Abstract
The fixed-ratio requirement was varied in concurrent fixed-interval fixed-ratio schedules. Fixed-interval responding was reinforced by food. In different phases, fixed-ratio responding was reinforced by food or water. There was a direct relation between the ratio requirement and interval response rates when both responses were reinforced with food, but essentially no relation when the reinforcers were different. The role of reinforcers in concurrent schedules merits detailed study.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Catania A. C. Self-inhibiting effects of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 May;19(3):517–526. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Falk J. L. Conditions producing psychogenic polydipsia in animals. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1969 May 15;157(2):569–593. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1969.tb12908.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Labounty C. E., Reynolds G. S. An analysis of response and time matching to reinforcement in concurrent ratio-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jan;19(1):155–166. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Willis R. D., Van Hartesveldt C., Loken K. K., Hall D. C. Motivation in concurrent variable-interval schedules with food and water reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):323–331. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]