Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1976 May;25(3):389–399. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-389

Some effects of delta-amphetamine and pentobarbital on performance under a long fixed-interval schedule.

D E McMillan, M L Healey
PMCID: PMC1333478  PMID: 1270972

Abstract

The effects of delta-amphetamine and pentobarbital were studied on performance during 3-hr sessions under fixed-interval 60-min schedules of food presentation. Low doses of delta-amphetamine increased rates of responding and higher doses decreased rates of responding, both during the entire 3-hr session and during each of the individual fixed intervals. Pentobarbital produced little effect on rates of responding averaged over the 3-r session, but it decreased rates during the first fixed interval and increased them during the second and third fixed intervals. The effects of delta-amphetamine were shown to be dependent on the control rate of responding, as has been shown with shorter fixed-interval values. Analysis of delta-amphetamine effects in terms of the point at which the probability of responding is greater than zero was not descriptive of overall fixed-interval performance.

Full text

PDF
390

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Branch M. N., Gollub L. R. A detailed analysis of the effects of d-amphetamine on behavior under fixed-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):519–539. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark F. C., Steele B. J. Effects of D-amphetamine on performance under a multiple schedule in the rat. Psychopharmacologia. 1966;9(2):157–169. doi: 10.1007/BF00404720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cumming W. W., Schoenfeld W. N. Behavior under extended exposure to a high-value fixed interval reinforcement schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Aug;1(3):245–263. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DEWS P. B. Studies on behavior. IV. Stimulant actions of methamphetamine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1958 Jan;122(1):137–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Leander J. D., McMillan D. E. Rate-dependent effects of drugs. I. Comparisons of d-amphetamine, pentobarbital and chlorpromazine on multiple and mixed schedules. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1974 Mar;188(3):726–739. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McMillan D. E. Effects of d-amphetamine on performance under several parameters of multiple fixed-ratio, fixed-interval schedules. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1969 May;167(1):26–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McMillan D. E. Some interactions between sympathomimetic amines and amine-depleting agents on the schedule-controlled behavior of the pigeon and the squirrel monkey. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1968 Sep;163(1):172–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McMillan D. E. The effects of sympathomimetic amines on schedule-controlled behavior in the pigeon. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1968 Apr;160(2):315–325. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. SMITH C. B. EFFECTS OF D-AMPHETAMINE UPON OPERANT BEHAVIOR OF PIGEONS: ENHANCEMENT BY RESERPINE. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1964 Nov;146:167–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schneider B. A. A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):677–687. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shull R. L., Brownstein A. J. Interresponse time duration in fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement: control by ordinal position and time since reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jul;14(1):49–53. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES