Skip to main content
National Science Review logoLink to National Science Review
. 2025 Nov 13;13(10):nwaf497. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaf497

Integrative multi-omics analysis reveals the domestication mechanism of black rice

Zaihui Zhou 1,2,3,b, Zenan Yang 4,5,6,b, Qinglu Zhang 7,8,9,b, Xushi Wang 10,11,12, Qiu Chen 13,14,15, Xinyao Yu 16,17,18, Yao Zhou 19, Yidan Ouyang 20, Jianwei Zhang 21, Weibo Xie 22, Qifa Zhang 23, Hao Chen 24,25,26,✉
PMCID: PMC13247721  PMID: 42273350

ABSTRACT

Black rice, a nutritionally superior yet genetically uncharacterized germplasm, exhibits extreme rarity (∼ 1%) in natural rice populations. Here, we establish a global germplasm collection of 367 black rice accessions and employ integrated multi-omics (genomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics) to dissect its divergence from white rice. Population genomic analyses reveal a two-step domestication trajectory for black rice from the wild progenitor: initial Rc-mediated loss of proanthocyanidin pigmentation, followed by OsKala4/OsMYB3-driven anthocyanin activation under artificial selection. Genome-wide scans identify 238 differentially selected regions between black and white rice that orchestrate extensive transcriptomic reprogramming (up to 22% differentially expressed genes) and metabolomic remodeling (up to 32% differentially accumulated metabolites) in black rice seeds. Multi-omics analysis and a genome-wide association study uncover previously uncharacterized regulators (OsWRKY1, OsBBX13, OsTT12) that synergistically enhance the MYB-bHLH-WD40 (MBW) transcriptional complex to regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis and vacuolar sequestration. Furthermore, we reconstructed a comprehensive biosynthetic pathway network for phenolic acids and flavonoids in black rice through integration of experimental metabolomic and transcriptomic datasets with Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway annotations. Finally, we evaluated the selection status of 225 quantitative trait genes and compared agronomic traits between black and white rice. Our findings provide a molecular roadmap for precision breeding strategies to develop elite black rice cultivars with optimized nutritional and agronomic performance.

Keywords: Oryza sativa, black rice, crop domestication, anthocyanin biosynthesis, GWAS

INTRODUCTION

As a staple food for over half the world’s population, rice (Oryza sativa) contributes approximately 20% of global calorie intake, making it a critical crop for food security [1]. As a research model for monocot plants, rice possesses extensive germplasm resources characterized by remarkable phenotypic and genetic diversity. This diversity not only serves as an invaluable foundation for investigating crop evolutionary trajectories but also provides essential genetic material for breeding strategies aimed at enhancing agronomic and adaptive traits. The advance of next-generation sequencing has revolutionized multi-omics research, empowering correlative analysis of genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic datasets to decode the molecular foundation of complex traits [2]. Over the past two decades, multi-omics approaches including genomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics have been widely applied to dissect rice germplasm populations, uncovering genetic mechanisms underlying its domestication, environmental adaptation and key agronomic traits [3–12]. These discoveries have not only significantly deepened our understanding of rice evolutionary dynamics but also accelerate the development of precision breeding programs targeting yield improvement and environment resilience.

Rice germplasm exhibits natural variation in pericarp coloration, ranging from white to red and black/purple. Although most modern rice cultivars exhibit white pericarp, their wild progenitor Oryza rufipogon typically displays red pericarp. The white rice phenotype originates from loss-of-function mutations in the OsRc gene, which abolishes proanthocyanidin biosynthesis [13], while the formation of black pericarp arises from structural rearrangements within the promoter region of a bHLH transcription factor gene OsKala4, which activates OsKala4 transcription thereby driving anthocyanin biosynthesis in the pericarp tissue [14]. Analyses of major rice diversity panels—including the 3000 Rice Genomes Project population and a globally representative core collection of 533 accessions—reveal a striking imbalance in pigmentation prevalence; over 85% of accessions display white pericarp, approximately 10%–14% accumulate proanthocyanidins responsible for red pigmentation, and about 1% produce anthocyanins that confer black or purple hues [7,15].

The pigments in rice pericarp not only impart distinctive visual traits but also elevate nutritional quality by enhancing bioactive compound contents [16,17]. Comprehensive nutrient analyses reveal that whole-grain rice retains significantly higher levels of fiber, essential minerals, vitamins and bioactive compounds compared with milled rice, with black rice varieties demonstrating exceptional enrichment in certain phytochemicals including anthocyanins, proanthocyanidins, phenolic acids and carotenoids etc [18]. The nutritional superiority of whole-grain black rice is quantifiable through its Nutrient Density Unit (NDU = 1.1098) surpassing milled white rice (NDU = 0.4356) and whole-grain white rice (NDU = 0.9522) by 154.8% and 16.6%, respectively [18]. Substantial evidence from animal studies validates the health benefits of black rice consumption, including antioxidant capacity, anti-inflammatory effects, prevention of chronic non-communicable diseases (e.g. type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disorders and certain cancers) and lifespan extension [16]. Recognizing these advantages, the scientific community has begun to advocate for adopting whole-grain black rice as a primary dietary staple in rice-consuming communities [19]. Furthermore, a novel breeding initiative termed Green Nutritious Super Rice (GNSR) has been proposed to synergistically address food security, agricultural sustainability and public health. This strategy employs whole-grain black rice as a prototype for developing nutrient-dense cultivars [20].

Despite the widespread application of multi-omics approaches in rice germplasm research, the genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic profiles of black rice accessions remain largely uncharacterized. This knowledge gap stems from their scarcity in natural rice populations, which critically hinders the development of elite black rice cultivars and their commercial promotion. To address this limitation, in this study, we collected a worldwide population comprising 367 black rice accessions. Utilizing this black rice resource, we conducted a pioneering investigation into the evolutionary origin and domestication history of black rice varieties through genomic and phylogenetic analyses. Furthermore, systematic multi-omics profiling elucidated the genetic regulatory mechanism and metabolic pathways underlying anthocyanin biosynthesis—the hallmark biochemical distinction between black and white rice varieties.

RESULTS

Collection and sequencing of a black rice population

A total of 367 black rice accessions, including landraces and cultivars, were collected from China, Indonesia, Japan, Myanmar and the Philippines (Table S1). These accessions show substantial natural variation in anthocyanin content of seeds, ranging from 7.14 to 8434.83 µg/g dry weight (Fig. S1a and b). Genomes of all accessions were sequenced on with an average depth of ∼20× (ranging from 13.8× to 37.0×). To identify adaptive genomic patterns in black rice, we supplemented these data with publicly available genomes from 185 wild rice (O. rufipogon) accessions [21] and 202 high-coverage (>30×) white rice accessions from the 3000 Rice Genomes Project [5,7] (Table S2). We devised a high-throughput analytical pipeline integrating genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic datasets to systematically interrogate multi-omics data (Fig. S2).

Clean paired-end reads from all 754 rice genomes were individually mapped to the Nipponbare reference genome (IRGSP-1.0), identifying approximately 4.3 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree constructed using high-quality synonymous SNPs revealed clear divergence of subspecies from wild groups (Fig. 1a and Fig. S3a–S3c). The analysis delineated two distinct groups corresponding to geng (japonica) and xian (indica) black rice, comprising 91 and 276 accessions, respectively (Fig. S3a). The geng black rice formed two subgroups (temperate and tropical Geng), while the xian black rice comprised three subgroups (xian I, xian II and xian III) plus a xian admixture. Xian black rice clustered in branches distinct from xian white rice (Fig. 1a). Although some admixing occurred between Geng black and white rice, their primary branches predominantly contained single rice types (Fig. 1a). Principal component analysis (PCA) clearly separated the black rice population into xian and geng groups (Fig. S1c). Population structure analysis using the ADMIXTURE program with increasing K-values (2–6) further validated these genetic divisions (Fig. S1d).

Figure 1.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Screening and identification of selective sweep loci in black rice. (a) Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of all 754 rice accessions. (b) Genome-wide XP-CLR analysis between black rice/O. rufipogon (top) and white rice/O. rufipogon (bottom) using 100-kb sliding windows with 10-kb steps. (c and d) Haplotype network of OsKala4 (c) and OsMYB3 (d). Circle sizes in (c) and (d) represent haplotype frequencies with those below 0.5% excluded. (e) Anthocyanin content variation among OsMYB3 haplotypes. P values were determined by the two-tailed Student’s t-test. (f and g) Nucleotide diversity (π) distribution within 4-Mb genomic regions surrounding OsKala4 (f) and OsMYB3 (g). Gene loci are indicated by black dashed lines. (h) Selective sweep detection between black and white rice using XP-CLR (100-kb sliding windows with 10-kb steps).

Domestication loci of black rice

To investigate the domestication process of black rice, we analyzed selective signatures between black rice and O. rufipogon (B–O) using the cross-population composite likelihood ratio (XP-CLR) method (Fig. 1b, Table S3). For comparison, we similarly calculated XP-CLR scores between white rice and O. rufipogon (W–O) (Fig. 1b, Table S4). We defined selective sweeps as genomic regions within the top 1% of XP-CLR scores, identifying 103 domestication/selective sweep loci containing 2180 non-transposable element (non-TE)-associated genes across all black rice accessions (Fig. 1b and Table S3). Approximately 50.1% of these domestication/selective sweep loci overlapped with those detected in white rice. Subgroup analyses identified 165 loci (3149 non-TE genes) in geng black rice and 178 loci (3016 non-TE genes) in xian black rice (Fig. S4). Key domestication genes within these loci included OsPROG1 (plant architecture) [22–24], OsRc (pericarp color) [13], OsBh4 (Blackhull 4, hull colors) [25], OsLABA1 (awn length and loss of barbs) [26] and Ossh4 (seed shattering) [27–29]. These genes were shared between black and white rice domestication loci (Fig. 1b). Haplotype analyses further confirmed that identical superior haplotypes of these genes were maintained in both black and white rice populations (Fig. S5a–S5e), demonstrating their shared early domestication trajectories from a common wild ancestor.

However, we identified two genomic regions containing anthocyanin regulatory genes, OsKala4 [14] and OsMYB3 [30], which exhibited exclusive selection signals in black rice compared to white rice (Fig. 1b). Both OsKala4 and OsMYB3 showed signatures of strong positive selection, as evidenced by their elevated population differentiation (Fst) of B–O compared to W–O and reduced nucleotide diversity (π) value compared to O. rufipogon and white rice (Fig. S6a–S6d).

OsKala4, a key gene associated with black rice pigmentation, acquired its function through an 11-kb insertion upstream of its transcription start site, uniquely conserved in black rice [14, 31]. Our previous study localized this functional rearrangement to the −3 kb to −4 kb upstream region [31]. We performed haplotype analysis of the 11-kb promoter region across our black rice population. This revealed an exceptionally conserved sequence with only a single SNP, defining two haplotypes: the predominant H01 (98.9% of varieties); and a rare H02 (found in only four accessions) (Fig. S7). This pattern strongly indicates a single evolutionary origin for the functional OsKala4 allele. Although no coding sequence variations in OsKala4 were detected between black and white rice, haplotype analysis spanning its 5′-UTR to 3′-UTR demonstrated that 95.9% of black rice accessions clustered into haplotype H01 (Fig. 1c), establishing a robust association between this haplotype and the black rice phenotype.

OsMYB3 encodes another core anthocyanin regulatory gene in black rice [30]. Haplotype analysis identified a black rice-specific haplotype (H01) present in 79.3% of black rice accessions, but completely absent in white and wild rice (Fig. 1d). Notably, accessions carrying OsMYB3-H01 exhibited significantly higher average seed anthocyanin content compared to other haplotypes (Fig. 1e), indicating that H01 represents a functionally enhanced allele selected during black rice improvement to enhance pericarp pigmentation.

Tropical geng black rice exhibited significantly lower nucleotide diversity (π = 0.0013) in the OsKala4 locus compared to temperate Geng (π = 0.0016) and xian black rice (π = 0.0028) (Fig. 1f). This result suggests that functional OsKala4 likely originated in tropical geng populations before spreading to other subgroups through introgression—a hypothesis consistent with a 2015 study by Oikawa et al. [14]. Unlike OsKala4, which displayed divergent π values between temperate and tropical geng subgroups, OsMYB3 maintained uniformly low π values across geng subpopulations (Fig. 1g). This pattern implies that OsMYB3 was initially fixed in ancestral geng black rice prior to its introgression into xian subgroups.

It is notable that the OsRc gene responsible for red pericarp pigmentation showed similar selection patterns in black and white rice, with only 5.4% of black rice accessions (20 out of 367) retaining functional OsRc alleles (Fig. S5e). Direct selection for non-functional rc alleles in black rice through pericarp color is challenging, as black pigmentation may mask red coloration. This observation supports a sequential domestication model in which black rice emerged after the establishment of white rice, rather than directly from wild progenitors.

Differential selection signatures in genomic regions of black vs. white rice

To investigate genetic differentiation between black and white rice, we identified differentially selected regions in black rice in contrast to white rice using the XP-CLR method. Genome-wide scans employed 100-kb sliding windows with regions in the top 1% of XP-CLR scores defined as differentially selected. This analysis revealed 238 candidate regions containing 2656 non-TE-associated genes, representing 7.0% of annotated genes in the reference genome (Fig. 1h, Table S5).

To assess potential false positives among the 238 candidate selected regions arising from genetic linkage with OsKala4, we performed a targeted linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis of the genomic region surrounding OsKala4. We selected SNPs within a 1-Mb window centered on OsKala4 and computed pairwise LD (r2). The results indicate no strong LD between the OsKala4 locus and adjacent regions; notably, the selection interval containing OsKala4 (27.78–28.21 Mb) showed no significant LD with the nearest XP-CLR region (26.84–27.08 Mb) (Fig. S8), ruling out substantial physical linkage. Given the overall lack of high LD around OsKala4, very few—if any—of the 238 signals are artifactual due to linkage.

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis of these 2656 non-TE-associated genes within the selected region identified eight significantly enriched pathways, including biosynthesis of various plant secondary metabolites (Fig. S9). Because the most prominent difference between black and white rice is their pericarp color, we infer that these differentially selected regions are related to enhancement of the biosynthesis of anthocyanin and other pigmented secondary metabolites, although many unrelated genes therefore hitchhike during this selective process. Besides the black rice-specific OsKala4 and OsMYB3, the differentially selected genes also included other transcriptional factor genes from MYB, bHLH, WRKY, bZIP and BBX families. Members of these transcription factor families have been reported to be involved in regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis in plants. Additionally, five transport genes (OsGSTU6, OsGSTU38, OsGSTU45, OsMATE31 and OsMATE55) were also identified within the differentially selected regions. Members of these families are known to mediate anthocyanin or flavonoid transport from the cytoplasm into vacuoles for storage after biosynthesis [32]. Notably, no catalytic enzyme genes directly involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis were detected among the differentially selected genes.

Transcriptomic and metabolomic differences between black and white rice

Using transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses, we systematically profiled the temporal dynamics of gene expression and metabolite accumulation in developing seeds of black rice, and further compared these patterns with those of white rice. We first performed RNA-Seq using developing seeds from 18 representative black rice accessions and 20 white rice accessions at four developmental stages, i.e. 5 days after flower (DAF), 10 DAF, 15 DAF and 20 DAF. About 60.5% (22 909/37 838) of the annotated genes of the reference genome were expressed during the seed development of black rice, and about 40.7% (15 391/37 838) were constantly expressed throughout all the four developmental stages (Fig. 2a and b).

Figure 2.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Transcriptomic and metabolomic dynamics during black rice seed development. (a) Global transcriptome profiles across developmental stages. (b) Venn diagram of stage-specific expressed genes. (c) K-means clustering (k = 6) of developmentally regulated genes: I. Cluster-specific expression trajectories; II. Enrichment of anthocyanin-related gene within clusters; III. Heatmap visualization of cluster expression patterns. (d) Expression dynamics of anthocyanin biosynthesis genes during development. (e) Classification of all differentially accumulated metabolites. (f) Number of differentially expressed genes (left) and differentially accumulated metabolites (right) identified at different seed developmental stages. (g) Correlation-based co-expression network of key anthocyanin-related metabolites and genes.

Hierarchical clustering of transcriptome data across developmental stages delineated six distinct expression patterns (Clusters 1–6), each representing genes with coordinated transcriptional dynamics (Fig. 2c). We further analyzed the expression patterns of all known anthocyanin biosynthetic and regulatory genes. The results revealed that all anthocyanin biosynthetic genes (OsCHS, OsCHI, OsF3′H, OsF3H, OsDFR, OsANS and OsUFGT) and regulatory genes (OsKala4 and OsTTG1) were clustered in Cluster 2, except for OsMYB3. These genes exhibited a coordinated expression pattern characterized by an initial upregulation during the early seed developmental stage (5–10 DAF), peaking at 10 DAF, followed by a gradual downregulation in later developmental phases (Fig. 2c and d), while OsMYB3 was assigned to Cluster 6, a group characterized by transcriptional dynamics involving an early sharp expression peak (5 DAF) followed by progressive attenuation during seed development (Fig. 2c and d).

To systematically map the developmental metabolome divergence between black rice and white rice, we performed non-targeted metabolomic profiling of developing seed samples collected from 18 representative black rice accessions and 20 white rice accessions at four distinct developmental stages (5, 10, 15 and 20 DAF). We identified a total of 17 890 analytes in developing seeds of both black rice and white rice, and of these, 1675 metabolites were annotated with high confidence (Table S6). These annotated metabolites mainly belonged to flavonoids (including anthocyanins, proanthocyanin, flavones, flavans), fatty acids, lipids, terpenoids, phenolic acids, amino acids, organic acids (including certain vitamins), alkaloids (including certain vitamins) and others (Fig. 2e).

We compared transcriptome and metabolome datasets from developing seeds of black and white rice. This analysis revealed 227–8386 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and 21–537 differentially accumulated metabolites (DAMs) in black rice (Fig. 2f). Notably, black rice exhibited a significant predominance of upregulated DEGs and DAMs over downregulated counterparts. Comparative profiling at 5 DAF detected minimal molecular divergence between the black and white rice despite peak transcript abundance at this stage, indicating negligible transcriptomic and metabolomic differentiation during early seed development prior to activation of core anthocyanin biosynthesis regulators and their enzymatic cascades.

Synchronized activation of most DEGs and DAMs initiated at 10 DAF (Fig. 2f) temporally aligned with anthocyanin pathway induction. These coordinated molecular patterns underlie the metabolic signature of black rice: tissue-specific hyperaccumulation of flavonoids—particularly anthocyanins—in the pericarp, a trait absent in white rice.

We subsequently constructed a co-expression network to elucidate interactions among anthocyanin-related genes, integrating selective sweep loci with transcriptomic and metabolomic datasets (Fig. 2g). This network establishes a framework for pinpointing regulatory genes critical to anthocyanin biosynthesis in black rice. Beyond the previously reported components of the MYB-bHLH-WD40 (MBW) complex (i.e., OsMYB3, OsKala4 and OsTTG1) [14,30,33], our analysis revealed that other transcription factors such as OsWRKY1 and OsBBX13 exhibited strongly positive correlations with both flavonoid metabolite accumulation and the expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes.

Identification of regulatory genes of anthocyanin biosynthesis in black rice via multi-omics analysis

Through integrated genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses, we identified previously uncharacterized regulatory genes controlling anthocyanin biosynthesis in black rice, specifically OsWRKY1 and OsBBX13. The two transcription factor genes are not only located within genomic regions under differential selection between black and white rice (Fig. 1h), but also serve as central hubs within the co-expression network of anthocyanin pathway genes (Fig. 2g). Furthermore, OsWRKY1 and OsBBX13 exhibit marked differential expression during seed development between black and white rice (Fig. 3a and b). We further confirm their functions in modeling anthocyanin accumulation. Subcellular localization analysis demonstrated that OsBBX13, OsWRKY1, OsTTG1 and OsMYB3 were localized to the nucleus (Fig. 3c), consistent with their functional roles as transcriptional regulators. Protein–protein interaction assays, including yeast-two-hybrid and luciferase complementation imaging (LCI), further confirmed that OsWRKY1 interacts with OsTTG1, and OsBBX13 interacts with OsMYB3 (Fig. 3d–f). The dual-luciferase assay revealed that OsWRKY1 or OsBBX13 alone exhibited negligible or minimal activation effects on anthocyanin biosynthetic gene expression (Fig. 3g and h). However, in the presence of the MBW complex (OsMYB3-OsKala4-OsTTG1), OsWRKY1 specifically amplified the MBW complex-mediated activation of OsF3′H and OsDFR, while OsBBX13 synergistically enhanced the MBW complex-mediated transcriptional activation of OsF3H, OsF3′H and OsANS (Fig. 3g and h).

Figure 3.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Functional validation of OsWRKY1 and OsBBX13. (a and b) Expression levels of OsWRKY1 (a) and OsBBX13 (b). ** indicates statistical significance at P < 0.01 according to the two-tailed Student’s t-test. (c) Subcellular localization of OsBBX13, OsWRKY1, OsMYB3 and OsTTG1. (d) Yeast-two-hybrid validating the direct interaction of OsWRKY1 with OsTTG1, and OsBBX13 with OsMYB3. (e and f) LCI assay in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves confirming direct interaction of OsWRKY1 with OsTTG1 (e) and OsBBX13 with OsMYB3 (f). (g and h) Dual-luciferase assays showing transcriptional activation of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes by OsWRKY1 (g) and OsBBX13 (h). (i) Phenotypic comparison and anthocyanin quantification in OsWRKY1 and OsBBX13 knockout lines (n = 3). (j) Analysis of OsWRKY1 overexpression lines: phenotypes of mature seeds and target gene expression in developing seeds at 10 DAF (n = 3). (k) Anthocyanin content in mature seeds of OsWRKY1 overexpression lines (n = 3). (l) Analysis of OsBBX13 overexpression lines: phenotypes of mature seeds and target gene expression in developing seeds at 10 DAF (n = 3). (m) Anthocyanin content in seeds of OsBBX13 overexpression lines. All data indicate mean ± SD. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences; P < 0.05, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test.

Knockout of OsWRKY1 or OsBBX13 in the black rice accession W110 caused significantly attenuated seed anthocyanin content to 29.8%–44.5% of the WT control (Fig. 3i and Fig. S10). In contrast, overexpression of OsWRKY1 and OsBBX13 in W110 resulted in a significant increase in seed anthocyanin content by 57.4%–73.6% and 20.2%–36.8%, respectively (Fig. 3j–m). These results suggest that anthocyanin biosynthesis is the limiting factor for anthocyanin accumulation in this black rice background, and that both genes function as positive regulators that enhance the expression of upstream biosynthetic genes.

Genome-wide association study (GWAS) for anthocyanin content in black rice

We further conducted a GWAS for the black pericarp trait and seed anthocyanin content. First, we performed a GWAS for pericarp color across a mixed population comprising 367 black rice accessions and 202 white rice accessions. The results showed that the OsKala4 locus exhibited the strongest association signal, while OsMYB3 and OsWRKY1 were located near additional peak regions (Fig. S11).

Since the OsKala4 gene plays a decisive role in black rice formation, its strong effect may mask or interfere with the detection of other loci contributing to pericarp coloration. To minimize this confounding effect, we subsequently performed a GWAS specifically for seed anthocyanin content using only the black rice population over two consecutive years (2020–21) (Fig. 4a). This analysis identified 309 significantly associated loci, with a consistently significant locus at 10.08 Mb on chromosome 10, showing interannual reproducibility (Fig. 4b). Within this locus, we identified a rice gene ortholog (designated OsTT12) of the Arabidopsis thaliana multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) transporter TRANSPARENT TESTA12 (TT12), which mediates the transport of cyanidin-3-O-glucoside [34]. Haplotype analysis revealed significant anthocyanin content variation among OsTT12 haplotypes (Fig. 4c and d). Transport activity validation demonstrated that yeast vesicles expressing OsTT12 transported cyanidin-3-O-glucoside but not cyanidin (Fig. 4e), similar to Arabidopsis TT12 activity [34].

Figure 4.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

GWAS for seed anthocyanin content using the black rice population. (a) Manhattan plot for seed anthocyanin content in 2020 and 2021. (b) Distribution of SNPs in OsTT12. (c) Haplotype network of OsTT12. (d) Anthocyanin content of different haplotypes. (e) Validation of the transport capability of OsTT12 for cyanidin-3-O-glucoside in yeast microsomes. CPS, count per second. (f) Target gene expression in developing seeds of OsTT12 overexpression at 10 DAF. (g) Phenotypes and anthocyanin content of mature seeds of OsTT12 knockout and overexpression lines. All data indicate mean ± SD. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences; P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test.

OsTT12 knockout lines exhibited a partial but significant reduction in anthocyanin content, reaching 36.7%–50.0% compared to the W110 wild-type control, suggesting functional redundancy in anthocyanin transport. However, overexpression of OsTT12 in W110 did not significantly alter seed anthocyanin levels (Fig. 4f and g). The possible explanation is that downstream transport is not the bottleneck for anthocyanin accumulation in W110—in contrast to OsWRKY1 and OsBBX13 overexpression in W110, which confirmed that upstream anthocyanin biosynthesis is the limiting factor for anthocyanin accumulation in this background. These findings confirm OsTT12 as a functional transporter contributing to anthocyanin accumulation while implicating the existence of redundant transporters in black rice pigmentation.

Integrated biosynthetic pathway of phenolic acid and flavonoid in black rice

The health-promoting properties of black rice are largely attributed to its enriched polyphenolic profile including anthocyanins, proanthocyanidins and phenolic acids compared to white rice. These bioactive compounds are biosynthesized through the phenylpropanoid pathway. Our non-targeted metabolomic analysis identified a wide range of phenolic acid and flavonoid metabolites (Table S6). Among these, several delphinidin-derived anthocyanins, such as delphinidin 3-O-glucoside and malvidin 3-O-glucoside, were tentatively detected. Although it has conventionally been held that black rice lacks delphinidin-derived anthocyanins, our non-targeted results are consistent with several recent studies, including the review by Chen et al. [35], which reported the presence of such pigments in black rice.

Given that non-targeted metabolomic identifications can be unreliable due to challenges in distinguishing isobaric and isomeric compounds, incomplete reference spectral libraries and the probabilistic nature of matching algorithms, we further performed targeted metabolite analysis to validate these findings. We focused on anthocyanin profiling using whole-grain and bran samples from 30 distinct black rice accessions. Blue wheat, known to accumulate delphinidin-derived anthocyanins, was used as a positive control, while whole-grain red and white rice, expected to lack anthocyanins, served as negative controls (Fig. S12).

Using authentic standards, we confirmed the presence of seven major anthocyanin species. Their average concentrations, in descending order, were as follows: cyanidin 3-O-glucoside > peonidin 3-O-glucoside > cyanidin 3-O-rutinoside ≈ cyanidin 3,5-di-O-glucoside > peonidin 3,5-di-O-glucoside > delphinidin 3-O-glucoside > malvidin 3-O-glucoside (Fig. S12, Table S7). The targeted analysis confirmed the detectable presence—though at low absolute concentrations—of at least two delphinidin-derived anthocyanins, delphinidin 3-O-glucoside and malvidin 3-O-glucoside, verified against authentic standards. Additionally, three other anthocyanins (peonidin 3-O-rutinoside, pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside and petunidin 3-O-glucoside) were identified based on published ion-pair information (Table S8).

By integration of our experimentally obtained metabolomic and transcriptomic datasets with KEGG pathway annotations, we reconstructed a comprehensive biosynthetic pathway network for phenolic acids and flavonoids in black rice (Fig. 5). Based on KEGG annotations, 13 metabolites detected in our non-targeted metabolomic analysis were degradation products derived from the flavonoid pathway catabolism.

Figure 5.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Integrated flavonoid and phenolic acid metabolic pathway in black rice. Genes or metabolites in red represent DEGs or DAMs between black and white rice. Asterisk-labeled synthases indicate enzymes encoded by genes that show divergent π between black and white rice.

We identified biosynthetic genes within this network through KEGG annotations and further analyzed their evolutionary divergence (π) and transcriptional activity (transcripts per million, TPM). This integrated approach revealed 31 genes associated with phenolic acid and flavonoid metabolism. Transcriptomic profiling identified 13 significantly upregulated genes in black rice: OsPAL, OsPAL7, OsC4H, OsC4H1, OsCHS1, OsF3′H, OsF3H1, OsDFR, OsANS1, OsANS2, OsUFGT, OsF3′5′H1 and OsF3′5′H2. Subsequent population genetic analysis demonstrated significant π value differences between black and white rice accessions for OsPAL, OsC4H, OsCHS1, OsF3′H, OsDFR, OsANS1, OsANS2, OsUFGT and OsF3′5′H. Notably, anthocyanin transporters, including glutathione S-transferase (GST), MATE and ATP-binding cassette (ABC) families, exhibited differential expression patterns and selection signatures across rice cultivars. Further functional characterization of these transporters is required to elucidate their regulatory mechanisms in anthocyanin accumulation.

Breeding status and agronomic trait evaluation of black rice

Anthocyanin biosynthesis in black rice is a potential factor affecting its agronomic traits, particularly yield. Black rice varieties are generally considered to have a yield disadvantage relative to commonly cultivated white rice varieties [36]. To assess the overall breeding status of black rice, we first assessed the selection status of 225 quantitative trait genes (QTGs) in our black rice collection compared to 202 white rice accessions using RiceNavi [37]. The analysis revealed that the black rice population harbors extensive natural variation, indicating that this germplasm resource possesses substantial allelic diversity (Fig. 6a). Comparison of quantitative trait nucleotide (QTN) allele frequencies between black and white rice populations showed that most of them were similar (Table S9).

Figure 6.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Genotype matrix of 225 QTGs in black rice and white rice accessions. (a) A total of 348 causative QTNs for 225 QTGs were genotyped for 367 black rice accessions and 202 white rice accessions. QTGs are classified into nine categories. The number of QTNs and QTGs (in brackets) for each category are shown on the left. Light blue, dark blue, light green, yellow and gray boxes represent the genotype for the Nipponbare reference (Ref.) allele, alternative (Alt.) allele, heterozygous, multiple alleles and deletion, respectively. (b) QTNs with highly differentiated allele frequency (difference > 0.2) between black and white rice subpopulations, and with an allele frequency of >0.4 in at least one subpopulation. (c) Genomic location and allelic distribution of causative QTNs in the Waxy gene.

However, we also found some QTNs with relatively high allele differences between black rice and white rice subpopulations. For instance, besides the well-documented pigmentation regulator OsKala4 (which harbors a functional QTN exclusive to black rice), we found a causative QTN conferring glutinous grain characteristics in the Waxy gene—a key regulator of amylose content. This QTN is present in approximately 50% of the black rice accessions but absent in all 202 white rice accessions (Fig. 6b and c). The selection preference for glutinous texture in black rice may be explained by its typical consumption as whole-grain rice. Since anthocyanins are concentrated in the pericarp, removing the bran (as in white rice) would eliminate the nutritional benefit. Therefore, the soft and palatable texture resulting from the glutinous trait after cooking was likely a key factor aligning with consumer preferences for whole-grain products.

To directly evaluate if anthocyanin biosynthesis reduces yield, we developed two pairs of black and white rice sister lines (F6) from two independent crosses: Huanghuazhan (white rice)/Jinzi No.1 (black rice) and Huamoxiang (black rice)/Jiayouguojing (white rice) (Fig. S13a). Each pair shared a highly similar genetic background (>96% similarity) but differed in pericarp color (black vs. white) due to the presence/absence of the functional OsKala4 allele (Fig. S13b and S13c).

Phenotypic comparison revealed that the black rice lines consistently showed reduced yield per plant. However, the extent of reduction differed: one pair showed a statistically significant decrease of 20.7% (P = 0.0032), while the other showed a non-significant trend of 6.0% (P = 0.1103) (Fig. S13d). The yield gap was associated with significantly lower grain width, 1000-grain weight and seed-setting rate in the black lines (Fig. S13d). Notably, the pair with higher genetic similarity (98.36%) exhibited a smaller yield difference than the pair with lower similarity (96.02%) (Fig. S13b and S13c).

DISCUSSION

Plant domestication is an artificial selection process through which humans genetically and morphologically reshape wild progenitors to meet agricultural needs. This artificial selection paradigm has enabled the development of crops with enhanced yield, edibility, storage capacity and agronomic adaptability [38–41]. Rice, domesticated from its wild ancestor O. rufipogon approximately 13 000 years ago, exemplifies this transformative process [42–44]. Through sustained selection for favorable alleles, early farmers shaped critical domestication syndromes including reduced seed shattering (Ossh4) [27–29], reduced awn length and loss of barbs (OsLABA1) [26], optimized plant architecture (OsPROG1) [22–24], reduced hull color (OsBh4) [25] etc. Crucially, archaeogenetic evidence supports a single-origin domestication model for rice with subsequent introgression events: geng subspecies arose directly from wild progenitors in the Yangtze Basin, whereas xian emerged through hybridization between early domesticated geng and local wild populations [6,38,45]. This dual-path domestication underscores the dynamic interplay between human selection and natural genetic exchange in crop evolution.

Pigmented rice, primarily comprising red and black rice, accounts for a relatively small proportion of rice germplasm resources but possesses higher nutritional value. It is well-established that wild rice (O. rufipogon) consistently has a red pericarp due to proanthocyanidin accumulation. During rice domestication, loss-of-function mutations in the Rc gene—primarily a 14-bp deletion in exon 6 (the recessive rc allele)—resulted in the non-pigmented pericarp characteristic of white cultivated rice. This rc allele is fixed in most modern cultivated rice as a key domestication allele, having originated before the divergence of major rice subspecies [13].

Despite strong selection for white pericarp in cultivated rice, red pericarp persists in some varieties through several mechanisms: direct inheritance from wild ancestors; re-domestication of weedy rice, which is the process of harnessing beneficial alleles (such as those for stress resilience) from these de-domesticated populations; and continuous human selection driven by nutritional advantages or adaptive benefits in certain regions [46].

In contrast, black rice emerged later in rice evolution, arising from a gain-of-function mutation in the OsKala4 gene, enabling anthocyanin biosynthesis. Our genomic evidence indicates that black rice originates from white rice: only 5.4% of black rice accessions carry a functional OsRc allele, while the rest carry the domesticated rc allele with the 14-bp deletion in exon 6. This finding suggests that black rice originated through post-domestication improvement. The rare functional OsRc alleles observed in black rice populations are likely introduced via introgression from red rice (Fig. 7).

Figure 7.

For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Evolutionary trajectory of black rice and its multi-omics divergence from white rice. Pericarp color is indicated by text labels (‘red’, ‘white’, ‘black’).

Taken together, red rice represents an ancient wild-type trait inherited from ancestral rice, characterized by the accumulation of proanthocyanidins and the absence of anthocyanin production. By contrast, black rice originated through post-domestication improvement and, as a result, has acquired the ability to accumulate anthocyanins, irrespective of proanthocyanidin presence. This evolutionary and biochemical distinction offers a clear, trait-based classification criterion for differentiating between these two types of pigmented rice.

Genome-wide scans identified 238 differentially selected regions between black and white rice. We propose that these regions in black rice are functionally associated with pericarp pigmentation, as this trait represents the most pronounced phenotypic divergence between the two rice groups. This hypothesis can be supported by two lines of evidence: (i) early developmental uniformity: at 5 DAF, when anthocyanin biosynthesis remains inactive, transcriptomic and metabolomic divergence between black and white rice was minimal (0.61% DEGs and 0.54% DAMs), with divergence escalating rapidly from 10 DAF onward, coinciding with anthocyanin pathway activation; (ii) functional validation: transcription factors (e.g. OsBBX13, OsWRKY1) within these selected regions were experimentally confirmed to regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis, directly linking their selection to pigmentation. These selected regions drive extensive transcriptomic reprogramming (up to 22% DEGs during seed development) and metabolomic remodeling (up to 32% DAMs during seed development). However, many DEGs/DAMs showed no direct linkage to anthocyanin or flavonoid pathways. This could be explained by either genetic hitchhiking of unrelated alleles during differential selection between black and white rice varieties, or pleiotropic effects of pigmentation-related regulators. For example, OsMYB3, a black rice-specific pigmentation gene, has been reported to regulate both anthocyanin biosynthesis and grain size [30,47], demonstrating unintended trait correlations. These findings underscore a critical challenge in black rice breeding: balancing nutritional enhancement (achieved through anthocyanin enrichment) with essential agronomic traits. This highlights the necessity for precision breeding strategies that can decouple nutritional improvement from essential agronomic characteristics during cultivar development.

The MBW transcriptional complex (MYB-bHLH-WD40) serves as a central regulatory module for flavonoid biosynthesis across plant species, directly activating anthocyanin biosynthetic pathways [48,49]. In rice, canonical MBW components—including MYB (OsC1, OsPL, OsMYB3), bHLH partners (OsKala4, OsRb, OsPa, OsPs) and WD40 scaffold (OsTTG1)—have been systematically characterized through map-based cloning and multi-omics approaches [14,30,31,33,48–51]. Our study extends this paradigm by identifying three previously uncharacterized regulators (OsWRKY1, OsBBX13 and OsTT12) that orchestrate anthocyanin synthesis and compartmentalization in black rice through integrated multi-omics profiling and GWAS (Table S10). Mechanistically, OsBBX13 physically interacts with the MBW component OsMYB3, while OsWRKY1 interacts with OsTTG1, synergistically amplifying the transcriptional activation of key anthocyanin biosynthetic genes (e.g. OsF3′H, OsDFR, OsANS) (Fig. 3d–h).

Synthesized on the cytoplasmic surface of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), anthocyanins are transported to the vacuole for storage. This process relies on a coordinated multi-protein system: cytosolic GSTs escort pigments to the tonoplast, where MATE and ABC transporters then mediate their final import into the vacuolar lumen [52]. Several rice transporters have been validated to participate in anthocyanin transport. For instance, simultaneous knockout of OsGSTU34 (a Tau-class GST), OsMRP15 (a C-type ABC transporter) and OsAnP (an AtTT12 homolog) results in loss of purple pigmentation in leaves [53]. Mackon et al. further confirmed that knockout of OsGSTU34 alone in black rice leads to a significant reduction in anthocyanin accumulation across various tissues, including seeds [54]. In the present study, knockout of the vacuolar transporter OsTT12 causes only a partial reduction in seed anthocyanins, suggesting functional redundancy with other transporters, likely the tonoplast-localized OsMRP15, unlike the cytoplasmic OsGSTU34. The possibility that other rice transporters are also involved in anthocyanin transport cannot be ruled out. The rice genome is estimated to harbor approximately 62 GSTs [55], 46 MATEs [56] and 12 multidrug resistance-associated proteins (MRPs) [57]. Notably, several members, including OsGSTU6, OsGSTU38, OsGSTU45, OsMATE31 and OsMATE55 are located within genomic regions under differential selection between black and white rice. Nevertheless, the full complement of transporters participating in anthocyanin sequestration and their functional relationships requires further systematic investigation.

Moreover, transcriptional activation assays in protoplasts demonstrated that the MBW complex upregulates the expression of OsWRKY1 and OsBBX13 (Fig. S14a). Consistent with a role in anthocyanin biosynthesis under MBW regulation, the expression patterns of OsWRKY1 and OsBBX13 closely resembled those of OsKala4 and the MBW-activated anthocyanin biosynthetic genes, showing significantly higher expression in black rice seeds compared with white rice seeds (Fig. 3a and b). In contrast, OsTT12 appears to play a universal role in rice, as its expression was not significantly regulated by the MBW complex, OsWRKY1, OsBBX13 or their associated complexes in our assays (Fig. S14b). This is consistent with the distinct expression profile of OsTT12, which differs from that of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes and shows no significant differential expression between black and white rice seeds (Fig. S14c). Collectively, our findings reveal a multi-layered regulatory mechanism that fine-tunes anthocyanin flux in black rice, with OsWRKY1 and OsBBX13 integrated into the MBW hierarchy, while OsTT12 functions in a parallel, constitutive manner.

Relatively low yield is a major constraint for the widespread cultivation of black rice. Although the underlying mechanisms are not fully elucidated, several hypotheses have been proposed: (i) competition for metabolic resources due to the substantial energy and carbon sink strength of anthocyanin biosynthesis; (ii) reduced photosynthetic efficiency caused by anthocyanin accumulation in the pericarp and other vegetative tissues (e.g. leaf, hull), which can shade chloroplasts and potentially lower chlorophyll content; and (iii) inherent agronomic weaknesses in many black rice varieties, such as susceptibility to lodging, late maturity and high vulnerability to blast disease (Magnaporthe oryzae), leading to additional yield losses [36]. The first two reasons are directly linked to anthocyanin biosynthesis. Our previous research demonstrated that the MYB transcription factor gene OsC1 specifically determines anthocyanin synthesis in leaves; its loss of function eliminates leaf pigmentation without affecting anthocyanin synthesis in seeds [31]. Therefore, minimizing anthocyanin accumulation in vegetative tissues, especially leaves—the primary organ for photosynthesis—is a viable strategy to alleviate the yield penalty in black rice without compromising its nutritional value. The third reason, however, appears to be related to the low level of breeding efforts for black rice. This is because white rice dominates the market, leading most breeders to focus solely on the development of white rice varieties.

In this study, evaluation of agronomic traits using two pairs of black and white rice sister lines confirmed that the black rice lines had a yield disadvantage compared to their white counterparts. However, the two pairs of sister lines differed in their genetic similarity (98.36% vs. 96.02%), and the pair with a higher similarity exhibited a much smaller yield gap (Fig. S13b–S13d). This suggests that the yield reduction in black rice is at least partly attributable to the linkage between pericarp color genes and unintended, yield-penalizing alleles in the genetic background, since minimizing genetic differences appears to mitigate the yield gap between black and white rice.

Furthermore, grain width, grain weight and seed setting rate were consistently and significantly lower in both black rice lines compared to their white counterparts. These three traits likely represent a physiological/metabolic cost associated with anthocyanin biosynthesis in black rice, potentially caused by anthocyanin biosynthesis itself or linkage drag. Consequently, targeted improvement of these traits presents a promising strategy for reducing the yield gap. Our analysis of the selection status for the 225 QTNs within the black rice collection will directly facilitate this targeted breeding approach.

In conclusion, this study constructs a global black rice germplasm resource comprising 367 accessions, and employs integrated multi-omics approaches (genomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics) to systematically dissect the genetic and molecular divergence between black and white rice. Population genomic analyses unveil a two-step domestication trajectory: initial loss of proanthocyanidin pigmentation through Rc inactivation, followed by OsKala4- and OsMYB3-driven anthocyanin pathway activation under artificial selection. Multi-omics profiling identifies 238 differentially selected loci that drive substantial transcriptomic and metabolomic remodeling, with functional validation demonstrating that newly identified fine tuners (OsWRKY1, OsBBX13, OsTT12) synergistically enhance the MBW transcriptional complex to coordinate regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis and vacuolar sequestration. Furthermore, the analysis of QTN selection status and agronomic trait differences between black and white rice provides valuable insights for the targeted genetic improvement of black rice varieties. These findings not only advance our understanding of pigmentation evolution in black rice but also provide a molecular roadmap for precision breeding programs to decouple nutritional enhancement from agronomic trade-offs, thereby facilitating the development of elite black rice cultivars with optimized nutritional and agronomic performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Genome sequencing of black rice collection

A global collection of 367 black rice accessions was sequenced (∼20× coverage). Clean reads were aligned to the Nipponbare reference genome (IRGSP-1.0). Approximately 4.3 million high-confidence SNPs were identified using the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) [58].

Population genetics analysis

A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was reconstructed based on a pairwise genetic distance matrix computed with PLINK [59] and visualized in MEGA [60] and iTOL [61]. Population structure was inferred using ADMIXTURE [62], and PCA was performed with GCTA [63]. Selective sweeps were identified using XP-CLR [64]. Fst and π were calculated in 10-kb windows using VCFtools [65]. Haplotype networks were constructed from high-quality SNPs after variant imputation and phasing with Beagle [66], and visualized using Haplotype Viewer. RiceNavi software was employed to identify QTNs [37].

Transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis

Transcriptomic and non-targeted metabolomic analyses were conducted using developing seeds of black and white rice collected at 5, 10, 15 and 20 DAF. RNA-Seq was conducted by the Smartgenomics Technology Institute (Tianjin, China), and the transcriptomic data were processed to identify DEGs using DESeq2 [67]. Non-targeted metabolomic analysis was conducted by the BioTree Biotech Co. (Shanghai, China), and DAMs were identified through OPLS-DA. Additionally, targeted anthocyanin quantification was performed on mature seeds via LC-MS/MS, with the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions for each analyte provided in Table S11. Finally, an integrated co-expression network was constructed by calculating Pearson’s correlations (∣r∣ > 0.3) among metabolites, biosynthetic genes and transcription factors, and visualized using Gephi [68].

In vitro gene function analysis

Protein–protein interactions were tested using a yeast-two-hybrid assay in AH109 cells and an LCI assay [69]. For subcellular localization, the coding sequences of candidate genes were fused to mCherry in the pM999 vector, transiently expressed in rice protoplasts, and imaged by confocal microscopy. The dual-luciferase assay was conducted in rice protoplasts, measuring the activation of anthocyanin gene promoters (e.g. OsCHS, OsDFR) by candidate regulators. The in vitro transport of anthocyanin substrates by OsTT12 was assayed in a yeast system according to Zhao et al. [70].

GWAS

A GWAS was performed using factored spectrally transformed linear mixed models provided by the FaST-LMM program [71].

Knockout and overexpression transformation

The CRISPR/Cas9 knockout vectors were constructed according to Ma et al. [53]. The full-length cDNA sequences of OsWRKY1, OsBBX13 and OsTT12 were isolated from black rice for overexpression vector construction. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of black rice was performed following the protocol of Lin et al. [72]. All primers are listed in Table S12.

Development and agronomic comparison of black and white rice sister lines

Two pairs of black and white rice sister lines from separate crosses were developed, and their key agronomic traits were compared in a field trial following a randomized block design.

For more details on the Materials and Methods, please refer to the Supplementary data.

Supplementary Material

nwaf497_Supplemental_Files

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, the National Mid-term Genebank for Rice of the China National Rice Research Institute, the Shandong Rice Research Institute, and other institutions for providing the black rice germplasm collection. We thank the National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement of Huazhong Agricultural University for providing the bioinformatics platform.

Contributor Information

Zaihui Zhou, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.

Zenan Yang, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.

Qinglu Zhang, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.

Xushi Wang, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.

Qiu Chen, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.

Xinyao Yu, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.

Yao Zhou, State Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.

Yidan Ouyang, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

Jianwei Zhang, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

Weibo Xie, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

Qifa Zhang, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

Hao Chen, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The raw datasets used for whole-genome resequencing, RNA-Seq, were deposited into the China National Center for Bioinformation (CNCB) SRA database under the accession numbers PRJCA044699 and PRJCA026531.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2024YFF1000600), the Biological Breeding-Major Projects (2022ZD0402001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32261143466), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2662025SKPY007), the Hubei Fund to Support High Quality Development of Seed Industry (HBZY2023B001-08), the Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2023AFA043), the HZAU-AGIS Cooperation Fund (SZYJY2023013), the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-01), and the Hubei Key Laboratory of Food Crop Germplasm and Genetic Improvement (2024lzjj13).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Z.Z.: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, writing—original draft. Z.Y.: data curation, investigation, resources, validation. Q.Z.: data curation, investigation, resources, validation. X.W.: investigation. Q.C.: validation. X.Y.: validation. Y.Z., Y.O., J.Z., W.X.: writing—review & editing. Q.Z.: conceptualization, writing—review & editing. H.C: conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision, writing—original draft, writing—review & editing.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Yuan  S, Linquist  BA, Wilson  LT  et al.  Sustainable intensification for a larger global rice bowl. Nat Commun  2021; 12: 7163. 10.1038/s41467-021-27424-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Wu  Y, Zeng  J, Zhang  F  et al.  Integrative analysis of omics summary data reveals putative mechanisms underlying complex traits. Nat Commun  2018; 9: 918. 10.1038/s41467-018-03371-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Qin  P, Lu  H, Du  H  et al.  Pan-genome analysis of 33 genetically diverse rice accessions reveals hidden genomic variations. Cell  2021; 184: 3542–58. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Shang  LG, Li  XX, He  HY  et al.  A super pan-genomic landscape of rice. Cell Res  2022; 32: 878–96. 10.1038/s41422-022-00685-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Li  JY, Wang  J, Zeigler  RS. The 3,000 rice genomes project: new opportunities and challenges for future rice research. GigaSci  2014; 3: 8. 10.1186/2047-217X-3-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Huang  X, Kurata  N, Wei  X  et al.  A map of rice genome variation reveals the origin of cultivated rice. Nature  2012; 490: 497–501. 10.1038/nature11532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Wang  W, Mauleon  R, Hu  Z  et al.  Genomic variation in 3,010 diverse accessions of Asian cultivated rice. Nature  2018; 557: 43–9. 10.1038/s41586-018-0063-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Yang  L, He  W, Zhu  Y  et al.  GWAS meta-analysis using a graph-based pan-genome enhanced gene mining efficiency for agronomic traits in rice. Nat Commun  2025; 16: 3171. 10.1038/s41467-025-58081-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zhao  Q, Feng  Q, Lu  H  et al.  Pan-genome analysis highlights the extent of genomic variation in cultivated and wild rice. Nat Genet  2018; 50: 278–84. 10.1038/s41588-018-0041-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Wei  X, Chen  MJ, Zhang  Q  et al.  Genomic investigation of 18,421 lines reveals the genetic architecture of rice. Science  2024; 385: eadm8762. 10.1126/science.adm8762 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Guo  D, Li  Y, Lu  H  et al.  A pangenome reference of wild and cultivated rice. Nature  2025; 642: 662–71. 10.1038/s41586-025-08883-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Chen  Z, Bu  QY, Liu  GF  et al.  Genomic decoding of breeding history to guide breeding-by-design in rice. Natl Sci Rev  2023; 10: nwad029. 10.1093/nsr/nwad029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Sweeney  MT, Thomson  MJ, Pfeil  BE  et al.  Caught red-handed: rc encodes a basic helix-loop-helix protein conditioning red pericarp in rice. Plant Cell  2006; 18: 283–94. 10.1105/tpc.105.038430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Oikawa  T, Maeda  H, Oguchi  T  et al.  The birth of a black rice gene and its local spread by introgression. Plant Cell  2015; 27: 2401–14. 10.1105/tpc.15.00310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Zhao  H, Yao  W, Ouyang  YD  et al.  RiceVarMap: a comprehensive database of rice genomic variations. Nucleic Acids Res  2015; 43: D1018–22. 10.1093/nar/gku894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Leonarski  E, Kuasnei  M, Cesca  K  et al.  Black rice and its by-products: anthocyanin-rich extracts and their biological potential. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr  2024; 64: 9261–79. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Sedeek  K, Zuccolo  A, Fornasiero  A  et al.  Multi-omics resources for targeted agronomic improvement of pigmented rice. Nat Food  2023; 4: 366–71. 10.1038/s43016-023-00742-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Yang  Z, Li  D, Wei  R  et al.  Whole grain black rice: a paradigm shift from mainly calories to a nutritious food that benefits human health. Sci China Life Sci  2025; 68: 2173–6. 10.1007/s11427-024-2845-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Zhang  Q. Purple tomatoes, black rice and food security. Nat Rev Genet  2021; 22: 414. 10.1038/s41576-021-00359-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Zhang  Q, Jauhar  A, Howarth  B  et al.  Developing green nutritious super rice for a healthy Anthropocene. Sci Bull  2025; 70: 2916–20. 10.1016/j.scib.2025.04.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Zheng  X, Pang  H, Wang  J  et al.  Genomic signatures of domestication and adaptation during geographical expansions of rice cultivation. Plant Biotechnol J  2022; 20: 16–8. 10.1111/pbi.13730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Jin  J, Huang  W, Gao  JP  et al.  Genetic control of rice plant architecture under domestication. Nat Genet  2008; 40: 1365–9. 10.1038/ng.247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Tan  LB, Li  XR, Liu  FX  et al.  Control of a key transition from prostrate to erect growth in rice domestication. Nat Genet  2008; 40: 1360–4. 10.1038/ng.197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wang  YH, Li  JY. Rice, rising. Nat Genet  2008; 40: 1273–5. 10.1038/ng1108-1273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Zhu  BF, Si  LZ, Wang  ZX  et al.  Genetic control of a transition from black to straw-white seed hull in rice domestication. Plant Physiol  2011; 155: 1301–11. 10.1104/pp.110.168500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hua  L, Wang  D, Tan  L  et al.  LABA1, a domestication gene associated with long, barbed awns in wild rice. Plant Cell  2015; 27: 1875–88. 10.1105/tpc.15.00260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Li  CB, Zhou  AL, Sang  T. Genetic analysis of rice domestication syndrome with the wild annual species, Oryza nivara. New Phytol  2006; 170: 185–94. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01647.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Li  C, Zhou  A, Sang  T. Rice domestication by reducing shattering. Science  2006; 311: 1936–9. 10.1126/science.1123604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lin  Z, Griffith  ME, Li  X  et al.  Origin of seed shattering in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Planta  2007; 226: 11–20. 10.1007/s00425-006-0460-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zheng  J, Wu  H, Zhao  MC  et al.  OsMYB3 is a R2R3-MYB gene responsible for anthocyanin biosynthesis in black rice. Mol Breeding  2021; 41: 51. 10.1007/s11032-021-01244-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Zheng  J, Wu  H, Zhu  HB  et al.  Determining factors, regulation system, and domestication of anthocyanin biosynthesis in rice leaves. New Phytol  2019; 223: 705–21. 10.1111/nph.15807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Manzoor  MA, Sabir  IA, Shah  IH  et al.  Flavonoids: a review on biosynthesis and transportation mechanism in plants. Funct Integr Genomics  2023; 23: 212. 10.1007/s10142-023-01147-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Yang  X, Wang  J, Xia  X  et al.  OsTTG1, a WD40 repeat gene, regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis in rice. Plant J  2021; 107: 198–214. 10.1111/tpj.15285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Marinova  K, Pourcel  L, Weder  B  et al.  The Arabidopsis MATE transporter TT12 acts as a vacuolar flavonoid/H-antiporter active in proanthocyanidin-accumulating cells of the seed coat. Plant Cell  2007; 19: 2023–38. 10.1105/tpc.106.046029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Chen  T, Xie  LM, Wang  G  et al.  Anthocyanins-natural pigment of colored rice bran: composition and biological activities. Food Res Int  2024; 175: 113722. 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Lap  B, Magudeeswari  P, Tyagi  W  et al.  Genetic analysis of purple pigmentation in rice seed and vegetative parts—implications on developing high-yielding purple rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Appl Genet  2024; 65: 241–54. 10.1007/s13353-023-00825-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Wei  X, Qiu  J, Yong  KC  et al.  A quantitative genomics map of rice provides genetic insights and guides breeding. Nat Genet  2021; 53: 243–53. 10.1038/s41588-020-00769-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Wu  D, Xie  L, Sun  Y  et al.  A syntelog-based pan-genome provides insights into rice domestication and de-domestication. Genome Biol  2023; 24: 179. 10.1186/s13059-023-03017-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Civáň  P, Craig  H, Cox  CJ  et al.  Three geographically separate domestications of Asian rice. Nat Plants  2015; 1: 15164. 10.1038/nplants.2015.164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Gross  BL, Zhao  Z. Archaeological and genetic insights into the origins of domesticated rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2014; 111: 6190–7. 10.1073/pnas.1308942110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Molina  J, Sikora  M, Garud  N  et al.  Molecular evidence for a single evolutionary origin of domesticated rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2011; 108: 8351–6. 10.1073/pnas.1104686108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Huang  XH, Zhao  Y, Wei  XH  et al.  Genome-wide association study of flowering time and grain yield traits in a worldwide collection of rice germplasm. Nat Genet  2012; 44: 32–9. 10.1038/ng.1018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Jing  CY, Zhang  FM, Wang  XH  et al.  Multiple domestications of Asian rice. Nat Plants  2023; 9: 1221–35. 10.1038/s41477-023-01476-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Xu  R, Sun  C. What happened during domestication of wild to cultivated rice. Crop J  2021; 9: 564–76. 10.1016/j.cj.2021.02.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Choi  JY, Purugganan  MD. Multiple origin but single domestication led to Oryza sativa. G3-Genes Genom Genet  2018; 8: 797–803. 10.1534/g3.117.300334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Xie  L, Wu  D, Fang  Y  et al.  Population genomic analysis unravels the evolutionary roadmap of pericarp color in rice. Plant Commun  2024; 5: 100778. 10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Li  QP, Lu  L, Liu  HY  et al.  A minor QTL,SG3, encoding an R2R3-MYB protein, negatively controls grain length in rice. Theor Appl Genet  2020; 133: 2387–99. 10.1007/s00122-020-03606-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Zhou  Z, Li  H, Wei  R  et al.  RNA-seq reveals transcriptional differences in anthocyanin and vitamin biosynthetic pathways between black and white rice. Gene  2022; 844: 146845. 10.1016/j.gene.2022.146845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Hu  W, Zhou  T, Han  Z  et al.  Dominant complementary interaction between OsC1 and two tightly linked genes, Rb1 and Rb2, controls the purple leaf sheath in rice. Theor Appl Genet  2020; 133: 2555–66. 10.1007/s00122-020-03617-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Sun  XM, Zhang  ZY, Chen  C  et al.  The C–S–A gene system regulates hull pigmentation and reveals evolution of anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway in rice. J Exp Bot  2018; 69: 1485–98. 10.1093/jxb/ery001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Qiao  WH, Wang  YY, Xu  R  et al.  A functional chromogen gene C from wild rice is involved in a different anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway in indica and japonica. Theor Appl Genet  2021; 134: 1531–43. 10.1007/s00122-021-03787-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Zhao  J. Flavonoid transport mechanisms: how to go, and with whom. Trends Plant Sci  2015; 20: 576–85. 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Ma  X, Zhang  Q, Zhu  Q  et al.  A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol Plant  2015; 8: 1274–84. 10.1016/j.molp.2015.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Mackon  E, Guo  Y, Mackon  GCJDE  et al.  OsGSTU34, a Bz2-like anthocyanin-related glutathione transferase transporter, is essential for rice (Oryza sativa L.) organs coloration. Phytochemistry  2024; 217: 113896. 10.1186/s12862-021-01873-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Soranzo  N, Gorla  MS, Mizzi  L  et al.  Organisation and structural evolution of the rice glutathione S-transferase gene family. Mol Genet Genomics  2004; 271: 511–21. 10.1007/s00438-004-1006-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Du  ZX, Su  QT, Wu  Z  et al.  Genome-wide characterization of MATE gene family and expression profiles in response to abiotic stresses in rice (Oryza sativa). BMC Ecol Evol  2021; 21: 141. 10.1186/s12862-021-01873-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Jasinski  M, Ducos  E, Martinoia  E  et al.  The ATP-binding cassette transporters: structure, function, and gene family comparison between rice and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol  2003; 131: 1169–77. 10.1104/pp.102.014720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. McKenna  A, Hanna  M, Banks  E  et al.  The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res  2010; 20: 1297–303. 10.1101/gr.107524.110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Purcell  S, Neale  B, Todd-Brown  K  et al.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet  2007; 81: 559–75. 10.1086/519795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Kumar  S, Stecher  G, Li  M  et al.  MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol  2018; 35: 1547–9. 10.1093/molbev/msy096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Letunic  I, Bork  P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res  2024; 52  (W1): W78–82. 10.1093/nar/gkae268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Alexander  DH, Novembre  J, Lange  K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res  2009; 19: 1655–64. 10.1101/gr.094052.109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Yang  JA, Lee  SH, Goddard  ME  et al.  GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am J Hum Genet  2011; 88: 76–82. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Chen  H, Patterson  N, Reich  D. Population differentiation as a test for selective sweeps. Genome Res  2010; 20: 393–402. 10.1101/gr.100545.109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Danecek  P, Auton  A, Abecasis  G  et al.  The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics  2011; 27: 2156–8. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Browning  BL, Zhou  Y, Browning  SR. A one-penny imputed genome from next-generation reference panels. Am J Hum Genet  2018; 103: 338–48. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.07.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Love  MI, Huber  W, Anders  S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol  2014; 15: 550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Bastian  M, Heymann  S, Jacomy  M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: ICWSM Proceedings of the Third AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, San Jose, CA, USA, 17–20 May 2009. Vol. 3, pp. 361–2. 10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Chen  H, Zou  Y, Shang  Y  et al.  Firefly luciferase complementation imaging assay for protein-protein interactions in plants. Plant Physiol  2008; 146: 323–4. 10.1104/pp.107.111740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Zhao  J, Dixon  RA. MATE transporters facilitate vacuolar uptake of epicatechin 3′-O-glucoside for proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in Medicago truncatula and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell  2009; 21: 2323–40. 10.1105/tpc.109.067819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Lippert  C, Listgarten  J, Liu  Y  et al.  FaST linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies. Nat Methods  2011; 8: 833–5. 10.1038/nmeth.1681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Lin  Y, Chen  H, Cao  Y  et al.  Establishment of high-efficiency Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation system of Mudanjiang 8. (in Chinese) Acta Agron Sin  2002; 28: 294–300. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

nwaf497_Supplemental_Files

Data Availability Statement

The raw datasets used for whole-genome resequencing, RNA-Seq, were deposited into the China National Center for Bioinformation (CNCB) SRA database under the accession numbers PRJCA044699 and PRJCA026531.


Articles from National Science Review are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES