Abstract
Acquisition of three-alternative simultaneous matching-to-sample and oddity-from-sample was investigated. Five goldfish were trained on matching and five on oddity for a minimum of 70 days. Subsequently, six of the fish were trained for 70 days on the other task. Acquisition was similar for oddity and matching. Correct responding started at about chance level and slowly increased to about 75%, with some animals performing at levels of over 85%. Acquisition of oddity following matching and matching following oddity began below chance. Maximal level of performance on second-task oddity was comparable to that on first-task matching. By contrast, the maximal levels of performance when matching was the second task were not as high as that of the same subjects at the end of first-task oddity. All fish exhibited strong color preferences during matching acquisition but not during oddity acquisition. The data demonstrated that goldfish can acquire a discrimination in which the stimulus associated with reinforcement depends on the identity of a second stimulus.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BITTERMAN M. E. PHYLETIC DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING. Am Psychol. 1965 Jun;20:396–410. doi: 10.1037/h0022328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berryman R., Cumming W. W., Cohen L. R., Johnson D. F. Acquisition and transfer of simultaneous oddity. Psychol Rep. 1965 Dec;17(3):767–775. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1965.17.3.767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bitterman M. E. The comparative analysis of learning. Science. 1975 May 16;188(4189):699–709. doi: 10.1126/science.188.4189.699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LONGO N., BITTERMAN M. E. Improved apparatus for the study of learning in fish. Am J Psychol. 1959 Dec;72:616–620. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SKINNER B. F. Are theories of learning necessary? Psychol Rev. 1950 Jul;57(4):193–216. doi: 10.1037/h0054367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]