Abstract
Vegetative insecticidal proteins (Vip) are produced by Bacillus thuringiensis during its vegetative growth stage. Vip3 proteins play a significant role in the insecticidal activity of B. thuringiensis against a wide spectrum of economically important crop pests. In this study, 163 B. thuringiensis strains were screened for the presence of vip3 using a polymerase chain reaction-based approach. Seventeen (10.43%) strains yielded an amplification product for vip3. Ten of these strains exhibited larvicidal activity against second-instar larvae of Spodoptera litura, Spodoptera exigua, and Spodoptera frugiperda, with corrected mortality rate ranging from 18.30% to 100%. JC20 exhibited the highest efficacy against the three Spodoptera species, achieving corrected mortality rates of 98.30% for S. litura and both 100% for S. exigua and S. frugiperda. Given its potency, JC20 was further characterized to identify its unique features and to assess its potential as a bioinsecticide. Scanning electron microscopy revealed the presence of bipyramidal crystal proteins in JC20, correlating with this strain harboring cry1D and cry2A. The vip3 gene of JC20 was cloned and sequenced. The complete 2,370 bp sequence was subsequently named Vip3Aa94 by the Bacterial Pesticidal Protein Database. The size of Vip3Aa94, determined via sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was approximately 90 kDa. Broad-spectrum efficacy for Vip3Aa94 was established against the second—instar of S. frugiperda, S. exigua, and S. litura, with low LC50 values of 67.38, 81.97, and 147.92 ng/cm2, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis based on the Vip3Aa94 sequence indicated that geographic separation led to the divergence of vip3, consistent with its distinct features compared with other B. thuringiensis strains globally. This study highlights JC20, with its high insecticidal activity, as a promising candidate for controlling Spodoptera pests.
Keywords: Biocontrol agent, Bacillus thuringiensis, Vip3 gene, Insecticidal activity, Spodoptera spp.
Introduction
The genus Spodoptera includes some of the most significant insect crop pest species that are highly polyphagous. The larvae of these insects feed on more than 100 host plants, including rice, maize, cotton, and various vegetables (Goergen et al., 2016; Cheng et al., 2017). Spodoptera exigua (Hübner), Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith), and Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) are the three most important crop pest species in this genus. Spodoptera frugiperda, commonly known as the fall armyworm, is an invasive pest that was first detected in Thailand in 2018 (IPPC, 2018). It causes 25–40% reduction in maize yield, potentially increasing the country’s overall production costs by an estimated 26–52 million USD per annum (Thirawut et al., 2023).
The extensive use of insecticides to control agricultural pests often leads to the contamination of crops with toxic residues, harm to non-target organisms, and development of insecticide resistance in insect pests (Che et al., 2013; Hilliou et al., 2021). As an alternative, microbial insecticide products based on spores and crystal proteins of the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) have been used for years to control insect pests (Fiuza et al., 2017). Bt produces a diverse array of insecticidal proteins, including crystal (Cry) proteins, cytolytic (Cyt) proteins, and secreted insecticidal proteins such as vegetative insecticidal proteins (Vip), which act against the larvae of various insect species (Crickmore et al., 2021). Vip proteins are synthesized by Bt during the vegetative growth and sporulation phases, and are subsequently secreted into the culture medium (Chakroun et al., 2012). Based on their amino acid sequence similarity, these proteins are classified into four families: Vpb1, Vpa2, Vip3, and Vpb4 (Crickmore et al., 2021). The Vip3 family comprises three subfamilies, Vip3A, Vip3B, and Vip3C, which are recognized for their potent insecticidal activity, especially against a wide range of lepidopterans (Estruch et al., 1996; Palma et al., 2013).
Studies on the insecticidal properties of Vip3 have primarily focused on Vip3A, which shows broad-spectrum activity against lepidopteran pests (Milne et al., 2008) by interacting with more receptors in the midgut than those targeted by Cry proteins (Lee, Miles & Chen, 2006; Liu et al., 2011; Gouffon et al., 2011), leading to pore formation (Lee et al., 2003) and subsequent cell lysis (Yu et al., 1997). This unique mode of action makes Vip3A a valuable tool for managing insect resistance, either independently or in combination with Cry proteins.
Since the identification of Vip3Aa, researchers have extensively screened Bt collections for novel vip3 genes, and have greatly expanded the vip3 family with many new members (Loguercio et al., 2002; Mesrati, Tounsi & Jaoua, 2005; Hernández-Rodríguez et al., 2009; Palma et al., 2013; Sauka & Benintende, 2017; Hemthanon, Promdonkoy & Boonserm, 2023). However, information regarding vip3 genes in Thai Bt collections remains limited. This study was aimed at screening and identifying vip3 genes from Bt strains collected in Thailand and evaluating their potential as biocontrol agents with high larvicidal activity against S. exigua, S. litura, and S. frugiperda based on their biochemical properties, morphological traits, protein profiles, and cry gene content.
Materials & Methods
Bacillus thuringiensis strains
The 163 Bt strains used in this study were originally isolated from diverse ecological sources across various regions of Thailand (Table 1, Fig. 1) (Attathom et al., 1995; Thaphan, Keawsompong & Chanpaisaeng, 2008; Lertwiriyawonga et al., 2010). Furthermore, B. thuringiensis subsp. aizawai (XenTari® Biological Insecticide) was used as a reference strain. All the strains were maintained for long-term storage at −20 °C in nutrient broth (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) supplemented with 30% glycerol in the culture collection of the Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Thailand.
Table 1. Geographical origins and samples sources containing Bacillus thuringiensis strains in Thailand.
| Geographical origins | Source of samples | Total number of strains | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil | Stem borer cadaver | Rice bran | ||
| North | 15 | 0 | 13 | 28 |
| North-East | 17 | 1 | 10 | 28 |
| Central | 14 | 1 | 15 | 30 |
| East | 16 | 0 | 7 | 23 |
| West | 9 | 0 | 14 | 23 |
| South | 25 | 0 | 6 | 31 |
| Total (strains) | 96 | 2 | 65 | 163 |
Figure 1. Geographical origins of Bacillus thuringiensis strains in Thailand.
Thailand boundary was obtained from Land Development Department, Thailand. The Geographical origins as point locations presenting in the map were calculated the centroid of polygons using Geometry tools in program QGIS v.3.40.
Screening of vip3 gene by polymerase chain reaction
Genomic DNA was extracted from the Bt strains using the PureLink™ Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Detection of the vip3-type gene was performed using the primer pair Vip3F (5′-ACATCC TCCCTACACTTTCTAATAC-3′) and Vip3R (5′-TCTTCTATGGACCCGTTC TCTAC-3′) (Espinasse et al., 2003), which amplifies a 678 bp product. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out in a total reaction volume of 50 µL. Each PCR mixture contained 3 µL of DNA template, 1.25 U of Taq DNA polymerase (invitrogen), 5 µL of 10X reaction buffer, 3 µL of 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 µL of 10 mM each dNTP, and 1 µL of 10 mM of each primer. The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 45 °C for 45 s, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min. The final extension was performed at 72 °C for 10 min. The amplified products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel. The Bt strains confirmed to harbor a vip3 gene were selected for further determination of insecticidal activity.
Determination of larvicidal activity of Vip3 protein
Insect colonies
Eggs of S. litura, S. exigua, and S. frugiperda obtained from the National Science and Technology Development Agency, Thailand. Newly hatched larvae were gently transferred to a semisynthetic diet composed of dried bean, ascorbic acid, methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate, sorbic acid, B vitamins, wheat germ, yeast extract, and agar (Güney et al., 2019). Feeding activity after hatching was confirmed by direct visual observation of larval movement and feeding marks on the diet surface (Sanané et al., 2021). Larvae that failed to initiate feeding or showed signs of starvation were excluded from subsequent bioassays. The remaining larvae were reared on the diet until they reached the second-instar for use in bioassays (Idrees et al., 2023). Insect colonies were maintained under controlled environmental conditions (25 ± 2 °C, 70 ± 10% relative humidity, and a 16:8 h light:dark photoperiod) in the insectaries at the Research and Lifelong Learning Center on Urban and Environmental Entomology, Thailand. All experimental procedures involving insect specimens adhered to the ethical guidelines established by the Thai Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) (license No. ACKU68-AGR-005).
Preparation of supernatants from Bacillus thuringiensis for screening and quantitation of Vip3
Vip3-positive B. thuringiensis strains were inoculated in Luria-Bertani broth (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and cultured at 37 °C for 16–18 h. Five milliliter of this culture was subsequently inoculated in five mL of Terrific Broth (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), which was then grown for 48 h. The culture was centrifuged at 12,000×g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the resulting supernatant containing Vip3 was collected (Sattar et al., 2008). The supernatant was concentrated by centrifugal ultrafiltration (Vivaspin® 500, Merck), which resulted in the removal of proteins with a molecular weight less than 30 kDa, including cytolytic proteins. Total protein concentration was determined using the Bradford method (Bradford, 1976); a calibration curve was prepared using bovine serum albumin as a standard protein. The standard and test samples were transferred to a 96-well microplate, and the absorbance was measured at 595 nm using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad).
Toxins, specifically Vip3 and other exotoxins, are secreted into the supernatant during the vegetative phase. Because Vip3 is a heat-sensitive protein, a parallel experiment was conducted to confirm whether the larvicidal activity was due to Vip3 alone and not due to the exotoxins. Autoclaved (121 °C for 15 min) and unautoclaved supernatants were tested using the same procedure based on the rationale that larvicidal activity observed for the autoclaved supernatant would suggest that the toxicity was not caused by Vip3 alone.
Larvicidal activity of Vip3 against Spodoptera pests
Second-instar larvae of S. litura, S. exigua, and S. frugiperda were used to test the activity of culture supernatants containing secreted Vip3A. This stage was selected for its consistent feeding behavior, ease of handling, and high sensitivity to Bt toxins, which collectively enhance experimental sensitivity and reproducibility (Hellmich et al., 2001). Furthermore, second-instar larvae are generally used in toxicity bioassays as they minimize the physiological variability and increased toxin tolerance often observed in later instars (Idrees et al., 2022).
The larvicidal activity was assessed by applying 100 µL of unautoclaved and autoclaved culture supernatant onto the surface of a semisynthetic diet (two cm2 multiwell plates). After the supernatant had dried, second-instar larvae of each Spodoptera species were added to different wells. Sixty larvae were tested for each Bt strain.
All experiments were conducted in triplicate under laboratory conditions (25 ± 2 °C and 70–80% relative humidity). Larvae were considered dead when no signs of movement were observed after they were prodded with a sterile stick (Dulmage et al., 1990). Mortality was further confirmed when larvae failed to respond to repeated stimulation over an extended observation period, allowing for true mortality to be distinguished from thanatosis. Mortality rates were assessed by recording the number of dead larvae 24, 48, and 72 h after the bacterial suspension was applied. The percentage of larval mortality was corrected for the control mortality using the Abbott’s formula (Abbott, 1925).
Morphology of crystal protein
For examining the morphology of crystal proteins, spore-crystal suspensions were placed on coverslips and air-dried on aluminum mounts. The samples were subsequently coated with a thin layer of platinum using a sputter coater (Quorum Q150R ES). Finally, the dried samples were imaged using a Hitachi SU8020 scanning electron microscope (SU8020 FE-SEM; HITACHI Ltd., Chiyoda City, Tokyo, Japan) at an acceleration voltage of 5 kV.
Biochemical characterization
The biochemical characteristics of B. thuringiensis strain were examined using the API 50CHB system (BioMérieux, Mérieux Étoile, France). A single colony from each strain was selected and emulsified in inoculating fluid for subsequent inoculation in a microplate test. The inoculum was prepared for a specified transmittance using a turbidity meter, as specified in the user guide by Logan & Berkeley (1984).
Detection of the cry gene
PCR was performed using specific primers to identify the following lepidopteran toxin-coding genes: cry1Aa, cry1Ab, cry1Ac, cry1Ad, cry1Ae, cry1B, cry1C, cry1D, cry1E, cry1F, cry1G, cry1H, cry1I, cry1J, cry1K, cry2A, cry5, cry12, and cry13A (Juarez-Perez, Ferrandis & Frutos, 1997; Bravo et al., 1998; Masson et al., 1998; Ejiofor & Johnson, 2002; Porcar et al., 2014). The amplification was performed under the following conditions: denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of amplification, with each cycle comprising denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing, at a temperature dependent on the primer set used, for 45 s, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min. PCR products were analyzed by 1% agarose electrophoresis. PCR product for each cry gene was purified using the QIAquick® PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and sent to Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea) for DNA sequencing.
Complete sequence of the vip3 gene
Genomic DNA from the high-toxicity Bt strain was used for amplifying the open reading frame of the vip3 gene. This was achieved using specific primers designed for this purpose (Şahin et al., 2018): forward (5′-CGCGGATCCATCGAAGGTCGTATGAACAAG AATAATACTAAAT-3′) and reverse (5′-AAGGAAAAAGCGGCCGCTTACTTAATAGAG ACATCGTAA-3′). The PCR mixture comprised 25 µL of 2X PCRBIO Taq Mix Red (PCR Biosystems, UK), 2 µL of each primer (10 pmol/µL), 10 µg of genomic DNA template, and nuclease-free water in a final volume of 50 µL. PCR amplification was performed using a T100™ Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 96 °C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 96 °C for 40 s, annealing at 50 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The resulting PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel stained with RedSafe (iNtRON Biotechnology, Seongnam-si, South Korea) in 0.5X TAE buffer (0.02 M Tris base, 0.01 M acetic acid, 0.5 mM EDTA pH 8.0) at 100 V for 30 min. A GeneRuler 100 bp plus DNA ladder (Thermo Scientific) was used as a molecular size marker. The DNA bands were visualized using a Gel Doc system (Syngene).
The amplified PCR products were subjected to Sanger sequencing. The obtained sequences were compared with those in the GenBank database to determine the percentage of similarity (% Max Identity) and sequence variation. ClustalW (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw/) was used for multiple sequence alignment of the partial vip3 sequence. The resulting nucleotide sequence served as a template for primer design to facilitate gene walking and obtain the complete gene sequence.
Expression and purification of Vip3 in Escherichia coli
The complete vip3 sequence was synthesized, cloned, and purified by GenScript (Piscataway, NJ, USA). Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) competent cells were transformed with the pET30a(+) vector and cultured overnight at 37 °C on LB agar containing kanamycin (30 µg/mL). The transformed bacterial colonies were selected and inoculated in LB medium containing 30 µg/mL kanamycin and grown until the optical density at 600 nm (OD 600) reached 0.6–0.8. Protein expression was induced with 1.0 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 15 °C for 16 h. Cell pellets were obtained by centrifugation at 6,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C and sonicated in lysis buffer (50mM Tris, 300mM NaCl, and 7.5% glycerol [pH 8.0], and 1 mg/mL lysozyme). The lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was purified using a Ni-NTA column.
The target protein was eluted with an elution buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM imidazole, pH 8.0) and subsequently dialyzed against storage buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, pH 8.0). The purity and amount of Vip3 were determined by electrophoresing on a sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel (Laemmli, 1970), followed by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (Sigma–Aldrich).
Evaluating the toxicity of Vip3 insecticidal protein
To investigate the potential of the purified Vip3, the LC5 0 and LC90 were determined using surface contamination assays at five concentrations: 100, 1,000, 2,500, 5,000, and 10,000 ng/mL. The Vip3Aa94 protein was diluted with 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline, which also served as the control. For the assays, 100 µL of each concentration was applied onto an artificial diet in 1.9 cm2 multiwell plates. Once the protein solution was completely absorbed, a single of second-instar larvae was placed into each well, resulting in 24 larvae for each concentration. The bioassay was conducted with three independent replicates, reaching a total sample size of 72 larvae per treatment. The experiment of each insect pest (S. litura, S. exigua, and S. frugiperda) was replicate three times under the aforementioned laboratory conditions. Larval mortality was recorded daily for three consecutive days (at 24 h interval). The accumulated number of dead larvae for each Vip3 protein concentration was used to calculate the corrected mortality using Abbott’s formula (Abbott, 1925).
Phylogenetic analysis of vip3 sequences
Phylogenetic relationship among Bt strains was inferred using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) approaches. Before constructing the phylogenetic trees, the best-fit evolution models of nucleotide substitution were selected using the Kakusan4 program (Tanabe, 2007). The selection was based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) (Akaike, 1974) for ML analysis and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) (Schwarz, 1978) for BI analysis. Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were performed using IQ-TREE v2.2.2.7 (Minh et al., 2020). Nodal support was assessed with 10,000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates (UFBoot) (Hoang et al., 2018). The resulting phylogenetic trees were visualized and edited using FigTree v1.4.4. Branches with bootstrap values of at least 70% were considered to be well-supported clades, following the criteria of Huelsenbeck & Hillis (1993).
Bayesian phylogenetic inference was conducted using MrBayes version 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al., 2012), employing the Metropolis-coupled Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm. Two independent runs, each with four chains, were executed in parallel for 100,000 generations, with trees sampled every 1,000 generations. The first 25% of the sampled trees were excluded as “burn-in” to ensure the stabilization of the posterior distribution. A majority-rule consensus tree topology was generated from the remaining trees to assess the phylogenetic topology and posterior probabilities of the clades (Huelsenbeck & Ronquist, 2001).
Nodes with a posterior probability value greater than 0.94 were considered strongly supported (Larget & Simon, 1999). To root the phylogenetic tree, two vip sequences from Bt strains, strain 376 vip1 (GenBank accession number GU992203.1) and Sbt009 vip4 (accession no. HM044666.1) were included as outgroup taxa. These sequences, which were derived from more distantly related clades, were selected to provide appropriate rooting and context for interpreting the relationships between the vip3 genes.
Statistical analysis
The toxicity of B. thuringiensis against Spodoptera species was evaluated based on the corrected mortality (%) among 10 Bt strains using one-way analysis of variance at a 99% significance level. Tukey’s post-hoc test was used to identify the Bt strains that showed statistically significant differences in toxicity. Mortality rates were expressed as the mean ± SE%. All statistical analyses were conducted using the Jamovi software (version 2.3.28). The estimation of LC50 values was conducted using Probit analysis (Finney, 1971) in IBM SPSS software (version 25). Differences between LC50 values were considered statistically significant when their fiducial limits did not overlap.
Results
PCR-based screening of vip3
Genomic DNA from 163 Bt strains was subjected to PCR amplification using screening primers designed from conserved regions within the vip3 gene. The expected size of the PCR product was approximately 678 bp. Seventeen (10.43%) Bt strains—JC1, JC20, JC39, JC43, JC68, JC81, JC128, JC235, JC247, JC353, JC354, JC356, JC397, JC399, JC400, JC406, and JC414—yielded an amplification product for vip3, whereas the remaining 146 (89.57%) strains did not. Among the 17 vip3-positive Bt strains, eight (47.06%) were isolated from soil samples and rice bran, whereas one strain was obtained from an insect source. Most vip3-positive strains were geographically isolated from northern Thailand.
Larvicidal activities of Vip3 against Spodoptera pests
The larvicidal activity of the 17 Bt strains against the second-instar larvae of S. litura, S. exigua, and S. frugiperda was evaluated using an artificial diet that included Vip3 containing supernatant. Of the 17 vip3-positive Bt strains, seven (JC1, JC39, JC68, JC247, JC354, JC400, and JC406) did not cause mortality in S. litura, S. exigua, and S. frugiperda. These results were consistent with those for the standard strain B. thuringiensis subsp. aizawai. Ten vip3-positive Bt strains, with protein concentrations, as determined using the Bradford method, ranging from a low of 1.59 mg/mL in strain JC20 to a high of 1.86 mg/mL in JC81, were found to exhibit larvicidal activity. Despite having a lower protein concentration, JC20 exhibited a significantly higher corrected mortality rate than the other vip3-positive Bt strains (P < 0.001). It achieved corrected mortality rates of 98.30 ± 1.67% against S. litura and both 100% against S. exigua and S. frugiperda. JC81 and JC397 were the second and third most effective strains, with high corrected mortality rates ranging from 70.00% to 78.30% against the three Spodoptera pests. In contrast, JC43 caused the lowest mortality, with rates of 20.00 ± 2.46% for S. litura, 35.00 ± 5.00% for S. exigua, and 35.00 ± 6.09% for S. frugiperda. Based on its superior performance, JC20 was selected for further investigation (Table 2). The autoclaved supernatants from the 17 vip3-positive Bt strains did not cause insect mortality. This indicated that the larvicidal activity observed in the non-autoclaved supernatants was due to a heat-sensitive molecule, likely Vip3 Protein.
Table 2. Bacillus thuringiensis caused a corrected mortality rate in Spodoptera species after 72 h of exposure to an artificial diet containing a Vip3 protein supernatant.
| Bt strain | Protein concentration (mg/mL) | Corrected Mortality (%) (mean ± SE)* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. litura | S. exigua | S. frugiperda | ||
| JC20 | 1.59 | 98.30 ± 1.67a | 100.00 ± 0.00a | 100.00 ± 0.00a |
| JC43 | 1.61 | 20.00 ± 2.46d | 35.00 ± 5.00c | 35.00 ± 6.09cd |
| JC81 | 1.86 | 70.00 ± 3.81b | 78.30 ± 2.97b | 73.30 ± 2.84b |
| JC128 | 1.62 | 53.30 ± 5.69bc | 56.70 ± 4.82bc | 36.70 ± 4.82cd |
| JC235 | 1.77 | 23.30 ± 4.82d | 41.70 ± 3.86c | 18.30 ± 4.58d |
| JC353 | 1.80 | 23.30 ± 5.95d | 40.00 ± 4.26c | 40.00 ± 4.92cd |
| JC356 | 1.71 | 23.30 ± 5.41d | 40.00 ± 5.50c | 41.70 ± 5.75c |
| JC397 | 1.67 | 65.00 ± 5.57b | 63.30 ± 3.33b | 56.70 ± 4.14bc |
| JC399 | 1.83 | 43.30 ± 5.95bcd | 40.00 ± 6.03c | 43.30 ± 5.41c |
| JC414 | 1.65 | 58.30 ± 7.16bc | 65.00 ± 4.35b | 41.10 ± 5.75c |
| ANOVA | F | 25.8 | 23.7 | 23.4 |
| df | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| p | <.001 | <.001 | <.001 | |
Notes.
Different lowercase letters after the means of corrected mortality (%) within each Spodoptera species indicate a significant difference (p < 0.01) by Tukey’s post hoc test.
Morphology and biochemical characterization of crystal protein
Scanning electron microscopy revealed that JC20 was a rod-shaped cell capable of producing oval spores and bipyramidal crystals with distinct small and large forms (Fig. 2). The biochemical profiles of JC20 are presented in Table 3. JC20 exhibited slight differences from B. thuringiensis subsp. aizawai. It is capable of fermenting L-arabinose sugar but not D-raffinose and beta-gentiobiose. Based on the API kit database and these biochemical characteristics, JC20 was identified as B. thuringiensis with 99.9% shared identity.
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy of spores and crystal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis strains JC20.
Abbreviations: bp, bi-pyramidal crystal; sp, spore.
Table 3. Biochemical profiles of Bacillus thuringiensis strains JC20 compared with the reference strain Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. aizawai.
| Test | JC20 | aizawai | Test | JC20 | aizawai |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycerol | + | + | Salicin | + | + |
| Erythritol | – | – | Cellobiose | + | + |
| D-Arabinose | – | – | Maltose | + | + |
| L-Arabinose | + | – | Lactose | – | – |
| Ribose | + | + | Melibiose | – | – |
| D-xylose | – | – | Sucrose | – | – |
| L-xylose | – | – | Trehalose | + | + |
| Adonitol | – | – | Inulin | – | – |
| Beta-Methylxyloside | – | – | Melezitose | – | – |
| Galactose | – | – | D-Raffinose | – | + |
| D-Glucose | + | + | Starch | + | + |
| D-Fructose | + | + | Glycogen | + | + |
| D-Mannose | – | – | Xylitol | – | – |
| L-Sorbose | – | – | Beta-Gentiobiose | – | + |
| Rhamnose | – | – | D-Turanose | – | – |
| Dulcitol | – | – | D-Lyxose | – | – |
| Inositol | – | – | D-Tagatose | – | – |
| Mannitol | – | – | D-Fucose | – | – |
| Sorbitol | – | – | L-Fucose | – | – |
| Alpha-Methyl-D-mannoside | – | – | D-Arabitol | – | – |
| Alpha-Methyl –D-glucoside | – | – | L-Arabitol | – | – |
| N-Acethylglucosamine | + | + | Gluconate | + | + |
| Amygdalin | + | + | 2-Ketogluconate | – | – |
| Arbutin | + | + | 5-Ketogluconate | – | – |
| Esculin | + | + |
Notes.
Key
- +
- positive reaction
- –
- negative reaction
Determination of the cry gene content
PCR analysis of JC20 using specific primers for cry genes revealed the presence of cry1D and cry2A. All PCR products were cloned, sequenced, and subjected to Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. Sequence comparisons with other cry genes in the database showed that the cry1D and cry2A sequences from JC20 were highly homologous to the sequences of cry1Db (AF358862.1) and cry2Ab (JN226103.1), with identities of 99.62% and 95.82%, respectively.
Complete sequence of vip3
JC20 was selected for complete sequencing of its vip3 gene because of its high toxicity against Spodoptera species in bioassays with the supernatant. The sequence of the primer designed for PCR walking was 5′-AAC AAG TGG CAG TGA AGT AGG-3′. The PCR product for each vip3 gene was cloned and sequenced to obtain a complete sequence of 2,370 bp. Sequence comparison with other vip3 genes using the BlAST-N program in the NCBI database showed that these sequences have a high homology to the Vip3Aa17 sequence, with approximately 99.9% identity. The nucleotide sequence was deposited in GenBank (accession number: PV339976). The protein was named Vip3Aa94 by Neil Crickmore (The Bacterial Pesticidal Protein Resource Center database, https://bpprc.org/).
Expression and purification of Vip3 in E. coli
The protein encoded by vip3Aa94 was expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) following IPTG induction. The molecular weight of the expressed protein was approximately 90 kDa, as expected (Fig. 3), which corresponded to that of Vip3.
Figure 3. SDS-PAGE gel showing protein expression of Vip3Aa94.
Lane M: Precision Plus Protein Standards (Bio-Rad). Lane 1: Vip3 protein expressed and purified using a Ni-NTA column. The arrow indicates the putative vegetative insecticidal protein (Vip3) at ∼85 kDa.
Evaluating the toxicity of Vip3Aa94 insecticidal protein
The toxicity of Vip3Aa94 insecticidal protein from B. thuringiensis JC20 against three species of Spodoptera was examined using probit analysis. The protein Vip3Aa94 exhibited the highest toxicity to S. frugiperda, with LC50 and LC90 value of 67.38 ng/cm2 and 607.68 ng/cm2, respectively. In contrast, S. litura was the least susceptible, with LC50 and LC90 value of 147.92 ng/cm2 and 938 ng/cm2, respectively. For the LC50, the 95% fiducial limits of S. frugiperda were non-overlapping with those of S. lituta, showing that the toxicity against S. frugiperda was higher than against S. litura. Additionally, no heterogeneity effect of Vip3Aa94 was observed among individual S. frugiperda larvae (χ2 = 21.05, p = 0.072), which indicates that the tested population responded uniformly to the toxin (Fig. 4, Table S1).
Figure 4. Lethal concentrations of Vip3Aa94 insecticidal protein from Bacillus thuringiensis JC20, against three Spodoptera species at 3 days post-application.
Phylogenetic analysis of vip3 sequences
Phylogenetic analysis of the vip3Aa94 nucleotide sequences revealed the formation of three well-defined clades, designated Clusters A, B, and C (Fig. 5). These clusters were moderately to strongly supported by Bayesian posterior probability values ranging from 0.7 to 0.9. The vip3Aa94 sequence from B. thuringiensis strain JC20 (GenBank number PV339976) was assigned to Cluster C, which was further divided into two subclades, indicating a more complex evolutionary structure within this lineage.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic relationships among Vip3 protein gene sequences of Bacillus thuringiensis inferred using the maximum likelihood (ML) method.
Support values at nodes are shown as Bayesian posterior probabilities (BI) and ML bootstrap values (BS), presented as BI/ML. The scale bar represents the number of substitutions per site.
Interestingly, JC20 showed phylogenetic divergence from the sequences grouped in Clusters A and B. Within Cluster C, JC20 vip3 was positioned distinctly apart from the Indian isolates (e.g., KU522245.1). It was rather more closely related to sequences from China (HM447188.1) and Spain (HQ414237.1), as well as to vip3D sequences from China (DQ054848.1). This pattern is indicative of a possible regional association or horizontal gene transfer event that could contribute to the observed genetic similarity among geographically distant strains.
Discussion
Thailand is recognized for harboring a high diversity of Bt strains (Thaphan, Keawsompong & Chanpaisaeng, 2008; Lertwiriyawonga et al., 2010). Globally, numerous B. thuringiensis serovars have been described, including thailandensis and chanpaisis, which were originally isolated in Thailand (Lecadet et al., 1999; Rajchanuwong, Chanpaisaeng & Kaewsompong, 2019). Previous studies demonstrated substantial diversity in the cry gene content of Thai Bt strains, harboring toxins effective against lepidopteran and dipteran pests. The discovery of the less widespread cry32 gene, specifically toxic to mosquito larvae, further highlights this regional genetic richness (Thammasittirong & Attathom, 2008; Boonmee, Thammasittirong & Thammasittirong, 2019; Rajchanuwong, Chanpaisaeng & Kaewsompong, 2019; Rajchanuwong et al., 2025).
Vip3 proteins differ from Cry proteins in their binding sites and modes of action and are effective against a wide range of lepidopteran pests (Ferré et al., 2023). Although vip 3 genes have been extensively investigated in Bt collections worldwide, reports from Thailand remain limited, underscoring the importance of further characterization of vip 3-harboring Thai Bt strains.
This study screened 163 Bt strains collected from various regions and ecological sources in Thailand. Of these, only 17 strains (10.43%) tested positive for the vip 3 gene. This relatively low frequency indicated that vip 3 genes are present but not widespread in Thai Bt populations. This pattern is consistent with previous reports from Thailand (Thaphan, Keawsompong & Chanpaisaeng, 2008; Boonmee, Thammasittirong & Thammasittirong, 2019; Hemthanon, Promdonkoy & Boonserm, 2023).
Considerable variation in vip 3 gene frequency has been reported among Bt collections worldwide, ranging from high prevalence to low or undetectable levels (Table 4). Such variation is influenced by multiple biological factors and environmental factors, including horizontal gene transfer, ecological conditions, and geographic isolation. Bacillus thuringiensis strains are known to exchange genetic material, such as cry and vip genes, via horizontal gene transfer (González Jr, Brown & Carlton, 1982; Ehling-Schulz, Lereclus & Koehler, 2019; Hinnekens et al., 2022). However, limitations in gene exchange—imposed by geography, environmental conditions, and transfer mechanisms—can lead to the accumulation of distinct cry/vip gene combinations within regional Bt populations over time (Thomas et al., 2000; Vilas-Boas et al., 2002; Patel, Purani & Ingle, 2013; Hinnekens et al., 2022). Consequently, environmental factors and geographic isolation may further shape the distribution and diversity of Bt toxin genes by favoring strains that produce Cry/Vip toxins effective against locally prevalent pests (Uribe, Martinez & Ceron, 2003; Patel, Purani & Ingle, 2013).
Table 4. vip3—type gene distribution in Bacillus thuringiensis isolates from different countries.
| Country of Bt collection | Gene size (bp) |
Vip3 Gene frequency (%) | Number of isolates/strains | Ecological source | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 678 | 10.42 | 163 | Soil and rice bran | This study |
| Thailand | 1,591 | 47.55 | 511 | Soil | Boonmee, Thammasittirong & Thammasittirong (2019) |
| Thailand | 21.42 | 42 | Not mentioned | Hemthanon, Promdonkoy & Boonserm (2023) | |
| Sri Lanka | 1,029 | 42 | 21 | Soil | Baragamaarachchi et al. (2019) |
| Turkish | 1,395 | 23 | 80 | Soil, fruits, and fig leaves | Şahin et al. (2018) |
| India | 1,400 | 40 | 15 | Soil from tea and rice field | Rabha, Acharjee & Sarmah (2018) |
| Argentia | 608 | 91.3 | 268 | Soil, spider web, leaves, dust, dead larvae | Sauka & Benintende (2017) |
| India | 700 | 43.18 | 44 | Lake sediments, forest soil, and maize field | Lone et al. (2016) |
| India | 675 | 5.33 | 150 | Soil/infected insects | Rangeshwaran et al. (2016) |
| Tunisia | 670–2,370 | 30 | 212 | Soil | Sellami et al. (2013) |
| Spain | 364, 444 | 14.5 | 400 | Soil samples, barn dust, and aquatic environments. | Palma et al. (2013) |
| China | 364, 444 | 67.4 | 2,134 | Soil from Mountain, Forest Farmland and snowcapped mountain | Yu et al. (2011) |
| Spain and Bolivia | 1,621 | 48.9 | 507 | Soil, dust, grain | Hernández-Rodríguez et al. (2009) |
| Australia | 1,621 | 87 | 187 | Soil, bird nest, and grain dust | Beard et al. (2008) |
| Iran | 1,000 | 82.6 | 70 | Soil, leaf samples, and dead insects | Seifinejad et al. (2008) |
| Tunisia | 419 | 30 | 259 | Soil | Mesrati, Tounsi & Jaoua (2005) |
| France and 31 countries of 5 continents |
678 | 52.8 | 125 | Soil, plants, animal waste, dust, insects, etc. | Espinasse et al. (2003) |
| Brazil | 150, 1,210 | 100 | 12 | Soil | Loguercio et al. (2002) |
| India | 700 | 2 | 49 | Soil | Selvapandiyan et al. (2001) |
In addition to biological factors and environmental factors, methodological variation is recognized as a major contributor to differences in reported vip 3 gene frequencies. Differences in primer design, PCR conditions, and sampling strategies can substantially influence detection outcomes, thereby limiting direct comparisons among surveys (Porcar & Juárez-Pérez, 2003). Even when similar primers and PCR conditions are applied, variation in vip gene frequencies has been observed within the same geographic region, highlighting the combined influence of technical factors and underlying biological diversity (Boonmee, Thammasittirong & Thammasittirong, 2019).
In this study, vip 3-positive Bt strains were more frequently associated with isolates originating from soil- and rice bran–derived samples in northern Thailand. This distribution is consistent with previous reports identifying northern and northeastern Thailand as regions with relatively higher occurrence of vip 3 (Boonmee, Thammasittirong & Thammasittirong, 2019). Collectively, these findings indicated that vip 3 gene distribution reflects an interaction between ecological context and research methodology, underscoring the importance of region-specific screening to discovery potent Bt strains for integrated pest management.
The larvicidal activity of the 17 vip3-positive Bt strains was assessed against S. exigua, S. litura, and S. frugiperda, revealing marked variation in toxicity among the isolates. Notably, JC20 proved to be highly effective, causing 100% corrected mortality against S. exigua and S. frugiperda and 98.30% against S. litura. The high potency observed in this study exceeds the 90% mortality in S. exigua reported for the Bt 6A supernatant containing Vip3Aa (Şahin et al., 2018), as well as the 86.6% and 83.3% mortality rates against S. littoralis achieved by Vip3 proteins from B. thuringiensis BnBt and MnD isolates, respectively (Güney et al., 2019). Consequently, JC20 exhibited substantially higher insecticidal activity than the other vip 3-positive strains, identifying it as a highly promising Vip3-producing Bt strain.
The vip 3 gene from JC20 was deposited in GenBank (accession no. PV339976) and designated as Vip3Aa94 by the Bacterial Pesticidal Protein Resource Center (Crickmore et al., 2025). The Vip3Aa94 protein exhibited strong insecticidal activity against second-instar larvae of S. frugiperda, S. exigua, and S. litura, as evidenced by low LC5 0 values. When compared using standardized LC5 0 units, Vip3Aa94 from JC20 demonstrated higher or comparable toxicity than several known variants. Notably, Vip3Aa94 was more effective than Vip3Ab, Vip3Aa16, Vip3Aa45, Vip3Aa58, and Vip3Aa59, all of which generally exhibited higher LC5 0 values against neonate S. exigua than those observed for Vip3Aa94 against the older second-instar larvae in this study (Chakroun et al., 2012; De Escudero et al., 2014; Palma et al., 2013; Baranek et al., 2015). Similarly, Vip3Ab exhibited lower activity against neonate S. frugiperda (De Escudero et al., 2014) than Vip3Aa94. Regarding later larval stages, other Vip3 proteins have also shown reduced insecticidal activity against S. exigua and S. litura (Song et al., 2016; Nutaratat et al., 2023). Such disparities in larval susceptibility are well documented; later-instar lepidopteran larvae generally exhibit increased tolerance to Bt toxins compared with early instars (Gujar et al., 2007; Valadez-Lira et al., 2012; George & Crickmore, 2012; Janmaat, Bergmann & Ericsson, 2014). Accordingly, the lower LC5 0 values observed in this study demonstrated the potent insecticidal activity of Vip3Aa94, establishing JC20 as a primary candidate for further molecular characterization and development in lepidopteran pest management.
Seven Bt strains did not cause mortality in S. litura, S. exigua, or S. frugiperda, although vip3 was detected in them. This was possibly due to the use of general primers for vip3 detection. Currently, 140 Vip3 proteins have been described (Crickmore et al., 2025) and classified into three subfamilies: Vip3A (Estruch et al., 1996), Vip3B (Rang et al., 2005), and Vip3C (Palma et al., 2012). Vip3A proteins are known for their insecticidal activity against a wide variety of lepidopterans, including species that are less susceptible to some Cry1A proteins (e.g., Agrotis ipsilon, S. exigua, and S. frugiperda) (MacIntosh et al., 1990; Estruch et al., 1996). In contrast, Vip3Ba1 caused significant growth delays but no larvicidal effect against Ostrinia nubilalis and Plutella xylostella (Rang et al., 2005). Preliminary bioassays of Vip3C also showed low activity, causing less than 30% mortality in S. exigua and S. frugiperda after 10 days at 4 µg/cm2 (Palma et al., 2012). Therefore, the observed lack of mortality in the seven B. thuringiensis strains indicated that the detected vip3 genes did not belong to the vip3A gene family.
Besides the potent insecticidal activity of its Vip3Aa94 protein, molecular analysis revealed that strain JC20 harbors the cry1D and cry2A genes, further increasing its value for lepidopteran pest control. Due to their broad-spectrum activity against various insect pests, particularly lepidopteran species, Cry1D and Cry2A are considered valuable components in insect resistance management strategies (Bravo et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2007; Hernández-Martínez, Ferré & Escriche, 2008; Sasaki et al., 1997; Alcantara et al., 2004). Cry1D is especially notable for its efficacy against Spodoptera species, including insects that have developed resistance to Cry1A toxins, and is among the few δ-endotoxins active against the highly damaging and Cry-tolerant S. littoralis (Hernández-Martínez, Ferré & Escriche, 2008; Bergamasco et al., 2013). Cry2A proteins are also recognized for their wide spectrum of toxicity against insects in the orders Lepidoptera and Diptera and for possessing modes of action distinct from other Cry proteins (Walters & English, 1995; Bravo et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2007; Van Frankenhuyzen, 2009). Accordingly, JC20 harboring Cry and Vip3 proteins can enhance toxicity against lepidopteran larvae due to their distinct structures, stabilities, and modes of action. While Vip proteins are secreted during the vegetative growth phase and are relatively unstable, cry genes accumulate as crystalline inclusion bodies that exhibit superior structural and environmental stability (Federici, Park & Sakano, 2006; Syed et al., 2020; Tetreau et al., 2021).
Previous studies have shown that Vip3 proteins are synthesized and secreted by Bt as full-length proteins with molecular weights of approximately 88–90 kDa (Estruch et al., 1996; Lee et al., 2003; Palma et al., 2014). Consistent with this study, the Vip3Aa94 protein from JC20 was successfully expressed in E. coli and exhibited an apparent molecular weight close to that expected for Vip3 proteins, confirming its correct expression and structural integrity.
Phylogenetic analyses have previously revealed substantial diversity within the vip3 gene family, reflecting the evolutionary complexity of insecticidal protein genes in Bt. In this study, vip3 gene sequences clustered into three well-supported phylogenetic groups, consistent with earlier reports describing diversification driven by biogeographic distribution and ecological specialization (De Maagd, Bravo & Crickmore, 2001; Raymond et al., 2010; Gupta, Kumar & Kaur, 2021). Notably, JC20 carrying the vip3Aa94 gene was positioned within Cluster C, which comprised genetically distinct sublineages including isolates from geographically distant regions. This pattern suggests that the vip3Aa94 gene may have arisen through evolutionary processes such as geographic isolation, local adaptation to specific insect hosts, or historical horizontal gene transfer events.
The distinct phylogenetic placement of JC20 within Cluster C highlights its potential as a novel source of Vip3 toxins with unique genetic features. Such genetic divergence may contribute to differences in insecticidal specificity or potency, however further functional studies will be required to determine whether sequence variation in Vip3Aa94 protein translates into novel bioactivity or enhances efficacy in pest management.
Although Vip3A proteins exhibit strong activity against lepidopteran pests, their commercial application is often limited by high production costs and protein instability, restricting their current use primarily to transgenic plants (Syed et al., 2020). In Thailand, where the cultivation of transgenic crops is strictly regulated, Bt strains like JC20 provide an effective alternative for pest control by combining powerful Vip3A proteins with stable Cry toxins. However, the practical application of these proteins remains challenging due to the limited environmental persistence of Vip3A compared to Cry toxins. In this context, future work focusing on encapsulation technologies to enhance the environmental stability and field efficacy of Vip3 proteins represents a promising alternative. In addition, exploring potential synergistic interactions between Vip3Aa94 and Cry1D or Cry2A toxins present in JC20 may further improve insect control efficacy and contribute to the development of effective Bt- based pest management strategies.
Conclusions
Among the 163 Thai strains of B. thuringiensis, 17 were found to contained the vip3 gene. Off these, JC20 produced Vip3 protein that was most effective against S. litura, S. exigua, and S. frugiperda. Characterization of JC20 revealed that it produces Vip3Aa94, encoded by a newly identified vip3 gene, in addition to crystal protein genes cry1D and cry2A. The combined insecticidal activity of these Cry crystals and Vip3 proteins makes JC20 a promising candidate for developing new biopesticides.
Supplemental Information
OMV files can be opened using jamovi (https://www.jamovi.org).
OMV files can be opened using jamovi ( https://www.jamovi.org).
OMV files can be opened using jamovi ( https://www.jamovi.org).
Acknowledgments
We thank Assistant Professor Akekawat Vitheepradit for providing the IBM SPSS program. Our submission manuscript was at least partially edited for grammar in order to improve clarity by using Gemini (Google). After using the tool, the authors reviewed the manuscript to ensure the content was accurate before sending to Editage for proofreading.
List of Abbreviations
- ANOVA
Analysis of variance
- BI
Bayesian inference
- Bt
Bacillus thuringiensis
- CI
Confidence interval
- Cry
Crystal protein
- DNA
Deoxyribonucleic acid
- IPTG
Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside
- IACUC
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
- kDa
Kilodalton
- LC50
Lethal concentration causing 50% mortality
- LC90
Lethal concentration causing 90% mortality
- ML
Maximum likelihood
- NCBI
National Center for Biotechnology Information
- NRCT
National Research Council of Thailand
- OD600
Optical density at 600 nm
- PCR
Polymerase chain reaction
- SDS–PAGE
Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
- SE
Standard error
- SEM
Scanning electron microscopy
- Vip
Vegetative insecticidal protein
Funding Statement
This research was supported by the Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (FF (KU) 52.69). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare there are no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Ratchadawan Ngoen-Klan conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Naruemon Chinon performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Atsalek Rattanawannee conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Atirach Noosidum conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, resources, and approved the final draft.
Wanwisa Siriwan conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Jariya Chanpaiseang conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, resources, and approved the final draft.
Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, funding acquisition, Conceptualization, and approved the final draft.
Prakai Rajchanuwong conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Ethics
The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):
The Thai Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) (license No. ACKU68-AGR-005).
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw data is available in the Supplemental Files.
The sequence is available at NCBI: PV339976.
References
- Abbott (1925).Abbott WS. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology. 1925;18:265–267. doi: 10.1093/jee/18.2.265a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Akaike (1974).Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1974;19:716–723. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Alcantara et al. (2004).Alcantara EP, Aguda RM, Curtiss A, Dean DH, Cohen MB. Bacillus thuringiensisδ-endotoxin binding to brush border membrane vesicles of rice stem borers. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology. 2004;55(4):169–177. doi: 10.1002/arch.10128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Attathom et al. (1995).Attathom T, Chongrattanameteekul W, Chanpaisang J, Siriyan R. Morphological diversity and toxicity of delta-endotoxin produced by various strains of Bacillus thuringiensis. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 1995;85(2):167–173. doi: 10.1017/S0007485300034234. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Baragamaarachchi et al. (2019).Baragamaarachchi RY, Samarasekera JK, Weerasena OV, Lamour K, Jurat-Fuentes JL. Identification of a native Bacillus thuringiensis strain from Sri Lanka active against Dipel-resistant Plutella xylostella. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7535. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baranek et al. (2015).Baranek J, Kaznowski A, Konecka E, Naimov S. Activity of vegetative insecticidal proteins Vip3Aa58 and Vip3Aa59 of Bacillus thuringiensis against lepidopteran pests. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2015;130:72–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2015.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beard et al. (2008).Beard CE, Court L, Boets A, Mourant R, Van Rie J, Akhurst RJ. Unusually high frequency of genes encoding vegetative insecticidal proteins in an Australian Bacillus thuringiensis collection. Current Microbiology. 2008;57:195–199. doi: 10.1007/s00284-008-9173-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bergamasco et al. (2013).Bergamasco VB, Mendes DR, Fernandes OA, Desidério JA, Lemos MV. Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ia10 and Vip3Aa protein interactions and their toxicity in Spodoptera spp. (Lepidoptera) Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2013;112(2):152–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2012.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boonmee, Thammasittirong & Thammasittirong (2019).Boonmee K, Thammasittirong SN, Thammasittirong A. Molecular characterization of lepidopteran-specific toxin genes in Bacillus thuringiensis strains from Thailand. 3 Biotech. 2019;9(4):117. doi: 10.1007/s13205-019-1646-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bradford (1976).Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry. 1976;72(1–2):248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bravo et al. (2004).Bravo A, Gómez I, Conde J, Munoz-Garay C, Sánchez J, Miranda R, Zhuang M, Gill SS, Soberón M. Oligomerization triggers binding of a Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab pore-forming toxin to aminopeptidase N-receptor leading to insertion into membrane microdomains. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Biomembranes. 2004;1667(1):38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bravo et al. (1998).Bravo A, Sarabia S, Lopez L, Ontiveros H, Abarca C, Ortiz A, Ortiz M, Lina L, Villalobos FJ, Peña G, Nuñez-Valdez ME, Soberón M, Quintero R. Characterization of cry genes in a Mexican Bacillus thuringiensis strain collection. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1998;64(12):4965–4972. doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.12.4965-4972.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chakroun et al. (2012).Chakroun M, Bel Y, Caccia S, Abdelkefi-Mesrati L, Escriche B, Ferré J. Susceptibility of Spodoptera frugiperda and S. exigua to Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3Aa insecticidal protein. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2012;110(3):334–339. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2012.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Che et al. (2013).Che W, Shi T, Wu Y, Yang Y. Insecticide resistance status of field populations of Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from China. Journal of Economic Entomology. 2013;106(4):1855–1862. doi: 10.1603/EC13128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng et al. (2017).Cheng T, Wu J, Wu Y, Chilukuri RV, Huang L, Yamamoto K, Feng L, Li W, Chen Z, Guo H, Liu J, Li S, Wang X, Peng L, Liu D, Guo Y, Fu B, Li Z, Liu C, Chen Y, Tomar A, Hilliou F, Montagné N, Jacquin-Joly E, d’Alenc˛on E, Seth RK, Bhatnagar RK, Jouraku A, Shiotsuki T, Kadono-Okuda K, Promboon A, Smagghe G, Arunkumar KP, Kishino H, Goldsmith MR, Feng Q, Xia Q, Mita K. Genomic adaptation to polyphagy and insecticides in a major East Asian noctuid pest. Nature Ecology and Evolution. 2017;11:1747–1756. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0314-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crickmore et al. (2021).Crickmore N, Berry C, Panneerselvam S, Mishra R, Connor TR, Bonning BC. A structure-based nomenclature for Bacillus thuringiensis and other bacteria-derived pesticidal proteins. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2021;186:107438. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2020.107438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crickmore et al. (2025).Crickmore N, Berry C, Panneerselvam S, Mishra R, Connor TR, Bonning BC. Bacterial Pesticidal Protein Resource Center. 2025. https://www.bpprc.org. [25 April 2025]. https://www.bpprc.org
- De Escudero et al. (2014).De Escudero IR, Banyuls N, Bel Y, Maeztu M, Escriche B, Muñoz D, Caballero P, Ferré J. A screening of five Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3A proteins for their activity against lepidopteran pests. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2014;117:51–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2014.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Maagd, Bravo & Crickmore (2001).De Maagd RA, Bravo A, Crickmore N. How Bacillus thuringiensis has evolved specific toxins to colonize the insect world. Trends in Genetics. 2001;17:193–199. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02237-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dulmage et al. (1990).Dulmage HT, Yousten AA, Singer SL, Lacey LA. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerlandhttps://iris.who.int/handle/10665/61645 Guidelines for production of Bacillus thuringiensis H-14 and Bacillus sphaericus. 1990
- Ehling-Schulz, Lereclus & Koehler (2019).Ehling-Schulz M, Lereclus D, Koehler TM. The Bacillus cereus group: Bacillus species with pathogenic potential. Microbiology Spectrum. 2019;3:10–1128. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0032-2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ejiofor & Johnson (2002).Ejiofor AO, Johnson T. Physiological and molecular detection of crystalliferous Bacillus thuringiensis strains from habitats in the South Central United States. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2002;28(5):284–290. doi: 10.1038/sj/jim/7000244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Espinasse et al. (2003).Espinasse S, Chaufaux J, Buisson C, Perchat S, Gohar M, Bourguet D, Sanchis V. Occurrence and linkage between secreted insecticidal toxins in natural isolates of Bacillus thuringiensis. Current Microbiology. 2003;47:501–507. doi: 10.1007/s00284-003-4097-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Estruch et al. (1996).Estruch JJ, Warren GW, Mullins MA, Nye GJ, Craig JA, Koziel MG. Vip3A, a novel Bacillus thuringiensis vegetative insecticidal protein with a wide spectrum of activities against lepidopteran insects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1996;93(11):5389–5394. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.11.5389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Federici, Park & Sakano (2006).Federici BA, Park HW, Sakano Y. Insecticidal protein crystals of Bacillusthuringiensis. In: Shively JM, editor. Inclusions in prokaryotes. Springer; Berlin: 2006. pp. 195–236. [Google Scholar]
- Ferré et al. (2023).Ferré J, Bel Y, Lázaro-Berenguer M, Hernández-Martínez P. Vip3 insecticidal proteins: structure and mode of action. In: Jurat-Fuentes JL, editor. Advances in insect physiology. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2023. pp. 93–122. [Google Scholar]
- Finney (1971).Finney DJ. A statistical treatment of the sigmoid response curve. Probit analysis. Cambridge University Press; London, UK: 1971. [Google Scholar]
- Fiuza et al. (2017).Fiuza LM, Berlitz DL, De Oliveira JV, Knaak N. Bacillus thuringiensis and Lysinibacillus sphaericus: characterization and use in the field of biocontrol. Springer International Publishing; Netherlands: 2017. Bacillus thuringiensis: different targets and interactions. [Google Scholar]
- George & Crickmore (2012).George Z, Crickmore N. Bacillus thuringiensis applications in agriculture. In: Sansinenea E, editor. Bacillus thuringiensis biotechnology. Springer; Netherlands: 2012. pp. 19–39. [Google Scholar]
- Goergen et al. (2016).Goergen G, Kumar PL, Sankung SB, Togola A, Tamò M. First report of outbreaks of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), a new alien invasive pest in West and Central Africa. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0165632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- González Jr, Brown & Carlton (1982).González Jr JM, Brown BJ, Carlton BC. Transfer of Bacillus thuringiensis plasmids coding for delta-endotoxin among strains of B. thuringiensis and B. cereus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1982;79(22):6951–6955. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.22.6951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gouffon et al. (2011).Gouffon CV, Van Vliet A, Van Rie J, Jansens S, Jurat-Fuentes JL. Binding sites for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2Ae toxin on heliothine brush border membrane vesicles are not shared with Cry1A, Cry1F, or Vip3A toxin. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2011;77(10):3182–3188. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02791-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gujar et al. (2007).Gujar GT, Kalia V, Kumari A, Singh BP, Mittal A, Nair R, Mohan M. Helicoverpa armigera baseline susceptibility to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxins and resistance management for Bt cotton in India. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2007;95(3):214–219. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2007.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Güney et al. (2019).Güney E, Adıgüzel A, Demirbağ Z, Sezen K. Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki strains produce vegetative insecticidal proteins (Vip 3) with high potential. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control. 2019;29:1–6. doi: 10.1186/s41938-019-0180-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, Kumar & Kaur (2021).Gupta M, Kumar H, Kaur S. Vegetative insecticidal protein (Vip): a potential contender from Bacillus thuringiensis for efficient management of various detrimental agricultural pests. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;12:659736. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.659736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hellmich et al. (2001).Hellmich RL, Siegfried BD, Sears MK, Stanley-Horn DE, Daniels MJ, Mattila HR, Spencer T, Bidne KG, Lewis LC. Monarch larvae sensitivity to Bacillus thuringiensis-purified proteins and pollen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;98(21):11925–11930. doi: 10.1073/pnas.211297698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hemthanon, Promdonkoy & Boonserm (2023).Hemthanon T, Promdonkoy B, Boonserm P. Screening and characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates for high production of Vip3A and Cry proteins and high thermostability to control Spodoptera spp. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2023;201:108020. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2023.108020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hernández-Martínez, Ferré & Escriche (2008).Hernández-Martínez P, Ferré J, Escriche B. Susceptibility of Spodoptera exigua to 9 toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2008;97(3):245–250. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2007.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hernández-Rodríguez et al. (2009).Hernández-Rodríguez CS, Boets A, Van Rie J, Ferré J. Screening and identification of vip genes in Bacillus thuringiensis strains. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2009;107(1):219–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04199.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hilliou et al. (2021).Hilliou F, Chertemps T, Maïbèche M, Le Goff G. Resistance in the genus Spodoptera: key insect detoxification genes. Insects. 2021;12(6):544. doi: 10.3390/insects12060544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hinnekens et al. (2022).Hinnekens P, Fayad N, Gillis A, Mahillon J. Conjugation across Bacillus cereus and kin: a review. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2022;13:1034440. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1034440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoang et al. (2018).Hoang DT, Chernomor O, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2018;35:518–522. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huelsenbeck & Hillis (1993).Huelsenbeck JP, Hillis DM. Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case. Systematic Biology. 1993;42:247–264. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/42.3.247. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huelsenbeck & Ronquist (2001).Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 2001;17:754–755. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Idrees et al. (2023).Idrees A, Afzal A, Chohan TA, Hayat S, Qadir ZA, Gaafar AR, Zuan AT, Li J. Laboratory evaluation of selected botanicals and insecticides against invasive Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Journal of King Saud University—Science. 2023;35(7):102811. doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2023.102811. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Idrees et al. (2022).Idrees A, Qadir ZA, Afzal A, Ranran Q, Li J. Laboratory efficacy of selected synthetic insecticides against second instar invasive fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(5):e0265265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- IPPC (2018).IPPC First detection of fall army worm on the border of Thailand. 2018. https://www.ippc.int/en/countries/thailand/pestreports/2018/12/first-detection-of-fall-army-worm-on-the-border-of-thailand/ [20 February 2025]. https://www.ippc.int/en/countries/thailand/pestreports/2018/12/first-detection-of-fall-army-worm-on-the-border-of-thailand/
- Janmaat, Bergmann & Ericsson (2014).Janmaat AF, Bergmann L, Ericsson J. Effect of low levels of Bacillus thuringiensis exposure on the growth, food consumption and digestion efficiencies of Trichoplusia ni resistant and susceptible to Bt. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2014;119:32–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2014.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Juarez-Perez, Ferrandis & Frutos (1997).Juarez-Perez VM, Ferrandis M, Frutos R. PCR-based approach for detection of novel Bacillus thuringiensis cry genes. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 1997;(8):2997–3002. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.8.2997-3002.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laemmli (1970).Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larget & Simon (1999).Larget B, Simon DL. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 1999;16:750–759. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026160. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lecadet et al. (1999).Lecadet MM, Frachon E, Dumanoir VC, Ripouteau H, Hamon S, Laurent P, Thiery I. Updating the H-antigen classification of Bacillus thuringiensis. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 1999;86(4):660–672. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00710.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee, Miles & Chen (2006).Lee MK, Miles P, Chen JS. Brush border membrane binding properties of Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3A toxin to Heliothis virescens and Helicoverpa zea midguts. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2006;339(4):1043–1047. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.11.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee et al. (2003).Lee MK, Walters FS, Hart H, Palekar N, Chen JS. The mode of action of the Bacillus thuringiensis vegetative insecticidal protein Vip3A differs from that of Cry1Ab δ-endotoxin. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2003;69(8):4648–4657. doi: 10.1128/aem.69.8.4648-4657.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lertwiriyawonga et al. (2010).Lertwiriyawonga B, Pinthonga K, Chanpaisaengb J, Saksoonga P, Huehnea PS. Analysis of the insecticidal crystal gene type 1 of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates affecting lepidopterans. ScienceAsia. 2010;36(4):271–279. doi: 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2010.36.271. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu et al. (2011).Liu JG, Yang AZ, Shen XH, Hua BG, Shi GL. Specific binding of activated Vip3Aa10 to Helicoverpa armigera brush border membrane vesicles results in pore formation. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2011;108(2):92–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2011.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Logan & Berkeley (1984).Logan NA, Berkeley RCW. Identification of Bacillus strains using the API system. Microbiology. 1984;130(7):1871–1882. doi: 10.1099/00221287-130-7-1871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loguercio et al. (2002).Loguercio LL, Barreto ML, Rocha TL, Santos CG, Teixeira FF, Paiva E. Combined analysis of supernatant-based feeding bioassays and PCR as a first-tier screening strategy for Vip-derived activities in Bacillus thuringiensis strains effective against tropical fall armyworm. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2002;93(2):269–277. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01694.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lone et al. (2016).Lone SA, Yadav R, Malik A, Padaria JC. Molecular and insecticidal characterization of Vip3A protein producing Bacillus thuringiensis strains toxic against Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 2016;62(2):179–190. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2015-0328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacIntosh et al. (1990).MacIntosh SC, Stone TB, Sims SR, Hunst PL, Greenplate JT, Marrone PG, Perlak FJ, Fischhoff DA, Fuchs RL. Specificity and efficacy of purified Bacillusthuringiensis proteins against agronomically important insects. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 1990;56(2):258–266. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(90)90109-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Masson et al. (1998).Masson L, Erlandson M, Puzstai-Carey M, Brousseau R, Juárez-Pérez V, Frutos R. A holistic approach for determining the entomopathogenic potential of Bacillus thuringiensis strains. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1998;64(12):4782–4788. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.12.4782-4788.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mesrati, Tounsi & Jaoua (2005).Mesrati LA, Tounsi S, Jaoua S. Characterization of a novel vip 3-type gene from Bacillus thuringiensis and evidence of its presence on a large plasmid. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2005;244(2):353–358. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Milne et al. (2008).Milne R, Liu Y, Gauthier D, Van Frankenhuyzen K. Purification of Vip3Aa from Bacillus thuringiensis HD-1 and its contribution to toxicity of HD-1 to spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana) and gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) (Lepidoptera) Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2008;99(2):166–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2008.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Minh et al. (2020).Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, Von Haeseler A, Lanfear R. IQ-TREE 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2020;37:1530–1534. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nutaratat et al. (2023).Nutaratat P, Werapan B, Phosrithong N, Trakulnaleamsai C, Rungrod A, Utamatho M, Soonsanga S, Promdonkoy B, Malairuang K, Prathumpai W. Vegetative insecticidal protein (Vip3A) production by Bacillus thuringiensis Bt294 and its efficacy against Lepidopteran pests (Spodoptera exigua) Biotechnology Reports. 2023;40:e00812. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2023.e00812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palma et al. (2013).Palma L, De Escudero IR, Maeztu M, Caballero P, Muñoz D. Screening of vip genes from a Spanish Bacillus thuringiensis collection and characterization of two Vip3 proteins highly toxic to five lepidopteran crop pests. BioControl. 2013;66(3):141–149. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Palma et al. (2012).Palma L, Hernández Rodríguez CS, Maeztu M, Hernández Martínez P, Ruiz de Escudero Fuentemilla I, Escriche B, Muñoz D, Van Rie J, Ferré J, Caballero P. Vip3C, a novel class of vegetative insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2012;78:7163–7165. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01360-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palma et al. (2014).Palma L, Muñoz D, Berry C, Murillo J, Caballero P. Bacillus thuringiensis toxins: an overview of their biocidal activity. Toxins. 2014;6(12):3296–3325. doi: 10.3390/toxins6123296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patel, Purani & Ingle (2013).Patel KD, Purani S, Ingle SS. Distribution and diversity analysis of Bacillus thuringiensis cry genes in different soil types and geographical regions of India. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2013;112(2):116–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2012.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Porcar et al. (2014).Porcar M, Déleclusse A, Ibarra JE, Juárez-Pérez V. Early transcription of Bacillus thuringiensis cry genes in strains active on Lepidopteran species and the role of gene content on their expression. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2014;105:1007–1015. doi: 10.1007/s10482-014-0160-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Porcar & Juárez-Pérez (2003).Porcar M, Juárez-Pérez V. PCR-based identification of Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal crystal genes. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2003;26(5):419–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2003.tb00624.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rabha, Acharjee & Sarmah (2018).Rabha M, Acharjee S, Sarmah BK. Multilocus sequence typing for phylogenetic view and vip gene diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis strains of the Assam soil of North East India. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2018;34(7):103. doi: 10.1007/s11274-018-2489-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rajchanuwong, Chanpaisaeng & Kaewsompong (2019).Rajchanuwong P, Chanpaisaeng J, Kaewsompong S. Characterization and toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis serovar chanpaisis (H46): a serovar from Thailand. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology. 2019;41(4):804–812. doi: 10.14456/sjst-psu.2019.103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rajchanuwong et al. (2025).Rajchanuwong P, Peaboon S, Ngoen-Klan R, Rattanawannee A, Noosidum A, Promdonkoy B, Chanpaisaeng J, Chareonviriyaphap T. Larvicidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis strains against Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. Current Research in Parasitology and Vector-Borne Diseases. 2025;7:100245. doi: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2025.100245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rang et al. (2005).Rang C, Gil P, Neisner N, Van Rie J, Frutos R. Novel Vip3-related protein from Bacillus thuringiensis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2005;71(10):6276–6281. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.10.6276-6281.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rangeshwaran et al. (2016).Rangeshwaran R, Velavan V, Lewis FM, Kumari S, Shylesha AN, Mohan M, Kumar S, Sivakumar G. Cloning, expression and bioassay of Vip3A protein from an indigenous Bacillus thuringiensis isolate. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology. 2016;10:1533–1539. doi: 10.22207/JPAM.10.2.82. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Raymond et al. (2010).Raymond B, Johnston PR, Nielsen-LeRoux C, Lereclus D, Crickmore N. Bacillus thuringiensis: an impotent pathogen? Trends in Microbiology. 2010;18:189–194. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2010.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ronquist et al. (2012).Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology. 2012;61:539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Şahin et al. (2018).Şahin B, Gomis-Cebolla J, Güneş H, Ferre J. Characterization of Bacillusthuringiensis isolates by their insecticidal activity and their production of Cry and Vip3 proteins. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(11) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206813. e0206813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanané et al. (2021).Sanané I, Legrand J, Dillmann C, Marion-Poll F. High-throughput feeding bioassay for lepidoptera larvae. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2021;47:642–652. doi: 10.1007/s10886-021-01290-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sasaki et al. (1997).Sasaki J, Asano S, Hashimoto N, Lay BW, Hastowo S, Bando H, Iizuka T. Characterization of a cry 2A gene cloned from an isolate of Bacillus thuringiensis serovar sotto. Current Microbiology. 1997;35:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s002849900201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sattar et al. (2008).Sattar S, Biswas PK, Hossain MA, Maiti MK, Sen SK, Basu A. Search for vegetative insecticidal proteins (VIPs) from local isolates of Bacillus thuringiensis effective against lepidopteran and homopteran insect pests. Journal of Biopesticides. 2008;1(2):216–222. doi: 10.57182/jbiopestic.1.2.216-222. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sauka & Benintende (2017).Sauka DH, Benintende GB. Diversity and distribution of lepidopteran-specific toxin genes in Bacillus thuringiensis strains from Argentina. Revista Argentina de Microbiologia. 2017;49(3):273–281. doi: 10.1016/j.ram.2017.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwarz (1978).Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics. 1978;61(2):461–464. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2958889. [Google Scholar]
- Seifinejad et al. (2008).Seifinejad A, Jouzani GS, Hosseinzadeh A, Abdmishani C. Characterization of Lepidoptera-active cry and vip genes in Iranian Bacillus thuringiensis strain collection. Biocontrol. 2008;44(2):216–226. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.09.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sellami et al. (2013).Sellami S, Zghal T, Cherif M, Zalila-Kolsi I, Jaoua S, Jamoussi K. Screening and identification of a Bacillus thuringiensis strain S1/4 with large and efficient insecticidal activities. Journal of Basic Microbiology. 2013;53(6):539–548. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201100653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Selvapandiyan et al. (2001).Selvapandiyan A, Arora N, Rajagopal R, Jalali SK, Venkatesan T, Singh SP, Bhatnagar RK. Toxicity analysis of N-and C-terminus-deleted vegetative insecticidal protein from Bacillus thuringiensis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2001;67(12):5855–5858. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.12.5855-5858.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song et al. (2016).Song F, Lin Y, Chen C, Shao E, Guan X, Huang Z. Insecticidal activity and histopathological effects of Vip3Aa protein from Bacillus thuringiensis on Spodoptera litura. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2016;26(10):1774–1780. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1604.04090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Syed et al. (2020).Syed T, Askari M, Meng Z, Li Y, Abid MA, Wei Y, Guo S, Liang C, Zhang R. Current insights on vegetative insecticidal proteins (Vip) as next generation pest killers. Toxins. 2020;12(8):522. doi: 10.3390/toxins12080522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanabe (2007).Tanabe AS. Kakusan: a computer program to automate the selection of a nucleotide substitution model and the configuration of a mixed model on multilocus data. Molecular Ecology Notes. 2007;7:962–964. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01807.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tetreau et al. (2021).Tetreau G, Andreeva EA, Banneville AS, De Zitter E, Colletier JP. How does Bacillus thuringiensis crystallize such a large diversity of toxins? Toxins. 2021;13(7):443. doi: 10.3390/toxins13070443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thammasittirong & Attathom (2008).Thammasittirong A, Attathom T. PCR-based method for the detection of cry genes in local isolates of Bacillus thuringiensis from Thailand. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2008;98(2):121–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2008.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thaphan, Keawsompong & Chanpaisaeng (2008).Thaphan P, Keawsompong S, Chanpaisaeng J. Isolation, toxicity and detection of cry gene in Bacillus thuringiensis isolates in Krabi province, Thailand. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology. 2008;30(5):597–601. https://sjst.psu.ac.th/article/903/PaperPDFw-Links/download. [Google Scholar]
- Thirawut et al. (2023).Thirawut S, Sutjaritthammajariyangkun W, Rukkasikorn A, Punyawattoe P, Noonart U, Kobori Y. Pesticide susceptibility monitoring of fall armyworms (Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith)): a simple methodology for information-sharing among Southeast Asian countries. CABI Agriculture and Bioscience. 2021;4(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s43170-023-00160-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas et al. (2000).Thomas DJI, Morgan JAW, Whipps JM, Saunders JR. Plasmid transfer between the Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies kurstaki and tenebrionis in laboratory culture and soil and in lepidopteran and coleopteran larvae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2000;66(1):118–124. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.1.118-124.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uribe, Martinez & Ceron (2003).Uribe D, Martinez W, Ceron J. Distribution and diversity of cry genes in native strains of Bacillus thuringiensis obtained from different ecosystems from Colombia. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2003;82(2):119–127. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2011(02)00195-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valadez-Lira et al. (2012).Valadez-Lira JA, Alcocer-Gonzalez JM, Damas G, Nunez-Mejia G, Oppert B, Rodriguez-Padill C, Tamez-Guerra P. Comparative evaluation of phenoloxidase activity in different larval stages of four lepidopteran pests after exposure to Bacillus thuringiensis. Journal of Insect Science. 2012;12(1):80. doi: 10.1673/031.012.8001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Frankenhuyzen (2009).Van Frankenhuyzen K. Insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2009;101(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2009.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vilas-Boas et al. (2002).Vilas-Boas G, Sanchis V, Lereclus D, Lemos MVF, Bourguet D. Genetic differentiation between sympatric populations of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2002;68(3):1414–1424. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.3.1414-1424.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walters & English (1995).Walters FS, English LH. Toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensisδ-endotoxins toward the potato aphid in an artificial diet bioassay. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata. 1995;77(2):211–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1995.tb02003.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yu et al. (1997).Yu CG, Mullins MA, Warren GW, Koziel MG, Estruch JJ. The Bacillus thuringiensis vegetative insecticidal protein Vip3A lyses midgut epithelium cells of susceptible insects. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1997;63(2):532–536. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.2.532-536.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu et al. (2011).Yu X, Zheng A, Zhu J, Wang S, Wang L, Deng Q, Li S, Liu H, Li P. Characterization of vegetative insecticidal protein vip genes of Bacillus thuringiensis from Sichuan Basin in China. Current Microbiology. 2011;62:752–757. doi: 10.1007/s00284-010-9782-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang et al. (2007).Zhang X, Zhang L, Ye G, Wang Y, Chen Y, Chen D. The impact of introducing the Bacillus thuringiensis gene into cotton on boll nitrogen metabolism. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2007;61(2):175–180. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
OMV files can be opened using jamovi (https://www.jamovi.org).
OMV files can be opened using jamovi ( https://www.jamovi.org).
OMV files can be opened using jamovi ( https://www.jamovi.org).
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw data is available in the Supplemental Files.
The sequence is available at NCBI: PV339976.





