Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1993 Jul;60(1):203–217. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-203

Scaling pigeons' choice of feeds: bigger is better.

P R Killeen 1, H Cate 1, T Tran 1
PMCID: PMC1322155  PMID: 8354967

Abstract

Preferences of hungry pigeons among 10 grains and pellets were analyzed using a Thurstone scaling procedure. The recovered scales were positively correlated with size of the feed. The correlations improved when the Thurstonian assumption of equal-sized discriminal dispersions (Case V) was replaced with the assumption of proportional-sized dispersions (Case VI), as entailed by Weber's law. The correlations weakened when the experiments were conducted with the pigeons close to their free-feeding weights, where the probability of sampling alternative grains increased. In the final experiment, exposure to a large pellet shifted the preferences between two smaller pellets.

Full text

PDF
215

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blough P. M. Selective attention and search images in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1991 Jul;17(3):292–298. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.17.3.292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. COOMBS C. H. On the use of inconsistency of preferences in psychological measurement. J Exp Psychol. 1958 Jan;55(1):1–7. doi: 10.1037/h0044694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. COOMBS C. H. Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement. Psychol Rev. 1950 May;57(3):145–158. doi: 10.1037/h0060984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Killeen P. R. Incentive theory: IV. Magnitude of reward. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):407–417. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lea S. E., Roper T. J. Demand for food on fixed-ratio schedules as a function of the quality of concurrently available reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Mar;27(2):371–380. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Miller H. L. Matching-based hedonic scaling in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):335–347. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shettleworth S. J. Handling time and choice in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Sep;44(2):139–155. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Svartdal F. Working harder for less: effect of incentive value on force of instrumental response in humans. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1993 Feb;46(1):11–34. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES