Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1971 Jul;216(2):419–439. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009533

Recurrent inhibition of fusimotor neurones exhibiting background discharges in the decerebrate and the spinal cat

P H Ellaway
PMCID: PMC1331947  PMID: 4254318

Abstract

1. Discharges of functionally single fusimotor neurones have been recorded from the nerves to hamstring and triceps surae muscles in the cat. Background discharges were examined for both muscle groups in decerebrate animals but only for hamstrings in spinal preparations.

2. Background discharges in forty-six out of sixty-seven triceps and twenty-one out of twenty-five flexor hamstring fusimotor neurones were inhibited by an antidromic volley in other efferent axons. One semimembranosus neurone was similarly inhibited.

3. The inhibition was due to impulses in α motoneurone axons. It had a mean central delay of 2·3 ± 0·2 msec and 2·7 ± 0·2 msec for triceps and hamstring muscles respectively and was detectable for up to 100 msec, although shorter durations of the order of 10 msec were common.

4. It was possible for a fusimotor neurone in one ventral root to be inhibited by an antidromic volley in an adjacent ventral root. The origin of the inhibition was not confined to a unit's own muscle nerve.

5. The actions of eserine and strychnine on the inhibition were similar to their effects on recurrent inhibition of α motoneurones. Eserine potentiated and strychnine reduced the inhibition following an antidromic volley.

6. The inhibition was found in spinal and in decerebrate cats but it was depressed following spinal section. L-Dopa in the spinal animal depressed the background discharge of some neurones and potentiated that of others. Both sets of neurones could be inhibited by antidromic volleys.

7. It is concluded that antidromic inhibition of some fusimotor neurones does occur and that it is highly likely to be mediated via recurrent collaterals and Renshaw interneurones. The evidence from the use of L-Dopa indicates that the inhibition is present to both dynamic and static fusimotor neurones.

Full text

PDF
421

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALNAES E., JANSEN J. K., RUDJORD T. FUSIMOTOR ACTIVITY IN THE SPINAL CAT. Acta Physiol Scand. 1965 Mar;63:197–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1965.tb04060.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andén N. E., Jukes M. G., Lundberg A., Vyklický L. The effect of DOPA on the spinal cord. 1. Influence on transmission from primary afferents. Acta Physiol Scand. 1966 Jul-Aug;67(3):373–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1966.tb03324.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergmans J., Grillner S. Changes in dynamic sensitivity of primary endings of muscle spindle afferents induced by DOPA. Acta Physiol Scand. 1968 Dec;74(4):629–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1968.tb04273.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergmans J., Grillner S. Reciprocal control of spontaneous activity and reflex effects in static and dynamic flexor gamma-motoneurones revealed by an injection of DOPA. Acta Physiol Scand. 1969 Sep-Oct;77(1):106–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1969.tb04557.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown M. C., Lawrence D. G., Matthews P. B. Antidromic inhibition of presumed fusimotor neurones by repetitive stimulation of the ventral root in the decerebrate cat. Experientia. 1968 Dec 15;24(12):1210–1212. doi: 10.1007/BF02146625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DIETE-SPIFF K., PASCOE J. E. The spindle motor nerves to the gastrocnemius muscle of the rabbit. J Physiol. 1959 Dec;149:120–134. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. ECCLES J. C., ECCLES R. M., IGGO A., LUNDBERG A. Electrophysiological studies on gamma motoneurones. Acta Physiol Scand. 1960 Sep 30;50:32–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1960.tb02070.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ECCLES J. C., FATT P., KOKETSU K. Cholinergic and inhibitory synapses in a pathway from motor-axon collaterals to motoneurones. J Physiol. 1954 Dec 10;126(3):524–562. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. EKLUND G., VON EULER, RUTKOWSKI S. SPONTANEOUS AND REFLEX ACTIVITY OF INTERCOSTAL GAMMA MOTONEURONES. J Physiol. 1964 May;171:139–163. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. GRANIT R., PASCOE J. E., STEG G. The behaviour of tonic alpha and gamma motoneurones during stimulation of recurrent collaterals. J Physiol. 1957 Oct 30;138(3):381–400. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grillner S. The influence of DOPA on the static and the dynamic fusimotor activity to the triceps surae of the spinal cat. Acta Physiol Scand. 1969 Dec;77(4):490–509. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1969.tb04592.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HUNT C. C., PAINTAL A. S. Spinal reflex regulation of fusimotor neurones. J Physiol. 1958 Sep 23;143(2):195–212. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. HUNT C. C. The reflex activity of mammalian small-nerve fibres. J Physiol. 1951 Dec 28;115(4):456–469. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. JANSEN J. K., RUDJORD T. FUSIMOTOR ACTIVITY IN A FLEXOR MUSCLE OF THE DECEREBRATE CAT. Acta Physiol Scand. 1965 Mar;63:236–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1965.tb04063.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MATTHEWS P. B. The differentiation of two types of fusimotor fibre by their effects on the dynamic response of muscle spindle primary endings. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1962 Oct;47:324–333. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1962.sp001616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. PAINTAL A. S. Facilitation and depression of muscle stretch receptors by repetitive antidromic stimulation, adrenaline and asphyxia. J Physiol. 1959 Oct;148:252–266. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pugh P. M., Stone S. L. The effect of 2,4-dinitrophenol and related compounds on bile secretion. J Physiol. 1968 Sep;198(1):39–49. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. ROMANES G. J. The motor cell columns of the lumbo-sacral spinal cord of the cat. J Comp Neurol. 1951 Apr;94(2):313–363. doi: 10.1002/cne.900940209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. VOORHOEVE P. E., van KANTEN R. Reflex behaviour of fusimotor neurones of the cat upon electrical stimulation of various afferent fibers. Acta Physiol Pharmacol Neerl. 1962;10:391–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. WILSON V. J., TALBOT W. H., DIECKE F. P. Distribution of recurrent facilitation and inhibition in cat spinal cord. J Neurophysiol. 1960 Mar;23:144–153. doi: 10.1152/jn.1960.23.2.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES