Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1975 Mar;23(2):177–191. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-177

Response additivity: effects of superimposed free reinforcement on a variable-interval baseline1

R A Boakes, M S Halliday, M Poli
PMCID: PMC1333338  PMID: 16811838

Abstract

Three experiments examined the effects of superimposing free reinforcement (Free VI 30-sec) on behavior maintained by a response dependent mult VI 2-min VI 2-min schedule of reinforcement. Experiment I used pigeons as subjects, key pecking as the response, and colors of response key as the stimuli associated with the multiple-schedule components. When free reinforcement was added during only one component (Differential condition) a large and highly significant increase in response rate developed in this component. Adding free reinforcement during both components (Nondifferential condition) produced smaller and far less-consistent effects. An entirely different pattern of results was obtained in two subsequent experiments, where similar procedures and reinforcement conditions were used with rats as subjects and bar pressing as the response. In both Experiments II and III, response rates decreased to the stimulus associated with added free reinforcement in the Differential condition. These findings are interpreted as the result of interactions between behavior maintained by response-reinforcer contingencies and behavior maintained by stimulus-reinforcer contingencies. As such, they support the main assumption of an autoshaping theory of behavioral contrast, that additivity of responding generated by the two kinds of contingency can occur only in situations favorable to autoshaping.

Full text

PDF
180

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boakes R. A. Response decrements produced by extinction and by response-independent reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Mar;19(2):293–302. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown P. L., Jenkins H. M. Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):1–8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Catania A. C., Reynolds G. S. A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3 Suppl):327–383. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-s327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gamzu E., Schwartz B. The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jan;19(1):65–72. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hemmes N. S. Behavioral contrast in pigeons depends upon the operant. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1973 Oct;85(1):171–178. doi: 10.1037/h0034883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Henke P. G., Allen J. D., Davison C. Effect of lesions in the amygdala on behavioral contrast. Physiol Behav. 1972 Feb;8(2):173–176. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(72)90356-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Henton W. W., Brady J. V. Operant acceleration during a pre-reward stimulus. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):205–209. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jenkins H. M., Moore B. R. The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Sep;20(2):163–181. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Keller K. The role of elicited responding in behavioral contrast. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Mar;21(2):249–257. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lolordo V. M. Facilitation of food-reinforced responding by a signal for response-independent food. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jan;15(1):49–55. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Meltzer D., Brahlek J. A. Conditioned suppression and conditioned enhancement with the same positive UCS: an effect of CS duration. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jan;13(1):67–73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Miczek K. A., Grossman S. P. Positive conditioned suppression: effects of CS duration. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Mar;15(2):243–247. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pear J. J., Wilkie D. M. Contrast and induction in rats on multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 May;15(3):289–296. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Redford M. E., Perkins C. C. The role of autopecking in behavioral contrast. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jan;21(1):145–150. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ricci J. A. Key pecking under response-independent food presentation after long simple and compound stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 May;19(3):509–516. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schwartz B. Maintenance of key pecking by response-independent food presentation: the role of the modality of the signal for food. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jul;20(1):17–22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schwartz B., Williams D. R. The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 May;17(3):351–357. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Smith J. B. Effects of response rate, reinforcement frequency, and the duration of a stimulus preceding response-independent food. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Mar;21(2):215–221. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Westbrook R. F. Failure to obtain positive contrast when pigeons press a bar. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Nov;20(3):499–510. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Williams D. R., Williams H. Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jul;12(4):511–520. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES