Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1985 Jul;48(1):93–109. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(85)83763-2

The magnetic field of a single axon. A comparison of theory and experiment.

B J Roth, J P Wikswo Jr
PMCID: PMC1329380  PMID: 4016213

Abstract

The magnetic field and the transmembrane action potential of a single nerve axon were measured simultaneously. The volume conductor model was used to calculate the magnetic field from the measured action potential, allowing comparison of the model predictions with the experimental data. After analyzing the experiment for all systematic errors, we conclude that the shape of the magnetic field can be accurately predicted from the transmembrane potential and, more importantly, the shape of the transmembrane potential can be calculated from the magnetic field. The data are used to determine ri, the internal resistance per unit length of the axon, to be 19.3 +/- 1.9 k omega mm-1, implying a value for the internal conductivity of 1.44 +/- 0.33 omega -1 m-1. Magnetic measurements are compared with standard bioelectric techniques for studying nerve axons.

Full text

PDF
96

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. GELERNTER H. L., SWIHART J. C. A MATHEMATICAL-PHYSICAL MODEL OF THE GENESIS OF THE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM. Biophys J. 1964 Jul;4:285–301. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(64)86783-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. KAO C. Y. Postsynaptic electrogenesis in septate giant axons. II. Comparison of medial and lateral giant axons of crayfish. J Neurophysiol. 1960 Nov;23:618–635. doi: 10.1152/jn.1960.23.6.618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Plonsey R., Heppner D. B. Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. Bull Math Biophys. 1967 Dec;29(4):657–664. doi: 10.1007/BF02476917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Stegeman D. F., de Weerd J. P., Eijkman E. G. A volume conductor study of compound action potentials of nerves in situ: the forward problem. Biol Cybern. 1979 Jun;33(2):97–111. doi: 10.1007/BF00355258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. WATANABE A., GRUNDFEST H. Impulse propagation at the septal and commissural junctions of crayfish lateral giant axons. J Gen Physiol. 1961 Nov;45:267–308. doi: 10.1085/jgp.45.2.267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wikswo J. P., Jr Improved instrumentation for measuring the magnetic field of cellular action currents. Rev Sci Instrum. 1982 Dec;53(12):1846–1850. doi: 10.1063/1.1136908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wikswo J. P., Jr, Samson P. C., Giffard R. P. A low-noise low input impedance amplifier for magnetic measurements of nerve action currents. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1983 Apr;30(4):215–221. doi: 10.1109/tbme.1983.325220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES