Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1974 Aug;241(1):127–139. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010644

Chronic effects of botulinum toxin on neuromuscular transmission and sensitivity to acetylcholine in slow and fast skeletal muscle of the mouse

D A Tonge
PMCID: PMC1331076  PMID: 4371301

Abstract

1. A sublethal dose of botulinum toxin (type A) was injected into the muscles of one hind limb of the mouse causing local paralysis.

2. Neuromuscular transmission and muscle sensitivity to acetylcholine (ACh) were studied in vitro in soleus and extensor digitorium longus (EDL) from 6 hr to 4 months after the injection of toxin.

3. Both soleus and EDL failed to respond to nerve stimulation within 6 hr of the injection of toxin.

4. In muscle fibres in which neuromuscular transmission was blocked, subthreshold end-plate potentials (e.p.p.s) were recorded. The amplitude of the e.p.p.s increased during recovery from the effects of the toxin and both muscles contracted in response to nerve stimulation after 2-3 weeks.

5. For about 2 months muscles fatigued more rapidly than normal during repetitive nerve stimulation because of the low quantal content of e.p.p.s.

6. Supersensitivity to ACh developed in 3-5 days and persisted after the return of neuromuscular transmission. Muscle sensitivity to ACh became normal when the rate of fatigue during nerve stimulation was normal.

Full text

PDF
131

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albuquerque E. X., Thesleff S. A comparative study of membrane properties of innervated and chronically denervated fast and slow skeletal muscles of the rat. Acta Physiol Scand. 1968 Aug;73(4):471–480. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-201x.1968.tb10886.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ambache N. The peripheral action of Cl. botulinum toxin. J Physiol. 1949 Mar 15;108(2):127–141. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BROOKS V. B. An intracellular study of the action of repetitive nerve volleys and of botulinum toxin on miniature end-plate potentials. J Physiol. 1956 Nov 28;134(2):264–277. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BURGEN A. S. V., DICKENS F., ZATMAN L. J. The action of botulinum toxin on the neuro-muscular junction. J Physiol. 1949 Aug;109(1-2):10–24. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1949.sp004364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Quantal components of the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):560–573. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. The effect of magnesium on the activity of motor nerve endings. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):553–559. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Duchen L. W. An electron microscopic study of the changes induced by botulinum toxin in the motor end-plates of slow and fast skeletal muscle fibres of the mouse. J Neurol Sci. 1971 Sep;14(1):47–60. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(71)90129-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Elmqvist D., Quastel D. M. A quantitative study of end-plate potentials in isolated human muscle. J Physiol. 1965 Jun;178(3):505–529. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harris A. J., Miledi R. The effect of type D botulinum toxin on frog neuromuscular junctions. J Physiol. 1971 Sep;217(2):497–515. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. KATZ B., THESLEFF S. On the factors which determine the amplitude of the miniature end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1957 Jul 11;137(2):267–278. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lomo T., Rosenthal J. Control of ACh sensitivity by muscle activity in the rat. J Physiol. 1972 Mar;221(2):493–513. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MARTIN A. R. A further study of the statistical composition on the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1955 Oct 28;130(1):114–122. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MILEDI R. The acetylcholine sensitivity of frog muscle fibres after complete or partial devervation. J Physiol. 1960 Apr;151:1–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Spitzer N. Miniature end-plate potentials at mammalian neuromuscular junctions poisoned by botulinum toxin. Nat New Biol. 1972 May 3;237(70):26–27. doi: 10.1038/newbio237026a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. THESLEFF S. Supersensitivity of skeletal muscle produced by botulinum toxin. J Physiol. 1960 Jun;151:598–607. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES