Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Journal of Sports Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Sports Medicine
. 1997 Mar;31(1):41–44. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.31.1.41

Power output for wheelchair driving on a treadmill compared with arm crank ergometry.

H Tropp 1, K Samuelsson 1, L Jorfeldt 1
PMCID: PMC1332474  PMID: 9132210

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The limiting factors with regard to power output available for wheelchair ambulation have not been identified. The aim of the present study was to correlate power output during wheelchair driving with (i) power output and oxygen uptake during arm crank ergometry and (ii) arm muscle strength. METHODS: Eleven disabled men were examined for maximal power output (POmax) during wheelchair driving on a treadmill and during arm crank ergometry. Oxygen uptake (VO2) was recorded at submaximal and maximal arm crank ergometry in all men and during submaximal wheelchair driving on a treadmill in four men. Power output during wheelchair driving on a treadmill was measured. Static and dynamic elbow muscle strength was measured isokinetically. RESULTS: POmax was significantly lower (P < 0.001) for wheelchair driving (109 (31) W; mean (SD)) than for arm ergometry (163 (49) W). There was a significant correlation between POmax for arm crank ergometry and wheelchair driving (r = 0.73). There was no correlation between POmax and elbow strength. The mechanical efficiency was constant for the different levels on the arm crank ergometry test. The submaximal testing showed a consistently lower mechanical efficiency for wheelchair driving than for arm crank ergometry. CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that the lower level of power output for wheelchair driving is fully explained by the lower mechanical efficiency. Any improvement in power output available for ambulation must be based on wheelchair ergonomics.

Full text

PDF
42

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bar-or O., Inbar O., Spira R. Physiological effects of a sports rehabilitation program on cerebral palsied and post-poliomyelitic adolescents. Med Sci Sports. 1976 Fall;8(3):157–161. doi: 10.1249/00005768-197600830-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brattgård S. O., Grimby G., Hök O. Energy expenditure and heart rate in driving a wheel-chair ergometer. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1970;2(4):143–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coutts K. D., Rhodes E. C., McKenzie D. C. Maximal exercise responses of tetraplegics and paraplegics. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1983 Aug;55(2):479–482. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1983.55.2.479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dreisinger T. E., Londeree B. R. Wheelchair exercise: a review. Paraplegia. 1982 Feb;20(1):20–34. doi: 10.1038/sc.1982.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ekblom B., Lundberg A. Effect of physical training on adolescents with severe motor handicaps. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1968 Jan;57(1):17–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1968.tb07280.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gass G. C., Camp E. M. The maximum physiological responses during incremental wheelchair and arm cranking exercise in male paraplegics. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1984 Aug;16(4):355–359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Glaser R. M., Sawka M. N., Brune M. F., Wilde S. W. Physiological responses to maximal effort wheelchair and arm crank ergometry. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1980 Jun;48(6):1060–1064. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1980.48.6.1060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hildebrandt G., Voight E. D., Bahn D., Berendes B., Kröger J. Energy costs of propelling wheelchair at various speeds: cardiac response and effect on steering accuracy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1970 Mar;51(3):131–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kottke T. E., Caspersen C. J., Hill C. S. Exercise in the management and rehabilitation of selected chronic diseases. Prev Med. 1984 Jan;13(1):47–65. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(84)90040-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nilsson S., Staff P. H., Pruett E. D. Physical work capacity and the effect of training on subjects with long-standing paraplegia. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(2):51–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rhodes E. C., McKenzie D. C., Coutts K. D., Rogers A. R. A field test for the prediction of aerobic capacity in male paraplegics and quadraplegics. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1981 Dec;6(4):182–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sawka M. N., Glaser R. M., Laubach L. L., Al-Samkari O., Suryaprasad A. G. Wheelchair exercise performance of the young, middle-aged, and elderly. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1981 Apr;50(4):824–828. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1981.50.4.824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sawka M. N., Glaser R. M., Wilde S. W., von Luhrte T. C. Metabolic and circulatory responses to wheelchair and arm crank exercise. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1980 Nov;49(5):784–788. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1980.49.5.784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sedlock D. A., Knowlton R. G., Fitzgerald P. I. The effects of arm crank training on the physiological responses to submaximal wheelchair ergometry. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988;57(1):55–59. doi: 10.1007/BF00691238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Whipp B. J., Seard C., Wasserman K. Oxygen deficit-oxygen debt relationships and efficiency of anaerobic work. J Appl Physiol. 1970 Apr;28(4):452–456. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1970.28.4.452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wicks J. R., Oldridge N. B., Cameron B. J., Jones N. L. Arm cranking and wheelchair ergometry in elite spinal cord-injured athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1983;15(3):224–231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. van der Woude L. H., de Groot G., Hollander A. P., van Ingen Schenau G. J., Rozendal R. H. Wheelchair ergonomics and physiological testing of prototypes. Ergonomics. 1986 Dec;29(12):1561–1573. doi: 10.1080/00140138608967269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Sports Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES