Abstract
Two experiments explored the effects of two types of concurrent activity on human fixed-interval performance. Eight adult subjects were given access to either reading material or a working television set across three fixed-interval values (60 s, 300 s, and 600 s). During Experiment 1, 2 subjects produced "scalloped" patterns and reported no verbal regulation (e.g., counting) in the presence of the reading material, but shifted to low-rate patterns and reported verbal regulation when the reading material was withdrawn. The 2 other subjects in Experiment 1 produced consistent low-rate performances and reported verbal regulation during access to reading material. However, when these subjects were given access to a working television set, they produced scalloped patterns and reported no verbal regulation. During Experiment 2, 4 experimentally naive subjects showed consistent scalloped patterning and no verbal regulation across fixed-interval values when they were allowed to watch television. When access to the television was denied, subjects reliably reported verbal regulation, and low-rate patterns emerged. These behavioral effects focus our attention on the contingencies that control human performance on fixed-interval schedules.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31707/317075503b5c8eb657f72a817c1627cbd63dd401" alt="501"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ccfc/4ccfc3efbd0d50608f65b34fc40ac69de4889c1c" alt="502"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf8f9/bf8f953f0d69d3c55668ca40ae9f220a473a57e6" alt="503"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd80e/fd80e85539be746c269112fc66b79e7dbd87ee87" alt="504"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c722d/c722d639eefbd232a1ed858fc0b746ed9c8ee0c7" alt="505"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0803e/0803e456d241f9b8f9aeacf070e7aa17d90fa187" alt="506"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96b05/96b051d111390b0c54f61ed8e068f2b72f7f8ce9" alt="507"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f06d7/f06d7ce8db14ed4c8ee8088e33244307a06d7b2e" alt="508"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ce12/6ce1233ebf1d14bdd2f61187a466f817ff268406" alt="509"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9208c/9208c20f6fa17dcd25b37eeb5ee877d816562c0b" alt="510"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f15df/f15df3956d9f4d2c22babbb2ab24718af90fbd0a" alt="511"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d888/7d8881267db95d062209988133391728b65e029e" alt="512"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8824f/8824f0d2977f4d323aad1805c1bb4c5a659355a8" alt="513"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e15c8/e15c8649bdd7025d8fff86776f299caba62e4a5d" alt="514"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06d20/06d20383dbbef7ef3653ca19eda0d714661e08c9" alt="515"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4461c/4461ccd5e5c1f4638f32bd058bf16fae427a2a16" alt="516"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f93e9/f93e9bac3eadfc0092ddea8185973c3909517b2d" alt="517"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d58a1/d58a1b53894f6491f74ef67f8388de85ebae3d87" alt="518"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69bac/69bacdf96f616d264ef33b0ca51c943826da054a" alt="519"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04262/042628ac3b4d1d78eba7d2ac634b4eb1d75e9ddd" alt="520"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cerutti D. T. Discrimination theory of rule-governed behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Mar;51(2):259–276. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joyce J. H., Chase P. N. Effects of response variability on the sensitivity of rule-governed behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):251–262. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laties V. G., Weiss B. Effects of a concurrent task on fixed-interval responding in humans. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6(3):431–436. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lattal K. A., Bryan A. J. Effects of concurrent response-independent reinforcement on fixed-interval schedule performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):495–504. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowe C. F., Harzem P., Bagshaw M. Species differences in temporal control of behavior II: human performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):351–361. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowe C. F., Harzem P., Hughes S. Determinats of operant behavior in humans: some differences from animals. Q J Exp Psychol. 1978 May;30(2):373–386. doi: 10.1080/14640747808400684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Rosenfarb I. S., Newland M. C., Brannon S. E., Howey D. S. Effects of self-generated rules on the development of schedule-controlled behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):107–121. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wulfert E., Dougher M. J., Greenway D. E. Protocol analysis of the correspondence of verbal behavior and equivalence class formation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Nov;56(3):489–504. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]