Abstract
Preferences of hungry pigeons among 10 grains and pellets were analyzed using a Thurstone scaling procedure. The recovered scales were positively correlated with size of the feed. The correlations improved when the Thurstonian assumption of equal-sized discriminal dispersions (Case V) was replaced with the assumption of proportional-sized dispersions (Case VI), as entailed by Weber's law. The correlations weakened when the experiments were conducted with the pigeons close to their free-feeding weights, where the probability of sampling alternative grains increased. In the final experiment, exposure to a large pellet shifted the preferences between two smaller pellets.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4550/b4550c3ca94c91c903f461f238d875818130bac2" alt="203"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cfb5/1cfb51a7973c2d5926b75f607f33897b96c403ca" alt="204"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4520e/4520e8b7c352475a5826ff7552c1e29780e9336e" alt="205"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7082/f70823f7c16120d9077d844a59f4f7dc27b10c9f" alt="206"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5a26/d5a26d485c49a38974c9b55ce0bd7b503e608f72" alt="207"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e762/9e762f3a696681ad8d327485e5f718c9df0336f7" alt="208"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80000/8000005aa3cb42c6d117af3f25ef2a7fa6cc5183" alt="209"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d36a7/d36a747670173256ec070b31b71b540348b04239" alt="210"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f593d/f593d37806ab455ebbd23812a58d8ccc109d3ea6" alt="211"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ba11/3ba114c22064b0e5042eda7204ca39017da0bf01" alt="212"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06558/065589ebd652c2b578126bc91b7e55f3e60fcc08" alt="213"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccf2b/ccf2b2eff2566e33da8c78f99c6d3d13042a3126" alt="214"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a27b5/a27b52ccf5889ad08590e5f71f053479e73c43e3" alt="215"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2f96/e2f96b5e553b59090e5be5456979c736a3e4f83d" alt="216"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c91bf/c91bf26cf36ae1ef34bb23864470630882514464" alt="217"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Blough P. M. Selective attention and search images in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1991 Jul;17(3):292–298. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.17.3.292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- COOMBS C. H. On the use of inconsistency of preferences in psychological measurement. J Exp Psychol. 1958 Jan;55(1):1–7. doi: 10.1037/h0044694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- COOMBS C. H. Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement. Psychol Rev. 1950 May;57(3):145–158. doi: 10.1037/h0060984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Killeen P. R. Incentive theory: IV. Magnitude of reward. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):407–417. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lea S. E., Roper T. J. Demand for food on fixed-ratio schedules as a function of the quality of concurrently available reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Mar;27(2):371–380. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller H. L. Matching-based hedonic scaling in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):335–347. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shettleworth S. J. Handling time and choice in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Sep;44(2):139–155. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Svartdal F. Working harder for less: effect of incentive value on force of instrumental response in humans. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1993 Feb;46(1):11–34. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]