Abstract
Filamentous fungi are widely used for industrial protein production but their tendency to form dense mycelial pellets limits nutrient transfer, oxygen uptake and fermentation efficiency. While cell wall components are known to influence fungal aggregation, the molecular mechanisms linking cell wall biosynthesis to macroscopic morphology remain poorly defined. Using Aspergillus oryzae as a model, we show that perturbation of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein biosynthesis influences fungal morphology by altering cell wall composition. Disruption of the GPI ethanolamine phosphate transferase 1 (mcd4) or inhibition of glucosaminyl phosphatidylinositol acyltransferase Gwt1 using antifungal drug manogepix (MGX) induced hyper-branching and weakened the cell wall. Notably, chemical inhibition of Gwt1 by MGX causes a marked transition from pelleted to dispersed mycelial growth. Solid-state NMR (ssNMR) analysis revealed reorganisation of galactosaminogalactan (GAG) and galactomannan (GM), including complete loss of cationic galactosamine (GalN), a key determinant of hyphal adhesion. Transcriptomic analysis revealed downregulation of genes involved in somatic cell fusion, linking altered wall composition to impaired germling aggregation. Strikingly, MGX treatment induced distinct morphological outcomes in other industrially relevant fungi, indicating species-specific cell-wall dependencies. Together, these findings identify GPI-anchored proteins as key regulators of fungal morphology and provide a framework for rational morphology engineering to improve industrial fermentation.
Introduction
Aspergillus oryzae is an important filamentous fungus widely used in biotechnology for industrial production of recombinant proteins, enzymes and secondary metabolites1 owing to its strong capabilities in protein expression, secretion and post-translational modification2. However, the dynamic fungal morphology (compact pellets, loose mycelial clumps, or dispersed hyphae) in submerged culture remains a major challenge in controlling the outcome of large-scale fermentation, as it strongly influences culture viscosity and fermentation efficiency3,4,5. Pelleted growth reduces viscosity but limits nutrients and oxygen diffusion into the pellet core, whereas dispersed mycelia enhance mass transfer but markedly increase viscosity, hindering gas-liquid exchange3. The macro-morphology of filamentous fungi is influenced by inoculum concentration, pH, medium composition, agitation rate, etc6. At a molecular level, pellet formation is thought to be largely governed by hydrophobic, electrostatic and specific interactions between spore wall components7.
The A. oryzae cell wall is primarily composed of polysaccharides, such as α-glucan, β-glucan, chitin, galactomannan (GM) and galactosaminogalactan (GAG), and a small fraction of lipids and proteins (< 20%)8,9. GAG and α-1,3-glucan mediate hyphal and conidial aggregation, respectively, in A. oryzae10, while α-1,3-glucan promotes conidial aggregation in A. fumigatus11. However, the precise mechanisms by which the cell wall composition affects mycelial aggregation remain to be fully elucidated.
Besides polysaccharides, glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins, galactomannoproteins and other surface proteins are also present in the fungal cell wall. GPI-anchors are glycolipids that post-translationally attach to the C-terminus of secretory proteins, tethering them to the plasma membrane or cell wall12. GPI-anchored proteins play essential roles in ligand recognition, enzymatic activity, cell-cell interaction, and host defense13. Many participate in cell wall synthesis and remodeling, including the GEL family proteins (β-1,3-glucan elongation and branching) and the DFG family proteins (covalent attachment of GM to β-1,3-glucan-chitin core)13. Moreover, GPI-anchors are involved in GM trafficking from Golgi body to cell wall, further highlighting their critical role in maintaining cell wall integrity14. Thus, perturbation of GPI-anchor biosynthesis is expected to substantially affect cell-wall structure and composition.
GPI-anchor biosynthesis occurs in the ER and requires sequential action of more than 20 enzymes (Supplementary Fig. 1). One such enzyme is Mcd4 (morphogenesis checkpoint dependent) an integral membrane protein with 14 transmembrane segments15,16, that was first identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant exhibiting defects in bud emergence and polarized growth15. Mcd4 catalyses the transfer of phosphoethanolamine (EtN-P) to the first mannose (Man1) of phosphatidylinositol (PI) anchor, a conserved step in the GPI-anchor biosynthetic pathway15,17,18. MCD4 deletion is lethal in S. cerevisiae19, but the lethality can be rescued by expressing Trypanosoma brucei Gpi10p, which bypasses substrate requiring Mcd4 action20. The mcd4-null studies revealed its role in ensuring proper tethering of GPI-anchored proteins to the β-1,6-glucan in the cell wall in S. cerevisiae20,21. Furthermore, mcd4 deletion alters cell wall composition, increasing chitin and chitin-linked alkali-insoluble β-1,6-glucan while reducing mannans22. Importantly, Mcd4 supports normal ER function by mediating ATP uptake16 and facilitating trafficking of GPI-anchored proteins from the ER to the Golgi20.
Manogepix (MGX; APX001A) is an antifungal developed by Amplyx Pharmaceuticals that targets the GPI-anchor biosynthetic enzyme Gwt1 in fungi23. Gwt1 works upstream of Mcd4 and catalyses the transfer of fatty acyl chains to inositol moiety of GPI anchor precursors. In Candida albicans, exposure to MGX at four times the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) resulted in depletion of cell-surface mannoproteins, increased cell size and elevated chitin content24.
In this study, we perturbed GPI-anchor biosynthesis in A. oryzae by either deleting mcd4 or by chemically inhibiting Gwt1 with MGX to investigate their effects on cell wall architecture, macro-morphology and recombinant protein secretion (Figure 1a). By integrating ssNMR and transcriptomics analyses of the perturbed strains, we identified potential morphology-related genes that may serve as targets for rational morphology engineering.
Figure 1: Perturbation of GPI-anchor biosynthesis alters fungal morphology and affects hyphal integrity in A. oryzae.
(a) Schematic of GPI-anchor biosynthesis at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) lumen and strategies to disrupt the pathway through mcd4 deletion and Gwt1 inhibition via manogepix (MGX). Created with Biorender.com and ChemDraw v21.0.0. (b) Colony morphology of AO1 and Δmcd4 strains grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA) for 7 d at 30 °C. (c) Hyphal morphology of AO1 and Δmcd4 strains in Aspergillus minimal medium (AMM) supplemented with 1% glucose for 18 h. Septa were stained with calcofluor white (CFW) to visualize inter-septal distance. Scale bar, 200 μm. (d) Inter-septal distances of hyphae from ImageJ analyses of CFW-stained AO1 and Δmcd4 hyphae. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test using GraphPad Prism v9.3.1; datasets labelled with different letters differ significantly at P < 0.05. (e) Macro-morphology comparison of AO1, Δmcd4 and MGX-treated AO1 at increasing concentrations of MGX grown in 5×DPY medium for 4 d. Scale bar, 1000 μm. (f) Morphology number of fungal pellets (n > 10) from ImageJ analyses of AO1, Δmcd4 and MGX-treated AO1 microscopy images. (g) Sorbitol partially rescues the phenotype of Δmcd4 and AO1 + MGX strains grown in AMM without (–) or with (+) 1.2 M sorbitol. Cells were stained with CFW. Scale bar, 200 μm. (h) Inter-septal distances and (i) cell length of hyphae from ImageJ analyses of CFW-stained hyphae microscopy images (n > 10). Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against AO1 or Student’s t-test using GraphPad Prism v9.3.1: P ≤ 0.05 (*), P ≤ 0.01 (**), P ≤ 0.001 (***), P ≤ 0.0001 (****).
Results
Perturbation of GPI anchor synthesis affects cell wall integrity and morphology
The GPI-anchored proteins in A. oryzae RIB40 were predicted in silico by screening the complete proteome on UniProt and FungiDB using SignalP-6.0 and NetGPI-1.1, identifying 78 candidates (Supplementary Table 1). Many of these GPI-APs are implicated in cell wall polysaccharide remodelling or mediate interactions between fungal cells25. We therefore investigated whether perturbation of GPI anchor biosynthesis influences pellet morphology. We examined the phenotypic consequences of deleting the mcd4 and gwt1 genes which encode the GPI ethanolamine phosphate transferase 1 and glucosaminyl phosphatidylinositol acyltransferase, respectively15,26. A. oryzae strain RIB40 ΔwA::amyB-Lys-Arg-HLY (hereafter termed AO1), which expresses human lysozyme (HLY) as a secretion reporter27, was used as the base strain for our experiments. Both Δmcd4 and Δgwt1 mutants displayed markedly altered morphology with fewer hyphae and slower growth (Figure 1b). However, the Δgwt1 mutants could not be successfully revived from glycerol stocks, preventing further characterization (data not shown). The Δmcd4 mutant exhibited smaller colony radius and diminished conidiation compared to AO1 on potato dextrose agar (PDA) (Figure 1b). It also displayed a hyper-branching phenotype as reflected by significantly shorter inter-septal distance relative to AO1 (Figure 1c, d). Hyper-branching is common in fungal strains with weakened cell walls, as reduced inter-septal distance increases cell rigidity28. Consistent with this possibility, the Δmcd4 mutant showed hyphal swelling and localized cell wall rupture, indicating compromised cell wall integrity (Supplementary Fig. 2a).
Owing to the poor revivability of the frozen Δgwt1 stocks, we explored a chemical genetic strategy using MGX, a Gwt1 inhibitor, which enables dose-dependent and reversible inhibition of protein function29,23. We treated the AO1 fungal cultures with varying doses of MGX (0.01–0.50 mg/L) and monitored their morphology over the course of 4 days. While low MGX concentration-treated fungal cultures largely formed pellets, MGX treatment at 0.12 and 0.50 mg/L resulted in largely dispersed mycelia with a few small pellets (Figure 1e). This was accompanied by a significant decrease in morphology number in the 0.50 mg/L MGX-treated AO1 culture (Figure 1f). The Δmcd4 mutant, however, formed spherical pellets similar to the AO1 strain (Figure 1e).
Swollen hyphae, indicative of cell wall stress, were also observed in AO1 strain treated with 0.50 mg/L MGX (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Consistent with this observation, the addition of 1.2 M sorbitol to the Δmcd4 mutant and 0.50 mg/L MGX-treated AO1 partially rescued the cell wall defect by reducing hyphal swelling and restoring normal branching behaviour in Δmcd4 mutant (Figure 1g,h) and significantly increased the cell length of MGX-treated AO1 (Figure 1i). However, sorbitol addition did not rescue the pellet morphology in 0.50 mg/L MGX-treated AO1 (Supplementary Fig. 2c), suggesting that defective GPI-anchor synthesis continues to influence macro-morphology even after sorbitol addition.
MGX modulates A. oryzae morphology through Gwt1 inhibition and is the most effective at the conidial stage
The chemical perturbation of Gwt1 and deletion of mcd4 produced different morphological outcomes, despite both strategies targeting the GPI anchor synthesis. To test whether the morphological effects induced by MGX were due to Gwt1 inhibition, we introduced the MGX-resistance mutations previously identified in S. cerevisiae Gwt1 into the A. oryzae AO1 gwt1 gene30. Mutations in ScGwt1 G132, F238, S170, V168, L136, I141, F171, Y400 and Y408 resulted in resistance towards MGX30. Sequence alignment of ScGwt1 and AoGwt1 shows that the residues I141, V168, F171, and F238 in ScGWT1 are conserved and correspond to I150, V177, F180, and F248 in AoGwt1, respectively (Figure 2a) Structural alignment of AoGwt131 with the ScGwt1–MGX complex (PDB ID: 8XIK)30 yielded a backbone root-mean-square-deviation (RMSD) of 1.378 Å across 341 aligned residues, confirming conservation of these sites within the MGX binding pocket (Figure 2b). We introduced the MGX-resistance mutations in AoGwt1 via CRISPR-mediated gene editing32, and compared the sensitivity of AO1, Gwt1-I150A and Gwt1-V177A+F180A to MGX. Gwt1-V177A+F180A showed enhanced resistance towards MGX, while Gwt1-I150A showed partial resistance up to 0.25 mg/L (Figure 2c). We then compared the morphology-modulating effects of MGX on wild type and MGX-resistant strains in submerged cultures. As observed previously, MGX treatment (0.50 mg/L) of AO1 resulted in predominantly dispersed mycelia with significant reduction in morphology number (Figure 2d,e). In the partially resistant Gwt1-I150A mutant, we observed a mixed morphology consisting of both dispersed hyphae and pellets, resulting in a huge range of morphology number (Figure 2d,e). Importantly, the MGX-resistant Gwt1-V177A+F180A mutant strain retained its pellet morphology and was indistinguishable from its DMSO-treated control, with no significant difference in morphology number (Figure 2d,e). These results demonstrate that MGX exerts its morphological effects through by inhibition of Gwt1 in A. oryzae, rather than through off-target toxicity.
Figure 2: MGX perturbs A. oryzae morphology through Gwt1 inhibition.
(a) Sequence alignment of S. cerevisiae Gwt1 (ScGwt1) and A. oryzae Gwt1 (AoGwt1). Residues I150, V177, F180, and F248 in A. oryzae (pink) are homologous to MGX-resistance sites I141, V168, F171, and F238 in S. cerevisiae. (b) Structural superimposition of AoGwt1 (cyan) and ScGwt1–MGX complex (magenta, PDB: 8XIK). (c) MGX minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) on AO1 and alanine-substituted mutants (Gwt1-I150A and Gwt1-V177A+ F180A) grown on PDA for 2 days (d) Macro-morphology comparison of AO1 and alanine-substituted mutants following 0.50 mg/L MGX treatment in 5×DPY medium compared to DMSO control for 3 d. Scale bar, 1000 μm. (f) Time-resolved effects of MGX (0.50 mg/L) on AO1 morphology against DMSO control. MGX was dosed at 0, 24 and 48 h post-inoculation (hpi) and macro-morphology of fungal culture analysed after 3–4 d. Scale bar, 1000 μm. Morphology number of fungal pellets (n > 10) from ImageJ analyses of fungal pellet microscopy images for (e) alanine-substituted mutants and (g) time-resolved MGX treatment against AO1 (DMSO control). Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against AO1 using GraphPad Prism v9.3.1: P ≤ 0.05 (*), P ≤ 0.01(**), P ≤ 0.001 (***), P ≤ 0.0001 (****).
Pellet formation in fungal cultures can result from aggregation of either conidia or mycelia or via a combination of both4,33. We therefore compared the morphology-modulating effects of MGX on conidia and mycelia by adding 0.50 mg/L MGX at 0, 24 and 48 h post-inoculation (hpi) and analysed their effects on morphology on days 3 and 4 (Figure 2f). The AO1 culture treated with MGX 0 hpi resulted in the most pronounced morphological changes, yielding predominantly dispersed mycelia morphology and significantly reduced morphology number (Figure 2g). While the AO1 culture treated with MGX at 24 and 48 hpi resulted in some pellet formation, these cultures still exhibited higher proportion of dispersed mycelia compared to DMSO-treated control. The pellet analyses showed significant reduction in morphology number, although the difference from DMSO control is less significant in 48 hpi MGX-treated culture compared to 0 and 24 hpi MGX-treated culture (Figure 2g). These observations indicate that MGX can disrupt the GPI-anchor biosynthesis to affect morphology in both spores and actively growing mycelia but is more effective when added at conidial stage.
Morphological modulation by chemical inhibition of Gwt1 and mcd4 deletion uncovers opposing effects on growth and secretion
To assess whether perturbation of GPI-anchored proteins and morphology influences protein secretion, we compared HLY production in AO1, Δmcd4 and AO1 treated with 0.5 mg/L MGX (AO1 + MGX), over 3–5 days of submerged fermentation. As expected, the Δmcd4 mutant formed pellets similar to AO1 and the MGX-treated AO1 exhibited dispersed mycelial morphology (Figure 3a,b). Despite exhibiting similar morphology and biomass-normalised culture viscosity as AO1 (Figure 3a,c) the biomass accumulation in Δmcd4 was consistently lower than that of AO1 (Figure 3d), reflecting a growth defect. The biomass-normalized HLY titres was, however, comparable to AO1 on days 3 and 4, and exceeded AO1 by day 5, indicating that its secretion efficiency was not affected by the growth defect and the secreted protein/ biomass ratio remains unchanged (Figure 3e).
Figure 3: Genetic and chemical perturbation of GPI-anchor biosynthesis differentially affect morphology, growth, viscosity, and HLY secretion.
(a) Macro-morphology comparison of A. oryzae AO1, Δmcd4 and AO1 + MGX (0.5 mg/L MGX) cultured in 5×DPY for 3–5 d. Scale bar, 1000 μm. (b) Morphology number of fungal pellets from ImageJ analyses of A. oryzae pellet microscopy images. (c) Biomass-normalised viscosity, (d) dry biomass, and (e) biomass-normalised HLY of the A. oryzae cultures. Data represent mean ± s.d. of three biological replicates cultured in independent flasks. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test against WT using GraphPad Prism v9.3.1: P ≤ 0.05 (*), P ≤ 0.01(**), P ≤ 0.001 (***), P ≤ 0.0001 (****).
The freely dispersed morphology of mycelia in MGX-treated strain was associated with both reduced viscosity (Figure 3c) and enhanced biomass accumulation (Figure 3d). However, these apparent advantages did not translate into improved protein secretion. Biomass-normalized HLY titres decreased by 30% and 13 % on days 3 and 5, respectively (Figure 3e), indicating that the secretion efficiency was partially impaired by GPI-anchor biosynthesis inhibition. Although the volumetric enzymatic production in MGX-treated AO1 culture showed significant reduction on day 3, it remained largely comparable to that of AO1 on days 4 and 5 (Supplementary Fig. 3). These results suggest that MGX treatment effectively lowers A. oryzae culture viscosity and promotes biomass accumulation, while maintaining overall volumetric protein secretion at levels comparable to AO1.
Solid-state NMR and transcriptomics data revealed reduced cell wall GAG and GM levels in response to perturbation of GPI-anchor biosynthesis
Since GPI-anchored proteins play important roles in cell wall biosynthesis, assembly and maintenance, we examined how perturbation of GPI-anchor biosynthesis alters cell wall polysaccharide organisation. The cell wall composition of AO1, Δmcd4 and AO1 + MGX were analysed using ssNMR spectroscopy. This technique enables direct characterisation of intact, insoluble cell walls, providing atomic-level insights into the native polysaccharide composition, organization, and dynamics34,35.
Dynamically distinct structural domains were selectively probed using different polarization techniques: the hydrophobic and rigid core was probed using 1H-13C cross-polarisation (CP)-based 2D CORD experiments36,37, while the hydrated and mobile outer shell was examined using through-bond 13C connectivity tracked by direct polarisation (DP)-based 2D J-INADEQUATE experiments38,39,40. The rigid core of the Δmcd4 mutant cell wall was largely comparable to that of AO1, with only a slight increase in type-a α-1,3-glucan (Aa), while type-b (Ab) remained unchanged. Interestingly, redistribution of chitin allomorphs was also observed, where a decrease in type-a chitin (Cha) was compensated by an increase in Chb, while β-1,3-glucans (B) levels were relatively stable (Figure 4a,b and Supplementary Table 2). In contrast, in the MGX-treated AO1 strain, a reduction of linear β-glucan chain in the inner core was accompanied by an increase in Chb and Ab (Figure 4a,b and Supplementary Table 2). These changes reflect a compensatory response, in which key structural organizational components are offset by increases in rigid polysaccharides such as α-glucan and chitin41. The increase in chitin content helps to enhance the cell wall stability and rigidity and represents a conserved adaptive mechanism observed across many fungal species exposed to cell wall stress42,43.
Figure 4: Perturbation of GPI-anchor biosynthesis alters the cell wall organization of A. oryzae.
a) Overlay of 2D 13C-13C CORD spectra comparing AO1, Δmcd4 and MGX-treated AO1 in cyan, magenta and orange, respectively. The spectra highlight changes in rigid polysaccharides, including the emergence of a distinct α-1,3-glucan form upon drug treatment, accompanied by increased chitin content. Colour coding and abbreviations are consistent throughout α-1,3-glucan (A), β-1,3-glucan (B), and chitin (Ch). Cross-peaks are indicated by dashed lines, including correlations originating from the diagonal resonances. (b) Relative abundance of rigid polysaccharides with consistent colour coding. (c) Overlay of 13C-13C DP INADEQUATE spectra highlighting the mobile cell wall components, using the same colour schemes. Mobile polysaccharides include α-1,3-glucan (A), β-1,3-glucan (B), β-1,3/1,6-glucan (BBr), galactofuranose (Galf), α-1,2-mannan (Mn1,2), α-1,6-mannan (Mn1,6), galactopyranose (Galp), galactosamine (GalN), N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc), with consistent colour coding and abbreviations and colour coding. These data reveal compositional changes in the outer cell wall: a decrease in GM components and absence of GalN in MGX-treated AO1. (d) Molar composition of mobile cell wall polysaccharides estimated from resolved spin pairs in 2D 13C DP INADEQUATE spectra showing reduced GM and GAG under GPI-anchor-perturbed conditions.
In the hydrated and mobile outer shell, both Δmcd4 and MGX-treated AO1 showed a decline in the content of GAG and GM, accompanied by a compensatory increase in α-glucan and β-glucan (B or BBr) (Figure 4c,d and Supplementary Table 2). This selective depletion can be directly linked to the role of GPI anchors in polysaccharide trafficking and incorporation. GM is synthesized in the Golgi and transported to the cell surface via GPI-linked intermediates that are directly attached to the mannan chain14. This explains why disruption of GPI anchor biosynthesis preferentially reduces mannan components (α-1,2- and α-1,6-linked mannans), while galactofuranose (Galf) side chains are largely retained. The interaction between GM and β-1,3-glucan in the cell wall plays an important role in proper cell wall synthesis by providing cell wall support. Inhibition of GM synthesis disrupts cell wall organization, leading to a characteristic phenotype of hyperbranched mycelium and swollen filaments44–47, as also observed in GM-depleted AO1 (Supplementary Fig. 2d,e).
More importantly, the cationic galactosamine (GalN) units of GAG were completely lost in MGX-treated AO1, while N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) and galactopyranose (Galp) were retained (Figure 4d). A similarly restructured GAG composition has recently been observed in Aspergillus sydowii under hypersaline conditions, and this change likely disrupts GAG-mediated surface adhesion and mycelial aggregation48. Consistent with this, the absence of GalN correlates with the observed dispersed mycelial morphology, highlighting its functional role in the hyphal aggregation and biofilm formation. While the levels of branched beta-glucan (BBr) were relatively unchanged, both Δmcd4 mutant and MGX treatment induced redistribution towards more linear β-glucan chains. This suggests that the GPI-anchor perturbation affects not only composition but also the structure and organization of polysaccharides.
Transcriptomics analyses revealed differential response to GPI-anchor perturbation induced through genetic and chemical genetic approaches
The cellular responses to GPI-anchor biosynthesis perturbation were investigated by the transcriptomic profiling of AO1, Δmcd4 and MGX-treated AO1 strains cultured in 5×DPY medium for 3–4 days (Figure 5a). Among the 12,074 genes in the A. oryzae RIB40 genome, 913 and 893 differentially expressed genes (DEGs; |log2 fold change (log2FC) | > 1.5, FDR < 0.05) were identified in Δmcd4 mutants on days 3 and 4, respectively, whereas 2,183 and 2,348 DEGs were detected in MGX-treated AO1 cells (Figure 5b). MGX treatment induced more pronounced transcriptomics changes, as reflected by with the broader range of log2FC values (Supplementary Fig. 4). Heatmap analysis revealed distinct DEG clusters with shared or condition-specific expression patterns (Supplementary Fig. 5). Principal component analysis (PCA) showed the biological triplicates clustered together, with clear separation among the four treatment groups on day 3. However, AO1 and Δmcd4 showed reduced separation on day 4 (Supplementary Fig. 6). This less distinct transcriptomic profile between AO1 and Δmcd4 may explain the similarities in their morphologies. RT-qPCR analysis of selected upregulated and downregulated genes further validated the RNA-seq data, showing consistent expression trends (Supplementary Fig. 7).
Figure 5: Transcriptomics profiling reveals widespread differential gene expression during perturbation of GPI-anchor biosynthesis.
(a) Schematic diagram of workflow for biomass preparation and RNA extraction (Icons generated by ChatGPT 5, OpenAI, 16 September 2025). (b) Venn diagram of DEGs identified in Δmcd4 and MGX-treated AO1 on days 3 and 4 relative to AO1, showing that MGX-treatment induced stronger transcriptomics response. GO enrichment plot from over-representation analysis (ORA) conducted on DEGs identified in (c) Δmcd4 and (e) MGX-treated AO1 relative to AO1 on day 3. Enriched GO terms were filtered by REVIGO and GO terms with dispensability < 0.5 are displayed in bubble plot. Bubble size represents the gene number while the colour reflects the p-value. Gene–concept networks highlighting DEGs associated with multiple enriched GO terms in (d) Δmcd4 and (f) MGX-treated AO1 relative to AO1 on day 3. Lines connect shared genes among terms. Each beige node represents a GO term, and node size reflects the number of associated genes. The colour of the gene nodes represents the log2FC.
Over-representation analysis (ORA) was conducted to identify GO terms enriched by the up- and down-regulated genes in Δmcd4 and MGX-treated AO1. GO terms shortlisted by REVIGO with dispensability < 0.5 were plotted in the GO enrichment bubble plots (Figure 5c,e and Supplementary Fig. 8a,b). GO terms enriched by downregulated genes were excluded by REVIGO in most cases, except in MGX-treated AO1 on day 4 (Supplementary Figure 8b). Gene-concept network plots highlighted specific cluster of genes driving the enriched GO terms (Figure 5d,f and Supplementary Fig. 9a,b).
The analyses revealed distinct pathway enrichment profiles in genetic and chemical-genetic perturbation of GPI-anchor biosynthesis. The Δmcd4 mutant upregulated the secondary metabolite, amino acid and carboxylic acid biosynthetic pathways, while MGX treatment upregulated genes associated with protein synthesis such as ribosomal subunit, protein folding, regulation of translational fidelity, and small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU-rRNA). GPI-anchor perturbation induced transcriptional changes associated with the cell wall remodelling in both conditions. However, GO enrichment analysis revealed stronger enrichment in MGX-treated AO1 (−log10(adjusted p-value) = 3.06 on day 3) compared to Δmcd4 (Figure 5c,e and Supplementary Fig. 8b), suggesting more extensive cell wall remodelling upon chemical perturbation. By contrast, genes associated with siderophore-iron import into cell were enriched among upregulated genes in both conditions, with a stronger enrichment in Δmcd4 (−log10(adjusted p-value) = 1.81 on day 3). This upregulation of iron homeostasis related pathways may reflect oxidative stress under GPI-anchor perturbation, particularly in Δmcd4, as heme is an essential cofactor for detoxification enzymes, including catalase and peroxidases49.
Upregulation of ribosomal proteins is typically associated with increased protein synthesis, either during rapid growth or as part of a cellular stress response to restore translation50. Given that GPI-anchor biosynthesis occurs in the ER, disrupting this pathway is expected to accumulate misfolded GPI-anchored proteins intermediates, thereby inducing ER stress51,52. Consistent with this, MGX-treated AO1 exhibited upregulation of multiple components of unfolded protein response (UPR) and ER-associated degradation (ERAD). The molecular chaperone BipA (AO090003000257) was strongly upregulated (log2FC = 3.2), alongside several unfolded protein-binding proteins (AO090012000995, AO090011000764, AO090102000620, AO090011000513, AO090103000007; log2FC = 1.5 to 2.4), indicative of an activated proteostasis network. On the other hand, amino acid biosynthesis was upregulated in Δmcd4, a response associated with late stage ER stress response53.
Despite a pronounced transcriptional signature of ER stress, both the Δmcd4 and AO1 + MGX strains displayed tunicamycin tolerance comparable to AO1, with all strains tolerating up to 10 μg/mL (Supplementary Fig. 10). Although protein secretion in MGX-treated AO1 was reduced by 30% on day 3, it recovered to levels comparable to AO1 (Figure 3e). Notably, MGX-treated AO1 showed increased biomass accumulation (Figure 3d). Together, these results suggest that despite ER stress induction following GPI-anchor disruption, cellular proteostasis remains sufficiently buffered to sustain growth and secretion. GPI-anchor-perturbed strains exhibited cell wall stress, as evidenced by swollen cells and hyper-branched mycelia, which were partially rescued by sorbitol (Figure 1g). This stress likely activates the UPR and cell wall integrity (CWI) pathway to promote cell wall repair and restore cellular homeostasis54–56. Notably, Δmcd4 and MGX-treated AO1 appeared to engage distinct adaptive responses to overcome the cell wall stress. In Δmcd4 mutant, the upregulation of amino acid, secondary metabolite, polyketide and siderophore biosynthesis may help to mitigate intracellular oxidative stress57,58. By contrast, AO1 + MGX responded to cell wall stress through active cell wall remodelling by engaging genes associated with fungal-type cell wall and genes encoding ribosomal proteins. Together, these findings suggest that Δmcd4 and MGX-treated AO1 experience and respond to GPI-anchor perturbation differently. The mutant may have undergone longer-term adaptation to chronic defect in GPI-anchor biosynthesis, whereas acute inhibition by MGX imposes a more immediate stress that requires active cell wall remodelling for survival.
Although many of the GO terms enriched by downregulated genes were excluded in REVIGO, the gene-concept map showed GO terms related to syncytium formation by plasma membrane fusion, syncytium formation and cell-cell fusion being enriched among the same cluster of downregulated genes in Δmcd4 and MGX-treated AO1 on day 3 (Figure 5d,f). In filamentous fungi, somatic cell-cell fusion underpins genetic exchange, nutrient sharing and colony aggregation59,60. Although less frequent in asexual species, conidial anamostosis tubes (CAT)-mediated fusion has been reported in A. oryzae, promoting germling fusion events61. Consistently, homologues of Neurospora crassa fusion genes in A. oryzae were significantly downregulated under GPI-anchor perturbation conditions (Supplementary Table 3). Moreover, MGX addition prior to germination produced the most pronounced dispersed mycelia morphology (Figure 2e), implicating early fusion events promoting hyphal aggregation in untreated culture. Notably, the ortholog of N. crassa ham-7 (AO090020000438) encoding a GPI-anchored protein, was strongly repressed in MGX-treated AO1 (log2FC = −4.5 to −5), suggesting a potential link between GPI-anchor perturbation and impaired fusion. Together, these findings nominate cell-cell fusion as a previously underappreciated determinant of fungal macro-morphology and pellet formation.
Correlation between ssNMR-defined structural changes in cell wall and transcriptomic changes elicited by perturbation of GPI-anchor biosynthesis
To assess whether transcriptional regulation of polysaccharide biosynthetic genes could explain the ssNMR-defined changes in cell wall structure, we analysed the expression of genes involved in α-glucan, β-glucan, chitin, GAG, GM and GalN biosynthesis (Supplementary Fig. 11a). α-Glucan biosynthesis genes (agsB, agsC, amyD and amyG) were broadly upregulated, consistent with increased α-glucan abundance in the mobile phase of Δmcd4 and in both the core and mobile phases of MGX-treated AO1. Likewise, downregulation of GAG biosynthesis genes (gtb3, agd3 and ega3) correlated with reduced GAG levels in both strains. Notably, agd3 encoding GalNAc deacetylase was downregulated in MGX-treated AO1 (log2FC = −1.5 on day 4), potentially accounting for the complete absence of GalN in the MGX-treated AO1. Reduced expression of ktr4 encoding α-1,2-mannosyltransferase was also consistent with the decreased level of mannans.
While we observed a good correlation between compositional changes in α-glucan, GAG, GM and GalN and the expression of the corresponding biosynthetic genes, there was no such link observed for β-glucan and chitin levels. Regulation of genes involved in β-glucan biosynthesis was heterogeneous, with mixed transcriptional changes and no significant alteration in the expression of fksA encoding β-1,3-glucan synthase. Despite minimal changes in the expression of chitin synthase genes, the chitin content increased following perturbation of GPI-anchor biosynthesis. This suggests that post-transcriptional or other regulatory mechanisms could contribute to changes in β-glucan and chitin content.
Chemical inhibition of Gwt1 in several industrially important filamentous fungi has a contrasting effect on macro-morphology in comparison to A. oryzae
We then tested whether the morphology-modulating property of MGX is extendable to other industrially relevant filamentous fungi such as Aspergillus nidulans, Fusarium venenatum and Trichoderma reesei. In contrast to A. oryzae, the 3 other fungi exhibited dispersed mycelial growth in their unperturbed states. Intriguingly, addition of MGX converted dispersed hyphae to pellet formation in all the 3 strains, which is completely opposite to the effect of MGX observed in A. oryzae (Figure 6a). The formation of small compact mycelial pellets reduced the culture viscosity generally (Figure 6b), except in 5-day-old MGX-treated T. reesei despite the small pellet morphology. These findings demonstrate the potential of MGX application to modulate fungal morphology and reduce culture viscosity across diverse filamentous fungal systems.
Figure 6: Treatment of other industrially important filamentous fungi favours mycelial pellet formation.
(a) Macro-morphology of A. nidulans, F. venenatum and T. reesei cultured in 5×DPY for 5 d. Scale bar, 1000 μm. (b) Biomass-normalised viscosity of A. nidulans, F. venenatum and T. reesei cultured in 5×DPY for 3–5 d.
Discussion
We provide multiple lines of evidence demonstrating that the disruption of GPI-AP biosynthesis pathway alters the morphology of A. oryzae during submerged fermentation. Both the Δmcd4 and MGX-treated AO1 exhibited hyper-branching and swollen hyphae phenotypes. Chemical perturbation of GPI-anchor biosynthesis pathway via MGX treatment effectively altered macro-morphology from spherical pellets to dispersed mycelia. Alanine-substitution of Gwt1 residues involved in MGX interaction abolished the morphology-modulating effect, confirming that inhibition of Gwt1 function underlies the morphological changes. The ssNMR analysis revealed extensive cell wall remodeling, including redistribution of glucan and chitin components and depletion of mannan and GalN. Transcriptomic profiling reveals distinct adaptive responses to GPI-anchor perturbation-induced cell wall stress in Δmcd4 and MGX-treated AO1. Repression of cell-cell fusion under GPI-anchor perturbation suggests a potential role in regulating hyphal aggregation and pellet formation. Notably, MGX-induced morphological changes were species-specific, promoting dispersed growth in A. oryzae and favouring compact pellet in other filamentous fungi.
The transition from pellet to dispersed mycelia enhances biomass accumulation, improving nutrients and oxygen absorption; however, this morphological advantage does not translate into increased protein production. Despite higher biomass in MGX-treated AO1, the biomass-normalised protein secretion was reduced by 30% on day 3, indicating a bottleneck in secretion machinery caused by GPI-anchor biosynthesis disruption. We attribute this to pleiotropic disruption of GPI-anchor-dependent processes, including cell wall assembly and protein trafficking. These findings establish that morphology alone is insufficient to drive protein secretion and underscore the need to decouple morphological control from secretion function. It is therefore critical to identify GPI-anchor function-dependent factors that specifically regulate macro-morphology, to enable precise morphology engineering while preserving protein secretion capacity.
The ssNMR analysis of cell wall composition revealed redistribution of chitin and α-1,3-glucan allomorphs in the rigid phase and a reduction in mannan and GAG in the mobile phase under GPI-anchor-perturbed conditions, with complete depletion of GalN in MGX-treated AO1. While the mechanism underlying polysaccharide allomorph formation remains to be elucidated, GPI-anchor perturbation favoured type-b chitin and type-b α-1,3-glucan allomorphs, likely as a compensatory response to cell wall instability caused by the disruption. Further studies could uncover the mechanisms governing polysaccharide allomorph formation and how these structural changes influence fungal morphology. Depletion of GM is expected, as GPI anchors mediate its transport and covalent attachment to β-glucans in the cell wall62. While mannan levels were reduced, Galf content remained largely unchanged, consistent with its role as a side-chain moiety that does not directly depend on GPI-anchor linkage14. Given that GM is a key structural component that crosslinks with chitin-β-1,3-glucan complex, its depletion is expected to compromise cell wall integrity44–47. We propose that disruption of this chitin-β-1,3-glucan-GM scaffold weakens that cell wall architecture, thereby driving the hyperbranched and swollen hyphal phenotypes observed in GPI-anchor-perturbed strains (Figure 7).
Figure 7: A model to explain how cellular changes in A. oryzae AO1 cells subjected to GPI-anchor biosynthesis perturbation cause changes in morphology.
GPI-anchor biosynthesis perturbation causes GM depletion, weakens cell wall by reducing GM crosslink with chitin-β-1,3-glucan complex and results in hyper-branched and swollen filaments phenotypes. Chemical perturbation of GPI-anchor biosynthesis via MGX-treatment results in complete depletion of GalN indicating the importance of GalN in promoting hyphal aggregation. GPI-anchor biosynthesis perturbation represses cell-cell fusion genes, including the downregulation of N. crassa HAM-7 homolog that encodes a predicted GPI-anchor protein. Cell-cell fusion is hypothesised to promote germling aggregation which may affect fungal macro-morphology.
A feature unique to MGX-treated AO1 was the complete depletion of GalN in the GAG fraction of MGX-treated AO1, a modification thought to implicate hyphal aggregation through hydrogen bonding10. While the reason underlying GalN loss remains unclear, downregulation of agd3 may contribute to GalN depletion. We propose that the loss of GalN underlies the altered pellet morphology observed in MGX-treated A. oryzae (Figure 7). Transcriptomics analysis further identified cell-cell fusion pathways under GPI-anchor-perturbed conditions as a key determinant of morphology. Time-resolved MGX addition demonstrated maximal morphological impact at conidial stage (Figure 2e), consistent with previous reports on high cell-cell fusion frequency amongst germlings in N. crassa59. Notably, a GPI-AP homologous to N. crassa HAM-7, which functions with transmembrane proteins HAM-6 and HAM-8 to activate MAK-1 (mitogen-activated protein kinase) pathway during cell-cell signaling63,64, was downregulated. We therefore propose that GPI-anchor perturbation impairs HAM-7 function, disrupting its interaction with HAM-6 and HAM-8, attenuating cell-cell fusion event, thereby preventing hyphal aggregation and pellet formation (Figure 7).
Overall, this study highlights the distinct responses of A. oryzae to GPI-anchor perturbation under genetic and chemical perturbation conditions, which likely underlie the observed morphological differences during submerged fermentation. The acute cell wall stress induced by MGX treatment triggered extensive transcriptional reprogramming, leading to pleiotropic effects that drove a pronounced morphological transition from pellet growth to dispersed mycelia. To further confirm that partial inhibition of Gwt1 is responsible for the observed morphological change, future studies employing tunable promoter systems to precisely regulate gwt1 transcription may provide additional mechanistic validation.
Contrary to expectation, MGX treatment of A. nidulans, F. venenatum and T. reesei promoted the formation of small, compact pellets rather than freely dispersed mycelia. While unperturbed A. oryzae strains form pellets, these other fungi predominantly form dispersed mycelial network under the same conditions, indicating fundamental differences in cell wall architecture. Such differences likely shape the morphological response to GPI-anchor perturbation. We propose that different fungal species may deploy tailored GPI-anchor protein regulatory programmes to meet their specific cell wall requirements under stress, thereby determining their morphological outcomes. Comparative analyses of cell wall polysaccharide remodelling across fungal systems under GPI-anchor perturbation will be essential to elucidate the mechanistic role of cell wall composition in governing macro-morphology.
Conclusion
In conclusion, treatment of A. oryzae AO1 with MGX effectively converts the compact pellets to freely dispersed mycelia, revealing a tunable morphological state that is highly relevant for industrial fermentation. Our findings underscore the critical role of GPI-anchor-dependent GM trafficking in maintaining cell wall organization, as evidenced by the selective depletion of mannans chains under GPI-anchor-perturbed conditions. Although the mechanism underlying agd3 downregulation and complete loss of GalN in MGX-treated AO1 remains unknown, this finding suggests that GalN may be responsible for hyphal aggregation. Remarkably, MGX elicits opposite morphological outcome in other industrially relevant fungi, promoting the transition from freely dispersed mycelia to pellet formation. These results highlight the species-specific consequences of GPI-anchor perturbation, while establishing GPI-dependent cellular processes as a viable target for rational engineering of fungal morphology.
Materials & Methods
Gene knockout via CRISPR-Cas9
Strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 4, and primers and sgRNAs are listed in Supplementary Table 5. CRISPR/Cas9 gene-knock out was conducted using pHT001 modified from pPTR II plasmid (Takara Bio, Japan), containing yeast auxotrophic marker (TRP1), yeast origin of replication (ARS1), two sets of sgRNA cassette and Cas9 enzyme27. Two crRNAs were selected for each gene of interest using https://crispr.dbcls.jp/ and http://crispor.tefor.net/. Construction and amplification of sgRNA cassettes were conducted via PCR using Q5 High Fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, USA) and single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT, USA). The pHT001 plasmid was digested with SmaI and NotI and the two sets of sgRNA cassettes were inserted into the cut vector through yeast gap repair using S. cerevisiae strain (W303 strain). Plasmids were recovered from yeast and amplified by transforming Endura Electrocompetent Escherichia coli cells (LSC Biosearch Technologies, United Kingdom). The CRISPR plasmids were purified using Fastfilter Plasmid DNA Maxi Kit (Omega Bio-tek, USA) and transformed into A. oryzae via protoplast-mediated transformation.
Protoplast-mediated Aspergillus transformation
The lysozyme-producing A. oryzae strain RIB40 ΔwA::amyB-Lys-Arg-HLY (AO1) was used as a transformation host. Dextrose-polypeptone medium (DP; 2% dextrin, 1% polypeptone, 0.5% KH2PO4 and 0.05% MgSO4.7H2O [pH 5.5]) and potato dextrose agar (PDA; Sigma Aldrich, USA) were used for normal growth and maintenance of all strains. A. oryzae was transformed as described previously65. Briefly, mycelia cultured overnight in DP media are collected with sterile miracloth (Calbiochem 475855, Merck Millipore, US) and washed with sterile milli Q water. The mycelia were incubated in solution containing Yatalase (Takara Bio, Japan) at 30°C for 3 hours to form protoplasts. CRISPR plasmid (5–10 μg) was added to protoplast suspension (200 μL) that is adjusted to 1 × 107/mL and incubated on ice for 30 min. Poly(ethylene glycol)-containing solution was added to protoplast suspension and incubated at room temperature for 20 min. The mixture was added to Top Agar (21.86% sorbitol, 2% dextrin, 0.8% agar, 0.2% KCl, 0.15% NaNO3, 0.1% KH2PO4, 0.05% MgSO4.7H2O, 0.002% FeSO4.7H2O) with 0.1μg/mL pyrithiamine hydrobromide (P0256, Sigma Aldrich, USA) and plated onto Bottom Agar (1.5% agar). Transformation plates were incubated at 30°C for 4 days. The colonies were sub-cultured onto CDex agar (21.86% sorbitol, 2% dextrin, 1.8% agar, 0.3% NaNO3, 0.2% KCl, 0.1% KH2PO4, 0.05% MgSO4.7H2O, 0.002% FeSO4.7H2O) with 0.1μg/mL pyrithiamine hydrobromide.
Genomic DNA extraction for confirmation of gene knock-out
Spores isolated from transformation plate were inoculated into potato dextrose broth (Sigma Aldrich, USA) in screw cap tubes with 1 mm glass beads and incubated at 30°C for 48 hours. The media was then removed, 400 μL of DNA extract solution (0.1M Tris-HCL pH 8.0, 2% Triton X-100, 1% SDS, 10mM EDTA, 0.1M NaCl) and 400 μL of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1 v/v) was added and the mycelia was lysed in a bead homogeniser at 1,500 rpm for 1 min. Equal volume of isopropanol was added to the top layer in a clean tube to precipitate the DNA, and the pellet was washed with 1 mL of 70% ethanol. The DNA pellet was resuspended in sterile miliQ water and kept at −20°C until use. 2×Taq Mix Red (PCR Biosystems, United Kingdom) was used for colony PCR to confirm gene knock-out.
Protein sequence alignment and structural alignment
The AoGwt1 (AO090005001245) and ScGwt1 (YJL091C) protein sequences were downloaded from FungiDB release 68 and aligned using Jalview v2.11.5.166. The protein structures of AoGwt1 (PDB ID: Q2UQH4) and ScGwt1–MGX complex (PDB ID: 8XIK) were downloaded from AlphaFold Protein Structure Database31 and aligned using PyMOL v3.1.6.1.
Enzymatic assays
Approximately 5 × 105 conidia in saline Tween solution (0.02% Tween, 0.85% NaCl) were inoculated into 50 mL of 5×DPY (100 g L−1 dextrin, 50 g L−1 polypeptone, 25 g L−1 yeast extract, 5 g L−1 K2HPO4 and 0.5 g L−1 MgSO4, [pH 8.0]) in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask, and incubated at 30°C with agitation at 140 rpm. The lysozyme activity was measured as described by Morsky and Aine67. Briefly, 20 μL of culture supernatant is added to 80 μL of 150 μg/mL suspension of Micrococcus lysodeikticus ATCC 4698 lyophilized cells (Sigma-Aldrich, United States) in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.2). The decrease in absorbance at 450 nm, that was due to lysis of bacterial cells, was monitored at room temperature. The gradient of absorbance over time for culture supernatant was compared to standards containing 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25 and 0 mg/L HLY to determination of HLY concentration.
The amylase activity was measured by quantifying the reducing sugar released by α-amylase using 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNSA)68,69. Briefly, 40 μL of supernatant was added to 160 μL starch solution (1%) and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. Equal volume of DNSA reagent was added to the reaction mix and boiled at 100 °C for 15 min. The absorbance of the reaction mix at 540 nm was compared to 0 to 10 mM glucose calibration curve and α-amylase activity is reported in 1 U (μmol of glucose released per min).
Viscosity and biomass measurement
The 5×DPY fungal broth viscosity was measured using viscometer (Atago, Japan), consisting A1 spindle and 15-mL glass beaker, set at 250 rpm and stabilised for 30 s. The dry biomass was measured by filtering 15 mL fungal culture through miracloth (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) to collect the biomass, followed by washing with sterile miliQ water, drying the biomass and freeze-drying the biomass for at least 2 days.
Cultivation of fungal strains for morphology characterisation
For hyphal morphology analysis, 1 × 103 spores/ mL was cultivated in Aspergillus minimal medium (AMM)70 on cover slips in 6-well plates, incubated for 18 h at 30 °C. The cover slip was washed with deionised water and stained with calcofluor white stain (18909, Sigma-Aldrich, United States) before mounting onto glass slide. For pellet morphology, 1 × 104 spores/ mL was cultivated in 5×DPY, incubated for 3 – 4 days at 30 °C, 140 rpm. The mycelia from the 5×DPY culture was diluted by 20× with saline Tween solution and analysed on 6-well plate.
Microscopy for morphology characterisation of mutants
Hyphal morphology was analysed using Evos FL Bench Top Fluorescent Microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States) in bright-field and DAPI mode. Macro-morphology was analysed using Zeiss Primovert Inverted microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Germany) in bright-field and auto-exposure mode. Image analysis was conducted using ImageJ v2.14.071 as previously described27. Briefly, the images were converted to 8-bit grey-scale and a grey-scale threshold calculated using Otsu algorithm to obtain a binary image. The macro-morphological parameters such as projected area, Feret’s dimeter, solidity and aspect ratio were measured and calculated from the binary images. Morphology numbers were calculated from these obtained values72.
Preparation of cultures and 13C and 15N labelling
Solid cultures of A. oryzae AO1 and Δmcd4 mutant strains were first prepared using non-labelled conditions on a dextrose-based minimal medium supplemented with 1.5% agar. Isotopic labelling was subsequently performed by inoculating to a minimal medium containing 10.0 g/L of 13C-glucose and 6.0 g/L of 15N-sodium nitrate for uniform incorporation of isotopes into fungal biomass. The media was supplemented with 1 mL/L of trace-element solution (0.04% Na2B4O7·10H2O, 5 mM FeCl3) and 0.2 M HCl for preventing oxidation. Additionally, a solution containing 0.05% KCl, 0.08% MgSO4·7H2O, and 0.11% KH2PO4 was added. The medium was adjusted to pH 6.5. Parallel untreated and drug-treated mycelial cultures were prepared, and 0.5 mg/L MGX was added directly to the medium for the treatment condition. Mycelia were harvested after 3 days of growth. Cultures were grown in 100 mL liquid medium in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks at 30 °C with shaking at 210 rpm. Mycelia were collected by centrifugation at 13700 × g for 20 min and washed thoroughly with pure water. Approximately 30 mg of whole-cell material from each sample was packed into a 3.2 mm magic-angle spinning (MAS) rotor for solid-state NMR characterisation.
Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance
Solid-state NMR experiments were conducted on a Bruker Avance Neo 800 MHx spectrometer at the Max. T Roger NMR facility (Michigan State University, USA). 13C spectra were acquired using a 3.2 mm HCN probe under 15 kHz MAS with approximately 35 mg of sample packed in the rotor and a temperature of 277 K. Chemical shifts were referenced to adamantane (CH2 at 38.48 ppm). Radiofrequency field strengths were 71.4 kHz for 1H and 50–62.5 kHz for 13C. The rigid components of the cell wall were probed using CP-based 13C-13C CORD experiments73,74 with 1 ms CP and 53 ms mixing with 32 scans, while the mobile polysaccharides were characterized using DP-based refocused J-INADEQUATE experiments75,76 (2-s recycle delay and 32 scans).
Relative carbohydrate composition was determined based on the previous study35,42 by integrating well-resolved cross-peaks from CORD for rigid and INADEQUATE for mobile spectra using Topsin 4.1.4. Peak intensities were then normalized to obtain relative abundances, and uncertainties were estimated from the variance of the selected cross-peaks (Supplementary Table 2). The image was generated using Origin 2021.
RNA extraction
Approximately 5 × 105 conidia were inoculated into 50 mL of AMM70 in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask, and incubated at 30°C with agitation at 140 rpm for 72 hr. Cell biomass was collected by filtering through miracloth, thoroughly washed with sterile water, flash frozen and ground under liquid nitrogen. RNA was extracted using RNeasy Plant Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Briefly, 100 mg ground biomass was weighed into 2-mL screw cap tubes containing 0.5 mm glass beads and 450 μL of Buffer RLT (Qiagen, USA) supplemented with 0.1% β-mercaptoethanol was added. The biomass was sheared in a homogeniser at 6,000 rpm for 30s, for 5 times with 5 min of incubation on ice in between each shearing. The lysate was transferred to QIAshredder spin column (Qiagen, USA) and RNA was extracted following the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA sequencing was conducted by Novogene (Beijing, China) using NovaSeq X Plus systems (Illumina, USA). Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was conducted by synthesizing cDNA using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Germany) and running the RT-qPCR using KAPA SYBR Fast Master Mix qPCR Kit (Roche, Switzerland) on QuantStudio3 qPCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).
Transcriptomic data pre-processing
Raw paired-end Illumina RNA-seq reads (FASTQ) were first assessed using FastQC v0.11.9 to evaluate per-base sequence quality, GC content, duplication levels, and potential adapter contamination77. Adapter removal and quality trimming were performed using Trim Galore v0.6.6 (on paired-end samples)78, and FastQC for adapter detection and post-trimming quality assessment. Trimmed reads were aligned to the Aspergillus oryzae reference genome (ASM18445v3) using HISAT2 v2.2.179. Alignment files were processed using SAMtools v1.15: SAM files were converted to BAM format, filtered to retain primary alignments, sorted by genomic coordinate, and indexed for downstream quantification and visualization.
Gene-level read counts were generated using featureCounts v2.0.3 by assigning aligned reads to annotated gene features80,81. The resulting raw integer count matrix was used as input for differential gene expression analysis in R using DESeq2 v1.38.082. Prior to model fitting, low-support genes were filtered by retaining genes with a total count ⩾10 reads across all samples. DESeq2 was used to estimate size factors (normalization), model gene-wise dispersion, and test for differential expression using a negative binomial generalized linear model. log2FC estimation on AO1 group was used as the reference condition and expression in the Δmcd4 and MGX-treated AO1 on days 3 and 4 (target group) were compared against AO1 (reference group); therefore, positive log2FC values indicate higher expression in target, whereas negative log2FC values indicate lower expression relative to reference. log2FC shrinkage was applied to improve effect-size stability.
Multiple testing correction was performed using the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate procedure83, and genes with adjusted p < 0.05 were considered significantly differentially expressed. Differential expression results were annotated using gene features parsed from the A. oryzae annotation file using genomic range-based annotation tools, and quality assessments/visualisations such as MA plots, p-value distributions, and variance-stabilized sample distance heatmaps were generated.
Transcriptomics data analyses
GO term IDs and gene annotations were obtained from A. oryzae Gene Ontology data (FungiDB, release 68), with annotation updated using go-basic.obo v1.284,85. DEGs were stratified into upregulated (log2FC > 1.5) and downregulated (log2FC < −1.5) groups and analysed separately. Over-representation analysis (ORA) was performed using enricher function in clusterProfiler v4.14.686, with DEGs pvalueCutoff and qvalueCutoff set at 0.05 and 0.2, respectively, and using p-value adjustment by Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. The enriched GO terms and pvalues were extracted from enricher and filtered by REVIGO87 using medium cutoff of 0.7 for allowed similarity. The filtered GO term with dispensability values less than 0.5 were selected and visualised using ggplot2 v4.0.188. The gene number and p-value are represented by bubble size and colour, respectively, on the bubble plot. Gene-concept network analysis was conducted using cnetplot function in clusterProfiler v4.14.686 to visualise genes shared between different GO terms.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge Prof. Jean-Paul Latgé for his guidance and suggestions in fungal cell wall studies, Prof. Jun-ichi Maruyama for his valuable advice on Aspergillus oryzae transformation, and Dr. Naazneen Sofeo and Dr. Miselle Tiana Hengardi for their careful review of the manuscript. C.H.T gratefully acknowledges Prof. Sam Li Yau Fong for his academic guidance during her Ph.D. research.
Funding sources
This project was partly funded by the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, under the Strategic Research Programme (SIBER: C211917005). Solid-state NMR analysis of cell wall was supported by the National Institute of Health (NIH) under award number R01AI173270 to T.W.
C.H.T. gratefully acknowledges the Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) for a scholarship supporting her Ph.D. research in Chemistry at the National University of Singapore.
Funding Statement
This project was partly funded by the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, under the Strategic Research Programme (SIBER: C211917005). Solid-state NMR analysis of cell wall was supported by the National Institute of Health (NIH) under award number R01AI173270 to T.W.
C.H.T. gratefully acknowledges the Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) for a scholarship supporting her Ph.D. research in Chemistry at the National University of Singapore.
Footnotes
Competing Interests
A Singapore Non-Fully Drafted Patent Application has been filed to describe the method of regulating morphology of filamentous fungi during submerged fermentation using manogepix. The patent application has been filed through the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (Application Number: IP2025-157-01) and National University of Singapore (Application Number: 2025-357-01). The inventors are Prakash Arumugam and Hui Ting Chu. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
References
- 1.Daba G. M., Mostafa F. A. & Elkhateeb W. A. The ancient koji mold (Aspergillus oryzae) as a modern biotechnological tool. Bioresour Bioprocess 8, 52 (2021). 10.1186/s40643-021-00408-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Machida M. in Advances in Applied Microbiology Vol. 51 (eds Laskin Allen I., Bennett Joan W., & Gadd Geoffrey M.) 81–107e (Academic Press, 2002).12236061 [Google Scholar]
- 3.El Enshasy H. A. Fungal morphology: a challenge in bioprocess engineering industries for product development. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 35, 100729 (2022). 10.1016/j.coche.2021.100729 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cairns T. C., Zheng X., Zheng P., Sun J. & Meyer V. Moulding the mould: understanding and reprogramming filamentous fungal growth and morphogenesis for next generation cell factories. Biotechnol Biofuels 12, 77 (2019). 10.1186/s13068-019-1400-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wucherpfennig T., Kiep K. A., Driouch H., Wittmann C. & Krull R. in Advances in Applied Microbiology Vol. 72 (eds Laskin Allen I., Sariaslani Sima, & Gadd Geoffrey M.) 89–136 (Academic Press, 2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gromozova O., Grube M., Lytvyn P., Kharchuk M. & Fomina M. Cell wall characteristics of Thielavia terrestris dispersed and pelleted mycelia. Fungal Biology 129, 101593 (2025). 10.1016/j.funbio.2025.101593 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang J. & Zhang J. The filamentous fungal pellet and forces driving its formation. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 36, 1066–1077 (2016). 10.3109/07388551.2015.1084262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yoshimi A., Miyazawa K. & Abe K. Cell wall structure and biogenesis in Aspergillus species. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 80, 1700–1711 (2016). 10.1080/09168451.2016.1177446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ruiz-Herrera J. Chemical components of the cell wall of Aspergillus species. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 122, 118–125 (1967). 10.1016/0003-9861(67)90130-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Miyazawa K. et al. Both galactosaminogalactan and α-1,3-glucan contribute to aggregation of Aspergillus oryzae hyphae in liquid culture. Frontiers in Microbiology Volume 10 – 2019 (2019). 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fontaine T. et al. Cell wall α-1,3-glucans induce the aggregation of germinating conidia of Aspergillus fumigatus. Fungal Genetics and Biology 47, 707–712 (2010). 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vogt M. S., Schmitz G. F., Varón Silva D., Mösch H.-U. & Essen L.-O. Structural base for the transfer of GPI-anchored glycoproteins into fungal cell walls. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 22061–22067 (2020). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010661117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li J. et al. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors from galactomannan and GPI-anchored protein are synthesized by distinct pathways in Aspergillus fumigatus. Journal of Fungi 4, 19 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Costachel C., Coddeville B., Latgé J.-P. & Fontaine T. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored fungal polysaccharide in Aspergillus fumigatus. Journal of Biological Chemistry 280, 39835–39842 (2005). 10.1074/jbc.M510163200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gaynor E. C. et al. MCD4 encodes a conserved endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein essential for glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor synthesis in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 10, 627–648 (1999). 10.1091/mbc.10.3.627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhong X., Malhotra R. & Guidotti G. ATP uptake in the golgi and extracellular release require Mcd4 Protein and the vacuolar H+-ATPase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278, 33436–33444 (2003). 10.1074/jbc.M305785200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hong Y. et al. Pig-n, a mammalian homologue of yeast Mcd4p, is involved in transferring phosphoethanolamine to the first mannose of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274, 35099–35106 (1999). 10.1074/jbc.274.49.35099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Imhof I., Canivenc-Gansel E., Meyer U. & Conzelmann A. Phosphatidylethanolamine is the donor of the phosphorylethanolamine linked to the α-1,4-linked mannose of yeast GPI structures. Glycobiology 10, 1271–1275 (2000). 10.1093/glycob/10.12.1271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Imhof I. et al. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae contain ethanolamine phosphate groups on the α1,4-linked mannose of the GPI anchor. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, 19614–19627 (2004). 10.1074/jbc.M401873200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhu Y., Vionnet C. & Conzelmann A. Ethanolaminephosphate side chain added to glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor by Mcd4p is required for ceramide remodeling and forward transport of GPI proteins from endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi. Journal of Biological Chemistry 281, 19830–19839 (2006). 10.1074/jbc.M601425200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sakai Y. et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant displaying β-glucans on cell surface. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 103, 161–166 (2007). 10.1263/jbb.103.161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Maneesri J. et al. Deletion of MCD4 involved in glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor synthesis leads to an increase in β-1,6-glucan level and a decrease in GPI-anchored protein and mannan levels in the cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 99, 354–360 (2005). 10.1263/jbb.99.354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pfaller M. A., Huband M. D., Flamm R. K., Bien P. A. & Castanheira M. In vitro activity of APX001A (Manogepix) and comparator agents against 1,706 fungal isolates collected during an International Surveillance Program in 2017. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 63, 10.1128/aac.00840-00819 (2019). https://doi.org/doi:10.1128/aac.00840-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Covel J. et al. in 2019 Medicinal Chemistry Reviews 221–237 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 25.Samalova M. et al. GPI Anchored Proteins in Aspergillus fumigatus and Cell Wall Morphogenesis. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 425, 167–186 (2020). 10.1007/82_2020_207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Umemura M. et al. GWT1 gene is required for inositol acylation of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors in yeast. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278, 23639–23647 (2003). 10.1074/jbc.M301044200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chu H. T., Sofeo N., Jebamony J. J. & Arumugam P. The Cys2-His2 zinc finger transcription factor NsdC regulates hyphal branching, conidiation and mycelial pellet morphology in Aspergillus oryzae. Fungal Genetics and Biology 180, 104019 (2025). 10.1016/j.fgb.2025.104019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Górka-Nieć W., Perlińska-Lenart U., Zembek P., Palamarczyk G. & Kruszewska J. S. Influence of sorbitol on protein production and glycosylation and cell wall formation in Trichoderma reesei. Fungal Biology 114, 855–862 (2010). 10.1016/j.funbio.2010.07.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Florian S., Hümmer S., Catarinella M. & Mayer T. U. Chemical genetics: Reshaping biology through chemistry. HFSP Journal 1, 104–114 (2007). 10.2976/1.2752600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dai X. et al. Structural insights into the inhibition mechanism of fungal GWT1 by manogepix. Nature Communications 15, 9194 (2024). 10.1038/s41467-024-53512-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jumper J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021). 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Katayama T. et al. Forced recycling of an AMA1-based genome-editing plasmid allows for efficient multiple gene deletion/integration in the industrial filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Appl Environ Microbiol 85 (2019). 10.1128/aem.01896-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Veiter L., Rajamanickam V. & Herwig C. The filamentous fungal pellet-relationship between morphology and productivity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102, 2997–3006 (2018). 10.1007/s00253-018-8818-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ghassemi N. et al. Solid-State NMR Investigations of Extracellular Matrixes and Cell Walls of Algae, Bacteria, Fungi, and Plants. Chemical Reviews 122, 10036–10086 (2022). 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00669 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gautam I. et al. Breaking down the wall: Solid-state NMR illuminates how fungi build and remodel diverse cell walls. PLoS Pathog 21, e1013678 (2025). 10.1371/journal.ppat.1013678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hou G., Yan S., Trébosc J., Amoureux J.-P. & Polenova T. Broadband homonuclear correlation spectroscopy driven by combined R2nv sequences under fast magic angle spinning for NMR structural analysis of organic and biological solids. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 232, 18–30 (2013). 10.1016/j.jmr.2013.04.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lu X., Guo C., Hou G. & Polenova T. Combined zero-quantum and spin-diffusion mixing for efficient homonuclear correlation spectroscopy under fast MAS: broadband recoupling and detection of long-range correlations. J Biomol NMR 61, 7–20 (2015). 10.1007/s10858-014-9875-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cadars S. et al. The refocused INADEQUATE MAS NMR experiment in multiple spin-systems: Interpreting observed correlation peaks and optimising lineshapes. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 188, 24–34 (2007). 10.1016/j.jmr.2007.05.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lesage A., Bardet M. & Emsley L. Through-Bond Carbon–Carbon Connectivities in Disordered Solids by NMR. Journal of the American Chemical Society 121, 10987–10993 (1999). 10.1021/ja992272b [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chakraborty A. et al. A molecular vision of fungal cell wall organization by functional genomics and solid-state NMR. Nature Communications 12, 6346 (2021). 10.1038/s41467-021-26749-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Latgé J.-P. & Wang T. Modern biophysics redefines our understanding of fungal cell wall structure, complexity, and dynamics. mBio 13 (2022). 10.1128/mbio.01145-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dickwella Widanage M. C. et al. Adaptative survival of Aspergillus fumigatus to echinocandins arises from cell wall remodeling beyond β-1,3-glucan synthesis inhibition. Nature Communications 15, 6382 (2024). 10.1038/s41467-024-50799-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dickwella Widanage M. C. et al. Distinct echinocandin responses of Candida albicans and Candida auris cell walls revealed by solid-state NMR. Nature Communications 16, 6295 (2025). 10.1038/s41467-025-61678-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Muszkieta L. et al. The glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored DFG family Is essential for the insertion of galactomannan into the β-(1,3)-glucan–chitin core of the cell wall of Aspergillus fumigatus. mSphere 4, 10.1128/msphere.00397-00319 (2019). https://doi.org/doi:10.1128/msphere.00397-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Henry C. et al. Two KTR mannosyltransferases are responsible for the biosynthesis of cell wall mannans and control polarized growth in Aspergillus fumigatus. mBio 10, 10.1128/mbio.02647-02618 (2019). https://doi.org/doi:10.1128/mbio.02647-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Engel J., Schmalhorst P. S. & Routier F. H. Biosynthesis of the fungal cell wall polysaccharide galactomannan requires intraluminal GDP-mannose. J Biol Chem 287, 44418–44424 (2012). 10.1074/jbc.M112.398321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kadooka C. et al. Identification of galactofuranose antigens such as galactomannoproteins and fungal-type galactomannan from the yellow koji fungus (Aspergillus oryzae). Frontiers in Microbiology Volume 14 – 2023 (2023). 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1110996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fernando L. D. et al. Structural adaptation of fungal cell wall in hypersaline environment. Nat. Commun. 14, 7082 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Haas H. Iron – A Key Nexus in the Virulence of Aspergillus fumigatus. Frontiers in Microbiology Volume 3 – 2012 (2012). 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Shore D., Zencir S. & Albert B. Transcriptional control of ribosome biogenesis in yeast: links to growth and stress signals. Biochem Soc Trans 49, 1589–1599 (2021). 10.1042/bst20201136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.McLellan C. A. et al. Inhibiting GPI anchor biosynthesis in fungi stresses the endoplasmic reticulum and enhances immunogenicity. ACS Chemical Biology 7, 1520–1528 (2012). 10.1021/cb300235m [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Guo S. et al. Disrupted glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchoring induces ER stress and restricts enterovirus infection. PLoS Pathog 21, e1013685 (2025). 10.1371/journal.ppat.1013685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gonen N., Meller A., Sabath N. & Shalgi R. Amino acid biosynthesis regulation during endoplasmic reticulum stress is coupled to protein expression demands. iScience 19, 204–213 (2019). 10.1016/j.isci.2019.07.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Richie D. L. et al. A role for the unfolded protein response (UPR) in virulence and antifungal susceptibility in Aspergillus fumigatus. PLOS Pathogens 5, e1000258 (2009). 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Krysan D. The cell wall and endoplasmic reticulum stress responses are coordinately regulated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Communicative & Integrative Biology 2, 233–235 (2009). 10.4161/cib.2.3.8097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Scrimale T., Didone L., de Mesy Bentley K. L. & Krysan D. J. The unfolded protein response is induced by the cell wall integrity mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascade and is required for cell wall integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 20, 164–175 (2009). 10.1091/mbc.e08-08-0809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Montibus M., Pinson-Gadais L., Richard-Forget F., Barreau C. & Ponts N. Coupling of transcriptional response to oxidative stress and secondary metabolism regulation in filamentous fungi. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 41, 295–308 (2015). 10.3109/1040841X.2013.829416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Valiante V. The cell wall integrity signaling pathway and its involvement in secondary metabolite production. Journal of Fungi 3, 68 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Fleißner A. & Herzog S. Signal exchange and integration during self-fusion in filamentous fungi. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 57, 76–83 (2016). 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.03.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Palma-Guerrero J., Leeder A. C., Welch J. & Glass N. L. Identification and characterization of LFD1, a novel protein involved in membrane merger during cell fusion in Neurospora crassa. Molecular Microbiology 92, 164–182 (2014). 10.1111/mmi.12545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Okabe T. et al. BiFC-based visualisation system reveals cell fusion morphology and heterokaryon incompatibility in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Scientific Reports 8, 2922 (2018). 10.1038/s41598-018-21323-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Fontaine T. & Latgé J.-P. Galactomannan produced by Aspergillus fumigatus: An update on the structure, biosynthesis and biological functions of an emblematic fungal biomarker. Journal of Fungi 6, 283 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Fu C., Ao J., Dettmann A., Seiler S. & Free S. J. Characterization of the Neurospora crassa cell fusion proteins, HAM-6, HAM-7, HAM-8, HAM-9, HAM-10, AMPH-1 and WHI-2. PLOS ONE 9, e107773 (2014). 10.1371/journal.pone.0107773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Maddi A., Dettman A., Fu C., Seiler S. & Free S. J. WSC-1 and HAM-7 are MAK-1 MAP kinase pathway sensors required for cell wall integrity and hyphal fusion in Neurospora crassa. PLOS ONE 7, e42374 (2012). 10.1371/journal.pone.0042374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kitamoto K. Molecular biology of the Koji molds. Advances in applied microbiology 51, 129–154 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Waterhouse A. M., Procter J. B., Martin D. M. A., Clamp M. & Barton G. J. Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25, 1189–1191 (2009). 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Mörsky P. & Aine E. Determination of lysozyme in tears by immunoturbidimetric and optimised kinetic bacteriolytic methods. Clinica Chimica Acta 129, 201–209 (1983). 10.1016/0009-8981(83)90217-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Noelting G. & Bernfeld P. On amylolytic enzymes; beta-amylase; activity assay and control of the absence of alpha-amylase. Helv Chim Acta 31, 286–290 (1948). 10.1002/hlca.19480310149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Miller G. L. Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugar. Analytical Chemistry 31, 426–428 (1959). 10.1021/ac60147a030 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hill T. W. & Kafer E. Improved protocols for Aspergillus minimal medium: trace element and minimal medium salt stock solutions. Fungal Genetics Reports 48, 20–21 (2001). 10.4148/1941-4765.1173 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Schneider C. A., Rasband W. S. & Eliceiri K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods 9, 671–675 (2012). 10.1038/nmeth.2089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wucherpfennig T., Hestler T. & Krull R. Morphology engineering--osmolality and its effect on Aspergillus niger morphology and productivity. Microb Cell Fact 10, 58 (2011). 10.1186/1475-2859-10-58 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hou G., Yan S., Trebosc J., Amoureux J.-P. & Polenova T. Broadband homonuclear correlation spectroscopy driven by combined R2nv sequences under fast magic angle spinning for NMR structural analysis of organic and biological solids. J. Magn. Reson. 232, 18–30 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Lu X., Guo C., Hou G. & Polenova T. Combined zero-quantum and spin-diffusion mixing for efficient homonuclear correlation spectroscopy under fast MAS: broadband recoupling and detection of long-range correlations. J. Biomol. NMR 61, 7–20 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Cadars S. et al. The refocused INADEQUATE MAS NMR experiment in multiple spin-systems: Interpreting observed correlation peaks and optimising lineshapes. J. Magn. Reson. 188, 24–34 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Lesage A., Bardet M. & Emsley L. Through-bond carbon– carbon connectivities in disordered solids by NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 10987–10993 (1999). [Google Scholar]
- 77.FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/, 2010).
- 78.Trim Galore: A wrapper tool around Cutadapt and FastQC to consistently apply quality and adapter trimming to FastQ files, with some extra functionality for MspI-digested RRBS-type (Reduced Representation Bisufite-Seq) libraries. (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/, 2015).
- 79.Kim D., Paggi J. M., Park C., Bennett C. & Salzberg S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nature Biotechnology 37, 907–915 (2019). 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Liao Y., Smyth G. K. & Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014). 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Danecek P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 10 (2021). 10.1093/gigascience/giab008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Love M. I., Huber W. & Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology 15, 550 (2014). 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Benjamini Y. & Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 57, 289–300 (1995). 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ashburner M. et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics 25, 25–29 (2000). 10.1038/75556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Consortium T. G. O. The Gene Ontology knowledgebase in 2026. Nucleic Acids Research 54, D1779–D1792 (2026). 10.1093/nar/gkaf1292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Wu T. et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. The Innovation 2, 100141 (2021). 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Supek F., Bošnjak M., Škunca N. & Šmuc T. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS One 6, e21800 (2011). 10.1371/journal.pone.0021800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Hadley W. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. (Springer-Verlag; New York, 2016). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







