish embryos, loss of Stim1a function in motor neurons reduced filopodia density, induced axonal stalling at choice points, and diminished Ca2+ transients during in vivo navigation [101].

A major route by which Ca2+ regulates growth cone decision-making is through phosphorylation-dependent signaling cascades. Wayman et al. (2004) demonstrated in neonatal hippocampal neurons and postnatal cerebellar granule neurons that Ca2+/CaM activates CaMKK and CaMKI, thereby regulating growth cone motility and axon extension [103]. More broadly, relatively higher Ca2+ levels can favor CaMKII activation and are frequently associated with attractive turning, whereas lower Ca2+ levels preferentially engage CaN-dependent pathways linked to repulsive responses [104]. Recent optogenetic approaches refine this framework by showing that Ca2+ frequency and amplitude function as separable coding parameters: slow, low-amplitude signals predominantly regulate steering direction, whereas fast, high-amplitude signals influence the rate of axon extension [105].

Thus, Ca2+ signaling integrates actin dynamics with microtubule remodeling, particularly microtubule invasion into the peripheral domain to ensure coordinated cytoskeletal organization during neurite guidance.

In addition to cytoskeletal remodeling, Ca2+-dependent membrane trafficking is required for neurite initiation and extension. The ER contributes to Ca2+-dependent regulation of vesicle-associated membrane proteins (VAMPs) and SNARE-mediated fusion events. VAMP2 and VAMP7 have been implicated in early neurite sprouting from the soma, whereas subsequent outgrowth is supported by VAMP7-positive vesicles transported from soma to growth cone in a microtubule-dependent manner (Figure 4) [106,107]. Additional SNARE components, including SNAP25 and syntaxins 1, 6, and 13, are also required for axon outgrowth [108,109,110,111].

Taken together, the aforementioned studies indicate that Ca2+ signaling does not simply activate general kinase pathways; rather, it spatially organizes cytoskeletal and trafficking regulators within compartmentalized microdomains to coordinate protrusion, adhesion turnover, and microtubule invasion.

Collectively, Ca2+ amplitude, source, localization, and temporal dynamics are integrated through CaMKII–CaN switching, calpain-mediated adhesion remodeling, SOCE-dependent signaling, ER–microtubule coupling, and Ca2+-regulated exocytosis to drive coordinated rearrangements of actin, MTs, and membrane. This integrated architecture enables growth cones to convert extracellular gradients into directional motility, ensuring accurate axon pathfinding during circuit formation.

Beyond growth cone steering and early axon pathfinding, Ca2+-regulated cytoskeletal programs continue to shape neurite maturation, including dendritic branching and spine stabilization, through coordinated regulation of actin-microtubule coupling and local microtubule dynamics. S100B has been implicated in cytoskeletal regulation during brain development through interaction with microtubule-associated proteins, including tau, thereby modulating microtubule stability and assembly. S100B may also influence neuronal structure via a CaMKII-dependent mechanism [35]. Double immunofluorescence studies report S100B colocalization with GFAP- and vimentin-positive cells, as well as association with centrosomes, supporting structural coupling to cytoskeletal elements. In transgenic mice overexpressing human S100B, increased MAP2-positive dendritic density has been observed during early hippocampal development, suggesting that S100B modulates dendritic architecture and may also affect synaptic maturation via microtubule reorganization (Figure 5) [112].

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Calcium-dependent regulation of dendritic development and maintenance. During CNS development, astrocytes release S100B, a Ca2+-binding protein that acts as a paracrine modulator of neuronal morphogenesis. At physiological concentrations, S100B binds to RAGE (Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products) expressed in developing neurons, activating intracellular signaling cascades including MAPK/ERK, PI3K/Akt, and NF-κB through Ca2+-dependent signal that control key processes in dendritic morphogenesis, including neurite extension, dendritic branching, and cytoskeletal remodeling. In this context, MAP2 (Microtubule-Associated Protein 2) plays a critical structural role in dendrites by stabilizing MTs and coordinating their interaction with actin filaments, which are processes that are highly sensitive to Ca2+ signaling. Ca2+ oscillations can modulate the activity of effector proteins such as calmodulin and Ca2+-dependent kinases, influencing cytoskeletal organization and the phosphorylation state of microtubule-associated proteins, including MAP2. The interaction among astrocyte-derived S100B, RAGE activation in neurons, and intracellular Ca2+ signaling regulates dendritic elongation, branching, and maturation, promoting dendritic arbor formation during the establishment of neuronal circuits in the developing brain. Created in https://BioRender.com/aiiw8bj (accessed on 18 April 2026).

Consistent with a prominent role for CaMKIIβ in actin-based morphogenesis, shRNA-mediated silencing of CamkIIβ mRNA in CA1 pyramidal neurons in organotypic slices from postnatal rats (P6–P8) reduces mature dendritic spine density and increases immature filopodia-like protrusion. This phenotype is rescued by expression of an shRNA-resistant CamkIIβ variant, highlighting the requirement for CaMKIIβ/F-actin expression in dendritic spine maintenance [26]. CaMKII activation has been proposed to trigger a transient phase of robust actin remodeling following Ca2+ influx, followed by an autoinhibited phase that stabilizes induced structural changes. Notably, CaMKII has also been reported to associate with MTs near active synapses, supporting a dual role in coordinating actin and microtubule dynamics during synaptic plasticity [26,27].

In the rat brain, PCDH19 expression peaks around postnatal day 10 (P10), coinciding with dendritic maturation. In utero knockdown disrupts hippocampal pyramidal neuron migration and reduces dendritic length; these effects are rescued by shRNA-resistant PCDH19. The underlying mechanism has not yet been clearly defined, and although cytoskeletal regulation is proposed, its role remains unclear [48].

4. Conclusions

This review positions Ca2+ signaling as a central integrator of microtubule dynamics during corticogenesis, linking extracellular cues to the cytoskeletal mechanisms that govern neural progenitor behavior and cortical assembly. Through Ca2+-dependent effectors, including CaM/CaMK pathways, S100 proteins, cadherins/protocadherins, especially PCDH19, centrins, and ER Ca2+ sensors, spatiotemporal Ca2+ signals are coupled to centrosome function, mitotic spindle organization, and microtubule remodeling. Collectively, these processes regulate progenitor proliferation, division mode, neuronal migration, and early morphogenesis and morphological maturation of cortical neurons.

Despite these advances, a key unresolved question is how distinct Ca2+ signaling features, such as oscillations, frequency, local microdomains, and multicellular waves, are selectively decoded into specific microtubule-based outputs. Although several components of these pathways have been directly characterized in mammalian NSCs, many proposed mechanisms remain extrapolated from non-neural or simplified in vitro systems, underscoring the need for in vivo validation in the developing cortex. Addressing this gap will require integrative approaches that combine high-resolution Ca2+ imaging with quantitative measurements of microtubule dynamics and cell behavior in physiologically relevant models and preparations.

From a translational perspective, disruption of Ca2+-dependent cytoskeletal regulation is increasingly linked to neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by altered cortical cytoarchitecture and connectivity. A more precise understanding of Ca2+-microtubule signaling networks may therefore enable identification of tractable nodes for therapeutic modulation of neurogenesis and cortical organization. Overall, the evidence reviewed here supports a model in which Ca2+ signaling operates as a context-dependent regulator that integrates molecular signaling and cytoskeletal remodeling to shape corticogenesis.

Acknowledgments

The authors used Grammarly Premium (Grammarly PRO) for language editing and correction and EndNote 2025 for the reference section. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication. All authors appreciate Ivone Estephania Caballero Moncada for helping with the PubMed literature search.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:

AURKA Aurora-A kinase
Ca2+ calcium
CALN calneuron
CaM calmodulin
CaMKs Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinases
CaN calcineurin
CaBPs calcium-binding proteins
CEN centrin
CRAC Ca2+-release-activated calcium channels
DAG diacylglycerol
EC extracellular cadherin domains
ER endoplasmic reticulum
F-actin filamentous actin
GPCRs G-protein-coupled receptors
IPs intermediate progenitors
IP3 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate
IP3Rs inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors
MTs microtubules
N-Cadh N-cadherin
NECs neuroepithelial cells
NSCs neural stem cells
PCDH19 protocadherin 19
PLC phospholipase c
RGC radial glial cell
STIM stromal interaction molecule
TRPC transient receptor potential channels
VZ ventricular zone
VAMPs vesicle-associated membrane proteins
γ-Tub γ-tubulin

Author Contributions

D.S.D.l.M.-G., R.V.-B. and R.H.-G., conceptualization, manuscript draft, and images drafting. N.F.D. and A.M.-H., bibliography selection, manuscript correction, final image correction and selection, and manuscript editing. All authors actively participated in the writing of the draft and final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the writing of the manuscript.

Funding Statement

A.M.-H. is funded by the Instituto Nacional de Perinatología Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes (protocol number 2020-1-9).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Kriegstein A., Alvarez-Buylla A. The glial nature of embryonic and adult neural stem cells. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2009;32:149–184. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Berridge M.J., Bootman M.D., Roderick H.L. Calcium signalling: Dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003;4:517–529. doi: 10.1038/nrm1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Arjun McKinney A., Petrova R., Panagiotakos G. Calcium and activity-dependent signaling in the developing cerebral cortex. Development. 2022;149:dev198853. doi: 10.1242/dev.198853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dupont G., Combettes L. Fine tuning of cytosolic Ca (2+) oscillations. F1000Res. 2016;5:2036. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8438.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kanemaru K., Nakamura Y. Activation Mechanisms and Diverse Functions of Mammalian Phospholipase C. Biomolecules. 2023;13:915. doi: 10.3390/biom13060915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Owens D.F., Kriegstein A.R. Patterns of intracellular calcium fluctuation in precursor cells of the neocortical ventricular zone. J. Neurosci. 1998;18:5374–5388. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-14-05374.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weissman T.A., Riquelme P.A., Ivic L., Flint A.C., Kriegstein A.R. Calcium waves propagate through radial glial cells and modulate proliferation in the developing neocortex. Neuron. 2004;43:647–661. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rasmussen C.D., Means A.R. Calmodulin is required for cell-cycle progression during G1 and mitosis. EMBO J. 1989;8:73–82. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03350.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Plotnikova O.V., Nikonova A.S., Loskutov Y.V., Kozyulina P.Y., Pugacheva E.N., Golemis E.A. Calmodulin activation of Aurora-A kinase (AURKA) is required during ciliary disassembly and in mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2012;23:2658–2670. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e11-12-1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rash B.G., Ackman J.B., Rakic P. Bidirectional radial Ca(2+) activity regulates neurogenesis and migration during early cortical column formation. Sci. Adv. 2016;2:e1501733. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Owens D.F., Flint A.C., Dammerman R.S., Kriegstein A.R. Calcium dynamics of neocortical ventricular zone cells. Dev. Neurosci. 2000;22:25–33. doi: 10.1159/000017424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ulengin-Talkish I., Cyert M.S. A cellular atlas of calcineurin signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2023;1870:119366. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2022.119366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kaitsuka T. The Unique Roles of Ion Channels in Pluripotent Stem Cells in Response to Biological Stimuli. Biology. 2024;13:1043. doi: 10.3390/biology13121043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yamanaka R., Shindo Y., Oka K. Magnesium Is a Key Player in Neuronal Maturation and Neuropathology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:3439. doi: 10.3390/ijms20143439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Adamo A.M., Supasai S., Salvador G., Liu X., Mackenzie G.G., Oteiza P.I. Zinc, redox regulation and brain development. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2026;251:137–154. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2026.03.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yu B., Ma H., Du Z., Hong Y., Sang M., Liu Y., Shi Y. Involvement of calmodulin and actin in directed differentiation of rat cortical neural stem cells into neurons. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2011;28:739–744. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2011.734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Berridge M.J., Lipp P., Bootman M.D. The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000;1:11–21. doi: 10.1038/35036035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rosenberg S.S., Spitzer N.C. Calcium signaling in neuronal development. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011;3:a004259. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a004259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Elies J., Yanez M., Pereira T.M.C., Gil-Longo J., MacDougall D.A., Campos-Toimil M. An Update to Calcium Binding Proteins. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020;1131:183–213. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-12457-1_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Munk M., Villalobo E., Villalobo A., Berchtold M.W. Differential expression of the three independent CaM genes coding for an identical protein: Potential relevance of distinct mRNA stability by different codon usage. Cell Calcium. 2022;107:102656. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2022.102656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Friedberg F., Rhoads A.R. Evolutionary aspects of calmodulin. IUBMB Life. 2001;51:215–221. doi: 10.1080/152165401753311753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Finn B.E., Forsen S. The evolving model of calmodulin structure, function and activation. Structure. 1995;3:7–11. doi: 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00130-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chin D., Means A.R. Calmodulin: A prototypical calcium sensor. Trends Cell Biol. 2000;10:322–328. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(00)01800-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kennedy M.B., Greengard P. Two calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases, which are highly concentrated in brain, phosphorylate protein I at distinct sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1981;78:1293–1297. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.2.1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yamauchi T., Fujisawa H. Evidence for three distinct forms of calmodulin-dependent protein kinases from rat brain. FEBS Lett. 1980;116:141–144. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)80628-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Okamoto K., Narayanan R., Lee S.H., Murata K., Hayashi Y. The role of CaMKII as an F-actin-bundling protein crucial for maintenance of dendritic spine structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:6418–6423. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701656104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lemieux M., Labrecque S., Tardif C., Labrie-Dion E., Lebel E., De Koninck P. Translocation of CaMKII to dendritic microtubules supports the plasticity of local synapses. J. Cell Biol. 2012;198:1055–1073. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201202058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Donato R. S100: A multigenic family of calcium-modulated proteins of the EF-hand type with intracellular and extracellular functional roles. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2001;33:637–668. doi: 10.1016/S1357-2725(01)00046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Donato R., Cannon B.R., Sorci G., Riuzzi F., Hsu K., Weber D.J., Geczy C.L. Functions of S100 proteins. Curr. Mol. Med. 2013;13:24–57. doi: 10.2174/156652413804486214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Donato R., Sorci G., Riuzzi F., Arcuri C., Bianchi R., Brozzi F., Tubaro C., Giambanco I. S100B’s double life: Intracellular regulator and extracellular signal. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1793:1008–1022. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tiu S.C., Chan W.Y., Heizmann C.W., Schafer B.W., Shu S.Y., Yew D.T. Differential expression of S100B and S100A6(1) in the human fetal and aged cerebral cortex. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 2000;119:159–168. doi: 10.1016/S0165-3806(99)00151-0. Correction in Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 2000, 124, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-3806(00)00094-8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Heizmann C.W., Fritz G., Schafer B.W. S100 proteins: Structure, functions and pathology. Front. Biosci. 2002;7:d1356–d1368. doi: 10.2741/a846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Landry C.F., Ivy G.O., Dunn R.J., Marks A., Brown I.R. Expression of the gene encoding the beta-subunit of S-100 protein in the developing rat brain analyzed by in situ hybridization. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 1989;6:251–262. doi: 10.1016/0169-328X(89)90071-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Raponi E., Agenes F., Delphin C., Assard N., Baudier J., Legraverend C., Deloulme J.C. S100B expression defines a state in which GFAP-expressing cells lose their neural stem cell potential and acquire a more mature developmental stage. Glia. 2007;55:165–177. doi: 10.1002/glia.20445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Baudier J., Cole R.D. Interactions between the microtubule-associated tau proteins and S100b regulate tau phosphorylation by the Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. J. Biol. Chem. 1988;263:5876–5883. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)60647-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sorci G., Agneletti A.L., Donato R. Effects of S100A1 and S100B on microtubule stability. An in vitro study using triton-cytoskeletons from astrocyte and myoblast cell lines. Neuroscience. 2000;99:773–783. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00238-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Esposito G., Scuderi C., Lu J., Savani C., De Filippis D., Iuvone T., Steardo L., Jr., Sheen V., Steardo L. S100B induces tau protein hyperphosphorylation via Dickopff-1 up-regulation and disrupts the Wnt pathway in human neural stem cells. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2008;12:914–927. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00159.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.D’Ambrosi N., Milani M., Apolloni S. S100A4 in the Physiology and Pathology of the Central and Peripheral Nervous System. Cells. 2021;10:798. doi: 10.3390/cells10040798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Helfman D.M., Kim E.J., Lukanidin E., Grigorian M. The metastasis associated protein S100A4: Role in tumour progression and metastasis. Br. J. Cancer. 2005;92:1955–1958. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chan W.Y., Xia C.L., Dong D.C., Heizmann C.W., Yew D.T. Differential expression of S100 proteins in the developing human hippocampus and temporal cortex. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2003;60:600–613. doi: 10.1002/jemt.10302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Novitskaya V., Grigorian M., Kriajevska M., Tarabykina S., Bronstein I., Berezin V., Bock E., Lukanidin E. Oligomeric forms of the metastasis-related Mts1 (S100A4) protein stimulate neuronal differentiation in cultures of rat hippocampal neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:41278–41286. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M007058200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pedersen M.V., Kohler L.B., Grigorian M., Novitskaya V., Bock E., Lukanidin E., Berezin V. The Mts1/S100A4 protein is a neuroprotectant. J. Neurosci. Res. 2004;77:777–786. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shapiro L., Fannon A.M., Kwong P.D., Thompson A., Lehmann M.S., Grubel G., Legrand J.F., Als-Nielsen J., Colman D.R., Hendrickson W.A. Structural basis of cell-cell adhesion by cadherins. Nature. 1995;374:327–337. doi: 10.1038/374327a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sotomayor M., Gaudet R., Corey D.P. Sorting out a promiscuous superfamily: Towards cadherin connectomics. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24:524–536. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wolverton T., Lalande M. Identification and characterization of three members of a novel subclass of protocadherins. Genomics. 2001;76:66–72. doi: 10.1006/geno.2001.6592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dibbens L.M., Tarpey P.S., Hynes K., Bayly M.A., Scheffer I.E., Smith R., Bomar J., Sutton E., Vandeleur L., Shoubridge C., et al. X-linked protocadherin 19 mutations cause female-limited epilepsy and cognitive impairment. Nat. Genet. 2008;40:776–781. doi: 10.1038/ng.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cooper S.R., Emond M.R., Duy P.Q., Liebau B.G., Wolman M.A., Jontes J.D. Protocadherins control the modular assembly of neuronal columns in the zebrafish optic tectum. J. Cell Biol. 2015;211:807–814. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201507108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pederick D.T., Homan C.C., Jaehne E.J., Piltz S.G., Haines B.P., Baune B.T., Jolly L.A., Hughes J.N., Gecz J., Thomas P.Q. Pcdh19 Loss-of-Function Increases Neuronal Migration In Vitro but is Dispensable for Brain Development in Mice. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:26765. doi: 10.1038/srep26765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lin J., Wang C., Redies C. Expression of delta-protocadherins in the spinal cord of the chicken embryo. J. Comp. Neurol. 2012;520:1509–1531. doi: 10.1002/cne.22808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gaitan Y., Bouchard M. Expression of the delta-protocadherin gene Pcdh19 in the developing mouse embryo. Gene Expr. Patterns. 2006;6:893–899. doi: 10.1016/j.modgep.2006.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Emond M.R., Biswas S., Morrow M.L., Jontes J.D. Proximity-dependent Proteomics Reveals Extensive Interactions of Protocadherin-19 with Regulators of Rho GTPases and the Microtubule Cytoskeleton. Neuroscience. 2021;452:26–36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.09.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Braga V.M. Cell-cell adhesion and signalling. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2002;14:546–556. doi: 10.1016/S0955-0674(02)00373-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gloerich M., Bianchini J.M., Siemers K.A., Cohen D.J., Nelson W.J. Cell division orientation is coupled to cell-cell adhesion by the E-cadherin/LGN complex. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:13996. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Konno D., Shioi G., Shitamukai A., Mori A., Kiyonari H., Miyata T., Matsuzaki F. Neuroepithelial progenitors undergo LGN-dependent planar divisions to maintain self-renewability during mammalian neurogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008;10:93–101. doi: 10.1038/ncb1673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Pedretti M., Bombardi L., Conter C., Favretto F., Dominici P., Astegno A. Structural Basis for the Functional Diversity of Centrins: A Focus on Calcium Sensing Properties and Target Recognition. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22 doi: 10.3390/ijms222212173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Salisbury J.L. Centrin, centrosomes, and mitotic spindle poles. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1995;7:39–45. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(95)80043-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Azimzadeh J., Bornens M. Structure and duplication of the centrosome. J. Cell Sci. 2007;120:2139–2142. doi: 10.1242/jcs.005231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gavet O., Alvarez C., Gaspar P., Bornens M. Centrin4p, a novel mammalian centrin specifically expressed in ciliated cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2003;14:1818–1834. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e02-11-0709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Meka D.P., Scharrenberg R., Calderon de Anda F. Emerging roles of the centrosome in neuronal development. Cytoskeleton. 2020;77:84–96. doi: 10.1002/cm.21593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kuriyama R., Terada Y., Lee K.S., Wang C.L. Centrosome replication in hydroxyurea-arrested CHO cells expressing GFP-tagged centrin2. J. Cell Sci. 2007;120:2444–2453. doi: 10.1242/jcs.008938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gotz M., Huttner W.B. The cell biology of neurogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005;6:777–788. doi: 10.1038/nrm1739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kosodo Y., Roper K., Haubensak W., Marzesco A.M., Corbeil D., Huttner W.B. Asymmetric distribution of the apical plasma membrane during neurogenic divisions of mammalian neuroepithelial cells. EMBO J. 2004;23:2314–2324. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mora-Bermudez F., Matsuzaki F., Huttner W.B. Specific polar subpopulations of astral microtubules control spindle orientation and symmetric neural stem cell division. Elife. 2014;3:e02875. doi: 10.7554/eLife.02875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Nigg E.A., Stearns T. The centrosome cycle: Centriole biogenesis, duplication and inherent asymmetries. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011;13:1154–1160. doi: 10.1038/ncb2345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Khodjakov A., Rieder C.L. The sudden recruitment of gamma-tubulin to the centrosome at the onset of mitosis and its dynamic exchange throughout the cell cycle, do not require microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 1999;146:585–596. doi: 10.1083/jcb.146.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kollman J.M., Merdes A., Mourey L., Agard D.A. Microtubule nucleation by gamma-tubulin complexes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011;12:709–721. doi: 10.1038/nrm3209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tanenbaum M.E., Medema R.H. Mechanisms of centrosome separation and bipolar spindle assembly. Dev. Cell. 2010;19:797–806. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Compton D.A. Spindle assembly in animal cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2000;69:95–114. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Vargas-Hurtado D., Brault J.B., Piolot T., Leconte L., Da Silva N., Pennetier C., Baffet A., Marthiens V., Basto R. Differences in Mitotic Spindle Architecture in Mammalian Neural Stem Cells Influence Mitotic Accuracy during Brain Development. Curr. Biol. 2019;29:2993–3005.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Izant J.G., Weatherbee J.A., McIntosh J.R. A microtubule-associated protein antigen unique to mitotic spindle microtubules in PtK1 cells. J. Cell Biol. 1983;96:424–434. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.2.424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hepler P.K., Palevitz B.A. Metabolic inhibitors block anaphase A in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 1986;102:1995–2005. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.6.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wang R.H., Fang M., Xue S.B. Changes of intracellular calcium, calmodulin in normal and tumor cells traggered by staurosporine. Shi Yan Sheng Wu Xue Bao. 1996;29:133–139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Yu Y.Y., Chen Y., Dai G., Chen J., Sun X.M., Wen C.J., Zhao D.H., Chang D.C., Li C.J. The association of calmodulin with central spindle regulates the initiation of cytokinesis in HeLa cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2004;36:1562–1572. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2003.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Li C.J., Heim R., Lu P., Pu Y., Tsien R.Y., Chang D.C. Dynamic redistribution of calmodulin in HeLa cells during cell division as revealed by a GFP-calmodulin fusion protein technique. J. Cell Sci. 1999;112:1567–1577. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.10.1567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Brady R.C., Cabral F., Dedman J.R. Identification of a 52-kD calmodulin-binding protein associated with the mitotic spindle apparatus in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 1986;103:1855–1861. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.5.1855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Fujitani M., Zhang S., Fujiki R., Fujihara Y., Yamashita T. A chromosome 16p13.11 microduplication causes hyperactivity through dysregulation of miR-484/protocadherin-19 signaling. Mol. Psychiatry. 2017;22:364–374. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Manning J.A., Lewis M., Koblar S.A., Kumar S. An essential function for the centrosomal protein NEDD1 in zebrafish development. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17:1302–1314. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2010.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Pinyol R., Scrofani J., Vernos I. The role of NEDD1 phosphorylation by Aurora A in chromosomal microtubule nucleation and spindle function. Curr. Biol. 2013;23:143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Degl’Innocenti E., Poloni T.E., Medici V., Recupero L., Dell’Amico C., Vannini E., Borello U., Mazzanti C.M., Onorati M., Dell’Anno M.T. Centrin 2: A Novel Marker of Mature and Neoplastic Human Astrocytes. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2022;16:858347. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.858347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wang X., Tsai J.W., Imai J.H., Lian W.N., Vallee R.B., Shi S.H. Asymmetric centrosome inheritance maintains neural progenitors in the neocortex. Nature. 2009;461:947–955. doi: 10.1038/nature08435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Jossin Y. Reelin Functions, Mechanisms of Action and Signaling Pathways During Brain Development and Maturation. Biomolecules. 2020;10:964. doi: 10.3390/biom10060964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Sakakibara A., Hatanaka Y. Neuronal polarization in the developing cerebral cortex. Front. Neurosci. 2015;9:116. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kim S.A., Tai C.Y., Mok L.P., Mosser E.A., Schuman E.M. Calcium-dependent dynamics of cadherin interactions at cell-cell junctions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:9857–9862. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019003108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kawauchi T., Sekine K., Shikanai M., Chihama K., Tomita K., Kubo K., Nakajima K., Nabeshima Y., Hoshino M. Rab GTPases-dependent endocytic pathways regulate neuronal migration and maturation through N-cadherin trafficking. Neuron. 2010;67:588–602. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kon E., Calvo-Jimenez E., Cossard A., Na Y., Cooper J.A., Jossin Y. N-cadherin-regulated FGFR ubiquitination and degradation control mammalian neocortical projection neuron migration. Elife. 2019;8:e47673. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Martinez-Garay I., Gil-Sanz C., Franco S.J., Espinosa A., Molnar Z., Mueller U. Cadherin 2/4 signaling via PTP1B and catenins is crucial for nucleokinesis during radial neuronal migration in the neocortex. Development. 2016;143:2121–2134. doi: 10.1242/dev.132456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kurian M., Korff C.M., Ranza E., Bernasconi A., Lubbig A., Nangia S., Ramelli G.P., Wohlrab G., Nordli D.R., Jr., Bast T. Focal cortical malformations in children with early infantile epilepsy and PCDH19 mutations: Case report. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol. 2018;60:100–105. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Robens B.K., Yang X., McGraw C.M., Turner L.H., Robens C., Thyme S., Rotenberg A., Poduri A. Mosaic and non-mosaic protocadherin 19 mutation leads to neuronal hyperexcitability in zebrafish. Neurobiol. Dis. 2022;169:105738. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Mikhaylova M., Reddy P.P., Munsch T., Landgraf P., Suman S.K., Smalla K.H., Gundelfinger E.D., Sharma Y., Kreutz M.R. Calneurons provide a calcium threshold for trans-Golgi network to plasma membrane trafficking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:9093–9098. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903001106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Mikhaylova M., Sharma Y., Reissner C., Nagel F., Aravind P., Rajini B., Smalla K.H., Gundelfinger E.D., Kreutz M.R. Neuronal Ca2+ signaling via caldendrin and calneurons. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2006;1763:1229–1237. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.08.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hradsky J., Bernstein H.G., Marunde M., Mikhaylova M., Kreutz M.R. Alternative splicing, expression and cellular localization of Calneuron-1 in the rat and human brain. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2015;63:793–804. doi: 10.1369/0022155415595841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Li H.-J., Yu X., Liu X., Xu J., Chen J., Cheng T., Chung S., Shu Y., Shao Z. Calneuron 1 reveals the pivotal roles in schizophrenia via perturbing human forebrain development and causing hallucination-like behavior in mice. bioRxiv. 2024 doi: 10.1101/2024.04.16.589839. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Buck K.B., Zheng J.Q. Growth cone turning induced by direct local modification of microtubule dynamics. J. Neurosci. 2002;22:9358–9367. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-21-09358.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Gomez T.M., Robles E., Poo M., Spitzer N.C. Filopodial calcium transients promote substrate-dependent growth cone turning. Science. 2001;291:1983–1987. doi: 10.1126/science.1056490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Lankford K.L., Letourneau P.C. Evidence that calcium may control neurite outgrowth by regulating the stability of actin filaments. J. Cell Biol. 1989;109:1229–1243. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.3.1229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Lautermilch N.J., Spitzer N.C. Regulation of calcineurin by growth cone calcium waves controls neurite extension. J. Neurosci. 2000;20:315–325. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-01-00315.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Tanaka J., Kira M., Sobue K. Gelsolin is localized in neuronal growth cones. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 1993;76:268–271. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(93)90217-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Shin E.Y., Lee C.S., Yun C.Y., Won S.Y., Kim H.K., Lee Y.H., Kwak S.J., Kim E.G. Non-muscle myosin II regulates neuronal actin dynamics by interacting with guanine nucleotide exchange factors. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e95212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Turney S.G., Bridgman P.C. Laminin stimulates and guides axonal outgrowth via growth cone myosin II activity. Nat. Neurosci. 2005;8:717–719. doi: 10.1038/nn1466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Kerstein P.C., Patel K.M., Gomez T.M. Calpain-Mediated Proteolysis of Talin and FAK Regulates Adhesion Dynamics Necessary for Axon Guidance. J. Neurosci. 2017;37:1568–1580. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2769-16.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Pavez M., Thompson A.C., Arnott H.J., Mitchell C.B., D’Atri I., Don E.K., Chilton J.K., Scott E.K., Lin J.Y., Young K.M., et al. STIM1 Is Required for Remodeling of the Endoplasmic Reticulum and Microtubule Cytoskeleton in Steering Growth Cones. J. Neurosci. 2019;39:5095–5114. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2496-18.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Biswas S., Kalil K. The Microtubule-Associated Protein Tau Mediates the Organization of Microtubules and Their Dynamic Exploration of Actin-Rich Lamellipodia and Filopodia of Cortical Growth Cones. J. Neurosci. 2018;38:291–307. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2281-17.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Wayman G.A., Kaech S., Grant W.F., Davare M., Impey S., Tokumitsu H., Nozaki N., Banker G., Soderling T.R. Regulation of axonal extension and growth cone motility by calmodulin-dependent protein kinase I. J. Neurosci. 2004;24:3786–3794. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3294-03.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Uboha N.V., Flajolet M., Nairn A.C., Picciotto M.R. A calcium- and calmodulin-dependent kinase Ialpha/microtubule affinity regulating kinase 2 signaling cascade mediates calcium-dependent neurite outgrowth. J. Neurosci. 2007;27:4413–4423. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0725-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Gomez T.M., Spitzer N.C. In vivo regulation of axon extension and pathfinding by growth-cone calcium transients. Nature. 1999;397:350–355. doi: 10.1038/16927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Burgo A., Sotirakis E., Simmler M.C., Verraes A., Chamot C., Simpson J.C., Lanzetti L., Proux-Gillardeaux V., Galli T. Role of Varp, a Rab21 exchange factor and TI-VAMP/VAMP7 partner, in neurite growth. EMBO Rep. 2009;10:1117–1124. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Martinez-Arca S., Coco S., Mainguy G., Schenk U., Alberts P., Bouille P., Mezzina M., Prochiantz A., Matteoli M., Louvard D., et al. A common exocytotic mechanism mediates axonal and dendritic outgrowth. J. Neurosci. 2001;21:3830–3838. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-11-03830.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Osen-Sand A., Catsicas M., Staple J.K., Jones K.A., Ayala G., Knowles J., Grenningloh G., Catsicas S. Inhibition of axonal growth by SNAP-25 antisense oligonucleotides in vitro and in vivo. Nature. 1993;364:445–448. doi: 10.1038/364445a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Hirling H., Steiner P., Chaperon C., Marsault R., Regazzi R., Catsicas S. Syntaxin 13 is a developmentally regulated SNARE involved in neurite outgrowth and endosomal trafficking. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2000;12:1913–1923. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00076.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Kabayama H., Tokushige N., Takeuchi M., Mikoshiba K. Syntaxin 6 regulates nerve growth factor-dependent neurite outgrowth. Neurosci. Lett. 2008;436:340–344. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.03.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Zhou Q., Xiao J., Liu Y. Participation of syntaxin 1A in membrane trafficking involving neurite elongation and membrane expansion. J. Neurosci. Res. 2000;61:321–328. doi: 10.1002/1097-4547(20000801)61:3<321::AID-JNR10>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Whitaker-Azmitia P.M., Wingate M., Borella A., Gerlai R., Roder J., Azmitia E.C. Transgenic mice overexpressing the neurotrophic factor S-100 beta show neuronal cytoskeletal and behavioral signs of altered aging processes: Implications for Alzheimer’s disease and Down’s syndrome. Brain Res. 1997;776:51–60. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(97)01002-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created.


Articles from Brain Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES