Abstract
Introduction
The World Trade Center (WTC) collapse produced an inhalation disaster. Body Mass index (BMI) is a risk-factor for WTC-related lung injury. Visit-to-visit-forced-expiratory-volume-at-one-second-variation (FEV1-variation) is a mortality risk-factor in WTC-exposed Fire Department of New York (FDNY) workers. We hypothesized: worsened-FEV1-variation with greater time post-9/11/2001 will be a mortality risk-factor associated with cross sectional BMI and longitudinal weight-variation.
Methods
Annual WTC-monitoring measured lung function and weight. FEV1-variation was quantified as individual-specific coefficient of variation (CV) and FEV1-slope-SEM, among 9410 WTC-exposed workers who were alive at the 1/1/2019 Landmark and had ≥ 3 FEV1-measurments early (9/12/2001 through 12/31/2009) and later (1/1/2010 through 12/31/2018). Weight-variation quantified as individual-specific weight-CV 9/12/2001 through 12/31/2018. Worsened-FEV1-variation was defined as later/early FEV1-variation ratio > 1. The outcome was all-cause mortality 1/1/2019 through 12/31/23. Cox regression assessed the 5-year mortality risk of Worsened-FEV1-variation. Logistic regression assessed covariates associated with worsened-FEV1-variation.
Results
Fourty-seven percent (4459/9410) of WTC-exposed FDNY-workers experienced worsened-FEV1-variation. an exposure that was associated with 40% greater 5-year mortality risk (HR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.07, 1.89) in a Cox model adjusted for landmark, age, FEV1, BMI, weight-variation, and smoking. Similarly, Worsened-FEV1-variation defined by FEV1-slope-SEM was a mortality risk factor (HR = 1.39; 95% CI 1.05, 1.83). Each 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI and each 5%CV increased weight-variation was associated with 18% and 17% greater odds of worsened-FEV1-variation (OR = 1.18; 95% CI 1.06, 1.27 and OR = 1.17; 95% CI 1.07, 1.27 respectively).
Interpretation
Worsened-FEV1-variation with greater time post-9/11/2001 is a mortality risk-factor associated with obesity and weight-variation. The association of Worsened-FEV1-variation and weight-variation may reflect concurrent metabolic and pulmonary instability that increase vulnerability to death.
Keywords: Mortality, FEV1 variation trajectory, Body Mass Index Trajectory, World Trade Center Exposure
Introduction
Terrorists attacked the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001 (9/11) producing a particulate matter (WTC-PM) inhalation disaster. Fire Department of the City of New York (FDNY) rescue/recovery workers experienced markedly different exposure levels based on arrival time. Workers who arrived before noon on 9/11 (High-WTC-exposure) were enveloped in a dense dust cloud with extraordinarily high PM2.5 concentrations in the mg/m3 range [1]. The intensity of this exposure overwhelmed normal upper-airway filtration mechanisms, allowing highly inflammatory super-coarse particles to penetrate the lower airways [2]. The dust was highly alkaline (pH 9.0–11.0) causing acute chemical injury to aerodigestive mucosa [3]. Those arriving after day 3 were intermittently but chronically exposed to resuspended WTC-PM. The combination of early arrival and prolonged exposure during rescue/recovery put workers at highest risk for non-resolving upper airway inflammation [4]. Initially adequate respiratory protection was rarely worn enhancing WTC-PM dust exposure exacerbating respiratory symptoms [5].
The FDNY WTC-medical monitoring program performed physical exams approximately every 12–18 months. Exams included spirometry, height, and weight. Because of ongoing medical treatment for WTC-related illnesses, there has been minimal longitudinal drop out [6–8]. Exposure and outcome metrics recorded by the FDNY WTC Health Program provide a rich longitudinal dataset ideal for investigating the pathophysiology of WTC-related lung injury. High-WTC-exposure increased the risk of lower respiratory tract injury [9] with incident asthma, COPD, and asthma-COPD overlap [10, 11] and cardiovascular diseases [12, 13]. Cardiometabolic risk factors, particularly body mass index (BMI), are well defined risk-factors for WTC related lung injury defined as incident FEV1 below the lower limit of normal [14].
As the cohort has aged, mortality risk factors have become a research focus. We have observed that both lower cross-sectional FEV1 and steeper FEV1-decline are mortality risk factors in this cohort [15, 16]. Recently, we reported visit-to-visit-FEV1 variation (FEV1-variation) is another FEV1 related mortality risk-factor [17]. We further observed that high WTC exposure and components of metabolic syndrome, including high baseline BMI, were associated with increased odds of high (top quartile) FEV1-variation. In the current investigation, we test whether FEV1 variation changes with increasing time since WTC exposure. We hypothesize that worsened-FEV1-variation over time since 9/11 will be associated with BMI and weight variation and will represent an additional mortality risk factor.
Methods
Study population
The source population consisted of 11,474 WTC exposed FDNY rescue/recovery workers [17]. WTC exposed workers received medical monitoring examinations every 12–18 months. Worker signed informed consent; Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine IRB approval (#07-09-320).
Data collection
Data was maintained in the FDNY WTC Health Program Data Center. WTC-monitoring exams include FEV1, weight and height measurements. Mortality data for the FDNY cohort were ascertained through FDNY WTC records (9/12/2001-12/31/2023).
Spirometry
Screening spirometry without bronchodilator was performed according to contemporaneous ATS criteria: only high-quality, grade A/B measurements, were included (7). The cohort completed 113,628 WTC-monitoring exams 9/12/2001-12/31/2018 (12.1 ± 2.2 exams per person) with 111,231 (97.9%) being grade A/B. FEV1 percent predicted values used race neutral GLI Global reference equations [18].
Study design
We conducted a Landmark mortality analysis of WTC-exposed FDNY rescue/recovery workers who were alive 1/1/2019 (Fig. 1), providing common start and equal follow-up times to reduce immortal time bias [19]. To assess FEV1-variability trajectory, exposure was divided into two prespecified 9-year intervals; early (9/12/2001–12/31/2009) and later (1/12010–12/31/2018). Because estimation of within-person variation by linear regression requires more than three measurements, the analytic cohort of N = 9410 needed ≥3 FEV1 measurements both early and later. The primary exposure was greater FEV1-variation between early and later 9-year intervals, the outcome was 5-year all-cause mortality 1/1/2019-12/31/2023 (Fig. 1). Secondary exposures were landmark-BMI and longitudinal weight-variation (2001–2018). Covariates were landmark-FEV1. Prespecified confounders were smoking (ever/never) and landmark-age. The study followed STROBE guidelines.
Fig. 1.
Landmark analysis study design. A 1/1/2019 landmark analysis of N = 9410 workers who were alive 12/31/2018 provided common start and equal follow-up times to reduce immortal time bias. Early/later FEV1-variation change was the exposure and 5-year post-1/1/2019 mortality the outcome. Early-Interval FEV1-variation was derived from N = 47,410 FEV1 measurements (5.0 ± 1.4 per person). Later-Interval FEV1-variation was derived from N = 63,784 FEV1 measurements (6.4 ± 1.7 per person)
Statistical analysis
Visit-to-visit variation has been defined by both coefficient of variation (CV) and standard error of the slope (slope-SEM) derived from linear regression [17, 20–22]. We calculated both FEV1-CV and FEV1-slope-SEM. Doubling of FEV1-variation was used because log2 transformation improved FEV1variation kurtosis (61.2 ± 0.05 to 5.8 ± 0.05 for FEV1-slope-SEM and 11.5 ± 0.05 to 1.4 ± 0.05 for FEV1-CV). Categorical Worsened-FEV1-variation was defined as ratio > 1 of later-FEV1-variation/early-FEV1-variation. Continuous FEV1-variation change was defined as log2 of the later-FEV1-variation/early-FEV1-variation ratio. Logistic regression assessed worker characteristics associated with worsened-FEV1-variation. The association between worsened-FEV1-variation and all-cause mortality was modeled using Cox regression with equal person-time at risk for all study participants. There were no interactions between worsened-FEV1-variation and age (p = 0.48) or weight variation (p = 0.98) but there was interaction between continuous worsening-FEV1-variation and ICS/LABA treatment (p = 0.029).
Five sensitivity analyses evaluated the robustness of the association between worsened-FEV1-variation and mortality: (1) Modeling FEV1-variation as defined by either FEV1-CV or FEV1-slope-SEM. (2) Assessing worsened-FEV1-variation in subgroup (N = 6434) without known pulmonary abnormalities. (3) Assessing worsened-FEV1-variation in subgroup (N = 2935) with need for ICS/LABA treatment, having accelerated-FEV1-decline or landmark FEV1<80%. (4) Assessing worsening-FEV1-variation as a continuous exposure. (5) Evaluating exposure dose response by categorizing FEV1-variation into tertiles of FEV1-CV or FEV1 Slope-SEM. Data analysis was performed using SPSS.v30 and Prism.v10.
Results
Cohort characteristics and FEV1-variation
The analytic cohort N = 9410 suffered 207 deaths over 46,487 person years yielding 4.45 deaths/1000 person years (Fig. 1). There were 111,231 FEV1 measurements (11.8 ± 2.2 measurements per person) 9/12/2001–12/31/2018.
Mean FEV1-variation was 5.87 ± 3.80 CV% in the early interval and 5.51 ± 3.22 CV% in the later interval, corresponding to a mean decrease in variation (improvement) between the two intervals of 0.36 ± 4.4 CV% (paired t test). Between 10th -90th percentile, early-to-later changes in FEV1-variation ranged from a 4.85 CV% decrease (improvement) to a 3.96 CV% increase (worsened), an 8.8 CV% interdecile range. FEV1-CV was not associated with FEV1 measurements per person (β = 0.009 ± 0.016% per FEV1 measurement p = 0.55).
We categorized individuals according to change in FEV1-variation: 4459 (47.4%) demonstrated worsened-variation and 4951 (52.6%) improvement (Table 1). Workers with worsened-FEV1-variation experienced 122 post-landmark deaths (2.73%, 5.5/1000 person-years) while workers with improved-FEV1-variation experienced 85 post-landmark deaths (1.73%, 3.5/1000 person-years) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Characteristics of workers in Worsened- and Improve- FEV1-variation strata
| Variable | FEV1-variation Strata | Unadjusted difference or (95% CI)* | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Worsened ¶ N = 4459 (47.4%) |
Improved N = 4951 (52.6%) |
||
| Longitudinal FEV1-variation | |||
| Early FEV1-variation ml/year ∥ | 4.08 ± 2.05 | 7.48 ± 4.27 | − 3.39 (− 3.53, − 3.26) |
| Later FEV1-variation ml/year†† | 6.82 ± 3.71 | 4.33 ± 2.08 | 2.49 (2.36, 2.61) |
| Later minus early FEV1-variation | 2.73 ± 3.07 | − 3.15 ± 3.50 | 5.88 (5.75, 6.01) |
| Demographics | |||
| Age on 9/11/2001 | 39.0 ± 7.6 | 38.6 ± 7.6 | 0.40 (0.095, 0.71) |
| Ever smoker** | 1572 (35.2%) | 1682 (33.9%) | 1.2 (− 0.6, 3.2) |
| First post 9/11 -BMI §<30 | 2840 (63.7%) | 3401 (68.7%) | Reference |
| First post 9/11 -BMI ≥ 30, < 35 | 1293 (29%) | 1275 (25.8%) | 1.21 (1.11,1.33) |
| First post 9/11 BMI ≥ 35 | 324 (7.3%) | 274 (5.5%) | 1.42 (1.20,1.68) |
| First post 9/11 BMI kg/m2 | 29.3 ± 4.0 | 28.7 ± 3.7 | 0.56 (0.41, 0.72) |
| BMI kg/m2 Closest to 1/1/2019 | 30.9 ± 5.1 | 30.1 ± 4.6 | 0.78 (0.58, 0.98) |
| Weight-slope lbs/year† | 0.61 ± 1.4 | 0.52 ± 1.3 | 0.083 (0.028,0.14) |
| Weight-variation CV%‡ | 4.55 ± 2.56 | 4.35 ± 2.32 | 0.20 (0.10, 0.30) |
| FEV1 related risk-factors | |||
| First post 9/11 FEV1%predicted | 99.8 ± 13.1 | 103.3 ± 15.6 | − 3.5(− 4.0,− 2.9) |
| FEV1-slope ml/year 2001–2018 | − 37.0 ± 22.0 | − 32.9 ± 23.5 | − 4.1 (− 5.1, − 3.2) |
| First post 9/11 FEV1/FVC < 70% | 105 (2.3%) | 116 (2.3%) | 0.00 (− 0.01,0.01) |
| FEV1% Closest to 1/1/2019 | 95.7 ± 15.4 | 99.7 ± 14.8 | − 4.0 (− 4.6, − 3.4) |
| Mortality | |||
| Alive 12/31/2018 | 4337 (97.3%) | 4866 (98.3%) | Reference |
| Died 1/1/2019-12/31/2023 | 122 (2.73%) | 85 (1.73%) | OR = 1.61 (1.22, 2.13) |
| Mortality Rate/1000-person years* | 5.5 | 3.5 | RR = 1.61 (1.22, 2.13) |
¶Worsened-FEV1-variation as a categorical variable was defined as ratio > 1 of later-FEV1-variation/early-FEV1-variation. ∥ Forced expiratory volumes at one second variation in the interval 9/12/2001-12/31/2009 †† Forced expiratory volumes at one second variation of the interval 1/1/2010-12/31/2018 *Unadjusted odds or rate ratio > 1 represents greater risk with Worsened-FEV1-variation. †Weight change (mean time effect on weight) and ‡Weight-variation (standard error of the mean time effect). ** Reported current or former smoking on any of the 113,606 medical monitoring exams 9/12/2001–1/1/2019. § Body Mass Index kg/m2
Despite having lower (better) FEV1-variation in the early interval, the worsened-FEV1-variation stratum had delayed FEV1-variation increase. Early, FEV1-variation was 3.39 CV% lower in the worsened-FEV1-variation stratum than in the improved-FEV1-variation stratum (95% CI = − 3.53 to − 3.26). The worsened stratum suffered a delayed increase from early to the later (Δ = 2.73 ± 3.07 CV% 95% CI = 2.64–2.82) (Table 1). Later, FEV1-variation was 2.49 CV% higher in the worsened-FEV1-variation stratum than in the improved-FEV1-variation stratum (95% CI = 2.36–2.61).
First-post-9/11 (baseline) characteristics associated with worsened-FEV1-variation.
We next assessed the association of worsened-FEV1-variation with first post-9/11 risk factors. Compared with workers whose FEV1-variation improved, workers suffering worsened-FEV1-variation were slightly older (0.40 years 95% CI = 0.10–0.71) and had higher baseline-BMI and Landmark-BMI (0.56 kg/m2, 95% CI = 0.41–0.72; and 0.78 kg/m2 95% CI = 0.58–0.98; respectively). Compared with workers with BMI < 30, workers with BMI ≥ 30, BMI ≤ 35 had 21% greater odds of worsened-FEV1-variation (95% CI = 1.11–1.33) and workers with BMI > 35 had 42% higher odds of worsened-FEV1-variation (95% CI = 1.20–1.68). Workers with worsened-FEV1-variation had lower baseline FEV1 (− 3.5% predicted lower; 95% CI=− 4.0 to − 2.9), but the prevalence of baseline FEV1/FVC ratio < 70% was not different.
Worsened-FEV1-variation predictors: multivariable models.
Adjusted logistic regression showed similar results as crude odds ratios (Fig. 2). Each 10-year increase in age was associated with 8% higher odds of worsened-FEV1-variation (95% CI = 1.02–1.14) and each 10% predicted lower baseline FEV1 was associated with 18% higher odds of worsened-FEV1-variation (95% CI = 1.14–1.21). Each 5 kg/m2 increase in baseline BMI is associated with18% higher odds of worsened-FEV1-variation (95% CI = 1.12–1.24).
Fig. 2.
Two multivariable logistic regressions with worsened-FEV1-variation as the outcome. Upper three rows, cross-sectional variables. Older age at study entry, lower first-post-9/11-FEV1 and greater first-post-9/11-BMI are associated with increased odds of worsened-FEV1-variation (OR 1.08 per 10 years; 95% CI 1.02–1.14, OR 1.18 per 10% predicted decline, 95% CI 1.14–1.21, OR 1.18 per 5 kg/m2; 95% CI 1.12–1.24, respectively). Lower two rows show an independent model with longitudinal variables. Visit-to-visit weight-variation is associated with increased odds of worsened-FEV1-variation but weight change is not associated with worsened-FEV1-variation (OR = 1.17 per 5 CV%; 95% CI = 1.07–1.27 and OR1.03 lbs/year; 95% CI 0.99–1.06, respectively)
We next evaluated if longitudinal risk factors were associated with worsened-FEV1-variation. The interdecile range for FEV1-slope was from − 66.3 to − 8.2 ml/year; weight-variation ranged 2.12–7.49 CV% and weight-change ranged from 0.92 lbs./year weight loss to 2.30 lbs./year weight gain. Compared to improved-FEV1-variation, worsened-FEV1-variation had greater weight-variation (Δ = 0.20 CV%; 95% CI = 0.10–0.30) and more weight gain (Δ = 0.083 lbs/year; 95% CI = 0.028–0.14) (Table 1). Each 5 CV% increase in weight-variation was associated with 17% higher odds of worsened-FEV1-variation (95% CI = 1.07–1.27) but weight gain (Fig. 2 bottom rows) was not significantly associated with the odds of worsened-FEV1-variation (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.99–1.06). In linear regression, each 5% increase in weight-CV was associated with a 0.47 ± 0.93%, p < 0.001 increase of longitudinal FEV1-CV change .
FEV1-variation trajectory and mortality hazard.
Like the unadjusted rate ratio (RR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.22–2.13 Table 1), a crude Cox model demonstrated 60% higher mortality hazard associated with Worsened-FEV1-variation ( 95% CI = 1.21–2.11 Fig. 3A), Worsened-FEV1-CV increased 5-year mortality hazard 40% (95% CI = 1.07–1.89) and Worsened-FEV1-slope-SEM increased 5-year mortality hazard 39% (95% CI = 1.05–1.83 Fig. 3A bottom row) in separate fully adjusted cox models.
Fig. 3.
Mortality hazard of longitudinal change in FEV1-visit-to-visit variation. Panel A Top row, the categorical variable Worsened-FEV1-CV as time post 9/11 increases is a mortality risk-factor (HR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.07–1.89). Bottom row, Worsened-FEV1-slope-SEM is also a mortality risk factor (HR = 1.39; 95% CI 1.05–1.83) when substituted for Worsened-FEV1-CV in an independent cox model. Both cox models adjusted for cross-sectional FEV1 per 10% predicted decrement closest to but before 1/1/2019, longitudinal weight variation, smoking, and age. Panel B The continuous variable Worsening-FEV1-CV (log2 ratio late/early FEV1-variation) is a mortality risk-factor (HR = 1.29; 95% CI 1.07–1.55 per doubling of early/late ratio) in a restricted subgroup (N = 6434) without lung function abnormalities. This subgroup excluded participants with asthma and/or COPD, accelerated-FEV1-decline, vital capacity < 80% predicted closest to but preceding the 1/1/2019 landmark. Panel C Worsening-FEV1-CV is not mortality risk-factor (HR = 0.97; 95% CI 0.82–1.16) in a restricted subgroup (N = 2935) enriched of lung function abnormities. The subgroup only included participants with asthma or COPD or accelerated-FEV1-decline or vital capacity < 80% predicted closest to but preceding the 1/1/2019 landmark
Findings were consistent across all sensitivity analyses Fig. 3B and C. To test if FEV1-variation is a mortality risk factor in workers without lung function abnormalities we developed a restricted subgroup (N = 6434 Fig. 3B) that excluded workers treated for Asthma/COPD with ICS/LABA for 2 or more years (N = 1854), workers with accelerated-FEV1-decline (N = 1164) and workers with landmark FVC < 80% (N = 1406). In this restricted subgroup, FEV1-variation as a continuous variable is a mortality risk factor (HR = 1.29 per CV doubling; 95% CI = 1.07–1.55). Surprisingly FEV1-variation was not a mortality risk factor (HR = 0.97 95% CI = 0.82–1.16) in the subgroup (N = 2935 Fig. 3C) enriched for lung function abnormalities.
We observed a trend toward interaction between worsened FEV1-variation and early ICS/LABA treatment (p = 0.098), and a significant interaction when worsening-FEV1-variation was modeled continuously (p = 0.029), suggesting effect modification of the association between improved-FEV1-variation and mortality by ICS/LABA treatment. To determine whether effect modification was a direct ICS/LABA treatment effect, we performed multivariable logistic regression and found no association between early ICS/LABA treatment and improved-FEV1-variation (OR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.80–1.04; p = 0.165) after adjustment for age, smoking status, BMI, first post-9/11-FEV1, and early FEV1-slope suggesting ICS/LABA does not appear to directly improve the variation phenotype.
To better characterize the dose–response relationship between change in FEV1 variation and mortality, we categorized change in both FEV1-CV and FEV1 slope-SEM into tertiles representing worsened, stable, and improved variation. Mean (SD) %CV visit-to-visit-FEV1-variation increased 3.68 ± 3.23% in the worsened stratum, decreased 0.20 ± 0.73% in the stable stratum, and decreased 4.55 ± 3.74% in the improved stratum. Compared with stable FEV1-CV (Fig. 4A), worsened FEV1-CV was associated with a 49% increased mortality hazard (HR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.06–2.09; p = 0.021), whereas improved FEV1-CV was not associated with mortality (HR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.79–1.65; p = 0.472). Similarly, when visit-to-visit-FEV1-variation was defined by SEM-slope, variation increased 17.7 ± 24.8 mL/year in the worsened stratum, declined 6.4 ± 4.4 mL/year in the stable stratum, and declined 37.7 ± 30.9 mL/year in the improved stratum. Compared with stable FEV1 slope-SEM (Fig. 4B), worsened FEV1 slope-SEM was associated with a 50% increased mortality hazard (HR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.08–2.09; p = 0.016), whereas improved FEV1 slope-SEM was not associated with mortality (HR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.72–1.47; p = 0.869).
Fig. 4.
Mortality hazard of longitudinal change in categorical tertials (1) Improved (Green). (2) Stable (Blue) and (3) Worsened FEV1-visit-to-visit variation (Red). Panel A Compared to stable-CV, worsened-CV had a 49% increased mortality (HR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.06–2.09 p = 0.021) but improved FEV1-CV was not significantly different from stable-FEV1-CV (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.79–1.65 p = 0.472) Panel B Compared to stable FEV1-slope SEM worsened FEV1-slope-SEM has a 50% increased mortality (HR = 1.50 95% CI = 1.08–2.09 p = 0.016) but improved FEV1-slope-SEM was not significantly different from stable-FEV1-slope-SEM (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.72–1.47, p = 0.869)
Discussion
The trajectory of visit-to-visit FEV1-variation (FEV1-variation) over time following WTC exposure was heterogeneous. Approximately half of WTC-exposed FDNY workers experienced worsened-FEV1-variation, defined by increased variation from the pre-January 1, 2010 to post-January 1, 2010 exposure windows. Pulmonary function instability emerging nine years after WTC exposure was associated with increased mortality risk and co-occurred with baseline obesity, greater visit-to-visit weight-variation (weight-variation), and steeper FEV1 decline. Despite their collinearity, worsened-FEV1-variation, weight-variation, and landmark adiposity remained independent predictors of mortality. The heterogeneity of the trajectory of FEV1-variation parallels the heterogeneity of trajectory of respiratory symptoms after initiation of ICS/LABA treatment for asthma and or COPD [23, 24]. Multi-system instability, reflected by increased FEV1-variation, adiposity, and weight-variation, may reduce physiologic reserve, and increase vulnerability to adverse health outcomes, including higher all-cause mortality. Further research is needed to determine whether instability in other treatable metabolic syndrome trait(s) are also associated with worsened-FEV1-variation.
The association between FEV1-variation and mortality is robust. In prior work we measured FEV1 variation using a model-based estimate of FEV1-slope standard error of the mean (FEV1-slope-SEM) [17], whereas this study used coefficient of variation, a common measure of visit-to-visit fluctuation in cardio-metabolic risk factors [20, 21, 22], as the primary exposure and FEV1-slope-SEM in sensitivity analysis. Each definition of visit-to-visit variation has advantages and disadvantages. FEV1-CV does not use the number of FEV1 measurements in its derivation but does not separate variation due to individuals’ average FEV1-slope from visit-to visit-variation. FEV1-slope-SEM explicitly separates variation due to longitudinal decline in FEV1 from visit-to-visit variation around the average but uses the number of FEV1 measurements per person in its derivation so can be biased by differences in the number of longitudinal FEV1 measurements per person. The association of worsened-FEV1-variation with mortality is replicated using both FEV1-CV and FEV1-slope-SEM definitions of FEV1-variation. In a sensitivity analysis excluding workers with asthma and or COPD [23, 24], accelerated-FEV1-decline [10, 16] and low vital capacity (FVC < 80% predicted), we observed worsened-FEV1-variation remained significantly associated with mortality.
In a second sensitivity analysis of workers enriched for pulmonary abnormalities, worsened-FEV1-variation was not significantly associated with mortality. We observed the association between worsened FEV1 variation and mortality was absent among ICS/LABA treated workers but remained significant in ICS/LABA untreated workers, demonstrating effect modification. However, ICS/LABA therapy was not associated with improvement in FEV1 variation in multivariable logistic regression using improved FEV1-variation as the outcome. These findings do not support a simple mechanism in which ICS/LABA reduces mortality through improvement in FEV1 variation. Absence, in this cohort, of an association between worsened-FEV1-variation and mortality in asthma and/or COPD patients requiring prolonged ICS/LABA treatment argues against these diseases being the predominant explanation for the association between worsened-FEV1-variation and mortality. Further research is needed to determine whether the observed effect modification reflects a direct treatment effect or residual confounding by indication, whereby ICS/LABA treatment identifies a subgroup with underlying immunologic or clinical characteristics associated with both treatment initiation and reduced mortality risk.
We also investigated the dose response to change in FEV1-variation dividing the cohort into worsened, stable, and improved strata. Compared to stable-FEV1-variation over time, worsened-FEV1-variation has significantly greater mortality in both FEV1-slope-SEM and FEV1-CV definitions of FEV1-variation. There is, however, no difference in mortality between stable and improved-FEV1-variation stratum demonstrating the most severely impacted 33% is driving the mortality risk. Although continuous exposures often provide greater statistical efficiency, this was not observed in our analyses. For both the CV and slope-SEM definitions, continuous worsening in FEV1 variation showed lower precision and weaker mortality discrimination than the dichotomous definition. These findings suggest that the relationship between worsening-FEV1-variation and mortality may not be linear across the full distribution of FEV1-variation change. This pattern is consistent with a threshold effect and may explain why the dichotomous exposure demonstrated greater precision than the continuous exposure.
Worsened-FEV1-variation could reflect progressive airway instability driven by recurrent systemic inflammation associated with metabolic syndrome [25, 26]. To test this possibility, we assessed the association of worsened-FEV1-variation with both early obesity and with longitudinal weight-variation [22]. Both baseline obesity and greater longitudinal weight-variation were associated with greater odds of worsened-FEV1-variation. Despite being correlated, worsened-FEV1-variation and longitudinal weight-variation do not interact and remain significant mortality risk-factors when combined in a fully adjusted cox mortality model. Pulmonary and metabolic instability each carry prognostic information beyond their shared correlation. The associations between worsened-FEV1-variation, greater adiposity, and increased 5-year all-cause mortality suggests that rising FEV1-variation reflects underlying multisystem pathophysiologic processes that increase susceptibility to death. Further research is needed to test if additional components of metabolic syndrome are risk-factors for worsened-FEV1-variation.
This analysis has limitations. Requiring three spirometries in two 9-year exposure windows likely introduced survivor bias but this is a healthy worker cohort with low mortality from 9/12/2001 to the landmark date [15, 16]. Unmeasured confounders associated with both worsened-FEV1-variation and mortality may bias mortality models. The categorical exposure worsened-FEV1-variation is necessarily arbitrary, but the continuous exposure of later FEV1-variation is also a mortality risk suggesting little information is lost by stratification. Finally, given the unique nature of WTC-exposure in this healthy worker cohort, these observations require replication in independent occupational, community and disease specific cohorts.
In conclusion, FEV1-variation is an understudied mortality risk-factor reflecting biologically important end-organ instability analogous to blood-pressure and/or weight-variation [20–22]. We interpret FEV1 variation not as measurement noise but as a physiologic signal reflecting instability of pulmonary function, analogous to variability in blood pressure or body weight. Measures of longitudinal risk-factor instability contribute prognostic information beyond what is contained in cross-sectional and risk factor-slope measurements. An integrated systems approach that explicitly models risk-factor variability as an exposure may improve risk stratification in longitudinal cohorts. Regular assessment of FEV1-variability may identify workers at increased risk, allowing early interventions to limit disease progression and improve health outcomes. Further research with analytic approaches capable of incorporating time-dependent covariates like BMI is needed [27]. Replication of this analysis in other cohorts is required to better understand longitudinal change in FEV1-variation as a mortality risk-factor [28–31].
Author contributions
MDW, MW, HWC, DGG, LL and DJP conceived the research strategy. MW, AV and MDW performed data analysis. MW, MDW, AV and LL wrote the manuscript. DGG HWC DP edited the manuscript.
Funding
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health grants R21OH012256 to DGG, MDW 1R21OH012958-01 TO MDW and DGG contracts 200-2017-93326, 200-2017-93426, 75D301-22-R-72,142, and 75D301-22-R-72,244 to DJP Programme of VLUHR to MHW.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study may be available upon request to , David J. Prezant.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Lippmann M, Cohen MD, Chen LC (2015) Health effects of World Trade Center (WTC) dust: an unprecedented disaster’s inadequate risk management. Crit Rev Toxicol 45(6):492–530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fireman EM, Lerman Y, Ganor E, Greif J, Fireman-Shoresh S, Lioy PJ, Banauch GI, Weiden M, Kelly KJ, Prezant DJ (2004) Induced sputum assessment in New York City firefighters exposed to World Trade Center dust. Environ Health Perspect 112(15):1564–1569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lioy PJ, Weisel CP, Millette JR, Eisenreich S, Vallero D, Offenberg J, Buckley B, Turpin B, Zhong M, Cohen MD, Prophete C, Yang I, Stiles R, Chee G, Johnson W, Porcja R, Alimokhtari S, Hale RC, Weschler C, Chen LC (2002) Characterization of the dust/smoke aerosol that settled east of the World Trade Center (WTC) in lower Manhattan after the collapse of the WTC 11 September 2001. Environ Health Perspect 110(7):703–714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Putman B, Zeig-Owens R, Singh A, Hall CB, Schwartz T, Webber MP, Cohen HW, Prezant DJ, Bachert C, Weiden MD (2018) Risk factors for post-9/11 chronic rhinosinusitis in Fire Department of the City of New York workers. Occup Environ Med 75(12):884–889 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Feldman DM, Baron SL, Bernard BP, Lushniak BD, Banauch G, Arcentales N et al (2004) Symptoms, respirator use, and pulmonary function changes among New York City firefighters responding to the World Trade Center disaster. Chest 125(4):1256–1264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Banauch GI, Hall C, Weiden M, Cohen HW, Aldrich TK, Christodoulou V, Arcentales N, Kelly KJ, Prezant DJ (2006) Pulmonary function after exposure to the World Trade Center collapse in the New York City Fire Department. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 174(3):312–319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Aldrich TK, Gustave J, Hall CB, Cohen HW, Webber MP, Zeig-Owens R, Cosenza K, Christodoulou V, Glass L, Al-Othman F, Weiden MD, Kelly KJ, Prezant DJ (2010) Lung function in rescue workers at the World Trade Center after 7 years. N Engl J Med 362(14):1263–1272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Niles JK, Webber MP, Cohen HW, Hall CB, Zeig-Owens R, Ye F, Glaser MS, Weakley J, Weiden MD, Aldrich TK, Nolan A, Glass L, Kelly KJ, Prezant DJ (2013) The respiratory pyramid: From symptoms to disease in World Trade Center exposed firefighters. Am J Ind Med 56(8):870–880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weiden MD, Ferrier N, Nolan A, Rom WN, Comfort A, Gustave J et al (2010) Obstructive airways disease with air trapping among firefighters exposed to world trade center dust. Chest 137(3):566–574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zeig-Owens R, Singh A, Aldrich TK, Hall CB, Schwartz T, Webber MP et al (2018) Blood leukocyte concentrations, FEV 1 decline, and airflow limitation A 15-year longitudinal study of world trade center-exposed firefighters. Ann Am Thorac Soc 15(2):173–183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Singh A, Liu C, Putman B, Zeig-Owens R, Hall CB, Schwartz T et al (2018) Predictors of asthma/COPD overlap in FDNY firefighters with world trade center dust exposure: a longitudinal study. Chest 154(6):1301–1310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cohen HW, Zeig-Owens R, Joe C, Hall CB, Webber MP, Weiden MD, Cleven KL, Jaber N, Skerker M, Yip J, Schwartz T, Prezant DJ (2019) Long-term cardiovascular disease risk among firefighters after the world trade center disaster. JAMA Netw Open 2(9):e199775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sloan NL, Shapiro MZ, Sabra A, Dasaro CR, Crane MA, Harrison DJ et al (2021) Cardiovascular disease in the World Trade Center Health Program General Responder Cohort. Am J Ind Med 64(2):97–107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Weiden MD, Naveed B, Kwon S, Cho SJ, Comfort AL, Prezant DJ, Rom WN, Nolan A (2013) Cardiovascular biomarkers predict susceptibility to lung injury in World Trade Center dust-exposed firefighters. Eur Respir J 41(5):1023–1030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cannon MF, Goldfarb DG, Zeig-Owens RA, Hall CB, Choi J, Cohen HW et al (2024) Normal lung function and mortality in world trade center responders and national health and nutrition examination survey III participants. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 209(10):1229–1237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Goldfarb DG, Hall CB, Choi J, Zeig-Owens R, Cohen HW, Cannon M, Prezant DJ, Weiden MD (2023) Association of lung function decline with all-cause and cancer-cause mortality after world trade center dust exposure. Ann Am Thorac Soc 20(8):1136–1143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Deforce KR, Lahousse L, Goldfarb DG, Prezant DJ, Weiden MD (2025) Visit-to-visit FEV1 variation and mortality in New York City fire department rescue and recovery workers exposed to world trade center collapse-related dust. Ann Am Thorac Soc 22(9):1343–1350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bowerman C, Bhakta NR, Brazzale D, Cooper BR, Cooper J, Gochicoa-Rangel L et al (2023) A race-neutral approach to the interpretation of lung function measurements. Am J Respir Crit Care Med Am J Respir Crit Care Med 207(6):768–774 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mi X, Hammill BG, Curtis LH, Lai EC, Setoguchi S (2016) Use of the landmark method to address immortal person-time bias in comparative effectiveness research: a simulation study. Stat Med 35(26):4824–4836. 10.1002/sim.7019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Muntner P, Shimbo D, Tonelli M, Reynolds K, Arnett DK, Oparil S (2011) The relationship between visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure and all-cause mortality in the general population: findings from NHANES III, 1988 to 1994. Hypertension 57(2):160–166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dai L, Song L, Li X, Yang Y, Zheng X, Wu Y et al (2018) Association of visit-to-visit blood pressure variation with the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in general population. J Clin Hypertens 20(2):280–288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Almuwaqqat Z, Hui Q, Liu C, Zhou JJ, Voight BF, Ho YL et al (2024) Long-term body mass index variability and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. JAMA Netw Open 7(3):e243062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Putman B, Lahousse L, Goldfarb DG, Zeig-Owens R, Schwartz T, Singh A, Vaeth B, Hall CB, Lancet EA, Webber MP, Cohen HW, Prezant DJ, Weiden MD (2020) Factors predicting treatment of world trade center-related lung injury: a longitudinal cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(23):9056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Putman B, Lahousse L, Singh A, Zeig-Owens R, Hall CB, Fazzari MJ, Schwartz T, Webber MP, Cohen HW, Prezant DJ, Weiden MD (2020) Dyspnea and inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting β-agonist therapy in an occupational cohort: a longitudinal study. Ann Am Thorac Soc 17(6):770–773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kwon S, Crowley G, Caraher EJ, Haider SH, Lam R, Veerappan A, Yang L, Liu M, Zeig-Owens R, Schwartz TM, Prezant DJ, Nolan A (2019) Validation of predictive metabolic syndrome biomarkers of world trade center lung injury: a 16-year longitudinal study. Chest 156(3):486–496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kwon S, Lee M, Crowley G, Schwartz T, Zeig-Owens R, Prezant DJ, Liu M, Nolan A (2021) Dynamic metabolic risk profiling of world trade center lung disease: a longitudinal cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 204(9):1035–1047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee M, Troxel AB, Kwon S, Crowley G, Schwartz T, Zeig-Owens R et al (2024) Partial-linear single-index Cox regression models with multiple time-dependent covariates. BMC Med Res Methodol 24(1):311. 10.1186/s12874-024-02434-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Skloot GS, Schechter CB, Herbert R, Moline JM, Levin SM (2009) Longitudinal assessment of spirometry in the World Trade Center medical monitoring program. Chest 135(2):492–498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Udasin I, Schechter C, Crowley L, Sotolongo A, Gochfeld M, Luft B et al (2011) Respiratory symptoms were associated with lower spirometry results during the first examination of WTC responders. J Occup Environ Med 53(1):49–54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Clouston SAP, Edelman NH, Aviv A, Stewart C, Luft BJ (2019) Shortened leukocyte telomere length is associated with reduced pulmonary function and greater subsequent decline in function in a sample of World Trade Center responders. Sci Rep 9(1):8148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Choi J, Hall CB, Clouston SAP, Cleven KL, Mann FD, Luft BJ, Zammit AR (2024) Cross-sectional association between posttraumatic stress and cognition is moderated by pulmonary functioning in world trade center responders. Am J Ind Med 67(9):823–833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study may be available upon request to , David J. Prezant.




