Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1977 Mar;27(2):341–350. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-341

Some implications of a relational principle of reinforcement1

John W Donahoe
PMCID: PMC1333598  PMID: 16811996

Abstract

A formal statement of a relational principle of reinforcement is developed that makes contact with analyses of choice, interresponse-time distributions, and stimulus control. Some implications for current theoretical and empirical work in the various areas are examined.

Keywords: reinforcement, relational principle, analysis of choice, interresponse-time distribution, stimulus control

Full text

PDF
344

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANGER D. The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times. J Exp Psychol. 1956 Sep;52(3):145–161. doi: 10.1037/h0041255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baum W. M. Chained concurrent schedules: reinforcement as situation transition. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):91–101. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baum W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baum W. M., Rachlin H. C. Choice as time allocation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):861–874. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baum W. M. The correlation-based law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jul;20(1):137–153. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baum W. M. Time-based and count-based measurement of preference. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Jul;26(1):27–35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Benedict J. O. Response-shock delay as a reinforcer in avoidance behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Nov;24(3):323–332. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Crites R. J., Harris R. T., Rosenquist H., Thomas D. R. Response patterning during stimulus generalization in the rat. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Mar;10(2):165–168. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. De Villiers P. A. The law of effect and avoidance: a quantitative relationship between response rate and shock-frequency reduction. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Mar;21(2):223–235. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hale J. M., Shimp C. P. Molecular contingencies: reinforcement probability. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Nov;24(3):315–321. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Herrnstein R. J., Loveland D. H. Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Jul;24(1):107–116. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hineline P. N. Negative reinforcement without shock reduction. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Nov;14(3):259–268. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Killeen P. The matching law. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 May;17(3):489–495. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MIGLER B. EFFECTS OF AVERAGING DATA DURING STIMULUS GENERALIZATION. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jul;7:303–307. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Migler B., Millenson J. R. Analysis of response rates during stimulus generalization. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jan;12(1):81–87. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. PREMACK D. Rate differential reinforcement in monkey manipulation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jan;6:81–89. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. PREMACK D. Toward empirical behavior laws. I. positive reinforcement. Psychol Rev. 1959 Jul;66(4):219–233. doi: 10.1037/h0040891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rescorla R. A. Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. Psychol Rev. 1967 Jan;74(1):71–80. doi: 10.1037/h0024109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. SCHAEFFER R. W. THE REINFORCEMENT RELATION AS A FUNCTION OF INSTRUMENTAL RESPONSE BASE RATE. J Exp Psychol. 1965 Apr;69:419–425. doi: 10.1037/h0021852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shimp C. P., Hawkes L. Time-allocation, matching, and contrast. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):1–10. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shimp C. P. Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Jul;9(4):443–455. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shimp C. P. The reinforcement of short interresponse times. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Sep;10(5):425–434. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. WYCKOFF L. B. Toward a quantitative theory of secondary reinforcement. Psychol Rev. 1959 Jan;66(1):68–78. doi: 10.1037/h0046882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES