Abstract
Background
NKX3.1 is a prostate-specific tumor suppressor that is frequently downregulated during the early stages of prostate cancer. Although NKX3.1 knockout (KO) mice develop spontaneous epithelial abnormalities, these lesions rarely progress beyond early neoplastic changes without additional oncogenic stimulus. Therefore, we investigated whether exogenous testosterone (TS) exacerbates early-stage, pre-neoplastic lesions in the prostate of NKX3.1 KO mice. Alterations in prostate weights of male reproductive organs (testis, seminal vesicles, and prostate lobes), histopathological lesion scores, apoptotic proteins, and angiogenic proteins were analyzed in C57BL/6 NKX3.1em1Hlee/Korl KO (NKX3.1 KO) mice injected with TS for six weeks.
Results
The weight of testis, seminal vesicles and ventral prostate was commonly changed in TS-treated mice of wild type (WT) and NKX3.1 KO group, while those of the dorsolateral and anterior prostate were only increased in TS-treated NKX3.1 KO group compared to those of WT. Histopathological lesion severity was greater in TS-treated NKX3.1 KO mice, with the highest lesion scores observed in the high-dose TS (HiTS)-treated KO group, and a similar pattern was observed for p53 staining. The expression levels of apoptotic and angiogenic proteins were significantly increased in TS-treated NKX3.1 KO mice compared to the same group of WT mice.
Conclusions
These findings suggest that the exogenous TS exacerbates early-stage, pre-neoplastic lesions in the prostate of NKX3.1 KO mice, consistent with a gene–hormone synergistic interaction. The mechanistic basis of this synergy remains to be defined.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42826-026-00284-8.
Keywords: NKX3.1, Testosterone, Pre-neoplastic lesions, Prostatic hyperplasia
Background
Prostate cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among men worldwide [1]. Its initiation and development are driven by a complex interplay of hormonal regulation, genetic alterations, and environmental factors. Androgen signaling, particularly through testosterone (TS) and its more potent derivative dihydrotestosterone (DHT), plays a pivotal role in maintaining the growth, differentiation, and function of the prostate gland [2–4]. While physiological levels of TS are required for normal prostate homeostasis, the excessive or dysregulated TS exposure has been associated with abnormal cellular proliferation, prostatic hyperplasia, and may influence prostate cancer risk in both clinical and experimental contexts [5–7].
Among genetic factors contributing to prostate cancer susceptibility, NKX3.1, a prostate-specific homeobox gene located at chromosome 8p21, has been extensively characterized as an early-onset tumor suppressor [8]. This gene is highly expressed in normal prostate epithelial cells and plays a crucial role in regulating epithelial cell differentiation [9], suppressing oxidative stress [10], and maintaining DNA integrity [11]. Notably, loss or reduction of NKX3.1 expression is one of the earliest molecular events observed in human prostate carcinogenesis and is detected in over 60–80% of early-stage prostate cancers [8, 12]. Mouse models lacking NKX3.1 (NKX3.1 knockout, or KO) recapitulate many of the histopathological features of human prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, including epithelial hyperplasia, nuclear atypia, and increased proliferation [13]. However, these mice do not spontaneously develop invasive prostate cancer, suggesting that NKX3.1 loss alone is insufficient for full malignant transformation but may act as a “gatekeeper” that predisposes the prostate to secondary oncogenic insults [9, 13, 14].
Meanwhile, the previous studies have demonstrated that androgen injection into rodents can induce the prostatic epithelial proliferation and even lead to the neoplastic changes under certain conditions [15, 16]. Moreover, hormone replacement therapy in aging men—while restoring systemic TS levels—has raised questions regarding its safety in individuals at high risk of prostate cancer [17]. However, despite extensive research on NKX3.1 KO mice [9, 13, 18], no previous studies have directly examined the injection effects of exogenous TS on the development of early-stage, pre-neoplastic lesions in NKX3.1-deficient mice. Understanding the combinatorial effects of genetic vulnerability and androgenic stimulation is thus essential for elucidating the early events of prostate cancer development and for identifying potential windows for therapeutic intervention, particularly given the clinical relevance to TS replacement therapy safety [19, 20].
In this study, we investigated whether the injection of exogenous TS exacerbates early-stage, pre-neoplastic lesions during NKX3.1 deficiency. We hypothesized that NKX3.1 loss creates a permissive genetic background that sensitizes the prostate epithelium to androgen-dependent early neoplastic remodeling. This approach offers a biologically grounded in vivo context to explore gene–hormone synergy at the initiation stage and may help contextualize potential risks relevant to testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) in genetically susceptible individuals.
Methods
Animals
C57BL/6N-NKX3.1em1Hlee KO mice, generated by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing, were obtained from the Laboratory Animal Resources Bank (LAREB), Department of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation (NIFDS, Cheongju, Korea) [21]. Wild-type (WT) and NKX3.1 KO mice were maintained at the Laboratory Animal Resources Center of Pusan National University, which is accredited by the Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA; Unit No. 000231) and the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC; Unit No. 001525). Mice were housed under a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle (lights on at 07:00 and off at 19:00) at a controlled temperature of 22 ± 2°C and relative humidity of 50 ± 10% in individually ventilated cages (IVCs; 17 × 32 × 14 cm) within an ENVIRO-GARD™-B Environmental Control System (Lab Products Inc., Seaford, DE, USA). Shelter/Igloo enrichment was provided. Mice had ad libitum access to distilled water and a standard chow diet (Samtako BioKorea Co., Osan, Korea). Animal protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Pusan National University (PNU-IACUC; Approval No. PNU-2017–1719).
Testosterone injection
To inject TS into WT and NKX3.1 KO mice, 10-week-old mice (male) were divided into four treatment groups each (n = 5 per group): no treatment (No), vehicle (Veh) (Olive oil, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), low-dose testosterone (LoTS), and high-dose testosterone (HiTS)-treated groups. TS propionate (Tokyo Chemical Ins. Co., Tokyo, Japan) was dissolved in olive oil and subcutaneously injected five times per week for six consecutive weeks. The TS doses (3 and 6 mg/kg) were selected based on published mice androgen-injection protocols within a comparable mg/kg range. TS injection at 3 mg/kg has been used to induce TS-responsive prostate epithelial hyperplasia phenotypes in mice [22], and higher-dose TS propionate (e.g., 7.5 mg/kg, s.c.) has also been used in mice studies to elicit robust androgen-driven prostate growth phenotypes [23]. Accordingly, we designated 3 mg/kg as a LoTS-treated group and 6 mg/kg as a HiTS -treated group to evaluate dose-dependence of early-stage lesion phenotypes in NKX3.1-deficient prostates. LoTS and HiTS corresponded to 3 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg, respectively, delivered in a volume of 100 μL per injection. The mice in the Veh-treated group were received the same volume of olive oil following the same injection schedule. Body weight was measured once weekly throughout the treatment period. On the day following the final TS injection, mice were euthanized using CO₂ inhalation. Whole blood was collected from the abdominal aorta, and the testis, seminal vesicles (SV), ventral prostate (VP), dorsolateral prostate (DLP), and anterior prostate (AP) were excised from the abdominal cavity of mice, and organ weights were recorded immediately after collection. Each region of the prostate tissue was used for histological and molecular analyses (Fig. 1A).
Fig. 1.
Experimental scheme and serum testosterone concentration following TS treatment. (A) Experimental scheme for TS injection and analysis. WT and NKX3.1 KO mice were subcutaneously injected by LoTS or HiTS five times per week for six weeks. (B) Serum TS level. After collecting serum, their levels were measured by ELISA at the end of the treatment period. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *, p < 0.05 vs. No; #, p < 0.05 vs. Veh; §, p < 0.05 vs. LoTS. Statistical significance was determined by ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test. Abbreviations: wild type, WT; knockout, KO; Vehicle, Veh; low-dose testosterone, LoTS; high-dose testosterone, HiTS
ELISA
The concentration of TS in serum was measured using a TS ELISA kit (Cayman, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, whole blood was collected using BD Microtainer® SST™ Tubes (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C to obtain serum. A total of 50 μL of serum was then added to a 96-well microplate pre-coated with anti-testosterone antibodies. After incubation with enzyme-conjugated reagents and substrate, the absorbance of mixture was measured at 450 nm using a VersaMax plate reader (SoftMax® Pro software, v5.2; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). TS concentrations were determined by comparing the absorbance values to a standard curve of TS.
Histological analysis
DLP, VP, and AP of prostate were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 7 days. These tissues were processed, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at 4 μm thickness for histological analysis. And then, they were deparaffinized, rehydrated through a graded ethanol series, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E, Sigma-Aldrich) to evaluate histological structure and epithelial morphology. After optical microscopic examination of the prostate tissue sections at 400 x magnification, lesion type (hyperplasia/adenoma) and histopathological features were characterized by Professor Beum Seok Han at Hoseo University (Asan, Korea). In addition, histopathological alterations in each prostate lobe were scored in a blinded manner using a 0–4 lesion severity scale, where 0 = normal, 1 = minimal hyperplasia, 2 = slight hyperplasia, 3 = moderate hyperplasia, and 4 = adenoma.
For detection of p53 expression, immunofluorescence staining was performed on additional sections. After antigen retrieval using citrate buffer (pH = 6.0), sections were blocked with 5% normal goat serum at room temperature for 30 minutes and incubated overnight at 4°C with an anti-p53 primary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The sections were then incubated with an Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Finally, the green fluorescence signal for the localization and expression levels of p53 protein were analyzed the stained section using a fluorescence microscope (Moticam pro 285A, Motic Microscopes, Hong Kong, China). For quantitative analysis, p53 immunofluorescence intensity was measured in the epithelial compartment using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Corrected total cell fluorescence (CTCF) was calculated as Integrated Density − (ROI area × mean background fluorescence), and values were expressed as fold change normalized to the WT group.
Western blot
The expression levels of apoptotic and angiogenic proteins were detected as described in a previous study [24]. Briefly, the prostate tissues were homogenized in Pro-prep Protein Extraction Solution (iNtRON Biotechnology Inc., Seongnam, Korea) supplemented with half tablet of a protein inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Total tissue lysates were centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 5 minutes at 4°C to remove cellular debris, and the supernatants were collected. After determining the protein concentration using a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), the equal amounts of protein (30 μg) were separated by SDS-PAGE on 10% polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, UK) for 2 hrs at 40 V. The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) (TBST) for 1 hr at room temperature, followed by overnight incubation at 4°C with primary antibodies against vascular endothelial growth factor (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA), protein kinase B (AKT, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT, Cell Signaling Technology), and β-actin (1:1,000, Sigma–Aldrich). After washing with TBST, the membranes were incubated with goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (TransGen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) for 1 hr at room temperature. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (ECL, Amersham Bioscience) and detected with a FluorChem® FC2 Imaging system (Alpha Innotech Corporation, San Leandro, CA, USA).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (version 8.0.2; GraphPad Software, Boston, MA, USA). For continuous variables, homogeneity of variance was assessed using the Brown-Forsythe test. When the equal-variance assumption was satisfied, ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test was used. When the assumption was violated, Welch’s ANOVA followed by Games-Howell’s multiple-comparisons test was applied. Histopathological lesion scores were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple-comparisons test. Data are presented as mean ± SD, and differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Results
Increase in serum testosterone levels after testosterone injection in NKX3.1 KO mice
Firstly, we confirmed that TS injection increased serum TS levels in both WT and NKX3.1 KO mice. To achieve this, the serum TS concentrations were determined in the serum of WT and NKX3.1 KO mice after subcutaneously injection for 6 weeks. Weekly body weight monitoring during the 6-week treatment period showed no marked differences among groups (Supplementary Figure S1). As shown in Fig. 1B, the TS concentration was significantly increased in the serum of LoTS and HiTS-treated group of WT and NKX3.1 KO mice without any significant difference between them. But, this level was higher in HiTS-treated group of both mice than LoTS-treated group. These results confirm that serum TS concentrations were significantly increased after 6 weeks of TS injection.
Effects of testosterone injection on the weights of testis, SV and prostate in NKX3.1 KO mice
Exogenous TS is known to modulate the growth of androgen-responsive tissues, including the prostate and seminal vesicles (SV) [4, 25]. To investigated whether the injection of TS can affect the weight of male reproductive organs in NKX3.1 KO mice, alterations on the weight for testis, SV and three prostate lobes (DLP, VP and AP) were measured in TS-treated WT and NKX3.1 KO mice. The weight of testis were remarkably decreased in TS-treated group compared to Veh-treated group. But, there was no specific difference between WT and NKX3.1 KO mice (Fig. 2A and B). A reverse pattern for testis weight was detected in the weight of SV. It was higher in TS-treated group than Veh-treated group without any significant difference between WT and NKX3.1 KO mice (Fig. 2A and C). Also, the weight of DLP and AP were increased in only NKX3.1 KO mice, while WT mice was constantly remained in TS-treated groups (Fig. 2A, D and F). However, those of VP did not show a significant tendency (Fig. 2A and E). These findings demonstrate that the injection of exogenous TS may contribute to increase the weight of DLP and AP during NKX3.1 deficiency.
Fig. 2.
Weights of testis, SV and prostate lobes. (A) Actual image of male reproductive organs. (B) Testis weight. (C) SV weight. (D) DLP weight. (E) VP weight. (F) AP weight. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *, p < 0.05 vs. No; #, p < 0.05 vs. Veh; §, p < 0.05 vs. LoTS. Statistical significance was determined by ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test. Abbreviation: wild type, WT; knockout, KO; Vehicle, Veh; low-dose testosterone, LoTS; high-dose testosterone, HiTS; seminal vesicle, SV; dorsolateral prostate, DLP; ventral prostate, VP; anterior prostate, AP
Effects of testosterone injection on hyperplasia and adenoma lesions of prostate in NKX3.1 KO mice
To investigate whether the injection of exogenous TS can induces the epithelial hyperplasia or neoplastic changes in the prostate under NKX3.1-deficient conditions, alterations on the histopathological structure of prostate were analyzed in the WT and NKX3.1 KO mice after injection of TS for 6 weeks. In WT mice, the DLP, VP, AP lobes of the No and Veh-treated groups showed the normal glandular architecture, consisting of a single layer of columnar epithelial cells and open luminal spaces (Fig. 3A). TS injection induced only mild epithelial thickening and glandular infoldings in a small subset of WT mice, with low histopathological lesion scores across the Veh-, LoTS-, and HiTS-treated groups (Table 1). In contrast, NKX3.1 KO mice exhibited the spontaneous epithelial disorganization of prostate, including irregular nuclear morphology and reduced luminal volume without TS injection (Fig. 3B). After TS injection, these histological abnormalities were markedly exacerbated. Accordingly, histopathological lesion scores tended to increase in the DLP, VP and AP of LoTS- and HiTS-treated NKX3.1 KO mice, with the highest scores observed in the HiTS-treated group (Table 1). Especially, the AP lobe of the HiTS-treated KO group showed the highest lesion score (3.4 ± 0.55) and was significantly higher than those of the Veh- and LoTS-treated WT groups, consistent with the greatest lesion severity (Table 1). These adenomatous lesions were characterized by multilayered epithelium, nuclear atypia, and cribriform glandular architecture, as shown in Fig. 3B, features indicative of early neoplastic transformation. Also, p53 immunoreactivity was increased in TS-treated NKX3.1 KO mice compared to WT mice, and this increase was more pronounced in the HiTS-treated group than in the LoTS-treated group (Fig. 4A and B), which was further supported by quantitative analysis of p53 immunofluorescence intensity (Fig. 4C). These findings demonstrate that the injection of exogenous TS exacerbates early-stage, pre-neoplastic lesions, increasing the severity of hyperplasia and adenoma in the prostate of NKX3.1 KO mice.
Fig. 3.
Histopathological structure of prostate lobes. (A) WT mice. (B) NKX3.1 KO mice. The section of three prostate lobes were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and their structures were observed at 400 × magnification. Numbered arrows/box indicate representative histopathological features described in the results: 1 glandular infolding; 2 mild epithelial thickening; 3 reduced luminal space; 4 epithelial hyperplasia; 5 cribriform architecture; 6 multilayered epithelium. Abbreviation: wild type, WT; knockout, KO; Vehicle, Veh; low-dose testosterone, LoTS; high-dose testosterone, HiTS; dorsolateral prostate, DLP; ventral prostate, VP; anterior prostate, AP
Table 1.
Histopathological lesion scores in the prostates of WT and NKX3.1 KO mice after TS injection
| Genotype | Groups | Lesion score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLP | VP | AP | ||
| WT | Veh | 0.4 ± 0.89 | 0.2 ± 0.45 | 0.4 ± 0.89 |
| LoTS | 0.4 ± 0.89 | 0.4 ± 0.89 | 0.2 ± 0.45 | |
| HiTS | 0.4 ± 0.89 | 0.4 ± 0.89 | 0.8 ± 1.10 | |
| NKX3.1 KO | Veh | 1.6 ± 1.67 | 0.2 ± 0.45 | 1.6 ± 1.67 |
| LoTS | 1.2 ± 1.10 | 0.4 ± 0.55 | 2.0 ± 1.87 | |
| HiTS | 2.4 ± 1.34 | 1.8 ± 1.64 | 3.4 ± 0.55*,# | |
Values are presented as mean ± SD. Histopathological alterations in H&E-stained sections of the dorsolateral prostate (DLP), ventral prostate (VP), and anterior prostate (AP) were scored in a blinded manner using a 0–4 lesion severity scale: 0, normal; 1, minimal hyperplasia; 2, slight hyperplasia; 3, moderate hyperplasia; and 4, adenoma. Higher scores indicate greater lesion severity. *, p < 0.05 vs. WT-Veh; #, p < 0.05 vs. WT-LoTS, as determined by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple-comparisons test. Abbreviations: wild type, WT; knockout, KO; Vehicle, Veh; low-dose testosterone, LoTS; high-dose testosterone, HiTS
Fig. 4.
Immunofluorescence staining analysis for p53 protein. (A) WT mice. (B) NKX3.1 KO mice. The section of three prostate lobes were subjected to immunofluorescence staining using anti-p53 antibodies, and the green fluorescence signal were detected at 200 × magnification. (C) Quantification of p53 immunofluorescence intensity in the epithelial compartment, presented as normalized p53 intensity (fold change relative to WT). Data are presented as mean ± SD. *, p < 0.05 vs. No; #, p < 0.05 vs. Veh; §, p < 0.05 vs. LoTS. Statistical significance was determined by ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test. Abbreviation: wild type, WT; knockout, KO; Vehicle, Veh; low-dose testosterone, LoTS; high-dose testosterone, HiTS; dorsolateral prostate, DLP; ventral prostate, VP; anterior prostate, AP
Effects of testosterone injection on apoptosis-related markers in the prostate of NKX3.1 KO mice
Next, we analyzed apoptosis-related markers (Bax and Bcl-2) in the prostate after TS injection. To achieve this, alterations in the expression of apoptosis-related markers, including Bax and Bcl-2, were analyzed in the prostate of NKX3.1 KO mice after injection of TS. The ratio of Bax/Bcl-2 proteins was significantly increased in only HiTS-treated NKX3.1 KO mice, while this of LoTS-treated group was remained the same as No or Veh-treated group. But, in case of WT mice, these ratios constantly remained across all groups (Fig. 5A and B). Collectively, the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio increased in the HiTS-treated NKX3.1 KO mice, whereas it remained unchanged across WT groups.
Fig. 5.
Expression levels of apoptosis-related markers in prostate. (A) Western blot image for Bax and Bcl-2. (B) Relative level of Bax and Bcl-2 protein. Each protein was detected in total prostate proteins using specific antibodies. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *, p < 0.05 vs. No; #, p < 0.05 vs. Veh; §, p < 0.05 vs. LoTS. Statistical significance was determined by Welch’s ANOVA followed by Games-Howell’s multiple-comparisons test. Abbreviation: wild type, WT; knockout, KO; vehicle, Veh; Low-dose testosterone, LoTS; high-dose testosterone , HiTS; B-cell lymphoma 2, Bcl2; bcl-2-associated X protein, Bax. Full-length uncropped blots corresponding to this figure are provided in Supplementary Figure S2
Effects of testosterone injection on the angiogenic signaling in the prostate of NKX3.1 KO mice
As neoplastic lesion development and expansion can be accompanied by increased vascular signaling, angiogenesis is a key hallmark of early neoplastic transformation [26, 27]. Finally, we investigated whether the early-stage lesions observed in the prostate of TS-treated NKX3.1 KO mice were accompanied by activation of angiogenic signaling. To achieve this, alterations in the expression of key angiogenesis-related markers, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and AKT (Protein kinase B, PKB), a downstream effector of VEGF signaling, were analyzed in the prostate of NKX3.1 KO mice after injection of TS.
In WT mice, the level of VEGF expression and AKT phosphorylation did not changed neither LoTS- nor HiTS-treated group except the phosphorylation level of AKT in HiTS-treated group (Fig. 6A and B). However, in NKX3.1 KO mice, VEGF expression was increased in the HiTS-treated group relative to the No and Veh-treated groups although LoTS-treated group was remained the constant level (Fig. 6A and B). Similar increase patterns was detected in the phosphorylation level of AKT. It was remarkably higher in Veh-treated group than No group. But, this level was further increased in TS-treated group compared to Veh-treated group, the highest level of it was detected in HiTS-treated group (Fig. 6A and B). Collectively, these data indicate that the prostates of HiTS-treated NKX3.1 KO mice exhibited higher VEGF expression and increased AKT phosphorylation, consistent with an angiogenesis-associated marker profile in prostates exhibiting early-stage, pre-neoplastic lesions.
Fig. 6.
Expression levels of angiogenesis-related markers in prostate. (A) Western blot image for VEGF, p-AKT and AKT. (B) Relative level of VEGF protein and AKT phosphorylation. Each protein was detected in total prostate proteins using specific antibodies. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *, p < 0.05 vs. No; #, p < 0.05 vs. Veh; §, p < 0.05 vs. LoTS. Statistical significance was determined by Welch’s ANOVA followed by Games-Howell’s multiple-comparisons test. Abbreviation: wild type, WT; knockout, KO; vehicle, Veh; Low-dose testosterone, LoTS; high-dose testosterone, HiTS; vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGF; protein kinase B, AKT. Full-length uncropped blots corresponding to this figure are provided in Supplementary Figure S3
Discussion
TS and androgen signaling have been extensively studied in prostate biology and prostate carcinogenesis [28–30]. Within this framework, the present study investigated whether exogenous TS exacerbates early-stage, pre-neoplastic lesions in the prostate of NKX3.1-deficient mice. We found that NKX3.1 KO mice showed increased susceptibility to TS exposure, with greater histopathological lesion severity, accompanied by changes in apoptosis- and angiogenesis-related markers. Together, these findings are consistent with a gene–hormone interaction in which androgenic stimulation is associated with increased severity of early-stage lesions in NKX3.1-deficient prostates.
Clinically, although our dosing paradigm does not recapitulate clinical testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), our findings may help contextualize ongoing discussions regarding TRT and prostate safety outcomes [31–33]. Given that reduced NKX3.1 expression is an early event observed in a substantial proportion of prostate cancers [8], our data suggest that NKX3.1 deficiency may modify prostate tissue responses to exogenous TS, warranting further investigation.
NKX3.1, a well-established tumor suppressor, is frequently downregulated during early-stage prostate cancer [8, 12, 34]. However, NKX3.1 deficiency alone is generally insufficient to drive invasive carcinoma without additional oncogenic stimuli, despite its contribution to tumor initiation [13, 14]. A well-characterized example is concurrent PTEN loss: NKX3.1−/−;PTEN± compound mutants develop high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN)/early carcinoma lesions in 60% of mice by 6 months, compared with 10% in PTEN± single mutants, whereas invasive adenocarcinoma remains rare [9]. Other cooperative contexts, including c-MYC overexpression and inflammation-associated destabilization of NKX3.1, have similarly been reported to enhance early neoplastic changes over extended time frames [35, 36]. In this context, our short-term TS exposure was associated with increased histopathological lesion severity in NKX3.1 KO mice, including adenomatous change, while WT mice exhibited only mild hyperplasia. Adenoma was observed only in NKX3.1 KO mice (25% in LoTS and 50% in HiTS), supporting that androgenic stimulation can exacerbate pre-neoplastic lesion development in an NKX3.1-deficient background.
Consistent with the observed histopathological lesion phenotypes, TS injection also increased the weight of androgen-sensitive organs, including SV, DLP, and AP, in both WT and NKX3.1 KO mice. Although both genotypes responded to TS, the increase in organ weight was more pronounced in NKX3.1 KO mice, especially following high-dose treatment, suggesting heightened androgen sensitivity in the deficient of NKX3.1. This finding is consistent with reports that NKX3.1 regulates epithelial differentiation and modulates androgen-receptor signaling [37, 38].
To place these histopathological findings in a molecular context, we assessed apoptosis-related markers in the prostate. The Bax/Bcl-2 ratio is commonly used as a descriptive readout reflecting shifts in apoptosis-related balance in tissues [39–42]. In prostate-related studies, altered expression of Bcl-2 family proteins has been reported in association with treatment responses, including androgen manipulation, and TS exposure has been shown to modulate Bax/Bcl-2 patterns in a context-dependent manner [43–45]. Consistent with this, TS has been reported to exert either anti-apoptotic or pro-apoptotic effects depending on the tissue, dose, and experimental context [46, 47]. Accordingly, Bax and Bcl-2 were included in this study as descriptive, marker-level readouts accompanying exogenous TS exposure in NKX3.1-deficient prostates. Because Bax/Bcl-2 was measured only at the terminal time point and was not accompanied by a direct assay of proliferation or apoptosis, its functional relationship to the increased lesion severity could not be determined in the present study.
We also examined angiogenesis-related signaling because vascular-associated pathways can accompany neoplastic lesion development. VEGF/AKT signaling has been implicated in vascular- and growth-associated programs in the prostate, and prior work suggests that androgen signaling and NKX3.1 status can influence VEGF-family pathways [48–55]. In our study, VEGF expression and AKT phosphorylation were elevated in TS-treated NKX3.1 KO prostates, with the highest levels in the HiTS-treated group. Together, these findings suggest that NKX3.1 deficiency may be associated with more pronounced angiogenesis-related marker responses to exogenous TS in this model.
Limitations of this study include the descriptive, marker-level nature of our molecular assessments, the absence of a validated epithelial proliferation index, the short TS exposure period, and the use of a single tumor-suppressor knockout model. An additional limitation is the relatively small group size (n = 5 per group), which may limit statistical power for some endpoints. Therefore, the findings should be interpreted cautiously and confirmed in larger studies. Accordingly, the observed phenotype should be interpreted primarily as early-stage, pre-neoplastic lesions (hyperplasia/adenoma) rather than as directly quantified proliferative progression. Although NKX3.1 deficiency is associated with early prostate tumorigenic changes, invasive adenocarcinoma is uncommon in this genetic context without longer observation and/or additional cooperating alterations. Future studies incorporating extended exposure durations and multi-hit models will be helpful to determine whether the gene–hormone interaction observed here influences later-stage progression.
Conclusions
In this study, we investigated whether exogenous TS exacerbates early-stage, pre-neoplastic prostate lesions in the setting of NKX3.1-deficient mice. TS-treated NKX3.1 KO mice showed greater increases in prostate lobe weight, histopathological lesion severity, apoptosis-related marker levels, and angiogenic signaling than WT mice, with the most prominent changes observed in the HiTS-treated group. These findings highlight a synergistic interaction between androgen stimulation and NKX3.1 deficiency associated with early-stage prostate epithelial transformation. Also, our study underscores the importance of genetic context in modulating hormonal responsiveness and provides descriptive marker-level observations that accompany early prostate lesion development. Despite these insights, certain limitations should be acknowledged. The mechanistic basis of this gene–hormone synergy remains to be determined, and the relatively short experimental duration limits our ability to assess progression beyond early neoplastic changes. Furthermore, while the NKX3.1 KO model recapitulates key features of early prostate tumorigenesis, it does not fully reflect the molecular heterogeneity of human prostate cancer.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
We thank Jin Hyang Hwang, the animal technician, for managing animal care and use at the Laboratory Animal Resources Center at Pusan National University.
Abbreviations
- AKT
Protein Kinase B
- AP
Anterior Prostate
- DHT
Dihydrotestosterone
- DLP
Dorsolateral Prostate
- H&E
Hematoxylin and Eosin
- HGPIN
High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
- HiTS
High-Dose Testosterone
- KO
Knockout
- LoTS
Low-Dose Testosterone
- No
No treated
- SV
Seminal Vesicles
- TRT
Testosterone Replacement Therapy
- TS
Testosterone
- VEGF
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
- Veh
Vehicle
- VP
Ventral Prostate
- WT
Wild-Type
Author contributions
Conceptualization, D.Y.H.; methodology, D.Y.H.; validation, S.J.L. and J.J.P.; formal analysis, S.J.L. and J.J.P.; investigation, J.E.K., H.J.S., A.S., S.H.W., Y.R.K., and Y.E.R.; data curation, S.J.L. and J.J.P.; writing—original draft preparation, J.G. and D.Y.H.; writing—review and editing, J.G. and D.Y.H.; visualization, S.J.L. and J.J.P.; supervision, D.Y.H.; project administration, D.Y.H.; funding acquisition, D.Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by a grant from NLAR (National Laboratory Animal Resources), part of the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, in 2024 and 2025; by the Global LAMP Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (RS2024-00444460); and by the BK21 FOUR Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education, Republic of Korea (F25YY8109033).
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Pusan National University (PNU-IACUC; Approval No. PNU-2017–1719), and all procedures were conducted in accordance with institutional guidelines and regulations.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Su Jeong Lim and Jin Ju Park contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Jun Go, Email: ydrener@changwon.ac.kr.
Dae Youn Hwang, Email: dyhwang@pusan.ac.kr.
References
- 1.Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(1):12–49. 10.3322/caac.21820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Risbridger GP, Ellem SJ, McPherson SJ. Estrogen action on the prostate gland: a critical mix of endocrine and paracrine signaling. J Mol Endocrinol. 2007;39(3):183–88. 10.1677/JME-07-0053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Andriole GL, Bostwick DG, Brawley OW, Gomella LG, Marberger M, Montorsi F, et al. Effect of dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(13):1192–202. 10.1056/NEJMoa0908127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Isaacs JT. Role of androgens in prostatic cancer. Vitam Horm. 1994;49:433–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bosland MC. Testosterone treatment is a potent tumor promoter for the rat prostate. Endocrinology. 2014;155(12):4629–33. 10.1210/en.2014-1688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Parsons JK, Carter HB, Partin AW, Windham BG, Metter EJ, Ferrucci L, et al. Metabolic factors associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Clin Endocr Metab. 2006;91(7):2562–68. 10.1210/jc.2005-2799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee C, Kozlowski JM, Grayhack JT. Etiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol Clin North Am. 1995;22(2):237–46. 10.1016/S0094-0143(21)00661-3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bhatia-Gaur R, Donjacour AA, Sciavolino PJ, Kim M, Desai N, Young P, et al. Roles for NKX3.1 in prostate development and cancer. Genes Devel. 1999;13(8):966–77. 10.1101/gad.13.8.966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kim MJ, Cardiff RD, Desai N, Banach-Petrosky WA, Parsons R, Shen MM, et al. Cooperativity of NKX3.1 and pten loss of function in a mouse model of prostate carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(5):2884–89. 10.1073/pnas.042688999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Papachristodoulou A, Rodriguez-Calero A, Panja S, Margolskee E, Virk RK, Milner TA, et al. NKX3.1 localization to mitochondria suppresses prostate cancer initiation. Cancer Discov. 2021;11(9):2316–33. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bowen C, Zheng T, Gelmann EP. NKX3.1 Suppresses TMPRSS2–ERG gene rearrangement and mediates repair of androgen receptor–induced DNA damage. Cancer Res. 2015;75(13):2686–98. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Abate-Shen C, Shen MM. Molecular genetics of prostate cancer. Genes Dev. 2000;14(19):2410–34. 10.1101/gad.819500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Abdulkadir SA, Magee JA, Peters TJ, Kaleem Z, Naughton CK, Humphrey PA, et al. Conditional loss of NKX3.1 in adult mice induces prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22(5):1495–503. 10.1128/MCB.22.5.1495-1503.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Magee JA, Abdulkadir SA, Milbrandt J. Haploinsufficiency at the NKX3.1 locus. A paradigm for stochastic, dosage-sensitive gene regulation during tumor initiation. Cancer Cell. 2003;3(3):273–83. 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00047-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Noble RL. The development of prostatic adenocarcinoma in Nb rats following prolonged sex hormone administration. Cancer Res. 1977;37(6):1929–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shirai T, Takahashi S, Cui L, Futakuchi M, Kato K, Tamano S, et al. Experimental prostate carcinogenesis — rodent models. Mutat Res/Rev Mutat Res. 2000;462(2–3):219–26. 10.1016/S1383-5742(00)00039-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rhoden EL, Morgentaler A. Risks of testosterone-replacement therapy and recommendations for monitoring. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(5):482–92. 10.1056/NEJMra022251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ittmann M, Huang J, Radaelli E, Martin P, Signoretti S, Sullivan R, et al. Animal models of human prostate cancer: the consensus report of the New York meeting of the mouse models of human cancers consortium prostate pathology committee. Cancer Res. 2013;73(9):2718–36. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Litwin MS, Tan HJ. The diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: a review. JAMA. 2017;317(24):2532–42. 10.1001/jama.2017.7248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Abate-Shen C, Shen MM, Gelmann E. Integrating differentiation and cancer: the NKX3.1 homeobox gene in prostate organogenesis and carcinogenesis. Differentiation. 2008;76(6):717–27. 10.1111/j.1432-0436.2008.00292.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Park JJ, Kim JE, Jeon Y, Lee MR, Choi JY, Song BR, et al. Deletion of NKX3.1 via CRISPR/Cas9 induces prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in C57BL/6 mice. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020;19:1533033820964425. 10.1177/1533033820964425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Park SR, Jung DY, Kim TW, Lee CH, Jung JY. Growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible 45 beta (GADD45β) deletion suppresses testosterone-induced prostate hyperplasia in mice. Life Sci. 2018;211:74–80. 10.1016/j.lfs.2018.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Huang Y, Chen H, Zhou X, Wu X, Hu E, Jiang Z. Inhibition effects of chlorogenic acid on benign prostatic hyperplasia in mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 2017;809:191–95. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Song HJ, Seol A, Park J, Kim JE, Kim TR, Park KH, et al. Antioxidant and laxative effects of methanol extracts of green Pine cones (Pinus densiflora) in sprague-dawley rats with loperamide-induced constipation. Antioxid (Basel). 2024;14(1):37. . 10.3390/antiox14010037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sasagawa I, Nakada T, Kazama T, Satomi S, Terada T, Katayama T. Volume change of the prostate and seminal vesicles in male hypogonadism after androgen replacement therapy. Int Urology Nephrol. 1990;22(3):279–84. 10.1007/BF02550407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ferrara N, Hillan KJ, Gerber HP, Novotny W. Discovery and development of bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody for treating cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3(5):391–400. 10.1038/nrd1381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Costello LC, Franklin RB. Testosterone, prolactin, and oncogenic regulation of the prostate gland. A new concept: testosterone-independent malignancy is the development of prolactin-dependent malignancy! Oncol Rev. 2018;12(2):356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.He Y, Hooker E, Yu EJ, Cunha GR, Liao L, Xu J, et al. Androgen signaling is essential for development of prostate cancer initiated from prostatic basal cells. Oncogene. 2019;38(13):2337–50. 10.1038/s41388-018-0583-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kim WK, Olson AW, Mi J, Wang J, Lee DH, Le V, et al. Aberrant androgen action in prostatic progenitor cells induces oncogenesis and tumor development through IGF1 and wnt axes. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4364. 10.1038/s41467-022-32119-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bhasin S, Travison TG, Pencina KM, O’Leary M, Cunningham GR, Lincoff AM, et al. Prostate safety events during testosterone replacement therapy in men with hypogonadism: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(12):e2348692. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Loeb S, Folkvaljon Y, Damber JE, Alukal J, Lambe M, Stattin P. Testosterone replacement therapy and risk of favorable and aggressive prostate cancer. JCO. 2017;35(13):1430–36. 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.5304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yabluchanskiy A, Tsitouras PD. Is testosterone replacement therapy in older men effective and safe? Drugs Aging. 2019;36(11):981–89. 10.1007/s40266-019-00716-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bowen C, Bubendorf L, Voeller HJ, Slack R, Willi N, Sauter G, et al. Loss of NKX3.1 expression in human prostate cancers correlates with tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2000;60(21):6111–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Anderson PD, McKissic SA, Logan M, Roh M, Franco OE, Wang J, et al. NKX3.1 and Myc crossregulate shared target genes in mouse and human prostate tumorigenesis. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(5):1907–19. 10.1172/JCI58540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Markowski MC, Bowen C, Gelmann EP. Inflammatory cytokines induce phosphorylation and ubiquitination of prostate suppressor protein NKX3.1. Cancer Res. 2008;68(17):6896–901. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lei Q, Jiao J, Xin L, Chang CJ, Wang S, Gao J, et al. NKX3.1 stabilizes p53, inhibits AKT activation, and blocks prostate cancer initiation caused by PTEN loss. Cancer Cell. 2006;9(5):367–78. 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.03.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tan PY, Chang CW, Chng KR, Wansa KD, Sung WK, Cheung E. Integration of regulatory networks by NKX3-1 promotes androgen-dependent prostate cancer survival. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32(2):399–414. 10.1128/MCB.05958-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jurgensmeier JM, Xie Z, Deveraux Q, Ellerby L, Bredesen D, Reed JC. Bax directly induces release of cytochrome c from isolated mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(9):4997–5002. 10.1073/pnas.95.9.4997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shimizu S, Narita M, Tsujimoto Y, Tsujimoto Y. Bcl-2 family proteins regulate the release of apoptogenic cytochrome C by the mitochondrial channel VDAC. Nature. 1999;399(6735):483–87. 10.1038/20959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Raisova M, Hossini AM, Eberle J, Riebeling C, Wieder T, Sturm I, et al. The Bax/Bcl-2 ratio determines the susceptibility of human melanoma cells to CD95/Fas-mediated apoptosis. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;117(2):333–40. 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01409.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Oltvai ZN, Milliman CL, Korsmeyer SJ. Bcl-2 heterodimerizes in vivo with a conserved homolog, Bax, that accelerates programed cell death. Cell. 1993;74(4):609–19. . 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90509-O [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Khor LY, Moughan J, Al-Saleem T, Hammond EH, Venkatesan V, Rosenthal SA, et al. Bcl-2 and Bax expression predict prostate cancer outcome in men treated with androgen deprivation and radiotherapy on radiation therapy oncology group protocol 92-02. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(12):3585–90. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Perlman H, Zhang X, Chen MW, Walsh K, Buttyan R. An elevated bax/bcl-2 ratio corresponds with the onset of prostate epithelial cell apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 1999;6(1):48–54. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Li X, Marani M, Mannucci R, Kinsey B, Andriani F, Nicoletti I, et al. Overexpression of BCL-X(L) underlies the molecular basis for resistance to staurosporine-induced apoptosis in PC-3 cells. Cancer Res. 2001;61(4):1699–706. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Estrada M, Varshney A, Ehrlich BE. Elevated testosterone induces apoptosis in neuronal cells. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(35):25492–501. 10.1074/jbc.M603193200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Morimoto S, Mendoza-Rodriguez CA, Hiriart M, Larrieta ME, Vital P, Cerbon MA. Protective effect of testosterone on early apoptotic damage induced by streptozotocin in rat pancreas. J Endocrinol. 2005;187(2):217–24. 10.1677/joe.1.06357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Melegh Z, Oltean S. Targeting angiogenesis in prostate cancer. IJMS. 2019;20(11):2676. 10.3390/ijms20112676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Manning BD, Cantley LC. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell. 2007;129(7):1261–74. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hoxhaj G, Manning BD. The PI3K–AKT network at the interface of oncogenic signalling and cancer metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20(2):74–88. 10.1038/s41568-019-0216-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhou H, Li XM, Meinkoth J, Pittman RN. Akt regulates cell survival and apoptosis at a postmitochondrial level. J Cell Biol. 2000;151(3):483–94. 10.1083/jcb.151.3.483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Carver BS, Chapinski C, Wongvipat J, Hieronymus H, Chen Y, Chandarlapaty S, et al. Reciprocal feedback regulation of PI3K and androgen receptor signaling in PTEN-deficient prostate cancer. Cancer Cell. 2011;19(5):575–86. 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Haggstrom S, Lissbrant IF, Bergh A, Damber JE. Testosterone induces vascular endothelial growth factor synthesis in the ventral prostate in castrated rats. J Urol. 1999;161(5):1620–25. 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68994-X. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lee SH, Johnson D, Luong R, Sun Z. Crosstalking between androgen and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways in prostate cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(5):2759–68. 10.1074/jbc.M114.607846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhang H, Muders MH, Li J, Rinaldo F, Tindall DJ, Datta K. Loss of NKX3.1 favors vascular endothelial growth factor-C expression in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68(21):8770–78. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.






