Abstract
Lavandula dentata is a medicinal and aromatic plant rich in specialised secondary metabolites, but the biomedical potential of leaf-surface metabolites recovered from pruning biomass remains poorly investigated. In this study, a pruning-derived leaf-surface extract of L. dentata was obtained by brief acetone immersion followed by n-hexane partitioning. Its chemical profile was investigated by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry analysis combined with feature-based molecular networking, which revealed an enrichment in methoxylated flavonoids and pentacyclic triterpenes, including oleanane- and ursane-like derivatives. The biological activity of the extract was evaluated in HCT116 colorectal cancer cells, MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer cells, and HaCaT keratinocytes. After 24 h treatment, the extract selectively reduced HCT116 cell viability in a concentration-dependent manner, with an IC50 of 27.8 ± 1.049 μg/mL, whereas MDA-MB-231 and HaCaT cells were less sensitive. Mechanistic analyses in HCT116 cells showed increased early and late apoptotic populations, mitochondrial membrane depolarisation, and enhanced cleavage of caspase-9, caspase-3, and PARP. These findings indicate that a chemically profiled L. dentata leaf-surface extract selectively impairs colorectal cancer cell survival by activating mitochondria-mediated apoptosis. The study also supports the valorisation of pruning-derived aromatic plant biomass as a source of bioactive natural products with potential biomedical relevance.
Keywords: Lavandula dentata, leaf-surface extract, pruning residues, methoxylated flavonoids, mitochondria-mediated apoptosis, colon cancer cells
1. Introduction
Cancer remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide and continues to represent a major public health burden despite substantial advances in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment [1,2,3]. Conventional anticancer therapies often show limited selectivity for malignant cells and may be associated with dose-limiting toxicity and the development of resistance, thereby sustaining the search for new agents with improved efficacy and safety profiles [4,5]. In this context, plant molecules constitute a key reservoir of structurally diverse bioactive compounds that can modulate multiple cellular pathways implicated in carcinogenesis, tumour progression, and treatment resistance [6,7,8].
Among medicinal and aromatic plants, the genus Lavandula (Lamiaceae) has attracted growing interest because of its long-standing traditional use and its richness in terpenoid and phenolic constituents with documented biological activities [9,10,11]. Lavandula dentata L. (French lavender) is widely cultivated in Mediterranean and semi-arid regions as an ornamental and aromatic shrub, and its aerial parts have traditionally been used for the relief of gastrointestinal disturbances, headache, rheumatic pain, and symptoms associated with nervous tension [9,12]. Experimental studies on Lavandula species, including L. dentata, have reported antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties for essential oils and plant extracts, thus reinforcing the pharmacological relevance of this taxon [9,10,13,14,15,16].
Phytochemical studies indicate that L. dentata produces essential oils rich in oxygenated monoterpenes, including 1,8-cineole, together with a range of other terpenoids and non-volatile phenolic compounds, such as phenolic acids and flavonoids [13,14,15,17,18,19]. This chemical profile is of particular interest in oncology because several terpenoid and phenolics have been associated with cytotoxic, pro-apoptotic, antiproliferative, and redox-modulating effects in tumour models. Preliminary in vitro evidence suggests that selected L. dentata preparations may exert cytotoxic activity against human cancer cell lines, supporting further investigation of this species as a source of bioactive candidates [19,20,21,22,23,24,25].
However, important gaps remain in the current evidence base. Most published studies on L. dentata have focused on crude extracts or essential oils obtained from whole organs or aerial parts, whereas the contribution of metabolites specifically associated with leaf surfaces and glandular trichomes remains comparatively underexplored [14,15,17,18]. This distinction may be biologically relevant because glandular trichomes are major sites of accumulation and secretion of specialised metabolites in Lamiaceae, and surface-oriented extraction may therefore yield preparations that differ substantially from conventional whole-tissue extracts in both composition and bioactivity [18,26]. In addition, although cytotoxic effects have been reported for some L. dentata preparations, the currently available evidence remains limited for defining their selectivity towards malignant versus non-transformed cells, since only a small number of studies appear to assess these effects through explicit parallel in vitro comparison models [19,20,25].
In parallel with the increasing demand for plant-derived ingredients in the pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and cosmetic sectors, growing attention has been directed towards the sustainable valorisation of agricultural and horticultural by-products. In Lavandula cultivation, pruning is routinely performed to maintain plant architecture, revitalise plants, and stimulate regrowth and flowering, generating biomass that may represent an underexploited source of secondary metabolites [9,27]. From a bioprospecting perspective, converting pruning residues into chemically characterised extracts is an attractive strategy to combine waste valorisation with the discovery of bioactive molecules. This rationale is supported by recent work highlighting the resource-efficient exploitation of residues from medicinal and aromatic plants and by studies specifically investigating essential oils and by-products obtained from lavender pruning residues [28,29]. Moreover, targeting superficial tissues and glandular secretory structures may be particularly relevant in Lamiaceae as these compartments are enriched in specialised metabolites and contribute significantly to the phytochemical profile of Lavandula species [11,26].
On this basis, the present study aimed to valorise L. dentata pruning waste by producing a chemically profiled leaf-surface extract (LVD) and assessing its anticancer potential through a comparative in vitro approach. Specifically, the objectives were: (i) to characterise the chemical composition of LVD, with emphasis on metabolite classes plausibly related to biological activity; and (ii) to evaluate its cytotoxic effects in human tumour and non-tumour cell models (HCT116 colorectal carcinoma cells, MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer cells, and HaCaT immortalised keratinocytes) in order to obtain preliminary evidence of biological activity and differential sensitivity between tumour and non-tumour cell models.
2. Results
2.1. Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (UHPLC-HR-MS) Analysis
UHPLC-HR-Orbitrap/ESI-MS analyses and MN (Molecular Network) were performed on LVD. The results showed several clusters with compounds belonging to triterpene class, characterised by a C30 skeleton and molecular masses within the range of 425–489 g/mol (Figure 1). The tentative identification based on literature data was complicated due to the occurrence of several isomers and few literature information making it difficult to discriminate among already isolated molecules and compounds not yet described. On the other hand, MN strategy can help us to understand the complex mixture of extract that contain a large number of metabolites. Within the MN, each containing multiple nodes with closely related mass spectra were characterised by features indicative of triterpene structures, in terms of fragmentation patterns and predicted molecular formulae. In the MN2 cluster was present 7 parent ions at m/z between 285.0757 from 315.0862 attributable to mono-methoxylated flavonoids; these compounds showed loss at 15 Da corresponding to methyl group (-CH3). In the same way, MN3 cluster showed parent ion at m/z between 329.1015 from 345.0964 attributable to tri-methoxylated flavonoids, these ions showed 3 times the loss of 15 Da. These compounds were interesting for their proved biological activity and medicine application. The cluster MN4 indicated the presence of triterpene characterised by aldehyde group; MS2 shows typical loss of –CHO (29 Da), at m/z 441.3727. Unlike the MN5-6-7-8-9-10 clusters, which exhibit typical fragmentation patterns attributable to ursolic and oleanolic acid derivatives. The m/z values of these clusters range from 453 to 489 depending on the number of oxygen atoms linked to the C30 skeleton. They exhibit losses that are typical of hydroxyl (-(H2O)n) and carboxyl (CO2) groups. Furthermore, the presence of fragments at m/z 249 (C16H25O2+, directly originated from the RDA fragmentation of [M+H]+), 208 (C14H24O, directly originated from the RDA fragmentation of [M+H]+), 203 and 191 (respectively C15H23+ and C14H23+ were observed from the RDA fragmentation of [M+H−H2O]+ and [M+H−2H2O−CO]+) is indicative of the fragmentation of the C30 skeleton of ursolic and oleanolic acids, (Table 1) [30]. In particular, the fragments at 249 and 208 Da are diagnostic to elucidate the presence in C3 of hydroxyl group or carbonyl group in olean and ursan derivatives. On the other hand, MN1 presents mono-oxygenated triterpenoid, with a peak attributable to molecules such as β-amyrin and lupeol at m/z 427.3934. Figure 2 shows the peaks that correspond to the different clusters that were identified using GNPS2 (version 2026.05.21). These results suggest that the L. dentata extract contains large numbers of methoxylated flavonoids and triterpenes, which are known for their biological activities [31], as these clusters account for a large proportion of the peaks present in the chromatogram.
Figure 1.
Feature-based molecular network of the pruning-derived leaf-surface extract of Lavandula dentata generated using GNPS2. Selected clusters putatively annotated as methoxylated flavonoids and pentacyclic triterpenes are highlighted. Numbered and circled regions identify the principal molecular families discussed in the text, including lupeol/β-amyrin-related nodes and triterpene clusters tentatively assigned as oleanan- and ursan-like derivatives.
Table 1.
Mass spectra data (positive ion mode) of compounds detected and tentatively identified in LVD extract.
| Peak | Compound | Rt | [M+H+]+ | MS2 | MSI * |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dihydroxydimethoxyflavone | 14.38 | 315.0858 | 300; 282; 255 | 2 |
| 2 | Dihydroxymethoxyflavanone | 16.32 | 287.0905 | 269; 245; 227; 167; 147 | 2 |
| 3 | 7-Methoxyapigenin | 16.68 | 285.0752 | 270; 242; 167; 174 | 1 |
| 4 | 4′-Methoxyapigenin | 17.09 | 285.0752 | 270; 242; 167; 174 | 1 |
| 5 | Dihydroxytrimethoxyflavone | 18.78 | 345.0961 | 330; 312; 281; 241; 213 | 2 |
| 6 | Triterpene C30H46O4 | 21.91 | 471.3460 | 452; 434; 392; 287; 213; 179 | 3 |
| 7 | 4′-7-dimethoxyapigenin | 22.95 | 299.0903 | 284; 256; 194; 167; 149 | 1 |
| 8 | Triterpene C30H48O4 | 24.98 | 471.3460 | 452; 434; 392; 287; 213; 179 | 1 |
| 9 | Tormentic acid | 26.27 | 489.3574 | 471; 443; 407; 201; 189 | 1 |
| 10 | Triterpene C30H46O4 | 28.06 | 471.3460 | 452; 434; 392; 287; 213; 179 | 3 |
| 11 | Triterpene C30H46O4 | 29.11 | 471.3460 | 452; 434; 392; 287; 213; 179 | 3 |
| 12 | Triterpene C30H48O4 | 29.43 | 473.3625 | 427; 409; 391; 357; 249; 208; 201; 189 | 3 |
| 13 | Triterpene C30H48O4 | 31.51 | 473.3625 | 427; 409; 391; 357; 249; 208; 201; 189 | 3 |
| 14 | 3β-hydroxyoleanan-28-oic acid | 31.84 | 459.3832 | 441; 423; 413; 395; 205 | 1 |
| 15 | Triterpene C30H48O4 | 31.95 | 473.3625 | 427; 409; 391; 357; 249; 208; 201; 189 | 3 |
| 16 | Triterpene C30H46O3 | 32.18 | 455.3533 | 437; 409; 259; 203; 289; 177 | 3 |
| 17 | Triterpene C30H46O3 | 32.54 | 455.3533 | 437; 409; 259; 203; 289; 177 | 3 |
| 18 | Triterpene C30H48O2 | 32.96 | 439.3561 | 393; 315; 297; 203; 191; 189 | 3 |
| 19 | Triterpene C30H48O2 | 33.47 | 439.3561 | 393; 315; 297; 203; 191; 189 | 3 |
| 21 | Oleanolic acid | 33.44 | 457.3676 | 439; 411; 393; 235; 203; 1991 | 1 |
| 21 | Triterpene C30H48O2 | 34.31 | 439.3561 | 393; 315; 297; 203; 191; 189 | 3 |
| 22 | Ursolic acid | 34.31 | 457.3676 | 439; 411; 393; 235; 203; 1991 | 1 |
| 23 | Triterpene C30H46O3 | 36.87 | 455.3533 | 437; 409; 259; 203; 289; 177 | 3 |
| 24 | Olean-12-en-20-al | 37.35 | 525.3777 | 407; 217; 203; 191; 189 | 1 |
| 25 | 20,28-dihydroxylupan-3-one | 39.52 | 459.3832 | 441; 423; 405; 219; 207 | 1 |
| 26 | Lupeol | 41.54 | 427.3934 | 409; 229; 191; 189 | 1 |
* MSI level of identification according to Sumner et al., 2007 [32].
Figure 2.
Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry chromatogram of the pruning-derived leaf-surface extract of L. dentata. Coloured peak regions correspond to the principal molecular networking clusters identified in Figure 1 (MN1, MN12, MN3, MN4+5, MN6, MN7+8, and MN9+10).
2.2. Differential Sensitivity of HCT116, MDA-MB-231, and HaCaT Cells to LVD
The effect of LVD on cell viability was evaluated in the human tumour cell lines HCT116 and MDA-MB-231, as well as in the non-tumour human keratinocyte cell line HaCaT, over the concentration range 0.1–55.5 μg/mL. Cells were exposed to the LVD extract for 24 h, and viability was assessed by crystal violet staining. As shown in Figure 3A, LVD induced a marked concentration-dependent reduction in HCT116 cell viability. No substantial effect was observed at 0.1 and 1 μg/mL, whereas viability progressively decreased from 5.5 μg/mL onward, with statistically significant reductions at 10 and 17.5 μg/mL. At 30 μg/mL, viability was reduced to 49%, and it further declined to about 21% at 55.5 μg/mL. Consistent with this response, the IC50 value for HCT116 cells was 27.8 ± 1.049 μg/mL. In contrast, MDA-MB-231 cells were less sensitive to LVD (Figure 3B). Cell viability remained close to control values up to 17.5 μg/mL, and a significant decrease was observed only at higher concentrations. At 30 μg/mL, viability remained around 84%, while at 55.5 μg/mL it decreased to 48%. Accordingly, the IC50 value for MDA-MB-231 cells was 54.1 ± 1.044 μg/mL. A similar concentration-dependent response was observed in HaCaT cells (Figure 3C). Viability was not significantly affected up to 30 μg/mL and remained close to control levels throughout this concentration range. At the highest tested concentration, 55.5 μg/mL, LVD induced a marked reduction in viability, to approximately 31%. Consistent with this observation, the IC50 value for HaCaT cells was 50.4 ± 1.057 μg/mL. Overall, these results indicate that HCT116 cells were the most sensitive to LVD treatment under the experimental conditions tested, whereas MDA-MB-231 and HaCaT cells showed lower and broadly comparable sensitivity. Based on these findings, HCT116 cells were selected for subsequent mechanistic studies, including Annexin V/PI apoptosis assay, JC-1 staining, and Western blotting.
Figure 3.
Effects of LVD on cell viability in HCT116, MDA-MB-231 and HaCaT cells. Cells were treated with increasing concentrations of LVD (0.1–55.5 μg/mL) for 24 h, and cell viability was evaluated by crystal violet staining. Viability is reported on a 0–100% scale, where vehicle-treated cells (Ctrl) were set at 100% and 20% DMSO was used as the full-kill control. (A) HCT116 cells displayed a marked concentration-dependent decrease in viability. (B) MDA-MB-231 cells were less sensitive to LVD, with significant effects detected only at higher concentrations. (C) HaCaT cells were the least sensitive, showing reduced viability only at the highest concentration tested. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent biological experiments, each performed with six technical replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using Brown–Forsythe and Welch ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple-comparison test. Statistical significance compared with control is indicated as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and **** p < 0.0001.
2.3. LVD Induces Concentration-Dependent Morphological Changes in HCT116 Cells
Representative phase-contrast images showed that LVD induced concentration-dependent morphological changes in HCT116 cells (Figure 4). Untreated control cells displayed the typical morphology of adherent HCT116 cells, with a relatively dense epithelial-like monolayer and preserved cell–cell contacts. Cells exposed to the lowest concentrations of LVD, 0.1 and 1 µg/mL, appeared largely comparable to control cells, although a slight reduction in confluence and monolayer compactness was detectable. At 5.5 µg/mL, the monolayer appeared less compact, with reduced cell density and partial loss of intercellular contacts. These alterations became more evident at 10 and 17.5 µg/mL, where cells showed a clear decrease in confluence, increased cell rounding, and areas of partial detachment. At the highest concentrations tested, 30 and 55.5 µg/mL, LVD produced marked morphological alterations, characterised by a pronounced reduction in adherent cell density, disruption of the monolayer, increased numbers of rounded or detached cells, and the presence of cellular debris. Overall, these morphological changes are consistent with a concentration-dependent cytotoxic effect of LVD on HCT116 cells.
Figure 4.
Concentration-dependent morphological changes induced by LVD in HCT116 cells. Representative phase-contrast images of HCT116 cells treated with increasing concentrations of LVD (0.1–55.5 µg/mL) are shown alongside untreated control cells (Ctrl). Control cells formed a dense, epithelial-like monolayer with preserved cell–cell contacts. LVD treatment caused progressive morphological changes, including reduced confluence, altered cell shape, increased cell rounding, partial loss of adhesion, and, at the highest concentrations, a marked reduction in adherent cell density with increased numbers of detached cells and cellular debris. Images are representative of independent experiments. Contrast and brightness were adjusted equally across all images for better visibility. Scale bars represent 100 µm.
2.4. LVD Triggers Apoptotic Cell Death in HCT116 Cells
To determine whether the cytotoxic effect of LVD was associated with apoptosis induction, HCT116 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of LVD (0.5 × IC50, 1 × IC50, and 1.5 × IC50) for 24 h and analysed by flow cytometry using Annexin V/PI staining. As shown by the representative dot plots (Figure 5A) and the corresponding quantitative analysis (Figure 5B), LVD markedly reduced the viable cell population and increased the proportion of apoptotic cells compared with untreated controls. In control cells, the viable population accounted for 85.6%, whereas early apoptotic, late apoptotic, and necrotic cells represented 7.5%, 5.75%, and 1.13%, respectively. Treatment with 0.5 × IC50 LVD reduced the viable fraction to 68.4% and increased the early and late apoptotic populations to 11.3% and 17.2%, respectively, while necrotic cells remained limited (3.10%). Exposure to 1 × IC50 LVD produced a more pronounced effect, with viable cells decreasing to 44.2%, accompanied by a marked rise in both early apoptosis (26.5%) and late apoptosis (26.9%); necrosis remained low (2.45%). At 1.5 × IC50, the viable fraction remained markedly reduced (47.2%), while early apoptotic cells further increased to 31.2% and late apoptotic cells accounted for 18.7% of the total population; necrotic cells again represented only a minor fraction (3.01%). Overall, these findings indicate that LVD primarily induces apoptotic rather than necrotic cell death. When total apoptosis was calculated as the sum of early and late apoptotic cells, the overall apoptotic fraction increased from 13.25% in control cells to 28.5%, 53.4%, and 49.9% following treatment with 0.5 × IC50, 1 × IC50, and 1.5 × IC50 LVD, respectively (Figure 5B). To further investigate the involvement of mitochondrial dysfunction in LVD-induced apoptosis, mitochondrial membrane potential was evaluated by JC-1 staining. This analysis was performed qualitatively, based on the visual assessment of fluorescence signal distribution. As shown in Figure 5C, untreated cells exhibited predominantly red fluorescence, consistent with polarised and functionally intact mitochondria. By contrast, cells treated with LVD at the IC50 concentration showed a clear increase in green fluorescence together with a reduction in red signal, indicating mitochondrial membrane depolarisation. Consistent with these findings, Western blot analysis revealed a marked increase in the levels of cleaved caspase-9, cleaved caspase-3, and cleaved PARP in LVD-treated cells compared with control cells (Figure 5D). Densitometric quantification confirmed a significant increase in all three apoptotic markers following treatment (Figure 5E). Taken together, these results indicate that LVD triggers mitochondria-mediated apoptosis, leading to caspase activation and PARP cleavage.
Figure 5.
LVD induces apoptosis in HCT116 cells. (A) HCT116 cells were treated with LVD at 0.5 × IC50, 1 × IC50, and 1.5 × IC50 for 24 h. Apoptosis was then assessed by flow cytometry using Annexin V/PI staining. Representative dot plots are shown, and the percentage of cells is indicated in each quadrant: viable cells, lower left; necrotic cells, upper left; early apoptotic cells, lower right; and late apoptotic cells, upper right. (B) Quantitative analysis of flow-cytometry data showing the distribution of viable, early apoptotic, late apoptotic, and necrotic cells after treatment with LVD. Statistical analysis of Annexin V/PI data was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test. (C) HCT116 cells were treated with LVD at the IC50 concentration for 24 h, and changes in mitochondrial membrane potential were evaluated by JC-1 staining. Representative images are shown. Red fluorescence indicates mitochondrial polarisation, whereas green fluorescence indicates depolarisation. (D) Cell lysates from HCT116 cells treated with LVD for 24 h were analysed by Western blotting (Figure S1) for cleaved caspase-9, cleaved caspase-3, and cleaved PARP expression. β-Actin was used as the loading control. (E) Densitometric analysis of the protein bands shown in panel D. Signal intensities were expressed in arbitrary units after normalisation to β-actin. Densitometric comparisons between treated and control cells were analysed using Student’s t-test. Data were obtained from three independent biological experiments. Statistical significance was defined as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001.
3. Discussion
The present study demonstrates that the n-hexane-soluble leaf-surface extract of Lavandula dentata (LVD) exerts cytotoxic activity with differential sensitivity across the tested cell models, showing greater activity against HCT116 colorectal cancer cells than against MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells and non-tumour HaCaT keratinocytes. This differential sensitivity represents one of the main findings of the study, since LVD reduced HCT116 viability in a clear concentration-dependent manner, with an IC50 of 27.8 ± 1.049 μg/mL after 24 h, whereas higher IC50 values were observed in MDA-MB-231 and HaCaT cells, namely 54.1 ± 1.044 μg/mL and 50.4 ± 1.057 μg/mL, respectively. Overall, these data indicate that LVD does not behave as a broadly non-specific toxic mixture but rather contains bioactive constituents with greater activity toward HCT116 colorectal tumour cells under the experimental conditions tested.
The phytochemical profile of LVD provides a basis for this biological activity. Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–HRMS), combined with feature-based molecular networking, revealed that the extract is enriched in triterpenes and methoxylated flavonoids, including compounds tentatively assigned to lupeol- or β-amyrin-related skeleton, aldehyde-containing triterpenes, as well as several ursolic and oleanolic acid derivatives. These classes of natural products are known for their anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic properties in several cancer models, including colorectal cancer. In particular, oleanolic acid has been reported to exert antiproliferative effects in HCT116 cells [33], while ursolic acid and its derivatives have also shown relevant activity in colorectal cancer models [34,35]. Likewise, lupeol has been described as an active anticancer compound in several colorectal cancer settings [36,37]. In addition, triterpene- and flavonoid-rich extracts from other Lavandula species, such as L. stoechas, have been associated with marked anticancer activity [38], further supporting the biological relevance of this phytochemical combination.
The greater sensitivity of HCT116 cells compared with MDA-MB-231 cells likely reflects differences in tumour type and intracellular signalling dependencies. HCT116 cells harbour oncogenic KRAS and retain wild-type p53, a molecular background known to favour apoptotic engagement under cytotoxic stress and discussed as a privileged therapeutic axis in colorectal cancer [39,40]. By contrast, MDA-MB-231 cells are representative of triple-negative breast cancer, a subtype characterised by high intrinsic resistance linked to strong activation of PI3K/AKT, MAPK, and NF-κB pro-survival pathways, as highlighted in recent reviews on triple-negative breast tumours and phyto-derived agents [41,42,43]. Although these mechanisms were not directly investigated here, the differential response observed in the present study is consistent with the distinct biological vulnerabilities of the two cell lines. Moreover, the higher sensitivity of HCT116 cells is in line with previous evidence showing that colorectal cancer cells are susceptible to triterpene-induced apoptosis mediated by ursolic acid, oleanolic acid, and related derivatives [33,34,35]. The limited impact of LVD on HaCaT cells up to 30 µg/mL further strengthens the relevance of the observed selectivity, suggesting a favourable in vitro therapeutic window, in agreement with studies that use HaCaT as a non-tumour reference line to define selectivity indices for natural compounds [44,45].
Morphological observations were fully consistent with the viability data. Phase-contrast microscopy showed a concentration-dependent transition from a dense, adherent epithelial-like monolayer to progressive loss of confluence, cell rounding, detachment, and accumulation of cellular debris in LVD-treated HCT116 cells. These alterations are consistent with the morphological features commonly associated with apoptosis induced by plant-derived cytotoxic agents. Similar changes have been described for L. dentata ethanolic extracts in MCF-7 cells, where cell shrinkage, rounding, and apoptotic bodies were observed together with DNA fragmentation and Annexin V positivity [20]. Comparable effects have also been reported for L. angustifolia essential oil in HNO210 laryngeal carcinoma cells, which showed reduced cell density, rounding, loss of intercellular contacts, and disruption of the monolayer [46], as well as for L. angustifolia extracts in HeLa and MCF-7 cells [25], for L. stoechas flower ethanolic extract in HT-29 colorectal cancer cells [47], and for triterpene- and polyphenol-rich preparations in other tumour models [37,48]. Therefore, the progressive accumulation of rounded and detached cells at higher LVD concentrations is in good agreement with the marked reduction in viability detected by crystal violet staining.
Mechanistically, our findings indicate that LVD induces apoptosis in HCT116 cells predominantly through a regulated cell death program rather than through primary necrosis. Annexin V/PI analysis revealed a concentration-dependent decrease in the viable cell population, accompanied by a parallel increase in both early and late apoptotic cells, while the necrotic fraction remained limited. These data support apoptosis as the main mechanism underlying the cytotoxic effect of LVD. Notably, although early apoptosis further increased at 1.5 × IC50, the proportion of late apoptotic cells was lower than that observed at 1 × IC50. This pattern may reflect differences in apoptotic kinetics at the 24 h time point, since Annexin V/PI analysis performed at a fixed endpoint captures the distribution of cells across different stages of apoptotic progression [49,50]. Consistent with this interpretation, total apoptosis remained markedly increased at both concentrations. This conclusion was further strengthened by JC-1 staining, which showed a marked loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, indicating mitochondrial depolarisation as an early event in the response to LVD. Since collapse of mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) is a hallmark of intrinsic apoptosis and generally precedes caspase-9 activation and downstream executioner caspase signalling, these findings strongly support the involvement of a mitochondria-mediated apoptotic pathway [51,52,53,54]. Western blot analysis confirmed this scenario, showing that LVD markedly increased the levels of cleaved caspase-9, cleaved caspase-3, and cleaved PARP, thereby providing robust biochemical evidence of activation of the canonical intrinsic caspase cascade downstream of mitochondrial dysfunction.
Our results are also consistent with previous reports showing that Lavandula-derived preparations can promote caspase-dependent apoptosis in tumour cells. For example, lavandin essential oil induces dose-dependent Annexin V/PI-positive apoptosis and caspase-3 activation in HL-60 leukaemia cells, whereas the flower ethanolic extract of L. stoechas shifts HT-29 colorectal cancer cells from viability toward early and late apoptotic populations while increasing TP53 and CASP3 expression [47,55]. However, those studies did not systematically assess mitochondrial membrane potential. The present data therefore extend this body of evidence by demonstrating that a leaf-surface extract of L. dentata, enriched in triterpenes and methoxylated flavonoids, activates a mitochondria-mediated apoptotic programme in HCT116 cells. This response is characterised by the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), together with the cleavage of caspase-9, caspase-3, and PARP. This mechanistic profile is also coherent with the phytochemical composition of LVD. Pentacyclic triterpenes such as oleanolic acid, ursolic acid, and lupeol have been widely reported to induce mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells through modulation of signalling pathways including Akt/GSK3β, Hippo, NF-κB, and Wnt/β-catenin [33,34,56]. The flavonoid fraction may also contribute to this effect, since methoxylated flavonoids have been associated with redox imbalance, mitochondrial perturbation, and caspase-dependent apoptosis in tumour cells [57,58]. In colorectal cancer models, flavonoid-induced cell death is frequently linked to ROS accumulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and activation of apoptotic execution pathways [59]. Although ROS levels were not measured here, the coexistence of methoxylated flavonoids and triterpenoid constituents in LVD suggests a multitarget phytochemical system in which distinct metabolite classes converge on mitochondrial damage and irreversible apoptotic commitment. Overall, these findings indicate that the antitumour effect of LVD in HCT116 cells is best interpreted as the consequence of a chemically complex yet mechanistically coherent phytochemical matrix enriched in triterpenes and methoxylated flavonoids. Rather than producing non-specific toxicity, LVD appears to preferentially impair colorectal cancer cell survival by promoting mitochondrial depolarisation and activation of the intrinsic apoptotic machinery.
From a broader perspective, an additional strength of this study lies in its sustainability dimension. LVD was obtained from pruning-derived L. dentata biomass, supporting the growing interest in the valorisation of aromatic plant by-products as sources of high-value secondary metabolites. Recent studies on lavender and other Lamiaceae residues have shown that pruning-derived or post-distillation biomass can retain significant amounts of bioactive non-volatile compounds, particularly phenolics and other specialised metabolites [28,60]. In this context, the present work not only identifies a biologically active extract but also supports a circular-economy approach in which underutilised agricultural residues are converted into phytochemically characterised preparations with pharmacological potential.
Several limitations should, however, be acknowledged. First, phytochemical annotation of LVD remains tentative and is based on UHPLC-HR-MS fragmentation and molecular networking; isolation and full structural elucidation of the major constituents are still required, particularly for highly isomeric pentacyclic triterpenes, as highlighted by detailed mass spectrometry fragmentation studies [30,61,62]. Second, because the plant material was collected from a single geographical area and at a single time point, inter-batch, seasonal, and inter-year variability of the extract could not be assessed in the present study. Future work should therefore include independent collections from different harvest periods, years, and/or locations to evaluate the reproducibility of the phytochemical profile and biological activity of LVD. Third the study is restricted to in vitro conditions, and no information is yet available on pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, or antitumour efficacy in vivo, all of which are critical issues for lipophilic triterpenes such as ursolic and oleanolic acid derivatives [35]. Fourth, HaCaT cells were used as a non-malignant epithelial reference model; however, they do not represent a normal colorectal epithelial counterpart to HCT116 cells. Therefore, a direct assessment of tumour selectivity in the colorectal context will require future studies including non-transformed colon epithelial cells, enabling a more rigorous evaluation of selectivity and mechanistic responses.
These limitations also define clear future directions. Isolation and structural characterisation of the major triterpene and flavonoid constituents will be essential to identify the principal active components and to explore potential synergistic interactions within the extract. In addition, validation in appropriate animal models of colorectal cancer will be necessary to establish whether the selective pro-apoptotic activity observed in HCT116 cells translates into meaningful preclinical antitumour efficacy.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plant Material
Flowering aerial parts of L. dentata were collected in February 2024 at Wadi Thee Ghazal, in the Taif region, Saudi Arabia (21.094367° N, 40.379097° E). The plant material was identified by one of the authors, A. Bader. A voucher specimen (SA-IT/2024-1) was deposited in the herbarium of the Laboratory of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Jordan.
4.2. Extraction
Fresh aerial parts of L. dentata (850 g) were immersed in acetone for 30 s, as previously described [63], yielding 6.5 g of extract. The leaf-surface extract was then partitioned with n-hexane to give an n-hexane-soluble fraction (LVD, 5.5 g) and an n-hexane-insoluble fraction (1.5 g).
4.3. Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with High-Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry (UHPLC-HR-MS) Analysis
Chemical characterisation of the LVD extract was performed using an Ultimate 3000 UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Bremen, Germany), coupled with an Orbitrap Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Bremen, Germany). Before injection, the extract was dissolved in methanol and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 min at 25 °C; the clarified supernatant was then injected at 10 mg/mL. Chromatographic separation was carried out on a Luna® C18 column (150 × 2 mm, 3 µm, 100 Å; Phenomenex®, Castel Maggiore, Bologna, Italy). The mobile phase consisted of water with 0.1% v/v formic acid (phase A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% v/v formic acid (phase B). Elution started at 30% B and reached 100% B within 40 min, at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. Mass spectrometry data were acquired in both positive and negative ionisation modes, scanning from m/z 100 to 1500, using full-scan combined with data-dependent MS/MS acquisition.
4.4. Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) Data Preprocessing Parameters
Raw data files were first converted from .raw (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to .mzML format through MSConvert, part of the ProteoWizard package (version 3) (Palo Alto, CA, USA). All subsequent preprocessing steps were carried out in MZmine 4.9.14 [64]. Noise filtering during mass detection was applied using thresholds of 5 × 105 counts (MS1) and 2 × 103 counts (MS2). Chromatographic feature detection relied on the ADAP builder, with a minimum of 4 consecutive scans, intensity threshold of 5 × 105, absolute minimum height of 1 × 105, and 10 ppm m/z tolerance. Overlapping peaks were resolved with the local minimum resolver. The settings used were: chromatographic threshold 90%, minimum RT search range 0.05 min, minimum height 5 × 105, peak top/edge ratio ≥ 1.5, duration between 0.0 and 1.35 min, and at least 5 scans per feature. MS2 spectra were paired to MS1 features within a 10 ppm precursor tolerance. 13C isotopes and redundant ions were removed, and only features carrying associated MS/MS spectra were retained for downstream analysis, following the approach described in a previous study [65]. Feature lists were exported as .mgf and .csv files using the “Export molecular networking files” function.
4.5. Molecular Network Analysis
Spectral data (.mgf) and metadata (.csv) were uploaded to GNPS2 (version 2026.05.21) and analysed through the Feature-Based Molecular Networking (FBMN) workflow. Networking was built by requiring a minimum cosine score of 0.70, at least 5 matched fragment peaks, and an m/z tolerance of 0.02 Da for both precursor and fragment ions. For spectral library matching, the cosine threshold was kept at 0.70, but the minimum number of matching peaks was raised to 6 to improve annotation reliability [66].
4.6. Cell Lines and Culture Conditions
HCT116 (ATCC-CCL-247) human colorectal carcinoma cells and MDA-MB-231 (ATCC HTB-26) human triple-negative breast cancer cells were purchased from LGC Standards (Sesto San Giovanni, Milan, Italy), while HaCaT human immortalised keratinocytes were kindly provided by Dr Irma Cioccia (University of Benevento, Benevento, Italy). HCT116 cells were cultured in McCoy’s 5A medium (Euroclone, Milan, Italy), whereas MDA-MB-231 and HaCaT cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). All culture media were supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 2 mM L-glutamine (SIAL, Rome, Italy), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (SIAL, Rome, Italy). The medium was renewed every 48 h. All cell lines were routinely screened for mycoplasma contamination. Experiments were performed using HCT116 cells between passages 16 and 26, MDA-MB-231 cells between passages 9 and 20, and HaCaT cells between passages 5 and 15.
4.7. Preparation of LVD Stock Solution
For in vitro experiments, LVD was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to prepare a 40 mg/mL stock solution. To ensure maximal solubility, the solution was briefly sonicated in a water-bath sonicator for 10 min at 37 °C (LBS 1, model 616.1010.04; FALC Instruments S.r.l., Treviglio, Italy). Working concentrations were prepared by dilution in cell culture medium immediately before use. Vehicle-treated control cells received the same final concentration of DMSO as LVD-treated cells. In all experiments, the final DMSO content in culture medium did not exceed 0.1% (v/v).
4.8. Cell Viability and Morphological Analysis
Cell viability was assessed by crystal violet staining following the method of Feoktistova et al. [67], with minor modifications. HCT116, HaCaT, and MDA-MB-231 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at densities of 7 × 103, 8 × 103, and 8 × 103 cells per well, respectively, and allowed to adhere for 24 h. Cells were then treated with increasing concentrations of LVD (0.1–55.5 μg/mL) in medium containing 1% FBS for 24 h. After treatment, the medium was discarded and the cells were gently rinsed with 1× PBS, then stained and fixed with 0.5% crystal violet solution for 20 min at room temperature. Excess dye was removed by washing the wells with tap water, after which the plates were air-dried overnight (approximately 16 h) and the bound stain was dissolved in methanol. Absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader (model 680, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Results are expressed as percentage of cell viability (n = 3 independent experiments with 6 replicate wells per condition). Morphological alterations induced by LVD (0.1–55.5 μg/mL, 24 h) were also evaluated by bright-field and phase-contrast imaging using a Zoe™ Fluorescent Cell Imager (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) equipped with a 20× objective.
4.9. Apoptosis Analysis
The induction of apoptosis was evaluated by flow cytometry using an Annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) staining assay as previously described [68]. Briefly, HCT116 cells were seeded in six-well plates at a density of 4 × 105 cells/well and incubated for 24 h in the absence or presence of LVD at 0.5×, 1×, and 1.5× IC50 in medium containing 1% FBS. After treatment, cells were collected, washed twice with 1× PBS, and resuspended in Annexin V binding buffer. Samples were then stained with 2 μL Annexin V and 2 μL PI for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. Apoptotic cells were analysed using a BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San José, CA, USA), and data were processed with FlowJo V10 software (WilliamsonWay, Ashland, OR, USA).
4.10. Mitochondrial Membrane Potential
Changes in mitochondrial membrane potential were qualitatively assessed using the JC-1 fluorescent probe (MT09, Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Tokyo, Japan). This lipophilic cationic dye accumulates in mitochondria according to membrane polarisation: red fluorescence indicates mitochondrial JC-1 aggregates in polarised mitochondria, while green fluorescence indicates the monomeric form associated with membrane depolarisation. HCT116 cells were treated with LVD at the IC50 concentration for 24 h, then incubated with 5 μM JC-1 for 1 h at 37 °C in the dark. Fluorescence images were then collected with an EVOS FL Cell Imaging System (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA).
4.11. Cell Lysate Preparation
HCT116 cells were seeded in 100 mm dishes at a density of 1.5 × 106 cells per dish and allowed to attach for 24 h. The cells were then exposed to LVD at the IC50 concentration in medium containing 1% FBS for a further 24 h. Control cells were treated with equivalent amounts of DMSO, the vehicle in which LVD was dissolved. After treatment, the cells were washed twice with ice-cold 1× PBS, harvested by scraping, and lysed in RIPA buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). Lysates were briefly sonicated for 15 s and then centrifuged at 12,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatants were collected, and total protein content was quantified using the BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
4.12. Western Blot Analysis
Equal amounts of protein (30 μg) were separated by SDS-PAGE on 8% or 15% polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad, Feldkirchen, Germany) using a Trans-Blot Turbo transfer system (Bio-Rad). After transfer, membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature in TBS-T (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 137 mM NaCl, and Tween 20) containing 5% non-fat dry milk. Membranes were then cut according to the expected molecular weight of the target proteins and incubated overnight at 4 °C under gentle agitation with the following primary antibodies: anti-cleaved caspase-3 (#9664, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA; 1:1000), anti-cleaved caspase-9 (#20750, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA; 1:1000), and anti-cleaved PARP (#5625, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA; 1:1000). β-Actin (ab8226, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; 1:5000) was used as a loading control and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After three 5 min washes in TBS-T, membranes were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA; 1:2000). Immunoreactive bands were visualised using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system, and images were acquired with a ChemiDoc Imaging System and Image Lab 6.0.1 software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Milan, Italy). Band intensity was quantified using ImageJ software version 1.52n (Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), normalised to the corresponding loading control, and expressed as arbitrary units (AU).
4.13. Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 10.3.1 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Outliers were identified using the ROUT test. Differences between a single treatment group and the corresponding control were analysed using Student’s t-test. For cell viability/cytotoxicity assays, comparisons among multiple groups were performed using Brown–Forsythe and Welch ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple-comparison test, as homogeneity of variances was not assumed. Annexin V/PI flow-cytometry data were analysed by two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test. For cell viability experiments, raw absorbance values were first corrected for background and then normalised to a 0–100% scale using plate-specific controls according to the following formula: % viability = (OD sample − OD 20% DMSO)/(OD vehicle − OD 20% DMSO) × 100. Vehicle-treated cells (culture medium containing the same final concentration of DMSO as that used in LVD-treated wells) were used as the negative control and set at 100% viability, whereas cells exposed to 20% DMSO were used as the full-kill control and set at 0% viability. The 20% DMSO condition was used only for data normalisation and was not included in dose–response curve fitting. Half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were determined by non-linear regression analysis using the log(inhibitor) versus normalised response model with variable slope. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of n independent experiments. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
5. Conclusions
This study shows that pruning-derived Lavandula dentata (LVD) leaf-surface metabolites represent a chemically distinctive source of bioactive compounds with selective pro-apoptotic activity in colorectal cancer cells. The enrichment of LVD in methoxylated flavonoids and pentacyclic triterpenes, together with its preferential effect on HCT116 cells, supports the biological relevance of surface-associated metabolites from aromatic plant biomass. Overall, LVD emerges as a sustainable phytochemical matrix capable of impairing colorectal cancer cell survival through mitochondria-mediated apoptosis. These findings strengthen the value of pruning residues as underexploited resources for natural product-based anticancer research and provide a focused basis for the further development of Lavandula-derived bioactive agents.
Acknowledgments
During the preparation of this work, the authors used ChatGPT 5.5 to improve the language and avoid typos in the manuscript. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms27125535/s1.
Author Contributions
S.P.A.: Methodology, data curation, investigation, writing—original draft. M.S.: Methodology, data curation, investigation, writing—original draft. V.P.: Data curation, investigation, writing—original draft, visualization. E.R.: Data curation, investigation. N.D.T.: Conceptualization, supervision, validation, writing—review and editing. A.B.: Investigation, validation, writing—review and editing. V.D.V.: Methodology, data curation. N.A.C.: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, validation, writing—review and editing. L.S.: Conceptualization, supervision, validation, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are included within the article and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Siegel R.L., Giaquinto A.N., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2024;74:12–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820. Erratum in CA Cancer J. Clin. 2024, 74, 203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bray F., Laversanne M., Weiderpass E., Soerjomataram I. The ever-increasing importance of cancer as a leading cause of premature death worldwide. Cancer. 2021;127:3029–3030. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Davodabadi F., Sajjadi S.F., Sarhadi M., Mirghasemi S., Nadali Hezaveh M., Khosravi S., Kamali Andani M., Cordani M., Basiri M., Ghavami S. Cancer chemotherapy resistance: Mechanisms and recent breakthrough in targeted drug delivery. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2023;958:176013. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.176013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Garg P., Malhotra J., Kulkarni P., Horne D., Salgia R., Singhal S.S. Emerging Therapeutic Strategies to Overcome Drug Resistance in Cancer Cells. Cancers. 2024;16:2478. doi: 10.3390/cancers16132478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huang M., Lu J.J., Ding J. Natural Products in Cancer Therapy: Past, Present and Future. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2021;11:5–13. doi: 10.1007/s13659-020-00293-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kangra K., Kakkar S., Mittal V., Kumar V., Aggarwal N., Chopra H., Malik T., Garg V. Incredible use of plant-derived bioactives as anticancer agents. RSC Adv. 2025;15:1721–1746. doi: 10.1039/d4ra05089d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ma J., Wang X., Sun Q. Beyond cytotoxicity: Molecular mechanisms of natural products as multi-targeting modulators and chemo-sensitizers in oncology. Front. Pharmacol. 2026;17:1782874. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2026.1782874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Batiha G.E., Teibo J.O., Wasef L., Shaheen H.M., Akomolafe A.P., Teibo T.K.A., Al-Kuraishy H.M., Al-Garbeeb A.I., Alexiou A., Papadakis M. A review of the bioactive components and pharmacological properties of Lavandula species. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 2023;396:877–900. doi: 10.1007/s00210-023-02392-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dobros N., Zawada K.D., Paradowska K. Phytochemical Profiling, Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Plants Belonging to the Lavandula Genus. Molecules. 2022;28:256. doi: 10.3390/molecules28010256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Haban M., Korczyk-Szabo J., Certekova S., Razna K. Lavandula Species, Their Bioactive Phytochemicals, and Their Biosynthetic Regulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:8831. doi: 10.3390/ijms24108831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bouyahya A., Chamkhi I., El Menyiy N., El Moudden H., Harhar H., Idrissi Z.L.E., Khouchlaa A., Jouadi I., El Baaboua A., Taha D., et al. Traditional use, phytochemistry, toxicology, and pharmacological properties of Lavandula dentata L.: A comprehensive review. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2023;154:67–87. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2023.01.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Aboulwafa M.M., Mostafa N.M., Youssef F.S., Eldahshan O.A., Singab A.N.B. Lavandula dentata leaves as potential natural antibiofilm agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci. Rep. 2025;15:8540. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88824-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Algieri F., Rodriguez-Nogales A., Vezza T., Garrido-Mesa J., Garrido-Mesa N., Utrilla M.P., Gonzalez-Tejero M.R., Casares-Porcel M., Molero-Mesa J., Del Mar Contreras M., et al. Anti-inflammatory activity of hydroalcoholic extracts of Lavandula dentata L. and Lavandula stoechas L. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016;190:142–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.05.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.El Abdali Y., Agour A., Allali A., Bourhia M., El Moussaoui A., Eloutassi N., Salamatullah A.M., Alzahrani A., Ouahmane L., Aboul-Soud M.A.M., et al. Lavandula dentata L.: Phytochemical Analysis, Antioxidant, Antifungal and Insecticidal Activities of Its Essential Oil. Plants. 2022;11:311. doi: 10.3390/plants11030311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Terfi S., Djerrad Z., Krimat S., Sadi F. Phytochemical composition, cytotoxicity, antioxidant and antimicrobial responses of Lavandula dentata L. grown under different levels of heavy metals stress condition. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2023;46:864–878. doi: 10.1080/01480545.2022.2104868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Contreras M.D.M., Algieri F., Rodriguez-Nogales A., Galvez J., Segura-Carretero A. Phytochemical profiling of anti-inflammatory Lavandula extracts via RP-HPLC-DAD-QTOF-MS and -MS/MS: Assessment of their qualitative and quantitative differences. Electrophoresis. 2018;39:1284–1293. doi: 10.1002/elps.201700393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Giuliani C., Bottoni M., Ascrizzi R., Milani F., Papini A., Flamini G., Fico G. Lavandula dentata from Italy: Analysis of Trichomes and Volatiles. Chem. Biodivers. 2020;17:e2000532. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.202000532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lima T.S.V., Bressiani P.A., Peron A.P., Ciuffa M., Maia F.A., Fasolin L.H., Canteri M.H.G., Dalmolin I.A.L., Dusman E. Bioactive compounds and cytotoxic activity of Lavandula dentata extract obtained via supercritical extraction. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A. 2026;89:168–180. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2025.2549913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ali M.A., Abul Farah M., Al-Hemaid F.M., Abou-Tarboush F.M. In vitro cytotoxicity screening of wild plant extracts from Saudi Arabia on human breast adenocarcinoma cells. Genet. Mol. Res. 2014;13:3981–3990. doi: 10.4238/2014.May.23.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moteki H., Hibasami H., Yamada Y., Katsuzaki H., Imai K., Komiya T. Specific induction of apoptosis by 1,8-cineole in two human leukemia cell lines, but not a in human stomach cancer cell line. Oncol. Rep. 2002;9:757–760. doi: 10.3892/or.9.4.757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Murata S., Shiragami R., Kosugi C., Tezuka T., Yamazaki M., Hirano A., Yoshimura Y., Suzuki M., Shuto K., Ohkohchi N., et al. Antitumor effect of 1, 8-cineole against colon cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2013;30:2647–2652. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pyo Y., Kwon K.H., Jung Y.J. Anticancer Potential of Flavonoids: Their Role in Cancer Prevention and Health Benefits. Foods. 2024;13:2253. doi: 10.3390/foods13142253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sampath S., Veeramani V., Krishnakumar G.S., Sivalingam U., Madurai S.L., Chellan R. Evaluation of in vitro anticancer activity of 1,8-Cineole-containing n-hexane extract of Callistemon citrinus (Curtis) Skeels plant and its apoptotic potential. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017;93:296–307. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.06.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tayarani-Najaran Z., Amiri A., Karimi G., Emami S.A., Asili J., Mousavi S.H. Comparative studies of cytotoxic and apoptotic properties of different extracts and the essential oil of Lavandula angustifolia on malignant and normal cells. Nutr. Cancer. 2014;66:424–434. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2013.878736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mahmoud S.S., Maddock S., Adal A.M. Isoprenoid Metabolism and Engineering in Glandular Trichomes of Lamiaceae. Front. Plant Sci. 2021;12:699157. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.699157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Crisan I., Ona A., Varban D., Muntean L., Varban R., Stoie A., Mihaiescu T., Morea A. Current Trends for Lavender (Lavandula angustifolia Mill.) Crops and Products with Emphasis on Essential Oil Quality. Plants. 2023;12:357. doi: 10.3390/plants12020357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kirkinci S., Gercek Y.C., Basturk F.N., Yildirim N., Gidik B., Bayram N.E. Evaluation of lavender essential oils and by-products using microwave hydrodistillation and conventional hydrodistillation. Sci. Rep. 2024;14:20922. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71115-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kummritz S., Tron N., Tegtmeier M., Schmidt A., Strube J. Resource-Efficient Use of Residues from Medicinal and Aromatic Plants for Production of Secondary Plant Metabolites. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2024;188:145–168. doi: 10.1007/10_2024_250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Uddin J., Muhsinah A.B., Imran M., Khan M.N., Musharraf S.G. Structure-fragmentation study of pentacyclic triterpenoids using electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-QTOFMS/MS) Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2022;36:e9243. doi: 10.1002/rcm.9243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sarhadi E., Nejad Ebrahimi S., Hadjiakhoondi A., Abbas-Mohammadi M., Manayi A., Parisi V., Pessolano E., Petrella A., De Tommasi N. Cytotoxic abietane diterpenoids from Salvia leriifolia Benth. Phytochemistry. 2022;202:113310. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2022.113310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sumner L.W., Amberg A., Barrett D., Beale M.H., Beger R., Daykin C.A., Fan T.W., Fiehn O., Goodacre R., Griffin J.L., et al. Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis Chemical Analysis Working Group (CAWG) Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI) Metabolomics. 2007;3:211–221. doi: 10.1007/s11306-007-0082-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Potocnjak I., Simic L., Vukelic I., Baticic L., Domitrovic R. Oleanolic acid induces HCT116 colon cancer cell death through the p38/FOXO3a/Sirt6 pathway. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2022;363:110010. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2022.110010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lin C.M., Chao M.C., Chen H.H., Chen H.J. Ursolic Acid Suppresses Colorectal Cancer Through Autophagy-Lysosomal Degradation of beta-Catenin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:6210. doi: 10.3390/ijms26136210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhang H., Zhang X., Ma X., Wang X. Ursolic acid in colorectal cancer: Mechanisms, current status, challenges, and future research directions. Pharmacol. Rep. 2025;77:72–86. doi: 10.1007/s43440-024-00684-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.AlMousa L.A., Pandey P., Lakhanpal S., Kyada A.K., H M., Nayak P.P., Hussain A., Hasan T.N., Alagal R.I., Khan F. An updated review deciphering the anticancer potential of pentacyclic triterpene lupeol and its nanoformulations. Front. Pharmacol. 2025;16:1594901. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1594901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Farooqi M.A., Sahu K.K. Signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms of lupeol in colorectal cancer: A comprehensive review. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 2026;17:101270. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2025.101270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sevim Nalkiran H., Nalkiran I. Anticancer Effects and Phytochemical Profile of Lavandula stoechas. Pharmaceuticals. 2025;18:1706. doi: 10.3390/ph18111706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sur S., Pagliarini R., Bunz F., Rago C., Diaz L.A., Jr., Kinzler K.W., Vogelstein B., Papadopoulos N. A panel of isogenic human cancer cells suggests a therapeutic approach for cancers with inactivated p53. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:3964–3969. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813333106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yan S., Zhan F., He Y., Zhu Y., Ma Z. p53 in colorectal cancer: From a master player to a privileged therapy target. J. Transl. Med. 2025;23:684. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06566-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hassan A., Aubel C. The PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathway in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Resistance Pathway and a Prime Target for Targeted Therapies. Cancers. 2025;17:2232. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Massihnia D., Galvano A., Fanale D., Perez A., Castiglia M., Incorvaia L., Listi A., Rizzo S., Cicero G., Bazan V., et al. Triple negative breast cancer: Shedding light onto the role of pi3k/akt/mtor pathway. Oncotarget. 2016;7:60712–60722. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wu T.N., Chen H.M., Shyur L.F. Current Advancements of Plant-Derived Agents for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy through Deregulating Cancer Cell Functions and Reprogramming Tumor Microenvironment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:13571. doi: 10.3390/ijms222413571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Grabowska K., Galanty A., Pecio L., Stojakowska A., Malarz J., Zmudzki P., Zagrodzki P., Podolak I. Selectivity Screening and Structure-Cytotoxic Activity Observations of Selected Oleanolic Acid (OA)-Type Saponins from the Amaranthaceae Family on a Wiade Panel of Human Cancer Cell Lines. Molecules. 2024;29:3794. doi: 10.3390/molecules29163794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Olejarz W., Augustynowicz-Kopec E., Glogowska A., Napiorkowska M., Szostek T., Filipek A., Szulczyk D. In vitro anticancer studies of new derivatives based on the furanocoumarin scaffold. Sci. Rep. 2025;16:1412. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-30998-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yazir M., Bayar Muluk N., Alaskarov E., Bulbul M.V., Acar T.Y., Keskin I., Cingi C. Anticancer Effects of Lavandula Angustifolia, L. Essential Oil: Dose-Dependent Cytotoxicity in HNO210 Human Laryngeal Carcinoma Cells. J. Craniofacial Surg. 2025 doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000012293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dogru Z., Dogru M.S., Yesilay G., Kayalar O., Elmastas M. Anticancer activity of Lavandula stoechas L. flower ethanolic extract through apoptotic pathway modulation in colorectal cancer cells. Acta Pharm. 2025;75:449–468. doi: 10.2478/acph-2025-0034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ovidi E., Masci V.L., Taddei A.R., Paolicelli P., Petralito S., Trilli J., Mastrogiovanni F., Tiezzi A., Casadei M.A., Giacomello P., et al. Chemical Investigation and Screening of Anti-Proliferative Activity on Human Cell Lines of Pure and Nano-Formulated Lavandin Essential Oil. Pharmaceuticals. 2020;13:352. doi: 10.3390/ph13110352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Span L.F., Pennings A.H., Vierwinden G., Boezeman J.B., Raymakers R.A., de Witte T. The dynamic process of apoptosis analyzed by flow cytometry using Annexin-V/propidium iodide and a modified in situ end labeling technique. Cytometry. 2002;47:24–31. doi: 10.1002/cyto.10028.abs. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wlodkowic D., Skommer J., Darzynkiewicz Z. Cytometry in cell necrobiology revisited. Recent advances and new vistas. Cytom. A. 2010;77:591–606. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Brentnall M., Rodriguez-Menocal L., De Guevara R.L., Cepero E., Boise L.H. Caspase-9, caspase-3 and caspase-7 have distinct roles during intrinsic apoptosis. BMC Cell Biol. 2013;14:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-14-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Samraj A.K., Sohn D., Schulze-Osthoff K., Schmitz I. Loss of caspase-9 reveals its essential role for caspase-2 activation and mitochondrial membrane depolarization. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2007;18:84–93. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e06-04-0263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sivandzade F., Bhalerao A., Cucullo L. Analysis of the Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Using the Cationic JC-1 Dye as a Sensitive Fluorescent Probe. Bio Protoc. 2019;9:e3128. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wei F., Nian Q., Zhao M., Wen Y., Yang Y., Wang J., He Z., Chen X., Yin X., Wang J., et al. Natural products and mitochondrial allies in colorectal cancer therapy. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023;167:115473. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Laghezza Masci V., Ovidi E., Taddei A.R., Turchetti G., Tiezzi A., Giacomello P., Garzoli S. Apoptotic Effects on HL60 Human Leukaemia Cells Induced by Lavandin Essential Oil Treatment. Molecules. 2020;25:538. doi: 10.3390/molecules25030538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hu D., Meng R.Y., Nguyen T.V., Chai O.H., Park B.H., Lee J.S., Kim S.M. Inhibition of colorectal cancer tumorigenesis by ursolic acid and doxorubicin is mediated by targeting the Akt signaling pathway and activating the Hippo signaling pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2023;27:11. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2022.12898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hourani W. Context-dependent cytotoxicity and ADMET profiling of methoxylated flavonoids as novel leads for metastatic prostate cancer. RSC Adv. 2026;16:13612–13623. doi: 10.1039/d5ra09216g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Janthong A., Utama K., Khamto N., Chawapun P., Siriphong S., Van Doan H., Meerak J., Meepowpan P., Sangthong P. Semi-synthetic flavonoid derivatives from Boesenbergiarotunda induce extrinsic apoptosis pathway via Caspase-3 and Caspase-8 in HCT116 Colon Cancer cell lines. Bioorganic Chem. 2025;159:108343. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2025.108343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hikisz P., Adamus-Grabicka A.A., Budzisz E. Multifaceted Anticancer Activity of Flavanone/Chromanone Intermediates for Five-Membered Heterocyclic Derivatives: Targeting Oxidative Stress, Apoptosis, and MAPK Signaling in Colorectal Cancer. Molecules. 2026;31:534. doi: 10.3390/molecules31030534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Perez-Magarino S., Bueno-Herrera M., Asensio S.M.M.C. Characterization of Bioactive Phenolic Compounds Extracted from Hydro-Distillation By-Products of Spanish Lamiaceae Plants. Molecules. 2024;29:5285. doi: 10.3390/molecules29225285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chen Q., Zhang Y., Zhang W., Chen Z. Identification and quantification of oleanolic acid and ursolic acid in Chinese herbs by liquid chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2011;25:1381–1388. doi: 10.1002/bmc.1614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rhourri-Frih B., Chaimbault P., Claude B., Lamy C., Andre P., Lafosse M. Analysis of pentacyclic triterpenes by LC-MS. A comparative study between APCI and APPI. J. Mass Spectrom. 2009;44:71–80. doi: 10.1002/jms.1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Parisi V., Donadio G., Bellone M.L., Belaabed S., Bader A., Bisio A., Iobbi V., Gazzillo E., Chini M.G., Bifulco G., et al. Exploring the Anticancer Potential of Premna resinosa (Hochst.) Leaf Surface Extract: Discovering New Diterpenes as Heat Shock Protein 70 (Hsp70) Binding Agents. Plants. 2023;12:2421. doi: 10.3390/plants12132421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Schmid R., Heuckeroth S., Korf A., Smirnov A., Myers O., Dyrlund T.S., Bushuiev R., Murray K.J., Hoffmann N., Lu M., et al. Integrative analysis of multimodal mass spectrometry data in MZmine 3. Nat. Biotechnol. 2023;41:447–449. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01690-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Parisi V., Alizadeh Z., Pecoraro M., Boccia E., Franceschelli S., Chini M.G., Bader A., Bifulco G., De Tommasi N., Braca A., et al. Diterpenes from Hypoestes forskaolii leaves and their cytotoxic activity. Phytochemistry. 2026;248:114906. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2026.114906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Yu J.S., Kwak Y.B., Kee K.H., Wang M., Kim D.H., Dorrestein P.C., Kang K.B., Yoo H.H. A versatile toolkit for drug metabolism studies with GNPS2: From drug development to clinical monitoring. Nat. Protoc. 2026;21:1265–1299. doi: 10.1038/s41596-025-01237-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Feoktistova M., Geserick P., Leverkus M. Crystal Violet Assay for Determining Viability of Cultured Cells. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2016;2016:pdb prot087379. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot087379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Cacciola N.A., Venneri T., Salzano A., D’Onofrio N., Martano M., Saggese A., Vinale F., Neglia G., Campanile C., Baccigalupi L., et al. Chemopreventive effect of a milk whey by-product derived from Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) in protecting from colorectal carcinogenesis. Cell Commun. Signal. 2023;21:245. doi: 10.1186/s12964-023-01271-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are included within the article and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.





