Skip to main content
Gland Surgery logoLink to Gland Surgery
editorial
. 2026 May 25;15(5):111. doi: 10.21037/gs-2026-1-0103

Omission of axillary dissection in patients with microscopic residual nodal disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Masakuni Noguchi 1,2,✉, Masafumi Inokuchi 1,2, Emi Morioka 1,2, Yusuke Haba 1,2
PMCID: PMC13264721  PMID: 42299279

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is associated postoperatively with arm lymphedema, reduced shoulder mobility and local sensory dysfunction. Currently, tailored axillary surgery (TAS) and axillary reverse mapping have been developed to avoid arm lymphedema without increasing the risk of axillary recurrence (1-4). TAS involves removal of the clipped node(s), sentinel node(s) and any palpably abnormal nodes. TAS aims to convert a clinically node-positive axilla (cN+) into a clinically node-negative one (cN0), mainly through palpation-guided selective removal of grossly involved nodes (4). When a cN+ becomes cN0 after TAS, nodal irradiation is effective in reducing the axillary recurrence rate (1,2). A prospective randomized trial (TAXIS trial) comparing TAS in combination with axillary radiotherapy versus conventional ALND is being conducted in both the neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) and upfront surgery settings (1). An analysis of the primary endpoint will be published in 2030 (2). The MicroNAC study may support the rationale of the ongoing TAXIS trial using TAS (1,2), though the surgical procedures are somewhat different between them.

A multicenter retrospective cohort study (MicroNAC study) was conducted to assess oncologic outcomes in breast cancer patients with residual micrometastatic nodal disease (ypN1mi) treated with or without conventional ALND after NAST (5). This study required down-staging to cN0 after NAST for cN+ patients. Residual micrometastases after NAST were histologically determined on frozen or paraffin sections obtained through either targeted axillary dissection (TAD), sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy or the MARI (Marking Axillary lymph nodes with Radioactive Iodine seeds) procedure. Results of the study can be summarized as follows: A total of 1,585 patients with ypN1mi disease were analyzed, of whom 804 patients (50.7%) underwent conventional ALND and 781 patients (49.3%) did not. Of the 804 patients who underwent ALND, additional positive nodes were found in 245 patients (30.5%) after NAST, including 123 patients with micrometastases and 102 patients with macrometastases. After surgery, regional radiotherapy was administered to 81.1% of patients who underwent ALND and to 78.7% of patients who did not. Additionally, adjuvant hormonal therapy was administered to 95.8% of patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors who underwent ALND and to 95.9% of patients with HR-positive tumors who did not undergo ALND.

With the median follow-up of 3.1 years, the overall rate of any axillary recurrence was only 2.0% in this study. Although current breast cancer guidelines have recommended completion ALND for all patients with residual micrometastases or macrometastases after NAST (6,7), the rate of axillary recurrence was not significantly different between patients treated with ALND and those without ALND in this study (1.7% vs. 2.3%; P=0.92). As shown in the landmark National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-04 trial, postoperative radiotherapy is effective in preventing axillary recurrence in cN0 patients (8). When examined by tumor subtypes, on the other hand, patients with triple-negative tumors who did not undergo ALND had significantly higher rates of axillary recurrence than those treated with ALND (8.7% vs. 2.4%, P=0.018). On multivariable analysis, omission of postoperative radiotherapy and triple-negative tumors, but not omission of ALND, were independently associated with an increased risk of axillary recurrence (5).

In contrast to triple-negative tumors, completion ALND was not detrimental for patients with HR-positive tumors or HER2-positive tumors who received appropriate adjuvant systemic therapies after surgery. NAST is highly effective in patients with HER2-positive tumors or in those with triple-negative tumors, achieving nodal pathologic complete response (pCR) in 44–78% of cases (9,10). In contrast, nodal pCR after NAST occurs in only approximately 20% of patients with HR-positive tumors (11,12). Nevertheless, Montagna et al. (5) reported that regional recurrence was rare in patients with HR-positive tumors treated with either SLN biopsy alone or ALND; however, most axillary recurrences occur within the first 5 years after surgery (13,14). In the ACOSOG Z0011 trial also, 7 of 11 patients (64%) experienced regional recurrences within 5 years, despite more than 80% of patients having HR-positive tumors (13). Only one case of regional recurrence was observed beyond 76 months of follow-up. However, it is well established that HR-positive tumors recur over a longer period of time. In the AMAROS trial, axillary recurrences occurred in 7 of 744 patients (0.9%) treated with ALND and 11 of 681 patients (1.6%) treated with axillary radiotherapy, with three and five isolated axillary recurrences, respectively. In total, eight events were found between 5 and 11 years of follow-up (15).

Even after 5 years of adjuvant hormonal therapy, patients with HR-positive tumors remain at risk of recurrence for at least 20 years after surgery (16). HR-positive tumors are characterized by a prolonged natural history (17). In the International Breast Cancer Study Group trial with 24 years of follow-up, patients with HR-positive tumors had a lower hazard of recurrence than those with HR-negative tumors during the first 5 years. Beyond 5 years, however, the hazard of recurrence was higher in patients with HR-positive tumors than in those with HR-negative tumors (17). Accordingly, long-term follow-up is recommended to confirm the findings of this study.

Of the 804 patients who underwent ALND in this study, additional involved nodes were found in 245 patients (30.5%) after NAST. This proportion is comparable to rates reported in the ACOSOG Z0011 and the AMAROS trials: the rate of additional positive nodes after SLN biopsy was 27.4% in the Z0011 trial (13) and 33% in the AMAROS trial (15). However, most patients who underwent the SLN biopsy did not develop axillary recurrence in either trial (18). These findings may suggest that omission of ALND is possible under multimodal treatment including nodal radiotherapy and hormonal therapy. Recently, the NSABP B51 randomized clinical trial with a median follow-up of 5 years has demonstrated that adjuvant regional nodal irradiation did not decrease the risk of breast cancer recurrence in patients who had negative axillary nodes after NAST (19). Nevertheless, these trials are not comparable, because these comparisons involve fundamentally different patient populations (NAST vs. upfront surgery; ypN1mi vs. ypN0). As the authors noted, moreover, this was a retrospective observational study, and the surgeons decided to omit ALND based on a lower baseline risk and patient preference (5). Nevertheless, omission of ALND in favor of regional radiotherapy is being investigated in a randomized setting (TAXIS trial) (1,2). Results from the TAXIS trial, with a long-term follow-up, are awaited to confirm the safety of this approach. In the era of multimodality therapy, completion ALND removing all axillary disease may not be required in either cN0 or cN+ patients.

Supplementary

The article’s supplementary files as

gs-15-05-111-coif.pdf (253.8KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.21037/gs-2026-1-0103

Acknowledgments

None.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Footnotes

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Gland Surgery. The article has undergone external peer review.

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://gs.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/gs-2026-1-0103/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.Weber WP, Matrai Z, Hayoz S, et al. Tailored axillary surgery in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer: Pre-planned feasibility substudy of TAXIS (OPBC-03, SAKK 23/16, IBCSG 57-18, ABCSG-53, GBG 101). Breast 2021;60:98-110. 10.1016/j.breast.2021.09.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Maggi N, Nussbaumer R, Holzer L, et al. Axillary surgery in node-positive breast cancer. Breast 2022;62 Suppl 1:S50-3. 10.1016/j.breast.2021.08.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Noguchi M, Inokuchi M, Yokoi-Noguchi M, et al. Conservative Axillary Surgery May Prevent Arm Lymphedema without Increasing Axillary Recurrence in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023;15:5353. 10.3390/cancers15225353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Heidinger M, Knauer M, Tausch C, et al. Tailored axillary surgery - A novel concept for clinically node positive breast cancer. Breast 2023;69:281-9. 10.1016/j.breast.2023.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Montagna G, Alvarado M, Myers S, et al. Oncological outcomes with and without axillary lymph node dissection in patients with residual micrometastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OPBC-07/microNAC): an international, retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2026;27:57-67. 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00598-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (Breast Cancer) Version 5. 2025. Available online: https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=1&id=1419 Accessed Jan 25, 2025.
  • 7.Loibl S, André F, Bachelot T, et al. Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2024;35:159-82. 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fisher B, Redmond C, Fisher ER, et al. Ten-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing radical mastectomy and total mastectomy with or without radiation. N Engl J Med 1985;312:674-81. 10.1056/NEJM198503143121102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Montagna G, Mamtani A, Knezevic A, et al. Selecting Node-Positive Patients for Axillary Downstaging with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2020;27:4515-22. 10.1245/s10434-020-08650-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Boughey JC, McCall LM, Ballman KV, et al. Tumor biology correlates with rates of breast-conserving surgery and pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: findings from the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial. Ann Surg 2014;260:608-14; discussion 614-6. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Braunstein LZ, Morrow M. Regional Nodal Management in the Setting of Up-Front Surgery. Semin Radiat Oncol 2022;32:221-7. 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.01.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Noguchi M, Inokuchi M, Yokoi-Noguchi M, et al. Axillary Reverse Mapping in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2023;15:5302. 10.3390/cancers15215302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Giuliano AE, Ballman K, McCall L, et al. Locoregional Recurrence After Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection With or Without Axillary Dissection in Patients With Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Long-term Follow-up From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (Alliance) ACOSOG Z0011 Randomized Trial. Ann Surg 2016;264:413-20. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001863 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Barrio AV, Montagna G, Mamtani A, et al. Nodal Recurrence in Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-A Rare Event. JAMA Oncol 2021;7:1851-5. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bartels SAL, Donker M, Poncet C, et al. Radiotherapy or Surgery of the Axilla After a Positive Sentinel Node in Breast Cancer: 10-Year Results of the Randomized Controlled EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial. J Clin Oncol 2023;41:2159-65. 10.1200/JCO.22.01565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pan H, Gray R, Braybrooke J, et al. 20-Year Risks of Breast-Cancer Recurrence after Stopping Endocrine Therapy at 5 Years. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1836-46. 10.1056/NEJMoa1701830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Colleoni M, Sun Z, Price KN, et al. Annual Hazard Rates of Recurrence for Breast Cancer During 24 Years of Follow-Up: Results From the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials I to V. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:927-35. 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Loibl S, Poortmans P, Morrow M, et al. Breast cancer. Lancet 2021;397:1750-69. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32381-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mamounas EP, Bandos H, White JR, et al. Omitting Regional Nodal Irradiation after Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 2025;392:2113-24. 10.1056/NEJMoa2414859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    The article’s supplementary files as

    gs-15-05-111-coif.pdf (253.8KB, pdf)
    DOI: 10.21037/gs-2026-1-0103

    Articles from Gland Surgery are provided here courtesy of AME Publications

    RESOURCES